Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data are needed to inform the positioning of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, both first line and after previous biologic exposure. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials done in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23p40, or anti-IL23p19 agents, either alone or in combination with immunosuppressants, as their first-line biologic or after previous biologic exposure, compared with placebo or an active comparator. The minimum duration of therapy was 14 days for trials reporting induction of remission in active disease and 22 weeks in trials reporting maintenance of remission. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, trial registries, and unpublished data from inception to June 3, 2021, without any language restrictions. Summary estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from the published reports; individual patient-level data were not sought. The primary endpoint was induction of clinical remission in patients with active disease (CDAI <150) and maintenance of remission in patients with response to induction therapy, with data extracted from published reports. A network meta-analysis with multivariate consistency model random-effects meta-regression was done, with rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. FINDINGS: The search strategy yielded 18 382 citations, of which 31 trials were eligible for inclusion. On the basis of 15 randomised controlled trials including 2931 biologic-naive patients, infliximab monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4·53 [95% CI 1·49-13·79]), infliximab combined with azathioprine (7·49 [2·04-27·49]), adalimumab (3·01 [1·25-7·27]), and ustekinumab (2·63 [1·10-6·28]) were associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission compared to certolizumab pegol (all moderate confidence); infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab (3·76 [1·01-14·03]; low confidence). On the basis of ten randomised controlled trials including 2479 patients with previous biologic exposure, adalimumab after loss of response to infliximab (OR 2·82 [95% CI 1·20-6·62]; low confidence), and risankizumab (2·10 [1·12-3·92]; moderate confidence), were associated with higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab. No differences between active interventions were observed in maintenance trials. Most trials were at low or uncertain risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Although biologic treatment choices in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease must be individualised for each patient, this analysis suggests that either infliximab with azathioprine or adalimumab might be preferred as a first-line therapy, and adalimumab (after infliximab loss of response) or risankizumab might be preferred as a second-line therapy, for induction of clinical remission. FUNDING: None.

Ustekinumab is more effective than azathioprine to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Preventing postoperative recurrence (POR) is a major concern in Crohn's disease (CD). While azathioprine is an option, no data is available on ustekinumab efficacy in this situation. AIMS: We compared the effectiveness of ustekinumab versus azathioprine in preventing endoscopic POR in CD. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive CD patients treated with ustekinumab after intestinal resection in 9 centers. The control group (azathioprine alone) was composed of patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial conducted in the same centers comparing azathioprine alone or in combination with curcumin. Propensity score analyses (inversed probability of treatment weighting = IPTW) were applied to compare the two groups. The primary endpoint was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2) at 6 months. RESULTS: Overall, 32 patients were included in the ustekinumab group and 31 in the azathioprine group. The propensity score analysis was adjusted on the main risk factors (smoking, fistulizing phenotype, prior bowel resection, resection length >30 cm and ≥2 biologics before surgery) and thiopurines or ustekinumab exposure prior to surgery making the two arms comparable (∣d∣ < 0.2). After IPTW, the rate of endoscopic POR at 6 months was lower in patients treated with ustekinumab compared to azathioprine (28.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.029). After IPTW, the rates of i2b-endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i2b) and severe endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts' index ≥ i3) were 20.8% versus 42.5% (p = 0.066) and 16.9% versus 27.9% (p = 0.24), in the ustekinumab and azathioprine groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab seemed to be more effective than azathioprine in preventing POR in this cohort of CD patients.

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Heritiera littoralis Fruits on Dextran Sulfate Sodium- (DSS-) Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice by Regulating Gut Microbiota and Suppressing NF-κB Pathway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chemical compositions of EFH were identified using LC-ESI-MS. The mice with 3% DSS-induced UC were administered EFH (200, 400, and 800 mg/kg), sulfasalazine (SASP, 200 mg/kg), and azathioprine (AZA, 13 mg/kg) for 10 days via daily gavage. The colonic inflammation was evaluated by the disease activity index (DAI), colonic length, histological scores, and levels of inflammatory mediators. The gut microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis. RESULTS: LC-ESI-MS analysis showed that EFH was rich in alkaloids and flavones. The results indicated that EFH significantly improved the DAI score, relieved colon shortening, and repaired pathological colonic variations in colitis. In addition, proteins in the NF-κB pathway were significantly inhibited by EFH. Furthermore, EFH recovered the diversity and balance of the gut microbiota. CONCLUSIONS: EFH has protective effects against DSS-induced colitis by keeping the balance of the gut microbiota and suppressing the NF-κB pathway.

COVID-19 pandemic and biological therapy in rheumatologic disorders: how to deal with?

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has involved more than 159 countries and more than 5 million people worldwide. A 40-year-old man with a history of rheumatoid arthritis treated with prednisolone, Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), and biologic agents was admitted with chief complaints of fever, chills, malaise, myalgia, and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography showed bilateral subsegmental atelectasis and diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs inducing the suspicion of COVID-19 infection. The oro-nasopharynx swab sample for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction was positive. In addition to supportive care, lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily and oseltamivir (75 mg) twice daily were started in combination with a starting dose of hydroxychloroquine (400 mg). The methotrexate dose was decreased, and the dose of prednisolone was increased to 30 mg for 10 days. Azathioprine and adalimumab were continued at previous doses. The use of biologic agents and DMARDs in rheumatic patients is a serious challenge in the COVID-19 pandemic. In conclusion, during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the key roles of cytokines in the promotion of the disease, the rheumatic patients may benefit from continuing their previous treatment, which may have protective effects.

What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2016. Part 1: treatment and prevention.

This review is part of a series of annual updates summarizing the evidence base for atopic eczema (AE). It provides a summary of key findings from 28 systematic reviews that were published or indexed during 2016 with a focus on treatment and prevention of AE. There is reasonable evidence of benefit for topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, a glycyrrhetinic acid-containing preparation (Atopiclair® ), oral ciclosporin, oral azathioprine, narrowband ultraviolet B radiation and education programmes. Overall, there is evidence that topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have similar efficacy and that both can prevent AE flares when used twice weekly as maintenance therapy. However, topical calcineurin inhibitors are costlier and have more adverse reactions, thus topical corticosteroids should remain the standard of care for patients with AE. There is no evidence that multiple applications are better than once-daily application of topical corticosteroid. There is inconsistent evidence to support omalizumab and specific allergen immunotherapy use in AE. There is some evidence that vitamin D supplementation and synbiotics reduce AE severity, although the margin of improvement may not be clinically meaningful. There is little evidence to support the use of wet wraps or of complementary/alternative medicine (including Chinese herbal medicine). There is some evidence to suggest that a diet high in fish in infancy may be preventative for AE, but other dietary interventions for the prevention of AE show little promise. This review provides a succinct guide for clinicians and patients wishing to remain up to date with the latest evidence for the treatment and prevention of AE.

Grand round: Autoimmune hepatitis.

Autoimmune hepatitis is a corticosteroid-responsive liver disease arising consequent to immunogenetic and environmental risk factors. The clinical course reflects relapsing and remitting, hepatocyte targeted immunologic damage, which is countered by reparative responses to cell injury. Appropriate and timely immunosuppressive therapy drives the disease into remission, albeit with inevitable side effects. Many challenges faced in the clinic reflect practice that must capture a heterogeneous disease presentation, course, and treatment response, as well as treatment tolerability. In this Grand Round we appraise the evidence supporting current treatment approaches, address the impact of autoimmune liver disease 'crossover or overlap' presentations, explore important clinical correlates to immune-serological classifiers, and discuss the factors influencing choice of alternative therapy in difficult-to-treat situations.

Analytical and Sample Preparation Protocol for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of 12 Thiopurine Metabolites Related to Clinical Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Thiopurines (TP) represent an important therapeutic tool for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in the current situation of rising incidence and health care costs. The results of multiple clinical studies aimed at finding correlations between levels of TP metabolites and response of IBD patients to the treatment are, however, often controversial due to variability in analytical and sample preparation procedures among these studies. In this work, therefore, an updated analytical and sample preparation procedure for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of TP metabolites in blood samples obtained from patients with IBD was proposed to establish a unified protocol. An advanced analytical method based on ion-exchange liquid chromatography hyphenated with tandem mass spectrometry (IEC-ESI-MS/MS) was used for the determination of the profiles of 12 individual TP metabolites in the particular steps of sample preparation procedure including blood collection, red blood cells (RBC) isolation, lysis, and storage. Favorable performance parameters of the IEC-ESI-MS/MS method (LLOQs 1⁻10 nmol/L, accuracy 95⁻105%, intra-day and inter-day precision < 10%, selectivity demonstrated via no sample matrix interferences) and acceptable stability (peak area fluctuations < 15%) of clinical samples under the proposed sample preparation conditions {(i) EDTA anticoagulant tube for the blood collection; (ii) 4 °C and 4 h between the sample collection and RBC isolation; (iii) phosphate-buffered saline for RBC washing and re-suspendation; (iv) -20 °C for RBC lysis and short-term storage; (v) 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 10 mmol/L DTT as a stabilizing medium for TPN in RBC lysates} demonstrated the suitability of such protocol for a well-defined and reliable routine use in studies on thiopurines TDM.

Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. METHODS: Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. RESULTS: Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). CONCLUSION: Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.

Eficacia y seguridad de rituximab en combinación con azatioprina o Mofetil micofenolato en pacientes adultos con diagnóstico de pénfigo refractario y con contraindicación a uso de corticoides por eventos adversos serios / Efficacy and safety of rituximab for the treatment of patients younger than 18 years with autoimmune encephalitis refractory to first-line therapy (immunoglobulin, corticoid pulses and plasmapheresis)

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI) ha recibido la solicitud de evaluar el uso del medicamento Rituximab (RTX) administrado en asociación a azatioprina o mofetil micofenolato (MMF) en pacientes con pénfigo seborreico refractario y con contraindicaciones para el uso de corticoides por eventos adversos serios, indicación actualmente no contemplada en el petitorio de medicamentos. Aspectos Generales: El pénfigo es un grupo de enfermedades ampulosas autoinmunes raras caracterizado por formación de ampollas y erosiones extensas en la piel y las mucosas. El pénfigo aparece comúnmente en la edad adulta, su distribución es igual entre hombres y mujeres, y ocurre en todas las razas aunque se le ha encontrado asociado a algunos alelos del HLA clase II (Tron 2005), los cuales son moléculas heredadas relacionadas con la respuesta inmune. Fisiopatológicamente, las ampollas se producen debido a la presencia de auto-anticuerpos IgG contra la desmogleina 1 y 3 de los queratinocitos, las cuales son proteínas de adhesión localizadas en la parte superior e inferior de la epidermis respectivamente. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Rituximab: RTX es un anticuerpo citolítico anti CD20. RTX se une al receptor del CD20 induciendo la disminución de células B in vitro. La molécula CD20 se expresa específicamente en la superficie de los linfocitos B durante su diferenciación desde células pre-B a células B maduras. El dominio Fab de RTX se une al antígeno CD20 de los linfocitos B, y el dominio Fc favorece funciones inmunes para mediar la lisis de las células B. Los posibles mecanismos de la lisis celular incluyen la citotoxicidad mediada por el sistema del complemento y mediada por anticuerpos (FDA). METODOLOGÍA: Estrategia de Búsqueda: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de la evidencia científica con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de RTX en terapia combinada con azatioprina o MMFen pacientes con diagnóstico de pénfigo eritematoso refractario o con contraindicaciones para el uso de corticoides en las bases de datos MEDLINE, EMBASE y Translating research into practice (TRIPDATABASE), así como dentro de la información generada por grupos que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, tales como The Cochrane Library, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), The National Guideline for Clearinghouse (NGC) and The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Los desenlaces clínicos a evaluar fueron mortalidad, remisión sostenida (definida como control de la enfermedad por más de 6 meses), calidad de vida, reacciones adversas, y disminución de la dosis de medicamentos coadyuvantes. Se hizo una búsqueda adicional en www.clinicaltrials.qov, para poder identificar ensayos clínicos en curso o que no hayan sido publicados. RESULTADOS: Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de RTX en terapia combinada con azatioprina o MMF en pacientes con diagnóstico de pénfigo foliáceo (incluyendo el eritematoso) refractario o con contraindicaciones para el uso de corticoides. No se encontró ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que evaluaran a RTX como tratamiento de pénfigo foliáceo con o sin comparación con azatioprina o MMF por lo que se ha incluido resultados de estudios observacionales. CONCLUSIONES: Hasta el momento, no se ha identificado evidencia directa para responder si el uso de RTX en terapia combinada con azatioprina o mofetil MMFes mas efectiva y segura que la terapia con azatioprina o mofetil MMFen pacientes con diagnóstico de pénfigo eritematoso refractario y con contraindicaciones para el uso de corticoides por eventos adversos serios. No se ha encontrado en la presente evaluación de tecnología sanitaria evidencia consistente que establezca cual es el beneficio neto atribuible al uso de RTX por sobre otros inmunosupresores en pacientes con pénfigo eritematoso refractario y con contraindicación de uso de CE por eventos adversos severos, considerando que a la fecha se disponen de otros inmunosupresores de tercera línea recomendados en las guías consensuadas del manejo de pénfigo. expuesto El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación-IETSI no aprueba el uso de RTX como una alternativa de tratamiento para pacientes con diagnóstico de pénfigo eritematoso refractario y con contraindicación a uso de CE por efectos adversos severos.

Time to Relapse in Children with Crohn's Disease Treated with Azathioprine and Nutritional Therapy or Corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: The duration of remission has been shown to be longer in patients initially treated with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) compared to corticosteroids (CS). However, no published studies required concurrent immunomodulator [6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine (AZA)] use at the time of diagnosis. AIMS: The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the duration of remission between patients initially treated with AZA in combination with CS or EEN and identify predictors of early relapse in these patients. METHODS: Data from 65 newly diagnosed children with CD in clinical remission on either EEN or CS and commencing AZA at diagnosis were included. We compared duration of remission using physician global assessment and carried out Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of early relapse. Patients were followed up to the time of first relapse or for at least 12 months. RESULTS: There were no differences in the duration of remission between patients initially treated with EEN or CS (p = 0.978). We identified younger age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95 CI 0.78-0.98, p = 0.016], lower height Z score at diagnosis (HR 0.61, 95 CI 0.44-0.85, p = 0.003), involvement of the upper gastrointestinal tract (HR 2.69, 95 CI 1.27-5.66, p = 0.009), and elevated platelet count at remission (HR 1.004, 95 CI 1.001-1.008, p = 0.021) as independent predictors of early relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Neither induction regime demonstrated longer duration of remission of CD in patients treated with immunomodulators since the time of diagnosis.

Systemic Agents for Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), or eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by relapsing pruritic, scaly, erythematous papules and plaques frequently associated with superinfection. The lifelong prevalence of AD is over 20 % in affluent countries. When a child with severe AD is not responding to optimized topical therapy including phototherapy, and relevant triggers cannot be identified or avoided, systemic therapy should be considered. If studies show early aggressive intervention can prevent one from advancing along the atopic march, and relevant triggers such as food allergies cannot be either identified or avoided, systemic therapy may also play a prophylactic role. Though the majority of evidence exists in adult populations, four systemic non-specific immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs have demonstrated efficacy in AD and are used in most patients requiring this level of intervention regardless of age: cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and azathioprine. This article reviews the use of these medications as well as several promising targeted therapies currently in development including dupilumab and apremilast. We briefly cover several other systemic interventions that have been studied in children with atopic dermatitis.

Azathioprine therapy selectively ablates human Vδ2⁺ T cells in Crohn's disease.

Tumor-derived and bacterial phosphoantigens are recognized by unconventional lymphocytes that express a Vγ9Vδ2 T cell receptor (Vδ2 T cells) and mediate host protection against microbial infections and malignancies. Vδ2 T cells are absent in rodents but readily populate the human intestine, where their function is largely unknown. Here, we assessed Vδ2 T cell phenotype and function by flow cytometry in blood and intestinal tissue from Crohn's disease patients (CD patients) and healthy controls. Blood from CD patients included an increased percentage of gut-tropic integrin ß7-expressing Vδ2 T cells, while "Th1-committed" CD27-expressing Vδ2 T cells were selectively depleted. A corresponding population of CD27+ Vδ2 T cells was present in mucosal biopsies from CD patients and produced elevated levels of TNFα compared with controls. In colonic mucosa from CD patients, Vδ2 T cell production of TNFα was reduced by pharmacological blockade of retinoic acid receptor-α (RARα) signaling, indicating that dietary vitamin metabolites can influence Vδ2 T cell function in inflamed intestine. Vδ2 T cells were ablated in blood and tissue from CD patients receiving azathioprine (AZA) therapy, and posttreatment Vδ2 T cell recovery correlated with time since drug withdrawal and inversely correlated with patient age. These results indicate that human Vδ2 T cells exert proinflammatory effects in CD that are modified by dietary vitamin metabolites and ablated by AZA therapy, which may help resolve intestinal inflammation but could increase malignancy risk by impairing systemic tumor surveillance.

Methotrexate is an efficient therapeutic alternative in children with thiopurine-resistant Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the role of methotrexate (MTX) in the maintenance of clinical remission and mucosal healing in children with Crohn's disease (CD), in whom azathioprine (AZA) treatment failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study which included all children who were diagnosed with CD during a period of 10 years and who received MTX for ≥12 months after failed AZA treatment. Remission was assessed clinically, defined by Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index as a score of ≤10 and no need for the reintroduction of the remission induction therapy. In the subset of patients with sustained clinical remission, the rate of mucosal healing was endoscopically assessed. Endoscopic lesions were assessed by Simple Endoscopic Score for CD. Each patient served as his or her own historical control. RESULTS: Of the 32 included patients, 22 (68.7%) remained in the stable clinical remission after a period of 12 months and 14 (43.8%) did not experience relapse during the whole follow up (median duration 2.9 years; range 1-4.8 years). From all patients who were in clinical remission during the entire follow up (n = 14), endoscopy was performed in eight (57%) patients and showed complete mucosal healing macroscopically (Simple Endoscopic Score for CD score of 0) and microscopically in seven out of eight (87.5%) patients. CONCLUSION: MTX was found to be an efficient therapeutic alternative in the thiopurine-resistant patients, enabling the complete mucosal healing.

Weekly azathioprine pulse versus daily azathioprine in the treatment of Parthenium dermatitis: A non-inferiority randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine in daily doses has been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of Parthenium dermatitis. Weekly pulses of azathioprine (WAP) are also effective, but there are no reports comparing the effectiveness and safety of these two regimens in this condition. AIMS: To study the efficacy and safety of WAP and daily azathioprine in Parthenium dermatitis. METHODS: Sixty patients with Parthenium dermatitis were randomly assigned to treatment with azathioprine 300 mg weekly pulse or azathioprine 100 mg daily for 6 months. Patients were evaluated every month to assess the response to treatment and side effects. RESULTS: The study included 32 patients in the weekly azathioprine group and 28 in the daily azathioprine group, of whom 25 and 22 patients respectively completed the study. Twenty-three (92%) patients on WAP and 21 (96%) on daily azathioprine had a good or excellent response. The mean pretreatment clinical severity score decreased from 26.4±14.5 to 4.7±5.1 in the WAP group, and from 36.1±18.1 to 5.7±6.0 in the daily azathioprine group, which was statistically significant and comparable (P=0.366). Patients on WAP had a higher incidence of adverse effects (P=0.02). LIMITATIONS: The study had a small sample size and the amount of clobetasol propionate used in each patient was not determined, though it may not have affected the study outcome due to its comparable use in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine 300 mg weekly pulse and 100 mg daily dose are equally effective and safe in the treatment of Parthenium dermatitis.

Recent clinical trials in lupus nephritis.

Recent clinical trials have provided evidence for the efficacy of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis in comparative trials with standard-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Trials of maintenance treatments have had more variable results, but suggest that the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil may be similar to that of quarterly standard-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide and somewhat more efficacious than azathioprine. Differential responses to mycophenolate mofetil based on ethnicity suggest that it may be more effective in black and Hispanic patients. Rituximab was not efficacious as an adjunct to induction treatment with mycophenolate mofetil.

Evolution of cortical and thalamus atrophy and disability progression in early relapsing-remitting MS during 5 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pathologic changes in GM have an important role in MS. We investigated the association between SDGM and cortical volume changes and disability progression in early RRMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty patients with RRMS had clinical assessment during 5 years and were divided into those with or without SDP at 5 years by the usual definition in treatment trials. The number of available MR imaging scans at various time points was the following: at baseline, 178; and at 6 months, 172; at 12 months, 175; at 24 months, 155; at 36 months, 160; at 48 months, 158; and at 60 months, 162, respectively. Longitudinal changes in cortical, GM, and WM volume were calculated by using the direct method. RESULTS: At 5 years, 90 patients with RRMS experienced SDP and 90 had stable disease. At baseline, patients with SDP had longer disease duration, greater T2-lesion volume, and smaller whole-brain, WM, cortical, and SDGM volume (P < .01). At 5 years, patients with SDP had significantly greater percentage decreases from baseline compared with those without SDP in the volume of the whole brain (P < .0001), cortex (P = .001), GM (P = .003), and thalamus (P = .01). In patients who developed SDP at 5 years and those who did not, mixed-effect models, adjusted for age, disease duration, and change of the treatment status, showed significant interactions between SDP status at 5 years and changes with time in whole-brain, cortical, lateral ventricle (all P < .001), thalamus (P = .006), and total SDGM (P = .0095) volume. CONCLUSIONS: SDP is associated with progression of cortical, central, and thalamic atrophy in early RRMS during 5 years.

[Ustekinumab in a patient with Crohn's disease and anti-TNF-α-induced psoriasis]. / Ustekinumab en paciente con enfermedad de Crohn y psoriasis inducida por anti-TNF-α

Treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α for Crohn's disease is relatively safe, although various cutaneous adverse effects have been reported such as the development or exacerbation of anti-TNF- α-induced psoriasis, which can sometimes lead to treatment withdrawal. Therefore, new alternative treatments with new mechanisms of action are required. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against the p40 subunit of interleukin 12/23, could induce response in patients with Crohn's disease and has demonstrated efficacy in patients with psoriasis. We present the case of a woman with Crohn's disease who developed psoriasis after treatment with two anti-TNF- α drugs (infliximab and adalimumab). The patient was subsequently treated with ustekinumab with resolution or psoriasis lesions and maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease.

[Bullous pemphigoid: a review]. / Pemphigoïde bulleuse: revue de la littérature.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common auto-immune bullous disorder. Its treatment is difficult due to high age and comorbidities of affected patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of treatments for BP. METHODS: Randomized therapeutic trials (RCTs) were identified using an automatic search on Pubmed et Embase until March 2009. Large retrospective series with homogeneous therapeutic management were also selected and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were selected and analyzed, which included nine RCTs with a total of 1007 participants (653 patients were included in two trials). Two RCTs comparing different modalities of systemic corticosteroid therapy failed to show differences in measure of disease control. The addition of plasma exchanges (one RCT) or azathioprine (one RCT) allowed to halve the amount of prednisone required for disease control. A further 3-arms RCT compared plasma exchange or azathioprine plus prednisone, but failed to show significant differences for disease control or mortality of BP. One study compared tetracycline plus nicotinamide with prednisolone, no significant difference for disease response was evidenced. A large controlled clinical trial demonstrated that high doses of very potent topical corticosteroids increased initial disease control and 1-year survival of patients with extensive BP, as compared with oral prednisone. Another RCT compared two regimens of potent topical corticosteroids and a non-inferior rate of BP control was obtained with the mild regimen. Finally, a study comparing two immunosuppressant drugs (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) in addition to prednisone failed to show any difference for disease control, recurrence rate or the cumulated doses of prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrapotent topical corticosteroids (clobetasol propionate; 20 to 40g/day) are effective treatments for BP with fewer systemic side-effects than oral high-dose corticosteroids. Systemic corticosteroids are effective but doses greater than 0.5mg/kg per day are associated with severe side-effects, including decreased survival. The effectiveness of the addition of plasma exchange or immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) to systemic corticosteroids has not been established. Combination treatment with tetracycline and nicotinamide needs further validation.

Exacerbation of hereditary warfarin resistance by azathioprine.

A 39-year-old Afro-Caribbean man with Crohn disease with recurrent deep vein thromboses and pulmonary emboli was commenced on lifelong warfarin treatment. The patient required high-dose warfarin (>140 mg/wk), which increased further during azathioprine treatment. Cessation of azathioprine resulted in an increase in the international normalized ratio (INR). Mutation analysis identified a Val66Met substitution in vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1), consistent with severe warfarin resistance. This report is the first presentation where the patient had a defined hereditary resistance to warfarin, which was aggravated by concomitant azathioprine. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the interaction between warfarin and azathioprine, to monitor clinical response closely, and to manage the doses of both drugs accordingly.