The efficacy of novel metabolic targeted agents and natural plant drugs for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease treatment: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent chronic liver disease characterized by excess accumulation of fat in hepatocytes. Because no drug has been approved for NAFLD treatment, this work analyzed the effects of agents resulting from 2 research hotspots, metabolic target agents, and natural plant drugs, on NAFLD with network meta-analysis. METHODS: Public databases were searched through August 14, 2020. Randomized controlled trials that compared obeticholic acid, elafibranor, cenicriviroc, selonsertib, curcumin, silymarin, and resveratrol to placebo were included. Liver pathology improvement, hepatic biochemical indicators, and lipid metabolism indicators were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Obeticholic acid was found to significantly increase the frequency of liver biopsy improvement compared to placebo (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.60, 2.77). The ranking results among the hepatic biochemical indicators showed that obeticholic acid (94.9%) and elafibranor (86.3%) have a relative advantage in reducing alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and obeticholic acid also had an advantage (95.4%) in reducing aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. Considering lipid metabolic indicators, elafibranor (expSMD: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.05; SUCRA: 100%), and obeticholic acid (expSMD: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28,0.84; SUCRA: 75.6%) significantly reduced triglyceride (TG) levels compared with placebo; moreover, obeticholic acid, but not elafibranor, caused a serious increase in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Novel metabolic targeted agents generally have better effects than natural plant drugs, especially obeticholic acid, and elafibranor. However, obeticholic acid showed serious adverse effects such as increasing LDL-C levels and decreasing HDL-C levels. Curcumin showed potential advantages for NAFLD but lacked statistical significance.

Weak acids induce PGE2 production in human oesophageal cells: novel mechanisms underlying GERD symptoms.

The role of weak acids with pH values in the range of 4-7 has been implicated in the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is associated with heartburn symptom in GERD patients; however, the precise productive mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we revealed that exposure to weak acids increases PGE2 production with a peak at pH 4-5, slightly in human normal oesophageal cells (Het-1A), and robustly in oesophageal squamous carcinoma cells (KYSE-270). Release of PGE2 from the oesophageal mucosa was augmented by weak acid treatment in rat. Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), a bile acid, upregulated cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in Het-1A and KYSE-270 and induced PGE2 production in KYSE-270 cells. Weak acid-induced PGE2 production was significantly inhibited by cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), ERK, and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4 (TRPV4), a pH-sensing ion channel, inhibitors. Hangeshashinto, a potent inhibitor of COX-2, strongly decreased weak acid- and CDCA-induced PGE2 levels in KYSE-270. These results indicated that weak acids induce PGE2 production via TRPV4/ERK/cPLA2 in oesophageal epithelial cells, suggesting a role in GERD symptoms like heartburn. Interventions targeting pH values up to 5 may be necessary for the treatment of GERD.

[Menthol in the adjuvant treatment of gallbladder stones fragmented by ESWL as an option for reducing doses of urso- and chenodeoxycholic acid]. / Mentholsubstitution als Option zur Dosisreduktion von Urso- und Chenodeoxycholsäure in der adjuvanten Therapie nach ESWL von Gallenblasensteinen.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of the litholytic activity of terpenes in the conservative treatment of gallstone disease vary. Achievement of a stone-free state through dissolution of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a suitable model for investigating the litholytic activity of menthol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After ESWL in patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, the litholytic efficacy of the standard therapy of 125 mg urso-/chenodeoxycholic acid (UDC/CDC) per 25 kg body weight (UDC + CDC) was compared with that of 62.5 mg UDC/CDC plus 125 mg menthol (M) per 25 kg body weight (M + UDC + CDC). 70 patients were treated with M + UDC + CDC (n = 36) or UDC + CDC (n = 34) in a double-blind design. RESULTS: 19 of 34 patients (55.9%) in the UDC + CDC group became stonefree in an average period of 5.9 months, compared with 17 out of 36 patients (47.2%) in the M + UDC + CDC group in 8.8 months. Although the patients on UDC + CDC became stone-free significantly more quickly (p = max [p1,p2] = 0.4717), there was no relevant statistical difference in the total number of stone-free patients between the two treatment groups. After subtraction of the patients who terminated the study prematurely, significantly larger numbers of stone-free patients under the standard therapy were found at 9 and 12 months (16 : 9 and 19 : 12, respectively), while at the other time points no significant difference was found. Before ESWL, seven of 25 patients in the menthol group had two or more stones, while in the group treated with the standard therapy this was only the case in two patients. Five patients had mild calcification on admission to the study, four of whom received M + UDC + CDC. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients become stone-free more quickly on the standard UDC + CDC therapy. However, after subtraction of the patients who discontinued the study prematurely it can be seen that this results from significantly higher numbers of stone-free patients at 9 and 12 months, so that over the entire observation period-and in consideration of the less favorable stone parameters in the menthol group-there is no substantial statistically relevant difference in the efficacy of the two treatments.

Oral bile acid treatment of biliary cholesterol stones.

Cholesterol gallbladder stones can be dissolved with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) or ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Response rate is 60-90%, dissolution rate 60% in stones not exceeding 1.5 cm in diameter. Mean treatment time amounts to 18 months. To improve oral litholysis: 1) UDCA was combined with the amino acid taurine, 2) CDCA and UDCA were administered in a single bedtime dose, 3) they were combined, each bile acid in half dosage, and 4) they were mixed with terpenes. Although there was some improvement with the combination therapy, final outcome is still suboptimal. Many investigations have been performed concerning gallbladder function, mucus production and nucleating factors, showing both that cholesterol supersaturation of bile is the conditio sine qua non for gallstone formation and that other factors play an additional, important role for the development of the first nidus. These factors have to be considered when therapy shall be improved. As yet oral litholysis has shown neither drug-related side effects nor lethality. It is not more expensive than surgery. Direct contact litholysis with methyl tert-butyl ether could reduce the indication for oral treatment to floating stones or patients who refuse gallbladder puncture. But although oral litholysis does not provide us with optimal results and needs further improvements, it will always keep its place in gallstone therapy.

Efficacy and safety of a combination of chenodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid for gallstone dissolution: a comparison with ursodeoxycholic acid alone.

Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDC) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDC) have distinct physicochemical and metabolic properties which, being complementary, should favor more rapid removal of cholesterol from gallstones when both bile acids are administered together. To see if the combination is more effective and well tolerated, we have compared 5 mg/kg of CDC plus 5 mg/kg of UDC with a 10-mg/kg dose of UDC alone in 120 patients with radiolucent, sonographically confirmed gallstones and characteristics favoring complete dissolution. Ursodeoxycholic acid was chosen as the reference because it dissolves stones faster and is better tolerated than CDC. To minimize the influence of stone size, the major determinant of dissolution, patients were divided, on admission, into two groups according to the maximum stone diameter: 50 had stones less than or equal to 5 mm, 70 had stones greater than 5 mm but less than 15 mm. The effects of treatment on stone dissolution evaluated by cholecystography and ultrasonography at 6, 12, and 24 mo, were analyzed by the actuarial life-table method. In the group with smaller stones, significantly more patients had obtained complete dissolution after treatment with the combination (52%) than after treatment with UDC alone (24%) at 6 mo. After longer periods, results were still better with the combination, although the differences from UDC alone became smaller. In the patients with larger stones, rates of complete and partial dissolutions were higher after treatment with the combination (51% vs. 24% with UDC) at 6 mo and again the differences had become smaller after longer treatment. Although not statistically significant, stone calcification occurred more often with UDC (7 cases) than with the combination (1 case). We conclude that CDC plus UDC is preferable to UDC alone because it dissolves stones more quickly, with a lower incidence of stone calcification, and may result in reduced cost of treatment.

The effects of chenodiol on biliary lipids and their association with gallstone dissolution in the National Cooperative Gallstone Study (NCGS).

The National Cooperative Gallstone Study was a double-masked trial conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of chenodeoxycholic acid (chenodiol) for dissolution of cholesterol gallstones. Patients with radiolucent gallstones were randomly allocated to either a high dose (750 mg/d, n = 305) or low dose (375 mg/d, n = 306) of chenodiol or placebo (n = 305) administered for 2 yr. Specimens of gallbladder bile were obtained for biliary lipid analysis on 50% of all white obtained for biliary lipid analysis on 50% of all white patients at base line and after 3-mo therapy, on 45% at 12 mo, and on 36% at 24 mo. Among these specimens, 20% were inadequate for analysis. For analysis of data, available values during therapy were averaged up to time of dissolution, study exit, or study termination. In the high-dose group, percent chenodiol (molar percent of all bile acids) increased markedly and remained high during the 2 yr of follow-up. Also, molar percent cholesterol decreased significantly and remained low during the 2 yr of follow-up. In the low-dose group, percent chenodiol increased and remained significantly increased. Percent cholesterol saturation decreased at 3 mo, but at 24 mo it was not different from that in the placebo group, suggesting a physiological adaptation to the low dose by 2 yr. 79% of patients on high dose had greater than 70% chenodiol. Among these, half showed unsaturated bile (less than 100% cholesterol saturation) while the remainder were supersaturated; in the former group with unsaturated bile, 23% had complete dissolution and 51% had partial (greater than 50% reduction in stone size) or complete dissolution. In contrast, those with over 70% chenodiol and supersaturated bile had only 5% complete dissolution. Thus, development of unsaturated bile was a major factor associated with gallstone dissolution. The data also indicate that values for percent cholesterol saturation were a better predictor of gallstone dissolution than molar percent chenodiol, although a high percent chenodiol usually was required to obtain unsaturation.

Current status of medical treatment of gallstones.

Medical dissolution of gallstones is feasible and has worked in clinical practice. Cholelithiasis is both common and a cause of significant morbidity nationally. Thus, to readdress the question posed in the introduction, should there be a more aggressive detection of populations at risk to consider prophylactic or early treatment of gallstones, one has to consider the following. Is it cost effective to treat people with asymptomatic stones when one half of gallstones detected at autopsy have not caused trouble in life? Will the reduction of one health hazard create other hazards, such as colonic cancer? Is it improving the quality of the patient's life after successful treatment to have the person return every year for ultrasound or radiologic check-ups for recurrence of gallstones? We feel that despite the low morbidity and mortality of elective surgery, medical dissolution of gallstones is a viable alternative, but, as with most medical decisions, the pros and cons of any therapy for cholelithiasis will ultimately be a decision based on the physician, the patient, and the situation. On the basis of what has been discussed in this review, the approach to treatment should involve a rational understanding of all alternatives.

Medical treatment of gallstones.

The last 10 years have witnessed an enormous amount of work on the medical dissolution of gallstones. Many compounds have been tested and one, chenodeoxycholic acid, is already available for clinical use in the UK. Others will certainly follow. Much remains to be learned of the mechanisms of action of these drugs and the safety of prolonged administration. Effective methods of preventing gallstone recurrence need to be devised. The practice of cholecystectomy is not yet threatened by medical dissolution of gallstones, but in selected patients medical treatment is now a viable alternative. A start has been made.

Failure of cholestyramine to prevent bile salt injury to mouse gastric mucosa.

Bile salts have been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastritis and gastric ulcer. Because the bile salt binding agent cholestyramine has been suggested as a possible therapy for gastric ulcer, we studied the effects of cholestyramine, in the form of Questran, on bile salt-induced injury to mouse gastric mucosa. Solutions of taurocholate or of glycochenodeoxycholate, with or without added Questran, were instilled into the stomachs of fasted mice at pH 1, 3, 5, and 7. Taurocholate damaged the mucosa only at pH 1, whereas glycochenodeoxycholate caused injury at pH 1 and 3. Questran failed to prevent mucosal damage by either bile salt. The ineffectiveness of cholestyramine to prevent injury may be due to the nonionized fraction of bile salts at pH's below their pKa's which will not be sequestered by the anion exchange resin. This phenomenon may help explain the insignificant effect of Qestran treatment in promoting healing of gastric ulcers in a previous clinical trial.