Oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy in breast cancer patients suffering from fatigue and musculoskeletal pain upon aromatase inhibitors treatment: a case-series study.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with breast cancer and positive hormone receptors, aromatase inhibitors are effective in reducing the risk of recurrences and are active in progressing the disease in this setting. On the other hand, fatigue and painful musculoskeletal side effects can significantly reduce treatment compliance. With no further treatment options to control these symptoms, non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as oxygen-ozone therapy, may play a role in managing rheumatologic symptomatology inasmuch. We have previously reported evidence on the effectiveness of oxygen-ozone in the treatment of pain and fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia patients and in oncological patients as well. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we reported 6 cases of patients (mean age 64 yrs, all Caucasian females) with breast cancer upon treatment with anastrozole (Arimidex®), suffering from musculoskeletal pain, weakness and fatigue, and therefore treated with oxygen-ozone major autohemotherapy according to the Italian Scientific Society of Oxygen Ozone Therapy (SIOOT) protocol. Pain was measured with a 10-item Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and fatigue with a 7-item Fatigue Scoring Scale (FSS). RESULTS: A reduction of at least 66% of pain (from 9.43 ±0.54 SD to 2.36 ±1.32 SD, p<0.001) and 66.26% of fatigue were obtained for all the cases. Pain and fatigue disappeared within one month from ozone therapy, and a healthy painless state lasted for many months following the oxygen-ozone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The oxygen-ozone therapy is a sound opportunity for breast cancer patients to reduce anti-aromatase-induced pain, fatigue, and musculoskeletal symptoms.

[A real-world study of the effects of endocrine therapy on liver function in breast cancer].

Objective: To compare the effect of different endocrine therapy drugs on liver function in patients with early breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to include 4 318 patients with early breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy in Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2021. All the patients were female, aged (51.2±11.3) years (range: 20 to 87 years), including 1 182 patients in the anastrozole group, 592 patients in the letrozole group, 332 patients in the exemestane group, and 2 212 patients in the toremifene group. The mixed effect model was used to analyze and compare the liver function levels of patients at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months of medication, and 1 year after drug withdrawal among the three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane) and toremifene. Results: ALT and AST of the 4 groups were significantly higher than the baseline level at 6 months (all P<0.01), and there were no significant differences in total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and AST levels among all groups one year after drug withdrawal (P: 0.538, 0.718, 0.061, respectively). There was no significant difference in the effect of all groups on AST levels (F=2.474, P=0.061), and in the effect of three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) on ALT levels (anastrozole vs. letrozole, P=0.182; anastrozole vs. exemestane, P=0.535; letrozole vs. exemestane, P=0.862). Anastrozole and letrozole had significantly higher effects on ALT levels than toremifene (P<0.01, P=0.009). The proportion of abnormal liver function in each group increased significantly at 6 months compared with baseline, and then the proportion showed a decreasing trend over time. Conclusions: Three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) and toremifene can significantly increase the level of ALT and AST in patients with breast cancer, and the levels can gradually recover to the baseline after 1 year of drug withdrawal. The effect of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole) on ALT levels is greater than toremifene.

A real-world study of the effects of endocrine therapy on liver function in breast cancer / 中华外科杂志

Objective: To compare the effect of different endocrine therapy drugs on liver function in patients with early breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to include 4 318 patients with early breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy in Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2021. All the patients were female, aged (51.2±11.3) years (range: 20 to 87 years), including 1 182 patients in the anastrozole group, 592 patients in the letrozole group, 332 patients in the exemestane group, and 2 212 patients in the toremifene group. The mixed effect model was used to analyze and compare the liver function levels of patients at baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months of medication, and 1 year after drug withdrawal among the three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane) and toremifene. Results: ALT and AST of the 4 groups were significantly higher than the baseline level at 6 months (all P<0.01), and there were no significant differences in total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and AST levels among all groups one year after drug withdrawal (P: 0.538, 0.718, 0.061, respectively). There was no significant difference in the effect of all groups on AST levels (F=2.474, P=0.061), and in the effect of three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) on ALT levels (anastrozole vs. letrozole, P=0.182; anastrozole vs. exemestane, P=0.535; letrozole vs. exemestane, P=0.862). Anastrozole and letrozole had significantly higher effects on ALT levels than toremifene (P<0.01, P=0.009). The proportion of abnormal liver function in each group increased significantly at 6 months compared with baseline, and then the proportion showed a decreasing trend over time. Conclusions: Three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) and toremifene can significantly increase the level of ALT and AST in patients with breast cancer, and the levels can gradually recover to the baseline after 1 year of drug withdrawal. The effect of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole) on ALT levels is greater than toremifene.

Eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib más fulvestrant en mujeres posmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama metastásico RH-Positivo YyHER2-Negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica / Efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with HR-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, treatment-naïve or on a prior line of endocrine therapy for metastatic disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente dictamen preliminar expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib más fulvestrant, en comparación con exemestano o anastrozol, en mujeres posmenopáusicas con cáncer de mama metastásico, RH-positivo y HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica. El cáncer de mama es la primera causa de muerte por neoplasia maligna en mujeres en el mundo. En el 2019, en Perú se detectaron 4,743 casos nuevos de cáncer de mama en mujeres; causando cerca de 1,840 muertes en el mismo año. El cáncer de mama metastásico (CMM) es una condición incurable. Se estima que la mediana de sobrevida global en pacientes con CMM es de aproximadamente tres años y que la tasa de sobrevida global hasta los 5 años es de aproximadamente 27%. Los tipos de medicamentos que se usan para el CMM dependen del estado menopáusico de la paciente, del estado del receptor hormonal (RH) y del receptor 2 del factor de crecimiento epidérmico humano (HER2) del cáncer. En el contexto de EsSalud, las mujeres posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo, HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica, a menudo se tratan con un inhibidor de la aromatasa (anastrozol o exemestano). El IETSI-EsSalud recibió una solicitud de evaluación de ribociclib más fulvestrant como una alternativa terapéutica al uso de inhibidores de la aromatasa, argumentándose una potencial prolongación de la sobrevida global de los pacientes, junto con un perfil de seguridad aceptable. Al respecto, el IETSI-EsSalud consideró que existe la necesidad de terapias nuevas y efectivas para los pacientes con CMM que proporcionen mejoras en la sobrevida global del paciente, tengan perfiles de toxicidad más favorables y mejoren la calidad de vida. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de literatura con el objetivo de identificar evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib más fulvestrant, en comparación con exemestano o anastrozol, en mujeres posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo y HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica. Se utilizaron las bases de datos PubMed, Cochrane Library y LILACS, priorizándose la evidencia proveniente de ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados. Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de bases de datos pertenecientes a grupos que realizan ETS y GPC, incluyendo el Healthcare Improvement Scotland, el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), el Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG), además de la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA) y páginas web de sociedades especializadas en el manejo del cáncer de mama como National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) y American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en la página web del registro de ensayos clínicos administrado por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) e International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) (https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o cuyos resultados no hayan sido publicados para, de este modo, disminuir el riesgo de sesgo de publicación. RESULTADOS: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib más fulvestrant, en comparación con exemestano o anastrozol, en mujeres posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo y HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica. CONCLUSIONES: El presente dictamen preliminar tuvo como objetivo evaluar la mejor evidencia sobre la eficacia y seguridad sobre la eficacia y seguridad de ribociclib más fulvestrant, en comparación con anastrozol y exemestano, en mujeres posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo y HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica. La evidencia clave para evaluar el uso de ribociclib en combinación con fulvestrant en la población de interés proviene de MONALEESA-3, un ECA de fase III, doble ciego, controlado con placebo, de grupos paralelos. El estudio MONALEESA-3 tuvo la limitación de no responder directamente a la pregunta PICO de interés, ya que evaluó el uso de ribociclib más fulvestrant en comparación con fulvestrant solo, y no versus el comparador de interés del presente dictamen (anastrozol o exemestano). Cabe señalar que el uso de fulvestrant como monoterapia no está aprobado en EsSalud porque no se ha demostrado que sea diferente del exemestano, en términos de calidad de vida y eventos adversos en pacientes posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo y tratamiento endocrino previo, y no hay evidencia que permita generar conclusiones definitivas respecto a la sobrevida global (Dictamen Preliminar de Evaluación de Tecnología Sanitaria N.° 050-SDEPFyOTS-DETS-IETSI-2016). Los resultados de MONALESSA-3 no permiten determinar un beneficio neto con ribociclib más fulvestrant en comparación con fulvestrant más placebo por las siguientes razones: i) los resultados disponibles de SG son aún preliminares (corresponden a análisis interinos) y requieren de un mayor seguimiento (resultados del análisis final de SG) para determinar si realmente existe un beneficio en la prolongación de la vida de los pacientes, más aun en vista de una modesta reducción en el riesgo de mortalidad y una gran incertidumbre en las estimaciones reportadas (amplio intervalo de confianza, con valores cercanos al valor de la no diferencia), ii) los resultados muestran que ribociclib más fulvestrant no mejora la calidad de vida de los pacientes y, iii) los resultados muestran que ribociclib más fulvestrant aumenta significativamente el riesgo de EA serios y discontinuación debido a EA asociados a la medicación. Debido a la incertidumbre en la relación de riesgo-beneficio con ribociclib más fulvestrant, en comparación con anastrozol y/o exemestano, dada principalmente por la ausencia de evidencia que responda directamente a la pregunta PICO establecida en el presente dictamen, la aprobación de uso de ribociclib más fulvestrant no sería una decisión costo-oportuna; dada la disponibilidad de tratamientos efectivos, con perfiles de seguridad aceptables y menos costosos en la institución (anastrozol y exemestano), los cuales son recomendados en las GPC internacionales más recientes para la población de interés del presente dictamen. Por lo expuesto, el IETSI no aprueba el uso de ribociclib más fulvestrant en mujeres posmenopáusicas con CMM, RH-positivo y HER2-negativo, sin tratamiento previo o con una línea previa de terapia endocrina para enfermedad metastásica.

[A prospective study of bone loss in early stage postmenopausal breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors].

Objective: To investigate the occurrence and development of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) related bone loss in Chinese patients with postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer. Methods: Patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and (or) progesterone receptor(PR) positive postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer who received Letrozole, Anastrozole, or Exemestane as adjuvant therapy were enrolled. Before treatment, baseline bone mineral density (BMD), bone metabolism markers were examined and a lifestyle questionnaire was completed; BMD was examined annually during the treatment; Outpatient visits were conducted to record recurrent and fatal events. Results: From November 2013 to August 2016, 131 patients with breast cancer eligible for enrollment were enrolled. A total of 65 patients had normal baseline bone mass, and 68 patients had reduced bone mass. Letrozole was taken in 69 patients, anastrozole in 52 patients, and exemestane in 10 patients. With a median follow-up of 43.7 months, 100 patients could be evaluated for changes in bone mineral density. Bone mineral density of femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine L1 to 4 decreased year by year, and the decrease was the most significant in the first year, which decreased by 2.3%, 2.4%, and 3.9% respectively. Ten new cases of osteoporosis occurred in two years, eight of them occurred in the lumbar spine, all of whom had reduced bone mass at baseline. Among the 131 patients who completed the lifestyle questionnaire, the proportions of daily calcium supplementation and vitamin D were 28.2% and 7.6%, respectively; more than half (52.7%) of them lacked regular exercise. Conclusion: BMD was declining steadily in patients treated with AIs, especially in the first year. Lumbar spine is the most common osteoporosis site, early prevention and health education should be strengthened.

Representation of CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and UGT1A4 Polymorphisms within Croatian Breast Cancer Patients' Population.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes (DME) could have a critical role in individual responses to anastrozole. Frequency of CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3 and UGT1A4*2 SNPs in 126 Croatian breast cancer (BC) patients and possible association with anastrozole-induced undesirable side effects were analyzed. Eighty-two postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC treated with anastrozole and 44 postmenopausal ER-positive BC patients before hormonal adjuvant therapy were included in the study. Genomic DNA was genotyped by TaqMan Real-Time PCR. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The homozygotes for the variant G allele of CYP3A5*3 were predominant (88%), and the homozygotes for the reference A allele were not detected. While homozygotes for the variant G allele of CYP3A4*1B were not detected, predominantly wild type homozygotes for A allele (94%) were present. CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 SNPs were in 84.3% linkage disequilibrium (D' = 0.843) and 95.1% (D' = 0.951) in group treated with anastrozole and w/o treatment, respectively. Homozygotes for the A allele of UGT1A4*2 were not detected in our study groups. Although the variant CYP3A5*3 allele, which might result in poor metabolizer phenotype and more pronounced side effects, was predominant, significant association with BMD changes induced by anastrozole were not confirmed.

Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Practical Guide for the Primary Care Provider.

Several organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force, recommend incorporation of breast cancer risk-based counseling and chemoprevention into routine well-woman care. However, primary care providers report both discomfort with and a lack of medical knowledge on this topic. In this review we present a practical, evidence-based guide for incorporating breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention into routine care. We advocate a stepwise approach consisting of: (1) risk assessment and communication, (2) selection of appropriate chemoprevention based on risk-benefit analysis, (3) shared decision-making regarding chemoprevention, and (4) management of chemoprevention side effects. We encourage providers to identify high-risk women and refer them to genetic counseling or a high-risk breast cancer clinic. For women who are not considered high risk, we suggest using the Gail model to estimate a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer. Usually, the benefits of chemoprevention outweigh the risks of chemoprevention once a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer reaches 3%. For these women there are several factors that need to be considered when selecting a chemoprevention agent, including patient preference, thrombotic history, menopausal status, absence or presence of a uterus, and bone mineral density. We advocate an evidence-based shared decision-making approach that reflects the woman's individual preferences when communicating risk and counseling about chemoprevention. After starting a chemoprevention agent, close follow-up is important as side effects of chemoprevention are common, including vasomotor symptoms and arthralgias. We also review evidence-based management of chemoprevention side effects.

A meta-analysis of clinical benefit rates for fulvestrant 500 mg vs. alternative endocrine therapies for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader, is approved for first- and second-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive ABC, to evaluate differences in clinical benefit rate (CBR; proportion of patients experiencing best overall response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥ 24 weeks) between fulvestrant 500 mg and comparator endocrine therapies. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CBR were calculated; fixed effects (FE) models were constructed (first- and second-line data, alone and combined). RESULTS: Six RCTs were included. Four studies evaluated fulvestrant 500 mg vs. fulvestrant 250 mg; two evaluated fulvestrant 500 mg vs. anastrozole 1 mg. In total, 1054 and 534 patients were included (first- and second-line treatment, respectively). Analysis of OR and 95% CI of CBR by therapy line favored fulvestrant 500 mg vs. comparator therapy. Assessing all results combined in the FE model indicated significant improvement in CBR with fulvestrant 500 mg vs. comparator treatments (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.13-1.57; p = 0.001). Restricting the FE model to therapy line demonstrated significant improvement in CBR vs. comparator treatments (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.02-1.73; p = 0.035) for first-line, and a trend to improvement vs. comparator treatments (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.90-1.79; p = 0.174) for second-line. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive ABC, fulvestrant 500 mg first-line was associated with significantly greater CBR (more patients benefiting from treatment) vs. comparator endocrine therapy.

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome during aromatase inhibitors therapy: A case report and review of the literature.

RATIONALE: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a class of drugs widely used in the treatment of estrogen sensitive breast and ovarian cancer which convert testosterone to estradiol and androstenedione to estrogen. The AIs of third generation, including anastrazole, letrozole and exemestane, have actually become the standard of care of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in menopausal women and are recommended as adjuvant treatment after surgery in place of/or following tamoxifen. Their main side-effects include reduction in bone mineral density, occurrence of menopausal manifestations and development of musculoskeletal symptoms which are, usually, transient, but sometimes evolve into a typical form of arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recently, a pathogenic linkage with other autoimmunity diseases, such as Sjogren syndrome (SjS), anti-synthetase antibody syndrome (ASAS), systemic sclerosis (SS) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), was also described. PATIENT CONCERNS: Here, we report the first case of a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) developed during treatment with anastrazole. DIAGNOSIS: The patient developed a sudden onset of speech disturbance and disorientation, due to ischemic lesions, after 6 months of AIs therapy and the laboratory examination showed the positivity of anti-Cardiolipin antibodies, anti-ß2 Glycoprotein 1 antibodies and Lupus Anticoagulant, so a certain diagnosis of APS was achieved. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with warfarin associated to hydroxychloroquine and monthly cycles of low doses intravenous immunoglobulins. OUTCOMES: A good control of the disease was obtained despite the continuation of anastrazole; the patient's clinical and laboratory situation remained not modified after AIs withdrawal. LESSONS: We discussed the possible role of anastrazole treatment in inducing APS in our patient, reporting the available literature data about the association between AIs treatment and autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, we analyzed the mechanism of action of estrogens in the pathophysiology of autoimmune rheumatic disorders.

Assessment and management of bone health in women with early breast cancer receiving endocrine treatment in the DATA study.

The phase III DATA study investigates the efficacy of adjuvant anastrozole (6 vs. 3 year) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer previously treated with 2-3 years of tamoxifen. This planned side-study assessed patterns of care regarding detection and treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis, and trends in bone mineral density (BMD) during and after therapy. We registered all BMD measurements and bisphosphonate-use. Time to osteopenia/osteoporosis was analysed by Kaplan Meier methodology. For the trend in T-scores we used linear mixed models with random patients effects. Of 1860 eligible DATA patients, 910 (48.9%) had a baseline BMD measurement. Among patients with a normal baseline BMD (n = 417), osteopenia was observed in 53.5% and 55.4% in the 6- and 3-year group respectively (p = 0.18), during follow-up. Only two patients (3-year group) developed osteoporosis. Of the patients with osteopenia at baseline (n = 408), 24.4% and 20.4% developed osteoporosis respectively (p = 0.89). Three years after randomisation 18.3% and 18.2% used bisphosphonates in the 6- and 3-year groups respectively and 6 years after randomisation this was 23.7% and 20.9% respectively (p = 0.90) of which the majority used oral bisphosphonates. The yearly mean BMD-change during anastrozole in the lumbar spine showed a T-score decline of 0.075. After bisphosphonate addition the decline became less prominent (0.047 (p < 0.001)) and after anastrozole cessation, while continuing bisphosphonates, the mean BMD yearly increased (0.047 (p < 0.001)). In conclusion, extended anastrozole therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of osteoporosis. Anastrozole-use was associated with a BMD decrease; however, the decline was modest and partially reversible after anastrozole cessation.

Phase 2 placebo-controlled, single-blind trial to evaluate the impact of oral ibandronate on bone mineral density in osteopenic breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: 5-year results of the single-centre BONADIUV trial.

AIM: We present the final results of the BONADIUV trial, a single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study to evaluate the impact of ibandronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in osteopenic women taking aromatase inhibitors (AI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2014, 171 osteopenic patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either placebo or oral monthly ibandronate (150 mg). Treatment duration was 2 years, with 6-month evaluation. Primary end-point was the 2-year lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) T-score mean differences as measure of BMD variation. Secondary analyses of survival outcomes have been performed at a 5-year median follow-up. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02616744. RESULTS: Median age of study population was 60.2 years (range 44-75). At the database cut-off time, the median follow-up was 63.3 months (range 2.7-87.3). No difference in terms of T-score was shown at baseline between arms both for TH (P = 0.61) and LS (P = 0.96). At 2-year follow up, the mean change was statistically significant in favour of ibandronate arm both at TH (P = 0.0002) and LS (P < 0.0001). No significant difference in terms of adverse events was observed between arms. At a median follow-up of 63.3 months (range 2.7-87.3), the overall survival (OS) rate was 97.5% in the placebo group and 93.0% in the ibandronate arm (P = 0.19). The invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) rates did not differ between groups (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Ibandronate compared to placebo improved BMD change in osteopenic women treated with adjuvant AI. Five-year survival analyses showed no difference between arms in terms of OS and iDFS rates.

Bone health consequence of adjuvant Anastrozole in monotherapy or associated with biochanin-A in ovariectomized rat model.

AIMS: We investigate the consequence of adjuvant anastrozole (ANA) in monotherapy or associated with biochanin A (BCA) in ovariectomized (OVX) rat model and the degree of developing bone loss in both conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female rats were assigned to six groups. Five groups were bilaterally OVX, and one was sham operated. The five groups were; ANA group (0.5 mg/kg b.wt orally), BCA (5 mg/kg b.wt intraperitoneally (I/P), co-treated group (BCA + ANA), two control groups receiving even distilled water orally or DMSO I/P for twenty weeks. Bone turnover biomarkers BALP, OC, PTH, TRAP and TNFα were determined in serum. Bone mineral content, histological and morphometric measurements on rat femurs were performed. BMD by X-ray technique on tibias of rats and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of all treated and sham groups were applied. KEY FINDINGS: There was marked elevation in bone turnover biomarkers with high serum Ca and P content in the ANA-treated rats. Moreover marked elevation of TNFα, PTH, TC and TG, ANA caused severe changes in the BMD detected by X-ray in tibial bones and CT analysis of lumbar vertebrae of OVX rats. While I/P injection of BCA ameliorated the adverse bone health decrements caused by ANA. SIGNIFICANCE: The study highlights the importance of the BCA supplementation in accordance with the ANA therapy in case of ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis which is clinically presented in Postmenopausal women with breast cancer during which considerable risk of developing osteoporosis is predicted during treatment.

Aromatized Estrogens Amplify Nocturnal Growth Hormone Secretion in Testosterone-Replaced Older Hypogonadal Men.

Context: Testosterone (T) increases GH secretion in older men with a relative lack of T, in hypogonadal men of all ages, and in patients undergoing sex reassignment. The role of estradiol (E2) in men is less well defined. Objective: To assess the contribution of aromatization of T to spontaneous nocturnal and stimulated GH secretion. Participants: Four groups of healthy older men (N = 74, age range 57 to 77 years) were studied. The gonadotropic axis was clamped with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix. Three groups received T and one group placebo addback. Two T-replaced groups were treated with anastrozole (an aromatase inhibitor) and either placebo or E2 addback. Main Outcome Measures: Ten-minute GH concentration profiles were quantified by deconvolution analysis, after overnight (2200 to 0800 hours) sampling, and after combined IV injection of GHRH (0.3 µg/kg) and GHRH-2 (0.3 µg/kg) and withdrawal of a 2-hour somatostatin infusion (1 µg/kg/h). Results: E2 addback during aromatase inhibition increased basal (P = 0.046), pulsatile (P = 0.020), and total (P = 0.018) GH secretion by 60% to 70%. E2 did not potentiate GH secretory stimuli. Logarithmically transformed pulsatile GH secretion correlated strongly and positively with concurrent E2 concentrations overall (P = 0.028) and under anastrozole treatment (P = 0.005). Conclusion: E2 administration in older men transdermally stimulates overnight pulsatile GH secretion. The exact site of E2 action cannot be ascertained from these experiments but may include hypothalamic loci involved in GH regulation, especially because GH secretagogue effects on somatotrope pituitary cells were not affected.

Vitamin D Levels, Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms, and Inflammatory Cytokines in Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Arthralgias: An Analysis of CCTG MA.27.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of women taking aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy develop AI-induced arthralgia (AIA), and many might discontinue AI therapy because of the pain. Using plasma samples from the MA.27 study, we assessed several factors potentially associated with AIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MA.27 is a phase III adjuvant trial comparing 2 AIs, exemestane versus anastrozole. Within an 893-participant nested case-control AIA genome-wide association study, we nested a 72 AIA case-144 control assessment of vitamin D plasma concentrations, corrected for seasonal and geographic variation. We also examined 9 baseline inflammatory cytokines: interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon (IFN)γ, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17, IL-23, and chemokine ligand (CCL)-20. Finally, we analyzed the multivariate effects of baseline factors: vitamin D level, previously identified musculoskeletal single nucleotide polymorphisms, age, body mass index, and vitamin D receptor (VDR) Fok-I variant genotype on AIA development. RESULTS: Changes in vitamin D from baseline to 6 months were not significantly different between cases and controls. Elevated inflammatory cytokine levels were not associated with development of AIA. The multivariate model included no clinical factors associated with AIA. However, women with the VDR Fok-I variant genotype were more likely to have a lower IL-1ß level (P = .0091) and less likely to develop AIA after 6 months of AI compared with those with the wild type VDR (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In this nested case-control correlative study, vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with development of AIA; however, patients with the Fok-I VDR variant genotype were more likely to have a significant reduction in IL-1ß level, and less likely to develop AIA.

ADJUVANT (HORMONAL) THERAPY AS A CAUSE OF BONE LOSS IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER (REVIEW OF LITERATURE).

Adjuvant (hormonal) therapy is the main method of treatment after surgery in hormone (estrogen and/or progesterone) positive breast cancer patients. The goal of above mentioned treatment is to reduce or block the level of estrogen and progesterone. ultiple clinical trials have revealed that hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients affect bone mineral density (BMD). Authors have analyzed data obtained from several clinical trials conducted in several countries (including Georgia). The final conclusion is that selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have negative effect on BMD in pre-menopausal women and aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane) are associated with significant bone loss in post-menopausal women. It is recommended to assess BMD during the adjuvant (hormonal) therapy using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Because of significant negative impact of aromatase inhibitors on BMD, it is suggested to involve antiresorbtive treatment in parallel with hormonal therapy.

Fulvestrant for hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD), which by blocking proliferation of breast cancer cells, is an effective endocrine treatment for women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. The goal of such systemic therapy in this setting is to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, and increase survival time. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant for hormone-sensitive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women, as compared to other standard endocrine agents. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 7 July 2015. We also searched major conference proceedings (American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium) and practice guidelines from major oncology groups (ASCO, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and Cancer Care Ontario). We handsearched reference lists from relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included for analyses randomised controlled trials that enrolled postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer (TNM classifications: stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC) or metastatic breast cancer (TNM classification: stage IV) with an intervention group treated with fulvestrant with or without other standard anticancer therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from trials identified in the searches, conducted 'Risk of bias' assessments of the included studies, and assessed the overall quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Outcome data extracted from these trials for our analyses and review included progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP) or time to treatment failure, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, toxicity, and quality of life. We used the fixed-effect model for meta-analysis where possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine studies randomising 4514 women for meta-analysis and review. Overall results for the primary endpoint of PFS indicated that women receiving fulvestrant did at least as well as the control groups (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.02; P = 0.18, I2= 56%, 4258 women, 9 studies, high-quality evidence). In the one high-quality study that tested fulvestrant at the currently approved and now standard dose of 500 mg against anastrozole, women treated with fulvestrant 500 mg did better than anastrozole, with a HR for TTP of 0.66 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.93; 205 women) and a HR for overall survival of 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.98; 205 women). There was no difference in PFS whether fulvestrant was used in combination with another endocrine therapy or in the first- or second-line setting, when compared to control treatments: for monotherapy HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.04) versus HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.99) for combination therapy when compared to control, and HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.03) in the first-line setting and HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.04) in the second-line setting.Overall, there was no difference between fulvestrant and control treatments in clinical benefit rate (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.10; P = 0.29, I2 = 24%, 4105 women, 9 studies, high-quality evidence) or overall survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09, P = 0.62, I2 = 66%, 2480 women, 5 studies, high-quality evidence). There was no significant difference in vasomotor toxicity (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.18, 3544 women, 8 studies, high-quality evidence), arthralgia (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.09, 3244 women, 7 studies, high-quality evidence), and gynaecological toxicities (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.57, 2848 women, 6 studies, high-quality evidence). Four studies reported quality of life, none of which reported a difference between the fulvestrant and control arms, though specific data were not presented. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer, fulvestrant is at least as effective and safe as the comparator endocrine therapies in the included studies. However, fulvestrant may be potentially more effective than current therapies when given at 500 mg, though this higher dosage was used in only one of the nine studies included in the review. We saw no advantage with combination therapy, and fulvestrant was equally as effective as control therapies in both the first- and second-line setting. Our review demonstrates that fulvestrant is a safe and effective systemic therapy and can be considered as a valid option in the sequence of treatments for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer.

Mechanism of Bushen Jianpi decoction in preventing and treating osteoporosis caused by aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Research on the mechanism of Bushen Jianpi decoction (BJD) for preventing and treating osteoporosis caused by aromatase inhibitors (AI) during treatment for breast cancer resection. METHODS: An ovariectomized mouse model was established using random division into 6 groups: a sham ovariectomized group, a blank control group, a control group, an alendronate group, a BJD group, and a drug combination group. Mice breast cancer cell lines (4T1) were cultured and seeded into the armpits of 6 groups of BALB/c mice. The mouse breast cancer postoperative model was built when resecting the tumor after 3 weeks following seeding tumor. After 1 weeks, the 6 groups of mice were given different drugs. Then the following analyses were made: estradiol (E2) levels and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in the serum; detection of in vitro bone density and calcium and bone phosphorus content; tumor pathology and immunohistochemistry detection. RESULTS: The results suggested that BJD decreased levels of ALP in ovariectomized mice, and there was a trend for improved bone loss. BJD strengthened the trend of alendronate to improve bone loss, improved bone density, bone calcium and phosphorous, and reduced ALP. BJD had a certain role on the promotion of the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) in the relapse of the tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with BJD and alendronate can act synergistically against osteoporosis, which was possibly related to a reduced bone conversion rate through inhibiting bone resorption. BJD may block the MAPK signal pathway in breast cancer cells, increasing the expression of ERs and making cancer cells sensitive to endocrine treatment.

Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Overall Survival for Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Alternative Therapies for Treatment of Postmenopausal, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Following Failure on Prior Endocrine Therapy.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a review of randomized trials to compare the overall survival (OS) with fulvestrant 500 mg versus alternative treatment for estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer following endocrine therapy failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained by modeling OS data with the Weibull distribution. A fixed-effect Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. The evidence network included anastrozole 1 mg, letrozole 2.5 mg, fulvestrant 250 mg, exemestane 25 mg, megestrol acetate 40 mg, and everolimus 10 mg plus exemestane 25 mg as comparators. Post-antiestrogen and post-aromatase inhibitor subgroup networks were analyzed. RESULTS: In the overall analysis, the HRs suggested improved OS for fulvestrant 500 mg versus fulvestrant 250 mg and megestrol acetate 40 mg, and numerically favorable differences with fulvestrant 500 mg versus other comparators. In the antiestrogen subgroup, the HRs suggested improved OS for fulvestrant 500 mg versus fulvestrant 250 mg and megestrol acetate 40 mg; numerical differences in the HRs were seen versus anastrozole 1 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg. In the aromatase inhibitor subgroup, the HRs for OS numerically favored fulvestrant 500 mg versus fulvestrant 250 mg and exemestane 25 mg. CONCLUSION: Acknowledging the limitations of the present network meta-analysis, these findings suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg might provide improved OS versus fulvestrant 250 mg and megestrol acetate 40 mg for treatment of estrogen receptor-positive ABC following endocrine therapy failure. Although OS efficacy versus everolimus 10 mg plus exemestane 25 mg (for overall evidence network), anastrozole 1 mg, exemestane 25 mg, and letrozole 2.5 mg is numerically favorable, additional studies are required to draw formal conclusions.

Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761-mediated inhibition of aromatase for the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Ginkgo biloba has been used in herbal medicines for thousands of years. Although a standard G. biloba extract, EGb 761 has been used to improve cognition in breast cancer patients, its effects on breast cancer are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the antitumorigenic effects of EGb 761 using an in vitro cell model and an in vivo xenograft model. EGb 761 significantly inhibited aromatase activity in aromatase over-expressing MCF-7 cells (MCF-7 AROM). In addition, EGb 761 exposure reduced cytochrome p450 aromatase (CYP19) mRNA and protein expression; CYP19 promoter I.3 and PII expression particularly decreased. These inhibitory effects on aromatase were accompanied by reduced 17ß-estradiol levels in MCF-7 AROM cells. For elucidating antitumorigenic effects, MCF-7 AROM cells were implanted in BALB/c nude mice prior to oral EGb 761 treatment for 3 weeks. EGb 761 reduced the tumor size and significantly reduced tumor CYP19 mRNA expression. Taken together, our results indicated that EGb 761 inhibited aromatase and exerted antitumor effects on breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. These findings suggest that EGb761 may be a useful aromatase inhibitor for the treatment for estrogen-sensitive breast cancer.