The Potential Value of Paraspinal Nerve Block (PVB) in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Compared with General Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia.

Objective: To analyze the potential value of paraspinal nerve block (PVB) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to compare it with general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia. Methods: 120 patients undergoing PCNL surgery in Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 were selected and divided into PVB anesthesia group, general anesthesia group, and epidural anesthesia group according to different anesthesia methods, with 40 cases in each group. The anesthesia index (anesthesia operation time, anesthetic effect time, anesthesia time), the vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure), postoperative pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], stress response index (cortisol and noradrenaline), the incidence of adverse reactions (nausea and vomiting, lethargy, dizziness, skin itching, bradycardia) were compared among the three groups. Results: The operation time of the anesthesia in the PVB anesthesia group was 5.72±1.25, which was significantly lower than that in the the general (7.95±1.15) and epidural anesthesia groups(8.23±1.43), and the differences were statistically significant (P = .000). The time of onset of anesthesia in the PVB anesthesia group was 6.63±1.87, which was significantly lower than that in the the general (9.84±2.41) and epidural anesthesia groups(10.14±2.89), and the differences were statistically significant (P = .000).The heart rate during percutaneous puncture and intraoperative lithotripsy in the PVB anesthesia group was statistically lower than in the general and epidural anesthesia groups (P < .05). The mean arterial pressure 20 minutes after anesthesia and at the end of operation in the PVB anesthesia group was higher than that in the general anesthesia group, and the mean arterial pressure during percutaneous puncture and intraoperative lithotomy was lower than that in the general anesthesia group (P < .05). The VAS scores of the PVB anesthesia group at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the operation were lower than those of general and epidural anesthesia groups (P < .05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 5.00% (2/40) in the PVB anesthesia group and 35.00% (14/40) in the general anesthesia group, which was lower than that of 27.50% (11/40) in the epidural anesthesia group. (P < .05). Conclusion: The potential value of PVB in PCNL is high is better than that of general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia, anesthesia can shorten operation time and work time, extend the time of anesthesia to maintain, and be helpful to the intraoperative vital signs in patients with stable, mild postoperative pain and stress, low incidence of adverse reactions, efficacy and safety are good, can be introduced.

Local anesthesia, epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia comparison in lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis.

There were 3 major anesthesia methods for discectomy: local, epidural and general. A lot of studies has been established to compare these three methods in different aspects, however, the result is still controversial. We conducted this network meta-analysis to evaluate these methods. Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, were searched to identify clinical trials that reported the effects of local anesthesia general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia in lumbar disc herniation. Three indicators were included for evaluation: post-operative VAS score, complication, operation duration. In total, 12 studies and 2287 patients were included for this study. For complication, epidural anesthesia shows significantly lower rate compare to general anesthesia (OR: 0.45, 95% CI [0.24, 0.45], P=0.015), but local anesthesia didn't show significant result, no significant heterogeneity was observed between designs. For VAS score, epidural anesthesia showed a better effect (MD: -1.61, 95%CI [-2.24, -0.98]) compare to general anesthesia, and local anesthesia has a similar effect (MD: -0.91, 95%CI [-1.54, -0.27]). However this result showed a very high heterogeneity (I2=95%). For operation duration, local anesthesia showed a significant lesser time compare to general anesthesia (MD: -46.31(minutes), 95%CI [-73.73, -19.19]) but epidural anesthesia didn't have one, this result also showed a very high heterogeneity (I2=98%). Epidural anesthesia showed lesser post- operative complication compare to general anesthesia in lumbar disc herniation surgery.

Awake laparotomy: is locoregional anesthesia a functional option for major abdominal surgeries in the COVID-19 era?

OBJECTIVE: Over the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the demand for critical care beds among medical services has rapidly exceeded its supply. Elective surgery has comprehensively been drastically limited and allocating intensive care beds to emergency cases or to high risk scheduled elective cases has become an even more difficult task. Here we present our experience which could help to handle undelayable surgical procedures during this emergency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2019, eight patients (4 men, 4 women) with a mean age of 88 years, needing emergency abdominal surgery underwent awake open surgery at our Department of Surgery. All of them were identified as fragile patients at preoperative evaluation by the anesthesiologist. In all cases, locoregional anesthesia (spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia) was performed. Intraoperative and postoperative pain has been monitored and regularly assessed. RESULTS: None of the patients was intubated. Mean operative time was 80 minutes (minimum 30 minutes, maximum 130 minutes). Intraoperative and postoperative pain were both well controlled. None of them required postoperative intensive care support. No perioperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our preliminary case series, awake open surgery has resulted feasible and safe. This approach has allowed to perform undelayable major abdominal surgeries on fragile patients when intensive care beds were not available. Surely, it represents a helpful alternative in the COVID-19 era. A streamlining of workflows would fast-track both fragile patients management, as well as healthcare workers' tasks and activity.

Preoperative hypnosis for pain management after arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament.

BACKGROUND: The practice of hypnoanalgesia in orthopedics is rare and the literature is poor. AIM: The purpose of this pilot study was to verify the efficacy of hypnosis for the management of postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament. METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial over a period of 6 months (March - August 2015) including 25 patients scheduled for arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament under spinal anesthesia. All these patients had preoperative hypnosis in addition to the standard multimodal analgesia protocol (group H) and were compared to historical group (group S) who received only a standard multimodal analgesia protocol. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower for the hypnosis group during the first 48 hours postoperatively (p = 0,006). The total dose of morphine at 48 hours was: 13,6 mg (95% CI [4,58; 22,62]) in the group H and 10,2 mg (95% CI [1,64 ; 18,76]) in group S with no statistically significant difference (p = 0,178) Conclusion: Results of this pilot study in orthopedic surgery suggested that hypnosis reduced postoperative pain scores as demonstrated in other surgeries.

Perioperative anesthetic management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative chemotherapy. / Manejo anestésico perioperatorio de pacientes con mesotelioma maligno pleural intervenidos mediante cirugía citorreductora y quimioterapia intratorácica.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HITHOC) is a therapeutic option for treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Anesthetic management might be challenging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis of a case series is presented. Seven patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnostic undergoing HITHOC surgery were studied. Combined general and epidural anesthesia were administered. An intensive hemodynamic monitorization was implemented. Data regarding perioperative course was analyzed. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and October 2018 7patients underwent HITHOC procedure. Blood transfusions were administered in all patients, and 5of the 7patients required vasoactive drug administration. Extubation at the end of the procedure was able in 6of the 7patients. The median length of stay in ICU was 4 days, and 29 days for the whole hospitalary stay. No significant postoperative pain was observed. CONCLUSIONS: HITHOC surgery is a complex procedure in which several hemodynamic changes occur. An intensive intraoperative monitorization was useful for controlling complications.

Stepwise Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy: Technique Strategy and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Due to suboptimal pain control under conventional local anesthesia, percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy is typically performed under general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to develop a stepwise approach of local anesthesia for endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and evaluate its efficacy. METHODS: A stepwise local anesthesia was developed, which mainly includes 3 steps: conventional local anesthesia from skin to laminae, epidural injection, and nerve root block. From June 2015 to May 2017, consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic interlaminar discectomy were included. Local anesthesia or general anesthesia was used based on patients' preference. Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated as excellent, good, or poor, and adverse events were recorded. Hospitalization expense was compared between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: There were 98 patients included in the study. Among them, 48 received stepwise local anesthesia and the other 50 received general anesthesia. In the stepwise local anesthesia group, 40 (83.3%) patients rated anesthetic effectiveness as excellent, 7 (14.6%) as good, and 1 (2.1%) as poor. Nine patients had complications that may be associated with local anesthesia, including dyspnea, temporary paresis of legs, and temporary worsened dysesthesia or numbness in legs. After surgery, the patients' leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index significantly improved in both groups. On average, hospitalization expense was approximately 20% less when local anesthesia was used, as compared with using general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The stepwise local anesthesia can achieve satisfactory pain control and seems to be a good choice for endoscopic interlaminar discectomy.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting following lower limb surgery†:a comparison between single-injection intraarticular anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia.

Study Objective : the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following single-injection intraarticular anesthesia was compared to that following continuous epidural anesthesia. Design : Prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Setting : University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients : Forty-eight patients finally participated in this study, and each group contained twenty-four patients. Interventions : Patients scheduled to undergo lower limb surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups, to receive either single-injection intraarticular or continuous epidural anesthesia for postoperative analgesia. Measurements : The incidence and severity of PONV, complete response rates (i.e., no vomiting or rescue antiemetic use), and pain scores were recorded 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Main results : No significant differences between groups were observed in the incidence and severity of PONV, rescue antiemetic use, or complete response rate at any of the time points, but only the use of rescue analgesics was significantly less in continuous epidural anesthesia group during the 2-24h postoperative period (P=0.04). Conclusion : While the use of single-injection intraarticular anesthesia following lower limb surgery did not prevent PONV more than continuous epidural anesthesia in this study, the intraarticular technique still provides greater simplicity, safety, and cost-effectiveness. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 303-307, August, 2019.

Comparison of the efficacy of continuous epidural block with epidural electrical stimulation and conventional continuous epidural block for management of zoster-associated pain beyond the acute phase: A retrospective study.

Continuous epidural block (CEB) is a popular clinical method for controlling postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, the long-term effects of CEB on PHN have not yet been established. This study aimed to confirm the clinical efficacy of epidural electrical stimulation catheters in CEB to manage PHN.Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with subacute PHN, between 30 and 180 days after the onset of the rash; and those with chronic PHN, over 180 days after the onset of the rash. On the basis of the type of catheter used, the patients were further divided into the following 2 groups: the esopocan group, in which the site of herpes zoster infection was confirmed using a contrast medium alone; and the epistim group, in which an additional method of electrical stimulation through a guide-wire in the catheter was used for detecting the site affected by herpes. Clinical efficacy was assessed with a numerical rating scale immediately 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. We also investigated whether additional interventional treatment was necessitated because of insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up.We examined 88 patients. In the subacute PHN period, the numerical rating scale score was significantly lower in the epistim group than in the esopocan group until 6 months. In the chronic PHN period, no significant differences in the numerical rating scale scores were observed between the 2 groups until 6 months. In the subacute PHN period, the adjusted odds ratio for other interventional procedures within 6 months in the esopocan group versus the epistim group was 2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-8.09, P = .10), and in the chronic PHN period, it was 1.31 (95% CI 0.11-5.46, P = .79).Epidural drug administration to specific segments using electrical stimulation catheters may be more useful in mitigating zoster-associated pain in subacute PHN.

Neuromodulation Approaches for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Recent Advances.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe the latest advances in autonomic neuromodulation approaches to treating cardiac arrhythmias, with a focus on ventricular arrhythmias. RECENT FINDINGS: The increasing understanding of neuronal remodeling in cardiac diseases has led to the development and improvement of novel neuromodulation therapies targeting multiple levels of the autonomic nervous system. Thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal cord stimulation, stellate ganglion modulatory therapies, vagal stimulation, renal denervation, and interventions on the intracardiac nervous system have all been studied in preclinical models, with encouraging preliminary clinical data. The autonomic nervous system regulates all the electrical processes of the heart and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias. Despite recent advances in the clinical application of cardiac neuromodulation, our comprehension of the anatomy and function of the cardiac autonomic nervous system is still limited. Hopefully in the near future, more preclinical data combined with larger clinical trials will lead to further improvements in neuromodulatory treatment for heart rhythm disorders.

Comparison of 3 Anesthetic Methods for Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) under local anesthesia (LA) is growing popular in recent years because of its safety, effectiveness and increased patient demands for minimally invasive procedures. To avoid neural injuries, local anesthesia that can keep the patient conscious is recommended. However, many patients complain about the severe pain during surgery. Epidural anesthesia (EA) is an alternative choice. We put forward an anesthetic method that combined preemptive analgesia (PA) and local anesthesia. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of 3 methods of anesthesia for PTED, LA, EA and PA. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study. METHODS: Three groups of patients were treated with standard PTED under LA, PA or EA, respectively. The data collected for analysis were operative time, x-ray exposure time, postoperative bed time, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), the global outcome based on the Macnab outcome criteria, satisfaction rate of anesthesia, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 240 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study from January 2014 to December 2016. Among 3 groups, 1-week postoperatively VAS (back and leg) and ODI were improved compared with preoperative data, and the excellent/good rates were all above 90%. However, satisfaction rate of anesthesia showed significant differences among the 3 groups. PA and EA showed significantly better performance in pain management intraoperatively and 1 hour postoperatively. The operation time of group PA was the shortest and group EA was the longest. No severe neural injuries occurred in any of the 3 groups. Transient paresis of lower limbs occurred in all 3 groups and showed no significant differences. Decreased muscle strength of lower limbs postoperatively occurred in 2 patients in group EA. The incidence of nausea and vomiting postoperatively was significantly higher in group PA (6 cases, 7.50%). There were 3 cases of dysuria postoperatively in group EA (3.75%). LIMITATION: First, this is a single center study. Second, this study investigated the effects of anesthesia on perioperative period and the follow-up time was relatively short. Third, we choose morphine in group PA and there are other types of anesthetics which may be used in preemptive analgesia in further study. CONCLUSION: All 3 of these anesthetic methods are safe to avoid neural injuries. EA and PA showed better performance in pain management but had more anesthesia-related complications. KEY WORDS: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), local anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, preemptive analgesia, morphine, ropivacaine, pain management, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index (ODI).

Outcomes indicators and a risk classification system for spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review and proposal.

Over a period of decades chiropractors have utilized spinal manipulation under anesthesia (SMUA) to treat chronic back and neck pain. As an advanced form of manual therapy, SMUA is reserved for the patient whose condition has proven refractory to office-based manipulation and other modes of conservative care. Historically, the protocols and guidelines put forth by chiropractic MUA proponents have served as the clinical compass for directing MUA practice. With many authors and MUA advocates having focused primarily on anticipated benefit, the published literature contains no resource dedicated to treatment precautions and contraindications. Also absent from current relevant literature is acknowledgement or guidance on the preliminary evidence that may predict poor clinical outcomes with SMUA. This review considers risk and unfavorable outcomes indicators in therapeutic decision making for spinal manipulation under anesthesia. A new risk classification system is proposed that identifies patient safety and quality of care interests for a procedure that remains without higher-level research evidence. A scale which categorizes risk and outcome potential for SMUA is offered for the chiropractic clinician, which aims to elevate the standard of care and improve patient selection through the incorporation of specific indices from existing medical literature.

Análisis y evaluación de la efectividad de la analgesia epidural y su relación con el parto eutócico o distócico / Analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of epidural analgesia and its relationship with eutocic or dystocic delivery

Objetivo. Numerosos estudios han demostrado mayor puntuación en la escala verbal nominal del dolor en relación con el parto distócico y la inducción médica del parto, de manera que el parto distócico y la macrosomía fetal se han relacionado con una mayor sensación de dolor durante el parto, sobre todo en el primer estadio. Incluso la analgesia epidural se ha vinculado al parto instrumentado y a la cesárea. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar y evaluar la efectividad de la analgesia epidural en el parto distócico frente al parto eutócico. Pacientes y métodos. Se diseñó un estudio observacional, analítico, longitudinal y prospectivo, en el Área Obstétrica del Hospital Universitario Dexeus. Se incluyeron 180 gestantes. Fueron incluidas todas las nulíparas o multíparas con edad gestacional superior a 36 semanas, más allá de 3cm de dilatación cervical y en trabajo de parto espontáneo o inducido. Todas las pacientes recibieron la analgesia epidural según protocolo. Resultados. Para el análisis estadístico univariante de la muestra se emplearon los métodos descriptivos básicos y para la comparación de medias entre 2 grupos, el test U de Mann-Whitney. Las correlaciones entre variables se estudiaron mediante el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Las diferencias consideradas estadísticamente significativas fueron aquellas cuya p<0,05. Conclusión. En nuestra población, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la efectividad de la analgesia epidural en el parto eutócico frente al distócico. Las pacientes que recibieron la epidural que tuvieron partos distócicos presentaron la misma puntuación en la escala verbal nominal del dolor que aquellas que presentaron parto eutócico (p>0,05) (AU)

Objective. Numerous studies have demonstrated the difference in the verbal rating scale with regard to obstructed labour and induced labour, so that obstructed labour and foetal macrosomia have been related to a greater sensation of pain during labour, particularly in the first stage. Even the epidural analgesia is linked to the need for instrumented or caesarean section due to foetal obstruction. The goal of the study is to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour. Patients and methods. One hundred and eighty pregnant women were included in an observational, analytical, longitudinal and prospective study, that was performed in the Obstetrics Department of the Hospital Universitario Dexeus. All the nulliparous or multiparous over 36 weeks of pregnancy, after 3cm of cervical dilatation in spontaneous or induced labor were included. All the patients were given epidural analgesia according to protocol. Results. The basic descriptive methods were used for the univariate statistical analysis of the sample and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of means between both groups. The correlations between variables were studied by means of the Spearman coefficient of correlation. The differences regarded as statistically significant are those whose P<.05. Conclusion. In our population there were no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in normal versus obstructed labour. Patients who got epidural analgesia and had obstructed labors have the same degree of verbal rating scale as patients that do not had obstructed labors (P>.05) (AU)

Analgesic and physiological effect of electroacupuncture combined with epidural lidocaine in goats.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate physiological and antinociceptive effects of electroacupuncture (EA) with lidocaine epidural nerve block in goats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental trial. ANIMALS: Forty-eight hybrid male goats weighing 27 ± 2 kg. METHODS: The goats were randomly assigned to six groups: L2.2, epidural lidocaine (2.2 mg kg-1); L4.4, epidural lidocaine (4.4 mg kg-1); EA; EA-L1.1, EA with epidural lidocaine (1.1 mg kg-1); EA-L2.2, EA with epidural lidocaine (2.2 mg kg-1); and EA-L4.4, EA with epidural lidocaine (4.4 mg kg-1). EA was administered for 120 minutes. Epidural lidocaine was administered 25 minutes after EA started. Nociceptive thresholds of flank and thigh regions, abdominal muscle tone, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory frequency (fR) and rectal temperature were recorded at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes. RESULTS: Lidocaine dose-dependently increased nociceptive thresholds. There were no differences in nociceptive thresholds between L4.4 and EA from 30 to 120 minutes. The threshold in EA-L2.2 was lower than in EA-L4.4 from 30 to 120 minutes, but higher than in EA-L1.1 from 30 to 150 minutes or in L4.4 from 30 to 180 minutes. The abdominal muscle tone in EA-L2.2 was higher at 30 minutes, but lower at 90 and 120 minutes than at 0 minutes. There were no differences in muscle tone between L4.4 and L2.2 or EA-L4.4, and between any two of the three EA-lidocaine groups from 0 to 180 minutes. The fR and HR decreased in L4.4 at 60 and 90 minutes compared with 0 minutes. No differences in fR, HR, MAP and temperature among the groups occurred from 30 to 180 minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EA combined with 2.2 mg kg-1 epidural lidocaine provides better antinociceptive effect than 4.4 mg kg-1 epidural lidocaine alone in goats. EA provided antinociception and allowed a decrease in epidural lidocaine dose.

A randomized controlled trial comparing paravertebral block via the surgical field with thoracic epidural block using ropivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief.

PURPOSE: We conducted a comparative study to evaluate analgesic efficacy between paravertebral block via the surgical field (PVB-sf), in which the catheter was inserted into the ventral side of the sympathetic trunk in the paravertebral space by a thoracic surgeon under thoracoscopic visualization, and epidural block (Epi) using ropivacaine for post-thoracotomy pain relief. METHODS: Lung cancer patients scheduled for lobectomy via thoracotomy were randomly allocated to receive either PVB-sf or Epi (n = 36 per group). Before thoracotomy closure, 0.375% ropivacaine was administered as a bolus (PVB-sf, 20 mL; Epi, 5 mL), followed by a 300-mL continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) score at various time points, including the primary endpoint of 2 h after ropivacaine bolus injection. Sensory block area, vital signs, serum ropivacaine concentrations, and side effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: The Epi group showed significantly lower VAS scores and blood pressure and a wider sensory block area than the PVB-sf group at all evaluation time points. While the mean serum ropivacaine concentration in the PVB-sf group was significantly higher than that in the Epi group until 1 h after injection of the ropivacaine bolus, there was no significant difference at any subsequent assessment point. The incidence of side effects was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: The Epi was superior to PVB-sf for the management of post-thoracotomy pain in this patient cohort. The number of dermatomes anaesthetized by Epi was greater than that anaesthetized by PVB-sf. No difference in complication rates was observed between the two groups.

THE EFFECT OF A SINGLE DOSE OF MAGNESIUM SULPHATE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE FOR INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL.

CONTEXT: Epidural anesthesia provides the advantage of segmental blockade and many adjuvants have been added to shorten the onset of action, improve the quality of analgesia and prolong the duration of analgesia. Magnesium sulphate(MgSO4) by virtue of its anti-iociceptive property has been administered by various routes. AIM: To assess the effect of MgSO4 on the duration of onset of action of injection bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, randomized control study was conducted in 40 patients. Group M received 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml of 50 mg MgSO4 and Group C received 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml of normal saline via epidural route. Onset time of the sensory and motor blockade were the primary outcomes studied. Highest level of sensory block, time for two segment regression, hemodynamic parameters, side effects were the secondary parameters. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the groups in the mean onset time of sensory blockade at T8, 12.85 ± 2.32 min in Group M and 16.75 ± 1.74 min in Group C. Median level of sensory blockade was comparable. Mean onset time of motor blockade was 13.85 ± 3.28 min in Group M and 23.25 ± 3.35 min in Group C which was clinically and statistically significant. Time for two segment regression of sensory blockade was 95.75 ± 11.84 min in Group M and 55.5 ± 8.57 min in Group C which was significant. Hemodynamic parameters and side effects were comparable. CONCLUSION: Magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant provides rapid onset of epidural anesthesia and prolongs the duration of analgesia with minimal side effects.

Spontaneous ventilation anaesthesia: total intravenous anaesthesia with local anaesthesia or thoracic epidural anaesthesia for thoracoscopic bullectomy.

OBJECTIVES: At present, few data exist regarding the comparisons of perioperative outcomes and recurrence of spontaneous ventilation (SV) video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) bullectomy using total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with local anaesthesia (LA) or thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA). We evaluated the feasibility and safety of TIVA with LA in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients undergoing VATS bullectomy between July 2011 and May 2015; 240 patients were included for analysis. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables of patients undergoing VATS bullectomy using TIVA-TEA (n = 140) were compared with those using TIVA-LA (n = 100). RESULTS: Baseline demographics were similar between groups. No patients in either group required conversion to thoracotomy. Three patients (TIVA-TEA: 2; TIVA-LA: 1) required conversion to intubated general anaesthesia. Both groups had comparable surgical duration, estimated blood loss, peak EtCO2 and lowest intraoperative SpO2 level. Postoperatively, thoracic drainage volume, duration of chest tube drainage and hospitalization cost did not differ between groups. The incidence of postoperative complications between groups was not significant (2% for TIVA-TEA vs 2% for TIVA-LA, P = 1.00). Pneumothorax recurrence rate was 3% in TIVA-TEA cases (n = 4) and 2% in TIVA-LA cases (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: SV-VATS bullectomy using TIVA with LA or TEA is technically feasible and safe. Both groups have comparable short-term outcomes and recurrence rates; TIVA-LA seems a valid alternative to TIVA-TEA for the surgical management of PSP under SV.

Epidural pressure changes following caudal blockade: a prospective, observational study.

PURPOSE: Recent case reports raise the question as to whether anesthetic agents injected into the epidural space could lead to a 'compartment syndrome' and neurovascular sequelae. Single-shot caudal epidural anesthesia has been established as a safe technique, but changes in pressure in the caudal epidural space have not been described. Our aim was to study pressure changes to provide preliminary information for future studies design. METHODS: We prospectively measured the pressure changes in the caudal epidural space in 31 pediatric patients. The pressures were measured at loss of resistance, immediately after the bolus dose of local anesthetic (1 ml/kg), and at 15-s intervals up to 3 min. RESULTS: The pressure at loss of resistance was 35.6 ± 27.8 mmHg. A pulsatile waveform was observed once the epidural space was accessed. The pressure after administration of the local anesthetic bolus (1 ml/kg 0.2 % ropivacaine/bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine) was 192.5 ± 93.3 mmHg. The pressure decreased to 51.5 ± 39.0 mmHg at 15 s, 26.9 ± 9.9 mmHg after 2 min, and 24.7 ± 11.7 after 3 min. The return to baseline occurred at approximately 45-60 s. CONCLUSIONS: Following the administration of the local anesthetic into the caudal epidural space, there was a marked, but transient, increase in the pressure within the epidural space. It appears unlikely that a slow epidural catheter infusion could lead to a sustained increase in epidural pressure.

Emulsified halothane produces long-term epidural anesthetic effect: a study in rabbits.

Previous studies have demonstrated that volatile anesthetics could produce local anesthesia. Emulsified isoflurane at 8% has been reported to produce epidural anesthetic effect in rabbits. This study was designed to investigate the long-term epidural anesthetic effect of emulsified halothane in rabbits. In this study, 40 healthy adult rabbits (weighting 2.0-2.5 kg) with an epidural catheter were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10/group), receiving epidural administration of 1% lidocaine (lido group), 8% emulsified isoflurane 1ml (8% E-iso group), 8% emulsified halothane (8% E-Halo group) and 12% emulsified halothane (12% E-Halo group). After administration, sensory and motor functions as well as consciousness state were assessed until 60 minutes after sensory and motor function returned to its baseline or at least for 180 min. After epidural anesthesia, all the rabbits were continuously observed for 7 days and sacrificed for pathological evaluations. As a result, all the four study solutions produced typical epidural anesthesia. Onset times of sensory and motor function blockade were similar among the four groups (P>0.05). Duration of sensory blockade in 12% E-Halo group (83±13 min) was significantly longer than other groups: 51±12 min in 8% E-Halo group (P<0.01), 57±8 min in 8% E-iso group (P<0.01) and 47±9 min in lido group (P<0.01). Duration of sensory blockade in 8% E-iso group is longer than lido group (P<0.05). Duration of motor blockade in 12% E-Halo group (81±12 min) was also significantly longer than other groups: 40±8 min in 8% E-Halo group (P<0.01), 37±3 min in 8% E-iso group (P<0.01), 37±6 min in lido group (P<0.01). Normal consciousness was found in the rabbits from 8% E-Halo, 8% E-iso and lido groups while there were four rabbits in 12% E-Halo group (4/10) showed a light sedation. For all the rabbits, no pathological injury was found. The present study demonstrates that emulsified halothane produces reversible concentration-dependent epidural anesthesia and at 12% (v/v), emulsified halothane could produce long-term anesthesia without pathological injury.

Sparing effects of sufentanil on epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate surgery.

PURPOSE: This study examined the sparing effect of sufentanil on the median effective concentration (EC50) of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing elective transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study. Fifty eight elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for TURP surgery under epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to a group receiving 15 mL of ropivacaine (group R) or a group receiving ropivacaine plus 5 µg of sufentanil (group RS). The concentration of ropivacaine was determined by a Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation. The first participant received 0.3% of ropivacaine in both groups and subsequent concentrations were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine was analyzed using the Dixon and Massey method. RESULTS: The EC50 of ropivacaine during TURP surgery was 0.186% (95% confidence interval, 0.173-0.200%) in group R, and 0.136% (95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.144%) in group RS (p<0.01). No differences in Bromage scale of motor block examination and the onset time of sensory block were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of 5 µg of epidural sufentanil caused a 37% reduction in the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients who underwent TURP surgery. Thus, sufentanil addition during surgery of TURP can decrease the dose of ropivacaine anesthesia required.

Ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block provides comparable analgesia and fewer episodes of hypotension than continuous epidural block after lung surgery.

PURPOSE: Both paravertebral block (PVB) and thoracic epidural block (TEB) are recommended for postoperative pain relief after lung surgery. The addition of fentanyl to the anesthetic solution became popular for TEB because of the stronger effects; however, there have been few comparable trials about the addition of fentanyl to PVB. The purpose of this study was thus to compare postoperative analgesia, side effects, and complications between ultrasound-guided PVB (USG-PVB) and TEB with the addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine after lung surgery. METHODS: We examined 90 consecutive patients (age 18-75 years) scheduled for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). In both groups, all blocks (four blocks in USG-PVB and one block in TEB) and one catheter insertion were performed preoperatively. Continuous postoperative infusion (0.1% ropivacaine plus fentanyl at 0.4 mg/day) was undertaken for 36 h in both groups. The recorded data included the verbal rating scale (VRS) for pain, blood pressure, side effects, complications for 2 days, and overall satisfaction score. RESULTS: There was no difference in the frequency of taking supplemental analgesics (twice or more frequently), or in VRS. Hypotension occurred significantly more frequently in TEB (n = 7/33) than in PVB (n = 1/36) (P = 0.02); on the other hand, the incidences of PONV and pruritus, as well as overall satisfaction score, were similar. There were no complications in both groups; however, the catheters migrated intrathoracically in four patients in PVB. CONCLUSION: USG-PVB achieved similar pain relief and lowered the incidence of hypotension compared with TEB. We conclude that both blocks with the same concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl can provide adequate postoperative analgesia for VATS.