Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Tradicionales
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anaesthesia ; 77(3): 264-276, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34647323

RESUMEN

Despite the acknowledged injustice and widespread existence of parachute research studies conducted in low- or middle-income countries by researchers from institutions in high-income countries, there is currently no pragmatic guidance for how academic journals should evaluate manuscript submissions and challenge this practice. We assembled a multidisciplinary group of editors and researchers with expertise in international health research to develop this consensus statement. We reviewed relevant existing literature and held three workshops to present research data and holistically discuss the concept of equitable authorship and the role of academic journals in the context of international health research partnerships. We subsequently developed statements to guide prospective authors and journal editors as to how they should address this issue. We recommend that for manuscripts that report research conducted in low- or middle-income countries by collaborations including partners from one or more high-income countries, authors should submit accompanying structured reflexivity statements. We provide specific questions that these statements should address and suggest that journals should transparently publish reflexivity statements with accepted manuscripts. We also provide guidance to journal editors about how they should assess the structured statements when making decisions on whether to accept or reject submitted manuscripts. We urge journals across disciplines to adopt these recommendations to accelerate the changes needed to halt the practice of parachute research.


Asunto(s)
Autoria/normas , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Políticas Editoriales , Salud Global/normas , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/normas , África , Australia , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Salud Global/tendencias , Humanos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/tendencias , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Reino Unido
2.
Midwifery ; 31(10): e100, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24997692
4.
Trials ; 15: 429, 2014 Nov 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25373427

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess the endorsement of reporting guidelines in Korean traditional medicine (TM) journals by reviewing their instructions to authors. We examined the instructions to authors in all of the TM journals published in Korea to assess the appropriate use of reporting guidelines for research studies. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published after 2010 in journals that endorsed reporting guidelines were obtained. The reporting quality was assessed using the following guidelines: the 38-item Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for non-pharmacological trials (NPT); the 17-item Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) statement, instead of the 5-item CONSORT for acupuncture trials; and the 22-item CONSORT extensions for herbal medicine trials. The overall item score was calculated and expressed as a proportion.One journal that endorsed reporting guidelines was identified. Twenty-nine RCTs published in this journal after 2010 met the selection criteria. General editorial policies such as those of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) were endorsed by 15 journals. In each of the CONSORT-NPT articles, 21.6 to 56.8% of the items were reported, with an average of 11.3 items (29.7%) being reported. In the 24 RCTs (24/29, 82.8%) appraised using the STRICTA items, an average of 10.6 items (62.5%) were addressed, with a range of 41.2 to 100%. For the herbal intervention reporting, 17 items (77.27%) were reported. In the RCT studies before and after the endorsement of CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines by each journal, all of the STRICTA items had significant improvement, whereas the CONSORT-NPT items improved without statistical significance.The endorsement of reporting guidelines is limited in the TM journals in Korea. Authors should adhere to the reporting guidelines, and editorial departments should refer authors to the various reporting guidelines to improve the quality of their articles.


Asunto(s)
Políticas Editoriales , Medicina Tradicional Coreana , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Autoria/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Guías como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Control de Calidad , República de Corea
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA