An emulated target trial analysis based on Medicare data suggested non-inferiority of Dabigatran versus Rivaroxaban.

OBJECTIVES: Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran were the first two non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for preventing stroke among non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation patients. This article aimed to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of Rivaroxaban versus Dabigatran. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: An emulated target trial analysis was conducted based on Medicare, in which we constructed three "randomized clinical trials" with well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, treatment regimens, and analysis procedures. We analyzed the individual trials, examined temporal variations, and generated unified results via pooled analysis. RESULTS: With a two-year data collection window (2012-2013), 70,129 subjects were enrolled in the three emulated trials, with 36,269 and 34,089 in the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran arms, respectively. Dabigatran (the reference group for hazard ratio - HR) was superior regarding time to any primary event (including ischemic stroke, other thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and death; HR 1.232, P-value 0.0025), major bleeding (HR 1.187, P-value <0.0001), and mortality (HR 1.488, P-value <0.0001). Differences regarding stroke and other thromboembolic events were not significant. CONCLUSION: Dabigatran was found as superior for the Medicare patients with multiple chronic conditions. Temporal variations, which had been largely neglected in the literature, were observed. This study may provide new insight into treating AF with NOACs.

Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin and the risk for incident diabetes among patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a common comorbidity of atrial fibrillation (AF), which can complicate the management of AF. The pharmacology of oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been implicated in pathogenesis of diabetes, but the relationship between different OACs and risk of diabetes remains unexamined. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of diabetes with use of different OACs in AF patients. METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study using an electronic healthcare database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Patients newly diagnosed with AF from 2014 through 2018 and prescribed OACs were included and followed till December 31, 2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score (PS) is used to address potential bias due to nonrandomized allocation of treatment. The risks ofdiabetes were compared between different new OAC users using propensity score-weighted cumulative incidence differences (CID). RESULTS: There were 13,688 new users of OACs (warfarin: n = 3454; apixaban: n = 3335; dabigatran: n = 4210; rivaroxaban: n = 2689). The mean age was 75.0 (SD, 11.2), and 6,550 (47.9%) were women. After a median follow-up of 0.93 years (interquartile range, 0.21-1.92 years), 698 incident diabetes cases were observed. In Cox-regression analysis, dabigatran use was significantly associated with reduced risk of diabetes when compared with warfarin use [HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.86; P < 0.001)], with statistically insignificant associations observed for use of apixaban and rivaroxaban. The corresponding adjusted CIDs at 2 years after treatment with apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban users when compared with warfarin were - 2.06% (95% CI - 4.08 to 0.16%); - 3.06% (95% CI - 4.79 to - 1.15%); and - 1.8% (- 3.62 to 0.23%). In head-to-head comparisons between women DOAC users, dabigatran was also associated with a lower risk of diabetes when compared with apixaban and rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with AF receiving OACs, the use of dabigatran had the lowest risk of diabetes when compared with warfarin use.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants May Increase Their Benefit-Risk Ratio.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

Outcome of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in the treatment of left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Data comparing dabigatran with rivaroxaban regarding the resolution of left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs rivaroxaban regarding the resolution of LA/LAA thrombus in patients with nonvalvular AF. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled nonvalvular AF patients scheduled to undergo catheter ablation or cardioversion in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2014 and January 2019. Altogether, 34 patients with LA/LAA thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were enrolled. Among them, 12 patients were treated with dabigatran 150 mg bid and the other 22 with rivaroxaban 20 mg qd. Follow-up TEE was performed within greater than or equal to 3 weeks to less than 6 months of the initial TEE to evaluate the resolution of the LA/LAA thrombus. RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. Overall, 18 patients (81.8%) in the rivaroxaban group had complete thrombus resolution after 70.3 ± 22.1 treatment days, and 10 patients (83.3%) in the dabigatran group had complete thrombus resolution after 69.3 ± 47.9 treatment days. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .6). TEE showed that the average length, width, and area of thrombus significantly decreased in both groups after treatment, although there was no significant difference in the amount of change in these parameters between the two groups after treatment (P = .6). Undissolved thrombus in two patients in the rivaroxaban group did dissolve after switching to dabigatran. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are potential options for treating LA/LAA thrombus in patients with nonvalvular AF. Dabigatran could be an alternative option for the resolution of LA/LAA thrombus resistant to rivaroxaban.

Activated clotting time on the day of atrial fibrillation ablation for minimally interrupted and uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulation therapy: Sequential changes, differences among direct oral anticoagulants, and ablation safety outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization is used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Differences in sensitivity to ACT assays have been identified among different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine ACT just before ablation (pre-ACT) for different ablation start times (9:00, 11:00, 13:00, or 15:00) and ablation safety outcomes in minimally interrupted (min-Int) and uninterrupted (Unint) DOAC regimens and examine differences in pre-ACT values among four DOACs. METHODS: Consecutive patients were randomized into the min-Int (n = 307) or Unint (n = 277) groups. DOACs examined were apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. RESULTS: No sequential changes in pre-ACT values were observed for each DOAC used and for all four DOACs combined in the min-Int and Unint groups. There was no meaningful difference in pre-ACT at each ablation start time between the groups. Clinically significant differences in overall pre-ACT were not obtained between the groups (138 ± 24 vs 142 ± 23 seconds). The pre-ACT (baseline) value for dabigatran was on average 29 seconds higher than that for the other three DOACs. The min-Int and Unint groups showed similar thromboembolic (0% vs 0%) and bleeding event rates (major, 1% vs 0%; all, 3.5% vs 2.5%). CONCLUSION: The pre-ACT did not show a sequential change in the min-Int and Unint groups. No notable differences in the time-dependent change in pre-ACT between the groups were observed. Variations in baseline ACT suggest the need for moderate adjustment of ACT for adequate modification of heparin dose for the other three DOACs. Both regimens provided similar acceptable AF ablation safety outcomes.

Antithrombin supplementation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: study protocol for a pilot randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Normal levels of plasma antithrombin (AT) activity might decrease heparin requirements to achieve an adequate level of anticoagulation during treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Acquired AT deficiency during ECMO is common, but formal recommendations on target, timing, and rate of AT supplementation are lacking. Thus, we conceived a pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility and safety of prolonged AT supplementation in patients requiring veno-venous ECMO for respiratory failure. METHODS: Grifols Antithrombin Research Awards (GATRA) is a prospective, randomized, single blinded, multicenter, controlled two-arm trial. Patients undergoing veno-venous ECMO will be randomized to either receive AT supplementation to maintain a functional AT level between 80 and 120% (AT supplementation group) or not (control group) for the entire ECMO course. In both study groups, anticoagulation will be provided with unfractionated heparin following a standardized protocol. The primary endpoint will be the dose of heparin required to maintain the ratio of activated partial thromboplastin time between 1.5 and 2. Secondary endpoints will be the adequacy of anticoagulation and the incidence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. DISCUSSION: GATRA is a pilot trial that will test the efficacy of a protocol of AT supplementation in decreasing the heparin dose and improving anticoagulation adequacy during ECMO. If positive, it might provide the basis for a future larger trial aimed at verifying the impact of AT supplementation on a composite outcome endpoint including hemorrhagic events, transfusion requirements, and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03208270 . Registered on 5 July 2017.

Extended treatment with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins in cancer patients following venous thromboembolism. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the drug of choice for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), however non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) seem to be a reasonable alternative. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NOAC versus LMWH in patients with a history of CAT. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study 128 consecutive patients with active cancer who experienced CAT were enrolled following LMWH treatment for ≥3 months. Symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding and death were recorded during follow-up. RESULTS: 65 (50.8%) patients were switched to NOAC and 63 (49.2%) continued with LMWH. During a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range, 15-21) months, recurrent VTE was observed in 6 (9.2%) patients on NOAC and in 12 (19.0%) on LMWH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.16). The rate of major bleeding was 9.2% and 4.8%, respectively (HR 2.00, 95% CI 0.50-8.00). The median time to bleeding was shorter in patients on NOAC (3 [2.25-5.5] months) versus on LMWH (9 [6.5-13.0] months). The mortality rates were similar in both groups (15.4% versus 15.9%, respectively, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.32-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: In patients following CAT, extended treatment with NOAC, compared with LMWH, appears to be associated with similar effectiveness and safety.

Individual Treatment Effect Estimation of 2 Doses of Dabigatran on Stroke and Major Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to estimate absolute benefit and harm from treatment with dabigatran in individual patients with atrial fibrillation, and to select the optimal dose for each individual. METHODS: We derived and validated a prediction model for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation from the 3 treatment arms of the RE-LY trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy With Dabigatran Etexilate) (n=11 955 in derivation cohort, n=6158 in validation cohort). Readily available patient characteristics were included in Fine and Gray competing risk models (sex, age, smoking, antiplatelet drugs, previous vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and hemoglobin). Five-year risks for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were estimated without anticoagulation therapy, and compared with high- and low-dose dabigatran. RESULTS: Model calibration was good, and discrimination was adequate with a c-statistic of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70) for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71) for major bleeding. The 5-year absolute risk reduction for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily ranged from <10% in 20% of patients to >25% in 14% of patients, and the 5-year absolute risk increase for major bleeding ranged from <5% in 53% of patients to 15% to 20% in 1% of patients. Comparing high-dose to low-dose dabigatran, the net benefit (absolute risk reduction minus absolute risk increase) was positive for 46% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute treatment benefits and harms of dabigatran in atrial fibrillation can be estimated based on readily available patient characteristics. Such treatment effect estimations can be used for shared decision making before starting dabigatran treatment and to determine the optimal dose. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

[Management of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants: update on reversal strategies]. / Manejo de hemorragia asociada a anticoagulantes orales directos: estado actual de las estrategias de reversión.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Antithrombotic Agents.

Recent advances in our understanding of the contribution of thrombin generation to arterial thrombosis and the role of platelets in venous thrombosis have prompted new treatment paradigms. Nonetheless, bleeding remains the major side effect of such treatments spurring the quest for new antithrombotic regimens with better benefit-risk profiles and for safer anticoagulants for existing and new indications. The aims of this article are to review the results of recent trials aimed at enhancing the benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic therapy and explain how these findings are changing our approach to the management of arterial and venous thrombosis. Focusing on these 2 aspects of thrombosis management, this article discusses 4 advances: (1) the observation that in some indications, lowering the dose of some direct oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of bleeding without compromising efficacy, (2) the recognition that aspirin is not only effective for secondary prevention of atherothrombosis but also for prevention of venous thromboembolism, (3) the finding that dual pathway inhibition with the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban to attenuate thrombin generation plus aspirin to reduce thromboxane A2-mediated platelet activation is superior to aspirin or rivaroxaban alone for prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, and (4) the development of inhibitors of factor XI or XII as potentially safer anticoagulants.

Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been increasingly prescribed in clinical practice for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct comparisons between NOACs in trials are lacking, leaving an important clinical decision-making gap. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence of observational studies for direct comparative effectiveness and safety amongst NOACs in patients with AF. Conference proceedings and electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PUBMED were systematically searched. We included observational studies directly comparing individual NOACs in patients with nonvalvular AF who were aged ≥ 18 years for stroke prevention. Primary outcome included effectiveness outcome (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety outcome (major bleeding). Data were extracted in duplicated by two reviewers independently. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the data from included observational studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the overall quality of evidence for each outcome. Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis, twelve studies for meta-analyses. It was found that rivaroxaban and dabigatran were similar with regard to risk of stroke or systemic embolism (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10; evidence quality: low), but rivaroxaban was associated with higher risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.50; evidence quality: moderate). Compared with apixaban, a significantly higher risk of major bleeding was observed with rivaroxaban (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.51-1.94; evidence quality: low). Apixaban was associated with lower risk of major bleeding, in comparison with dabigatran (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95; evidence quality: low). No differences in risk of stroke or systemic embolism was observed between rivaroxaban versus apixaban, and apixaban versus dabigatran. In this study, apixaban was found to have the most favorable safety profile amongst the three NOACs. No significant difference was observed in risk of stroke or systemic embolism between the NOACs. Such findings may provide some decision-making support for physicians regarding their choices amongst NOACs in patients with AF.Registration PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42016052908).

Manejo de hemorragia asociada a anticoagulantes orales directos: estado actual de las estrategias de reversión / Management of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants: update on reversal strategies

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Aqueous Extract of Taegeuk Ginseng Inhibits Platelet Aggregation and Thrombus Formation.

The inhibitory effects of taegeuk ginseng extract (TGE) on platelet aggregation and thrombus formation were investigated. The TGE significantly inhibited collagen- and adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. Also oral administration of TGE to rats significantly prevented ADP- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation ex vivo, but it did not affect the plasma coagulation system. The oral administration of TGE significantly delayed the occlusion of the carotid artery in ferrous chloride-treated rats in vivo. These results suggest that in vivo antithrombotic effect of TGE may be due to its inhibitory activity on platelet aggregation rather than on plasma coagulation.

Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Catalán de Trombosis (Tromboc@t Working Group) para el tratamiento de los pacientes que reciben anticoagulantes orales directos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as well as for prevention and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Pivotal trials have demonstrated non-inferiority and potential superiority compared to warfarin, which increases the options of anticoagulant treatment. In our setting, the Anticoagulant Treatment Units (ATUs) and Primary Care Centres (PCCs) play an important role in the education, follow-up, adherence control and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients. These considerations have motivated us to elaborate the present consensus document that aims to establish clear recommendations that incorporate the findings of scientific research into clinical practice to improve the quality of care in the field of anticoagulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of experts from the Catalan Thrombosis Group (TROMBOC@T) reviewed all published literature from 2009 to 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. RESULTS: As a result of the project, a set of practical recommendations have been established that will facilitate treatment, education, follow-up and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients with ACODs. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive increase in the use of DOACs calls for measures to establish and homogenise clinical management guidelines for patients anticoagulated with DOACs in ATUs and PCCs.

Left atrial thrombus and dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in patients on continuous direct oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial thrombus (LAT) and dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients on continuous direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) therapy before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) have been described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare rates of TEE-detected LAT and dense SEC among patients taking different DOACs. METHODS: We evaluated 609 consecutive patients from 3 tertiary hospitals (median age 65 years; interquartile range 58-71 years; 436 (72%) men) who were on ≥4 weeks of continuous DOAC therapy (dabigatran, n = 166 [27%]; rivaroxaban, n = 257 [42%]; or apixaban, n = 186 [31%]) undergoing TEE before catheter ablation of AF/AFL. Demographic, clinical, and TEE data were collected for each patient. RESULTS: Despite ≥4 weeks of continuous DOAC therapy, 17 patients (2.8%) had LAT and 15 patients (2.5%) had dense SEC detected by TEE. The rates of LAT were 3.0%, 3.5%, and 1.6% for patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively (P = .482). The rates of dense SEC were 1.2%, 3.5%, and 2.2% for patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively (P = .299). Congestive heart failure (odds ratio 4.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-12; P = .003) and moderate/severe left atrial enlargement (odds ratio 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1-8.6; P = .026) were independent predictors of LAT. CONCLUSION: In this study, ∼3% of patients on continuous DOAC therapy had LAT detected before catheter ablation of AF/AFL. Specific DOAC therapy did not significantly affect the rates of LAT detection.

Evaluation of indications for reduced-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in hospitalised patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of thromboembolic complications is a priority in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is more common and some patients have indications for a reduced dose. AIM: We sought to evaluate the frequency of NOACs being prescribed to AF patients and to compare the groups of AF patients receiving standard and reduced doses. METHODS: The study included 1327 patients diagnosed with AF and hospitalised at an institution of the highest referral level in cardiology in the years 2015-2016. Final analysis encompassed 713 patients with nonvalvular AF, who were prescribed NOACs upon discharge. RESULTS: In the group of patients receiving NOACs, standard doses were used in 383 (53.7%) patients, while 330 (46.3%) patients received reduced doses. Among patients treated with reduced doses, dabigatran was prescribed to 186 (56.4%) patients, rivaroxaban to 124 (37.5%) patients, and apixaban to 20 (6.1%) patients. Absence of indications for dose reduction was identified in 54 out of 330 (16.4%) patients receiving reduced-dose NOACs, including six out of 20 patients receiving reduced-dose apixaban (30%), 21 out of 186 patients receiving reduced-dose dabigatran (11.3%), and 24 out of 124 pa-tients receiving reduced-dose rivaroxaban (19.3%). Among patients treated with reduced dose of dabigatran (n = 186), one indication for dose reduction was observed in 75 patients, and at least two indications were observed in 90 patients. One indication was observed in 71 patients, and at least two indications were observed in 30 patients treated with a reduced dose of rivaroxaban (n = 124). CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of NOACs were prescribed to most hospitalised AF patients. Apixaban was prescribed more frequently in the reduced-dose regimen, while the frequencies of standard and reduced doses prescribed were similar for dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Absence of indications for dose reduction as defined in relevant guidelines and Summaries of Product Characteristics was identified in 15.5% of patients receiving reduced doses of NOACs. More than one indication for dose reduction was identified in most patients receiving reduced-dose dabigatran, while one indication was identified in most patients receiving reduced-dose rivaroxaban.

Direct oral anticoagulants: An update. / Anticoagulantes orales directos: puesta al día.

Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs.

[Clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants attended in primary care setting. The SILVER-AP study]. / Perfil clínico de pacientes con fibrilación auricular tratados con anticoagulantes orales de acción directa atendidos en atención primaria. Estudio SILVER-AP.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the clinical characteristics and management of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional and multicentre study. LOCATION: Autonomous Communities in which the general practitioner can prescribe DOAC (n=9). PARTICIPANTS: The study included a total of 790 patients on chronic treatment with anticoagulants, and on whom therapy was changed, as well as being currently on treatment with DOAC for at least for 3 months. MAIN MEASURES: A record was made of the sociodemographic and clinical management date. RESULTS: Mean age was 78.6±8.4 years, and 50.5% of patients were men. Mean CHADS2 score was 2.6±1.2, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3±1.6, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 2.3±1.0. Mean duration of treatment with DOAC was 15.8±12.5 months. Rivaroxaban was the DOAC most frequently prescribed (57.8%), followed by dabigatran (23.7%), and apixaban (18.5%). Of the patients receiving rivaroxaban, 70.2% were taking the dose of 20mg/daily. Of the patients receiving dabigatran, 41.7% were taking the dose of 150mg twice daily, and in the case of apixaban, 56.2% were taking the dose of 5mg twice daily. Satisfaction (ACTS Burdens scale 52.0±7.2 and ACTS Benefits scale 12.1±2.2), and therapeutic adherence (97.8% of patients took their medication regularly) with DOAC were high. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with DOAC in Spain have a high thromboembolic risk. A significant proportion of patients receive a lower dose of DOAC than that recommended according to their clinical profile. Satisfaction and medication adherence are high.

Prescribing of NOACs has outnumbered warfarin: exploring how physicians choose anticoagulant treatments.

PURPOSE: The development of non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is a new alternative to treatment with warfarin. The purpose of this study was to explore drug prescription decisions of NOACs or warfarin from hospital physicians in cardiovascular departments. METHODS: A qualitative study with focus group interviews was conducted in three different hospitals. The interview guide explored the background of prescribing anticoagulants (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) and experiences with effect and side-effects they had observed in patients. RESULTS: The systematic text condensation eluded four main themes: when to prescribe NOACs, concern about side-effects, pharmaceutical properties and patient adherence, and prescribing policy and intra-professional communication. All available anticoagulants were prescribed. However, no specific NOAC was preferred. Factors perceived as contraindications for NOACs varied among the doctors. Most had observed side-effects of NOACs; however, these rarely influenced prescribing decisions due to small differences in safety profiles. Few drug-drug interactions and fixed daily doses made NOACs easy to prescribe; but some doctors had experienced lack of drug effect for some patients. Non-adherence with NOACs was harder to spot. Some different prescribing cultures had evolved between the different hospitals and between general practitioners. CONCLUSION: The hospital physicians chose anticoagulants based on patient conditions as renal function, bleeding risks, and drug interactions being the most common taken into account. They could not say which NOAC was best, and wish that future studies could compare the different NOACs, and not just compare with warfarin.