No Benefit of Concomitant 5-Aminosalicylates in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Escalated to Biologic Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVES: 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are frequently continued in patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), even after escalation to biologic agents, without evaluation of the benefit of this approach. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) pooled analysis of trials of infliximab and golimumab in UC, to evaluate whether concomitant use of 5-ASA modifies clinical outcomes among anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-treated patients. METHODS: We included IPD from five trials of infliximab and golimumab in patients with moderate-severe UC (ACT-1 and -2, PURSUIT-SC, PURSUIT-M, NCT00336492). Patients treated with infliximab or golimumab were categorized as receiving concomitant 5-ASA or not at time of trial entry. Primary outcome was clinical remission (Mayo Clinic Score < 3) at last follow-up for each trial; secondary outcomes were clinical response and mucosal healing. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, we evaluated association between concomitant 5-ASA and clinical remission, after adjusting for sex, smoking, baseline disease activity, disease extent, biochemical variables (C-reactive protein, albumin, hemoglobin), and concomitant prednisone and immunomodulators. RESULTS: We included 2183 infliximab-treated or golimumab-treated patients (1715 [78.6%] on 5-ASA). Concomitant use of 5-ASA was not associated with odds of achieving clinical remission (adjusted OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.45-1.01], p = 0.06), clinical response (aOR, 0.89 [0.60-1.33], p = 0.58) or mucosal healing (aOR, 1.12 [0.82-1.51], p = 0.48). These results were consistent in trials of induction and maintenance therapy, and in trials of infliximab and golimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Based on IPD pooled analysis, in patients with moderate-severe UC who are escalated to anti-TNF therapy, continuing 5-ASA does not improve clinical outcomes.

Therapies for crohn's disease: a clinical update / Terapia farmacológica em portadores de doença de Crohn. Atualização clínica

ABSTRACT The main objectives of clinical therapy in Crohn's disease are clinical and endoscopic remission without the use of corticosteroids for long periods of time, prevention of hospitalization and surgery, and improvement of quality of life. The main limitation of drug therapy is the loss of response over the long term, which makes incorporation of new drugs to the therapeutic arsenal necessary. This review analyses the main drugs currently used in clinical treatment of Crohn's disease.

RESUMO Os principais objetivos da terapia clínica na doença de Crohn são a remissão clínica e endoscópica por tempo prolongado, sem o uso de corticosteroides, além de evitar hospitalizações e cirurgias, e melhorar a qualidade de vida. A principal limitação da terapêutica medicamentosa é a perda de reposta a longo prazo, o que faz com que a incorporação de novas drogas ao arsenal terapêutico seja necessária. Esta revisão aborda os principais medicamentos utilizados atualmente no tratamento clínico da doença de Crohn.

THERAPIES FOR CROHN'S DISEASE: a clinical update.

The main objectives of clinical therapy in Crohn's disease are clinical and endoscopic remission without the use of corticosteroids for long periods of time, prevention of hospitalization and surgery, and improvement of quality of life. The main limitation of drug therapy is the loss of response over the long term, which makes incorporation of new drugs to the therapeutic arsenal necessary. This review analyses the main drugs currently used in clinical treatment of Crohn's disease.

Outcome of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis cases treated by individualized regimens at a tertiary level clinic.

AIM: To determine the clinical, radiological and drug resistance profile as well as the factors associated with treatment outcome of Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All newly diagnosed patients with pulmonary MDR-TB from August 2002 to December 2004 enrolled at New Delhi Tuberculosis Centre, were included in the study. They were followed up clinically, radiologically and bacteriologically by sputum smear, culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) at regular intervals. According to their DST pattern and previous history of Anti-Tubercular Treatment (ATT), individualized treatment regimens were tailored for each patient. RESULTS: Out of total 27 bacteriologically proven cases of MDR-TB included in this study, 19 were males (mean age and weight 38.5 years and 52.6 kgs, respectively) and eight females (mean age and weight 34.3 years and 40.7 kgs, respectively). A majority (18) were residents of Delhi and the rest hailed from different parts of North India. All of them had a history of previous treatment ranging from six to 34 months. Cavity on chest X-rays was seen in 81%, while 44% showed extensive involvement. The patients received at least four "second line drugs" during their treatment with a mean of 6.2 anti-tubercular drugs during their intensive phase. Of the 27 patients, 13 were cured, 10 defaulted, one died, one is still on treatment and two were referred for surgery. Radiological improvement was observed in two third of cases and chest X-ray of two patients showed a complete resolution. Six predictors were identified for successful outcome of MDR-TB. They include weight gain at six months, culture conversion, radiological improvement during treatment, disease with M. tuberculosis strains exhibiting resistance to less than or up to three anti-tubercular drugs, use of less than or up to three second line drugs in treatment and no change of regimen during treatment. CONCLUSION: Default from treatment was observed to be a major challenge in the treatment of MDR-TB due to long duration and expense of ATT.

Tolerance of 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and 5-aminosalicylic-induced acute pancreatitis.

Derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease may induce acute pancreatitis of immunoallergic origin. 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) differs from its 5-ASA counterpart by the position of the NH2 group and has shown efficacy in ulcerative colitis. The risk of cross intolerance reaction between 5-ASA and 4-ASA has currently never been evaluated. We report three cases of 5-ASA-induced pancreatitis, with no recurrence of pancreatitis during subsequent treatment with 4-ASA enemas. We conclude that 4-ASA enemas are a safe and well-tolerated therapeutic alternative whenever 5-ASA-induced pancreatitis occurs.

[Short-term effect of treatment protocol utilizing levofloxacin, pasiniazide and M. Vaccae on multi- drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of the protocol combining levofloxacin, pasiniazide, M. Vaccae (V+D+M protocol) in the treatment of multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis (MDR-TB). METHOD: Ninety-seven cases of MDR-TB randomized into V+D+M treatment protocol group (n=50) and control group (n=47) were observed for the negative sputum conversion rate, focal absorption, pulmonary cavity closure and improvement of immune function, after a 6-month treatment course. RESULTS: After the completion of the treatment course, the negative sputum conversion rate in V+D+M treatment protocol group was 84%, significantly higher than that in the control group (42%); the former group showed a focal absorption rate and pulmonary cavity closure rate of 83% and 66%, which were 33% and 26% respectively in the latter. In V+D+M treatment protocol group, T lymphocyte subgroups CD(3) and CD(4) were significantly elevated while CD(8) decreased after treatment, resulting in increased CD(4) to CD(8) ratio. The incidence of adverse effects resulting from the different treatment protocols in the two groups were comparable (30% vs 38%). CONCLUSION: V+D+M treatment protocol is effective for MDR-TB, which possesses the potential for application in clinical practice.

[Comparative randomized open study of the efficacy and tolerance of enemas with 2 gr of 4-amino-salicylic acid (4-ASA) and 1 gr of 5-amino-salicylic acid (5-ASA) in distal forms of hemorrhagic rectocolitis]. / Etude comparative ouverte randomisée de l'efficacité et de la tolérance de lavements de 2 g d'acide 4-amino-salicylique (4-ASA) et de 1 g d'acide 5-amino-salicylique (5-ASA) dans les formes basses de rectocolite hémorragique.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The aim of this multicentre, randomized open trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 4-ASA vs 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of distal moderately active ulcerative colitis. Fifty patients were randomized to receive enemas in 100 mL suspension of 4-ASA (2 g, n = 26), or 5-ASA (1 g, n = 24). The subjects filled a daily questionnaire on enema retention duration, and tolerance. Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Significant clinical and endoscopic improvements occurred in both groups. Efficacy and enema retention time did not differ between groups. Tolerance was significantly better for 4-ASA: score 0.46 +/- 0.77 vs 1.00 +/- 0.73, P = 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of both treatments was equivalent, but 4-ASA enemas were better tolerated than 5-ASA in this open trial.

Double blind, controlled trial of 4-aminosalicylic acid and prednisolone enemas in distal ulcerative colitis.

Corticosteroid or 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas are the treatment of choice for distal ulcerative colitis but up to one third of patients may be unresponsive. As an alternative therapy might be advantageous, the efficacy of six weeks' treatment with 2 g 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) (n = 24) and 20 mg prednisolone enemas (n = 21) were compared in a double blind, randomised trial in patients with acute distal (less than 30 cm from the anus) ulcerative colitis. Baseline demography and clinical severity were similar in both groups. Five of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA and 4 of 21 receiving prednisolone did not complete the trial because of deteriorating symptoms, failure to improve, or side effects. At the time of leaving the trial, 24 hour stool frequency, the presence of blood in the stools, and histological and sigmoidoscopic appearances were similar in both groups. Symptomatic improvement occurred in 17 of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA compared with 11 of 21 receiving prednisolone (chi 2 = 1.62, NS). Complete symptomatic improvement occurred in 9 of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA compared with 5 of 21 receiving prednisolone (chi 2 = 0.98, NS). Histological improvement was seen in 9 of 24 patients on 4-ASA compared with 7 of 21 on prednisolone (chi 2 = 0.08, NS). One patient receiving 4-ASA was considered to have an idiosyncratic reaction to the drug but other side effects were not considered to be drug related. Thus, 4-ASA, previously used in the treatment of tuberculosis (para-aminosalicyclic acid), is as good as prednisolone in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and should be considered in patients unresponsive to steroids or in whom steroid treatment is undesirable.

A prospective randomized double blind trial comparing prednisolone and 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas in acute distal ulcerative colitis.

A prospective double blind and randomized study was conducted to compare 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) and prednisolone-21-phosphate enemas in inducing remission in patients with acute distal ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis distal to the splenic flexure as assessed by flexible colonoscopy, barium enema and histology were included in the study. Of 40 consecutive patients, 20 were randomized to each of the two treatment groups. Clinical evaluation was done weekly; sigmoidoscopy and histology were performed at entry and at the end of 4 weeks. Therapy was discontinued in four patients treated with prednisolone enemas due to worsening of symptoms. The clinical improvement was significant in the remaining patients (P less than 0.001) and was similar in the two groups (P greater than 0.1). Sigmoidoscopic and histological improvement were better with 4-ASA than with prednisolone enemas. No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients treated. The present study suggests that 4-ASA is a safe and effective treatment for inducing remission in acute distal ulcerative colitis.

New salicylate therapies for ulcerative colitis.

Since the development of sulfasalazine about a half century ago, the prognosis for patients with ulcerative colitis has improved significantly. Very recently, the active moiety of oral sulfasalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid, has been made available as a topical (enema) preparation. In this article, Dr. Bruckstein reviews the advantages of the enemas in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and briefly examines the potential benefits of the new oral salicylate preparations.

Topical salicylate therapy (4-ASA and 5-ASA enemas).

Topical therapy with amino salicylate enemas is the treatment of choice for proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, and left-sided ulcerative colitis. Adjunctive sulfasalazine therapy is often required. Relapse rates of 80 per cent can be expected within 3 months of discontinuing therapy.

Experience with topical administration of 4-aminosalicylic acid in ulcerative colitis.

4-Aminosalicylic acid was applied topically in a daily dose of 1.4 gm for two weeks in ten patients with ulcerative colitis. After favorable results, the therapeutic effects of 4-aminosalicylic acid and salazopyrin enemas were compared in a two-week cross-over open trial, in 20 patients suffering from recurrent ulcerative colitis involving the rectum and rectosigmoid. No significant difference was found in the changes of the endoscopic picture of the mucosa. The results did not show a significant difference between 4-aminosalicylic acid and salazopyrin enemas, either in the clinical activity or in the histologic picture. 4-Aminosalicylic acid seems to be a suitable drug for improving the clinical symptoms of ulcerative proctitis.

Treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis with 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Twenty-five patients with active left-sided ulcerative colitis were randomly assigned to receive either 2 g of 4-aminosalicylic acid (para-aminosalicylic acid) or placebo in a 60-mL volume as a nightly retention enema. The duration of treatment was 8 weeks. Disease activity was assessed by grading clinical symptoms of blood, mucus, urgency, sigmoidoscopic findings, and degree of histologic inflammation in rectal biopsies. At 8 weeks, 10 of 12 patients (83%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55% to 97%) who received 4-aminosalicylic acid showed improvement in clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic variables. In contrast, only 2 of 13 patients (15%, 95% CI, 4% to 38%) who had received placebo showed clinical improvement (P less than 0.005). The 11 patients in the placebo group who showed no improvement were treated subsequently with open-label 4-aminosalicylic acid enemas. Of the 11, 9 showed clinical, sigmoidoscopic, and histologic improvement. No adverse effects were seen. 4-Aminosalicylic acid enemas are a safe and effective means of treating left-sided ulcerative colitis.

4-Aminosalicylic acid retention enemas in treatment of distal colitis.

Forty-five of 47 patients with distal ulcerative colitis completed a two-week double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to determine if 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) enemas, 1 g bid or 2 g bid, were therapeutically effective compared to placebo. Forty-one patients enrolled because they were refractory to or had side effects during conventional therapy with sulfasalazine or corticosteroids. Proctoscopic examination was done before and after two weeks of treatment. Patients kept daily diaries assessing: blood in stools, mucus in stools, tenesmus, abdominal pain, loss of appetite, fatigue, weight loss, and malaise. Severity of each symptom ranged from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe). A total severity score was calculated from the above for each patient. At the end of the two-week study, 35 patients elected to take 4-ASA in an open-label trial for one year. 4-ASA enemas in the 1-g bid but not the 2-g bid dosage were significantly more effective in improving symptoms than placebo: P less than or equal to 0.05. Neither dose of 4-ASA enema was better than placebo in improving the sigmoidoscopic appearance at the end of two-weeks. Forty-six percent of patients had complete resolution of all signs and symptoms in the open-label trial and 31% were better but still had sigmoidoscopic evidence of disease, a total response rate of 77%. Side effects were similar in the placebo and 4-ASA groups. We conclude that 4-ASA enemas in a dose of 1 g bid are safe and effective in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.