RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients receiving oncological esophagectomy or gastrectomy are known to be at high risk for vitamin and micronutrient deficiency before, during and after surgery. However, there are no clear guidelines for these cancer patients regarding postoperative vitamin supplementation. METHODS: We conducted a metanalysis consisting of 10 studies regarding vitamin and micronutrient deficiencies after oncological gastric or esophageal resection. 5 databases were searched. RESULTS: Data was sufficient regarding Vitamins B12 and 25-OH D3 as well as calcium. We were able to show deficiencies in 25-OH Vitamin D3 levels (p < 0.001) and lower levels of Vitamin B12 and calcium (bit p < 0.001) when compared to the healthy population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from these groups are at risk for vitamin deficiencies. A guideline on postoperative supplementation is needed.
Asunto(s)
Avitaminosis , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Desnutrición , Obesidad Mórbida , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Calcio , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Vitaminas , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Vitamina B 12RESUMEN
Minimal-invasive resection of the esophagus for esophageal cancer has led to a relevant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Postoperatively, patients still suffer from surgical and adjuvant therapy-related symptoms impairing nutrition and quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional status and associated symptoms six months after esophagectomy. Patients who attended follow-up examination six months after minimal-invasive esophagectomy were included. Blood and fecal tests, quality of life surveys (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25) and nutritional risk screening (NRS) were performed. Twenty-four patients participated. The mean weight loss was 11 kg. A significant decrease in vitamin B12 (737 to 467 pg/mL; p = 0.033), ferritin (302 to 126 ng/mL; p = 0.012) and haptoglobin (227 to 152 mg/dL; p = 0.025) was found. In total, 47% of the patients had an impaired pancreatic function (fecal elastase < 500 µg/g). Physical (72 to 58; p = 0.034) and social functioning (67 to 40; p = 0.022) was significantly diminished, while self-reported global health status remained stable (52 to 54). The number of patients screened and found to be in need of nutritional support according to NRS score decreased slightly (59% to 52%). After MIE, patients should be meticulously monitored for nutritional status after surgery.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Colon conduit is an alternative to a gastric conduit for esophagectomy in patients that stomach is not available. Surgical technique is complex and has a high risk of morbidities and mortality. Outcomes of patients are still lacking in the literature, thus aims of this study are to evaluate the safety, feasibility and long-term functional outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent operation between August 2016 and June 2021 for malignancies. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and laparotomy were performed in accordance with the 2017 Japan Esophageal Society's guidelines. Colonic interposition was used for esophageal replacement. Outcomes were technical success, complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification, and patient's quality of life (QOL) based on EORTC-QOL-OES18 questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean age was 56.0 ± 9.9 years and 21 patients (80.8%) were men. Mean operating time was 432 ± 66 min. Technical success was 100%. The average number of resected lymph nodes was 26 ± 14. Twelve patients (46.2%) experienced postoperative complications: 7/12 were classified as grade I-II, 3/12 as grade III, 1/12 as grade IV, and 1/12 as grade V (death). Patient's QOL improved during the follow-up period with median (25-75th percentiles) global EORTC-QOL-OES18 score was 29 (17-34); 13 (9-21), and 9 (6-16) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, there were 4 late complications, 3 lymphatic recurrences, 5 distant metastases, and 6 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Colon conduit via retrosternal route after esophagectomy is feasible, safe, and could provide acceptable long-term functional outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Colon/patología , Colon/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Body weight loss and poor nutritional status are frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to pilot an investigation on the impact of home enteral tube feeding supplementation (HES) for up to 3 months after esophageal cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 67 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. We started HES from April 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Among 67 patients, 40 patients underwent HES between April 2017 and November 2020 (HES group). Other 27 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2012 and March 2017 were not administered HES (C group). Thereafter, multiple factors concerning patient nutritional status at long-term follow-up were evaluated. The baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in nutritional status scores before esophagectomy. The percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group both at 3 months and 1 year after surgery: 7.3% (-7.6 to 15.2), 7.7% (-4 to 13.9) in the HES group and 10.6% (-3.6 to 29.1), 10.8% (-5.8 to 20.0) in C group (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). In the patients with anastomotic stenosis, the percentage weight loss was less in the HES group compared with the C group: 7.2% (2.0-14.9) and 14.6% (6.2-29.1), P < 0.05. HES may improve early weight loss in postesophagectomy patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Nutrición Enteral , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Suplementos DietéticosRESUMEN
Background: Patients are prone to intestinal dysfunction after esophagectomy. The value of preoperative bowel preparation before esophagectomy is controversial. There is a lack of evidence as to whether preoperative bowel preparation can help patients improve bowel function and shorten the recovery time of bowel function. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to explore whether preoperative bowel preparation can promote the recovery of intestinal function after esophagectomy. Methods: We analysed 139 patients who underwent elective radical esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from May 2016 to December 2018. The enrolled patients were divided into the study group (bowel preparation group) and the control group (no bowel preparation group) of 71 cases and 68 cases. Patients in the study group were given dissolved polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and a cleansing enema the day before surgery. Patients in the control group were neither given polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder nor cleansing enemas before surgery. The postoperative recovery of the two groups were compared. Results: Postoperative bed rest time, bowel function recovery time and the time of first flatus and defecation after surgery were significantly shorter in patients with bowel preparation than in those without bowel preparation, and the differences were statistically significant. (P=0.038, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001; respectively). Conclusions: Preoperative bowel preparation can promote the recovery of patients with esophageal cancer, especially the recovery of bowel function, which can reduce the pain caused by abdominal distension and improve the quality of life of patients.
Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Polvos , Polietilenglicoles , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Electrólitos , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
Background: Advances in surgical, anesthesia, and nursing techniques have allowed the development of laparo-gastroscopic esophagectomy (LGE) as a minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study summarizes the experience of patient whole-process nursing management for patients who received LGE. Methods: The implementation of LGE at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, was initiated in June 2020. The procedure is indicated for patients with thoracic conditions that can compromise the outcomes of traditional surgical procedures, and is performed coordinately by thoracic surgeons and endoscopists. A whole-process nursing protocol covering peri-operative patient management was proposed based on the LGE procedure. The operative outcomes were analyzed in this study. Results: The data of 10 consecutive patients who received LGE and the whole-process nursing protocol were analyzed, and all patients were compliant with the nursing protocol. Intra-operatively, there were no complications or conversions to other surgical methods. Post-operatively, pulmonary complications occurred in 2 cases [1 patient experienced aspiration, underwent preventive tracheotomy, and was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 10; 1 patient developed a left pleural effusion requiring puncture and drainage, and was discharged on POD 7]. The 30-day mortality was not recorded from the primary LGE cohort. Conclusions: The whole-process nursing protocol showed safety and feasibility for patients who underwent LGE. In the future, more specialized and whole-process nursing management will be carried out for patients undergoing such operations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In addition to treating hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis, statins have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and antitumor activity in various cancers. We evaluate this effect in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center between March 2007 and December 2015 were included. Association between presurgery statin use and relevant variables with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed using Cox hazards. Survival analyses were independently performed for body mass index (BMI)-based subgroups. RESULTS: There was no significant association between statin use and outcomes overall. However, in subgroup analysis, there was significant association between statin use and outcomes in patients with BMI ≥ 30. Multivariable analysis in obese patients demonstrated the association of statins with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, p = 0.025), DSS (HR: 0.39, p = 0.015), and RFS (HR: 0.38, p = 0.022). The only other variable significantly associated with all three outcome measures was stage. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use is associated with improved OS, DSS, and RFS of obese patients in resected esophageal cancer. BMI could be investigated as a biomarker for adjunctive statin use in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, not much is known about HRQoL, particularly in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' outcome after non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with focus on HRQoL in the long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment, patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%), and a conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome and quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months. HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. CONCLUSION: HRQoL in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Perforación del Esófago , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Perforación del Esófago/etiología , Perforación del Esófago/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Standard minimally invasive McKeown three-field esophagectomy (SMIE) results in high perioperative risk and poor postoperative quality of life owing to considerable surgical damage and numerous postoperative complications. We created a modified procedure, functional minimally invasive esophagectomy (FMIE), which preserves the azygos arch, bronchial artery, pulmonary branch of the vagus nerve, and the mediastinal pleura. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMIE and to determine whether it has limited invasiveness. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, FMIE was performed for 48 patients who were compared with 76 SMIE cases; 44 paired cases were matched using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Operation time, extubation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly lower in the FMIE group. FMIE was also associated with fewer pulmonary infections. Postoperative drainage volume on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 2, and white blood cell counts on POD 2 and POD 4 were also significantly lower in the FMIE group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes, short-term recurrence, metastasis rates, or survival rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: FMIE is a less invasive procedure and may be a suitable alternative for lower and early middle esophageal carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The curative treatment for esophageal and gastric cancer is primarily surgical resection. One of the main complications related to esophagogastric surgery is the anastomotic leak. This complication is associated with a prolonged length of stay, reduced quality of life, high treatment costs, and an increased mortality rate. The placement of endoluminal stents is the most frequent endoscopic therapy in these cases. However, since its introduction, endoscopic vacuum therapy has been shown to be a promising alternative in the management of this complication. This study primarily aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies that evaluated the use of endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy were included. Twenty-three articles were included. A total of 559 patients were evaluated. Endoscopic vacuum therapy showed a fistulous orifice closure rate of 81.6% (rate: 0.816; 95% CI: 0.777-0.864) and, when compared to the stent, there is a 16% difference in favor of endoscopic vacuum therapy (risk difference [RD]: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.27). The risk for mortality in the endoscopic vacuum therapy was 10% lower than in endoluminal stent therapy (RD: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.02). Endoscopic vacuum therapy might have a higher rate of fistulous orifice closure and a lower rate of mortality, compared to intraluminal stenting.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Stents/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for cancer strongly impairs quality of life. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of the nutritional and respiratory counseling on postoperative quality of life. METHODS: At hospital discharge, patients were randomized into four groups receiving respectively: nutritional and respiratory counseling, nutritional counseling alone, respiratory counseling alone, or standard care. The main endpoint was the impairment in quality of life in the first month after surgery. Linear mixed effect models were estimated to assess mean score differences (MDs) in quality of life scores. RESULTS: Patients receiving nutritional counseling reported less appetite loss (MD - 17.7, 95% CI - 32.2 to -3.3) than those not receiving nutritional counseling at 1 month after surgery. Dyspnea was similar between patients receiving vs. those not receiving respiratory counseling (MD - 3.1, 95% CI - 10.8 to 4.6). Global quality of life was clinically similar between patients receiving vs. those not receiving nutritional counseling over time (MD 0.9, 95% CI - 5.5 to 7.3), as well as in patients receiving vs. those not receiving respiratory counseling over time (MD 0.7, 95% CI - 5.9 to 7.2). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive postoperative care does not affect global quality of life even if nutritional counseling reduced appetite loss.
Asunto(s)
Consejo/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/dietoterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/métodos , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Respiración/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, immunonutrition has been introduced and proposed to have a positive modulatory effect on inflammatory and immune responses and gut function for surgical patients, especially for patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer resection. We conducted this parallel-group, randomized and double-blind clinical controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of perioperative enteral immunonutrition (EIN) on clinical and immunological outcomes of patients undergoing esophageal resection. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted between December 1, 2017 and March 1, 2018. This study enrolled 120 patients with esophageal cancer. And 112 patients were divided into two groups randomly: EIN group and enteral nutrition (EN) group. The EIN contained extra immunonutritional substrates, including a consistent combination of arginine, RNA and the omega-3 fatty acids compared with EN. Immune indicators were measured at preoperative day 7, postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 7 and post-discharge day (PDD) 30. RESULTS: There were 56 participants randomized to each group. Finally, 53 patients in EIN and 50 patients in EN were analyzed. Immune indicator was the primary outcome in this study. EIN yielded a significantly lower rate of CD8/CD3 (%) at POD 3 compared with EN group (P=0.005). The rate of CD4/CD8 (%) in EIN group was higher than that in EN group at POD3 (P=0.004). The serum levels of IgM at POD 3 and 7 were significantly higher in EN group compared with EIN group (P=0.025 and P=0.009, respectively). The rate of NK (%) and the serum level of IgA were significantly higher in EIN group compared with EN group at PDD 30 (P=0.022 and P=0.041, respectively). No significant differences were found in 2-year progressionfree survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Immunonutrition is a safe and feasible nutritional treatment, which has a positive modulatory impact on immune responses after esophagectomy. Although no significant difference was found in clinical and survival outcomes between EIN and EN groups, immunonutrition could still have a positive effect on immunological function of patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Cuidados Posteriores , Nutrición Enteral , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is reported to affect postoperative complications and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical significance of PNI in treatment of ESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent radical esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed. PNI was calculated in the pretreatment (pre-Tx), post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (post-NAC), and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Pre-Tx PNI positively correlated with prognosis irrespective of undergoing NAC (p<0.05). In the patients with NAC, pre-Tx PNI was one of the independent prognostic factors (p=0.04). In patients with low pre-Tx PNI, the prognosis was improved by increase of PNI after NAC (p=0.08), and two cycles of NAC significantly correlated with high post-NAC PNI (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Pre-Tx PNI is an independent prognostic factor irrespective of NAC. Patients in whom the post-NAC PNI can be improved have a high probability of obtaining a good prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Evaluación Nutricional , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Achalasia is a primary motility disorder of the esophagus, and while there are several treatment options, there is no consensus regarding them. When therapeutic intervention for achalasia fails, a careful evaluation of the cause of the persistent or recurrent symptoms using upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and contrast radiologic studies is required to understand the cause of therapy failure and guide plans for subsequent treatment. Options for reintervention are the same as for primary intervention and include pneumatic dilation, botulinum toxin injection, peroral endoscopic myotomy, or redo esophageal myotomy. When reintervention fails or if the esophagus is not amenable to intervention and the disease is considered end-stage, esophagectomy is the last option to manage recurrent achalasia.
Asunto(s)
Acalasia del Esófago , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior , Esofagectomía , Esofagoscopía , Miotomía de Heller/efectos adversos , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Acalasia del Esófago/fisiopatología , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/fisiopatología , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/cirugía , Humanos , ManometríaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In recent years, home enteral nutrition (HEN) has been adopted as a feasible and safe form of nutrition for patients undergoing esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 4 wk of HEN with standard enteral nutrition (SEN) on immune function, nutritional status, and survival in patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: A parallel-group, randomized, single-blind, clinical trial was conducted between April 1 and August 1, 2017. Eighty patients were enrolled in the study and 62 were eligible for analysis. An enteral feeding pump was used to infuse enteral nutrition via jejunostomy tube postoperatively. Patients in HEN group were instructed to independently administer jejunostomy feeds at home. Immune parameters and nutritional indicators were measured at preoperative day 7 and at postoperative day 30. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG, which can reflect a patient's immune function, significantly increased in the HEN group compared with those in the SEN group (P = 0.042 and P = 0.003, respectively). Comparing the two groups, 2-y progression-free survival and overall survival had no significant differences in survival curves (P = 0.36 and P = 0.29, respectively). CONCLUSION: Four weeks of HEN is a safe and feasible nutritional strategy to improve immune function and nutritional status after esophagectomy. Although there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups, HEN could still be more effective and beneficial than SEN to patients with defective nutritional and immune status.
Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Esofagectomía , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Inmunidad , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Oesophageal cancer (OC) impacts nutritional status and outcomes. This study aims to benchmark the current nutrition management of patients with OC against best practice recommendations, identify critical points in the treatment trajectory where nutritional status is compromised, service gaps and opportunities for improvement. METHODS: A retrospective audit collected demographic, medical and nutritional data from medical records of patients who received curative treatment for OC at a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patient records were audited over the time period. Twenty-nine patients underwent nutrition screening on admission to the service. Eighteen out of 25 patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation therapy, all patients during surgical admission, and only 19 patients at postsurgical discharge were seen by a dietitian. All patients received tube feeding post-operatively; however, initiation within 24 h only occurred for 14 patients. Weight significantly declined over the course of treatment (p < 0.001), whilst malnutrition during surgical admission (p = 0.004) and postsurgical discharge (p = 0.038) were both associated with significantly higher unplanned readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Best practice recommendations were met for aspects of the immediate post-operative period; however, service gaps remain during pre-operative and post-discharge care. Findings from this study indicate that nutritional care is inconsistent across different treatment stages, and malnutrition impacts negatively on unplanned readmission. Research is needed to address evidence-practice gaps, assess appropriateness of recommendations and provide evidence for models of care during multimodality treatments and across different services.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/dietoterapia , Estado Nutricional/fisiología , Apoyo Nutricional/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Australia , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación Nutricional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased medical cost. Additionally, it sometimes leads to a fatal condition and impaired postoperative quality of life. During the process of wound healing, ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) is important for collagen biosynthesis. An open-label prospective intervention trial has been designed to evaluate the treatment effect of an enteral nutrient containing HMB with arginine and glutamine (Abound, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.) for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy. Patients in whom leakage at the anastomotic site developed within 14 days after esophagectomy are eligible and Abound (24 g) is administered for 14 days through an enteral feeding tube. The target sample size is 10. The primary endpoint is duration between diagnosis and cure of leakage. Surgical procedure, safety, length of fasting, drainage placement and hospital stay, and nutritional status are determined as secondary endpoints. A historical control consisting of 20 patients who had leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy between 2005 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital is compared with enrolled patients.
Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Nutrición Enteral , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Alimentos Formulados , Valeratos/administración & dosificación , Cicatrización de Heridas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alimentos Formulados/efectos adversos , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valeratos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Over the past decades, survival rates for patients with resectable esophageal cancer have improved significantly. Consequently, the sequelae of having a gastric conduit, such as development of micronutrient deficiencies, become increasingly apparent. This study investigated postoperative micronutrient trends in the follow-up of patients following a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for cancer. Patients were included if they had at least one postoperative evaluation of iron, ferritin, vitamins B1, B6, B12, D, folate or methylmalonic acid. Data were available in 83 of 95 patients. Of these, 78.3% (65/83) had at least one and 37.3% (31/83) had more than one micronutrient deficiency at a median of 6.1 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5.4-7.5) of follow-up. Similar to the results found in previous studies, most common deficiencies identified were: iron, vitamin B12 and vitamin D. In addition, folate deficiency and anemia were detected in a substantial amount of patients in this cohort. At 24.8 months (IQR 19.4-33.1) of follow-up, micronutrient deficiencies were still common, however, most deficiencies normalized following supplementation on indication. In conclusion, patients undergoing a MIE are at risk of developing micronutrient deficiencies as early as 6 up to 24 months after surgery and should therefore be routinely checked and supplemented when needed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Desnutrición/etiología , Micronutrientes/deficiencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Suplementos Dietéticos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/mortalidad , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Nutricional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Periodo Posoperatorio , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lymph node harvest during esophagectomy has been associated with improved survival for esophageal cancer but the value of enhanced lymph node harvest following complete pathologic response (pCR) is debated. This study investigated if increasing lymph node harvest in esophageal cancer patients with a pCR after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy is associated with improved survival. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Data Base for patients with esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2014 who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by esophagectomy found to have pCR. Multivariable Cox modeling was utilized to evaluate the impact of increasing lymph node counts on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 1373 patients met inclusion criteria. A National Comprehensive Cancer Network compliant lymphadenectomy of ≥15 nodes was associated with improved survival (66.7% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Cox modeling showed that the first node cutoff to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS was ≥7 nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.68-0.97; 5-year OS: 54.2%) with a trend of decreasing and statistically significant HRs until ≥25 nodes (HR, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.37-0.72; 5-year OS: 68.4%). CONCLUSIONS: High negative node counts after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy are associated with improved survival in patients with pCR.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracogastric-airway fistula (TGAF) post-thoracic surgery is a rare and challenging complication for esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of airway stenting for TGAF patients and find related factors coupled with healing of fistula. METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving patients with TGAF who were treated with airway stentings. Based on different TGAF locations and sizes on chest computed tomography, covered metallic or silicon airway stents were implanted to cover orifices under interventional bronchoscopy. TGAF healing was defined as the primary outcome, and complete sealing of TGAF as the second outcome. The predictors for TGAF healing were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 TGAF patients were included, of whom 7 received straight covered metallic stents, 5 straight silicon stents, 3 L-shaped covered metallic stents, 21 large Y-shaped covered metallic stents, 17 large Y-shaped silicon stents, and 5 with Y-shaped covered metallic stents. Healing was achieved in 20 (34.5%) patients, and complete sealing in 45 (77.6%) patients. There were no significant differences in healing rate and complete sealing rate between patients receiving metallic stents and those with silicon stents. In univariate analysis, lacking a previous history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy, nonmalignant fistulas, small fistulas, and shorter postesophagectomy duration were found associated with a higher rate of TGAF healing. Only shorter postesophagectomy duration was associated with TGAF healing in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Both silicon and covered metallic airway stenting are effective methods to close TGAF. A shorter postesophagectomy period may predict better TGAF healing. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.