Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain / Estudio en el mundo real sobre patrones de prueba de inestabilidad de microsatélites y deficiencia de reparación de desajustes en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico en España

Purpose: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be tested for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). We aimed to describe the dMMR/MSI-H testing practice in patients with mCRC in Spanish centers.Methods: Multicenter, observational retrospective study that included patients newly diagnosed with mCRC or who progressed to a metastatic stage from early/localized stages. Results: Three hundred patients were included in the study from May 2020 through May 2021, with a median age of 68 years, and two hundred twenty-five (75%) had stage IV disease at initial diagnosis; two hundred eighty-four patients received first-line treatment, and dMMR/MSI-H testing was performed in two hundred fifty-one (84%) patients. The results of the dMMR/MSI-H tests were available in 61 (24%) of 251 patients before the diagnosis of metastatic disease and in 191 (81%) of 236 evaluable patients for this outcome before the initiation of first-line treatment. Among the 244 patients who were tested for dMMR/MSI-H with IHC or PCR, 14 (6%) were MMR deficient. The most frequent type of first-line treatment was the combination of chemotherapy and biological agent, that was received by 71% and 50% of patients with MMR proficient and deficient tumors, respectively, followed by chemotherapy alone, received in over 20% of patients in each subgroup. Only 29% of dMMR/MSI-H tumors received first-line immunotherapy. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a high proportion of patients with mCRC are currently tested for dMMR/MSI-H in tertiary hospitals across Spain. However, there is still room for improvement until universal testing is achieved.(AU)

Integrated analysis of NET-DNA receptor CCDC25 in malignant tumors: Pan-cancer analysis.

Background: Previously, it was reported that the coiled-coil domain containing 25 (CCDC25) plays a role in the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). This study systematically analyzed the expression profiles of CCDC25 in 30 different types of cancer and one type of blood cancer, acute myeloid leukemia. Methods: The GTEx and CCLE databases were used to evaluate the distribution of CCDC25 expression in both normal tissue and cancer cell lines. A comparison was performed between normal tissue and tumor tissue to analyze the differential expression of CCDC25. We assessed the impact of CCDC25 on the clinical outlook in the TCGA pan-cancer data set by analyzing the Kaplan-Meier survival plot and conducting COX regression analysis. Moreover, the association between the expression levels of CCDC25 and the tumor microenvironment in multiple cancers was conducted. Additionally, the investigation also examined the link between CCDC25 and immune neoantigen, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, mismatch repair genes (MMRs), HLA-related genes, and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT). Results: CCDC25 was expressed in nearly all of the 31 normal tissues while exhibiting a moderate to low level of expression in cancer cell lines. While abnormal expression was detected in the majority of malignancies, there was no link found between elevated CCDC25 levels and overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-free interval in the TCGA comprehensive cancer data set. Nevertheless, the expression of CCDC25 exhibited a notable link with the infiltration levels of activated CD4 memory T cells, quiescent mast cells, dendritic cells in an activated state, T cells that assist in follicle development, M2 macrophages, and neutrophils in various tumors. Conclusions: In most cancers, the results indicate that there is no link between CCDC25 and prognosis. However, CCDC25 can be targeted for therapeutic purposes concerning metastasis and immune infiltration.

BAT26 Only Microsatellite Instability with High Tumor Mutation Burden-A Rare Entity Associated with PTEN Protein Loss and High PD-L1 Expression.

Detecting microsatellite instability (MSI) in advanced cancers is crucial for clinical decision-making, as it helps in identifying patients with differential treatment responses and prognoses. BAT26 is a highly sensitive MSI marker that defines the mismatch repair (MMR) status with high sensitivity and specificity. However, isolated BAT26-only instability is rare and has not been previously reported. Of the 6476 cases tested using pentaplex MSI polymerase chain reaction, we identified two BAT26-only instability cases (0.03%) in this study. The case #1 patient was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma without MMR germline mutations. The endometrial tumor showed BAT26-only instability, partial loss of MLH1/PMS2 protein expression, and a high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS = 8). The tumor exhibited a somatic phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) R303P missense mutation and loss of the PTEN protein. On a comprehensive cancer panel sequencing with ≥500 genes, the tumor showed an MSI score of 11.38% and high tumor mutation burden (TMB) (19.5 mt/mb). The case #2 patient was diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma with proficient MMR and PTEN protein loss without PTEN alteration, as well as a high PD-L1 CPS (CPS = 10). A pathogenic KRAS A146T mutation was detected with an MSI score of 3.36% and high TMB (13 mt/mb). In conclusion, BAT26-only instability is very rare and associated with PTEN protein loss, high TMB, and a high PD-L1 score. Our results suggest that patients with BAT26-only instability may show good responses to immunotherapy.

Comparative analysis of microsatellite instability by next-generation sequencing, MSI PCR and MMR immunohistochemistry in 1942 solid cancers.

Checkpoint inhibitor approval for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours has made MSI as a therapeutically important biomarker. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MSI detection is being widely used for assessing MSI. However, MSI tumours detected using NGS and their relevance to MSI-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) are unclear. In 1942 solid cancer cases tested using NGS-based comprehensive cancer panel with 523 genes (1.94 mb), the MSI score, tumour mutation burden (TMB; ≥ 10 mutations/mb), and frameshift mutations were analysed. GeneScan analyses of five mononucleotide markers (MSI-PCR) and MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) were compared with the NGS-MSI results. With a ≥ 12% MSI score as a cut-off for MSI-H, two MSS cases were classified as MSI-H. With a ≥ 20% cut-off, 10 cases categorised as MSS by NGS were MSI-H/dMMR by MSI-PCR and MMR IHC. To avoid discrepant cases, we adopted a high MSI cut-off and a borderline MSI category. Finally, MSI-H (≥ 20%), borderline MSI (≥ 7% and < 20%), and MSS (< 7%) were found in 35 (1.8%), 24 (1.2%), and 1883 (97%) cases, respectively. All MSI-H cases by NGS were MSI-H/dMMR by MSI-PCR and MMR IHC. Of the 24 borderline MSI cases by NGS, MSI-H/dMMR was 9 (37.5%) cases, MSS/dMMR was 1 (4.2%) case, and 11 (45.8%) of them had high TMB. All MSS cases by NGS were MSS/pMMR by MSI-PCR/IHC, and 257 (13.6%) had high TMB. With those arbitrary cut-off points, 10 (0.5%) MSS cases using NGS were discrepant with MSI-PCR or MMR IHC, and all were borderline MSI cases. The mean number of frameshift mutations was significantly higher in the MSI-H group (28.3) than in the borderline MSI (7.7) or MSS (1.3) groups (p < 0.001). In conclusion, to facilitate therapeutic decision-making for NGS, cut-off points for MSI can be defined based on MSI-PCR/dMMR confirmation.

Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal (CRC) and endometrial (EC) cancers. Universal tumor screening (UTS) of all individuals diagnosed with CRC and EC is recommended to increase identification of LS. Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) implemented a UTS program for LS among individuals newly diagnosed with CRC in January 2016 and EC in November 2016. UTS at KPNW begins with immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tumor tissue to determine loss of mismatch repair proteins associated with LS (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2)., IHC showing loss of MLH1 is followed by reflex testing (automatic testing) to detect the presence of the BRAF V600E variant (in cases of CRC) and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation to rule out likely sporadic cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals newly diagnosed with CRC and EC were identified between the initiation of the respective UTS programs and July 2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract patient data related to UTS, including IHC and reflex testing results, date of referrals to the genetics department, and results of germline genetic testing for LS. RESULTS: 313 out of 362 individuals diagnosed with CRC and 61 out of 64 individuals diagnosed with EC who were eligible were screened by IHC for LS. Most (47/52 or 90%, including 46/49 CRC and 1/3 EC) individuals that were not screened by IHC only had a biopsy sample available. Fourteen individuals (3.7% overall, including 13/313 CRC and 1/61 EC) received an abnormal result after reflex testing and were referred for genetic counseling. Of these, 10 individuals (71% overall, including 9/13 CRC and 1/1 EC) underwent germline genetic testing for LS. Five individuals diagnosed with CRC were found to have pathogenic variants. in PMS2 (n = 3), MLH1 (n = 1), and MSH6 (n = 1). No pathogenic variants were identified in individuals diagnosed with EC. CONCLUSIONS: UTS identified individuals at risk for LS. Most individuals who screened positive for LS had follow-up germline genetic testing for LS. The consistent use of biopsy samples is an opportunity to improve UTS.

Analysis of microsatellite instability using Promega panel in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare neoplasm derived from fibroblasts. Although the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) in skin cancer is reported to be less than 5%, there is only one report of the status of MMR in DFSP. The only analytical report of microsatellite stability in which Promega panel is not used, showed that the frequency of MSI-high, MSI-low and microsatellite stable (MSS) cases was 13.9% (5/36), 16.7% (6/36) and 69.4% (25/36), respectively. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the status of MMR in 36 patients with DFSP diagnosed at Kumamoto University. MSI analysis using the Promega panel showed that all cases were MSS, which indicated the absence of MSI in DFSP. This result indicates that the status of MMR may not be useful for the potential therapeutic application of pembrolizumab and the pathogenesis of DFSP may not involve MSI.

The View of Turkish Oncologists Regarding MSI Status and Tumor Localization in Stage II and III Colon Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although several clinical factors which show the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in early-stage colon cancer use for evaluating the risk of relapse, there is no consensus on which risk factors are more reliable. In this study, we evaluated both the utility of MSI and the daily practice of the Turkish oncologists in stage II and III colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an online questionnaire which was consisting of twenty questions including the treatment choices and duration about stage II-III colon cancer depending on sidedness and risk factors for relapse. RESULTS: More than 65% of the oncologists declared the use of MSI testing in stage II colon cancer without considering any risk factors. In stage 3 colon cancer oncologists had an equal decision "to do or not to do" in MSI testing. More than 50% of the oncologists had preferred XELOX protocol in high-risk stage II (T4N0) colon cancer, while three out of four preferred observation in low-risk stage II (T3N0) patients without risk factors. Two-thirds of the oncologists had preferred 6 months of treatment in stage II colon cancer with at least one risk factor. CONCLUSION: Turkish oncologists participating to this trial had declared conflicting results about adjuvant treatment in early-stage colorectal cancer in their daily practice compared with the updated guidelines, especially, MSI evaluation utility in stage III colon cancers, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) duration, and oxaliplatin adding to AC in elderly and stage II patients.

Adjuvant treatment of colon cancer with microsatellite instability - the state of the art.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus oxaliplatin in stage III resected colorecatal cancer (RCRC) resulted in a 30% relative reduction of disease recurrence risk and mortality. The presence of altered mismatch repair genes identify tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) that have a better prognosis than stable tumors, but data about adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in this subgroup are compelling. We investigate the role of adjuvant therapy in resected MSI RCRC. The standard treatment is the association of FP plus oxaliplatin, while it can avoided in low risk stage II, thanks to its good prognosis. We propose a practice strategy to approach MSI RCRC in line with the current knowledge. In consideration of the dramatic results in chemorefractory MSI metastatic CRC, there are assumptions that immunotherapy can become a potential alternative to classical systemic therapies also in the adjuvant setting. We await the results of ongoing studies to draw further conclusions."

Pharmacotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a poor prognosis. Emerging treatment paradigms have improved outcomes in selected unresectable mCRC cases. Recent therapeutic advancements are due in part to a shift in trial designs. By examining CRC as a heterogeneous group of various tumor subtypes, researchers have identified molecular distinctions that have led to promising targets. AREAS COVERED: Nineteen antineoplastic agents are included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the palliative management of mCRC. However, not all patients will be candidates for each agent. New therapies for rare mCRC subtypes have emerged. Herein, the authors review these rare mCRC subtypes: microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair, BRAFV600E-mutant, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumors. Additionally, they provide an overview of unresectable mCRC management and future directions. EXPERT OPINION: Treatment in the majority of mCRC patients (RAS wild-type or RAS-mutant, microsatellite instability-stable or -low/mismatch repair-proficient, BRAFV600E wild-type, or HER2-negative) needs further advancement and remains an unmet need. The authors believe that the key to identifying more breakthroughs in these mCRC patients is to continue to differentiate their tumors molecularly and clinically.

PD-L1 Expression Is Significantly Associated with Tumor Mutation Burden and Microsatellite Instability Score.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutation burden (TMB) have been proposed as a predictive biomarker to predict response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We aimed to find the relationship of PD-L1 IHC to TMB and MSI using a comprehensive cancer panel assay (CCPA) with >500 genes in advanced cancer patients. CCPA results from 588 archived tissue samples were analyzed for TMB and MSI. In seven samples, whole exome sequencing confirmed TMB with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.972 and all MSI-high cases were validated by pentaplex PCR. Association of TMB and MSI with their corresponding PD-L1 IHC was analyzed. The median TMB value of 588 cases was 8.25 mutations (mut)/Mb (range 0-426.8) with different distributions among the tumor types, with high proportions of high-TMB (>10mut/Mb) in tumors from melanoma, colorectal, gastric, and biliary tract. The TMB values significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression, and this correlation was prominent in gastric and biliary tract cancers. Moreover, the MSI score, the proportion of unstable MSI sites to total assessed MSI sites, showed a significant correlation with the TMB values and PD-L1 scores. This study demonstrates that PD-L1 expression is significantly associated with TMB and MSI score and this correlation depends on the location of the primary tumor.

Occurrence of High Microsatellite-Instability/Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Nearly 2,000 Human Adenocarcinomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Pancreas, and Bile Ducts: A Study From a Large German Comprehensive Cancer Center.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the high microsatellite-instability (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) status is of increasing interest for personalized neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy planning. Only a few studies are available on MSI-H distribution in the Northern European Caucasian patient population. In this study, we focused on a large cohort of tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical material from a total of 1,965 patients was analyzed for MSI-H/MMRd status (including 1,267 carcinomas of the esophagus or stomach). All tumors were analyzed with an internationally recommended immunohistochemical panel consisting of four antibodies (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6). The results were molecularly objectified. RESULTS: Adenocarcinomas with MSI-H/MMRd were detected with the following distribution: esophagus (1.4%), stomach (8.3%), small intestine (18.2%), large intestine (8.5%), intrahepatic bile ducts (1.9%), and pancreas (0%). In case of gastric tumors with MSI-H/MMRd, neoadjuvant therapy did not influence the prognosis of patients (p = 0.94). Within all tumor entities with MSI-H/MMRd, patients with a UICC stage 4 were also represented. In this advanced stage, 11.7% of patients with MSS tumors were diagnosed compared to 0.5% of patients with MSI-H tumors relative to the entire tumor collective. DISCUSSION: In this study, the proportion of MSI-H/MMRd tumors in the stomach is smaller than would have been expected in knowledge of the data published by TCGA or AGRC. Negative prognostic effects regarding MSI-H status and neoadjuvant therapy as described by the MAGIC study group were not seen in our cohort. The extent to which the MSI-H/MMRd status should be known for neoadjuvant therapy planning must be clarified in prospective studies in the future. At present, there is no convincing data to dispense the neoadjuvant therapy for gastric carcinoma. Due to the very convincing, positive data regarding the response rates of MSI-H tumors to treatment with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors, every metastatic carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract should be tested for its MSI-H status.

Determination of therapeutic agents efficiencies of microsatellite instability high colon cancer cells in post-metastatic liver biochip modeling.

Two distinct genetic mutational pathways characterized by either chromosomal instability or high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are recognized in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, it has been shown that patients with primary CRC that displays MSI-H have a significant, stage-independent, multivariate survival advantage. Biological properties of CMS1 (MSI-H type) can affect therapeutic efficiencies of agents used in the treatment of CRC, and therefore become a new predictive factor of the treatment. But, the predictive impact of MSI-H status for adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. This study will assess whether there is any unnecessary or inappropriate use of treatment agents recommended for adjuvant therapy of stage 2 and 3 of disease and for palliative or curative treatment of liver metastatic disease in microsatellite instability high group, a molecular subtype of colon cancer. Within this scope, the efficiencies of fluorouracil- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapeutic agents will be shown on stage 3 microsatellite instability high colon tumor cell lines first, and then a microfluidic model will be created, imitating the metastasis of colon cancer to the liver. In the microfluidic chip model, we will create in liver tissue, where the metastasis of microsatellite instability high colon cancer will be simulated; the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents, immunotherapy agents, and targeted agents on tumor cells as well as drug response will be assessed according to cell viability through released biomarkers from the cells. The proposed hypothesis study includes the modeling and treatment of patient-derived post-metastatic liver cancer in microfluidics which has priority at the global and our region and consequently develop personal medication.

Impact of microsatellite status on negative lymph node count and prognostic relevance after curative gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype on lymph node yield after lymphadenectomy has never been discussed in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we aimed to assess the association of microsatellite status with negative lymph node count (NLNC) as well as its prognostic value. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1491 GC patients and divided them into two groups: MSI-HGC (n = 141 [9.5%]) and microsatellite stability (MSSGC ) (n = 1350 [90.5%]). The NLNC and survival data were compared between the two groups. The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to negative LNs and the target lymph node examined threshold (TLNT) were calculated in both groups. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found in median NLNC (26 vs. 23, p < .001) between MSI-HGC and MSSGC patients. MSI status was an independent factor for NLNC (p < .001). NLNC showed positive prognostic value for cases with metastatic lymph node (LN+ ) in both MSI-HGC and MSSGC groups. The TLNT(90%) for MSI-HGC and MSSGC were 33 and 26, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MSI-HGC was associated with higher NLNC in GC patients and this was independent of the presence of LN+ . However, more LNs are needed during pathological examination to capture LN+ cases in MSI-HGC.

Prognostic variables in low and high risk stage III colon cancers treated in two adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

BACKGROUND: Stratification of patients with stage III colon cancer into low (T1-3N1) and high (T4 and/or N2) risk groups is used to guide the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy. We determined the relative contribution of clinical and molecular features to survival by risk group. MATERIALS & METHODS: Stage III colon cancer (N = 5337) patients from two adjuvant trials of FOLFOX ± cetuximab [N0147 (Alliance), PETACC-8] were risk grouped, then subgrouped by clinical features and molecular variables [KRAS and BRAF/mismatch repair (MMR) combined variable]. Distributions of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were estimated. In multivariable Cox models, backward elimination was performed for analysis of candidate predictors of outcomes. Relative contributions of model-selected variables to outcomes by risk group were calculated using χ2. RESULTS: Among low risk tumours, mutant KRAS and male gender were significantly associated with poorer OS multivariately. In high risk tumours, significantly poorer OS was observed for right sidedness and for mutant KRAS and BRAFV600E/pMMR, subgroups. Specifically, BRAFV600E/pMMR (OS: HR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.36-2.24; Padj<.0001) and right- versus left-sidedness were associated with significantly poorer DFS, OS (HR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.31-1.83; Padj<.0001), and SAR (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.37-1.95; Padj<.0001). Poor prognosis of mutant KRAS for DFS and OS was similar among risk groups. BRAF/MMR and sidedness were associated with poorer SAR in both low and high risk tumours. Age, gender, and KRAS were the top three relative contributors to DFS and OS among low risk tumours; sidedness ranked first for DFS and OS, and second to BRAF/MMR for SAR among high risk tumours. CONCLUSION: Sidedness and BRAF/MMR contributed the most to survival outcomes among high risk tumours and should be interpreted in the context of risk group.

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Frequent overtreatment or meaningful concept?] / Neoadjuvante Chemotherapie beim Magenkarzinom. Vielfach eine Übertherapie oder ein sinnvolles Konzept?

Neoadjuvant or perioperative therapy with radical surgery is a meaningful approach to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer. The FLOT regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) has been established as a perioperative concept in Germany and is also increasingly being used internationally. The prognostic significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has to be awaited based on the results of currently active studies. The microsatellite instability (MSI) status has increasingly gained in importance with respect to decision-making processes in the interdisciplinary tumor board as patients with MSI tumors probably do not benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with only initial stages of locally advanced MSI tumors (cT2, N0) and those with comorbidities could be spared from neoadjuvant therapy. This article critically deals with the current state of the art concepts as well as with ongoing studies with respect to neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment of gastric cancer. For this purpose, the essential already published and the active studies are presented.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of Microsatellite Instability, Inflammatory Reaction and PD-L1 in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Either Adjuvant 5-FU/LV or Sequential FOLFIRI Followed by Cisplatin and Docetaxel: A Translational Analysis from the ITACA-S Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer (GC) show improved survival and no benefit or harm from adjuvant and/or perioperative chemotherapy. The role of immune microenvironment in GC is largely unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, 256 tumor tissue blocks were centrally collected from patients enrolled in ITACA-S, a randomized adjuvant trial of 5-FU/LV versus sequential FOLFIRI and cisplatin-docetaxel. MSI status was assessed by multiplex PCR, inflammatory reaction by H&E morphological assessment, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Overall, 9% patients had MSI-high tumors, 23% had high inflammatory reaction, 11% had tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%, and 11% had stromal PD-L1 ≥ 1%. A significant association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI-high (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; p = .02; HR, 0.40; p = .02) and high inflammatory reaction (HR, 0.55; p = .010; HR, 0.53; p = .008) but not for PD-L1. At multivariable analysis, only MSI showed an independent association with both DFS (p = .02) and OS (p = .01), whereas inflammatory reaction showed an independent association only with OS (p = .04). Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% had a significantly longer DFS in sequential chemotherapy than in than 5-FU/LV arm (interaction p = .04) and a trend for OS (interaction p = .12). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MSI status could be a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with radically resected stage II-III GC and should be used as stratification factor in future trials. Tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% should be further investigated as a potential predictor of benefit from intensive chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this post hoc analysis of patients with radically resected gastric cancer randomized to an intensive sequential chemotherapy regimen versus 5-FU/LV monotherapy as adjuvant treatment in the ITACA-S trial, MSI-high status was independently associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) and inflammatory reaction was independently associated with better OS. Moreover, tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% was associated with greater benefit from intensive sequential chemotherapy compared with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV), whereas PD-L1 expression <1% was not, conditioning a statistically significant interaction between such biomarker and treatment arms. The meta-analysis of individual patients' data from available studies could yield data on the role of MSI status that could inform clinical decisions.

Somatic Mutations and Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Cancer-Related Genes NLK, YY1 and PA2G4 in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers.

Many genes act as both tumor suppressor gene (TSG) and proto-oncogene depending on cellular context and cancer type. Nemo-like kinase (NLK) encoding a serine/threonine kinase, Yin Yang 1 (YY1) encoding a zinc-finger transcription factor and PA2G4 encoding an ErbB3 binding protein have both of these two opposing functions. In the present study, we analyzed NLK, YY1 and PA2G4 frameshift mutations in sporadic GC and CRC with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Also, regional intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of frameshift mutations of these genes was analyzed in CRCs. We found frameshift mutations of NLK, YY1 and PA2G4 in CRC and GC with MSI-H (17/132: 12.9%), but not in those with MSS (0/90). Two (12.5%), one (6.3%) and one (6.3%) CRC (s) of the 16 CRCs exhibited ITH of NLK, YY1 and PA2G4 mutations among the 4-7 regions, suggesting that ITH of the frameshift mutations might be frequent in the CRCs. These results suggest that frameshift mutations of NLK, YY1 and PA2G4 along with the ITH might contribute to MSI-H cancer pathogenesis.

Microsatellite instability and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy among stage II and III colon cancer patients: results from a population-based study.

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the benefit of administering 5-FU-based chemotherapy to colon cancer (CC) patients with microsatellite-instable (MSI-high) tumors, and results from stage-specific analyses are scarce. Patients with stage II or III CC were recruited as part of a population-based study between 2003 and 2015. The Cox regression models including propensity score weighting were used to calculate hazard ratios and confidence intervals for the association between chemotherapy and cancer-specific (CSS), relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) by stage of disease and MSI status of the tumor. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. A total of 1010 CC patients were included in the analysis (54% stage II, 46% stage III, 20% MSI-high). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 48 (8.7%) stage II and 366 (79%) stage III patients. Overall, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better CSS [HR = 0.65 (0.49-0.86)] than those who received surgery alone. Among stage II patients, only 64 (12%) cancer-related deaths occurred, none of which in MSI-high patients who received chemotherapy. Patients with MSI-high tumors who received adjuvant treatment showed better CSS and a tendency toward better RFS compared to MSI-high patients who did not receive chemotherapy [HRCSS  = 0.36 (0.15-0.82), HRRFS  = 0.49 (0.22-1.06)]. Patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy also had significantly better survival [HRCSS  = 0.65 (0.48-0.87) and HRRFS  = 0.68 (0.52-0.88)]. In this population-based study including stage II and III CC patients, we observed a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for both MSS and MSI-high tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be beneficial among high-risk stage II patients with MSI-high tumors.

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence following adjuvant treatment: results of an ACCENT pooled analysis of seven studies.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to have a poor prognosis. Frequent co-occurrence of MSI/dMMR and BRAFV600E complicates the association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from seven adjuvant studies with available data for disease recurrence and MMR and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary end point was survival after recurrence (SAR). Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, performance status, T stage, N stage, primary tumor location, grade, KRAS status, and timing of recurrence. RESULTS: Among 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19-85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI/dMMR tumors had significantly longer SAR than did patients with microsatellite stable/proficient MMR tumors (MSS/pMMR) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.69-0.98; P = 0.029). This finding remained when looking at patients treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens only (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-1.00; P = 0.048). Same trends for SAR were observed when analyzing MSI/dMMR versus MSS/pMMR tumor subgroups lacking BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.84; P = 0.10) or those harboring BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.88; P = 0.43), without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, SAR was significantly shorter in tumors with BRAFV600E versus those lacking this mutation (aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73-2.46; P < 0.0001), even in the subgroup of MSI/dMMR tumors (aHR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.67-4.21; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with a shorter SAR were as follows: older age, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In stage III CC patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy, and before the era of immunotherapy, the MSI/dMMR phenotype was associated with a better SAR compared with MSS/pMMR. BRAFV600E mutation was a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCT00079274, NCT00265811, NCT00004931, NCT00004931, NCT00026273, NCT00096278, NCT00112918.

Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Testing Practices among US Physicians Treating Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

The study objective was to assess US physicians' Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability (MMR/MSI) testing practices for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. A non-interventional, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 151 physicians (91 oncologists, 15 surgeons and 45 pathologists) treating mCRC patients in the US. Eligible physicians were US-based with at least 5 years of experience treating CRC patients, had at least one mCRC patient in their routine care in the past 6 months, and had ordered at least one MMR/MSI test for CRC in the past 6 months. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. Awareness of specific MMR/MSI testing guidelines was high (n = 127, 84.1%). Of those, 93.7% (119/127) physicians had awareness of specific published guidelines with majority 67.2% (80/119) being aware of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Universal testing for all CRC patients was performed by 68.9% (104/151) physicians, while 29.8% (45/151) selectively order the test for some CRC patients. Key barriers for testing included insufficient tissue sample (48.3%, 73/151), patient declined to have the test done (35.8%, 54/151) and insurance cost concerns for patients (31.1%, 47/151), while 27.2% (41/151) reported no barriers. The survey demonstrated high awareness and compliance with MMR/MSI testing guidelines although universal testing rates seem to be suboptimal.