Tolerability profile of topical cannabidiol and palmitoylethanolamide: a compilation of single-centre randomized evaluator-blinded clinical and in vitro studies in normal skin.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies have investigated the adverse effect profile of oral cannabinoids; however, few studies have provided sufficient data on the tolerability of topical cannabinoids in human participants. AIM: To assess the tolerability profile of several commercial topical formulations containing cannabidiol (CBD) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) on the skin of healthy human participants. METHODS: Three human clinical trials and one in vitro study were conducted. The potential for skin irritation, sensitization and phototoxicity of several products, were assessed via patch testing on healthy human skin. The products assessed included two formulations containing CBD and PEA, one containing hemp seed oil and four concentrations of CBD alone. Ocular toxicity was tested using a traditional hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane model with three CBD, PEA and hemp seed oil formulations. RESULTS: There was no irritation or sensitization of the products evident via patch testing on healthy participants. Additionally, mild phototoxicity of a hemp seed oil product was found at the 48-h time point compared with the negative control. The in vitro experiment demonstrated comparable effects of cannabinoid products with historically nonirritating products. CONCLUSION: These specific formulations of CBD- and PEA-containing products are nonirritating and nonsensitizing in healthy adults, and further encourage similar research assessing their long-term safety and efficacy in human participants with dermatological diseases. There are some limitations to the study: (i) external validity may be limited as formulations from a single manufacturer were used for this study, while vast heterogeneity exists across unregulated, commercial CBD products on the market; and (ii) products were assessed only on normal, nondiseased human skin, and therefore extrapolation to those with dermatological diseases cannot be assumed.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Palmitoylethanolamide and Its New Formulations in Synergy with Different Antioxidant Molecules Present in Diets.

The use of a complete nutritional approach seems increasingly promising to combat chronic inflammation. The choice of healthy sources of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, associated with regular physical activity and avoidance of smoking is essential to fight the war against chronic diseases. At the base of the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or antioxidant action of the diets, there are numerous molecules, among which some of a lipidic nature very active in the inflammatory pathway. One class of molecules found in diets with anti-inflammatory actions are ALIAmides. Among all, one is particularly known for its ability to counteract the inflammatory cascade, the Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA). PEA is a molecular that is present in nature, in numerous foods, and is endogenously produced by our body, which acts as a balancer of inflammatory processes, also known as endocannabionoid-like. PEA is often used in the treatment of both acute and chronic inflammatory pathologies, either alone or in association with other molecules with properties, such as antioxidants or analgesics. This review aims to illustrate an overview of the different diets that are involved in the process of opposition to the inflammatory cascade, focusing on capacity of PEA and new formulations in synergy with other molecules.

The pharmacology of palmitoylethanolamide and first data on the therapeutic efficacy of some of its new formulations.

Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) has emerged as a potential nutraceutical, because this compound is naturally produced in many plant and animal food sources, as well as in cells and tissues of mammals, and endowed with important neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and analgesic actions. Several efforts have been made to identify the molecular mechanism of action of PEA and explain its multiple effects both in the central and the peripheral nervous system. Here, we provide an overview of the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of PEA in neurodegenerative disorders, pain perception and inflammatory diseases. The current knowledge of new formulations of PEA with smaller particle size (i.e. micronized and ultra-micronized) when given alone or in combination with antioxidant flavonoids (i.e. luteolin) and stilbenes (i.e. polydatin) is also reviewed. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Principles of Pharmacological Research of Nutraceuticals. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.11/issuetoc.

[Pharmacological therapy of temporomandibular joint pain]. / Medikamentöse Therapie bei Kiefergelenkschmerzen.

Pharmacological interventions in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain differ from corresponding therapeutic interventions of jaw muscle (myofascial) pain. An actual systematic literature search lists and evaluates available articles on randomised controlled trials for treatment of arthralgia of the TMJ. On the basis of the few available trial reports, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) seem to be effective, but side effects and drug interactions need to be considered. In relation to other therapeutic modalities, the rapidity of the onset of action of NSAIDs seems to be different, and the extension of side effects can be varied or reduced by changing the application route (oral versus topical). Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as dietary supplement for special medical purposes can apparently evoke positive therapeutic effects in TMJ arthralgia which need to be analysed in further studies.

Impact of portacaval anastomosis on plasma fatty acid profile in cirrhosis: a randomized 24-month follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Portacaval anastomosis has an hypolipemic effect in familial hypercholesterolemia and in healthy animals. In cirrhosis, it raises serum cholesterol, but there is no information on its effect upon plasma fatty acids. However, indirect data suggest that portacaval shunting might contribute to the polyunsaturated fatty acid deficit of these patients. We assessed the effect of portacaval anastomosis on plasma fatty acid profile in cirrhosis. METHODS: Forty-four Child-Pugh class A/B bleeding cirrhotics were randomized to be treated with portacaval anastomosis (n = 20) or nonsurgical therapy (n = 24). Fatty acid profile in plasma total lipids, alcohol intake, anthropometry, Child-Pugh score, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and antioxidant micronutrients were assessed before and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery or the start of nonsurgical therapy. Time course of plasma fatty acids was assessed using unbalanced repeated measures models with the above mentioned variables acting as covariates. RESULTS: No changes in the time course of percent plasma saturated, monounsaturated, and essential fatty acids were found between groups. Percent long-chain omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids decreased during follow-up in shunted patients compared with controls (p = .007 and p < .0005). However, this was not due to a true decrease in polyunsaturated fatty acid levels but to greater increases in saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid concentrations in shunted patients compared with control patients (p = .047 and p = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Portacaval anastomosis does not worsen plasma polyunsaturated fatty acid deficiency in cirrhosis. However, by increasing saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, it further decreases plasma lipid unsaturation.