RESUMEN
Accumulating data have now shown strong evidence that COVID-19 infection leads to the occurrence of neurological signs with different injury severity. Anosmia and agueusia are now well documented and included in the criteria list for diagnosis, and specialists have stressed that doctors screen COVID-19 patients for these two signs. The eventual brainstem dysregulation, due to the invasion of SARS CoV-2, as a cause of respiratory problems linked to COVID-19, has also been extensively discussed. All these findings lead to an implication of the central nervous system in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Here we provide additional elements that could explain other described signs like appetite loss, vomiting, and nausea. For this, we investigated the role of brainstem structures located in the medulla oblongata involved in food intake and vomiting control. We also discussed the possible pathways the virus uses to reach the brainstem, i.e., neurotropic and hematogenous (with its two variants) routes.
Asunto(s)
Anorexia/fisiopatología , Regulación del Apetito/fisiología , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Ingestión de Alimentos/fisiología , Náusea/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Núcleo Solitario/fisiopatología , Vómitos/fisiopatología , Ageusia/etiología , Anorexia/etiología , Área Postrema/fisiopatología , Barrera Hematoencefálica , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipotálamo/fisiopatología , Bulbo Raquídeo/fisiopatología , Náusea/etiología , Vías Nerviosas/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Nervio Olfatorio , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Nervio Vago , Vómitos/etiologíaRESUMEN
Increased cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) is a key feature of heart failure (HF) and is associated with poor outcome. There is evidence that central angiotensinergic mechanisms contribute to the increased CSNA in HF, but the central sites involved are unknown. In an ovine, rapid pacing model of HF, we investigated the contribution of the lamina terminalis and area postrema to the increased CSNA and also the responses to fourth ventricular infusion of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan. Ablation of the area postrema or sham lesion (n = 6/group), placement of lamina terminalis lesion electrodes (n = 5), and insertion of a cannula into the fourth ventricle (n = 6) were performed when ejection fraction was ~ 50%. When ejection fraction was < 40%, recording electrodes were implanted, and after 3 days, resting CSNA and baroreflex control of CSNA were measured before and following lesion of the lamina terminalis, in groups with lesion or sham lesion of the area postrema and before and following infusion of losartan (1.0 mg/h for 5 h) into the fourth ventricle. In conscious sheep with HF, lesion of the lamina terminalis did not significantly change CSNA (91 ± 2 vs. 86 ± 3 bursts/100 heart beats), whereas CSNA was reduced in the group with lesion of the area postrema (89 ± 3 to 45 ± 10 bursts/100 heart beats, P < 0.01) and following fourth ventricular infusion of losartan (89 ± 3 to 48 ± 8 bursts/100 heartbeats, P < 0.01). These findings indicate that the area postrema and brainstem angiotensinergic mechanisms may play an important role in determining the increased CSNA in HF.