Excellent Prognosis of Patients With Invasive Lung Adenocarcinomas During Surgery Misdiagnosed as Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia, Adenocarcinoma In Situ, or Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma by Frozen Section.

BACKGROUND: Our previous study revealed that intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis could differentiate invasive lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accurately from preinvasive lesions. However, few articles have analyzed the clinical impact of FS errors such as underestimation of invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs), and whether complementary therapy is needed remains controversial. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the prognosis of patients undergoing limited resection for invasive LUAD misdiagnosed as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) by intraoperative FS analysis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From 2012 through 2018, data on 3031 patients undergoing sublobar resection of AAH, AIS, or MIA diagnosed by FS analysis were collected. The concordance rate between FS analysis and final pathologic results was evaluated. To assess the clinical significance of a discrepancy between FS and final pathologic results, patients with final pathologic results of IAC were identified for prognostic evaluation. RESULTS: When AAH, AIS, and MIA were classified together as a group, the overall concordance rate between FS and final pathologic results was 93.7%, and 192 patients (6.3%) received an upgraded diagnosis from the final pathologic results. Misdiagnosed IACs consisted of 94 patients (48.9%) with lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma, 77 patients (40.1%) with acinar predominant adenocarcinoma, 19 patients (9.9%) with papillary predominant adenocarcinoma, one patient with solid predominant adenocarcinoma, and one patient with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma. Among these patients, no positive N1 or N2 lymph node findings were observed. Moreover, the 5-year recurrence-free survival was still 100%, although the final pathologic results turned out to be IAC. INTERPRETATION: Patients undergoing limited resection of invasive LUAD misdiagnosed as AAH, AIS, or MIA by FS analysis showed excellent prognoses. Sublobar resection guided by FS diagnosis would be adequate for these underestimated cases of invasive LUAD.

Adenocarcinoma cervical: diagnóstico na atenção primária e secundária à saúde / Cervical adenocarcinoma: diagnosis in primary and secondary health care

O adenocarcinoma cervical é uma patologia grave cuja incidência tem aumentado, principalmente em pacientes jovens. Um diagnóstico oportuno, na assistência primária e secundária à saúde, com métodos convencionais, melhora sobremaneira o prognóstico da paciente, a um custo tolerável para países em desenvolvimento.(AU)

The cervical adenocarcinoma is a serious pathology whose incident has increased mainly in young patients. One opportunistic diagnosis, in primary and secondary health care, with conventional methods, greatly improves the prognosis of the patients, at a cost tolerable to developing countries.(AU)

Use of Smartphones as Adjuvant Tools for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Settings.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of smartphone digital images for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) as an adjunct to a conventional visual inspection approach with acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI), in comparison with detection by histopathologic examination. METHODS: Three hundred women were primarily screened for human papillomavirus (HPV) using self-collected vaginal specimens. Human papillomavirus-positive women were then invited for VIA and VILI, which were interpreted as (i) nonpathological, (ii) pathological or, (iii) inconclusive. Cervical smearing, endocervical brushing, and cervical biopsies were performed. Digital images of the cervix were taken with a smartphone and evaluated offsite by experienced health care providers. Sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ were compared between on-site and off-site observers, using histopathological diagnosis as the criterion standard. RESULTS: Eighty-eight HPV-positive women were screened for cervical cancer. Overall, 7 cases of CIN2+ (8.0%) were diagnosed using biopsy specimens. The on-site physician obtained a sensitivity of 28.6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-71) and a specificity of 87.2% (95% CI, 77.7- 93.7). The off-site physicians obtained a sensitivity ranging between 42.9% (95% CI, 9.9-81.6; p = 1) and 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1-99.6; p = .13) and a specificity between 48.1% (95% CI, 36.5- 59.7; p < .001) and 79.2% (95% CI, 68.5-87.6; p = .10). Comparison between observers did not reach significance. Observers assessed 95.6% of all images as very good or acceptable for interpretation purpose. CONCLUSION: Smartphone images may be a useful adjunct to conventional VIA and VILI for the detection of CIN2+ and improve cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings.