Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 164
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 92(1): 75-77, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29884565

RESUMEN

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a combination intravenous antibiotic with potentially important activity against drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. Ceftolozane/tazobactam's in vitro activity was evaluated in 30 samples collected from 23 adult cystic fibrosis patients with extended and pan-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 2015. Testing results demonstrated that 30% of the isolates were susceptible,13% were intermediate, and 57% were resistant. This suggests that ceftolozane/tazobactam may be a useful antibiotic in carefully selected, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas isolates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Esputo/microbiología , Tazobactam
2.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 36(1): 127-130, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735843

RESUMEN

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel antimicrobial agent with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other common Gram-negative pathogens. In this study, we determined the antimicrobial susceptibility for a total of 149 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa for the most commonly used antimicrobials including the new agent ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). Broth microdilution was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration against various antimicrobials including C/T. Among the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor, overall susceptibility was 67%, 55% and 51% for C/T, Piperacillin/Tazobactam (P/T) and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, respectively. The variations in the susceptibility rates were noted among the three different ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors. Interestingly, 33% susceptibility was noted for C/T against isolates that were resistant to P/T, indicating the higher activity of C/T. This finding suggests about 33% of the P/T-resistant isolates can still be treated effectively with C/T. C/T could be a better alternative for the treatment of ESBL-producing organism, and thereby usage of higher antimicrobials can be minimised.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefoperazona/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Sulbactam/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , India , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Tazobactam , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 92(1): 69-74, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29789189

RESUMEN

A total of 18,656 Enterobacteriaceae and 4,175 Pseudomonas aeruginosa were consecutively collected from 85 US hospitals and tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods in a central monitoring laboratory (JMI Laboratories). The antimicrobial susceptibility and frequency of key resistance phenotypes were assessed and stratified by infection type as follows: bloodstream (BSI; 3,434 isolates; 15.0%), pneumonia (6,439; 28.2%), skin and skin structure (SSSI; 4,134; 18.1%), intra-abdominal (IAI; 951; 4.2%), and urinary tract (UTI; 7,873; 34.5%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 99.9% to 100.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 97.0% (pneumonia) to 99.4% (UTI) of P. aeruginosa isolates. Susceptibility rates were consistently lower for ß-lactams, such as ceftazidime (82.3% vs. 87.1-90.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (87.5% vs. 90.2-95.6%), and meropenem (96.8% vs. 98.4-99.4%) among Enterobacteriaceae from pneumonia compared to other infection types. Susceptibility to gentamicin was also generally lower among isolates from pneumonia, whereas susceptibility to levofloxacin and colistin were lowest among BSI and SSSI isolates, respectively. The occurrence of multidrug-resistance (MDR; 8.2% overall), extensively drug-resistance (XDR; 1.1% overall), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE; 1.3% overall) phenotypes were markedly higher among isolates from patients with pneumonia compared to other infection types. Among P. aeruginosa, susceptibility rates for ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and gentamicin were lowest among isolates from pneumonia, whereas susceptibility to meropenem was similar among isolates from BSI, pneumonia, and IAI (77.3-77.9%), and susceptibility to levofloxacin was markedly lower among UTI isolates (67.1%). The frequencies of P. aeruginosa isolates with MDR and XDR phenotypes were highest among isolates from patients with pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos
4.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 36(1): 32-36, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735823

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The emergence of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens in the hospital and community has increased the concern to the health-care providers due to the limited treatment options. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in frequently isolated bacterial pathogens causing severe infections is of great importance. The data generated will be useful for the clinicians to decide empiric therapy on the local epidemiological resistance profile of the antimicrobial agents. This study aims to monitor the distribution of bacterial pathogen and their susceptibility pattern to the commonly used antimicrobial agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes Gram-negative bacilli collected from intra-abdominal, urinary tract and respiratory tract infections during 2014-2016. Isolates were collected from seven hospitals across India. All the study isolates were characterised up to species level, and minimum inhibitory concentration was determined for a wide range of antimicrobials included in the study panel. The test results were interpreted as per standard Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 2731 isolates of gram-negative bacteria were tested during study period. The most frequently isolated pathogens were 44% of Escherichia coli (n = 1205) followed by 25% of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 676) and 11% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 308). Among the antimicrobials tested, carbapenems were the most active, followed by amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam. The rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates were ranged from 66%-77% in E. coli to 61%-72% in K. pneumoniae, respectively. Overall, colistin retains its activity in > 90% of the isolates tested and appear promising. CONCLUSION: Increasing rates of ESBL producers have been noted, which is alarming. Further, carbapenem resistance was also gradually increasing, which needs much attention. Overall, this study data show that carbapenems, amikacin and colistin continue to be the best agents available to treat drug-resistant infections. Thus continuous monitoring of susceptibility profile of the clinically important Gram-negative pathogens is of great importance to guide effective antimicrobial therapy.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , India , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/aislamiento & purificación
5.
Infection ; 46(4): 461-468, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29594953

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) for treating extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA) infections, and to analyze whether high C/T dosing (2 g ceftolozane and 1 g tazobactam every 8 h) and infection source control have an impact on outcome. METHODS: Retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated with C/T for XDR-PA infection at a tertiary referral hospital (November 2015-July 2017). Main clinical and microbiological variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included. Median age was 59.5 years and Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3.5. Fourteen (36.8%) patients had respiratory tract infection, six (15.8%) soft tissue, and six (15.8%) urinary tract infection. Twenty-three (60.5%) received high-dose C/T and in 24 (63.2%) C/T was combined with other antibiotics. At completion of treatment, 33 (86.8%) patients showed clinical response. At 90 days of follow-up, 26 (68.4%) achieved clinical cure, and 12 (31.6%) had clinical failure because of persistent infection in one patient, death attributable to the XDR-PA infection in four, and clinical recurrence in seven. All-cause mortality was 5 (13.2%). Lower C/T MIC and adequate infection source control were the only variables significantly associated with clinical cure. CONCLUSIONS: C/T should be considered for treating XDR-PA infections, with infection source control being an important factor to avoid failure and resistance.


Asunto(s)
Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/farmacología , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/clasificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tazobactam , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20182018 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305368

RESUMEN

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 51 000 healthcare-associated infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa occur annually in the USA, more than 6000 of which (13%) are caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) strains. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (TOL/TAZ) (Zerbaxa) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. At this time, clinical data on the role of TOL/TAZ treatment outside of FDA-approved indications is limited. Herein, we present a case of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa osteomyelitis of the upper extremity, which was successfully treated with TOL/TAZ for 8 weeks with optimal clinical and laboratory responses. Monotherapy with TOL/TAZ appears effective for treatment of complicated bone and joint infections with XDR P. aeruginosa in combination with comprehensive surgical management, particularly when few antibiotic options exist.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Tazobactam
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 56, 2018 01 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29373965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify clinical risk factors for antimicrobial resistances and multidrug resistance (MDR) in urinary tract infections (UTI) in an emergency department in order to improve empirical therapy. METHODS: UTI cases from an emergency department (ED) during January 2013 and June 2015 were analyzed. Differences between patients with and without resistances towards Ciprofloxacin, Piperacillin with Tazobactam (Pip/taz), Gentamicin, Cefuroxime, Cefpodoxime and Ceftazidime were analyzed with Fisher's exact tests. Results were used to identify risk factors with logistic regression modelling. Susceptibility rates were analyzed in relation to risk factors. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven of four hundred sixty-nine patients who met the criteria of UTI had a positive urine culture. An MDR pathogen was found in 36.5% of these. Overall susceptibility was less than 85% for standard antimicrobial agents. Logistic regression identified residence in nursing homes, male gender, hospitalization within the last 30 days, renal transplantation, antibiotic treatment within the last 30 days, indwelling urinary catheter and recurrent UTI as risk factors for MDR or any of these resistances. For patients with no risk factors Ciprofloxacin had 90%, Pip/taz 88%, Gentamicin 95%, Cefuroxime 98%, Cefpodoxime 98% and Ceftazidime 100% susceptibility. For patients with 1 risk factor Ciprofloxacin had 80%, Pip/taz 80%, Gentamicin 88%, Cefuroxime 78%, Cefpodoxime 78% and Ceftazidime 83% susceptibility. For 2 or more risk factors Ciprofloxacin drops its susceptibility to 52%, Cefuroxime to 54% and Cefpodoxime to 61%. Pip/taz, Gentamicin and Ceftazidime remain at 75% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several risk factors for resistances and MDR in UTI. Susceptibility towards antimicrobials depends on these risk factors. With no risk factor cephalosporins seem to be the best choice for empiric therapy, but in patients with risk factors the beta-lactam penicillin Piperacillin with Tazobactam is an equal or better choice compared to fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins or gentamicin. This study highlights the importance of monitoring local resistance rates and its risk factors in order to improve empiric therapy in a local environment.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Tazobactam , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
8.
Infect Disord Drug Targets ; 18(1): 81-85, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27411471

RESUMEN

Multi drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Extended- Spectrum-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae are becoming an increasing difficult clinical problem. Immediate resistance to some of the new antimicrobials such as ceftolozane/tazobactam is unusual and is due to a variety of mechanisms such as hyper-production of inactivating enzymes and gene mutation. In addition, previous antimicrobial administration is a well-recognized risk factor to develop resistance. We present a patient with a liver abscess where the organism was resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam resulting in a poor clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamasas/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Absceso Hepático/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Hepático/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Penicilánico/efectos adversos , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Tazobactam , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , beta-Lactamasas/genética
9.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(1): 47-51, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28668676

RESUMEN

Elizabethkingia meningoseptica is a non-fermentative Gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an important pathogen in nosocomial infections and is usually associated with high mortality. E. meningoseptica is inherently resistant to many broad-spectrum antibiotics, and appropriate antibiotic selection is crucial for survival. Data about the therapeutic efficacy of fluoroquinolone in E. meningoseptica bacteraemia are limited. We retrospectively enrolled patients with E. meningoseptica bacteraemia who were treated with a single antimicrobial agent with in vitro activity against E. meningoseptica for at least 48 hours in a Taiwanese medical centre between January 2011 and June 2016. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of fluoroquinolone and non-fluoroquinolone treatment. A logistic regression and a propensity score-adjusted model were used to evaluate the risk factors for 14-day mortality. A total of 66 patients were identified, 24 who received fluoroquinolone treatment (ciprofloxacin, n = 9; levofloxacin, n = 15) and 42 who received non-fluoroquinolone treatment (piperacillin/tazobactam, n = 26; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, n = 15; minocycline, n = 1). The fluoroquinolone group had significantly lower 14-day mortality than the non-fluoroquinolone group (8.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.023). The APACHE II score was significantly higher in the non-fluoroquinolone group than in the fluoroquinolone group. In a propensity-adjusted analysis, fluoroquinolone use was an independent factor associated with 14-day survival. After stratification using the APACHE II score, treatment with fluoroquinolone was associated with 14-day survival, but did not reach statistical significance in both groups with greater and lesser severity. Therefore, fluoroquinolone is a suitable antimicrobial agent for treating E. meningoseptica bacteraemia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Chryseobacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Flavobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Chryseobacterium/clasificación , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Flavobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Flavobacteriaceae/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán
10.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(2): 227-234, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705666

RESUMEN

To evaluate the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, 497 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa and 802 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates were consecutively collected during the period from September 2014 to April 2015 from patients in Germany with bloodstream, lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal or urinary tract infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution. Results were interpreted according to EUCAST criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with MIC50/90 values of 0.25/0.5 mg/L and 0.25/1 mg/L, respectively. Comparatively, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and meropenem MIC50/90 values were 2/8 mg/L, 0.25/8 mg/L and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for E. coli, and 2/16 mg/L, 0.12/8 mg/L, and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for K. pneumoniae isolates. The activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against P. aeruginosa was superior to that of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials. Based on MIC50/90 values, ceftolozane/tazobactam (0.5/2 mg/L) was more active than piperacillin/tazobactam (8/64 mg/L), ceftazidime (2/16 mg/L), cefepime (2/16 mg/L) or meropenem (0.5/8 mg/L). In conclusion, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited the best in vitro potency of the antibiotics tested against P. aeruginosa, including isolates that were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, doripenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and tobramycin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has the potential to become a useful addition to the limited armamentarium of drugs that can be used to treat this problem pathogen.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Alemania , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Tazobactam , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
11.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(1): 71-76, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are several empiric antibiotic treatment options for febrile neutropenia, yet there is no universally-accepted initial protocol. We aimed to assess the performance of a protocol (piperacillin, gentamicin and cefazolin) introduced over 40 years ago and compare its coverage against bacteria isolated from blood of neutropenic patients with that of various commonly used antibiotic treatment protocols. METHODS: Adults with neutropenia admitted between 2003 and 2012 to the hemato-oncologic departments and in whom blood cultures were taken on admission were included. Appropriateness of several common antibiotic protocols was assessed based on the susceptibility of the blood isolates. Crude mortality rates were computed by the susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients' blood to the actual treatment given. RESULTS: In total, 180 admissions of neutropenic patients (95 in patients who had fever above 38 °C) with positive blood cultures were analyzed. The actual antibiotic regimen prescribed was deemed appropriate in 82% of bacteremia episodes. The recommended institutional protocol was used in 62% of bacteremia episodes in neutropenic patients. This protocol would have been appropriate in 85% of all neutropenic bacteremia episodes and 89% of episodes in febrile neutropenia patients compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (79%, P = 0.13 and 76%, P = 0.002, respectively) and imipenem (93%, P = 0.004 and 92%, P = 0.74, respectively). Isolation of bacteria resistant to the actual antibiotic treatment given was associated with higher mortality at one week and at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Common current antibiotic regimens provide similar coverage among febrile neutropenic patients, whereas broad spectrum antibiotic combinations maximize coverage among neutropenic patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Cultivo de Sangre , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus/aislamiento & purificación
12.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(2): 305-311, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29177611

RESUMEN

The efficacy of empirical non-carbapenem antibiotics for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (ESBL-B) is still inconclusive. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of empirical non-carbapenem antibiotics for treating ESBL-B. Electronic medical records of individuals who were diagnosed with ESBL-B were reviewed between January 2010 and December 2014 at four university hospitals in Korea. Patients were classified into non-carbapenem and carbapenem groups according to the empirical antibiotic regimen. Patients treated with appropriate empirical antibiotics and who subsequently received carbapenems as definitive therapy were included in the analysis. The inverse probability of treatment weights, a statistical method that adjusts baseline statistics by giving weights based on propensity score, was used. During the study period, 232 adequately treated patients with ESBL-B were included in the analysis: 49 patients in the non-carbapenem group and 183 in the carbapenem group. The baseline characteristics and severity of infection were similar after propensity score weighting. The 30-day mortality rates for the two groups were not statistically significantly different (non-carbapenems 6.3% and carbapenems 11.4%; P = 0.42). In a multivariate analysis, empirical treatment with non-carbapenem antibiotics was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.06, P = 0.14). In a subgroup analysis, empirical treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam was also not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.37-4.00, P = 0.75). Appropriate non-carbapenems were not inferior to carbapenems as initial empirical therapy for ESBL-B.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Meropenem , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(1): 126-133, 2018 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early ß-lactamase inhibitors were combined with established penicillins, but different combinations may be more appropriate to counter current ß-lactamase threats, with development facilitated by the US Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act. Cefepime/tazobactam is especially attractive, combining an AmpC-stable cephalosporin with a clinically established inhibitor, active against ESBLs and suitable for high-dose administration. METHODS: Organisms (n = 563) were clinical isolates submitted to the UK national reference laboratory. MICs were determined by CLSI agar dilution with tazobactam at 4 mg/L and, for a subset, at 8 mg/L. RESULTS: Cefepime/tazobactam 8 + 4 mg/L achieved coverage of 96%-100% of Enterobacteriaceae with penicillinases, AmpC, ESBL, K1 or OXA-48 ß-lactamases. Even at 1 + 4 mg/L, the combination inhibited >94% of isolates with penicillinases, AmpC enzymes or ESBLs. Most Enterobacteriaceae with KPC and NDM carbapenemase were resistant at current cefepime breakpoints but 80% of those with VIM types were susceptible at 8 + 4 mg/L. Tazobactam did little to potentiate cefepime against non-fermenter groups, though gains were seen against AmpC-producing Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Increasing the tazobactam concentration to 8 mg/L gave further small increases in activity against Enterobacteriaceae groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose cefepime/tazobactam, justifying an 8 + 4 or 8 + 8 mg/L breakpoint, can achieve a carbapenem-like spectrum, with some additional coverage of OXA-48 (and maybe VIM) Enterobacteriaceae. Clinical evaluation is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Cefepima , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Tazobactam , beta-Lactamasas/genética
14.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(1): 175-183, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063446

RESUMEN

Health care of severe burn patients is highly specialized and may require international patient transfer. Burn patients have an increased risk of developing infections. Patients that have been hospitalized in countries where carbapenemase-producing microorganisms (CPMO) are endemic may develop infections that are difficult to treat. In addition, there is a risk on outbreaks with CPMOs in burn centers. This study underlines that burn patients may extensively be colonized with CPMOs, and it provides best practice recommendations regarding clinical microbiology and infection control. We evaluated CPMO-carriage and wound colonization in a burn patient initially treated in Romania, and transported to the Netherlands. The sequence types and acquired beta-lactamase genes of highly-resistant microorganisms were derived from next generation sequencing data. Next, we searched literature for reports on CPMOs in burn patients. Five different carbapenemase-producing isolates were cultured: two unrelated OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumanii, OXA-48-producing Enterobacter cloacae, and NDM-1-producing Providencia stuartii. Also, multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were detected. Among the sampling sites, there was high variety in CPMOs. We found 46 reports on CPMOs in burn patients. We listed the epidemiology of CPMOs by country of initial treatment, and summarized recommendations for care of these patients based on these reports and our study.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Quemaduras/microbiología , Enterobacter cloacae/aislamiento & purificación , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Providencia/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Desastres , Enterobacter cloacae/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Kanamicina/uso terapéutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Países Bajos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Providencia/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Rumanía , Sulfadiazina de Plata/uso terapéutico
15.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(4): 594-600, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277531

RESUMEN

Dosing recommendations for continuous infusion of piperacillin, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic, are mainly guided by outputs from population pharmacokinetic models constructed with intermittent infusion data. However, the probability of target attainment in patients receiving piperacillin by continuous infusion may be overestimated when drug clearance estimates from population pharmacokinetic models based on intermittent infusion data are used, especially when higher doses (e.g. 16 g/24 h or more) are simulated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin when infused continuously in critically ill patients. For this analysis, 270 plasma samples from 110 critically ill patients receiving piperacillin were available for population pharmacokinetic model building. A one-compartment model with linear clearance best described the concentration-time data. The mean ± standard deviation parameter estimates were 8.38 ± 9.91 L/h for drug clearance and 25.54 ± 3.65 L for volume of distribution. Creatinine clearance improved the model fit and was supported for inclusion as a covariate. In critically ill patients with renal clearance higher than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, a high-dose continuous infusion of 24 g/24 h is insufficient to achieve adequate exposure (pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of 100% fT>4 x MIC) against susceptible Pseudomonas aerginosa isolates (MIC ≤16 mg/L). These findings suggest that merely increasing the dose of piperacillin, even with continuous infusion, may not always result in adequate piperacillin exposure. This should be confirmed by evaluating piperacillin target attainment rates in critically ill patients exhibiting high renal clearance.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Creatinina/sangre , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/sangre , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Sepsis/microbiología , Tazobactam
16.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(2): 181-189, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28993143

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with healthcare-associated infections. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established ß-lactamase inhibitor. A total of 1963 Gram-negative organisms (489 P. aeruginosa and 1474 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected using a prevalence-based approach from 14 medical centres in the APAC region. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method as described by the CLSI and the results were interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam [MIC50/90, 0.25/4 µg/mL; 89.2/85.8% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] and meropenem [MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 µg/mL; 96.3/96.5% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other ß-lactam agents ranging from 85.8/81.0% for piperacillin/tazobactam to 74.4/72.7% for cefepime and 72.8/68.1% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 3.6% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 25.6% exhibited an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/90, 0.5/16 µg/mL), but not against isolates with a CRE phenotype (MIC50/90, >32/>32 µg/mL). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 µg/mL) ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 90.8% at an MIC of ≤4 µg/mL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited high rates of susceptibility to amikacin [91.2/89.4% (CLSI/EUCAST)] and colistin [98.4/100.0% (CLSI/EUCAST)]. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than available cephalosporins when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Asia Sudoriental , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Humanos , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Tazobactam , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico
17.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 16(1): 71, 2017 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29132352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over recent decades, a dramatic increase in infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens has been observed worldwide. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between local resistance bacterial patterns and antibiotic consumption in an intensive care unit in a Romanian university hospital. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2013. Data covering the consumption of antibacterial drugs and the incidence density for the main resistance phenotypes was collected on a monthly basis, and this data was aggregated quarterly. The relationship between the antibiotic consumption and resistance was investigated using cross-correlation, and four regression models were constructed, using the SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL) and the R version 3.2.3 packages. RESULTS: During the period studied, the incidence of combined-resistant and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains increased significantly [(gradient = 0.78, R2 = 0.707, p = 0.009) (gradient = 0.74, R2 = 0.666, p = 0.013) respectively], mirroring the increase in consumption of ß-lactam antibiotics with ß-lactamase inhibitors (piperacillin/tazobactam) and carbapenems (meropenem) [(gradient = 10.91, R2 = 0.698, p = 0.010) and (gradient = 14.63, R2 = 0.753, p = 0.005) respectively]. The highest cross-correlation coefficients for zero time lags were found between combined-resistant vs. penicillins consumption and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains vs. carbapenems consumption (0.876 and 0.928, respectively). The best model describing the relation between combined-resistant P. aeruginosa strains and penicillins consumption during a given quarter incorporates both the consumption and the incidence of combined-resistant strains in the hospital department during the previous quarter (multiple R2 = 0.953, p = 0.017). The best model for explaining the carbapenem resistance of P. aeruginosa strains based on meropenem consumption during a given quarter proved to be the adjusted model which takes into consideration both previous consumption and incidence density of strains during the previous quarter (Multiple R2 = 0.921, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-correlation coefficients and the fitted regression models provide additional evidence that resistance during the a given quarter depends not only on the consumption of antibacterial chemotherapeutic drugs in both that quarter and the previous one, but also on the incidence of resistant strains circulating during the previous quarter.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Cuidados Críticos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/patogenicidad , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Fenotipo , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Rumanía , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947473

RESUMEN

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a cephalosporin-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination that exhibits potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including strains that are resistant to other ß-lactams. The emergence of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa has rarely been described. Here we characterized ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant P. aeruginosa strains recovered from a patient who was treated with this agent for 6 weeks for a recurrent wound infection. The results showed that the resistance was mediated by a single AmpC structural mutation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéutico , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Tazobactam , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de Heridas/microbiología
19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28923865

RESUMEN

Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa include empirical regimens incorporating two antibiotics from different classes with activity against P. aeruginosa for select at-risk patients to increase the likelihood that the organism will be susceptible to at least one agent. The activity against P. aeruginosa and the rates of cross-resistance of ceftolozane-tazobactam were compared to those of the ß-lactam comparators cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem alone and cumulatively with ciprofloxacin or tobramycin. Nonurine P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from adult inpatients at 44 geographically diverse U.S. hospitals. MICs were determined using reference broth microdilution methods. Of the 1,257 isolates collected, 29% were from patients in intensive care units and 39% were from respiratory sites. The overall rate of susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam was high at 97%, whereas it was 72 to 76% for cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. The rate of nonsusceptibility to all four comparator ß-lactams was 11%; of the isolates nonsusceptible to the four comparator ß-lactams, 80% remained susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Among the isolates nonsusceptible to the tested ß-lactam comparators, less than half were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. By comparison, approximately 80% of the ß-lactam-nonsusceptible isolates were susceptible to tobramycin, for overall cumulative susceptibility rates of 94 to 95%, nearly 10% higher than that of the ciprofloxacin-ß-lactam combinations and approaching that of ceftolozane-tazobactam as a single agent. The rates of susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam were consistently high, with little observable cross-resistance. Ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy performed at or above the level of commonly utilized combination therapies on the basis of in vitro susceptibilities. Ceftolozane-tazobactam should be considered for use in patients at high risk for resistant P. aeruginosa infection and as an alternative to empirical combination therapy, especially for patients unable to tolerate aminoglycosides.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cefalosporinas/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Cefepima , Ceftazidima/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/microbiología , Neutropenia Febril/patología , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ácido Penicilánico/farmacología , Piperacilina/farmacología , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/microbiología , Neumonía/patología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/patología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidad , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Sepsis/patología , Tazobactam , Tienamicinas/farmacología , Tobramicina/farmacología
20.
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis ; 24(4): 219-227, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28778361

RESUMEN

Appropriate antibiotic dosing is critical to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis. The addition of continuous renal replacement therapy makes achieving appropriate antibiotic dosing more difficult. The lack of continuous renal replacement therapy standardization results in treatment variability between patients and may influence whether appropriate antibiotic exposure is achieved. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate impacts attaining appropriate antibiotic concentrations when conventional continuous renal replacement therapy antibiotic doses were used. This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the effect of effluent flow rate variance on pharmacodynamic target attainment for cefepime, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam. Published demographic and pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. Monte Carlo simulations of 5000 patients were evaluated for each antibiotic dosing regimen at the extremes of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommended effluent flow rates (20 and 35 mL/kg/h). The probability of target attainment was calculated using antibiotic-specific pharmacodynamic targets assessed over the first 72 hours of therapy. Most conventional published antibiotic dosing recommendations, except for levofloxacin, reach acceptable probability of target attainment rates when effluent rates of 20 or 35 mL/kg/h are used.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/sangre , Cefepima , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/sangre , Ceftazidima/farmacocinética , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Cefalosporinas/sangre , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Simulación por Computador , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Levofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Levofloxacino/sangre , Levofloxacino/farmacocinética , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Método de Montecarlo , Ácido Penicilánico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilánico/sangre , Ácido Penicilánico/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/administración & dosificación , Piperacilina/sangre , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Tazobactam , Tienamicinas/administración & dosificación , Tienamicinas/sangre , Tienamicinas/farmacocinética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA