Clinical and genetic predictors of diabetes drug's response.

Diabetes is a major health problem worldwide. Glycemic control is the main goal in the management of type 2 diabetes. While many anti-diabetic drugs and guidelines are available, almost half of diabetic patients do not reach their treatment goal and develop complications. The glucose-lowering response to anti-diabetic drug differs significantly between individuals. Relatively little is known about the factors that might underlie this response. The identification of predictors of response to anti-diabetic drugs is essential for treatment personalization. Unfortunately, the evidence on predictors of drugs response in type 2 diabetes is scarce. Only a few trials were designed for specific groups of patients (e.g. patients with renal impairment or older patients), while subgroup analyses of larger trials are frequently unreported. Physicians need help in picking the drug which provides the maximal benefit, with minimal side effects, in the right dose, for a specific patient, using an omics-based approach besides the phenotypic characteristics.

Acarbose plus metformin fixed-dose combination in the management of type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing worldwide. Concerns in the management of diabetes include drug-induced hypoglycemia, poor control of postprandial blood glucose level and weight gain. A carbohydrate-rich diet can cause more load on the intestinal cells producing α-glucosidase. Many patients need combination treatment based on their level of glycemic control and other associated parameters. In such cases, a therapy that provides effective glycemic control with minimal or no risk of adverse events like hypoglycemia or weight gain is highly desired. The chances of cardiovascular events are high in diabetes patients; hence, medicines providing benefits beyond glycemic control such as reduced cardiovascular risk factors may be ideal in such patients. AREAS COVERED: Current available data are related to the rationale and clinical trials on the fixed-dose combination of acarbose plus metformin in management of type 2 diabetes. EXPERT OPINION: Combination therapy is routinely prescribed in the management of T2DM. Drugs with complimentary mechanisms should be used to maximize the efficacy of combination therapy. The combination of metformin and acarbose is a rational therapy because of their different and complimentary mechanisms of action, which provides effective glycemic control with additional cardiovascular benefits and minimizes adverse events.

Is acarbose equivalent to tolbutamide as first treatment for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in general practice? A randomised controlled trial.

We performed a double blind randomised controlled trial in general practice to assess equivalence between tolbutamide and acarbose with respect to the effect on mean HbA(1c) in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. Secondary objectives were to compare the effects of both treatments on fasting and post-load blood glucose and insulin levels, lipids, and adverse events. Patients were randomised to receive acarbose, titrated step-wise to a maximum of 100mg three times daily (n=48) or tolbutamide, similarly titrated to a maximum of 2000 mg in three doses (n=48). The two treatments were considered equivalent if the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in mean HbA(1c) levels was within the range -0.4 to 0.4%. Results were analysed on an intention-to-treat, per-protocol and on worst-case basis. Both agents reduced the HbA(1c) percentage and fasting blood glucose levels. The difference in mean decrease of HbA(1c) was 0.6% in favour of tolbutamide (90% CI 0.3, 0.9; 95% CI 0.2, 1.0). A worst-case analysis, assuming no change in HbA(1c) for dropouts, yielded a difference in mean decrease of 0.9% (90% CI 0.6, 1.2) in favour of tolbutamide. The difference in mean decrease of fasting blood glucose was 1.0 mmol/l in favour of tolbutamide (95% CI 0.3, 1.7). There were no significant differences in post-load blood glucose, fasting and post-load insulin levels, or lipids. In the acarbose group significantly more patients (15 versus 3) discontinued therapy because of adverse effects, mostly of gastrointestinal origin. We conclude that the results of this study favour tolbutamide over acarbose as first treatment for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.