Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 134
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urol Oncol ; 42(5): 158.e11-158.e16, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365461

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer screening has routinely identified men with very low- or low-risk disease, per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Current literature has demonstrated that the most appropriate management strategy for these patients is active surveillance (AS). The mainstay of AS includes periodic biopsies and biannual prostate-specific antigen tests. However, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is uniquely posed to improve patient surveillance. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of an annual mpMRI in patients on AS, focusing on radiologic upgrading and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) trends as indicators of clinically significant disease. METHODS: This prospective, single intuition, study enrolled 208 patients on AS who had at least two biopsies and 1 mpMRI with a median follow-up of 5.03 years. The main outcome variable was time to Gleason grade (GG) reclassification. RESULTS: After delineating patients on their initial PI-RADS score, men with score 3 and 5 lesions at first MRI had comparable GG reclassification-free survival to their counterparts. Conversely, men with initial PI-RADS 4 lesions showed a lower 5-year GG reclassification-free survival compared to those with PI-RADS score 1-2. The cohort was then subset to 70 patients who obtained ≥2 mpMRIs on protocol. Men experiencing uptrending mpMRI scores had an increased risk of GG reclassification, with a 35.4% difference in 5 year GG reclassification-free survival probability on the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrates that for men on AS with stable recapitulated disease, an annual MRI may replace repeat biopsies after confirmatory sampling has been obtained. On the other hand, men who initiate AS with PI-RADS 4 and/or who display uptrending mpMRI scores require periodic biopsies along with repeat imaging. This study highlights the utility of integrating an annual MRI into AS protocols, thus promising a more effective approach to management.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Estudios Prospectivos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(4): 1223-1230, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383816

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the technique and evaluate the performance of MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access. METHODS: Ten men (mean age, 69 (range 57-86) years) without rectal access underwent 13 MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia. All patients underwent mp-MRI at our institute prior to biopsy. Three patients had prior US-guided transperineal biopsy which was unsuccessful in one, negative in one, and yielded GG1 (GS6) PCa in one. Procedure time, complications, histopathology result, and subsequent management were recorded. RESULTS: Median interval between rectal surgery and presentation with elevated PSA was 12.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 25-75, 8-36.5 years). Mean PSA was 11.9 (range, 4.8 -59.0) ng/ml and PSA density was 0.49 (0.05 -3.2) ng/ml/ml. Distribution of PI-RADS v2.0/2.1 scores of the targeted lesions were PI-RADS 5-3; PI-RADS 4-6; and PI-RADS 3-1. Mean lesion size was 1.5 cm (range, 1.0-3.6 cm). Median interval between MRI and biopsy was 5.5 months (IQR 25-75, 1.5-9 months). Mean procedure time was 47.4 min (range, 29-80 min) and the number of cores varied between 3 and 5. Of the 13 biopsies, 4 yielded clinically significant prostate cancer (csPca), with a Gleason score ≥ 7, 1 yielded insignificant prostate cancer (Gleason score = 6), 7 yielded benign prostatic tissue, and one was technically unsuccessful. 3/13 biopsies were repeat biopsies which detected csPCa in 2 out of the 3 patients. None of the patients had biopsy-related complication. Biopsy result changed management to radiation therapy with ADT in 2 patients with the rest on active surveillance. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia is feasible in patients without rectal access.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Anestesia Local , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 7(6)2023 10 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38085220

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Image-guided approaches improve the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy and frequently modify estimates of clinical risk. To better understand the impact of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) on risk assessment, we compared the distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groupings, as calculated from MRF-TB vs systematic biopsy alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 713 patients who underwent MRF-TB from January 2017 to July 2021. The primary study objective was to compare the distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings obtained using MRF-TB (systematic + targeted) vs systematic biopsy. RESULTS: Systematic biopsy alone classified 10% of samples as very low risk and 18.7% of samples as low risk, while MRF-TB classified 10.5% of samples as very low risk and 16.1% of samples as low risk. Among patients with benign findings, low-risk disease, and favorable/intermediate-risk disease on systematic biopsy alone, 4.6% of biopsies were reclassified as high risk or very high risk on MRF-TB. Of 207 patients choosing active surveillance, 64 (31%), 91 (44%), 42 (20.2%), and 10 (4.8%) patients were classified as having very low-risk, low-risk, and favorable/intermediate-risk and unfavorable/intermediate-risk criteria, respectively. When using systematic biopsy alone, 204 patients (28.7%) were classified as having either very low-risk and low-risk disease per NCCN guidelines, while 190 men (26.6%) received this classification when using MRF-TB. CONCLUSION: The addition of MRF-TB to systematic biopsy may change eligibility for active surveillance in only a small proportion of patients with prostate cancer. Our findings support the need for routine use of quantitative risk assessment over risk groupings to promote more nuanced decision making for localized cancer.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
4.
World J Urol ; 41(12): 3867-3876, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823940

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Transperineal mpMRI-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPFBx) are recommended for prostate cancer diagnosis, but little is known about their learning curve (LC), especially when performed under local anaesthesia (LA). We investigated how operators' and institutions' experience might affect biopsy results. METHODS: Baseline, procedure and pathology data of consecutive TPFBx under LA were prospectively collected at two academic Institutions, from Sep 2016 to May 2019. Main inclusion criterion was a positive MRI. Endpoints were biopsy duration, clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate on targeted cores (csCDR-T), complications, pain and urinary function. Data were analysed per-centre and per-operator (with ≥ 50 procedures), comparing groups of consecutive patient, and subsequently through regression and CUSUM analyses. Learning curves were plotted using an adjusted lowess smoothing function. RESULTS: We included 1014 patients, with 27.3% csCDR-T and a median duration was 15 min (IQR 12-18). A LC for biopsy duration was detected, with the steeper phase ending after around 50 procedures, in most operators. No reproducible evidence in favour of an impact of experience on csPCa detection was found at operator's level, whilst a possible gentle LC of limited clinical relevance emerged at Institutional level; complications, pain and IPSS variations were not related to operator experience. CONCLUSION: The implementation of TPFBx under LA was feasible, safe and efficient since early phases with a relatively short learning curve for procedure time.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patología , Curva de Aprendizaje , Anestesia Local , Estudios Prospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Dolor
5.
Urology ; 182: 33-39, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742847

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of performing transperineal prostate biopsy in the office setting using the novel anesthetic technique of tumescent local anesthesia. We report anxiety, pain, and embarrassment of patients who underwent this procedure compared to patients who underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy using standard local anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing either a transperineal prostate biopsy under tumescent local anesthesia or a transrectal prostate biopsy with standard local anesthetic technique were prospectively enrolled. The tumescent technique employed dilute lidocaine solution administered using a self-filling syringe. Patients were asked to rate their pain before, during, and after their procedure using a visual analog scale. Patient anxiety and embarrassment was assessed using the Testing Modalities Index Questionnaire. RESULTS: Between April 2021 and June 2022, 430 patients underwent a transperineal prostate biopsy using tumescent local anesthesia and 65 patients underwent a standard transrectal prostate biopsy. Patients who underwent a transperineal biopsy had acceptable but significantly higher pain scores than those who underwent a transrectal prostate biopsy (3.9 vs 1.6, P-value <.01). These scores fell to almost zero immediately following their procedure. Additionally, transperineal biopsy patients were more likely to experience anxiety (71% vs 45%, P < .01) and embarrassment (32% vs 15%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Transperineal biopsy using local tumescent anesthesia is safe and well-tolerated. Despite the benefits, patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under tumescent anesthesia still experienced worse procedural pain, anxiety, and embarrassment. Additional studies examining other adjunctive interventions to improve patient experience during transperineal prostate biopsy are needed.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patología , Anestesia Local/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/prevención & control , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos
6.
Radiographics ; 43(10): e220151, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37676826

RESUMEN

Breast imaging radiologists regularly perform image-guided biopsies of suspicious breast lesions based on features that are associated with a likelihood of malignancy ranging from 2% to greater than 95% (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 4 and 5). As diagnostic partners, pathologists perform histopathologic assessment of these tissue samples to confirm a diagnosis. Correlating the imaging findings with the histopathologic results is an integral aspect of multidisciplinary breast care. Assessment of radiologic-pathologic concordance is vital in guiding appropriate management, as it enables identification of discordant results, minimizing the chance of misdiagnosis. Undersampling can lead to false-negative results, with the frequencies of false-negative diagnoses varying on the basis of multiple factors, including biopsy type (eg, core needle, vacuum-assisted needle), needle gauge, and type of lesion sampled at biopsy (ie, mass, calcifications, asymmetry, architectural distortion). Improving a radiologist's knowledge of macroscopic and microscopic breast anatomy and more common breast diseases and their expected imaging findings ensures more accurate radiologic-pathologic correlation and management recommendations. The histopathologic and molecular characteristics of biopsy-sampled breast lesions aid in making an accurate diagnosis. Hematoxylin-eosin staining provides critical morphologic details, whereas immunohistochemical staining enables molecular characterization of many benign and malignant lesions, which is critical for tailored treatment. The authors review commonly encountered benign and malignant breast diseases, their corresponding histopathologic phenotypes, and the histopathologic markers that are essential to clinching the diagnosis of these entities. As part of a multidisciplinary team that provides optimal patient care, radiologists should be knowledgeable of the foundations of histopathologic diagnosis and the implications for patient management to ensure appropriate radiologic-pathologic concordance. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Mama , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Eosina Amarillenta-(YS) , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Agujas , Fenotipo
7.
Urologie ; 62(11): 1160-1168, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37666944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has gained importance and plays a crucial role in both personalized diagnostics and increasingly in the treatment planning for patients with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to present established and innovative applications of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, it will explore alternative approaches and compare them in a comprehensive manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review on the application of mpMRI for biopsy and therapy planning was conducted. RESULTS: The integration of modern imaging techniques, especially mpMRI, into the diagnostic algorithm has revolutionized prostate cancer diagnosis. MRI and MRI-guided biopsy detect more significant prostate cancer, with the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies and the diagnosis of clinically insignificant carcinomas. In addition, MRI provides crucial information for risk stratification and treatment planning in prostate cancer patients, both before radical prostatectomy and during active surveillance. CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI offers significant added value for the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. The advancement of MRI analysis, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence algorithms, holds the potential for further enhancing imaging diagnostics.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos
8.
J Surg Oncol ; 128(8): 1428-1436, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37638388

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a lytic benign bone lesion representing about 1% of all primary bone tumors. Method to treat ABC's have developed over time. The standard of care cure for ABC has been curettage with or without bone grafting of the defect but is burdened by recurrence rates of approximately 25%-31%. Based on the assumption that ABCs usually supplied by one or more pathological feeding arteries, selective arterial embolization has been described as an adjuvant preoperative procedure to reduce intra-operative hemorrhage, and as primary treatment for lesions in difficult surgical access. In the current study, we therefore asked whether (1) a single or a repeat selective arterial embolization (SAE) for treating ABCs would produce comparable healing rates compared with curettage and bone grafting; (2) evaluated the relationship of recurrence in relation to the site of the cyst, the age, and gender of the patients; and (3) the two techniques differ in term of long-term complication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 265 patients who underwent curettage and bone grafting or SAE performed at our institute from 1994 to 2018. The diagnosis of ABC was always established with percutaneous CT-guided biopsy or open biopsy. Patients were followed clinically with plain radiographs or CT scan at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months then annually in the absence of symptoms. Treatment success was determined evaluating pre- and postprocedural imaging according to Chang classification. RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen were treated with curettage and bone grafting (curettage group), and 46 with SAE Group. Of the 219 patients treated with Curettage and bone grafting (curettage group), 165 out of 219 (75.3%) experienced bone healing, while local recurrence was observed in 54 cases (24.7%) after 12 months on average (range: 3-120 months) from surgery. After the first SAE, bone ossification was seen in 27 (58.7%), without needing any further treatment. Eleven recurred patients were treated with SAE (four patients need two while seven need three SAE to heal), and eight patients with curettage and bone grafting. Thirty-eight out of 46 (82%) patients experienced bone ossification regardless the number of SAE. The overall rate of local recurrence for all patients was 26.7%. SAE group presented a lower complication rate (6%) where two patients experienced skin necrosis, and one limb-length discrepancies (2% of all cohort). DISCUSSION: The use of SAE is an attractive option to treat ABC as it combines on one hand a lower complication rate than curettage and bone grafting, on the other it can be carried out in case of nonresectable ABCs, significantly reducing the size of viable ABC lesions, fostering bone remodeling and mineralization, and most importantly, significantly improving the patient's quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos , Trasplante Óseo , Humanos , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/cirugía , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Legrado/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen
9.
Radiol Oncol ; 57(2): 158-167, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37341197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While computed tomography (CT)-guided liver biopsies are commonly performed using unenhanced images, contrast-enhanced images are beneficial for challenging puncture pathways and lesion locations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CT-guided biopsies for intrahepatic lesions using unenhanced, intravenous (IV)-enhanced, or intra-arterial Lipiodol-marked CT for lesion marking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six-hundred-seven patients (men: 358 [59.0%], mean age 61 years; SD ±12.04) with suspect hepatic lesions and CT-guided liver biopsies were retrospectively evaluated. Successful biopsies were histopathological findings other than typical liver tissue or non-specific findings. Data was ascertained regarding the use of contrast medium for the biopsy-planning CT, unenhanced (group 1) vs. Lipiodol (group 2) vs. IV contrast (group 3). Technical success and influencing factors were insulated. Complications were noted. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Man-Whitney t-test, Chi-square test, and Spearman-Rho. RESULTS: Overall lesion hitting rate was 73.1%, with significantly better rates using Lipiodol-marked lesions (79.3%) compared to group 1 (73.8%) and group 3 (65.2%) (p = 0.037). Smaller lesions (<20 mm diameter) benefited significantly from Lipiodol-marking with 71.2% successful biopsy rate compared to group 1 (65.5%) and group 3 (47.7%) (p = 0.021). Liver cirrhosis (p = 0.94) and entity of parenchymal lesions (p = 0.78) had no impact on the hitting rate between the groups. No major complications occurred during the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-biopsy Lipiodol marking of suspect hepatic lesions significantly increases the lesion-hitting rate and is especially beneficial for biopsy of smaller targets below 20 mm diameter. Further, Lipiodol marking is superior to IV contrast for non-visible lesions in unenhanced CT. Target lesion entity has no impact on the hitting rate.


Asunto(s)
Aceite Etiodizado , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Urologie ; 62(5): 473-478, 2023 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930234

RESUMEN

The clinical and histological diagnosis of prostate cancer is a crucial aspect of the routine work of a urologist. The high prevalence of multiresistant microorganisms leads to an increased incidence of sepsis after transrectal prostate biopsy. It requires a switch from the still gold-standard method to the transperineal fusion biopsy procedure after multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This article provides an overview of the most important differences between the two methods and gives a detailed methodological description of transperineal fusion biopsy under local anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anestesia Local , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos
12.
BMC Urol ; 23(1): 39, 2023 Mar 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36934231

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transperineal prostate biopsy is gradually becoming the standard methodology for diagnosing prostate cancer because of its high accuracy and low risk of infection, but careful preparation is not always highlighted before a transperineal biopsy. we reported two cases of hair embedding during transurethral resection of the prostate following transperineal puncture biopsy with a Bard MC1820 disposable biopsy needle. Histological examination did not find the hair follicle structure required for hair growth. The hair source was suspected to be percutaneously brought in by needle during the biopsya simulated experiment was used to analyze and reconstruct the process of hair embedding in prostate tissue. CONCLUSION: Hair embedding caused by perineal prostate biopsy is a consumable-related adverse event, and skin preparation before a transperineal prostate biopsy is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Perineo/cirugía , Cabello/patología , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos
14.
Eur Urol ; 83(3): 249-256, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36604276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now standard for assessment of suspected prostate cancer (PCa). A variety of approaches to MRI-based targeting has revolutionised prostate biopsies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the procedure and show the accuracy and tolerability of a novel Vector MRI/ultrasound fusion transperineal (TP) biopsy technique that uses electromagnetic (EM) needle tracking under local anaesthesia (LA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Vector prostate biopsy using BiopSee fusion software, EM tracking technology, and transrectal ultrasound was performed in 69 patients meeting the biopsy criteria in two UK centres between September 2020 and August 2022. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Stepper-mounted rectal ultrasound images were fused with MRI scans. LA was applied into two defined perineal tracks and a needle sheath with an EM sensor was inserted. The biopsy needle was directed precisely through the sheath to MRI targets under EM tracking. Biopsies were taken without antibiotic prophylaxis. MEASUREMENTS: Cancer detection (any PCa; grade group ≥2), side effects, and patient experience measures were recorded. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Cancer detection in patients with Likert 4-5 lesions was 98% for any PCa and 83% for grade group ≥2. According to the 50 questionnaires returned, 42 patients (84%) reported no or minimal pain, while 40 (80%) reported no or minimal discomfort. No episodes of postoperative urinary retention occurred, and only one patient required treatment for infection. Limitations include the low patient number and incomplete responses to questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: This novel Vector technique provides a feasible and tolerable procedure for MRI/ultrasound fusion TP biopsy under LA, with high cancer detection rates. This is achieved while maintaining patient comfort and with minimal rates of complications. PATIENT SUMMARY: We report a novel technique that uses electromagnetic needle tracking to perform highly accurate and comfortable prostate biopsies through the perineum under local anaesthetic.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Anestesia Local , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos
15.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(2): 694-703, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399208

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy, safety, and efficiency of an MRI-TRUS fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy method in an outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. METHODS: Patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy were included from March 2021 to May 2022. Biopsies were performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting, using specialised fusion software. Primary outcome was (clinically significant) cancer detection rate. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, patient discomfort during the procedure and complication rate. RESULTS: We included 203 male patients (69 years +-SD 8.2) with PI-RADS score > 2. In total 223 suspicious lesions were targeted. Overall cancer detection rate and clinically significant cancer detection rate were 73.5% and 60.1%, respectively. (Clinically significant) cancer detection rates in PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions were 46.4% (23.2%), 78.5% (66.1%) and 93.5% (89.1%), respectively. Mean duration of the procedure including fusion, targeted and systematic biopsies was 22.5 min. Patients rated injection of local anaesthesia on a numeric pain rating scale on average 3.7/10 (SD 2.09) and biopsy core sampling 1.6/10 (SD 1.65). No patient presented with acute urinary retention on follow-up consultation. Two (1%) patients presented with infectious complications. Four (2%) patients experienced a vasovagal reaction. CONCLUSION: Transperineal targeted biopsy with MRI-TRUS fusion software has high overall and clinically significant cancer detection rates. The method is well tolerated under local anaesthesia and in an outpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Anestesia Local , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
16.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 5(11): e648-e659, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite highly effective targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, about 40% of patients respond poorly, and predictive biomarkers for treatment choices are lacking. We did a biopsy-driven trial to compare the response to rituximab, etanercept, and tocilizumab in biologic-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified for synovial B cell status. METHODS: STRAP and STRAP-EU were two parallel, open-label, biopsy-driven, stratified, randomised, phase 3 trials done across 26 university centres in the UK and Europe. Biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were included. Following ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy, patients were classified as B cell poor or B cell rich according to synovial B cell signatures and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravenous rituximab (1000 mg at week 0 and week 2), subcutaneous tocilizumab (162 mg per week), or subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg per week). The primary outcome was the 16-week ACR20 response in the B cell-poor, intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients), with data pooled from the two trials, comparing etanercept and tocilizumab (grouped) versus rituximab. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2014-003529-16 (STRAP) and 2017-004079-30 (STRAP-EU). FINDINGS: Between June 8, 2015, and July 4, 2019, 226 patients were randomly assigned to etanercept (n=73), tocilizumab (n=74), and rituximab (n=79). Three patients (one in each group) were excluded after randomisation because they received parenteral steroids in the 4 weeks before recruitment. 168 (75%) of 223 patients in the intention-to-treat population were women and 170 (76%) were White. In the B cell-poor population, ACR20 response at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) showed no significant differences between etanercept and tocilizumab grouped together and rituximab (46 [60%] of 77 patients vs 26 [59%] of 44; odds ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·47-2·17], p=0·97). No differences were observed for adverse events, including serious adverse events, which occurred in six (6%) of 102 patients in the rituximab group, nine (6%) of 108 patients in the etanercept group, and three (4%) of 73 patients in the tocilizumab group (p=0·53). INTERPRETATION: In this biologic-naive population of patients with rheumatoid arthrtitis, the dichotomic classification into synovial B cell poor versus rich did not predict treatment response to B cell depletion with rituximab compared with alternative treatment strategies. However, the lack of response to rituximab in patients with a pauci-immune pathotype and the higher risk of structural damage progression in B cell-rich patients treated with rituximab warrant further investigations into the ability of synovial tissue analyses to inform disease pathogenesis and treatment response. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council and Versus Arthritis.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Biológica , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico
17.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 19(12): 1312-1321, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36244674

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess radiologists' contribution to variation in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary, academic, National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center with a multidisciplinary prostate cancer program. Men undergoing mpMRI examinations from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, with elevated PSA (≥4 ng/mL) and biopsy within 6 months pre- or post-MRI or prostatectomy within 6 months post-mpMRI were included. Univariate and multivariable hierarchical logistic regression assessed impact of patient, provider, mpMRI examination, mpMRI report, and pathology factors on the diagnosis of Grade Group ≥ 2 csPCa. RESULTS: Study cohort included 960 MRIs in 928 men, mean age 64.0 years (SD ± 7.4), and 59.8% (555 of 928) had csPCa. Interpreting radiologist was not significant individually (P > .999) or combined with mpMRI ordering physician and physician performing biopsy or prostatectomy (P = .41). Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 2 (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, P = .04), PI-RADS category 4 (OR 2.52, P < .001), and PI-RADS category 5 (OR 4.99, P < .001) assessment compared with no focal lesion; PSA density of 0.1 to 0.15 ng/mL/cc (OR 2.46, P < .001), 0.15 to 0.2 ng/mL/cc (OR 2.77, P < .001), or ≥0.2 ng/mL/cc (OR 4.52, P < .001); private insurance (reference = Medicare, OR 0.52, P = .001), and unambiguous extraprostatic extension on mpMRI (OR 2.94, P = .01) were independently associated with csPCa. PI-RADS 3 assessment (OR 1.18, P = .56), age (OR 0.99, P = .39), and African American race (OR 0.90, P = .75) were not. DISCUSSION: Although there is known in-practice variation in radiologists' interpretation of mpMRI, in our multidisciplinary prostate cancer program we found no significant radiologist-attributable variation in csPCa detection.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medicare , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen
18.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 82(3): 452-455, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639070

RESUMEN

Bleeding is the most common complication after a prostate biopsy, commonly self-limited. We describe a case of a patient who developed a hemoperitoneum after a transperineal prostate biopsy. A 65-year-old man with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed in 2016 by transurethral resection, with no further urologic control until 2020 when a rise in the serum prostate-specific antigen was diagnosed: 4.49 ng/ml. Prostate digital rectal examination had no pathologic findings. Magnetic resonance imaging informed anequivocal lesion. A target transperineal fusion biopsy was performed, guided by ultrasound (US). Pre-surgical blood tests, including coagulogram, were normal. No immediate postoperative complications were recorded, and the patient was discharged. Hours later, he returned after a head concussion due to orthostatic hypotension and diffuse abdominal pain. Blood test showed a drop in hematocrit and hemoglobin values. Abdominal US and abdominopelvic computed tomography scan showed free intraperitoneal fluid and intraperitoneal hematic collection on top of the bladder of 104 × 86 mm with no active bleeding. The patient was admitted to intensive care unit due to persistent hypotension despite fluid restoration. He received a single-unit blood transfusion and had a good response to vasopressors. Abdominal pain decreased. He was finally discharged with stable hematocrit 48hours after admission. Clinical management with no surgery or radiologic angio-embolization was required. We found no clear origin of the intraperitoneal bleeding, but we hypothesize that maybe the previous transurethral resection of the prostate made anatomical changes that facilitated blood passage to the abdominal cavity after puncture of branches from the inferior vesical artery.


La complicación más frecuente tras una biopsia prostática es el sangrado, generalmente autolimitado. Aquí describimos un caso de hemoperitoneo secundario a dicho procedimiento. Hombre de 65 años con antecedentes de cáncer de próstata diagnosticado en 2016 por una resección transuretral de próstata, sin seguimiento urológico, consultó en 2020 por aumento del antígeno prostático específico: 4.49 ng/ml, asociado a tacto rectal normal y una resonancia multiparamétrica de próstata mostró una lesión indeterminada. Se realizó una biopsia prostática transperineal por fusión guiado por ecografía. Los análisis preoperatorios, incluido coagulograma, eran normales. No se registraron complicaciones intraquirúrgicas y se indicó el alta. Horas más tarde, consultó al hospital por hipotensión ortostática y dolor abdominal difuso. Los análisis demostraron caída del hematocrito y hemoglobina. Una ecografía y posterior tomografía computada evidenciaron una colección supravesical de 104 × 86mm sin signos de sangrado activo. Se indicó internación en sala de cuidados intensivos debido a hipotensión refractaria a expansiones con requerimiento de vasopresores. Recibió una transfusión de glóbulos rojos. Por favorable evolución, 48 horas después del ingreso recibió el alta. En este caso, fue posible un manejo conservador, sin requerimiento de cirugía o embolización. Si bien no se encontró sitio exacto del sangrado, creemos que la resección transuretral previa podría haber generado cambios anatómicos que facilitaran el pasaje de sangre, posiblemente proveniente de ramas de la arteria vesical inferior a cavidad abdominal luego de la punción.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Dolor Abdominal/patología , Anciano , Hemoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoperitoneo/etiología , Hemoperitoneo/patología , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
19.
Urology ; 167: 165-170, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533767

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate specific imaging and patient-related factors associated with a false negative (FN) MRI-targeted prostate fusion biopsies (TBx) of suspicious MRI lesions. METHODS: Retrospective study of men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions November, 2015-December 2020 with TBx and systematic biopsy (SBx) performed. Only FN and true positive (TP) targeted lesions were included. FN biopsy was defined as a negative TBx with a positive systematic core in the ROI or perilesional sextant. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of patient and imaging-specific factors with the probability of a FN TBx. RESULTS: 361 PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions in 304 patients, including 67 FN (19%) and 294 TP (81%) were included. There was a significant inverse association between lesion size (OR: 0.94, P-value: .02), presence of a suspicious DRE (OR: 0.36, P-value: .02) and PSA density (OR: 0.01, P-value: .004) on the probability of obtaining a FN TBx. There was no association between age, biopsy indication, use of an enema before MRI, prostate size, or discrepant US and MRI segmentation volumes on the probability of a FN TBx. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, SBx detected 19% of csPCa missed on TBx. Smaller PI-RADS 4/5 lesions, lower PSAD values, and a normal DRE were all associated with an increased probability of a FN TBx.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 47(7): 2494-2499, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583821

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate whether use of an enema prep reduces the false-negative (FN) rate of PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1108 consecutive patients with a PI-RADS 1 MRI performed 01/2016-09/2021 were retrospectively collected. Patient charts were examined for subsequent systematic prostate biopsy performed within 1 year if positive or anytime thereafter if negative. Patients without biopsy were excluded. Use of an enema prep 1-2 h before MRI, which was implemented in 03/2019, was recorded. FN rate of MRI for detection of csPCa, defined as Gleason score ≥ 7, using systematic biopsy was assessed per patient and compared between those with and without an enema prep. Χ2 test and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: 255 patients (median age 64, IQR 58-69) with median PSA 5.6 (IQR 4.2-8.1), PI-RADS 1 MRI, and subsequent biopsy were included in the analysis. 66 patients (26%) had an enema prep and 189 patients (74%) did not. 7 (11%) patients with and 21 (11%) patients without enema prep had a FN biopsy. There was no significant association between enema prep and FN biopsy (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.38-2.35, p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an enema prep prior to prostate MRI did not decrease the FN rate of PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Enema , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA