RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening in the 27th week of pregnancy in Rhc-negative women, on detection of alloimmunisation, undetected at first trimester screening ('late' alloimmunisation), and subsequent haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), to assess risk factors for late alloimmunisation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort and nested case-control study. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: Two-year nationwide cohort. METHODS: Prospective inclusion of Rhc-negative women with negative first trimester screening and of screen-negative controls. Assessment of incidence and numbers needed to screen (NNS) of late alloimmunisation and HDFN; logistic regression analysis to establish risk factors for late alloimmunisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Late alloimmunisation, HDFN. RESULTS: Late alloimmunisation occurred in 99 of 62 096 (0.159%) Rhc-negative women; 90% had c/E antibodies and 10% non-Rhesus antibodies. Severe HDFN (fetal/neonatal transfusion) occurred in two of 62 096 (0.003%) of Rhc-negative women and 2% of late alloimmunisations; moderate HDFN (phototherapy) occurred in 20 children [22.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 13.8-31.1%]. Perinatal survival was 100%. The NNS to detect one HDFN case was 2823 (31 048 for severe, 3105 for moderate HDFN). Significant risk factors were former blood transfusion [odds ratio (OR), 10.4; 95% CI, 1.14-94.9], parity (P-1: OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 3.00-46.5; P > 1: OR, 7.77; 95% CI, 1.70-35.4) and amniocentesis/chorionic villus sampling during current pregnancy (OR, 9.20; 95% CI, 1.16-72.9). CONCLUSIONS: Additional screening of Rhc-negative women improved the detection of late alloimmunisation and HDFN, facilitating timely treatment, with a NNS of 2823. Independent risk factors for late alloimmunisation were blood transfusion, parity and chorionic villus sampling/amniocentesis in the current pregnancy. The occurrence of most factors before the current pregnancy suggests a secondary immune response explaining most late alloimmunisations. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Third trimester screening for alloimmunisation in Rhc-neg women improves detection and treatment of severe HDFN.
Asunto(s)
Eritroblastosis Fetal/sangre , Eritroblastosis Fetal/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Isoinmunización Rh/sangre , Isoinmunización Rh/epidemiología , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo Rh-Hr/inmunología , Amniocentesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica/estadística & datos numéricos , Eritroblastosis Fetal/diagnóstico , Eritroblastosis Fetal/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Paridad , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Isoinmunización Rh/diagnóstico , Isoinmunización Rh/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In 2008, the Prenatal Screening Program was introduced by the National Health Insurance in the Pomeranian region of Poland. As of then, biochemical and ultrasound screening was offered to women eligible for amniocentesis according to the earlier policy. The aim of the study was to investigate the evolution of the indications for amniocentesis after the introduction of the Program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 2579 women referred for amniocentesis to the Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdansk, were included in the study They were divided into two groups: 1705 women referred between 1996 and 2007 (group A) and 874 women referred between 2008 and 2010 (group B). Indications for amniocentesis were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A significant difference in the indications for amniocentesis was found between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test; p < 0.001). Maternal age, fetal malformation in the previous pregnancy and anxiety were less frequent in group B (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0156, respectively). In contrast, a higher frequency of positive biochemical screening and abnormal ultrasound results as indications for amniocentesis was found in group B (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the Prenatal Screening Program by the National Health Insurance shifted the proportion of indications for amniocentesis from maternal age to positive results in biochemical and ultrasound screenings, and increased the number of invasive testing. Further observation of the trend and its influence on the detection rate is imperative to confirm that the proposed Program is adequate and does not require adjustments.
Asunto(s)
Amniocentesis/métodos , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Amniocentesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Polonia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Given the complex array of emotional and medical issues that may arise when making a decision about amniocentesis, women may find that their spiritual and/or religious beliefs can comfort and assist their decision-making process. Prior research has suggested that Latinas' spiritual and/or religious beliefs directly influence their amniocentesis decision. A more intimate look into whether Latinas utilize their beliefs during amniocentesis decision-making may provide an opportunity to better understand their experience. The overall goal of this study was to describe the role structured religion and spirituality plays in Latinas' daily lives and to evaluate how religiosity and spirituality influences health care decisions, specifically in prenatal diagnosis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eleven women who were invited to describe their religious beliefs and thoughts while considering the option of amniocentesis. All participants acknowledged the influence of religious and/or spiritual beliefs in their everyday lives. Although the women sought comfort and found validation in their beliefs and in their faith in God's will during their amniocentesis decision-making process, results suggest the risk of procedure-related complications played more of a concrete role than their beliefs.