Process optimization, characterization and pharmacokinetic evaluation in rats of ursodeoxycholic acid-phospholipid complex.

The purpose of this research was to study whether the bioavailability of ursodeoxycholic acid could be improved by administering ursodeoxycholic acid-phospholipid complex (UDCA-PLC) orally to rats. A central composite design approach was used for process optimization in order to obtain the acceptable UDCA-PLC. The physicochemical properties of the complex obtained by optimal parameters were investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability studies were conducted in rats of UDCA after oral administration of UDCA-PLC and UDCA tablet. Multiple linear regression analysis for process optimization revealed that the acceptable UDCA-PLC was obtained wherein the optimal values of X(1), X(2) and X(3) were 3, 60 degrees C and 3 h, respectively. The XRD studies of UDCA-PLC obtained by the optimal parameters demonstrated that UDCA and phospholipids in the UDCA-PLC were combined by non-covalent bonds, not form new compounds. But pharmacokinetic parameters of the complex in rats were T(max) 1.6 h, C(max) 0.1346 microg/ml, AUC(0-infinity) 11.437 microg x h/ml, respectively. The relative bioavailability of UDCA of UDCA-PLC was increased by 241%,compared with the reference ursodeoxycholic acid tablet.

The UDCA dosage deficit: a fate shared with CDCA.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used both as the treatment of choice in many cholestatic syndromes and as complementary therapy in many liver diseases. However, few dose-finding studies exist, and none has evaluated the efficacy and long-term safety of UDCA therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). There is an open debate about UDCA's impact on the natural history of PBC, and no universal evidence of benefits on the major endpoint exists. This is perhaps due to a UDCA dosage deficit. Most clinical trials on PBC therapy have used conservative dosages of UDCA similar to those of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) used for dissolution of gallstones. It may be necessary to re-evaluate the dosage of UDCA that provides the most effective treatment.

Low in vivo toxicity of a novel cisplatin-ursodeoxycholic derivative (Bamet-UD2) with enhanced cytostatic activity versus liver tumors.

Cisplatin-bile acid derivatives belonging to the Bamet-family maintain both liver organotropism and cytostatic activity. "In vivo" toxicity and usefulness as chemotherapeutic agent versus liver tumors of a novel drug, Bamet-UD2 [cis-diamminechlorocholylglycinate platinum (II)], with enhanced "in vitro" cytostatic activity was investigated. Using orthotopically implanted mouse Hepa 1-6 hepatoma in the liver of Nude mice, the antitumor effect of Bamet-UD2 was compared with that of a previously characterized compound of this family, Bamet-R2 [cis-diamminebis-ursodeoxycholate platinum(II)], and cisplatin. Life span was significantly prolonged in mice treated with both Bamets (Bamet-UD2 > Bamet-R2), compared with animals receiving saline or cisplatin. All these drugs inhibit tumor growth (Bamet-UD2 = cisplatin > Bamet-R2). However, toxicity-related deaths only occurred under cisplatin treatment. Using rats maintained in metabolic cages, organ-specific toxicity and drug accumulation in tissues were investigated. The amount of both Bamets in the liver was severalfold higher than that of cisplatin. By contrast, a significantly higher amount of cisplatin in kidney and nerve was found. In lung, heart, muscle, brain, and bone marrow the amount of drug was small and also significantly lower in animals receiving Bamets. Signs of neurotoxicity (altered nerve conduction velocity), nephrotoxicity (increased serum urea and creatinine concentrations and decreased creatinine clearance), and bone marrow toxicity (decreased platelet and white blood counts) in animals treated with cisplatin but not with the Bamets were found. These results indicate that, owing to strong antitumor activity together with absence of side effects, Bamet-UD2 may be useful in the treatment of liver tumors.

Prevention of ursodeoxycholate hepatotoxicity in the rabbit by conjugation with N-methyl amino acids.

The effect of dietary administration of four different amino acid (N-acyl) conjugates of ursodeoxycholic acid on biliary bile acid composition, liver tests and hepatic morphology by light microscopy was examined in the rabbit. Each group of four to five rabbits received a chow diet supplemented with a single conjugate of ursodeoxycholic acid ursodeoxycholyl-glycine, ursodeoxycholyl-sarcosine, ursodeoxycholyl-taurine or ursodeoxycholyl-N-methyltaurine for 3 wks at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day; a control group received chow alone. After 3 wks of feeding, animals receiving ursodeoxycholyl-glycine or ursodeoxycholyl-taurine had hepatotoxicity associated with abnormal liver tests. Lithocholic acid made up 11% +/- 2.7% of biliary bile acids in the ursodeoxycholyl-glycine and 10% +/- 2.2% in the ursodeoxycholyl-taurine group. In contrast, animals receiving ursodeoxycholyl-sarcosine or ursodeoxycholyl-N-methyltaurine had neither hepatotoxicity nor abnormal liver tests and the proportion of lithocholic acid in biliary bile acids increased much less. Complementary studies showed that ursodeoxycholyl-sarcosine and ursodeoxycholyl-N-methyltaurine were not biotransformed during hepatic transport and were resistant to deconjugation and dehydroxylation in the rabbit. These experiments indicate that the N-methyl amino acid conjugates of ursodeoxycholic acid are nontoxic in the rabbit and resist deconjugation and dehydroxylation. Such resistance decreases formation of lithocholic acid in the colon, thus reducing its accumulation and consequent induction of hepatotoxicity.