Janus kinase inhibitors and the changing landscape of vitiligo management: a scoping review.

Vitiligo is a chronic skin condition caused by an autoimmune response that results in the progressive loss of melanocytes and recent studies have suggested that Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are emerging as a promising new treatment modality. Therefore, to assess and understand the extent of knowledge in the emerging field of JAKi use in vitiligo, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken. The reviewed articles explored a wide variety of JAKi administered either orally or topically for vitiligo. There were no injectable JAKi studied. Tofacitinib was the most commonly studied oral JAKi in 16 of the 35 studies selected for review, followed by baricitinib (n = 3), and one study each with ritlecitinib, ruxolitinib, and upadacitinib. Ruxolitinib (n = 6) and tofacitinib (n = 6) were the most often studied topical JAKi, followed by delgocitinib (n = 1). Potential benefits may vary between JAKi based on their receptor selectivity profile and coexistent autoimmune diseases. A topical JAKi would be advantageous in limited body area involvement and in adolescents. Concurrent use of JAKi with phototherapy or sun exposure appears beneficial. Most studies permitted the use of other topical agents. Acne-related events, though frequent yet mild, were reported with both oral and topical JAKi. Nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, and headaches were the most common adverse effects seen in the larger trials with JAKi. No serious or clinically meaningful hematology or thromboembolic events were detected. Treatment of vitiligo with oral or topical JAKi seems to be promising and the growing evidence shows a favorable risk-benefit profile.

Chronotherapy targeting cytokine secretion attenuates collagen-induced arthritis in mice.

OBJECTIVE: Diurnal variation of symptoms are observed in rheumatoid arthritis, especially in productions of cytokines that show peak concentrations during mid night. In contrast, cytokines of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice increase in daytimes under Mid-light condition. By using chronotherapy, differences in drug efficacies according to administration time of Baricitinib, a wide ranged cytokine blocker, were examined in CIA mice. METHODS: CIA mice were administered a dose of 3 mg/kg of Baricitinib once a day at zeitgeber time (ZT) 0 or ZT12 for 21 days. Arthritis scores, histopathology and factors related to joint destruction in sera were examined. Phosphorylation of STAT3 in liver, expressions of cytokines in spleen, and Interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in sera were measured. RESULTS: In CIA mice, diurnal variations were observed both in expressions of cytokines and phosphorylation of STAT3. Arthritis scores of ZT0/12 group decreased from day3 as compared to untreated mice, and those of ZT0 group significantly decreased as compared to ZT12 group from day12. Pathological findings, immunohistochemistry of cytokines and Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin ratio in sera well reflected results of arthritis scores. Diurnal variation of STAT3 phosphorylation was suppressed in ZT0 group. At ZT2, expressions of IL-6/Interferon-γ/TNF/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in ZT0 group were significantly decreased as compared to untreated mice, though not in ZT12 group. In ZT0 group, IL-6 and TNF-α in sera were decreased for longer time than that in ZT12 group. CONCLUSION: Chronotherapy using Baricitinib targeting cytokine secretions is effective in CIA mice. Clinical applications of chronotherapy can be expected to enhance the drug efficacy.

A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes in advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Although a myriad of novel treatments entered the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, there is lack of head-to-head evidence. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate each treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane to identify all phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a time frame from January 1, 2010 to March 11, 2019. We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evidence was synthesised using a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbazine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin. To increase homogeneity of the study populations, RCTs were only included if patients were not previously treated with novel treatments. RESULTS: The SLR identified 28 phase III RCTs involving 14,376 patients. Nineteen and seventeen treatments were included in the effectiveness and safety NMA, respectively. For PFS, dabrafenib plus trametinib (hazard ratio [HR] PFS: 0.21) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR PFS: 0.22) were identified as most favourable treatments. Both had, however, less favourable safety profiles. Five other treatments closely followed (dabrafenib [HR PFS: 0.30], nivolumab plus ipilimumab [HR PFS: 0.34], vemurafenib [HR PFS: 0.38], nivolumab [HR PFS: 0.42] and pembrolizumab [HR PFS: 0.46]). In contrast, for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR OS: 0.39), nivolumab (HR OS: 0.46) and pembrolizumab (HR OS: 0.50) were more favourable than dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR OS: 0.55) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR OS: 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Our NMA identified the most effective treatment options for advanced melanoma and provided valuable insights into each novel treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. This information may facilitate evidence-based decision-making and may support the optimisation of treatment and outcomes in everyday clinical practice.

Dietary implications for patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of oral anticoagulation therapy with warfarin (a vitamin K antagonist) in the treatment of thromboembolic disease, including stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation is well recognised. However, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window and an unpredictable anticoagulation response, which make it difficult to achieve and maintain optimal anticoagulation. Various dietary factors, including sudden changes in eating patterns, can significantly alter anticoagulation control, thereby potentially exposing patients to the risk of bleeding or thromboembolic complications. Dietary vitamin K intake is a particularly important factor, given the mechanism of action of warfarin. Areas covered: In this article, we cover the sources of vitamin K and their potential effect of dietary vitamin K on anticoagulation response to warfarin. We also discuss the results of studies on the effect of vitamin K supplementation on anticoagulation stability. Expert commentary: A stable dietary vitamin K, promoted by daily oral vitamin K supplementation, can improve anticoagulation stability in patients on warfarin therapy. There is experimental evidence in animals that dietary vitamin K affects anticoagulation response to the direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran. Whether dietary vitamin K affects anticoagulation response to the currently licensed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in man remains to be investigated.

Novel Oral Therapies for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.

Several classes of new oral therapy are in use or in development for the treatment of psoriasis. Despite the high efficacy of biologics, new oral therapies remain important as patients generally prefer this mode of administration and they offer an alternative risk-benefit profile. In this review, we discuss the novel modes of action of these drugs, including modulation of cellular pathways involving diverse targets such as Janus kinase, phosphodiesterase 4, sphingosine 1-phosphate, A3 adenosine receptor and rho-associated kinase 2. We review the available evidence around licensed drugs (apremilast) and drugs that are advanced (tofacitinib) or early (ponesimod, baricitinib, peficitinib, INCB039110, CF101, KD025) in the development pipeline. The key limitations of these oral therapies are their modest efficacy profile (apremilast, ponesimod) and the limitations of their safety profile (tofacitinib, ponesimod), while the evidence for the early pipeline drugs are at phase II level only. Potential niches of current unmet needs include apremilast for patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis, as combination treatments with biologic therapies, and/or for patients in whom multiple biologic therapies have failed due to immunogenicity and secondary inefficacy. The present knowledge gap regarding these novel drugs includes the need for longer clinical trials or observational studies to evaluate safety, and randomised phase III trials for the early pipeline drugs. We conclude that further research and data are necessary to conclusively establish the role of these agents in the current psoriasis treatment paradigm.

Effects of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Siponimod (BAF312) on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guideline mandates an intensive cardiac safety evaluation in a clinical thorough QT study, typically in healthy subjects, for all new non-antiarrhythmic drugs with systemic bioavailability. This thorough QT study investigated the effects of therapeutic (2 mg) and supratherapeutic (10 mg) doses of siponimod (BAF312) on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, multiple oral dose study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive siponimod (up-titration to 2 and 10 mg over 18 days), placebo (Days -1 to 18), or moxifloxacin 400 mg Days 10 and 18). Triplicate ECGs were extracted at prespecified time points from Holter ECGs recorded from 1 hour predose until 24 hours postdose at baseline and on-treatment assessment Days 10 and 18. The primary pharmacodynamic variable was the time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted mean QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) at steady-state conditions. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of siponimod and its main circulating metabolite M3 and its metabolite M5 were evaluated. FINDINGS: Of the 304 enrolled subjects, 281 (92.4%) were included in the pharmacodynamic analysis and 270 (88.8%) completed the study. The upper bounds of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcF at both siponimod doses were within the regulatory threshold of 10 milliseconds (ms) at all predefined on-treatment time points, with the absence of any dose-related effects. The highest observed upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CIs of 9.8 and 9.6 ms for therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively, were both observed at 3 hours postdose. No treatment-emergent QTc values >480 ms and no QTc increases of >60 ms from baseline were observed. Similar results were obtained with individualized heart rate correction of cardiac repolarization (QTcI). Assay validity was demonstrated by maximum ΔΔQTcF of >5 ms after 400 mg moxifloxacin on both on-treatment assessment days. The selected supratherapeutic dose produced approximately 5-fold higher exposures (Cmax and AUC) than the therapeutic dose, and was considered appropriate to investigate the effects of siponimod on QT/QTc at substantial multiples of the anticipated maximum therapeutic exposure. IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide evidence that siponimod is not associated with a significant arrhythmogenic potential related to QT prolongation.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which a clot forms in the deep veins, most commonly of the leg. It occurs in approximately 1 in 1,000 people. If left untreated, the clot can travel up to the lungs and cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Previously, a DVT was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. However, two forms of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and oral factor Xa inhibitors. The new drugs have characteristics that may be favourable over conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or re-dosing and few known drug interactions. To date, no Cochrane review has measured the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the treatment of DVT. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of DVT. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched January 2015) and the Cochrane Register of Studies (last searched January 2015). We searched clinical trials databases for details of ongoing or unpublished studies and the reference lists of relevant articles retrieved by electronic searches for additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials in which people with a DVT confirmed by standard imaging techniques, were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor for the treatment of DVT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (LR, JM) independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in the trials. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with the third review author (PK). We performed meta-analyses when we considered heterogeneity low. The two primary outcomes were recurrent VTE and PE. Other outcomes included all-cause mortality and major bleeding. We calculated all outcomes using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 randomised controlled trials of 27,945 participants. Three studies tested oral DTIs (two dabigatran and one ximelagatran), while eight tested oral factor Xa inhibitors (four rivaroxaban, two apixaban and two edoxaban). We deemed all included studies to be of high methodological quality and low risk of bias. The quality of the evidence was graded as high as the outcomes were direct and effect estimates were consistent and precise, as reflected in the narrow CIs around the ORs. Meta-analysis of three studies (7596 participants) comparing oral DTIs with standard anticoagulation groups showed no difference in the rate of recurrent VTE (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.49), recurrent DVT (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.58), fatal PE (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.27 to 3.70), non-fatal PE (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.90) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.13). However, oral DTIs were associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.98). Meta-analysis of eight studies (16,356 participants) comparing oral factor Xa inhibitors with standard anticoagulation demonstrated a similar rate of recurrent VTE between the two treatments (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07). Oral factor Xa inhibitors were associated with a lower rate of recurrent DVT (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.98). However, this was a weak association, heavily dependent on one study. The rate of fatal (OR 1.20; 95% CI 0.71 to 2.03), non-fatal PE (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.28) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.23) was similar between the two treatment groups. Oral factor Xa inhibitors were also associated with reduced bleeding (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.76). None of the included studies measured post-thrombotic syndrome or health-related quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: NOACs such as DTIs and factor Xa inhibitors may be an effective and safe alternative to conventional anticoagulation treatment for acute DVT.

Use of transgenic mouse models to understand the oral disposition and drug-drug interaction potential of cobimetinib, a MEK inhibitor.

Data from the clinical absolute bioavailability (F) study with cobimetinib suggested that F was lower than predicted based on its low hepatic extraction and good absorption. The CYP3A4 transgenic (Tg) mouse model with differential expression of CYP3A4 in the liver (Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep) or intestine (Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Int) and both liver and intestine (Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep/Int) were used to study the contribution of intestinal metabolism to the F of cobimetinib. In addition, the effect of CYP3A4 inhibition and induction on cobimetinib exposures was tested in the Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep/Int and PXR-CAR-CYP3A4/CYP3A7 mouse models, respectively. After i.v. administration of 1 mg/kg cobimetinib to wild-type [(WT) FVB], Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep, Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Int, or Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep/Int mice, clearance (CL) (26-35 ml/min/kg) was similar in the CYP3A4 transgenic and WT mice. After oral administration of 5 mg/kg cobimetinib, the area under the curve (AUC) values of cobimetinib in WT, Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep, Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Int, or Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep/Int mice were 1.35, 3.39, 1.04, and 0.701 µM⋅h, respectively. The approximately 80% lower AUC of cobimetinib in transgenic mice when intestinal CYP3A4 was present suggested that the intestinal first pass contributed to the oral CL of cobimetinib. Oxidative metabolites observed in human circulation were also observed in the transgenic mice. In drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies using Cyp3a(-/-)Tg-3A4Hep/Int mice, 8- and 4-fold increases in oral and i.v. cobimetinib exposure, respectively, were observed with itraconazole co-administration. In PXR-CAR-CYP3A4/CYP3A7 mice, rifampin induction decreased cobimetinib oral exposure by approximately 80%. Collectively, these data support the conclusion that CYP3A4 intestinal metabolism contributes to the oral disposition of cobimetinib and suggest that under certain circumstances the transgenic model may be useful in predicting clinical DDIs.

Safety and effectiveness of the association ezetimibe-statin (E-S) versus high dose rosuvastatin after acute coronary syndrome: the SAFE-ES study.

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy is a cornerstone therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the use of these drugs can be limited by side effects, mainly muscular pain. Ezetimibe is a newer lipid-lowering agent, with fewer side effects. AIMS: The present study was designed to compare a commercially available association of ezetimibe and simvastatin (E-S) to high dose Rosuvastatin on cholesterol and muscular enzyme levels and occurrence of muscular pain. METHODS: All consecutive ACS statin-naïve patients with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)>100mg/dL randomly received either high dose statin (Rosuvastatin 20mg) or E-S 10/40-mg. All patients had one-month follow-up with biological testing and clinical examination. We compared the two groups on the biological efficiency and incidence of muscular pain. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were randomized; 64 received E-S and 64 Rosuvastatin. In the two groups, the lowering of LDL-C level (Δ=51%) at one month was significant (P<0.01) without any difference in the rate of lowering on LDL-C or HDL-C suggesting that E-S is as effective as high dose Rosuvastatin (P=0.77 and P=0.99). The rate of patients reaching the objective of LDL-C<100mg/dL (45%) and LDL-C<70mg/dL (51%) was not different in the two clusters (P=0.65). Incidence of muscular pain was 15% higher in patients treated with Rosuvastatin (P=0.01) without any difference on CPK level (P=0.6). CONCLUSION: Using an association of E-S in an effective alternative strategy to high dose Rosuvastatin with a lower incidence of muscular pain, which might impact adherence to medication after ACS.

Chronic sazetidine-A maintains anxiolytic effects and slower weight gain following chronic nicotine without maintaining increased density of nicotinic receptors in rodent brain.

Chronic nicotine administration increases the density of brain α4ß2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which may contribute to nicotine addiction by exacerbating withdrawal symptoms associated with smoking cessation. Varenicline, a smoking cessation drug, also increases these receptors in rodent brain. The maintenance of this increase by varenicline as well as nicotine replacement may contribute to the high rate of relapse during the first year after smoking cessation. Recently, we found that sazetidine-A (saz-A), a potent partial agonist that desensitizes α4ß2* nAChRs, does not increase the density of these receptors in brain at doses that decrease nicotine self-administration, increase attention in rats, and produce anxiolytic effects in mice. Here, we investigated whether chronic saz-A and varenicline maintain the density of nAChRs after their up-regulation by nicotine. In addition, we examined the effects of these drugs on a measure of anxiety in mice and weight gain in rats. After increasing nAChRs in the rodent brain with chronic nicotine, replacing nicotine with chronic varenicline maintained the increased nAChR binding, as well as the α4ß2 subunit proteins measured by western blots. In contrast, replacing nicotine treatments with chronic saz-A resulted in the return of the density of nAChRs to the levels seen in saline controls. Nicotine, saz-A and varenicline each demonstrated anxiolytic effects in mice, but only saz-A and nicotine attenuated the gain of weight over a 6-week period in rats. These findings suggest that apart from its modest anxiolytic and weight control effects, saz-A, or drugs like it, may be useful in achieving long-term abstinence from smoking.

Systems biology analysis unravels the complementary action of combined rosuvastatin and ezetimibe therapy.

AIMS: Combination-drug therapy takes advantage of the complementary action of their individual components, thereby potentiating its therapeutic effect. Potential disadvantages include side effects that are not foreseen on basis of the data available from drug monotherapy. Here, we used a systems biology approach to understand both the efficacy and the side effects of a cholesterol-lowering drug-combination therapy on the basis of the biological pathways and molecular processes affected by each drug alone or in combination. METHODS AND RESULTS: ApoE*3Leiden transgenic mice, a mouse model with human-like cholesterol-lowering drug responses, were treated with rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, alone and in combination. Analyses included functional responses, viz. effects on cardiovascular risk factors, inflammation, and atherosclerosis, and measurement of global gene expression, and identification of enriched biological pathways and molecular processes. Combination therapy reduced plasma cholesterol, plasma inflammation markers, and atherosclerosis stronger than the single drugs did. Systems biology analysis at the level of biological processes shows that the therapeutic benefit of combined therapy is largely the result of additivity of the complementary mechanisms of action of the two single drugs. Importantly, combination therapy also exerted a significant effect on 16 additional and mostly NF-κB-linked signaling processes, 11 of which tended to be regulated in a similar direction with monotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study shows that gene expression analysis together with bioinformatics pathway analysis has the potential to help predict and identify drug combination-specific complementary and side effects.

Nutraceutical pill containing berberine versus ezetimibe on plasma lipid pattern in hypercholesterolemic subjects and its additive effect in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia on stable cholesterol-lowering treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although statins (STs) are drugs of first choice in hypercholesterolemic patients, especially in those at high cardiovascular risk, some of them are intolerant to STs or refuse treatment with these drugs. In view of this, we have evaluated the lipid-lowering effect of a nutraceutical pill containing berberine (BBR) and of ezetimibe, as alternative treatments, in monotherapy or in combination, in 228 subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia (HCH), with history of STs intolerance or refusing STs treatment. In addition, since PCSK9 was found up-regulated by STs dampening their effect through an LDL receptors (LDLRs) degradation, and BBR suppressed PCSK9 expression in cellular studies, we supplemented the stable lipid-lowering therapy of 30 genotype-confirmed Familial Hypercholesterolemia heterozygotes (HeFH) with BBR, searching for a further plasma cholesterol reduction. Plasma lipid pattern was evaluated at baseline and during treatments. RESULTS: In HCH subjects the nutraceutical pill resulted more effective than EZE in lowering LDL cholesterol (-31.7% vs -25.4%, P < 0.001) and better tolerated. On treatment, LDL-C level below 3.36 mmol/L (≤130 mg/dl) was observed in 28.9% of subjects treated with the nutraceutical pill and 11.8% of those treated with EZE (P <0.007). In the group treated with EZE the subjects carrying the G allele of the g.1679 C > G silent polymorphism of NPC1L1 gene showed a higher response to EZE than homozygous for the common allele (GG + CG: LDL-C -29.4±5.0%, CC -23.6±6.5%, P <0.001). Combined treatment with these drugs was as effective as STs in moderate doses (LDL cholesterol -37%, triglycerides -23%). In HeFH patients the addition of BBR resulted in LDL cholesterol reductions inversely related to those induced by the stable therapy (r = -0.617, P <0.0001), with mean 10.5% further decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The alternative treatments tested in our HCH subjects were rather effective and safe. The findings in HeFH patients suggest that BBR might act in vivo increasing expression and stability of LDLRs and/or suppressing PCSK9 expression.

Ezetimibe: A biomarker for efficacy of liver directed UGT1A1 gene therapy for inherited hyperbilirubinemia.

As recently demonstrated in patients with factor IX deficiency, adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated liver-directed therapy is a viable option for inherited metabolic liver disorders. Our aim is to treat Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I (CN I), an inherited severe unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, as a rare recessive inherited disorder. Because the number of patients eligible for this approach is small, the efficacy can only be demonstrated by a beneficial effect on the pathophysiology in individual patients. Serum bilirubin levels in potential candidates have been monitored since birth, providing an indication of their pathophysiology. Adjuvant phototherapy to prevent brain damage reduces serum unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) levels in CN I patients to the level seen in the milder form of the disease, CN type II. This therapy increases the excretion of UCB, thereby complicating the use of UCB and conjugated bilirubin levels in serum as biomarkers for the gene therapy we try to develop. Therefore, a suitable biomarker that is not affected by phototherapy is currently needed. To this end, we have investigated whether estradiol, ethinylestradiol or ezetimibe could be used as markers for uridine 5'-di-phospho-glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) activity restored by AAV gene therapy in Gunn rats, a relevant animal model for CN I. Of these compounds, ezetimibe appeared most suitable because its glucuronidation rate in untreated control Gunn rats is low. Subsequently, ezetimibe glucuronidation was studied in both untreated and AAV-treated Gunn rats and the results suggest that it may serve as a useful serum marker for restored hepatic UGT1A1 activity.

Effects of simvastatin, atorvastatin, ezetimibe, and ezetimibe + simvastatin combination on the inflammatory process and on the liver metabolic changes of arthritic rats.

In this study, simvastatin, atorvastatin, ezetimibe, and ezetimibe + simvastatin combination were administered to arthritic rats, first to determine their effects on the inflammatory response, employing a low-dose adjuvant-induced arthritis model in rats. Arthritis was induced by the subcutaneous injection of a suspension of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (100 µg) in mineral oil [complete Freund's adjuvant used (CFA)] into the plantar surface of the hind paws. Simvastatin(40 mg/kg), atorvastatin(10 mg/kg), ezetimibe(10 mg/kg), ezetimibe(10 mg/kg) + simvastatin(20 mg/kg or 40 mg/kg) were given intragastrically and the treatment began on the day of CFA injection and continued daily up to the 28th day after arthritis induction. The ezetimibe + simvastatin combination was more effective in reducing the inflammatory response in arthritic rats than in atorvastatin, simvastatin, or ezetimibe monotherapy. The observed effect seems to be cholesterol-independent as there were no changes in plasma cholesterol levels. In spite of the benefits on joint lesions, treatment with ezetimibe + simvastatin combination caused a marked increment in liver, kidneys, spleen size, and plasma transaminases activities. Therefore, animals treated with the ezetimibe(10 mg/kg) + simvastatin(40 mg/kg) combination were also submitted to liver perfusion experiments. In this regard, ezetimibe + simvastatin did not improve the liver metabolic alterations seen in control arthritic rats, on the contrary, a worsening was observed in liver production of glucose from alanine, as well as in oxygen uptake. All of these metabolic changes appear to be induced by treatment with ezetimibe + simvastatin combination, as the same metabolic effects were observed in normal and treated arthritic animals.

Atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10mg compared with atorvastatin 20 mg: impact on the lipid profile in Japanese patients with abnormal glucose tolerance and coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is a sensitive lipid marker for predicting atherosclerosis. Ezetimibe and statins are reported to decrease both LDL cholesterol and oxidized LDL cholesterol. This prospective randomized open-label crossover study compared combination therapy with atorvastatin plus ezetimibe versus high-dose atorvastatin monotherapy. Changes in serum lipids, including malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL) as a representative form of oxidized LDL cholesterol, and glucose metabolism were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The subjects were 39 Japanese patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance who were taking 10 mg/day of atorvastatin (30 men and 9 women with a mean age of 67.8 years). They were randomized to a group that first received add-on ezetimibe (10 mg/day) or a group that first received atorvastatin monotherapy at a higher dose of 20 mg/day. Both treatments were given for 12 weeks each in a crossover fashion. Add-on ezetimibe significantly decreased MDA-LDL (109.0 ± 31.9 mg/dl to 87.7 ± 29.4 mg/dl, p=0.0009), while up-titration of atorvastatin did not. The decrease with add-on ezetimibe was significantly greater than with up-titration of atorvastatin (p=0.0006). Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were significantly decreased by both treatments, but the percent reduction with add-on ezetimibe was significantly greater (p<0.05). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased by both treatments and there was no significant difference between them. The apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio and remnant-like particle cholesterol were only significantly decreased by add-on ezetimibe. Both treatments caused similar elevation of hemoglobin A(1c). CONCLUSION: In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance and coronary artery disease, adding ezetimibe (10 mg/day) to atorvastatin (10 mg/day) significantly improved the lipid profile compared with atorvastatin monotherapy at 20 mg/day.

[Effects of different statins, ezetimibe/simvastatin combination on hsCRP levels in unstable angina pectoris and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: a randomized trial]. / Kararsiz anjina pektoris ve ST-elevasyonsuz miyokart enfarktüslü hastalarda degisik statinlerin, ezetimib/simvastatin kombinasyonunun hsCRP düzeyleri üzerine etkileri: randomize bir çalisma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of two different statins and a statin/ezetimibe combination on high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) values, which were given at high doses in the early period of acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris were enrolled to our prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Patients were divided into three groups by block randomization method. One group received 20 mg/day atorvastatin, one group received 10 mg/day rosuvastatin and the other group received 10 mg/day ezetimibe/simvastatin combination therapy, which was initiated within the first 24 hours of admission. Follow-up duration was 2 months . Biochemical investigations and hsCRP levels (by nephelometric method) were performed with 138 patients evaluated at baseline, 10th and 60th days of therapy. Decreases of hsCRP levels were analyzed with one-way MANOVA and repeated measures of ANOVA methods. Post-hoc Tukey HSD test was performed for finding the different group, when the difference was detected between the groups. RESULTS: Tenth day hsCRP levels in ezetimibe/simvastatin group was significantly lower than the other groups (p<0.001). Further, after 60 days of follow-up a significant reduction was seen in hsCRP levels in ezetimib/simvastatin group (in ezetimibe/simvastatin group the mean hsCRP was reduced from 38.4±15.0 mg/L to 2.4±1.3 mg/L, in atorvastatin group the mean hsCRP was reduced from 27.3±11.7 mg/L to 4.1±2.4 mg/L and in rosuvastatin group the mean hsCRP was reduced from 22.0±6.9 mg/L to 3.6±1.7 mg/L (F (1.1, 148.2) = 746.9, p<0.01 and the difference between drugs; F (2.2, 148.2) = 32.1, p<0.01). No side effects related to drugs were seen during follow-up in all three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/day combination treatment was superior to atorvastatin 20 mg/day and rosuvastatin 10 mg/day treatment in reducing the inflammatory markers when high dose statins was started in the early period of unstable angina and non ST elevation myocardial infarction.

The role of soluble fiber intake in patients under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that statins can increase intestinal sterol absorption. Augments in phytosterolemia seems related to cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: We examined the role of soluble fiber intake in endogenous cholesterol synthesis and in sterol absorption among subjects under highly effective lipid-lowering therapy. DESIGN: In an open label, randomized, parallel-design study with blinded endpoints, subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia (n = 116) were assigned to receive during 12 weeks, a daily dose of 25 g of fiber (corresponding to 6 g of soluble fibers) plus rosuvastatin 40 mg (n = 28), rosuvastatin 40 mg alone (n = 30), sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg plus 25 g of fiber (n = 28), or sinvastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 30) alone. RESULTS: The four assigned therapies produced similar changes in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides (p < 0.001 vs. baseline) and did not change HDL-cholesterol. Fiber intake decreased plasma campesterol (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), particularly among those patients receiving ezetimibe (p < 0.05 vs. other groups), and ß-sitosterol (p = 0.03 vs. baseline), with a trend for lower levels in the group receiving fiber plus ezetimibe (p = 0.07). Treatment with rosuvastatin alone or combined with soluble fiber was associated with decreased levels of desmosterol (p = 0.003 vs. other groups). Compared to non-fiber supplemented individuals, those treated with fibers had weight loss (p = 0.04), reduced body mass index (p = 0.002) and blood glucose (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Among subjects treated with highly effective lipid-lowering therapy, the intake of 25 g of fibers added favorable effects, mainly by reducing phytosterolemia. Additional benefits include improvement in blood glucose and anthropometric parameters.

Comparison of effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe, a first-in-its-class inhibitor of cholesterol absorption, is an effective agent for combined use with statins to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin as a single-tablet formulation has proven to be highly effective in reducing serum LDL-C through the dual inhibition of cholesterol absorption and biosynthesis. The effect of time of administration on efficacy of this combination therapy has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of morning versus evening administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin on serum cholesterol levels of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia randomly received ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg once daily, either in the morning (within 1 hour of breakfast) or in the evening (within 1 hour of dinner) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Data on 171 patients (87 in the morning administration group and 84 in the evening administration group) were analyzed. A significant reduction (p ≤ 0.001) in the total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, apo-lipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) from baseline was achieved after each treatment. Noninferiority of morning administration versus evening administration was shown in the percentage reduction of the LDL-C level from baseline (difference, -1.62%; 90% CI -4.94 to 1.70). No significant difference was found between groups with respect to the percentage of changes in other lipid parameters from baseline. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the percentage of change in hs-CRP as an antiinflammatory marker between the morning and evening administration groups. The frequency of adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Morning administration of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10 mg/20 mg is noninferior to evening administration with respect to LDL-C-lowering ability.

Flow-mediated dilation in patients with coronary artery disease is enhanced by high dose atorvastatin compared to combined low dose atorvastatin and ezetimibe: results of the CEZAR study.

BACKGROUND: Effects independent from cholesterol reduction on vascular function are considered to importantly contribute to the beneficial effects of statin therapy in cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the effect of high versus low dose atorvastatin on endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) in a setting of comparable cholesterol reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with CAD were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for 8 weeks with atorvastatin 80 mg per day (A80) or atorvastatin 10mg+ezetimibe 10mg per day (A10E10), respectively. Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, nitroglycerin-mediated endothelium-independent vasodilation (NMD), lipid, C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations and urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2alpha excretion were measured before and after treatment. Total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly reduced with no difference between A80 and A10E10. A80 caused significantly stronger improvement of FMD compared to A10E10 (absolute change FMD: A80+2.7+/-3.0% (post vs. pre p<0.001), A10E10+0.6+/-2.9% (post vs. pre p=0.25), A80 vs. A10E10 p=0.018). NMD was improved by A80 but not by A10E10 (absolute change NMD: A80+2.7+/-4.6%, A10E10+0.7+/-3.5%, p=0.12). Both treatment groups caused a comparable reduction of CRP and did not effect urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2alpha excretion. There was no correlation between FMD or NMD change and LDL-cholesterol change in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings clearly suggest that in the presence of comparable LDL-lowering effects of both treatment forms, LDL-cholesterol independent effects of high dose atorvastatin therapy account for the improvement of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with stable CAD.

Asymmetric dimethylarginine and the effect of folate substitution in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus type 1.

A recently discussed cardiovascular risk factor, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), is known to act as an endogenous inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The aim of this study was to establish 1) the relationship between ADMA and ultrasonographically or biochemically determined endothelial dysfunction in children, and 2) the effect of folate supplementation on these parameters. The study cohort included 32 children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), 30 with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) and 30 age-matched healthy children as the control group. Furthermore, twenty-eight randomly selected FH and DM1 children were re-examined after 3-months supplementation with folic acid. Baseline levels of ADMA and oxidized low density lipoproteins (oxLDL) were significantly higher in FH group than in DM1 and healthy children. Children in DM1 group had significantly lower concentration of homocysteine, but ADMA levels were normal. Folic acid supplementation significantly lowered homocysteine and hsCRP levels in both FH and DM1 group; however, ADMA and oxLDL concentrations remained unaltered. In conclusion, ADMA and oxLDL appear to be associated with endothelial dysfunction in children with FH. Administration of folic acid did not influence these markers in both FH and DM1 children.