Growth hormone and Klotho.

Acromegaly is characterized by excessively high GH and IGF1 levels. Recent data suggest that soluble Klotho (sKlotho) is also elevated in patients with active acromegaly. sKlotho decreases towards normal following removal of the GH-producing pituitary adenoma. The Klotho gene was identified in mice following its accidental disruption by ectopic DNA. It is an ageing suppressor gene of restricted expression (mainly in kidneys, brain, and parathyroid and pituitary glands) encoding a transmembrane protein, mKlotho. mKlotho serves as a co-receptor in fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) signalling. FGF23 promotes urinary phosphate excretion and inhibits the synthesis of calcitriol. The ectodomain of mKlotho is enzymatically released to result in a humoral factor, sKlotho, which exerts systemic effects (on ion channels and signalling pathways), possibly by working as an enzyme that modifies glycans of cell surface glycoproteins. GH enhances renal phosphate reabsorption and calcitriol production, i.e. exerts effects in the proximal tubule opposing those attributed to mKlotho, and attenuates calciuria in the distal tubule similar to sKlotho. sKlotho can be measured in extracellular fluids (serum, urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) by an ELISA. In line with predominant expression of Klotho in kidneys and choroid plexus, concentrations of sKlotho are particularly high in urine and CSF. Determination of sKlotho in serum and urine (both presumably reflecting GH action on the kidneys) could be used as a supplementary tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. The question arises whether GH exerts selected actions via modifying activities of Klotho.

Ectopic secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) in neuroendocrine tumors: relevant clinical aspects.

The aim of this article is to briefly review the physiology of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and the diagnosis and treatment of GHRH-mediated acromegaly. Moreover, the role of GHRH and its antagonists in the pathogenesis and treatment of cancer will be reviewed. Hypothalamic GHRH is secreted into the portal system, binds to specific surface receptors of the somatotroph cell and elicits intracellular signals that modulate pituitary GH synthesis and/or secretion. GHRH-producing neurons have been well characterized in the hypothalamus by immunostaining techniques. Hypothalamic tumors, including hamartomas. choristomas, gliomas. and gangliocitomas. may produce excessive GHRH with subsequent GH hypersecretion and resultant acromegaly. GHRH is synthesized and expressed in multiple extrapituitary tissues. Excessive peripheral production of GHRH by a tumor source would therefore be expected to cause somatotroph cell hyperstimulation and increased GH secretion. The structure of hypothalamic GHRH was infact elucidated from material extracted from pancreatic GHRH-secreting tumors in two patients with acromegaly. Immunoreactive GHRH is present in several tumors, including carcinoid tumors, pancreatic cell tumors, small-cell lung cancers, adrenal adenomas, and pheochromocitomas which have been reported to secrete GHRH. Acromegaly in these patients. however, is uncommon. In a retrospective survey of 177 acromegalic patients only a single patient was identified with elevated plasma GHRH levels. Measuring GHRH plasma levels therefore provides a precise and cost-effective test for the diagnosis of ectopic acromegaly. Peripheral GHRH levels are not elevated in patients with hypothalamic GHRH- secreting tumors, supporting the notion that excess eutopic hypothalamic GHRH secretion into the hypophyseal portal system does not appreciably enter the systemic circulation. Elevated circulating GHRH levels, a normal or small-size pituitary gland, or clinical and biochemical features of other tumors known to be associated with extrapituitary acromegaly, are all indications for extrapituitary imaging. An enlarged pituitary is, however, often found on MRI of patients with peripheral GHRH-secreting tumors, and the radiologic diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma may be difficult to exclude. Surgical resection of the tumor secreting ectopic GHRH should reverse the hypersecretion of GH, and pituitary surgery should not be necessary in these patients. Nonresectable, disseminated or reccurrent carcinoid syndrome with ectopic GHRH secretion can also be managed medically with long-acting somatostatin analogs (octreotide and lanreotide). The presence of GHRH and its receptors in several extrahypothalamic tissues, including ovary, testis and the digestive tract, suggests that GHRH may have a regulatory role in these tissues. As previously mentioned, biologically or immunologically active GHRH and mRNA encoding GHRH have been found in several human malignant tumors. including cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary and their cell lines. The synthesis and evaluation of analogs with various modifications revealed that certain hydrophobic and helix-stabilizing amino acid substitutions can produce antagonists with increased GH releasing inhibitory potencies and GHRH receptor-binding affinities in vitro. The review of experimental results of these substances are promising altrough no clinical data are yet available. Finally, the advent of these antagonists has allowed significant progress in the understanding of the role of the central and tissue GHRH-GH-IGFs system in the pathogenesis of tumors.

Leptin and the pituitary.

Although leptin was originally viewed as an antiobesity hormone, it is now evident that it may have more pleiotropic actions. Experiments in rodents have shown that leptin activates the sympathetic nervous system, is involved in regulation of blood pressure, hematopoiesis, immune function, angiogenesis and brain, bone and pituitary development. Some biological effects expected based on observations in rodents, have so far not been seen in humans. Thus due to species differences in the role of leptin it is difficult to translate the data from rodents to human physiology. Hypothalamus is the primary brain site targeted by circulating leptin, secreted by fat cells. Leptin receptor has homology to members of class I cytokine receptor family, which may imply similarities in molecular events engaged by cytokines and leptin. In view of its cytokine-like properties it is likely that leptin produced and secreted outside of fat tissue i.e. in other tissues (CNS, pituitary, ovary, placenta, etc), is a paracrine regulator. Leptin receptor isoforms, long-signaling and short-nonsignaling, have been recently localized in human pituitaries. This opens the possibility of a direct action of leptin on the pituitary. However this appears to be quite complex and is species dependent. Leptin can be synthesized by normal and tumorous pituitary cells. Leptin protein expression in pituitary adenomas is decreased compared to that in normal pituitaries. Colocalization studies with leptin and anterior pituitary cells showed that 70% of ACTH cells are positive for leptin, 21% of GH cells, 29% of LH cells, 33% of FSH cells, 32% of TSH cells, 64% folliculo-stellate cells whereas very few PRL cells were positive (3%). Leptin is stored in secretory granules and secretory cells retain leptin in granules until stimulated. This follows a different secretory pathway than in adipocytes where upon synthesis leptin is immediately released. Question to be raised is does the pituitary contribute to the body leptin pool or is its action predominantly paracrine/autocrine? Clinically based evidence from studies performed in patients harboring different functional pituitary tumors causing a state of hormonal hypersecretion (acromegaly, prolactinomas, Cushing's disease) or hypopituitarism (due to non-functioning pituitary adenomas), are in favor of a paracrine/autocrine role of the pituitary leptin. Most of the studies have shown that the link between leptin, body composition and hormones of the pituitary is indirect. Thus changes in levels of circulating leptin are most likely due to changes in the metabolic and hormonal milieu during the chronic course of the disease or chronic treatment. Furthermore, circadian rhythm of leptin, its pulsatility and gender difference are preserved in hypopituitarism as well as in patients with functional pituitary adenomas implying that intact hypothalamic-pituitary function is not essential for leptin's circadian rhythm.

Hypothalamic dysfunction in "cured" acromegaly is treatment modality dependent.

The current definition of cure after treatment for acromegaly stipulates a reduction in GH levels to less than 2 ng/mL (< 5 mU/L), as such GH concentrations are believed to be associated with normalization of long term survival. We sought to further define the nature of the cure in such patients, when cure has been achieved by alternative therapeutic modalities, in the expectation that hypothalamic neuroregulatory control of GH secretion might be affected differently by radiotherapy or surgery. In particular we wished to determine the effect of therapy modality on endogenous somatostatin (SMS) tone, using the GH response to i.v. arginine as a paradigm. We studied 20 patients with cured acromegaly (mean 24-h GH concentration, < 2 ng/mL). Eight patients had been cured by surgery only (S; 4 women and 4 men; mean +/- SEM age, 52 +/- 5 yr), and 12 patients had been cured by radiotherapy (R; 4 women and 8 men; age, 52 +/- 3 yr). Sixteen healthy subjects were studied as a control group (C; 6 women and 10 men; age 53 +/- 3]. The median (range) GH during 24-h profiles was similar in each group: S, 1.3 (0.7-1.8) ng/mL; R, 0.6 (0.4-1.8) ng/mL; and C, 0.7 (0.4-3.2) ng/mL (P = 0.57). The median incremental GH responses to arginine were significantly lower in the R group compared with those in the S and C groups: S, 6.4 (2.1-16.6) ng/mL; R, 0.1 (0-1.7) ng/mL; and C, 9.2 (0-16.1) ng/mL (P = 0.0002; S vs. R, P < 0.01; S vs. C, P > 0.05; R vs. C, P < 0.001). We conclude that in acromegalic patients deemed to be cured (GH, < 2 ng/mL), the mode of therapy has considerable influence on the remaining hypothalamic-somatotroph function. In view of the putative mechanism by which arginine releases GH, we suggest that radiotherapy leads to a reduction or complete loss of endogenous SMS tone. This may have implications for the treatment of those acromegalic patients who are not cured (GH, > 2 ng/mL) and who require SMS analog therapy.

Intrahypothalamic growth hormone feedback: from dwarfism to acromegaly in the rat.

Two different dwarf rat models with primary (dw/dw, DW) or secondary (transgenic growth retarded, WF/Tgr) GH deficiency and contrasting hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SRIH) expression were implanted sc with GC cells. These form encapsulated rat GH-secreting tumors that maintain high plasma rat GH levels for several weeks. In both strains, GC cell tumors stimulated growth and raised GHBP levels, without affecting pituitary GH content. In DW rats, GC cell implants increased SRIH expression in the periventricular nucleus (PeV), but not in the arcuate nucleus (ARC), whereas their high GHRH expression in ARC was decreased by GC cells. In contrast, GC cell implants in WF/Tgr rats had little effect on the already high SRIH expression in PeV or low GHRH expression in ARC, although they reduced SRIH expression in ARC. GC cell implants also reduced GH receptor expression in both ARC and PeV in the WF/Tgr dwarves. Thus, chronic GH overexposure stimulates rapid growth in both dwarf strains, but has differential hypothalamic effects in these models. This experimental approach now makes it possible to study the effects of pathophysiological concentrations of GH ranging from dwarfism to acromegaly in the same animal model.

Growth hormone response to the hypothalamic somatostatinergic activity in acromegalic patients.

Oral glucose administration suppresses the TRH-induced TSH response by enhancing the hypothalamic somatostatinergic activity (HSA). We assessed the HSA in 13 acromegalic patients by measuring glucose-induced suppression of TRH-stimulated TSH secretion. The HSA showed wide variation with up to 64% suppression. The mean HSA of the patients (25 +/- 6%) did not differ from that in normal young men (19 +/- 4%) in our previous study. Six patients had normal or low HSA, and the other 7 patients had high HSA. The mean TRH-stimulated TSH levels of the patients with normal or low HSA was significantly lower than that of the patients with high HSA (5.13 +/- 0.10 vs. 11.30 +/- 2.80 mU/L). The HSA did not relate to sex, age, tumor size, basal GH levels, the paradoxical responses to TRH and GnRH, octreotide response, or the gsp oncogene. In the combined glucose-TRH test, glucose pretreatment completely suppressed the paradoxical increase in GH level at 30 min in 4 patients. However, it could suppress the paradoxical GH response by only 6-51% in the other 5 patients who also showed the paradoxical response in TRH test. The tumor diameter of patients with good response to the HSA was significantly larger than that of the patients with poor response (31 +/- 5 vs. 14 +/- 2 mm) as was the tumor grade (3.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2). This study supports the idea that a reduction of HSA is not a primary cause of acromegaly, and the HSA seems to increase to suppress the autonomous secretion of GH from the pituitary adenomas. HSA as well as the response of tumors to HSA do not determine tumor growth.

Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients: long-term treatment.

We have evaluated the long term effects and safety of Sandostatin LAR, a long acting formulation of octreotide, during 18 subsequent injections given every fourth week to 14 octreotide-sensitive acromegalic patients. The dosages (20, 30, or 40 mg) were adjusted according to GH response, side-effects, or symptom relief and assessed on day 28 after each injection. We found a stable and consistent suppression of GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) during the entire study period. Daily mean GH levels were suppressed below 2 micrograms/L in 9, to between 2-5 micrograms/L in 3, and to between 5-10 micrograms/L in 2 patients. The corresponding IGF-I values were suppressed to below 500 micrograms/L in 9 patients and to between 500-1000 micrograms/L in the remaining 5 patients. Increasing the dosage of Sandostatin LAR from 20 to 30 mg had no obvious additional effect on GH suppression, but provided a further decrease in IGF-I levels. Forty milligrams of the drug had no additional effect on GH or IGF-I compared to 30 mg. Acromegalic signs and symptoms improved during treatment. Although the fluctuations of daily mean octreotide levels were high, dosage increments caused an increase in the average serum concentration in the individual patient. Pituitary tumor size reduction was seen in all previously untreated patients (n = 4). We found only minor changes in glucose metabolism (oral glucose tolerance test and hemoglobin A1C) during treatment, but no biologically relevant changes in thyroid function (TSH, T3, and free T4). One patient developed asymptomatic gallstones, and another acquired vitamin B12 deficiency during treatment. The drug is well tolerated during long term treatment. Sandostatin LAR may well be the future medical treatment of choice for acromegalic patients.

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in active acromegaly after the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and GH-releasing peptide-6.

His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2 (called GHRP-6) is a synthetic compound that releases GH in a dose-related, specific, and nonspecies-specific manner, through mechanisms different from those of GHRH. Being, normally, more potent than GHRH, GHRP-6 shows a striking synergistic action when administered simultaneously with GHRH, although the mechanisms and point of action of such a potentiating effect are unknown. The aim of the present study was 2-fold: 1) to further characterize the actions and mechanisms of GHRP-6 as well as its synergistic effects, and 2) to study its actions in acromegalic patients. Eleven acromegalic patients and 12 normal subjects, age and sex matched as controls, underwent 3 tests each on separate occasions, being challenged with GHRH (100 micrograms, iv), GHRP-6 (90 micrograms, iv), or GHRH plus GHRP-6. GH was analyzed as the area under the curve (mean +/- SE; micrograms per L/120 min). In normal subjects, GH secretion was 686 +/- 227 after GHRH, 1787 +/- 510 after GHRP-6, and 4111 +/- 671 after GHRH plus GHRP-6; the level of GH secreted after GHRH plus GHRP-6 treatment was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the arithmetic sum of GH levels after both compounds administered separately. In acromegalic patients, the level of GH secreted after GHRH was 1468 +/- 499, that after GHRP-6 was 2595 +/- 762, and that after GHRH plus GHRP-6 was 4949 +/- 1043; this last value was not significantly different from the arithmetical addition of levels produced by both compounds administered separately. These results indicate that GH-secreting pituitary adenomas respond surprisingly well to either GHRH or GHRP-6 despite being deprived for long periods (even years) of the physiological regulation exerted by the hypothalamus. In addition, the synergistic action of GHRH plus GHRP-6 was observed in normal subjects, but not in acromegalic patients. These results suggest that GHRP-6 does not need to operate through hypothalamic factors to exert its GH-releasing action, even for eliciting a greater response than GHRH. On the other hand, the synergistic effect of GHRH plus GHRP-6 appears to need the cooperation of the hypothalamus, but how this occurs is still undetermined.

The evaluation of hypothalamic somatostatin tone using pyridostigmine and thyrotropin releasing hormone in patients with acromegaly.

To indirectly evaluate the hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) tone in patients with acromegaly, the effects of pyridostigmine (PD), a cholinesterase inhibitor which can inhibit hypothalamic SS secretion, on TRH-induced TSH secretion and the effects of SMS 201-995 on TSH or GH secretion were studied in acromegalic patients (31-69 yr, n = 10), normal young (21-24 yr, n = 7) and normal old male subjects (62-71 yr, n = 7). After pretreatment with PD (60 mg po, -30 min), normal young subjects showed significantly enhanced TSH responses to TRH (500 micrograms i.v., 0 min) compared to single administration of TRH, whereas normal old and acromegalic patients did not show such enhancement. Plasma TSH response to a single administration of TRH in acromegalic patients was significantly lower than that of normal young and old subjects. Although normal young and old subjects showed significantly enhanced GH responses to GHRH (100 micrograms i.v. at 0 min) after the pretreatment with PD (60 mg, -30 min), no such enhancement was observed in acromegalic patients. In contrast, the decrement in plasma TSH after SMS 201-995 administration was similar between normal subjects (5 young 5 old) and 7 acromegalic patients. Further, the maximal plasma GH decrement after administration was significantly greater in acromegalic patients than in the 5 normal young and 5 old subjects p < 0.01). In conclusion, hypothalamic SS tone does not appear to be elevated in acromegalic patients compared to normal young and probably old subjects.

Effect of chronic octreotide treatment on intestinal absorption in patients with acromegaly.

The adverse gastrointestinal effects of octreotide, a synthetic analog of somatostatin, have not been fully elucidated. Low-dose octreotide frequently causes adverse gastrointestinal symptoms in normal individuals. We investigated the adverse gastrointestinal effects of high-dose octreotide, which is required for the normalization of growth hormone hypersecretion in some patients with acromegaly. Patients with acromegaly (N = 8) were treated with octreotide, 450 micrograms/day, then 1500 micrograms/day for two months at each dosage. Carbohydrate absorption was assessed using the D-xylose test, and fat absorption using fecal fat excretion and serum carotene concentrations, at baseline, at each dosage of octreotide, and after one month of washout. Ultrasonography was used to monitor for cholelithiasis. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations were significantly suppressed at both dosages. Adverse gastrointestinal symptoms were mild and transient. D-Xylose absorption remained normal at each dosage and after one month of washout. Fecal fat excretion increased from 7 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 2 g/24 hr (P < 0.05) after the higher dosage and resumed baseline levels after the washout. Mean fasting serum carotene levels remained normal, and carotene loading test (15,000 units three times a day for three days) was unreliable in identifying patients with high fecal fat. No new cholelithiasis was detected by ultrasonography. One of two patients with preexisting cholelithiasis developed biliary colic several days after the treatment period. Although steatorrhea was common, small intestinal absorptive capacity was otherwise unchanged by four months of high-dose octreotide treatment, which significantly suppressed growth hormone secretion in acromegalic patients.

Serum thyrotropin response to combined arginine and thyrotropin-releasing hormone administration provides evidence for an altered somatostatinergic tone in acromegaly.

The aim of this study was to evaluate plasma thyrotropin (TSH), prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) responses to the TSH-releasing hormone (TRH) test and to a combined arginine-TRH test (ATT-TRH) in 10 normal subjects and in 15 acromegalic patients. In controls, TSH responsiveness to TRH was enhanced by ATT (p less than 0.001). When considering the 15 acromegalic patients as a whole, no significant difference in TSH responses was detected during the two tests. However, patients without suppression of plasma GH levels after oral glucose load showed an increased TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test if compared to TRH alone (p less than 0.025), while patients with partial suppression of plasma GH levels after glucose ingestion showed a decreased TSH responsiveness to ATT-TRH (p less than 0.05). No difference was recorded in PRL and GH responses, evaluated as area under the curve, during TRH or ATT-TRH tests in controls and in acromegalics. In conclusion, (1) normal subjects have an enhanced TSH response to the ATT-TRH test and (2) acromegalic patients without suppression of GH levels after oral glucose load show a TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test similar to that of controls, while acromegalics with partial GH suppression after oral glucose load have a decreased TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test. These data suggest that acromegaly is a heterogeneous disease as far as the somatostatinergic tone is concerned.

Extrapituitary acromegaly.

Acromegaly may result from ectopic production of the hypothalamic peptide, growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), or growth hormone (GH) itself. Hypothalamic, carcinoid, and pancreatic tumors account for most of these cases. The pathogenesis, etiology, and diagnosis of acromegaly caused by these nonpituitary tumors is discussed, and an approach to their management is provided.

[The relationship between TSH response to TRH and GH response to dopaminergic agents in patients with acromegaly].

The role of dopaminergic agents (DA) in the regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion was investigated in patients with untreated acromegaly. TRH (0.5 mg iv), bromocriptine (Br) (2.5 mg orally) or L-Dopa (500 mg orally) loading tests were performed, and serum levels of TSH, GH and prolactin (PRL) were measured. Patients were defined as responders to TRH when peak TSH level after TRH test was higher than 5 microU/ml. Br or L-Dopa was considered to be effective when serum GH or PRL levels were suppressed more than 50% of the basal value. The patients were classified into large adenoma group with suprasellar extension or cisternal herniation (L group, n = 7) and intrasellar small adenoma group (S group, n = 11) which was further divided into TRH responder (Sr group, n = 4) and TRH non-responder with suppressed TSH (Ss group, n = 7). Br was effective in 7 or 100% of 7 patients in the Ss group but only in one or 25% of 4 patients in the Sr group. Br was also effective in 5 or 71% of 7 patients in the L group, although most of them were responders to TRH. Percent inhibition of serum GH levels by Br was significantly higher in the Ss group (82.3 +/- 12.3%, p less than 0.001) and in the L group (64.7 +/- 20.5%, p less than 0.05) compared with that in the Sr group (29.3 +/- 21.6%). Suppression of serum GH level by L-Dopa was also observed in the Ss group. In contrast to the difference in the response of GH, serum PRL level was equally suppressed by Br or L-Dopa in each group. Suppression of TSH by administration of exogenous T4 had no effect on the GH suppression effect of Br in the Sr group. Considering the dual effects of DA to enhance growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in the hypothalamus and to suppress GH secretion in the pituitary gland, these findings suggest that the paradoxical effect of DA to suppress serum GH level is observed when the hypothalamo-pituitary axis is disturbed mechanically by large adenoma in the L group or functionally in the Ss group probably due to enhanced secretion of somatostatin which suppresses TSH secretion and impairs the effect of GHRH.

Placental and pituitary growth hormone secretion during pregnancy in acromegalic women.

It is now well established that during the second half of normal pregnancy, the human placenta secretes its specific GH variant (placental GH) in increasing amounts up to delivery. During the same period, pituitary GH secretion is progressively suppressed. The present study was aimed at clarifying the physiology of GH secretion in pregnant acromegalic women. Two young women remained acromegalic despite transphenoidal removal of their pituitary adenoma. Increased basal levels of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) as well as paradoxical GH release after TRH injection were noted. Both women became pregnant and delivered term babies without any complication. In both patients, pituitary GH remained elevated during the entire pregnancy, contrary to the situation in normal women. Paradoxical GH release after TRH treatment was also present, whereas no response was observed in five normal control subjects. GH pulsatility studies revealed a highly pulsatile secretory pattern of pituitary GH, in contrast to that in normal woman, whose placental GH is secreted tonically. Tissue placental GH concentrations were within the range of levels in normal placentas. An increase in serum IGF-I in late pregnancy was also similar to that observed in normal pregnancy. These findings confirm that increased IGF-I levels are not pituitary GH dependent in late pregnancy. They add new evidence that adenomatous somatotrophs lack an IGF-I-dependent feedback regulation present in normal somatotrophs.

Thyrotrophin-releasing hormone: a growth hormone-releasing factor.

The regulation of pituitary GH has traditionally been considered to be under dual hypothalamic control, by inhibitory and stimulatory releasing factors (SRIF and GRF respectively). The specificity of these factors is not absolute, however, and both SRIF and GRF have been implicated in the regulation of other pituitary hormones. Likewise, TRH not only regulates pituitary thyrotrophin but is also an acknowledged prolactin releasing factor. Since TRH also stimulates GH release throughout the vertebrates, it should also be considered as a GRF.

Circadian and pulsatile thyrotropin release in treated acromegalics.

We studied the 24-h TSH profiles of 16 treated male acromegalic patients (age range 26-68 yr) in clinical and biochemical remission. Eight had undergone transsphenoidal surgery, the others surgery and pituitary irradiation. Blood samples were taken at 20-min intervals; circadian rhythms were established by cosinor analysis, pulsatile release with the Cluster programme. All patients, except one irradiated subject, were euthyroid. TSH reserve was diminished preoperatively in 7 subjects and at the time of the profile study in 10 subjects, one of whom was biochemically hypothyroid. A significant circadian rhythm was present in 14 subjects and absent in the hypothyroid patient. The acrophase occurred at 2.46 +/- 0.51 h in nonirradiated patients and at 3.37 +/- 0.38 h in irradiated patients (NS). About 10 TSH pulses/24 h (range 6-13) were detected; there was no significant difference between irradiated and non-irradiated patients. With cross-correlation techniques synchronous release of TSH and PRL was demonstrated in 7 out of 8 nonirradiated patients in contrast to only 2 of the irradiated patients. This study demonstrates a qualitatively normal TSH secretion pattern for treated acromegalic patients, but the absolute TSH levels are clearly low compared with published data on normal subjects. The present findings can be explained by a diminished TSH cell mass; in addition radiation therapy causes a disturbance at the hypothalamic level, as indicated by the loss of synchronism between TSH and PRL release.

Effects of ingestion of glucose on GH and TSH secretion: evidence for stimulation of somatostatin release from the hypothalamus by acute hyperglycemia in normal man and its impairment in acromegalic patients.

Ingestion of glucose is known to induce suppression of GH secretion in normal subjects and this phenomenon is often absent in acromegalic patients. To clarify the mechanism of GH suppression in acute hyperglycemia in normal subjects and disturbed GH response in acromegalic patients, the effects of acute hyperglycemia on plasma GH and TSH levels were examined in normal subjects and acromegalic patients. Plasma GH levels were significantly lowered 45-60 min after ingestion of 75 g glucose and elevated at 210 and 240 min in nine normal subjects. Plasma TSH levels were also significantly lowered between 45 and 120 min after ingestion; levels then gradually rose. Subcutaneous administration of 50 micrograms SMS 201-995, a long acting somatostatin analog, lowered plasma TSH levels in both normal subjects and acromegalic patients, and there was no significant difference in the degree of decrease in plasma TSH levels between the normal subjects and patients. These results, taken together with several reports that somatostatin suppresses TSH secretion as well as GH secretion, suggest that acute hyperglycemia stimulates somatostatin release from the hypothalamus, thus causing inhibition of GH and TSH secretion. However, in ten acromegalic patients, only two showed suppression of plasma GH levels to below 50% of basal level and the degree of suppression of TSH secretion was significantly less than in normal subjects in the glucose tolerance test. It is, therefore, suggested that somatostatin release in response to acute hyperglycemia is impaired in most acromegalic patients and that this abnormality may be one of causes for the absence of the normal GH response to acute hyperglycemia in this disorder.

Multiple forms of immunoreactive growth hormone-releasing hormone in human plasma, hypothalamus, and tumor tissues.

We examined the nature of GHRH in plasma of normal subjects and patients with acromegaly, hypothalamic tissue, pheochromocytoma, and GHRH-producing pancreatic tumor tissue using two RIAs of different specificity. One assay was a N-terminal assay that recognized GHRH-(1-44)-NH2, GHRH-(1-40)-OH, and GHRH-(1-37)-OH equally, and the other was a C-terminal assay that recognized only the COOH-terminal amidated sequence of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. GHRH immunoreactivity was detectable in all samples in both assay systems, but the ratios of C- to N-terminal activity differed. The gel filtration profiles of plasma and tumor tissue revealed one peak in (or near) the position of synthetic GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. In contrast, two peaks were found in hypothalamic tissue; a major peak in the position of synthetic GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 and a higher mol wt peak. Ion exchange chromatography of the immunoreactive GHRH material from gel filtration of pooled plasma from normal subjects revealed three components of immunoreactive GHRH, one major peak in the position of GHRH-(1-40)-OH and two minor peaks in the positions of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 and GHRH-(1-37)-OH. Two components of immunoreactive GHRH, a major peak in the position of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 and a minor peak in the position of GHRH-(1-40)-OH, were found in hypothalamic tissue and pheochromocytomas. In the two ectopic GHRH-producing pancreatic tumors, three components of immunoreactive GHRH were detected: a major peak in the position of GHRH-(1-40)-OH, a smaller peak in the position of GHRH-(1-37)-OH, and a very small peak of GHRH-(1-44)-NH2. Synthetic GHRH-(1-44)-NH2 was not degraded by plasma during the extraction procedures. These results suggest that 1) the measured immunoreactive GHRH concentration differs when the same samples are measured by RIAs using antisera with different specificities; 2) such differences may be due to the presence of microheterogeneity of immunoreactive GHRH; 3) the microheterogeneity of immunoreactive GHRH in plasma is different from that in the hypothalamus; and 4) the posttranslational processing of GHRH in human hypothalamus is similar to that of pheochromocytomas but different from that of ectopic GHRH-producing pancreatic tumors.