RESUMEN
Hyperbaric therapy is generally considered a safe therapy for the treatment of wounds, mucormycosis, and orthopedic injuries. It is fraught with complications such as barotrauma, pulmonary toxicity, fire hazards, and claustrophobia. This article discusses the safety protocols and preventive aspects on usefulness of this new emerging therapy.
Résumé La thérapie hyperbare est généralement considérée comme une thérapie sûre pour le traitement des plaies, de la mucormycose et des blessures orthopédiques. Elle entraîne de nombreuses complications telles que le barotraumatisme, la toxicité pulmonaire, les risques d'incendie et la claustrophobie. Cet article traite des protocoles de sécurité et des aspects préventifs sur l'utilité de cette nouvelle thérapie émergente. Mots-clés: Claustrophobie, médecine hyperbare, sécurité.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Introduction: Cerebral radiation necrosis is rarely encountered in pediatric patients. This case report describes a child with cerebral radiation necrosis who was successfully treated using corticosteroids, bevacizumab, and hyperbaric oxygenation. Case report: A 3-year-old boy developed progressive extremity weakness six months after the completion of radiation therapy for the treatment of a neuroepithelial malignancy. Treatment with corticosteroids and bevacizumab was initiated, but his symptoms did not improve, and he was then referred for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. After completing 60 hyperbaric treatments, he experienced significant improvements in mobility, which remained stable over the next year. Discussion: Cerebral radiation necrosis typically presents in children with symptoms of ataxia or headache. Corticosteroids and bevacizumab are common treatments, but hyperbaric oxygen therapy has also been studied as a therapeutic modality for this condition. When considering the use of hyperbaric oxygenation in pediatric patients, careful attention to treatment planning and patient safety can reduce the risks of adverse events such as middle ear barotrauma and confinement anxiety. Conclusion: In addition to other available pharmacologic therapies, hyperbaric oxygenation should be considered for the treatment of pediatric patients with cerebral radiation necrosis.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas , Cerebro , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Traumatismos por Radiación , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Necrosis/etiología , Necrosis/terapia , Cerebro/patología , Cerebro/efectos de la radiación , Lesiones Encefálicas/etiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/patología , Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Traumatismos por Radiación/terapia , Neoplasias Neuroepiteliales/radioterapiaRESUMEN
Respiratory injury during or following hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is rare, but associated pressure changes can cause iatrogenic pulmonary barotrauma with potentially severe sequelae such as pneumothoraces. Pulmonary blebs, bullae, and other emphysematous airspace abnormalities increase the risk of respiratory complications and are prevalent in otherwise healthy adults. HBOT providers may elect to use chest X-ray routinely as a pre-treatment screening tool to identify these anomalies, particularly if a history of preceding pulmonary disease is identified, but this approach has a low sensitivity and frequently provides false negative results. Computed tomography scans offer greater sensitivity for airspace lesions, but given the high prevalence of incidental and insignificant pulmonary findings among healthy individuals, would lead to a high false positive rate because most lesions are unlikely to pose a hazard during HBOT. Post-mortem and imaging studies of airspace lesion prevalence show that a significant proportion of patients who undergo HBOT likely have pulmonary abnormalities such as blebs and bullae. Nevertheless, pulmonary barotrauma is rare, and occurs mainly in those with known underlying lung pathology. Consequently, routinely using chest X-ray or computed tomography scans as screening tools prior to HBOT for low-risk patients without a pertinent medical history or lack of clinical symptoms of cardiorespiratory disease is of low value. This review outlines published cases of patients experiencing pulmonary barotrauma while undergoing pressurised treatment/testing in a hyperbaric chamber and analyses the relationship between barotrauma and pulmonary findings on imaging prior to or following exposure. A checklist and clinical decision-making tool based on suggested low-risk and high-risk features are offered to guide the use of targeted baseline thoracic imaging prior to HBOT.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Lesión Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Barotrauma/complicaciones , Barotrauma/etiología , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/terapia , Lesión Pulmonar/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric oxygenation therapy (HBOT) is used as emergency treatment for decompression sickness, gas embolism, carbon monoxide intoxication, and necrotizing fasciitis. There is low evidence and little clinical knowledge about the treatment of children with HBOT. METHODS: We sent an internet-based questionnaire to HBO centers in Europe to gain information about their experience with children and HBOT. RESULTS: Out of all HBO-centers who participated in the questionnaire 90% treat children analogue to adults about indication and HBOT protocol. Most treated children had life-threatening indications or the risk of organ loss. The reported rate of side effects was: 6.8% anxiety, 2.4% barotrauma, 0.9% seizure, 0.2% retinopathy and no case of pulmonary barotrauma or oxygen toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: HBO therapy for children is present in European HBO centers. The rate of severe side effects is as low to the rates in adults; apart from this, oxygen-related seizures and anxiety are more frequent. A special focus seems necessary on the psychological management of the children, because anxiety is common depending on the age of the children. Especially for smaller children, an adequate psychological support seems essential. Prospective observational or controlled studies in children seem necessary to create relevant clinical evidence for HBOT and to observe the rate of side-effects.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Barotrauma/etiología , Niño , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Oxígeno , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear barotrauma (MEB) are common reported complications during hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Our Phase I study data was the first to demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the occurrence of symptomatic ETD and MEB. The Phase I Trial suggested the total time interval and rate (slope) of compression (ROC) may be a determining factor in ETD and MEB. This Phase II study investigates an optimal rate of compression to reduce ETD and MEB when considering each multiplace treatment (with multiple patients) as the unit of observation as a group, rather than for each individual patient. Data were collected prospectively on 1,244 group patient-treatment exposures, collectively including 5,072 individual patient-treatment/exposures. We randomly assigned patient-treatment group exposures to four different time interval and rate (slope) of compression. These compression rates and slopes were identical to those used in the Phase I trial. All patients experiencing symptoms of MEB requiring compression stops were evaluated post treatment for the presence of ETD and MEB using the O'Neill Grading System (OGS) for ETD. Data were analyzed using the IBM-SPSS statistical software program. A statistically significant decrease in the number of compression holds was observed in the 15-minute compression schedule, correlating to the results observed in the Phase I trial. The 15-minute linear compression profile continues to demonstrate the decreased need for patient symptomatic compression stops (as in the Phase I trial) using a USN TT9 during elective hyperbaric oxygen treatments in a Class A multiplace hyperbaric chamber. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04776967.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Oído/epidemiología , Oído Medio/lesiones , Trompa Auditiva/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Oído/etiología , Enfermedades del Oído/prevención & control , Oído Medio/fisiología , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Presión/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Tiempo , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Middle ear barotrauma (MEB) is a common complication of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. It has been reported in more than 40% of HBO2 treatments and can interrupt the sequence of HBO2. MEB may lead to pain, tympanic membrane rupture, and even hearing loss. The aim of this study was to determine if pretreatment with intranasal fluticasone and oxymetazoline affected the incidence of MEB. We conducted a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing HBO2 at our institution between February 1, 2014, and May 31, 2019. Subjects in the fluticasone/oxymetazoline (FOT) treatment group used intranasal fluticasone 50 mcg two times per day and oxymetazoline 0.05% one spray two times per day beginning 48 hours prior to initial HBO2. Oxymetazoline was discontinued after four days. Fluticasone was continued for the duration of HBO2 therapy. A total of 154 unique subjects underwent 5,683 HBO2 treatments: 39 unique subjects in the FOT group underwent 1,501 HBO2; 115 unique subjects in the nFOT (no oxymetazoline or fluticasone treatment) group underwent 4,182 HBO2 treatments. The incidence of MEB was 15.4% in the FOT group and 16.2% in the nFOT group. This was not a statistically significant difference (OR = 0.77; p = 0.636). Treatment pressure, age over 65 years, male sex, and BMI were not associated with a difference in MEB incidence. In summary, pretreatment with intranasal oxymetazoline and fluticasone in patients undergoing HBO2 did not significantly reduce MEB. More investigation with larger numbers of participants and prospective studies could further clarify this issue.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Oído Medio/lesiones , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Oximetazolina/uso terapéutico , Administración Intranasal , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descongestionantes Nasales/administración & dosificación , Rociadores Nasales , Oximetazolina/administración & dosificación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), a patient is exposed to pure oxygen in a chamber. While HBOT is a long-standing and well-established treatment for a wide variety of medical conditions, one of the main complications is middle ear barotrauma (MEB), which can lead to complaints of ear discomfort, stuffiness or fullness in the ear, and difficulties in equalizing ear pressure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of self-acupressure in preventing and reducing the degree of MEB associated with HBOT. METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. A sample of 152 participants will be assigned to 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio. The participants in the control group will receive conventional Valsalva and Toynbee maneuvers, while those in the experimental group will be given additional self-acupressure therapy. The acupoints used will be TE17 (Yifeng), TE21 (Ermen), SI19 (Tinggong), and GB2 (Tinghui). The Modified Teed Classification, symptoms of MEB, and overall ear discomfort levels will be assessed. Data will be analyzed using the Chi-Squared test or t test. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of self-acupressure for preventing and reducing the degree of MEB associated with HBOT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04311437. Registered on 17 March, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Acupresión/métodos , Barotrauma/terapia , Oído Medio/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Autocuidado/métodos , Puntos de Acupuntura , Adulto , Barotrauma/etiología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Maniobra de Valsalva , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Middle ear barotrauma (MEBt) is a common side effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) and can result in pain, hearing loss, tinnitus and otorrhagia. The use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs is thought to increase the risk and severity of MEBt during HBOT. METHODS: Single centre, retrospective observational cohort study of all patients treated with HBOT over a 4-year period (between 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2018) looking at the incidence of MEBt and the concurrent use of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs. MEBt was assessed by direct otoscopy of the tympanic membrane post-HBOT and scored using the modified Teed classification. Multivariate modelling assessed the relationship between antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation drug use, age, sex, and MEBt during HBOT. RESULTS: There was no evidence that antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation drugs increase the risk of tympanic barotrauma in HBOT patients. The prevalence of MEBt was higher in female patients than in males (χ2 P = 0.004), and increased with age (χ2 P = 0.048). No MEBt was recorded in patients undergoing recompression therapy for decompression sickness or cerebral arterial gas embolism. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective single-centre study, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation drugs did not affect the risk of MEBt, but both age and sex did, with greater prevalence of MEBt among older patients and females compared with younger patients and males. A predictive model, requiring further validation, may be helpful in assessing the likelihood of MEBt in patients undergoing HBOT.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/terapia , Oído Medio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Oxígeno , Estudios Retrospectivos , Membrana TimpánicaRESUMEN
Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen dosing variations exist in radiation cystitis treatment. The objectives of this study were to compare response and safety rates among patients with radiation cystitis treated with different protocols: 2.0 ATA (atmospheres absolute) for 120 minutes at the University of Pennsylvania; and 2.4 ATA for 90 minutes at Hennepin Healthcare. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review of radiation cystitis patients treated with hyperbaric oxygen at the University of Pennsylvania (January 2010-December 2018) and Hennepin Healthcare Minnesota (January 2014-December 2018). Primary outcome was response to treatment. Complications were limited to hyperbaric-related conditions. Regression analysis was performed with ordinal logistic regression and binary logistic regression. Result: 126 patients were included in the analysis (2.0 ATA: 66, 2.4 ATA: 60). Overall response rate was 75.4% (good) and was not significantly different between protocols (good response: 2.0 ATA 72.7% vs. 2.4 ATA 78.3% p=0.74). The 2.0 ATA group required additional treatments [2.0 ATA: 45.45 ± 14.5 vs. 2.4 ATA: 40.03 ± 9.7, p<0.05]. 6.1% (2.0 ATA) and 13.3% (2.4 ATA) required tympanostomy tube placement or needle myringotomy for otic barotrauma (p=0.22). Transfusion was associated with poorer outcomes (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both groups - 2.0 ATA and 2.4 ATA - had similar response and complication rates. Blood transfusion is a negative prognostic factor for treatment outcome.
Asunto(s)
Cistitis/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/terapia , Anciano , Presión Atmosférica , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Ventilación del Oído Medio , Pronóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Reacción a la Transfusión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Membrana Timpánica/cirugíaRESUMEN
Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is the use of oxygen or gas mixtures at a pressure above atmospheric pressure for therapeutic purposes. This treatment is used in numerous pathological processes. Its main side effect is middle ear barotrauma (MEB), which represents a great concern for iatrogenic HBO2 therapy. The aim of this work is to describe this adverse event in order to highlight clinical elements that can contribute to its prevention and management. Methods: We conducted a five-year retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2017, where 2,610 patients were selected, in the Hyperbaric Medicine Centre, Sainte- Marguerite Hospital of Marseille, France. Results: 262 patients experienced MEB after HBO2, representing a prevalence of 10.04% and incidence of 0.587%. Their average age was 55 ± 19 years. Women were more affected than men. We have not highlighted a seasonality to this condition. Risk factors were: age older than 55 years, female gender, ear, nose and throat history (cancer, radiotherapy, infections or allergies, malformations or benign tumors), general history (smoking, obstructive breathing disorders, thyroid disorders and obesity), HBO2-approved indications of sudden deafness and delayed wound healing, and altered tympanic mobility on initial examination. Although the benign stages of Haines-Harris classification were the most encountered in our study, MEB was responsible for premature discontinuation of HBO2. Conclusion: MEB is a common condition responsible for many premature discontinuations of HBO2. Its origin is multifactorial, associating non-modifiable and modifiable factors. Better management of this affection will further contribute to making HBO2 a low-risk treatment.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma/etiología , Oído Medio/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Privación de TratamientoRESUMEN
Safety monitoring and successful blinding are important features of randomized, blinded clinical trials. We report chamber- and protocol-related adverse events (AEs) for participants enrolled in two randomized, double-blind clinical trials of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) for persistent post-concussive symptoms clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NCT01306968, HOPPS, and NCT01611194, BIMA), as well as the success of maintaining the blind with a low-pressure sham control arm. In both studies, participants were randomized to receive HBO2 (1.5 atmospheres absolute, >99% oxygen) or sham chamber sessions (1.2 atmospheres absolute, room air). In 143 participants undergoing 4,245 chamber sessions, chamber-related adverse events were rare (1.1% in the HOPPS study, 2.2% in the BIMA study). Minor, non-limiting barotrauma was the most frequently reported. Rarely, some participants experienced headache with chamber sessions. No serious adverse events were associated with chamber sessions. An allocation questionnaire completed after intervention revealed that the sham control arm adequately protected the blind in both trials. Participants based allocation assumptions on symptom improvement or lack of symptom improvement and could not discern intervention arm by pressure, smell, taste, or gas flow.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Síndrome Posconmocional/terapia , Adulto , Barotrauma/etiología , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Método Doble Ciego , Dolor de Oído/etiología , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Masculino , Personal Militar , Proyectos Piloto , Distribución Aleatoria , SeguridadRESUMEN
Introduction: Symptomatic Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) and middle ear barotrauma (MEB) are the most common reported complications during hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) treatment. There is no standardized rate of compression (ROC) reported to decrease the incidence rates of ETD and MEB during hyperbaric treatments. Few studies actually demonstrate that the ROC decreases the incidence of ETD or MEB. Methods: Our study was designed to determine an optimal hyperbaric chamber compression rate that might reduce the incidence of symptomatic ETD leading to MEB during the compression phase of treatment in a multiplace hyperbaric chamber. Data was collected prospectively over 2,807 elective patient treatments compressed using a U.S. Navy Treatment Table 9 (USN TT9) with a modified ROC. ROC was assigned using two variables, time (10 vs.15 minutes) and slope (linear vs. non-linear compression). Patients were exposed to all four compression schedules in a consecutive daily fashion. We recorded any patient requiring a stop during initial compression due to ear discomfort. Anyone requiring a stop was evaluated post treatment for MEB. Findings were compared to our standard 10-minute linear ROC. Evaluation of the tympanic membrane was accomplished using video otoscopy. Barotrauma when present was classified using both the Teed and O'Neill grading systems. Data was analyzed using basic statistical methods. Results: When comparing four different rates of compression during an elective USN TT9 in a multiplace (Class A) chamber there is a decreased incidence for symptomatic ETD when using a 15-minute linear compression schedule (p-value ⟨0.05). Conclusion: Using a 15-minute linear compression schedule is associated with less symptomatic ETD and less MEB when performing an elective 45 fsw (USN TT9) hyperbaric treatment in a Class A chamber. Asymptomatic ETD and MEB were not considered in this study.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Oído/prevención & control , Trompa Auditiva/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Barotrauma/etiología , Protocolos Clínicos , Enfermedades del Oído/etiología , Oído Medio/lesiones , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Otoscopía/métodos , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Membrana TimpánicaRESUMEN
Hyperbaric-associated middle ear barotrauma (MEB) is one of the most common side effects of the exposure to hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. This retrospective observational study of 5,962 patients undergoing longterm therapy for chronic conditions took place at the local Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Unit (DHMU) in Villafranca-Verona (Italy), a DHMU that administers, in multiplace chambers, more than 20,000 HBO2 treatments per year. The study was designed to weight and analyze both the incidence and severity of MEBs at the facility. Thanks to a systematic recording method over eight years, 2003-2010, we observed 549 MEBs (9.2% of all HBO2 treatments). The majority of them were female patients older than 50. MEBs observed were usually of minor complexity, with minimal otoscopic changes (69.03% of our occurrences were registered as Wallace-Teed Grade 1). MEBs were registered in 20.3% of those patients already suffering from difficulties in equalizing ear pressure, and/or presenting ear pain during the initial compression phase (descent) of the hyperbaric treatment. Inflammatory diseases of the upper respiratory tract, with special attention to rhinitis, appear to be a condition capable of predisposing patients in developing MEB. MEB did lead to the suspension of therapy for 89 patients in our case series. This was 16.2% of all the MEBs registered, or 1.49% of all patients who underwent HBO2 at the facility in the considered time lapse.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma/epidemiología , Oído Medio/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Barotrauma/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinitis/complicaciones , Distribución por Sexo , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Middle ear barotrauma (MEB), one of the side effects of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy, sometimes cannot be directly diagnosed during the therapy itself. Instead, its incidence and degree are judged based on subjective statements made by patients when in conversation with medical staff regarding how they feel. To prevent MEB in practice, it is proposed that the tympanic membrane evaluation system and automatic control chamber developed in a previous study be applied as part of a prevention algorithm [16]. The proposed algorithm, which determines and equalizes the unbalanced pressure of a subject based on their tympanic admittance, was evaluated in conjunction with conventional HBO2 therapy in an experiment involving 100 subjects. Among the 50 subjects in the control group who received HBO2 therapy 16 subjects experienced MEB. In contrast, the experimental group of 50 subjects were treated with a hyperbaric chamber protocol incorporating the automatic control system and proposed algorithm. At the conclusion of the treatment, no subjects exhibited middle ear barotrauma. In the case of the control group, while the target pressure was achieved, middle ear barotrauma still occurred. However, in the case of the experimental group, the pressure inside the chamber was adjusted as per the algorithm, which allowed the target pressure for every subject to be achieved without experiencing MEB. When a particular subject was unable to perform any pressure equalization method such as swallowing or the Valsalva maneuver, the chamber was not pressurized based on the tympanic admittance and thus no MEB occurred.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Oído Medio/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Terapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Pruebas de Impedancia Acústica/métodos , Adulto , Barotrauma/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Deglución , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Presión/efectos adversos , Membrana Timpánica , Maniobra de Valsalva , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In the present study, a tympanometry-based anti-barotrauma (ABT) device was designed using eardrum admittance measurements to develop an objective method of preventing barotrauma that occurs during hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. The middle ear space requires active equalization, and barotrauma of these tissues during HBO2therapy constitutes the most common treatment-associated injury. Decongestant nasal sprays and nasal steroids are used, but their efficacy is questionable to prevent middle ear barotrauma (MEB) during HBO2 treatment. Accordingly, a tympanometry-based ABT device was designed using eardrum admittance measurements to develop an objective method for preventing MEB, which causes pain and injury, and represents one of the principal reasons for patients to stop treatment. This study was conducted to test a novel technology that can be used to measure transmembrane pressures, and provide chamber attendants with real-time feedback regarding the patient's equalization status prior to the onset of pain or injury. Eardrum admittance values were measured according to pressure changes inside a hyperbaric oxygen chamber while the system was fitted to the subject. When the pressure increased to above 200 daPa, eardrum admittance decreased to 16.255% of prepressurization levels. After pressure equalization was achieved, eardrum admittance recovered to 95.595% of prepressurization levels. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance contrast test was performed on eardrum admittance before pressurization versus during pressurization, and before pressurization versus after pressure equalization. The analysis revealed significant differences at all points during pressurization (P⟨0.001), but no significant difference after pressure equalization was achieved. This ABT device can provide objective feedback reflecting eardrum condition to the patient and the chamber operator during HBO2 therapy.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Impedancia Acústica/instrumentación , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Oído Medio/lesiones , Dolor de Oído/prevención & control , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Membrana Timpánica/fisiología , Análisis de Varianza , Barotrauma/etiología , Dolor de Oído/etiología , Humanos , Manometría/instrumentación , Manometría/métodos , PresiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: One of the most common complications of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is middle ear barotrauma (MEB), occasionally causing otalgia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dried salted plum consumption on MEB and otalgia associated with HBO2 therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing the first chamber session of HBO2 therapy were included in the present prospective randomized controlled trial. The Valsalva maneuver was administered to all patients before HBO2. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: one that ate a dried salted plum during HBO2 treatment and the other that did not. An otoscopic examination was performed after HBO2 therapy. The MEB was graded according to Teed scores. The degree of otalgia was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled. The overall incidence of MEB (Teed score grade 1~4) was 39.6% (21 of 53) for patients administered a dried salted plum versus 37.8% (14 of 37) for the control group (P=1.000). The incidence of mild MEB (Teed score grade 1~2) and severe MEB (Teed score Grade 3~4) between the two groups was not significantly different. Otalgia was present in 5.7% (3 of 53) of patients administered a dried salted plum versus 18.9% (7 of 37) for the control group (P=.085). No patients administered a dried salted plum had a VAS score ≥4 for otalgia versus 10.8% (4 of 37) for the control group (P=.026). CONCLUSIONS: Dried salted plum consumption does not decrease the incidence of MEB, but may ameliorate the severity of first chamber session HBO2-induced otalgia.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Oído/etiología , Dolor de Oído/prevención & control , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Prunus domestica , Adulto , Anciano , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Oído Medio/lesiones , Dolor de Oído/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología , Maniobra de ValsalvaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Middle ear barotrauma (MEB) is common during chamber compression in hyperbaric oxygen therapy. However, little evidence exists on an optimal compression protocol to minimize the incidence and severity of MEB. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of MEB during hyperbaric oxygen therapy using two different chamber compression protocols. DESIGN: Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hyperbaric Medicine Unit, The Townsville Hospital, Queensland, Australia, September 2012 to December 2014. PATIENTS: 100 participants undergoing their first hyperbaric oxygen therapy session. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to a staged (n=50) or a linear (n=50) compression protocols. Photographs of tympanic membranes were taken pre- and post-treatment and then graded. Middle ear barotrauma was defined as an increase of at least one grade on a modified TEED scale. RESULTS: The observed MEB incidence under the staged protocol was 48% compared to 62% using the linear protocol (P=0.12, exact one-sided binomial test), and thus the staged protocol did not show a significant improvement in MEB. However, the staged protocol resulted in significantly less severe deteriorations in MEB grades when compared to the linear protocol (P=0.028, exact one-sided Mann-Whitney type test). CONCLUSION: The use of the assessed staged compression protocol for the first hyperbaric oxygen treatment showed no significant effect on the overall incidence of MEB when compared to the gold standard linear protocol but resulted in a significant improvement in the severity of the experienced MEBs. Further studies are needed to elucidate an optimal compression protocol to minimize middle ear barotrauma.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Protocolos Clínicos , Oído Medio/lesiones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Membrana Timpánica/lesiones , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadísticas no ParamétricasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the distribution and occurrence of adverse events recorded during hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy from 2012 to 2015. In this analysis, events are defined as otic/sinus barotrauma, confinement anxiety, hypoglycemia, oxygen toxicity, pneumothorax, seizure, and shortness of breath. DATA AND ANALYSIS: The data for the analysis were drawn from a proprietary electronic health data system that contained information on 1,529,859 hyperbaric treatments administered during 53,371 treatment courses from 2012 to 2015 in outpatient wound care centers across the United States managed by Healogics, Inc, Jacksonville, Florida. RESULTS: Of the 1.5 million treatments included in the analysis, 0.68% were associated with an adverse event. Barotrauma and confinement anxiety were the most frequently reported events. Medically severe events were extremely uncommon, with fewer than 0.05 instances of oxygen toxicity per 1000 treatments and only 1 confirmed case of pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the occurrence of adverse events associated with HBO therapy is infrequent and typically not serious. The findings of this study suggest that when administered according to the appropriate therapeutic protocols HBO therapy is a safe and low-risk intervention.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Barotrauma/etiología , Sistema Nervioso Central/lesiones , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Humanos , Anamnesis/métodos , Senos Paranasales/lesiones , Trastornos Fóbicos/etiología , Examen Físico/métodos , Convulsiones/etiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is applied in a growing number of cases for patients with different comorbidities and is considered a generally safe therapy. The main side effects related to HBO2 therapy are barotrauma, central nervous system- and pulmonary oxygen toxicity, claustrophobia, anxiety and visual disturbances. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of side effects associated with HBO2 therapy and risk factors in a large cohort of patients treated for different indications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2,334 patients treated in the Sagol Center of Hyperbaric Medicine and Research, Assaf Harofeh, Israel, between June 2010 and December 2014. Patients were classified to one of three categories of indications: Category A--non-neurological indications; Category B--neurotherapeutic indications; and Category C--acute indications. RESULTS: From a total of 2,334 patients, 406 (17.4%) experienced adverse event(s) (one or more) during HBO2 therapy sessions. The overall per-session incidence was 721:100,000 events:sessions (0.72%). The main complication was middle ear barotrauma, which occurred in 9.2% of patients and in 0.04% of sessions. Females and children under the age of 16 years had increased risk for barotrauma. Other complications--hypoglycemia, oxygen toxicity, dizziness, anxiety reactions, dyspnea and chest pain--occurred in 0.5-1.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Strict operational protocols, including pre-HBO2 therapy evaluations and in-chamber monitoring, are essential and improve patient safety. When applied, HBO2 therapy can be considered one of the safest medical treatments available today.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Seguridad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Dolor en el Pecho/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Disnea/epidemiología , Oído Medio/lesiones , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Incidencia , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Convulsiones/etiología , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Decompression injuries occur on account of the special hyperbaric effects during the emerge phase and require superior therapeutic knowledge. Vitally important is emergency treatment with high concentrated oxygen at an early stage. Sever decompression injuries require oxygenation in a hyperbaric treatment chamber.