Coenzyme Q10 inhibits intracranial aneurysm formation and progression in a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a commonly used nutritional supplement, on intracranial aneurysm (IA) initiation and progression in a mouse model, as well as the mechanism. METHODS: Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used to treat mouse-derived vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) to induce oxidative injury, followed by incubation with CoQ10. In the mouse IA model established by elastase injection, CoQ10 was orally administered at 10 mg/kg every other day for 14 days, during which the incidence of IA, rupture rate, symptom-free survival, and systolic blood pressure were recorded. RESULTS: CoQ10 promoted the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 and antioxidant enzymes. In H2O2-treated VSMCs, reactive oxygen species and cell apoptosis were reduced by CoQ10. In IA mice, CoQ10 treatment decreased the rupture rate of IA, improved the symptom-free survival, and reduced systolic blood pressure. Macrophage infiltration and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the cerebral arteries were mitigated by CoQ10 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CoQ10 is effective in reducing oxidative stress in VSMCs, thereby attenuating IA formation and rupture in mice. CoQ10 also alleviates inflammation and restores normal phenotypes of VSMCs in the cerebral arteries. Our data suggest that CoQ10 is a potentially effective drug for managing IA. IMPACT: To investigate the effect of CoQ10, a commonly used nutritional supplement, on IA initiation and progression in a mouse model, as well as the mechanism. CoQ10 promoted the expression of Nrf2 and antioxidant enzymes. In H2O2-treated VSMCs, ROS and cell apoptosis were reduced by CoQ10. CoQ10 is effective in reducing oxidative stress in VSMCs, thereby attenuating IA formation and rupture in mice.

Effect of adjunctive lidocaine-based scalp block and laryngotracheal local anesthesia vs general anesthesia only on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations in patients with cerebral aneurysm: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To compare the effect of adjunctive lidocaine-based scalp block and laryngotracheal local anesthesia vs general anesthesia only on pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations in patients with non-ruptured brain aneurysms undergoing elective open surgery. METHODS: This parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted at Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb between March 2019 and March 2020. At the beginning of anesthesia, lidocaine group received 40 mg of 2% lidocaine for laryngotracheal topical anesthesia and 4 mg/kg for the scalp block. Control group underwent general anesthesia only. Plasma concentrations of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1ß were measured before anesthesia (S0); at the incision (S1); at the end of surgery (S2); 24 hours postoperatively (S3). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine concentrations were measured at the incision (L1) and the end of surgery (L2). RESULTS: Forty patients (each group, 20) were randomized; 37 were left in the final analysis. IL-6 plasma concentrations increased significantly compared with baseline at S3 in lidocaine group, and at S2 and S3 in control group. In both groups, changes in TNF-α and IL-1ß were not significant. CSF cytokine concentrations in lidocaine group did not change significantly; in control group IL-6 and IL-1ß were significantly higher at L2 than at L1. CSF IL-6 in control group significantly increased at L2, but TNF-α and IL-1ß did not. No differences in clinical outcome and complication rates were observed. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive lidocaine-based scalp block and laryngotracheal local anesthesia might attenuate CSF IL-6 concentration increase in patients with brain aneurysm.

Effectiveness comparisons of drug therapies for postoperative aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: network meta­analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of various drug interventions in improving the clinical outcome of postoperative patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and assist in determining the drugs of definite curative effect in improving clinical prognosis. METHODS: Eligible Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were searched in databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (inception to Sep 2020). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) score or modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used as the main outcome measurements to evaluate the efficacy of various drugs in improving the clinical outcomes of postoperative patients with aSAH. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted based on a random-effects model, dichotomous variables were determined by using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated to estimate the ranking probability of comparative effectiveness among different drug therapies. RESULTS: From the 493 of initial citation screening, forty-four RCTs (n = 10,626 participants) were eventually included in our analysis. Our NMA results showed that cilostazol (OR = 3.35,95%CI = 1.50,7.51) was the best intervention to improve the clinical outcome of patients (SUCRA = 87.29%, 95%CrI 0.07-0.46). Compared with the placebo group, only two drug interventions [nimodipine (OR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.01,2.57) and cilostazol (OR = 3.35, 95%CI 1.50, 7.51)] achieved significant statistical significance in improving the clinical outcome of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both nimodipine and cilostazol have exact curative effect to improve the outcome of postoperative patients with aSAH, and cilostazol may be the best drug to improve the outcome of patients after aSAH operation. Our study provides implications for future studies that, the combination of two or more drugs with relative safety and potential benefits (e.g., nimodipine and cilostazol) may improve the clinical outcome of patients more effectively.

Tanshinone IIA attenuates cerebral aneurysm formation by inhibiting the NF­κB­mediated inflammatory response.

The inflammatory response plays a vital role in cerebral aneurysm (CA) formation and progression. Tanshinone  IIA (Tan IIA) is one of the major active components of Chinese medicine Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge) and is widely used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, due to its anti­inflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether Tan IIA can attenuate CA formation in rat models, and determine its underlying mechanisms. CAs were induced in rats surgically and through high­salt diet treatments. The Tan IIA­treated group displayed relatively mild symptoms, as compared with the control group. Tan IIA treatment reduced macrophage infiltration and nuclear factor (NF)­κB activation in aneurysmal walls. Next, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)­stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells were used to examine the anti­inflammatory effects of Tan IIA on macrophages. It was found that Tan IIA reversed LPS­induced differentiation of RAW 264.7 cells and suppressed NF­κB pathway activation. In conclusion, these findings demonstrated that Tan IIA can suppress CA formation by inhibiting inflammatory responses in macrophages.

Impact of Early Versus Late Intravenous Followed by Oral Nimodipine Treatment on the Occurrence of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Among Patients With Aneurysm Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management recommend treatment with nimodipine to all patients to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor clinical outcome. However, it did not give the most beneficial time to start therapy and route of administration. OBJECTIVES: To compare the DCI occurrence and clinical outcome among aSAH patients who received nimodipine treatment at different times. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting data from medical chart reviews between August 30, 2010, and October 31, 2015, at Prasart Neurological Institute, Thailand. Patients were classified into 2 groups by time to receive nimodipine: early group and late group (<96 and >96 hours, respectively). All patients received intravenous (IV) followed by oral nimodipine to complete treatment course. Clinical outcome was graded using the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 21 days. The factors related to DCI were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were recruited: early (n = 97) and late (n = 52). No difference in baseline characteristics between groups was observed. The occurrence of DCI was not statistically significantly different between groups (early group, 18.60%, vs late group, 20.80%; P = 0.74). The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies IV to V was associated with DCI occurrence. The proportion of patients with good outcome, poor outcome, or death did not show any difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Receiving IV nimodipine 3 to 7 days following oral therapy after bleeding can be the alternative regimen in patients who did not start nimodipine within 96 hours.

Effects of 14 Versus 21 Days of Nimodipine Therapy on Neurological Outcomes in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.

BACKGROUND: Oral nimodipine is standard therapy for patients suffering an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). During a national drug shortage, nimodipine therapy was shortened from a 21-day course to a 14-day course at our institution. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare neurological outcomes among patients who had previously received the standard duration of therapy compared with those who received a shortened duration as a result of the national drug shortage. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients receiving nimodipine for aSAH from January 2012 to August 2013. Neurological outcome, graded by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge, was compared between patients receiving a shortened course and those receiving the standard duration of nimodipine. RESULTS: A total of 199 aSAH patients were included in the analysis. There were 164 patients in the standard-duration and 35 patients in the shortened-duration group. Baseline patient severity of illness, assessed by SAPS II (Simplified Acute Physiology Score), and severity of aSAH, assessed by Fisher grade, and Hunt and Hess grade scores, did not differ between the treatment groups. A shortened duration of nimodipine was not associated with a higher risk of a poor neurological outcome defined by mRS (odds ratio = 1.85; 95% CI = 0.54-6.32; P = 0.32). Mortality rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 14-day course of nimodipine therapy was not associated with worse neurological outcomes in aSAH patients at one institution. More studies are needed prior to recommending a shortened duration of nimodipine therapy in all aSAH patients.

Is intra arterial nimodipine really beneficial in vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage?

UNLABELLED: Object/Background: Vasospasm is a common cause of mortality and morbidity following rupture of intracranial aneurysm. Hemodynamic therapy instituted in these patients in the past has been replaced by direct manipulation of the spastic vessels by angioplasty and intra-arterial infusion of vasodilators. However, no case control studies exist proving its superiority. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of intra-arterial nimodipine (IAN) to that of hemodynamic therapy in patients with vasospasm following aSAH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients who developed vasospasm following aSAH were included in the study. IAN was instilled in addition to hemodynamic therapy in 39 patients and 14 patients (who refused to give consent for IAN) were continued on hemodynamic therapy alone and served as controls. The response to IAN was studied on angiogram. The clinical response was assessed in both the groups at regular intervals. IAN was repeated if necessary. The outcome (GOS) at discharge and at 3 months after discharge was compared. RESULTS: Thirty-six (92.3%) out of 39 patients showed immediate angiographic reversal of vasospasm.28 of them showed clinical response, of which only 11 had lasting response. 11(28.2%) of 39 patients who received IAN had a good outcome at discharge and 23(58.9%) had a favourable outcome at 3 months follow up. In those who received hemodynamic therapy alone, 4 out of 14(28.6%) patients had a good outcome at discharge and 8 (57.1%) a favourable outcome at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic reversal of vasospasm is seen in majority of the patients following IAN. However, this does not necessarily translate into a long lasting clinical response. The final outcome in patients who received hemodynamic therapy is comparable to those who received additional IAN. IAN does not appear to provide a major added advantage over the conventional hemodynamic therapy.

Hemodynamic management and outcome of patients treated for cerebral vasospasm with intraarterial nicardipine and/or milrinone.

BACKGROUND: Vasospasm is a potentially devastating complication after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although endovascular treatment with intraarterial nicardipine and milrinone is an accepted clinical treatment strategy, there is little information either on hemodynamic management during treatment or on outcome and consequences of the hemodynamic management. We tested 2 hypotheses: (1) intraarterial administration of nicardipine and milrinone to treat cerebral vasospasm would require increased administration of vasoconstrictor to support arterial blood pressure at target levels; and (2) high-dose vasopressors administered to increase blood pressure in these patients would lead to systemic acidosis and end-organ ischemic damage. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients with clinically symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage that failed medical management with "triple H therapy" and subsequently received intraarterial nicardipine and/or milrinone between March 2005 and July 2007. RESULTS: Of 160 endovascular interventions in 73 patients (aged 52 +/- 10 years; 50 women), 96 received only nicardipine, 5 only milrinone, and 59 both drugs. General anesthesia with muscle relaxation was performed for 93% of procedures. During treatment, both the number and dose of vasopressors required to maintain arterial blood pressure at target levels increased; the median dose of phenylephrine increased from 200 (n = 121) to 325 microg/min (n = 122), norepinephrine increased from 12 (n = 60) to 24.5 microg/min (n = 87), and vasopressin infusions increased from 7 to 24. Nonetheless, arterial blood pressure decreased 13% during treatment. In >90% of procedures, the postprocedure angiogram showed improved vessel caliber. A single patient demonstrated troponin T increase; no patients had a decrease in renal function, bowel or peripheral ischemia, systemic acidosis, or acute stroke. Overall mortality was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial administration of nicardipine and/or milrinone requires use of vasopressors to maintain arterial blood pressure. Despite high doses of vasoconstrictors, treatment has low mortality, minimal end-organ ischemic damage or systemic acidosis, and results in improved caliber of cerebral vessels affected by vasospasm.

Nifedipine inhibits the progression of an experimentally induced cerebral aneurysm in rats with associated down-regulation of NF-kappa B transcriptional activity.

Cerebral aneurysm (CA) causes a life-threatening subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, no effective medical treatment to prevent the growth of CA is available. Nifedipine, a widely used calcium antagonist, was shown to improve endothelial function in various cardiovascular diseases. We examined whether nifedipine has a protective effect on CA progression. CAs were experimentally induced in Sprague-Dawley rats followed by intraperitoneal injection of either 10mg/kg of nifedipine per day or vehicle. The size and media thickness of CAs were measured one month after aneurysm induction. NF-kappa B (NF-kappaB) activity in aneurysmal walls was assessed by immunohistochemistry for activated NF-kappaB p65 subunit and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Expression of monocyte chomoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -2 in aneurysmal walls was examined by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. To examine whether nifedipine has a suppressive effect on preexisting CAs, nifedipine administration started at one month after aneurysm induction and pathological changes were assessed at two months after aneurysm induction. Aneurysm size was smaller and the media was thicker in the nifedipine-treated group even though blood pressure was not different between groups. Nifedipine inhibited DNA binding of NF-kappaB in aneurysmal walls. As regards MCP-1 expression and macrophage, which is the main inflammatory cell in the aneurysmal walls, infiltration into aneurysmal walls was decreased by nifedipine. Immunohistochemistry and gelatin zymography showed that the expression and activity of MMP-2 was also reduced by nifedipine. Furthermore, nifedipine significantly prevented the enlargement and degeneration of aneurysmal walls of preexisting CAs. Nifedipine may be useful as a medical drug for patients with CAs.

Recurrent embolic stroke originating from an internal carotid aneurysm in a young adult.

An unruptured intracranial aneurysm is an uncommon but possible embolic source to the brain. We report a young patient who developed recurrent ischemic strokes occurring mainly in the left internal carotid arterial territory within a short interval; the first stroke occurred midway through a long-distance race, and the second stroke occurred immediately following a bowel movement. The angiographical contrast deficit indicated a thrombus in the left anterior cerebral artery as a result of the embolism. A saccular aneurysm of the left distal internal carotid artery was the only detectable potential embolic source. Initially anticoagulant therapy was given, and then surgical clipping of the aneurysm was performed. The patient has been free from stroke recurrence. As a cause of ischemic stroke in young adults, a carotid saccular aneurysm should be considered. Hard exercise and a Valsalva maneuver may be important triggers of thrombus detachment from the aneurysm.

Magnesium sulfate therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

OBJECT: Vasospasm remains a significant source of neurological morbidity and mortality following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), despite advances in current medical, surgical, and endovascular therapies. Magnesium sulfate therapy has been demonstrated to be both safe and effective in preventing neurological complications in obstetrical patients with eclampsia. Evidence obtained using experimental models of brain injury, cerebral ischemia, and SAH indicate that Mg may also have a role as a neuroprotective agent. The authors hypothesize that MgSO4 therapy is safe, feasible, and has a beneficial effect on vasospasm and, ultimately, on neurological outcome following aneurysmal SAH. METHODS: A prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial of high-dose MgSO4 therapy following aneurysmal SAH (Hunt and Hess Grades II-IV) was performed in 40 patients, who were enrolled within 72 hours following SAH and given intravenous MgSO4 or control solution for 10 days. Serum Mg++ levels were maintained in the 4 to 5.5 mg/dl range throughout the treatment period. Clinical management principles were the same between groups (including early use of surgery or endovascular treatment, followed by aggressive vasospasm prophylaxis and treatment). Daily transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonographic recordings were obtained, and clinical outcomes were measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The patients' GOS scores and the TCD recordings were analyzed using the independent t-test. Forty patients were enrolled in the study: 20 (15 female and five male patients) received treatment and 20 (11 female and nine male patients) comprised a control group. The mean ages of the patients in these groups were 46 and 51, respectively, and the mean clinical Hunt and Hess grades were 2.6 +/- 0.68 in the MgSO4 treatment group and 2.3 +/- 0.73 in the control group (mean +/- standard deviation [SD], p = 0.87). Fisher grades were similar in both groups. Mean middle cerebral artery velocities were 93 +/- 27 cm/second in MgSO4-treated patients and 102 +/- 34 cm/second in the control group (mean +/- SD, p = 0.41). Symptomatic vasospasm, confirmed by angiography, occurred in six of 20 patients receiving MgSO4 and in five of 16 patients receiving placebo. Mean GOS scores were 3.8 +/- 1.6 and 3.6 +/- 1.5 (mean +/- SD, p = 0.74) in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Significant adverse effects from treatment with MgSO4 did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of high-dose MgSO4 following aneurysmal SAH is safe, and steady Mg++ levels in the range of 4 to 5.5 mg/dl are easily maintained. This treatment does not interfere with neurological assessment, administration of anesthesia during surgery, or other aspects of clinical care. We observed a trend in which a higher percentage of patients obtained GOS scores of 4 or 5 in the group treated with MgSO4, but the trend did not reach a statistically significant level. A larger study is needed to evaluate this trend further.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nimodipine treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of nimodipine administration after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and surgery. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients of both sexes who had a ruptured aneurysm (verified using angiography), who presented with Hunt and Hess Grades I to III on admission, who underwent an operation within the first week after SAH, and who had participated in a randomized prospective clinical trial of nimodipine medication were enrolled in the study. The efficiency (cost-effectiveness) of nimodipine treatment was evaluated by incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. The cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated for two groups: patients treated with nimodipine and patients given placebo. The cost was estimated as direct hospitalization costs, and the patient outcome was measured as life years gained. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for nimodipine treatment was $223 per life year gained on the basis of 1996 monetary values and contemporary management of SAH. Patients in the nimodipine group had an average of 3.46 years longer life expectancy (incremental effectiveness) than those in the placebo group. There was a significant difference in 3-month follow-up mortality and a slight difference in sickness pensions during the 10 years after SAH. Nimodipine treatment was associated with a significant decrease in mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in the length of hospital stay. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in sickness pensions. CONCLUSION: Nimodipine is cost-effective. Therefore, its use in the management of patients with SAH seems economically justified because it increases patient life years at very low incremental cost.

Calcium antagonists in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It has been reported that nimodipine reduces the frequency of secondary ischemia and improves outcome after aneurysmal SAH, but definitive evidence concerning all available calcium antagonists is lacking. METHODS: Systematic overview of randomized trials that were completed by January 1996 compared calcium antagonists with control and started treatment within 10 days after onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was performed. All calcium antagonists studied thus far (nimodipine, nicardipine, and AT877) were included. RESULTS: We analyzed 10 trials totaling 2756 patients. The relative risk (RR) reduction of poor outcome (death or dependency) was 16% (95% CI, 6 to 27%) and that of case fatality was 10% (95% CI, -6 to 25%). To prevent one poor outcome, 19 (12 to 59) patients need to be treated. Calcium antagonists give a 33% (95%, CI 25 to 41) RR reduction in the frequency of ischemic neurologic deficit and a 20% (95% CI, 11 to 28) RR reduction in the frequency of CT-scan documented cerebral infarction. Eight (6 to 11) patients need to be treated to prevent one ischemic neurologic deficit. In the analyses for nimodipine only, treatment was associated with a 24% RR reduction of poor outcome (95% CI, 12 to 38). To prevent one poor outcome, 13 (8 to 30) patients need to be treated with nimodipine. The RR reduction of angiographically detected cerebral vasospasm was statistically significant for AT877 (38%; 95% CI, 17 to 54%) and nicardipine (21%; 95% CI, 6 to 34%) but not for nimodipine (9%; 95% CI, -2 to 19%). CONCLUSION: Calcium antagonists reduce the proportion of ischemic neurologic deficits and nimodipine improves overall outcome within 3 months of aneurysmal SAH; evidence for a reduction of poor outcome from all causes by nicardipine and AT877 is inconclusive. The intermediate factors by which nimodipine exerts its beneficial effect remain uncertain.

The association of tranexamic acid and nimodipine in the pre-operative treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

In the scope of a late intervention policy on ruptured intracranial aneurysms, on D.+12 on an average, we first used tranexamic acid, at moderate doses: 3 g orally or 1.5 g intravenously per day. We, subsequently, added nimodipine, usually 240 mg orally per day or 2 mg intravenously per hour. The medical treatment consisted of amply sufficient hydration, and in systematic and regular administration of analgesics and sedatives. Hypotension was absolutely avoided; if necessary, an antihypertensive treatment was prescribed very cautiously. Phenytoin was regularly given. In the present study, we try to answer the following questions: (1) Can we confirm that the preventive action of tranexamic acid remains as effective, when doses, markedly lower than usually recommended, are used? (2) Does nimodipine prevent the increase of pre-operative ischaemic complications, which should be expected when tranexamic acid is administered? Amongst 101 patients with SAH of proven aneurysmal origin, 84 were treated with tranexamic acid and nimodipine. In 25 patients, an aneurysm was not visualised; 21 received this treatment. For several reasons, only a retrospective study was possible, to evaluate the results of our antifibrinolytic and calcium-blocking therapies, on rebleeding and pre-operative delayed ischaemia. We compared, therefore, similar cases from the literature, with our own cases, taking into consideration the clinical grades, the days of admission and of intervention, the moment of rebleeding and of delayed pre-operative ischaemia, etc. The following impressions emerge: (1) same effectiveness of moderate doses of tranexamic acid; (2) no increase of pre-operative delayed ischaemic complications, in comparison with patients not receiving antifibrinolytics but nimodipine; (3) important role of a devastating initial bleed and of operative complications; (4) difficulty of avoiding rebleeding at D.0, whatever the therapeutic measures, medical and/or surgical.

A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial of tirilazad mesylate in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cooperative study in North America.

To test the safety and efficacy of tirilazad mesylate, a nonglucocorticoid 21-aminosteroid, in improving the outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), 902 patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial at 54 North American neurosurgical centers. Five patients were excluded prior to receiving any study drug. Of 897 patients who received at least one dose of study medication, 300 received a placebo containing a citrate vehicle, 298 received 2 mg/kg per day tirilazad, and 299 received 6 mg/kg per day tirilazad, all administered intravenously beginning within 48 hours of the SAH and continuing through 10 days posthemorrhage. All patients were also treated with orally administered nimodipine. At 3 months post-SAH, there were no significant differences (p < 0.025) among the groups with regard to mortality rate, favorable outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, or employment status. During the first 14 days after the SAH, there were no significant differences among the groups in the incidence or severity of clinically symptomatic or angiographically identifiable cerebral vasospasm. Mortality data stratified by gender and neurological grade on admission (assessed according to a modified World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale) demonstrated that the men with Grades IV to V had a 33% mortality rate in the vehicle group, 52% in the 2 mg/kg per day tirilazad group (p = 0.29), and 5% in the 6 mg/kg per day tirilazad group (p = 0.03). Tirilazad was well tolerated at both dose levels. Tirilazad mesylate at dosage levels of up to 6 mg/kg per day for 8 to 10 days following SAH did not improve the overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH in this trial. The differences in the efficacy of tirilazad in this trial and a previously reported trial in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, in which dosage levels of tirilazad of 6 mg/kg per day reduced mortality rates and increased good recovery, may be a result of differences in admission characteristics of the patients and/or differences in management protocols, including the use of anticonvulsant medications.

The effect of nimodipine monotherapy and combined treatment with ketamine and lignocaine in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

The clinical effects of nimodipine monotherapy were compared with the effects of nimodipine combined with ketamine and lignocaine (combination therapy) in a single-centre, one investigator, open study in patients with proven aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). After clipping of the aneurysm, nimodipine was administered intravenously until day 5-7 after clipping. Thereafter the intravenous nimodipine was substituted by oral doses of nimodipine. These were decreased gradually and then discontinued within the following 6 days. For combination therapy, nimodipine was given together with both a bolus injection of 1 microgram/kg ketamine followed by an infusion of the drug at a rate of 3 micrograms/kg/min and a bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lignocaine followed by an infusion of the drug at a rate of 12 micrograms/kg/min. During the study period, 173 patients were admitted to the hospital with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Of these patients, 115 with a proven aneurysm were operated on and evaluated: 66 patients received nimodipine monotherapy and 49 were given nimodipine combined with ketamine and lignocaine. These subgroups were comparable in terms of the baseline characteristics (age, Hunt and Hess score). The (baseline corrected) Hunt and Hess scores after surgery and a 0-5 clinical outcome score were applied as indices for clinical effects. Patients receiving nimodipine monotherapy and combined therapy showed a significant clinical improvement compared to baseline (P = 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). The beneficial effect of nimodipine monotherapy is in line with previous double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Although nimodipine monotherapy seems to be more effective than combined treatment, this was not statistically significant. Our data indicate that combined treatment with ketamine and lignocaine is not more effective than nimodipine monotherapy in patients with mild aSAH, but this does not rule out an effect in severe cases. There was no indication of a pharmacodynamic interaction between nimodipine and co-medication. No serious or clinically relevant adverse reactions were noted during the study.

Does nimodipine influence sex difference in outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage?

Before nimodipine was introduced as a standard treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) females had a significantly poorer outcome which might be due to a higher frequency of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI). We evaluated the overall outcome with regard to gender in 188 consecutive patients with a verified ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated with nimodipine. The only significant differences concerning prognostic factors between the sexes were a higher frequency of SAH at the primary CT in female (p < 0.05) and a higher frequency of middle cerebral artery aneurysms in females (p < 0.01). These factors affect the outcome in females unfavourably. However, contrary to previous studies, we found no difference in overall outcome after three months between the sexes in this clinical material. Our observation can be explained by a positive effect of nimodipine on DCI.

Hypotensive effect of nimodipine during treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

To determine the incidence of induced systemic hypotension in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and nimodipine treatment 87 consecutive cases were reviewed. The patients were managed according to the same Nimodipine treatment protocol. After confirmation of SAH the nimodipine treatment was started as a continuous intravenous perfusion at a dosage of 0.5 mg/h and gradually increased every 6 hours if haemodynamically tolerated until the maintenance dose of 2 mg/h was reached. Median systemic pressure was continuously measured and tolerated until a lowest limit of 75 mmHg. In 31 patients (36%) hypotension with values below 75 mmHg during at least 30 minutes was noted and needed Nimodipine reduction. Intravenous Nimodipine administration was responsible for hypotension in 26 cases as compared to 5 cases due to oral administration. 38% of all patients required support by vaso-active agents (Dopamine or Nor-adrenaline). There was no statistically significant difference of incidence of delayed ischaemic deterioration comparing the Nimodipine-reduction group with the normal dose group. This study demonstrates that a considerable risk exists of Nimodipine induced hypotension in intravenous administration despite gradually increasing the doses. Correction of hypotension through further induced hypervolaemia accompanied by vasoactive agents can lead to critical haemodynamic situations. We therefore recommend oral Nimodipine administration.