Predictive factors of non-completion of cytoreductive surgery in colorectal peritoneal metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the only potentially curative treatment that can improve the survival prognosis for patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal origin. The main independent prognostic factors are extent of disease, as measured by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and completion of CRS (CC-0 or R1). Despite thorough preoperative work-up for selection of surgical candidates, 20%-25 % of CRS procedures are stopped after exploration during laparotomy. These patients undergo "open-and-close" procedures associated with a risk of complications and without any benefit. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of non-resectability and/or non-completion of CRS in patients with colorectal PMs who were candidates for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, monocentric study including patients admitted for CRS ± HIPEC at the Jules Bordet Institute between January 01, 2010 and December 31, 2021. The preoperative epidemiological, pathological, clinical, radiological, and biological features of patients with unresectable disease were compared with those of patients treated with CRS. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were included, 60 men and 59 women (median age 61 years). Twenty-one CRS procedures (17.65 %) were stopped during exploratory laparotomy. Statistically significant factors associated with non-completion were age (p = 0.0183), PCI (p = 0.0001), presence of sub/occlusive episode(s) prior to CRS (p = 0.0012), and multifocal-diffuse uptakes on PET-scan (p = 0.0017). CONCLUSION: Almost 18 % of patients had an "open-and-close" procedure. PCI was the major determinant of non-completion of CRS. Other predictive factors of unresectability of colorectal PM were age, the presence of sub/occlusive episodes, and PET/CT with multiple peritoneal uptakes.

Is it justified to assess the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with biological and conditional factors?

Background: This study aimed to investigate the biological and conditional resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), as well as to identify the role of biological and conditional factors in assessing the resectability of PDAC. Methods: The clinical data of PDAC patients who underwent upfront open/laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD/LPD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP/LDP) at our hospital between January 2013 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with anatomically resectable PDAC, as defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline of PDAC guideline Version 1.2020, were enrolled. Based on IAP-criteria, these patients were divided into two groups, including IAP-resectable (IAP-R) and IAP Borderline Resectable (IAP-BR). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. In order to identify independent biological and conditional predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of enrolled patients, an analysis was performed through the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: Overall, 97 patients were included in this study. Among them, 38 patients were IAP-R and 59 patients were IAP-BR. Compared to the IAP-R group, the IAP-BR group had a higher early recurrence rate (62.7% vs. 42.1%; P=0.047), and the median RFS (9.2 vs. 18.3 months, P<0.01) and OS (19.1 vs. 30.6 months, P<0.05) were also significantly worse. Preoperative CA19-9 serum levels that exceeded 500 U/mL and/or an imaging diagnosis of regional lymph nodes metastasis were independently associated with OS and RFS of anatomically resectable PDAC. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with PDAC that undergo resection can be predicted more accurately by assessing the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with anatomical and biological factors according to IAP criteria. Whether conditional factors should be included in the resectability criteria needs to be validated by prospective and large cohorts.

Neo-adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgery and systemic therapy provide the best option for long-term cancer control in localized resectable pancreas cancer. The present study assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreas cancer (PDAC). METHODS: This was a prospective noninterventional observational trial of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in BR and LA PDAC. The primary objective was the R0/R1 surgical resection rate. Secondary objectives included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), tolerability, and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2019; the majority had LA disease (59.2%). Median age was 61 years, and median Ca 19-9 level pretreatment was 523.4 µmol/L. Following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, 11 patients (22.5%) underwent surgical resection, the majority of which were BR at diagnosis (72.7%). Median OS and PFS for the entire group were 25 (95% CI: 17.2-32.8) and 12 months (95% CI: 9.7-13.3), respectively. Median PFS in BR patients was 14 (95% CI: 10.5-17.5) compared to 12 months (95% CI: 5.2-18.8) in patients with LA patients. Median OS and PFS were not reached in patients who underwent surgical resection as compared to 22 (95% CI: 18.6-25.4) and 9 months (95% CI: 4.2-13.9) in those who did not, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, neuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea occurred in 6.3%, 2.1%, 10.4%, 4.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX is an active regimen for patients with LA/BR PDAC with a resection rate of 22.5%. These results are in line with prior data.

New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS).

The symposium "New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer" was held during the 33nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) in 2021 to discuss the potential modifications that could be made in the current resectability classification. The meeting focused on setting the foundation for developing a new prognosis-based resectability classification that is based on the tumor biology and the response to neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The symposium included selected experts from Western and Eastern high-volume centers who have discussed their concept of resectability status through published literature. During the symposium, presenters reported new resectability classifications from their respective institutions based on tumor biology, conditional status, pathology, and genetics, in addition to anatomical tumor involvement. Interestingly, experts from all the centers reached the agreement that anatomy alone is insufficient to define resectability in the current era of effective NAT. On behalf of the JSHBPS, we would like to summarize the content of the conference in this position paper. We also invite global experts as internal reviewers of this paper for intercontinental cooperation in creating an up-to-date, prognosis-based resectability classification that reflects the trends of contemporary clinical practice.

Surgery for pancreatic tumors in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic.

The spread of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) infection in 2020 has had a significant impact on the treatment of cancer worldwide. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the biggest challenge for pancreatic surgeons is the difficulty in providing oncological care. In this review article, from the standpoint of surgeons, we explain the concept of triaging of patients with pancreatic tumors under the COVID-19 pandemic, and the actual impact of COVID-19 on the treatment of patients with pancreatic tumors. The most vital points in selecting the best therapeutic approach for patients with pancreatic tumors during this pandemic are (1) Oncologists need to tailor the treatment plan based on the COVID-19 phase, tumor malignant potential, and patients' comorbidities; and (2) Optimal treatment for pancreatic cancer should be planned according to the condition of each patient and tumor resectability based on national comprehensive cancer network resectability criteria. To choose the best therapeutic approach for patients with pancreatic tumors during this pandemic, we need to tailor the treatment plan based on elective surgery acuity scale (ESAS). Newly established ESAS for pancreatic tumor and flowchart indicating the treatment strategy of pancreatic cancer, are feasible to overcome this situation.

Two-step cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei with high peritoneal carcinomatosis index.

BACKGROUND: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the only curative treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from the appendix. High peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to present the results of a planned two-step surgical strategy to decrease postoperative morbidity and improve resectability of patients with very high PCI. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent a planned two-step surgical approach for PMP between January 2012 and March 2020 were retrospectively included. This approach was offered for patients with low-grade PMP with PCI > 28 for which feasibility of a complete CRS in one operation was uncertain. The first surgery included a complete CRS of the inframesocolic compartment and omentectomy. HIPEC was delivered at the second surgery, after complete CRS of the supramesocolic compartment. Postoperative morbidity was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification and survival results were also collected. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent the two-step approach. The median PCI was 33 (29-39) and the median time between the two procedures was 111 days (90-212 days). One patient was deemed unresectable at the second surgery. The rate of major morbidity was 0% for the first step and 25% for the second step, with no mortality. Median follow-up was 53.8 months (3-73 months). CONCLUSION: A two-step surgical management for low-grade PMP patients with very high PCI is safe and feasible, with acceptable postoperative morbidity and no compromise on oncological outcomes.

Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer Is in the Eye of the Observer: A Multicenter, Blinded, Prospective Assessment of Interobserver Agreement on NCCN Resectability Status Criteria.

Objectives: To determine the reproducibility of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) resectability status classification for pancreatic cancer. Background: The NCCN classification defines 3 resectability classes (resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced), according to vascular invasion. It is used to recommend different approaches and stratify patients during clinical trials. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, observational study (trial ID: NCT03673423). Main outcome measure was the interobserver agreement of tumor assignment to different resectability classes and quantification of vascular invasion degrees. Agreement was measured by Fleiss' k (k = 1 perfect agreement; k = 0 agreement by chance). Sixty-nine computed tomography (CT) scans of pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were independently reviewed in a blinded fashion by 22 observers from 11 hospitals (11 surgeons and 11 radiologists). Rating differences between surgeons or radiologists and between hospitals with different volumes (≥60 or <60 resections/year) were assessed. Results: Complete agreement among 22 observers was recorded in 5 CT scans (7.2%), whereas 25 CT scans (36.2%) were variously assigned to all 3 resectability classes. Interobserver agreement varied from fair to moderate (Fleiss' k range: 0.282-0.555), with the lowest agreement for borderline resectable tumors. Assessing vascular contact ≤180° had the lowest agreement for all vessels (k range: 0.196-0.362). The highest concordance was recorded for venous invasion >180° (k range: 0.619-0.756). Neither reviewers' specialty nor hospital volume influenced the agreement. Conclusions: There is high variability in the assignment to resectability categories, which may compromise the reliability of treatments recommendations and the evidence of trials stratifying patients in resectability classes. Criteria should be revised to allow a reproducible classification.

Modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network Criteria for Assessing Resectability of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the preoperative resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, the general rules of the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS), and both of them combined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive patients with PDAC (50 men and 36 women; mean age ± SD, 70.8 ± 9.0 years; age range, 49-86 years) underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Following the NCCN guideline, the degree of vascular invasion was evaluated to determine the NCCN score: 0 points for absence of vascular invasion, 1 point for tumor contact ≤ 180°, and 2 points for tumor contact > 180°. Direct invasion to adjacent structures was rated according to the general rules of JPS to determine the JPS score: 0 points for absence and 1 point for presence. The NCCN score, JPS score, and sum of the two scores, which we refer to as the "combined score," were compared with histopathologic or intraoperative findings as well as for the differentiation of R0 resection (negative resection margins) from R1 (microscopic tumor infiltration) and R2 (macroscopic residual tumor) using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for the differentiation of R0 from R1 and R2 were 100.0%, 40.0%, and 0.725, respectively, with the NCCN score; 63.9%, 84.0%, and 0.824 with the JPS score; and 86.9%, 68.0%, and 0.874 with the combined score. The AUC of the combined score was significantly greater than that of the NCCN score (p = 0.0059). CONCLUSION: The assessment of resectability of PDAC based on the combined criteria of the NCCN guideline and general rules of JPS was superior to that based on either criterion alone.

Applicability of current NCCN Guidelines for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resectability: analysis and pitfalls.

PURPOSE: To test the applicability of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN v 3.2017) resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in clinical practice, at a high-volume tertiary referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 102 consecutive patients (53 female; mean age 66.2 years, range 34-90 years) with biopsy proven, non-metastatic PDAC were evaluated by our multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer program between July 2013 and February 2016. Retrospective review of staging pancreatic CT angiography was performed, and radiographic features were categorized as conforming to or non-conforming to existing v 3.2017 definitions. RESULTS: Among 102 patients, 10 (10%) had CTA evidence of vascular involvement that did not conform to existing NCCN Guidelines. Six new scenarios of vascular involvement were identified. The remaining 92 patients presented with resectable (n = 20 [22%]), borderline resectable (n = 42 [45.6%]), or unresectable (n = 30 [33%]) PDAC. Approximately half (n = 21 [51%]) of borderline resectable patients' tumors demonstrated isolated venous involvement, whereas 39% had both arterial and venous involvement. A minority (11%) demonstrated only major arterial involvement. Assignment to unresectable status reflected both arterial and venous involvement (11, 37%), arterial involvement only (10, 33%) patients, and unreconstructible venous involvement in 9 (30%). CONCLUSION: In our experience, current NCCN resectability guidelines for PDAC do not accurately classify vascular involvement identified in approximately 10% of patients. Revision of the current guidelines could be helpful to clinical practice.

Proposed radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability in peritoneal-based malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The selection of patients for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy infusion (HIPEC) is important, and relies heavily on imaging. However, it has been reported that Computer Tomographic (CT) scans may only achieve a low sensitivity of 33% for peritoneal disease. We propose a set of radiological criteria for pre-operative determination of resectability of peritoneal disease in peritoneal-based malignancies and validate this in our cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparotomy with a view for CRS and HIPEC, at the National Cancer Centre Singapore from January 2000 to April 2010, was performed. Intra-operative Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) scores were recorded. The pre-operative imaging was reviewed with a senior radiologist who was blinded, and recorded the radiological PCI scores (CT-PCI) and eight additional CT prognostic factors (CT-PF). The CT-PCI and CT-PF scores were then compared with the intra-operative findings to determine the radiological accuracy. The scores and the individual prognostic factors were then evaluated for their predictive ability for unresectability. RESULTS: Comparison of the CT-PCI and PCI scores showed a concordance correlation coefficient at 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.7). Accuracy was increased with the addition CT-PF. The presence of omental caking and ascites were predictors of unresectability. We propose a scoring system which is able to predict for unresectable disease with a specificity of 80% and a sensitivity of 62%. CONCLUSION: With our proposed criteria, and scoring system, the selection of patients for CRS and HIPEC can be improved, and unnecessary exploratory operations avoided.

Survival effects of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy on pancreatic carcinoma stratified by preoperative resectability status.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1(GS) chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma patients, stratified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) preoperative resectability definition. METHODS: A total of 141 consecutive patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma who received adjuvant GS chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. According to the NCCN preoperative resectability definition, tumors were divided into resectable tumors (R group), borderline resectable tumors with portal vein contact (BR-PV group), and borderline resectable tumors with arterial contact (BR-A group). Overall survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for the 141 patients were 89.6%, 69.9%, and 41.1%, respectively. Overall survival of the R group was significantly better than that of the BR-PV group and the BR-A group (P < 0.05). Overall 5-year survival rates of the R group, the BR-PV group, and the BR-A group were 49.0%, 25.0%, and 11.3%, respectively. Arterial contact (P = 0.020), preoperative CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml (P < 0.001), and positive nodal involvement (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant GS chemotherapy may provide a survival benefit especially for patients with resectable pancreatic carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:405-412. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Value of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Assessment of Resectability in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancy under the Local Anesthesia / 한국간담췌외과학회지

BACKGROUNDS: Despite the advance of radiologic imaging techniques, not a fewer number of patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies are found to be unresectable just at the time of laparotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy for assessing resectability of hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies. METHODS: From May 1999 to March 2000, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 16 patients with suspected hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies after clinical examination, laboratory tests, and radiologic imaging techniques(ultrasonography, computed tomography, ERCP, and PTC). Local anesthesia with intravenous sedation was used. A 10-mm infraumbilical port was used for the telescope and another 5-mm port was used for the working instrument depending upon intra-abdominal findings. During the procedure, we tried to find any evidence of distant metastasis or advanced local invasion such as, peritoneal seeding, metastatic nodule at the liver, major vascular involvement or invasion of adjacent other intraabdominal organ. RESULTS: 4 of 16 patients were found to have unresectable malignancies because of peritoneal seeding, hepatic metastases or ascites by diagnostic laparoscopy. 3 patients had invasion to superior mesenteric vein and adjacent structures overlooked at diagnostic laparoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for assessing resectability were 66.7%, 28.6% and 50.0% for radiologic imaging techniques and 100%, 57.1% and 81.3% for diagnostic laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia proved to be an effective diagnostic tool for assessing resectability of hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies by means of assisting the radiologic imaging technique.