RESUMEN
Purpose: To assess the clinical effects of preoperative, intraoperative, or preoperative combined with intraoperative intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: Ninety-eight eyes of 98 severe PDR patients undergoing vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade were randomly assigned to 3 groups: Group 1 (34 eyes) received IVC injections 3 to 5 days before surgery; Group 2 (35 eyes) received IVC injections at the end of surgery; and Group 3 (29 eyes) received IVC injections 3 to 5 days before and at the end of operation. Follow-up examinations were performed for 6 months. Results: The incidence and severity of intraoperative bleeding were not significantly different (P = 0.233). However, the duration of surgery was significantly shorter in Group 1 and Group 3 compared with Group 2 (P < 0.001). The incidences of early and late recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH) were 32.35%, 28.57%, and 13.80%, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mean best-corrected visual acuity had significantly increased to 1.25 ± 0.45 logMAR in Group 1, 1.29 ± 0.46 logMAR in Group 2, 1.16 ± 0.44 logMAR in Group 3 (all P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative VH, neovascular glaucoma, and retinal detachment in Group 3 was slightly lower, however, no significant differences were observed (all P > 0.05). In young patients, similar results were observed and Group 3 had better visual improvements (P = 0.037). Conclusions: Preoperative IVC injection could be a safe and effective adjunct in pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for severe PDR. Preoperative combined with intraoperative IVC are promising, especially in young patients.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vitrectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma Neovascular/epidemiología , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Desprendimiento de Retina/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/uso terapéutico , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Hemorragia Vítrea/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) used as a surgical adjuvant for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can stain cortical vitreous, control postoperative inflammation, and reduce retinal edema. Sterile endophthalmitis uncommonly complicates office-based IVTA injection. The authors report a new complication of IVTA depot injection at the end of PPV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective records review of all patients treated at the Cincinnati Eye Institute with PPV between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, who developed a triad of sterile endophthalmitis, atrophic retinal breaks under the depot IVTA in the inferior retina, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Eyes with flap tears, solely superior breaks, or stretch holes from proliferative vitreoretinopathy causing RRD were excluded. RESULTS: Eight eyes of eight patients (four males and four females; mean age: 73.7 years) who received 4 mg or 8 mg IVTA depot at the end of PPV surgery presented at a mean of 23.5 days following PPV with RRD (one macula-involving, seven macula-sparing), requiring treatment with PPV in six eyes and laser retinopexy alone in two eyes. Seven eyes that underwent membrane peeling (MP) received IVT to prevent cystoid macular edema (CME) and one eye with prior MP was treated for CME. Mean vitreous inflammation was 2+ cell at 1 week postoperatively. Two patients had documented sterile endophthalmitis within the first week requiring vitreous cultures and antibiotics injections. Visual acuity (VA) for eyes requiring PPV for RD repair declined from 20/90 preoperatively to 20/212 at 6 months postoperatively. VA for eyes amenable to laser alone improved from 20/53 to 20/35. All eyes remained attached, with the exception of one patient who refused further treatment after developing recurrent detachment from PVR. CONCLUSIONS: Particle-induced sterile endophthalmitis from IVTA depot at the end of PPV surgery resulted in atrophic inferior retinal breaks and RRD as a newly described entity coined "erosive retinopathy." All retinal detachment surgeries required silicone oil tamponade. Poor visual outcome at 6 months was common for eyes requiring PPV for RD repair. The authors recommend avoiding IVTA depot injection at the end of PPV. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:613-619.].
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Desprendimiento de Retina/inducido químicamente , Perforaciones de la Retina/inducido químicamente , Triamcinolona Acetonida/administración & dosificación , Vitrectomía/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Vitrectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Several factors predispose to the occurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, including cataract surgery, myopia, and degenerative lesions of the peripheral retina as well as eye trauma. This study aims to compare the anatomical and functional outcome of the two surgical techniques (AB interno vs AB externo) in our Hospital. We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study in the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Mohamed VI in Marrakech, over a period of 3 years, ranging from January 2013 to December 2015. During the study period we compared two groups of people: the first group undergoing surgery by an external approach (cryoapplication of the dehiscences with episcleral indentation) while the second undergoing surgery by endo-ocular approach. Group A or AB externo group included 26 eyes (26 patients) while Group B or vitrectomy with internal tamponade group included 22 eyes (22 patients). In the AB externo group, the average age was 54.92 years against 51.64 years in the AB interno group, with a slight predominance of males in both groups. After the first surgery, retinal reapplication was obtained in both groups with no significant difference, (about 80.76% in Group A versus 81.82% of the second group). In both groups failure was caused advanced vitreoretinal proliferation (4 cases), de novo breaks (3 cases) and breaks which had not been detected on first examinations (2 cases). All these cases underwent reoperation by AB interno approach: patients of group A underwent complete vitrectomy with revision of the indentation +/- internal limiting membrane peeling with internal gas tamponade while patients of group B underwent complementary vitrectomy with dissection of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and an internal tamponade with silicone oil. After a mean follow-up period of 12 months, there was no significant difference in visual acuity between the 2 groups, with more than one third of the patients who had regained visual acuity between 1/10 and 5/10 (about 34,61% in AB externo group and 36,36% in AB interno group). Given the technological advances in vitrectomy, the current trend is the endo-ocular surgery however ab-externo surgery is mainly used in the treatment of retinal detachment with visible breaks which can be easily treated with indentation without advanced vitreoretineal proliferation (PVR A-B).
Asunto(s)
Endotaponamiento/métodos , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Vitrectomía/métodos , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Curvatura de la Esclerótica/métodos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
AIM: Main failure of diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) surgery is the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), causing higher re-detachment rates. We investigated whether the use of dexamethasone (DEX) implant at the end of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil tamponade might have an impact on these outcomes. DESIGN: Comparative, nonrandomized, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 eyes from 148 patients that underwent PPV with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD (with DEX implant, n = 52; without DEX implant, n = 96). METHODS: Consecutive patients' records were reviewed for time between TRD diagnosis and surgery; lens status before surgery and after 6, 12, and 24 months; retina attachment rate after primary PPV; change in postoperative PVR severity; rate of re-detachment at 6, 12, and 24 months; use of IOP lowering treatment after 6, 12, and 24 months; surgery details; intra- and postoperative complications. Correlations between outcome measures, postoperative PVR severity, and re-detachment rates were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in postoperative PVR severity and retinal re-detachment rates with and without the adjuvant use of DEX implant. RESULTS: Retinal re-detachment rates were significantly higher in the group of patients that did not receive DEX implant [11/96 (11.5%) vs. 0/52 (0%), p = 0.049; 11/84 (12.9%) vs. 4/52 (7.7%), p = 0.007; 14/71 (19.7%) vs. 5/52 (10%) p < 0.001 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively]. PVR severity correlated with retinal status at 12 and 24 months (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027, respectively). The difference in PVR severity between the two groups was statistically significant at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DEX implant at the end of PPV in patients with diabetic TRD improves PVR severity and decreases re-detachment rates. This should be considered as an option in the customized treatment of TRD.
Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Desprendimiento de Retina/tratamiento farmacológico , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Vitrectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Retina/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/efectos adversos , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Vitrectomía/efectos adversos , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/etiología , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We compared the efficacies of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal conbercept (IVC) as the adjuvant pretreatments for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion for tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 74 patients (79 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD. They received IVC (37 eyes) or IVR (42 eyes) at standard doses 3-5 days preoperatively and were followed up for â¼6 months. Anatomic success rate, intra- and postoperative complications, and visual outcomes were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Initial (IVC vs. IVR: 97% vs. 98%) and final anatomic success rates (100% in each group) and mean visual acuity changes were not significantly different (P = 0.46). Intraoperative complications [iatrogenic retinal breaks (P = 0.58) and intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.66)], postoperative complications [fibrin formation (P = 0.51), postoperative preretinal bleeding (P = 0.88), progressing or persistent neovascular glaucoma (P = 0.63), progressive fibrovascular proliferation (P = 0.93), and recurrent retinal detachment (P = 0.93)], and surgical variables [surgical time (P = 0.53)] were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conbercept and ranibizumab are equally effective surgical adjuvants for vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion in patients with diabetic TRD.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Desprendimiento de Retina/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceites de Silicona/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ranibizumab/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , VitrectomíaRESUMEN
Purpose: To describe the presentation and management of severe ocular adverse events following treatment with pembrolizumab for cutaneous metastatic melanoma. Methods: Interventional case report. Results: A 73-year-old Caucasian man receiving pembrolizumab treatment for metastatic melanoma presented with panuveitis and subsequent profound hypotony, choroidal effusions, and optic disk swelling bilaterally. Oral prednisolone controlled intraocular inflammation. However, bilateral hypotony persisted which was managed over a 12-month period with ocular viscoelastic device injections into the anterior chamber of both eyes. There was also phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and silicone oil (SO) tamponade performed on the left eye only. Intraocular pressure (IOP) stabilized (>6 mmHg) with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60. Conclusion: We report a severe adverse event from pembrolizumab therapy resulting in uveitis and persistent hypotony. Repeat injections of high viscosity OVD achieved an increase in IOP up to 12 months. This technique may be a useful adjuvant or alternative to PPV and SO.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipotensión Ocular/tratamiento farmacológico , Panuveítis/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Viscosuplementos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Endotaponamiento , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Masculino , Melanoma/secundario , Hipotensión Ocular/inducido químicamente , Hipotensión Ocular/diagnóstico , Panuveítis/inducido químicamente , Panuveítis/diagnóstico por imagen , Facoemulsificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/secundario , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Agudeza Visual , VitrectomíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in the management of retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears. METHODS: We reviewed 45 eyes of 42 patients with primary retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears over 10 years at a tertiary referral centre. Patients underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy without adjuvant scleral buckling by a single surgeon and had follow-up at least 6 months after silicone oil removal. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 37 ± 35 months. Seven eyes (16%) had grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and 16 (36%) had a giant retinal tear ≥180° at baseline. The primary reattachment rate was 84%, and the overall final anatomical success rate was 98%. The mean Snellen visual acuity equivalent at the final visit was 20/58. Final visual acuity ≥20/40 was achieved in 64%. The mean duration of silicone oil tamponade was 10.5 ± 4 weeks. By the final visit, silicone oil had been removed from 44 eyes (98%). CONCLUSION: The high rates of anatomical and functional success support management of giant retinal tears-associated retinal detachment with vitrectomy without adjuvant scleral buckling. Removal of silicone oil at the earliest possible time helps to avoid complications such as keratopathy, glaucoma and visual loss without apparent reason.
Asunto(s)
Endotaponamiento/métodos , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Perforaciones de la Retina/cirugía , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Agudeza Visual , Vitrectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desprendimiento de Retina/diagnóstico , Desprendimiento de Retina/etiología , Perforaciones de la Retina/complicaciones , Perforaciones de la Retina/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Curvatura de la Esclerótica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study is to determine whether there is any difference in the quality of life of patients with a blind eye with long-term silicone oil compared to without. METHOD: Patients with either long-term silicone oil in situ (N = 17), defined as a period greater than 6 months duration with no plan for future removal, or those with a phthisical, non oil-filled eye were identified (N = 13). Two validated questionnaires (NEI VFQ-25 and the FACE-Q) that cover indicators for visual function, pain and cosmesis were sent to all patients in the two cohorts. RESULTS: There was no significant difference found in quality of life outcomes between the two groups in terms of visual function, pain or cosmesis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support a holistic approach to the consent process before vitreoretinal surgery. Patients that may need to undergo multiple vitreoretinal procedures, where the endstage result is a long-term silicone oil fill, should be informed that their functional outcome may be similar to having no surgical intervention.
Asunto(s)
Ceguera/psicología , Ojo/patología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Desprendimiento de Retina/psicología , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atrofia/psicología , Endotaponamiento , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Vitrectomía , Cirugía VitreorretinianaRESUMEN
Silicone oil (SO) is an intraocular surgical adjuvant that reduces the surgical complications in refractory retinal diseases, although membrane and cellular proliferation is often seen even in SO-filled eyes. We hypothesised that the fluid in the space between the SO and the retina, named the "sub-silicone oil fluid (SOF)", enhances these biological responses. We proposed a safe method for SOF extraction. We also analysed inflammatory cytokine expressions and SOF osmotic pressures from eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and macular hole-associated retinal detachment (MHRD). Interleukin (IL)-10, IL-12p40, IL-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the SOF with PVR were significantly higher than in those with RRD or MHRD. Fibroblast growth factor-2, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-8, VEGF, and transforming growth factor beta 1 levels in eyes with exacerbated PDR indicated a significantly higher expression than those with simple PDR. IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha in eyes with exacerbated PVR demonstrated a significantly higher expression than in those with simple PVR. However, there was no difference in SOF osmotic pressure between group of each disease. These studies indicate that disease-specific SOF is a significant reflection of disease status.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas/genética , Enfermedades de la Retina/genética , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Retinopatía Diabética/genética , Retinopatía Diabética/patología , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión Osmótica , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Retina/metabolismo , Retina/patología , Retina/cirugía , Desprendimiento de Retina/genética , Desprendimiento de Retina/patología , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Retina/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Retina/patología , Enfermedades de la Retina/cirugía , Aceites de Silicona/efectos adversos , Vitrectomía/efectos adversos , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/patología , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugíaRESUMEN
Silicone oil microdroplets may act as adjuvants, promoting unwanted immune responses against both foreign and self-proteins. Proteins often unfold upon adsorption to silicone oil microdroplets, but it is unclear how such unfolding might affect the immune response. In this study, we found that hen egg lysozyme (HEL) readily adsorbed to silicone oil microdroplets and perturbed the conformation of HEL. We compared the immune response to injections of HEL formulated in the presence and absence of silicone oil microdroplets in both wild-type mice and transgenic littermates that express a soluble form of HEL (sHEL), thus rendering them immunologically tolerant to this nominal self-antigen. Following 2 subcutaneous injections of a HEL formulation containing silicone oil microdroplets, wild-type mice exhibited a stronger IgG1 antibody response against HEL compared to the response in wild-type mice that administered an oil-free HEL formulation. However, when HEL was subcutaneously administered to sHEL-transgenic mice, immunological tolerance to sHEL was not broken in the presence of silicone oil microdroplets. Thus, although structural perturbations in proteins adsorbed to silicone oil microdroplets may augment the immune response, in the case of endogenously expressed proteins, such structural perturbations may not be sufficient to result in a breach of immunological tolerance.
Asunto(s)
Muramidasa/química , Muramidasa/inmunología , Aceites de Silicona/química , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/química , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/farmacología , Adsorción , Animales , Formación de Anticuerpos/efectos de los fármacos , Pollos , Femenino , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Transgénicos , Muramidasa/administración & dosificación , Agregado de Proteínas , Conformación Proteica , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Background Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) occurs in 10â% of patients with retinal detachment and is characterized by excessive epi-, sub- or intraretinal contraction. Corticosteroids have been shown to counter this contraction. Patients and Methods Retrospective review of 5 patients (3 females, 2 males) with recurrent retinal detachment with stage C PVR. The mean age was 61.2 ± 20.5 years and myopia > - 5.0 dioptres was present in 3 eyes. Patients were treated with 23 g vitrectomy, retinectomy and endolaser, dexamethasone (Ozurdex®) injection under perfluorocarbone and 5500 cs silicone oil tamponade. Results After a total follow-up of 8.8 ± 6.4 months with silicone oil tamponade, the Ozurdex® implant was localised in the macula in 1 case, and in 4 cases behind the iris with a completely attached retina. Preoperative intraocular pressure was 11.0 ± 4.0 mmHg, which remained stable at 7.8 ± 3.5 mmHg at the end of the final follow-up. No localised adverse effects were observed of the implant on the retina or the iris. Conclusions The dexamethasone implant Ozurdex® is well tolerated in conjunction with silicone oil tamponade in eyes with retinal detachment and PVR. The implant may be a potential candidate for the prevention of PVR.
Asunto(s)
Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Endotaponamiento/métodos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/diagnóstico por imagen , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/patologíaRESUMEN
Therapeutic protein products can cause adverse immune responses in patients. The presence of subvisible particles is a potential contributing factor to the immunogenicity of parenterally administered therapeutic protein formulations. Silicone oil microdroplets, which derive from silicone oil used as a lubricating coating on barrels of prefilled glass syringes, are often found in formulations. In this study, we investigated the potential of silicone oil microdroplets to act as adjuvants to induce an immune response in mice against a recombinant murine protein. Antibody responses in mice to subcutaneous injections of formulations of recombinant murine growth hormone (rmGH) that contained silicone oil microdroplets were measured and compared to responses to oil-free rmGH formulations. When rmGH formulations containing silicone oil microdroplets were administered once every other week, anti-rmGH antibodies were not detected. In contrast, mice exhibited a small IgG1 response against rmGH when silicone oil-containing rmGH formulations were administered daily, and an anti-rmGH IgM response was observed at later time points. Our findings showed that silicone oil microdroplets can act as an adjuvant to promote a break in immunological tolerance and induce antibody responses against a recombinant self-protein.
Asunto(s)
Formación de Anticuerpos/inmunología , Hormona del Crecimiento/administración & dosificación , Hormona del Crecimiento/inmunología , Microesferas , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Animales , Formación de Anticuerpos/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Tamaño de la PartículaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term safety and efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (a-PRP) as adjuvant to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of highly myopic macular holes (MH). METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized interventional case series. Patients with MH associated with high myopia, with or without previous PPV, were included. All patients underwent 23-G PPV with the use of a-PRP. Anatomical and functional results of surgery were recorded. RESULTS: We included 7 eyes of 6 patients with highly myopic MH. Primary anatomical success was achieved in 7 out of 7 eyes. Mean best-corrected visual acuity improved by more than 1 line from baseline (0.66 ± 0.36 LogMAR) to final visit (0.52 ± 0.25 logMAR), but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.246, Wilcoxon test). No surgical-related complications were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a-PRP as adjuvant to PPV with ILM peeling is effective in the treatment of highly myopic MH. This approach may represent a valid alternative to the inverted ILM flap technique, with comparable visual and anatomical results and the advantage of a simpler procedure. Further studies are necessary to confirm its usefulness in the management of high myopic MH.
Asunto(s)
Miopía Degenerativa/terapia , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Perforaciones de la Retina/terapia , Vitrectomía , Anciano , Membrana Basal/cirugía , Endotaponamiento , Femenino , Fluorocarburos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miopía Degenerativa/complicaciones , Miopía Degenerativa/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Perforaciones de la Retina/diagnóstico por imagen , Perforaciones de la Retina/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza VisualRESUMEN
Subvisible particles in a therapeutic protein product may act as adjuvants to promote unwanted immune responses against the protein. Silicone oil is used as a lubricant in prefilled syringes, and microdroplets of silicone oil are often detected in protein formulations expelled from prefilled syringes. In order to test the adjuvant potency of silicone oil microdroplets, antibody responses in mice to subcutaneous injections of formulations of ovalbumin (OVA) that contained silicone oil microdroplets were measured. These responses were compared against responses to oil-free OVA formulations and to OVA formulations that contained microparticulate aluminum hydroxide ("alum"), the common vaccine adjuvant. When administered with high concentrations of silicone oil microdroplets, OVA formulations elicited strong anti-OVA IgG1 and IgG2a antibody responses. These responses were equivalent to those observed when alum microparticles were added to OVA formulations, suggesting that silicone oil can act as a potent adjuvant. However, when OVA formulations were prepared with lower levels of silicone oil that had been obtained directly from commercial siliconized syringes, the anti-OVA antibody response was not enhanced significantly compared with responses against OVA alone.
Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/farmacología , Formación de Anticuerpos/efectos de los fármacos , Ovalbúmina/inmunología , Aceites de Silicona/farmacología , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Aluminio/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Aluminio/farmacología , Animales , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ovalbúmina/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , JeringasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyse the postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes in addition to complications after vitreoretinal surgery for patients with shotgun eye injuries related to hunting accidents. MATERIALS: Retrospective review of the clinical records of all cases of shotgun eye injuries presented between January 2000 and January 2011 and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Collection of demographics, type of injury, choice of management, complications and final surgical success with final visual acuity is reported. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 19 patients (all male) with a mean age of 36.1 years (range 16-60 years) were included in the study. Mean postoperative follow-up was 47.5 months (range 15-118 months). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation ranged from perception of light to 20/200. Ten eyes had a penetrating injury and 10 others had a perforating injury. All the eyes underwent an initial vitrectomy and the intraocular pellet was removed in all the 10 penetrating injuries. Concurrent cataract surgery was performed in 12 cases, internal tamponade was used in 15 cases and a supplemental encircling scleral buckle was inserted in 12 cases. One additional vitreoretinal surgery was required in seven cases (35%) and two additional surgeries required in two other cases (10%). At last follow-up BCVA ranged from NPL to 20/20 and was 20/100 or better in 10 eyes (50%). All patients had a flat retina except for two cases (10%) that developed severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that vitreoretinal surgery can offer good visual rehabilitation in patients with shotgun eye injuries.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Cirugía Vitreorretiniana , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Endotaponamiento , Cuerpos Extraños en el Ojo/fisiopatología , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/fisiopatología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Curvatura de la Esclerótica , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/administración & dosificación , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/fisiopatología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency of treating selected cases of inferior retinal detachment in silicone oil-filled eyes using a supplemental scleral buckling with external drainage of subretinal fluid, versus performing a second vitreoretinal surgery and silicone oil endotamponade. METHODS: A prospective interventional pilot study that was performed on silicone oil-filled eyes with inferior retinal detachment. Twenty-three eyes of 23 consecutive patients were alternatively distributed between 2 groups: Group A included 12 eyes treated with supplemental scleral buckling with drainage of subretinal fluid and without the removal of silicone oil, and Group B included 11 eyes treated with silicone oil removal, vitreoretinal surgery, and reinjection of silicone oil. The preoperative data included indications and details of primary vitreoretinal surgery, cause of retinal redetachment, subretinal fluid, grade of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, lens status, and the duration between primary vitreoretinal surgery and reoperation. The postoperative examination included the best-corrected visual acuity, retina status, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, silicone oil, and any reported complication. Follow-up examinations were scheduled at Day 1, weekly for 1 month, and monthly thereafter till the end of the follow-up period which extended for at least 2 months after silicone oil removal. RESULTS: The average number of detached clock hours per eye was 2.7 in Group A and 2.4 in Group B, caused by a mean of 1.58 ± 0.80 break per eye in Group A and 1.48 ± 0.66 break per eye in Group B. The mean interval between the primary vitreoretinal surgery and the scleral buckling procedure in Group A patients was 2.83 ± 1.22 months (range, 1-5 months), while in Group B, the mean interval between the primary and the secondary vitreoretinal surgeries was 3.00 ± 1.61 months (range, 1-6 months). The mean operative time was statistically significantly (P < 0.05) shorter in Group A (38.7 ± 11.2 minutes) than in Group B (65.3 ± 15.1 minutes). The mean follow-up duration was 15.00 ± 3.22 months in Group A and 14.18 ± 2.99 months in Group B. After silicone oil removal, the retina was attached in 10 of the 12 eyes (83.3%) and redetached in 2 eyes (16.7%) in Group A, while in Group B, the retina was attached in 9 of the 11 eyes (81.8%) and redetached in 2 eyes (18.2%) after silicone oil removal. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity has improved from 1.82 ± 0.72 to 1.36 ± 0.52 in Group A patients (P > 0.05) and from 1.93 ± 0.74 to 1.55 ± 0.63 in Group B patients (P > 0.05) at the end of the follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: For selected cases of inferior retinal detachment in silicone oil-filled eyes, supplemental scleral buckling could be as effective as a second vitreoretinal surgery. Scleral buckling could offer a faster, less invasive, and better economic alternative to repeated vitreoretinal surgery for treatment of such cases.
Asunto(s)
Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Curvatura de la Esclerótica/métodos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Cirugía Vitreorretiniana/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Agudeza Visual , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: this study was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of 6 root canal filling materials and a negative control agent against 18 strains of bacteria isolated from infected root canals of primary molar teeth using agar diffusion assay. MATERIALS: Aloevera with sterile water Zinc oxide and Eugenol, Zinc oxide-Eugenol with aloevera, Calcium hydroxide and sterile water, Calcium hydroxide with sterile water and aloevera, Calcium hydroxide and Iodoform (Metapex) and Vaseline (Control). MIC and MBC of aloevera was calculated. RESULTS: All materials except Vaseline showed varied antimicrobial activity against the test bacterias. The zones of inhibition were ranked into 4 inhibition categories based on the proportional distribution of the data. All the 18 bacterial isolates were classified under 2 groups based on Gram positive and Gram negative aerobes. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness between materials tested with each of the bacterial groupings. CONCLUSION: Aloevera + Sterile Water was found to have superior antimicrobial activity against most of the microorganisms followed by ZOE + Aloevera, calcium hydroxide + Aloevera, ZOE, calcium hydroxide, Metapex in the descending order and Vaseline showed no inhibition.
Asunto(s)
Aloe , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Cavidad Pulpar/microbiología , Bacterias Anaerobias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular/farmacología , Diente Primario/microbiología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Hidróxido de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Hidróxido de Calcio/farmacología , Niño , Preescolar , Fístula Dental/microbiología , Necrosis de la Pulpa Dental/microbiología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Yodados/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Yodados/farmacología , Ensayo de Materiales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Diente Molar/microbiología , Absceso Periapical/microbiología , Vaselina/farmacología , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Aceites de Silicona/farmacología , Cemento de Óxido de Zinc-Eugenol/administración & dosificación , Cemento de Óxido de Zinc-Eugenol/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the outcome of the treatment of complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs). DESIGN: Nonrandomized, multicenter, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-six surgeons from 48 countries spanning 5 continents reported primary procedures for 7678 RRDs. METHODS: Reported data included clinical manifestations, the method of repair, and the outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of retinal detachment repair (level 1 failure rate), remaining silicone oil at the study's conclusion (level 2 failure rate), and need for additional procedures to repair the detachments (level 3 failure rate). RESULTS: The main categories of complex retinal detachments evaluated in this investigation were: (1) grade B proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR; n = 917), (2) grade C-1 PVR (n = 637), (3) choroidal detachment or significant hypotony (n = 578), (4) large or giant retinal tears (n = 1167), and (5) macular holes (n = 153). In grade B PVR, the level 1 failure rate was higher when treated with a scleral buckle alone versus vitrectomy (P = 0.0017). In grade C-1 PVR, there was no statistically significant difference in the level 1 failure rate between those treated with vitrectomy, with or without scleral buckle, and those treated with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.7). Vitrectomy with a supplemental buckle had an increased failure rate compared with those who did not receive a buckle (P = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference in level 1 failure rate between tamponade with gas versus silicone oil in patients with grade B or C-1 PVR. Cases with choroidal detachment or hypotony treated with vitrectomy had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.0015). Large or giant retinal tears treated with vitrectomy also had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle (P = 7×10(-8)). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with retinal detachment, when choroidal detachment, hypotony, a large tear, or a giant tear is present, vitrectomy is the procedure of choice. In retinal detachments with PVR, tamponade with either gas or silicone oil can be considered. If a vitrectomy is to be performed, these data suggest that a supplemental buckle may not be helpful. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Coroides/cirugía , Endotaponamiento/métodos , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Perforaciones de la Retina/cirugía , Curvatura de la Esclerótica/métodos , Vitrectomía/métodos , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Coroides/complicaciones , Europa (Continente) , Fluorocarburos/administración & dosificación , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Oftalmología , Desprendimiento de Retina/etiología , Perforaciones de la Retina/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Sociedades Médicas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with Densiron-68 tamponade and 360° endolaser versus 20-gauge PPV with encircling scleral buckling (ESB) and an SF6 gas tamponade for the repair of primary pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional study. Eighty-two eyes of 82 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment groups: 23-gauge PPV/Densiron-68 (44 eyes, 54%) or 20-gauge PPV/ESB/SF6 (20%) (38 eyes, 46%). The inclusion criterion was the presence of primary pseudophakic retinal detachment with at least 1 retinal break between the 4- and 8-o'clock positions. The study protocol involved a minimum of 7 visits: baseline, day of surgery, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperation. Densiron-68 removal was performed within 12 weeks of the initial surgery. Two surgical procedures were required in the Densiron group to remove the oil. RESULTS: After the primary procedure, the retina was reattached in 90% (40 of 44) of cases in the 23-gauge PPV/Densiron group and in 92% (35 of 38) of cases in the 20-gauge PPV/ESB/SF6 group (P = 0.2, Fisher's exact test). After resolution of redetachments, final anatomical success rate rose to 97% (43 of 44) in the 23-gauge PPV/Densiron group and 94% (36 of 38) in the 20-gauge PPV/SB/SF6 group (P = 0.32, Fisher's exact test). Mean final best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.40 in the 23-gauge PPV/Densiron group and 0.48 in the 20-gauge PPV/ESB/SF6 group (P = 0.31, t-test). Operative time was significantly less in the 23-gauge PPV/Densiron group (P = 0.002, t-test). No statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups was recorded. CONCLUSION: Twenty-three-gauge PPV combined with Densiron-68 and 360° endolaser and 20-gauge PPV combined with ESB/SF6 seemed to have similar efficacy in the repair of primary pseudophakic retinal detachment. Supplementary scleral buckling can be avoided using a Densiron-68 tamponade for retinal detachment with inferior retinal breaks.