RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dementia and atrial fibrillation (AF) have many shared risk factors. Besides, patients with dementia are under-represented in randomized trials, and even if AF is present, oral anticoagulants (OACs) are not prescribed frequently. This study aimed to report the incidence of newly diagnosed AF in dementia patients, and the impacts of use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA; e.g., warfarin) and non-VKA OAC (NOACs) on stroke and bleeding outcomes. METHODS: Our study utilized the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 554,074 patients with dementia were compared with 554,074 age- and sex-matched patients without dementia regarding the risk of incident AF. Among patients with dementia who experienced incident AF, the risks of clinical events of patients treated with warfarin or NOACs were compared with those without OACs (reference group). RESULTS: The risk of incident AF was greater for patients with dementia compared with those without (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.054; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.040-1.068 for all types of dementia, aHR: 1.035; 95% CI: 1.020-1.051 for presenile/senile dementia, and aHR: 1.125; 95% CI: 1.091-1.159 for vascular dementia). Among patients with dementia and experienced incident AF, warfarin use was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke (aHR: 1.290; 95% CI: 1.156-1.440), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; aHR: 1.678; 95% CI: 1.346-2.090), and major bleeding (aHR: 1.192; 95% CI: 1.073-1.323) compared with non-OACs. NOAC use was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke (aHR: 0.421; 95% CI: 0.352-0.503) and composite risk of ischemic stroke or major bleeding (aHR: 0.544; 95% CI: 0.487-0.608) compared with non-OACs. These results were consistent among the patients after the propensity matching. CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort, the risk of newly diagnosed AF was higher in patients with dementia (all dementia, presenile/senile dementia, and vascular dementia) compared with those without dementia. For patients with dementia who experienced incident AF, NOAC use was associated with a better clinical outcome compared with non-OAC. Patients with dementia require a holistic approach to their care and management, including the use of NOACs to reduce the risks of clinical events.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Fibrilación Atrial , Demencia Vascular , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Demencia Vascular/inducido químicamente , Demencia Vascular/complicaciones , Demencia Vascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Tenecteplase has been compared to alteplase in acute stroke randomized trials, with similar outcomes and safety measures, but higher doses of tenecteplase have been associated with higher hemorrhage rates in some studies. Limited data are available on the safety of tenecteplase outside of clinical trials. METHODS: We examined the safety measures of intracranial hemorrhage, angioedema, and serious extracranial adverse events in a 21-hospital integrated healthcare system that switched from alteplase (0.9 mg/kg, maximum dose 90 mg) to tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg, maximum dose 25 mg) for acute ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Among 3,689 subjects, no significant differences were seen between tenecteplase and alteplase in the rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hemorrhage, or volume of parenchymal hemorrhage. Symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) was not different between the two agents: sICH by NINDS criteria was 2.0 % for alteplase vs 2.3 % for tenecteplase (P = 0.57), and sICH by SITS criteria was 0.8 % vs 1.1 % (P = 0.39). Adjusted logistic regression models also showed no differences between tenecteplase and alteplase: the odds ratio for tenecteplase (vs alteplase) modeling sICH by NINDS criteria was 0.9 (95 % CI 0.33 - 2.46, P = 0.83) and the odds ratio for tenecteplase modeling sICH by SITS criteria was 1.12 (95 % CI 0.25 - 5.07, P = 0.89). Rates of angioedema and serious extracranial adverse events were low and did not differ between tenecteplase and alteplase. Elapsed door-to-needle times showed a small improvement after the switch to tenecteplase (51.8 % treated in under 30 min with tenecteplase vs 43.5 % with alteplase, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In use outside of clinical trials, complication rates are similar between tenecteplase and alteplase. In the context of a stroke telemedicine program, the rates of hemorrhage observed with either agent were lower than expected based on prior trials and registry data. The more easily prepared tenecteplase was associated with a lower door-to-needle time.
Asunto(s)
Angioedema , Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Tenecteplasa/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Hemorragias Intracraneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Angioedema/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for systemic embolism and ischaemic stroke. Furthermore, AF-related strokes are associated with higher mortality, greater disability, longer hospital stays and lower rates of hospital discharge than strokes caused by other reasons. The aim of this review to summarise the existing evidence on the association of AF with ischemic stroke and provide insights on the pathophysiological mechanisms and the clinical management of patients with AF in order to reduce the burden of ischemic stroke. RECENT FINDINGS: Beyond Virchow's triad, several pathophysiological mechanisms associated with structural changes in the left atrium, which may precede the identification of AF, may contribute to the increased risk of arterial embolism in AF patients. Individualised thromboembolic risk stratification based on CHA2DS2-VASc score and clinically relevant biomarkers provides essential tool towards a personalised holistic approach in thromboembolism prevention. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of stroke prevention moving from vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to safer non-vitamin K direct oral anticoagulants in the majority of AF patients. Despite the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation, still the equilibrium between thrombosis and haemostasis in AF patients remains suboptimal and future directions in anticoagulation and cardiac intervention may provide novel treatment options in stroke prevention. This review summarises the pathophysiologic mechanisms of thromboembolism, aiming the current and potential future perspectives in stroke prevention in AF patients.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Isquemia Encefálica , Embolia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia/etiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración OralRESUMEN
Conventional mammalian ischemic stroke models for drug screening are technically challenging, laborious and time-consuming. In this study, using Ponatinib as an inducer, we developed and characterized a zebrafish ischemic stroke model. This zebrafish ischemic stroke had the cerebral vascular endothelial injury, thrombosis, reduced blood flow, inflammation and apoptosis as well as the reduced motility. The zebrafish ischemic stroke model was validated with 6 known human therapeutic drugs of ischemic stroke (Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Naoxintong capsules, Edaravone, Xingnaojing injection, Shuxuening injection). The mRNA levels of the neovascularization-related gene (vegfaa) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor gene (VEGFR), neurodevelopment related genes (mbp and α1-tubulin), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) were significantly downregulated; whereas apoptosis-related genes (caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-9 and bax/bcl-2), and inflammatory factor genes (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α and NF-κB) were remarkably upregulated in the model. These results suggest that the pathophysiology of Ponatinib-induced zebrafish ischemic stroke is similar to that of human ischemic stroke patients and this whole animal model could be used to study the complex cellular and molecular pathogenesis of ischemic stroke and to rapidly identify therapeutic agents.