Efficacy, effectiveness and side effects of medications used to prevent fractures.

There is an increasing number of effective therapies for fracture prevention in adults at risk of osteoporosis. However, shortcomings in the evidence underpinning our management of osteoporosis still exist. Evidence of antifracture efficacy in the groups of patients who most commonly use calcium and vitamin D supplements is lacking, the safety of calcium supplements is in doubt, and the safety and efficacy of high doses of vitamin D give cause for concern. Alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate and denosumab have been shown to prevent spine, nonspine and hip fractures; in addition, teriparatide and strontium ranelate prevent both spine and nonspine fractures, and raloxifene and ibandronate prevent spine fractures. However, most trials provide little information regarding long-term efficacy or safety. A particular concern at present is the possibility that oral bisphosphonates might cause atypical femoral fractures. Observational data suggest that the incidence of this type of fracture increases steeply with duration of bisphosphonate use, resulting in concern that the benefit-risk balance may become negative in the long term, particularly in patients in whom the osteoporotic fracture risk is not high. Therefore, reappraisal of ongoing use of bisphosphonates after about 5 years is endorsed by expert consensus, and 'drug holidays' should be considered at this time. Further studies are needed to guide clinical practice in this area.

Role of Triticum aestivum aqueous extract in glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis in rats.

Administration of aqueous extract of T. aestivum (200 and 400 mg/kg/day, po, for 30 days) and risedronate (20 microg/kg, sc, five times a week for 30 days) following methyl prednisolone sodium succinate (10 mg/kg, sc, thrice a week for 4 weeks) induced osteoporosis in Wistar rats showed an increase in the serum levels of bone mineral content markers, decrease in the serum and urinary levels of bone resorption markers. An incline in strength of femur and tibia was seen particularly with 400 mg/kg of T. aestivum. Maintenance of calcium homeostasis, formation of collagen and scavenging of free radicals can plausibly be the mode of action of aqueous extract of T. aestivum thereby combating osteoporosis induced by glucocorticoids.

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, trial of risedronate for the prevention of bone mineral density loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy.

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been used as an adjuvant treatment to radiation therapy (RT) for the management of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Long-term ADT decreases bone mineral density (BMD) and increases the risk of osteoporosis. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of risedronate for the prevention of BMD loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients undergoing RT plus 2 to 3 years of ADT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted for nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients receiving RT plus 2 to 3 years of ADT. All had T scores > -2.5 on dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline. Patients were randomized 1:1 between risedronate and placebo for 2 years. The primary endpoints were the percent changes in the BMD of the lumbar spine at 1 and 2 years from baseline, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Analyses of the changes in BMD and bone turnover biomarkers were carried out by comparing mean values of the intrapatient changes between the 2 arms, using standard t tests. RESULTS: One hundred four patients were accrued between 2004 and 2007, with 52 in each arm. Mean age was 66.8 and 67.5 years for the placebo and risedronate, respectively. At 1 and 2 years, mean (±SE) BMD of the lumbar spine decreased by 5.77% ± 4.66% and 13.55% ± 6.33%, respectively, in the placebo, compared with 0.12% ± 1.29% at 1 year (P=.2485) and 0.85% ± 1.56% (P=.0583) at 2 years in the risedronate. The placebo had a significant increase in serum bone turnover biomarkers compared with the risedronate. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly oral risedronate prevented BMD loss at 2 years and resulted in significant suppression of bone turnover biomarkers for 24 months for patients receiving RT plus 2 to 3 years of ADT.

Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic porogens for engineering of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles containing risedronate sodium.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two mechanistically different porogens, namely: the hydrophilic hydroxy-propyl-ß-cyclodextrin and the hydrophobic porogens (mineral oil and corn oil) in producing open/closed pored engineered polylactide-co-glycolic-acid microspheres suitable for pulmonary delivery of risedronate sodium (RS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surface morphology of the microspheres was studied and they were characterized for entrapment efficiency (%EE), particle size, and porosity as well as aerodynamic and flow properties. Selected formulae were investigated for in vitro drug release and deposition behavior using next generation impactor. Furthermore, the safety of the free drug and the selected prepared systems was assessed by MTT viability test performed on Calu-3 cell line. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The current work revealed that HP-ß-CD produced open-pored microspheres, while oils produced closed pored microspheres. Modulation of preparation parameters generated porous RS microspheres with high %EE, sustained drug release profile up to 15 days, suitable geometric and aerodynamic particle sizes and excellent flow properties. The safety of HP-ß-CD systems was higher than the systems utilizing oil as porogen. CONCLUSION: Porogen type affected the behavior of the microspheres as demonstrated by the various characterization experiments, with microspheres prepared using HP-ß-CD being superior to those prepared using oils as porogens.

Management of anastrozole-induced bone loss in breast cancer patients with oral risedronate: results from the ARBI prospective clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this multicenter, phase III, prospective open label clinical trial was to investigate the effect of risedronate (R) on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal, early breast cancer (BC) patients scheduled to receive anastrozole (A). METHODS: Pre-treatment BMD of 213 patients with hormone receptor-positive BC was evaluated at lumbar spine (LS) and hip (HP). Patients were categorized according to their baseline BMD T-score as being at low, moderate and high risk of osteoporosis. Low risk patients received anastrozole only (A), moderate risk were randomized to anastrozole +/- risedronate (A+/-R) administration and high risk patients received anastrozole + risedronate (A+R). Anastrozole was given at a dosage of 1 mg/day while oral risedronate was given at 35 mg/week. BMD was then assessed at 12 and 24 months. All patients received daily supplements of calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 IU/day). RESULTS: At 24 months, in the moderate risk group, treatment with A+R resulted in a significant increase in BMD at LS and HP compared to treatment with A only (5.7% v -1.5%, Wilcoxon test P = 0.006, and 1.6% v -3.9% Wilcoxon test P = 0.037, respectively), while no significant difference was found at 12 months; 24.3% of the patients moved to normal BMD region. In the high risk group, a significant increase for LS was detected both at 12 and 24 months (6.3% and 6.6%, P < 0.001) but not for HP; BMD in 14% of patients improved to the osteopenic region. In the low risk group, a significant decrease of BMD was detected at 12 months for LS and HP (-5.3% P < 0.001 and -2.4% P < 0.001, respectively,); at 24 months, a significant decrease of BMD was detected only for LS (-2.5%, P < 0.001). However, 22% of patients became osteopenic and only 4% became osteoporotic. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of oral risedronate in post-menopausal breast cancer patients receiving anastrozole has a favorable effect on BMD. Patients with pre-treatment osteopenic to osteoporotic status should be treated with a combination of both therapies in order to avoid bone loss induced by aromatase inhibition. Patients with normal BMD before starting treatment with anastrozole have a very low risk to develop osteoporosis.

Prevalence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with oral bisphosphonate exposure.

PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a serious complication associated with bisphosphonate therapy, but its epidemiology in the setting of oral bisphosphonate therapy is poorly understood. The present study examined the prevalence of ONJ in patients receiving chronic oral bisphosphonate therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We mailed a survey to 13,946 members who had received chronic oral bisphosphonate therapy as of 2006 within a large integrated health care delivery system in Northern California. Respondents who reported ONJ, exposed bone or gingival sores, moderate periodontal disease, persistent symptoms, or complications after dental procedures were invited for examination or to have their dental records reviewed. ONJ was defined as exposed bone (of >8 weeks' duration) in the maxillofacial region in the absence of previous radiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 8,572 survey respondents (71 +/- 9 years, 93% women), 2,159 (25%) reported pertinent dental symptoms. Of these 2,159 patients, 1,005 were examined and an additional 536 provided dental records. Nine ONJ cases were identified, representing a prevalence of 0.10% (95% confidence interval 0.05% to 0.20%) among the survey respondents. Of the 9 cases, 5 had occurred spontaneously (3 in palatal tori) and 4 occurred in previous extraction sites. An additional 3 patients had mandibular osteomyelitis (2 after extraction and 1 with implant failure) but without exposed bone. Finally, 7 other patients had bone exposure that did not fulfill the criteria for ONJ. CONCLUSIONS: ONJ occurred in 1 of 952 survey respondents with oral bisphosphonate exposure (minimum prevalence of 1 in 1,537 of the entire mailed cohort). A similar number had select features concerning for ONJ that did not meet the criteria. The results of the present study provide important data on the spectrum of jaw complications among patients with oral bisphosphonate exposure.

Notable difference between the development of vertebral fracture and osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients treated with high-dose glucocorticoids for systemic rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Vertebral fracture (VF) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFH) are serious concerns in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with high-dose glucocorticoids (GCs). We comparatively examined the risk factors of VF and OFH in patients who had recently received high-dose GC therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rheumatic diseases receiving GCs (> or =0.5 mg/kg/day for prednisolone equivalent) within the past 2 months were enrolled in this study, and treated with 200 mg/day of etidronate cyclically. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2-4) was examined by QDR2000. OFH was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00679978]. RESULTS: Forty-four patients completed the 2-year study including annual X-rays and the BMD analysis. MRI evaluation at entry and 2 years was performed in 41 patients. The BMD values with anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views decreased by 6.4% and 9.7%, respectively, in the first year, but were stable in the second year. Eleven patients developed VF and 9 patients developed OFH. The risk factors for VF included previous VF and a low BMD value (T score<-1.5) of AP view at baseline with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.9 (95%CI 2.9-76.4), while the risk factor for OFH was a recent maximum GC dosage (>1.2 mg/kg/day versus< or =; OR=7.7, 95%CI 1.3-45.5) and a decrease in BMD value of lateral view (>15% versus< or =; OR=6.7, 95% CI 1.2-36.1) in the first year. CONCLUSION: The development of VF relies on the predisposing factors, while that of OFH depends on the response to high-dose GC therapy.

Value of a new fixed-combination pack of bisphosphonate, calcium and vitamin D in the therapy of osteoporosis: results of two quantitative patient research studies.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic patients with insufficient calcium intake and/or vitamin D insufficiency need adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation with their bisphosphonate treatment. However, consistent intake and, therefore, the effectiveness of calcium/vitamin D supplementation may be impaired by several factors in the individual patient: low prescription rate or lack of advice to purchase calcium/vitamin D; reduced compliance because of the complexity of the regimen; or incorrect intake. There is a need to provide patients with a better way of taking bisphosphonate treatment with their calcium/vitamin D supplementation. To this end, a fixed-combination pack to help patients take the combination of bisphosphonate, calcium and vitamin D correctly and regularly has been developed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' understanding of administration instructions, preferences and their perceptions of compliance, convenience and completeness of a fixed-combination pack of bisphosphonate, calcium and vitamin D compared with those associated with separate packs. METHODS: The new monthly fixed-combination pack of bisphosphonate, calcium and vitamin D contains four weekly boxes. Each box contains a blister pack with one swallowable risedronate 35 mg film-coated tablet and six sachets of calcium/vitamin D effervescent granules (calcium 1000 mg and vitamin D(3) [colecalciferol] 880 IU) for dissolution in water as an oral solution, together constituting 1 week of therapy, accompanied by a patient information leaflet. Two quantitative patient research survey studies were conducted using standard questionnaires in face-to-face interviews with 400 postmenopausal women in several French cities. Participants were given the combined pack and two separate packs (risedronate 35 mg once weekly and calcium/vitamin D effervescent granules in sachets). In the first study, participants' understanding of administration instructions and preferences were evaluated. In the second study, participants' perception of compliance, convenience and completeness of the new combination pack of risedronate 35 mg plus calcium/vitamin D compared with two separate packs were evaluated. RESULTS: Participants asked about the combined pack answered a significantly higher proportion of questions about intake instructions correctly (80.3%) than participants asked about the two separate packs (70.7%) [p = 0.0004]. The combined pack was preferred by 72% of participants (p < 0.0001) for several reasons. Compared with separate packs, the combined pack was considered easier to use by 63% and easier to remember to use by 67% of participants. Participants believed that use of the combined pack would be more likely to help them take their bisphosphonate regularly (66%) and correctly (67%), and to take their calcium/vitamin D supplementation more regularly and correctly (68%), than use of separate packs. Seventy percent of participants believed that use of the combination pack would help them to not forget to take calcium/vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSION: Use of the fixed-combination pack of risedronate 35 mg plus calcium/vitamin D once weekly could increase the likelihood that postmenopausal osteoporotic patients will receive a complete bisphosphonate, calcium and vitamin D therapy course and is likely to enhance correct intake of combination therapy. Use of this fixed-combination product will provide patients with a tool for improving adherence to recommended osteoporosis therapy and optimize the effectiveness of such treatment.

Prior treatment with vitamin K(2) significantly improves the efficacy of risedronate.

UNLABELLED: Prior 8-week treatment with menatetrenone, MK-4, followed by 8-week risedronate prevented the shortcomings of individual drugs and significantly increased the strength of ovariectomized ICR mouse femur compared to the ovariectomized (OVX) controls. Neither MK-4 following risedronate nor the concomitant administration may be recommended because they brought the least beneficial effect. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the best combinatory administration of risedronate at 0.25 mg/kg/day (R) with vitamin K(2) at approximately 100 microg MK-4/kg/day (K) to improve strength of osteoporotic mouse bone. METHODS: Thirteen-week-old ICR mice, ovariectomized at 9-week, were treated for 8 weeks with R, K, or R plus K (R/K), and then, either the treatment was withdrawn (WO) or switched to K or R in the case of R and K. After another 8 weeks, the mice were killed, and mechanical tests and analyses of femur properties by peripheral quantitative computed tomography, microfocus X-ray tube computed tomography, and confocal laser Raman microspectroscopy were carried out. RESULTS: The K to R femur turned out superior in parameters tested such as material properties, bone mineral density, BMC, trabecular structure, and geometry of the cortex. The increased cross-sectional moment of inertia, which occurred after K withdrawal, was prevented by risedronate in K to R. In addition to K to R, some properties of R to WO diaphysis and K to WO epiphysis were significantly better than OVX controls. CONCLUSION: Prior treatment with MK-4 followed by risedronate significantly increased femur strength in comparison to the OVX controls.

Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of risedronate for the prevention of bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Risedronate prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether risedronate prevents bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer were treated with oral calcium 600 mg and vitamin D 400 U daily and randomly assigned to receive oral risedronate 35 mg weekly or placebo, with all these therapies beginning within a month of the start of chemotherapy. Most chemotherapy regimens included anthracyclines, taxanes, or cyclophosphamide. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline and 1 year. The primary end point was the change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from baseline to 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 216 women enrolled; 170 women provided BMD data at 1 year. There was no difference in the mean change or percent change in LS BMD between groups, with a loss of 4.3% in the risedronate arm and 5.4% for placebo at 1 year (P = .18). Loss of BMD at the femoral neck and total hip were also similar between treatment groups. Risedronate was well tolerated, with no significant differences in adverse events compared with placebo, except that arthralgias and chest pain were worse in those receiving the placebos. CONCLUSION: Risedronate did not prevent bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Changes in non-enzymatic glycation and its association with altered mechanical properties following 1-year treatment with risedronate or alendronate.

SUMMARY: One year of high-dose bisphosphonate (BPs) therapy in dogs allowed the increased accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and reduced postyield work-to-fracture of the cortical bone matrix. The increased accumulation of AGEs in these tissues may help explain altered bone matrix quality due to the administration of BPs in animal models INTRODUCTION: Non-enzymatic glycation (NEG) is a posttranslational modification of the organic matrix that results in the formation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). In bone, the accumulation of AGEs play an important role in determining fracture resistance, and elevated levels of AGEs have been shown to adversely affect the bone's propensity to brittle fracture. It was thus hypothesized that the suppression of tissue turnover in cortical bone due to the administration of bisphosphonates would cause increased accumulation of AGEs and result in a more brittle bone matrix. METHODS: Using a canine animal model (n = 12), we administered daily doses of a saline vehicle (VEH), alendronate (ALN 0.20, 1.00 mg/kg) or risedronate (RIS 0.10, 0.50 mg/kg). After a 1-year treatment, the mechanical properties, intracortical bone turnover, and the degree of nonenzymatic cross-linking of the organic matrix were measured from the tibial cortical bone tissue of these animals. RESULTS: There was a significant accumulation of AGEs at high treatment doses (+49 to + 86%; p < 0.001), but not at doses equivalent to those used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, compared to vehicle. Likewise, postyield work-to-fracture of the tissue was significantly reduced at these high doses (-28% to -51%; p < 0.001) compared to VEH. AGE accumulation inversely correlated with postyield work-to-fracture (r (2) = 0.45; p < 0.001), suggesting that increased AGEs may contribute to a more brittle bone matrix. CONCLUSION: High doses of bisphosphonates result in the accumulation of AGEs and a reduction in energy absorption of cortical bone. The increased accumulation of AGEs in these tissues may help explain altered bone matrix quality due to the administration of BPs in animal models.

Evaluation of symptomatic slow-acting drugs in osteoarthritis using the GRADE system.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic slow-acting drugs (SYSADOA) have been largely studied over the last decade. The objective of this study is to prepare a document providing recommendations for the use of SYSADOA in osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: The following interventions were taken into consideration: avocado/soybean unsaponifiables, chondroitin sulfate, diacereine, glucosamine sulfate, hyaluronic acid, oral calcitonin, risedronate, strontium ranelate. Recommendations were based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The GRADE system is based on a sequential assessment of the quality of evidence, followed by assessment of the balance between benefits versus downsides and subsequent judgment about the strength of recommendations. RESULTS: Chondroitin sulfate, diacereine, glucosamine sulfate, avocado/soybean unsaponifiables and hyaluronic acid have demonstrated pain reduction and physical function improvement with very low toxicity, with moderate to high quality evidence. Even if pre-clinical data and some preliminary in vivo studies have suggested that oral calcitonin and strontium ranelate could be of potential interest in OA, additional well-designed studies are needed. CONCLUSION: In the benefit/risk ratio, the use of chondroitin sulfate, diacereine, glucosamine sulfate, avocado/soybean unsaponifiables and hyaluronic acid could be of potential interest for the symptomatic management of OA.

Effects of risedronate on alveolar bone loss and angiogenesis: a stereologic study in rats.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of risedronate, one of the most potent bisphosphonates, on alveolar bone resorption and angiogenesis in rats with experimental periodontitis to identify dose-response curves and treatment durations that can be therapeutic for periodontal therapy versus those associated with osteonecrosis of the jaws. METHODS: Thirty-five rats, 25 with experimental periodontitis (groups 1 through 5) and 10 with healthy periodontium (groups 6 and 7), were divided into seven equal groups: group 1 received no treatment; groups 2 and 3 received risedronate, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, respectively, for 3 weeks; groups 4 and 5 received risedronate, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, respectively, for 8 weeks; and groups 6 and 7 received 0.9% NaCl for 3 and 8 weeks, respectively. Animals in groups 2 through 7 were administered treatment 5 days per week. After histologic processing, histomorphometric and stereologic analyses were carried out to estimate the number of blood vessels (NBV) and the volumetric densities of bone (Vb), marrow (Vm), osteoblasts (Vob), and osteoclasts (Voc). RESULTS: A total of 0.1 and 1 mg/kg risedronate for 3 weeks (groups 2 and 3) significantly increased Vb and Vob and decreased Vm more prominently in group 2 (P <0.001), whereas 1 mg/kg risedronate for 8 weeks (group 5) induced no significant improvement in these parameters compared to group 1 (P >0.05). No significant decrease in Voc was found in drug-administered groups compared to group 1 (P >0.05). A significant decrease in NBV (P <0.01) and positive correlation between NBV and Vb (r(2) = 0.941; P = 0.006) were found only in group 5. CONCLUSION: A short duration of risedronate administration may be useful in inhibiting bone resorption in periodontitis, whereas excessive dosages of the drug administered in longer durations can lead to impairment of bone formation and angiogenesis.

Recovery of trabecular and cortical bone turnover after discontinuation of risedronate and alendronate therapy in ovariectomized rats.

Alendronate (ALN) and risedronate (RIS) are bisphosphonates effective in reducing bone loss and fractures associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, it is uncertain how long it takes bone turnover to be re-established after treatment withdrawal, and whether this differs between the two drugs. The objective of this study was to determine the time required to re-establish normal bone turnover after the discontinuation of ALN and RIS treatment in an animal model of estrogen-deficiency osteoporosis. Two hundred ten, 6-mo-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized and 6 wk later were randomized into baseline controls (n = 10) and four treatment groups (n = 50/group): vehicle-treated controls (CON; 0.3 ml sterile water), ALN (2.4 microg/kg), low-dose RIS (RIS low; 1.2 microg/kg), and high-dose RIS (RIS high; 2.4 microg/kg). Treatments were administered 3 times/wk by subcutaneous injection. Baseline controls were killed at the initiation of treatment. Other groups were treated for 8 wk, and subgroups (n = 10/ treatment group) were killed 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 wk after treatment was withdrawn. Static and dynamic histological analyses were performed for cortical (tibial diaphysis) and trabecular (proximal tibia and L(4) vertebrae) bone. DXA and mechanical testing was performed on the L(5) vertebra. After 8 wk of treatment, trabecular bone turnover rates were significantly suppressed in all drug-treated animals. Trabecular bone formation rate (BFR/BS) remained significantly lower than vehicle in bisphosphonate-treated animals through 12 wk. Sixteen weeks after treatment withdrawal, trabecular BFR/BS in the proximal tibia was re-established in animals treated with RIS but not in animals treated with ALN compared with controls. BMD of the fifth lumbar vertebra remained significantly higher than controls 16 wk after treatment withdrawal in ALN-treated animals but not in RIS-treated animals. Despite reductions in BMD and increases in bone turnover, ultimate force of the fifth lumbar vertebra remained significantly higher in all drug-treated animals through 16 wk after withdrawal.

[Concurrent treatment of osteoporosis including vitamin K].

The 2006 version of the guideline for prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis recommends vitamin K(VK)supplementation in the state of its deficiency. As VK(2) gained grade B in all aspects in the guideline, single use of the drug is limited. VK(2) may be used concurrently with other drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis. In this paper, the results of our concurrent use of two of vitamin D(3), VK(2), and EHDP are summarized, and the combined therapy including VK(2) will be reviewed.

High-dose bisphosphonate therapy in an urgent case of spontaneous multiple vertebral fractures in a 55 year old woman.

An early postmenopausal Caucasian woman aged 55 sustained multiple vertebral fractures after a minor trauma. After exclusion of any kind of secondary osteoporosis, we administered due to clinical severity combined oral and cyclic intravenous bisphosphonate therapy (oral risedronate 35 mg/week, i.v. pamidronate 30 mg quarterly) with adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation for 28 months. We performed a transiliac bone biopsy at baseline and at month 28. The paired samples were investigated by histomorphometry, by microCT-analysis for 3d structure and by qBEI representing bone mineral density distribution. Mineralisation of the bone matrix was not influenced by supplementation of calcium and vitamin D. Parameters of bone architecture and BMD improved; and a reduction of pain and increased mobility was observed. No further osteoporotic fractures occurred during the time of investigation.

Comparative studies on effect of risedronate and alfacalcidol against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritic patients.

Osteoporosis is a common adverse reaction induced by glucocorticoid treatment. Bisphosphonate, vitamin D(3) (VD(3)) or vitamin K(2) (VK(2)) is recommended as first or second choice of drug for treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. In the present study, the treatment effect of risedronate against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritic patients was compared with that of alfacalcidol. Twelve patients were randomized to receive either risedronate (2.5 mg) or alfacalcidol (0.5 microg) daily for 48 weeks. Each patient also received 800 mg of calcium supplementation (800 mg/day) daily. Bone mineral density (BMD) and the biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured before (baseline) and 12, 24, and 48 weeks after treatment with risedronate or alfacalcidol, and the percentage changes in these parameters from baseline were compared. The BMD values 12, 24 and 48 weeks after treatment with risedronate increased by 3.9%, 4.1% and 5.2%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those after treatment with alfacalcidol (2.8%, 2.1% and 2.5%, respectively). Urinary excretion of N-telopeptides of type I collagen and deoxypyridinoline after risedronate treatment were more significantly decreased than that after alfacalcidol treatment. The present findings at least suggest that risedronate is more useful for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than alfacalcidol, although the number of patients studied was small.

Bone material properties in trabecular bone from human iliac crest biopsies after 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate.

UNLABELLED: Long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio in triple iliac crest biopsies of osteoporotic women were evaluated. In this double-blinded study, 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate arrested the tissue aging encountered in untreated osteoporosis and in osteoporosis treated with other antiresorptives. This effect may be contributing to risedronate's antifracture efficacy. INTRODUCTION: Risedronate is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. It reduces bone turnover, increases BMD, and decreases fracture risk. To date, there are no data available on the long-term effects of risedronate on bone material properties in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteoporotic women enrolled in the VERT-NA trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 5 years. All subjects received calcium. They also received vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Triple iliac crest biopsies were collected from a subset of these subjects at baseline, 3 years, and 5 years. Mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio was measured in these biopsies using Fourier transform infrared imaging. RESULTS: Patients that received placebo exhibited increased mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio after 3 and 5 years compared with baseline values. On the contrary, patients that received risedronate retained baseline values in both bone material indices throughout. A more spatially detailed analysis revealed that this was achieved mainly through beneficial effects on active bone-forming areas. Surprisingly, patients that received risedronate achieved premenopausal values at bone-forming areas in both indices after 5 years of treatment. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with risedronate affects bone material properties (mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio) and arrests the tissue aging apparent in untreated osteoporosis. These changes at the material level of the bone matrix may contribute to risedronate's rapid and sustained antifracture efficacy in osteoporotic patients.

Importance of calcium co-medication in bisphosphonate therapy of osteoporosis: an approach to improving correct intake and drug adherence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In all of the large, pivotal, multicentre trials of bisphosphonate therapy, patients have received added calcium in amounts ranging from 500 to 1000 mg/day above individual dietary intake. Accordingly, calcium supplements or calcium/vitamin D combinations are currently recommended as co-medication with anti-resorptive therapy in all recently published guidelines on the treatment of osteoporosis. However, the consistent use or effectiveness of calcium may be impaired by several factors in the individual patient, including low prescription rate or lack of advice to purchase calcium, reduced adherence because of the complexity of the regimen, and incorrect intake (e.g. taking calcium with bisphosphonates at the same time). Patients with osteoporosis who adhere to drug therapy experience a significantly lower fracture rate. Therefore, there is a need to improve correct intake of bisphosphonates together with calcium supplementation, which may enhance adherence. The dosage regimen could be simplified by providing the two compounds in an integrated pack. Such a pack, containing one tablet of risedronic acid and six calcium carbonate tablets (Actonel), Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Weiterstadt, Germany), has been developed to facilitate correct intake. In this study, the impact of this fixed-combination pack on patient understanding of dosing instructions and on preference was tested by comparing the fixed combination with separate risedronic acid and calcium packages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A new blister strip was developed containing one tablet of risedronic acid 35mg and six tablets of calcium carbonate 1250mg (500mg elemental calcium), representing 1 week of therapy; the control was the same medications in separate packaging. The study was conducted in a cohort of 164 postmenopausal women (mean age 69 years). Half of the participants were bisphosphonate users (n = 83). The combined understanding of five instructions - risedronic acid intake in the morning, only with water, without food, without other medication, and separate from calcium - was tested in a crossover design. Participants were also asked to state their preference for the combination packaging versus separate packs. RESULTS: Understanding of the five instructions for the separate packaging was 70%. The combination pack significantly improved understanding of these instructions to 80% (p < 0.05). Eighty-three percent of participants preferred the combination pack over separate packs (p < 0.05). The most frequently given reasons for preferring the combination pack were prefer one pack over two packs, easy/convenient to use/practical/handy, easy to understand/less confusion, and easier to remember/less likely to forget. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a fixed-combination pack of risedronic acid 35 mg/week and calcium tablets can increase the likelihood that postmenopausal osteoporotic patients will receive both a bisphosphonate and calcium, which in turn is likely to enhance the correct intake of combination therapy.

Effects of 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution in triple biopsies of the iliac crest in postmenopausal women.

UNLABELLED: Long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution in triple transiliac crest biopsies of osteoporotic women were evaluated. In this double-blinded study, 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate increased the degree and homogeneity of mineralization without producing hypermineralization. These changes at the material level of bone could contribute to risedronate's antifracture efficacy. INTRODUCTION: Risedronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. It reduces bone turnover, increases BMD, and decreases fracture risk. To date, there are no data available on the long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteoporotic women enrolled in the VERT-NA trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 5 years. All subjects received calcium and vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Triple iliac crest biopsies were collected from a subset of these subjects at baseline and 3 and 5 years. BMDD was measured in these biopsies using quantitative backscattered electron imaging, and the data were also compared with a normal reference group. RESULTS: At baseline, both risedronate and placebo groups had a lower degree and a greater heterogeneity of mineralization as well as an increase in low mineralized bone compared with the normal reference group. The degree of mineralization increased significantly in the risedronate as well as in the placebo group after 3- and 5-year treatment compared with baseline. However, the degree of mineralization did not exceed that of normal. Three-year treatment with risedronate significantly increased the homogeneity of mineralization and slightly decreased low mineralized bone compared with placebo. Surprisingly with 5-year risedronate treatment, heterogeneity of mineralization increased compared with 3-year treatment, which might indicate an increase in newly formed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with risedronate affects the homogeneity and degree of mineralization without inducing hypermineralization of the bone matrix. These changes at the material level of the bone matrix may contribute to risedronate's antifracture efficacy in osteoporotic patients.