Immunomodulatory Effect of SINA 1.2 Therapy Protocol in Asthmatic Mice Model: A Combination of Oxymel and Sauna.

Alternative medicine, has become popular in asthmatic patients. We evaluated the immunomodulatory effects of SINA 1.2 therapy protocol derived from Persian medicine in an asthmatic mice model. Forty-two male BALB/c mice divided into six groups: one control (sham) and five sensitized groups (by parenteral injection of 20 µg ovalbumin in 100 µL normal saline plus 50 µL alum on days 1 and 14). Sensitized groups were as: untreated, budesonide (1 mg nebulized budesonide: 200 µg/puff every 5 min for 25 min), dry sauna (30 min, 37°C), oral oxymel (gavaged: 0.2 mL of the syrup plus 0.8 mL of water), and SINA protocol No.1.2 (oxymel followed by sauna) groups. Treatments were given for 10 days from day 23 to 33 then sacrificed. Significant gene expression reduction of interleukin(IL)-4, IL-5, and MUC5AC and increase of interferon(IFN)-γ and IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio and decreased perivascular and peribronchial inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and subsequent mucus hypersecretion in SINA group were seen compared to untreated group. SINA lowered IL-5 and MUC5AC gene expression levels similar to the budesonide and acted better than budesonide in increasing IFN-γ gene expression up to normal level. Compared with the asthma group, sauna alone only affected MUC5AC and IFN-γ gene expressions and oxymel alone, only reduced IL-4 gene expression, perivascular and peribronchial inflammation, and mucus hypersecretion. It seems that SINA therapy alleviates asthma via immune modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and improvement of pathological changes in ovalbumin-induced asthma in mice, supporting the notion of innate healing power mentioned in Persian medicine literature.

Efficacy and safety of modified Bushen Yiqi formulas (MBYF) as an add-on to formoterol and budesonide in the management of COPD: study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial: FB-MBYF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled glucocorticoid corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting ß2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA), and other drugs have limited therapeutic effects on COPD with significant individual differences. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-modified Bushen Yiqi formula (MBYF) demonstrates advantages in COPD management in China. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBYF as an add-on to budesonide/formoterol in COPD patients and confirm the related genes affecting the therapeutic effect in the treatment of COPD. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, eligible patients with COPD will randomly receive a 360-day placebo or MBYF as an adjuvant to budesonide/formoterol in a 1:1 ratio and be followed up with every 2 months. The primary outcomes will be the frequency, times, and severity of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), COPD assessment test (CAT) score, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The secondary outcomes will include the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale, 6-min walking test (6MWT), BODE index, quantitative scores of syndromes classified in TCM, inflammation indices, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenaline (HPA) axis function. We will also test the genotype to determine the relationship between drugs and efficacy. All the data will be recorded in case report forms (CRFs) and analysed by SPSS V.20.0. DISCUSSION: A randomized clinical trial design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MBYF in COPD is described. The results will provide evidence for the combination therapy of modern medicine and TCM medicine, and individual therapy for COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID:  ChiCTR1900026124 , Prospective registration.

Evaluation of Medication Adherence and Rescue Medication Use in Non-Exacerbating Patients with COPD Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Budesonide/Formoterol as Initial Maintenance Therapy.

Background: Adherence to inhaled maintenance therapy is critical to managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while increasing rescue medication usage may indicate worsening symptoms. This study evaluated adherence and rescue medication use in patients with COPD without a history of exacerbation who initiated combination therapy with budesonide/formoterol (B/F) or umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI). Methods: Retrospective observational study of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage with Part D enrollees who initiated UMEC/VI or B/F between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017 (earliest fill defined as index date). Eligibility criteria included age ≥40 years, 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index, ≥1 pre-index COPD diagnosis, no pre-index asthma diagnosis, COPD-related exacerbations, or medication fills containing inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting ß2-agonists, or long-acting muscarinic antagonists. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment groups on potential confounders. Medication adherence (primary endpoint) was evaluated by the proportion of days covered (PDC). Rescue medication use (secondary endpoint) was standardized to canister equivalents (1 metered dose inhaler [200 puffs] or ~100 nebulized doses of short-acting ß2-agonist- and/or short-acting muscarinic agonist-containing medication). Results: After IPTW, covariates were balanced between cohorts (UMEC/VI: N=4082; B/F: N=9529). UMEC/VI initiators had a significantly greater mean PDC (UMEC/VI: 0.47 [0.33]; B/F: 0.38 [0.30]; P<0.001) and significantly higher rates of adherence (PDC≥0.80) than B/F initiators (UMEC/VI: n=1004 [25%], B/F: n=1391 [15%]; relative risk: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.57, 1.81; P<0.001). In the year following initiation, UMEC/VI initiators filled significantly fewer rescue medication canister equivalents than B/F initiators (predicted mean [95% CI]: 1.78 [1.69, 1.88] vs 2.15 [2.08, 2.23]; mean difference [95% CI]: -0.37 [-0.50, -0.24]; P<0.001), corresponding to 17% less (estimated) rescue medication use (incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.78, 0.88]). Conclusion: Among non-exacerbating patients with COPD initiating dual therapy, UMEC/VI demonstrated improved adherence and reduced rescue medication use compared with B/F.

Triple Inhaled Therapy at Two Glucocorticoid Doses in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD.

BACKGROUND: Triple fixed-dose regimens of an inhaled glucocorticoid, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been studied at single dose levels of inhaled glucocorticoid, but studies at two dose levels are lacking. METHODS: In a 52-week, phase 3, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy at two dose levels of inhaled glucocorticoid in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and at least one exacerbation in the past year, we assigned patients in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive twice-daily inhaled doses of triple therapy (inhaled glucocorticoid [320 µg or 160 µg of budesonide], a LAMA [18 µg of glycopyrrolate], and a LABA [9.6 µg of formoterol]) or one of two dual therapies (18 µg of glycopyrrolate plus 9.6 µg of formoterol or 320 µg of budesonide plus 9.6 µg of formoterol). The primary end point was the annual rate (the estimated mean number per patient per year) of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, as analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population with the use of on-treatment data only. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 8509 patients. The annual rates of moderate or severe exacerbations were 1.08 in the 320-µg-budesonide triple-therapy group (2137 patients), 1.07 in the 160-µg-budesonide triple-therapy group (2121 patients), 1.42 in the glycopyrrolate-formoterol group (2120 patients), and 1.24 in the budesonide-formoterol group (2131 patients). The rate was significantly lower with 320-µg-budesonide triple therapy than with glycopyrrolate-formoterol (24% lower: rate ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.83; P<0.001) or budesonide-formoterol (13% lower: rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95; P = 0.003). Similarly, the rate was significantly lower with 160-µg-budesonide triple therapy than with glycopyrrolate-formoterol (25% lower: rate ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.83; P<0.001) or budesonide-formoterol (14% lower: rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95; P = 0.002). The incidence of any adverse event was similar across the treatment groups (range, 61.7 to 64.5%); the incidence of confirmed pneumonia ranged from 3.5 to 4.5% in the groups that included inhaled glucocorticoid use and was 2.3% in the glycopyrrolate-formoterol group. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy with twice-daily budesonide (at either the 160-µg or 320-µg dose), glycopyrrolate, and formoterol resulted in a lower rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations than glycopyrrolate-formoterol or budesonide-formoterol. (Funded by AstraZeneca, ETHOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02465567.).

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear. Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation (a probiotic formulation) participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION: At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

ANTECEDENTES: La reservoritis ocurre en aproximadamente el 50% de los pacientes después de la anastomosis entre la bolsa ileal y el ano (IPAA, por sus siglas en inglés) para la colitis ulcerosa crónica (CU). OBJETIVOS: El objetivo primario fue determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de los tratamientos médicos para la prevención o el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se hicieron búsquedas en MEDLINE, Embase y en CENTRAL, desde su inicio hasta el 25 julio 2018. También se buscó en las listas de referencias, registros de ensayos en curso y actas de congresos. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se consideraron para inclusión los ensayos controlados aleatorios de prevención o tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica en adultos a los que se les realiza IPAA para la CU. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión, de forma independiente, evaluaron la elegibilidad de los estudios, extrajeron los datos y analizaron el riesgo de sesgo. La calidad de la evidencia se evaluó mediante los criterios GRADE. El resultado primario la mejoría clínica o remisión en los pacientes con reservoritis aguda o crónica, o la proporción de pacientes sin episodios de reservoritis después de IPAA. Se incluyeron los eventos adversos como resultado secundario. Se calculó el cociente de riesgos (CR) y el intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% correspondiente para los resultados dicotómicos. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron 15 estudios (547 participantes). Cuatro estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda. Cinco estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis crónica. Seis estudios evaluaron la prevención de la reservoritis. Tres estudios presentaban bajo de riesgo de sesgo. En tres estudios el riesgo fue alto y en los otros estudios fue poco claro. reservoritis aguda: Todos los pacientes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (7/7) lograron la remisión a las dos semanas en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los pacientes que recibieron metronidazol (CR 2,68; IC del 95%: 1,13 a 6,35) (evidencia de certeza muy baja). Ninguno de los participantes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (0/7) presentó eventos adversos en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol (CR0,18; IC del 95%: 0,01 a 2,98; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron vómitos, disgeusia o neuropatía periférica transitoria. El 40% (6/14) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol lograron la remisión a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 50% (6/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,37 a 1,96; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 50% (7/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol mejoraron clínicamente a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 58% (7/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,42 a 1,74; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 57% (8/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol presentaron eventos adversos en comparación con el 25% (3/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 2,29; IC del 95%: 0,78 a 6,73; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron anorexia, náuseas, cefalea, astenia, sabor metálico, vómitos, parestesia y depresión. El 25% (2/8) de los participantes que recibieron rifaximina lograron la remisión a las 4semanas en comparación con el 0% (0/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 6,11; IC del 95%: 0,33 a 111,71; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 38% (3/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina mejoraron clínicamente a las 4 semanas en comparación con el 30% (3/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,25; IC del 95%: 0,34 a 4,60; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 75% (6/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina presentaron un evento adverso en comparación con el 50% (5/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,50; IC del 95%: 0,72 a 3,14; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron diarrea, flatulencias, náuseas, proctalgia, vómitos, sed, cándida, infección de las vías respiratorias superiores, aumento de las enzimas hepáticas y cefalea en racimos. El 10% (1/10) de los participantes del grupo de Lactobacillus GGmejoraron clínicamente a las 12 semanas en comparación con el 0% (0/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 3,00; IC del 95%: 0,14 a 65,90; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Reservoritis crónica: El 85% (34/40) de los pacientes que recibieron la formulación De Simone mantuvieron la remisión de nueve a 12 meses en comparación con el 3% (1/36) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 20,24; IC del 95%: 4,28 a 95,81; dos estudios; evidencia de certeza baja). El 2% (1/40) de los participantes que recibieron la fórmula De Simone presentaron un evento adverso, en comparación con el 0% (0/36) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 2,43; IC del 95%: 0,11 a 55,89; evidencia de certeza baja). Los efectos secundarios incluyeron cólicos abdominales, vómitos y diarrea. Cuarenta y tres por ciento (3/6) de los pacientes en el grupo de adalimumab lograron una mejoría clínica a las 4 semanas en comparación con un 43 (3/7) de los pacientes del grupo de placebo (CR 1,17, IC del 95%: 0,36 a 3,76; evidencia de certeza baja). El 60% (6/10) de los participantes del grupo de glutamina mantuvieron la remisión a las 3 semanas en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,80; IC del 95%: 0,63 a 5,16; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 45% (9/20) de los participantes del grupo de enema de espuma de carbómero de bismuto mejoraron clínicamente a las 3 semanas en comparación con el 45% (9/20) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,00; IC del 95%: 0,50 a 1,98; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 25% (5/20) de los participantes del grupo de aceite de cannabis presentaron un evento adverso en comparación con el 35% (7/20) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 0,71; IC del 95%: 0,27 a 1,88; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron diarrea, síntomas de empeoramiento, cólicos, sinusitis y dolor abdominal. Prevención: A los 12 meses, el 90% (18/20) de los pacientes que recibieron la formulación De Simone no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda en comparación con el 60% (12/20) de los pacientes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,50: IC del 95%: 1,02 a 2,21; evidencia de certeza baja). Otro estudio halló que el 100% (16/16) de los participantes que recibieron la fórmula De Simone no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 12 meses en comparación con el 92% (11/12) de los pacientes del grupo control sin tratamiento (CR 1,10: IC del 95%: 0,89 a 1,36; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 86% (6/7) de los participantes del grupo de Bifidobacterium longum no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 6 meses en comparación con el 60% (3/5) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,43; IC del 95%: 0,66 a 3,11; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 11% (1/9) de los participantes del grupo de Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI no presentaron episodios de reservoritis aguda a los 24 meses en comparación con el 50% (4/8) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 0,22; IC del 95%: 0,03 a 1,60; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 46% (43/94) de los participantes del grupo de alopurinol no presentaron episodios de reservoritis a los 24 meses en comparación con el 43% (39/90) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR1,06; IC del 95%: 0,76 a 1,46; evidencia de certeza baja). El 81% (21/26) de los participantes del grupo de tinidazol no presentaron episodios de reservoritis a los 12 meses en comparación con el 58% (7/12) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,38; IC del 95%: 0,83 a 2,31; evidencia de certeza muy baja). CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: No se conocen los efectos de los antibióticos, probióticos y otras intervenciones para el tratamiento y la prevención de la reservoritis. Se necesitan estudios bien diseñados con poder estadístico suficiente para determinar la forma óptima de tratamiento y prevención de la reservoritis.

Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear.Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence).Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of placebo participants (RR 20.24, 95% CI 4.28 to 95.81, 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Two per cent (1/40) of De Simone Formulation participants had an AE compared to 0% (0/36) of placebo participants (RR 2.43, 95% CI 0.11 to 55.89; low certainty evidence). AEs included abdominal cramps, vomiting and diarrhea. Fifty per cent (3/6) of adalimumab patients achieved clinical improvement at 4 weeks compared to 43% (3/7) of placebo participants (RR, 1.17, 95% CI 0.36 to 3.76, low certainty evidence). Sixty per cent (6/10) of glutamine participants maintained remission at 3 weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of butyrate participants (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 5.16, very low certainty evidence). Forty-five per cent (9/20) of patients treated with bismuth carbomer foam enema improved clinically at 3 weeks compared to 45% (9/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.98, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-five per cent (5/20) of participants in the bismuth carbomer foam enema group had an AE compared to 35% (7/20) of placebo participants (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.88, very low certainty evidence). Adverse events included diarrhea, worsening symptoms, cramping, sinusitis, and abdominal pain. PREVENTION: At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Risk of osteoporosis in microscopic colitis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with microscopic colitis (MC) have several risk factors for osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in MC is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate bone mineral status in MC. METHODS: Patients with MC and disease activity within the last 2 years were included. Bone turnover markers were analyzed and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at inclusion and after one year. Medical history, demographics, risk factors for osteoporosis, disease activity and treatment with cumulative budesonide dosage at least 3 years before inclusion was registered. Adrenal function was tested by adrenocortico-tropic hormone (ACTH) and an ACTH stimulation test at inclusion. Results were compared with age and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: Fifty MC patients (44 women) were included. Median age 67 (range 45-93); median disease duration 28 month (range 2-163); median cumulative budesonide dosage 702 mg (range 0-5400). No difference in number of patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia and BMD was detected between groups. The bone mineral formation marker specific alkaline phosphatase was lower in MC than controls 12 (5-69) µg/l versus 16 (10-35) µg/l (p < 0.005). Patients more often smoked (34% versus 10%, p = 0.001). Disease duration and cumulative budesonide dose was associated with lower BMD and T-score in hip (Spearman's rho; p < 0.05) with a cut of point of 2500 mg budesonide predicting osteopenia. Budesonide treatment did not affect adrenal gland function. CONCLUSION: The risk of osteoporosis in patients with MC is not increased. However, DXA scan is recommended in MC patients with known risk factors or active disease requiring longstanding budesonide treatment. Supplementation of calcium and vitamin-D in patients treated with budesonide is recommended.

[Considerations on the treatment of IgA nephropathy on the basis of the results of the latest studies (STOP-IgAN, TESTING, NEFIGAN)]. / Terápiás megfontolások IgA-nephropathiában a legutolsó vizsgálatok (STOP-IgAN, TESTING, NEFIGAN) eredményei alapján.

IgA nephropathy is an immune-mediated chronic glomerulonephritis with a great variability in clinical presentation and outcome. The disease can progress to end-stage renal failure in 25% of patients. For this reason we should identify patients with potential to progress. Most important risk factors for progression are persistent proteinuria, hypertension, decreased renal function and some histological lesions. The actually suggested treatment is summarized in KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline from 2012. They suggest to give firstly non-specific supportive treatment (especially renin-angiotensin system blocking agents). Recommendation about steroid/immunosuppression treatment is based on low level of evidence. Recently three studies were organised concerning benefits and risk of steroid/immunosuppressive treatment added together with specific supportive treatment. In the STOP-IgAN study, systemic steroid/immunosuppressive treatment significantly decreased proteinuria but did not stop progression. In the TESTING study, systemic steroid treatment significantly decreased proteinuria and progression. However, the study was recently discontinued due to several severe side effects of steroid treatment. Involvement of intestinal mucosal immunity in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy suggested the NEFIGAN study with budesonide treatment. Budesonide releases corticosteroid in distal small intestine and colon. Proteinuria was significantly decreased and renal function remained stabile. High number of withdrawals owing to adverse effects is a major concern implying a substantial systemic effect of budesonide. We need further information on the characteristics of patients who most likely benefit from steroid/immunosuppressive treatment given after or together with specific supportive treatment. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(49): 1946-1952.

The safety and efficacy of short-term budesonide delivered via mucosal atomization device for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide is a potent corticosteroid commonly prescribed for management of inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The standard for prescribing budesonide is via impregnated nasal saline irrigation (INSI), although recently the mucosal atomization device (MAD) has emerged as a theoretically superior method of distributing medication into the sinuses. The MAD atomizes medication into small droplets and this is thought to enhance absorption and improve bioavailability. However, no studies have shown whether enhanced absorption and improved bioavailability of budesonide via MAD causes adrenal suppression. The objective of this study is to determine whether budesonide via MAD affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. METHODS: Twenty CRS patients were recruited from a tertiary rhinology clinic and randomized to take budesonide (1 mg) via MAD or via INSI twice a day for 60 days. The adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test and 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire were administered on days 1, 30, and 60 of the study. Plasma budesonide and cortisol levels were simultaneously quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. RESULTS: There was no indication of adrenal suppression in either group (n = 20) based on ACTH stimulation test results nor was there significant plasma budesonide levels detected in either group. Quality of life, as indicated by SNOT-22, did not differ between groups at 60 days (p = 0.404; 95% confidence interval [CI], -37.2 to 15.9), but SNOT-22 scores for patients using MAD did show statistically significant improvement at 60 days compared to baseline (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The MAD is likely a safe and effective method of delivering budesonide to the sinuses in the short term.

Towards the Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system: methods and results of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy research.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Guidelines for clinical practice are expected to gather evidence-based recommendations to support optimal medical behaviours. The aim of the current review is to explore how currently available research regarding the strategy of using budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) as maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART) covers the items considered by the Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, through a comparative analysis of methodological approaches, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and costs, in order to highlight uncovered areas. RECENT FINDINGS: Thirteen trials providing data on 21 095 analysed patients were available. No serious limits in methodological study features were found. Evaluation of the clinical outcome was consistent with the efficacy of BUD/FORM maintenance and reliever therapy. As the time to first exacerbation was the primary outcome in most of the studies, conclusive indications cannot be drawn regarding other clinical outcomes or patient-reported outcomes, which were investigated as secondary outcomes. A comprehensive systematic review exploring all critical and important outcomes is desirable, but further research concerning the safety issues of Long Acting ß2 Agonists (LABA) and patients' reported outcomes about the SMART in respect to alternative strategies is likely to affect a clear recommendation in the near future. SUMMARY: The efficacy of BUD/FORM maintenance and reliever therapy in extending the time to first exacerbation appears consistent between studies. Further studies exploring all patients' important outcomes are needed. Clinical and economic assessments are worthy of being investigated to verify the directness of the evidence in respect to real life patients and different geographical realities.

Solubilized nasal steroid (CDX-947) when combined in the same solution nasal spray with an antihistamine (CDX-313) provides improved, fast-acting symptom relief in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Studies indicate that allergy sufferers remain dissatisfied with available antiallergic therapies. A new convenient formulation of solubilized steroid combined in the same nasal spray solution with antihistamine may provide added symptom relief. The objective was to evaluate effects of CDX-947 (solubilized budesonide) and CDX-313 (solubilized azelastine + budesonide) against their suspension-type comparators (budesonide [Rhinocort Aqua {RA}] or azelastine + budesonide [Astelin] {AS} + RA]) and placebo on nasal allergy symptoms of patients exposed to controlled levels of ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC). Two separate EEC studies that enrolled 173 patients were analyzed. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and onset of action were captured. Mean change from baseline of TNSS was compared with analysis of covariance and the onset of action determined. Meta-analysis was performed to allow cross-comparisons between studies. All active treatments significantly reduced TNSS when compared with placebo and both CDX-947 and CDX-313 showed increased improvement over the suspension-type comparators. CDX-313 provided significantly faster onset of action for itchy nose and sneezing. No clinically significant adverse events were reported in this study. The novel combination product, CDX-313, provided fast, long-lasting relief for allergic rhinitis symptoms. Compared with products where corticosteroid remains suspended, the new solubilized nasal spray formulation provides added benefit including faster onset of action and superior, convenient dosing of two therapeutics in one convenient product.

Oral budesonide for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids remain one of the most popular medication choices for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. While corticosteroids may improve symptoms, they do not always result in mucosal healing and have significant adverse effects. Steroids which act topically, with less systemic side-effects may be more desirable. Oral budesonide, a topically acting corticosteroid with extensive first pass hepatic metabolism, is effective in Crohn's disease and in enema formulation for left-sided ulcerative colitis. Data are limited regarding the role of oral budesonide in ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the safety and efficacy of oral budesonide for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searching of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. Two authors independently reviewed all identified titles and abstracts. Full text articles of all potentially relevant studies were retrieved. Reference lists of review articles were searched in an attempt to identify additional studies. Abstracts of the major gastroenterology scientific meetings, held over the past 3 years, were hand searched. The ClinicalTrials.gov website as well as the Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials was searched to identify any ongoing trials. Direct communication with pharmaceutical manufacturers was established to identify any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of oral budesonide for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis, with either a parallel arm or cross-over design, were considered eligible for inclusion. There were no exclusions based on patient age or the type, dose or duration of budesonide therapy. The primary outcome was the induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis. Secondary outcomes included clinical, histologic and endoscopic improvement, endoscopic mucosal healing, change in disease activity index scores, adverse events and study withdrawals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reviewed for eligibility, data were extracted and quality assessed by 2 independent investigators. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the included studies due to significant heterogeneity, with each study comparing budesonide to a different control medication. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Oral budesonide was significantly less likely to induce clinical remission than oral mesalamine after 8 weeks of therapy (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91). There was no significant benefit of oral budesonide in comparison to placebo for inducing clinical remission after 4 weeks of treatment (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.39). A small pilot study reported no statistically significant difference in endoscopic remission between budesonide and prednisolone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.42). The study was small and not powered to evaluate the impact of budesonide on clinical remission. Suppression of plasma cortisol was significantly more common in prednisolone treated patients (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.33). Two multicenter studies are ongoing. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is no evidence to recommend the clinical use of oral budesonide for the induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis. Mesalamine is superior to budesonide for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis.

Clinical trial: controlled, open, randomized multicentre study comparing the effects of treatment on quality of life, safety and efficacy of budesonide or mesalazine enemas in active left-sided ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Therapy for active left-sided ulcerative colitis usually involves topical application of mesalazine (mesalamine) or budesonide. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide enema and mesalazine enema in the treatment of active left-sided ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A total of 237 patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized open 1:1 to receive either budesonide (n = 118) or mesalazine enemas (n = 119) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables were clinical activity index, endoscopic, histological index and IBDQ scores after 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Clinical remission (intention-to-treat analysis) at week 4 was 63.5% for budesonide enemas and 77.2% for mesalazine enemas (P < 0.05). The respective values for the per protocol population (PP) were 59.9% examined in the budesonide group and 77.5% in the mesalazine group (P < 0.02). At the final visit (W8), clinical remission was diagnosed in the ITT analysis for 64.4% of the budesonide group and 77.4% of the mesalazine group (P < 0.05). The respective values for the PP analysis were 59.5% in the budesonide group and 75.3% in the mesalazine group (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with budesonide, mesalazine enema was associated with a significantly higher remission rate; this was supported by favourable trends in endoscopic, histological remission rates and the IBDQ score.

Do patients consider postoperative maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease worthwhile?

BACKGROUND: Treatment decision making for postoperative Crohn's disease is complex because of the increasing number of maintenance therapies available with competing risk-benefit profiles. The main objective of this study was to determine the distribution of patients' preferences for selected postoperative maintenance therapies. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional survey in which patients with Crohn's disease completed a standardized interview. Each participant completed 5 tasks that compared: (1) no medication and 5-ASA, (2) fish oil and 5-ASA, (3) metronidazole and 5-ASA, (4) budesonide and 5-ASA, and (5) azathioprine and 5-ASA. For each task, the minimum change in treatment effect size between the 2 treatments that the participant considered worthwhile was determined. RESULTS: The distribution of the participants' preference scores varied widely for each task. When fish oil, metronidazole, budesonide, and azathioprine were considered equally effective to 5-ASA, 92.9%, 28.8%, 38.4%, and 19% of the participants, respectively, preferred these medications relative to 5-ASA. These percentages increased to 98.4%, 54.8%, 61.9%, and 50.8%, respectively, when fish oil, metronidazole, budesonide, and azathioprine were considered to offer a 5% absolute risk reduction relative to 5-ASA. Regression analysis did not identify any clinical or demographic variables predictive of the participants' treatment preferences. CONCLUSIONS: The participants' preferences for postoperative maintenance therapies were widely distributed, and no clinical or demographic factors predicted these preferences. This emphasizes the need for effective communication between physician and patient in order to select the treatment options most consistent with a patient's informed preferences.

Budesonide foam versus budesonide enema in active ulcerative proctitis and proctosigmoiditis.

BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide is an effective treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety, and patient's preference of budesonide foam vs. budesonide enema. METHODS: Patients with active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis (clinical activity index > 4 and endoscopic index > or = 4) were eligible for this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentre study. They received 2 mg/25 mL budesonide foam and placebo enema (n = 265), or 2 mg/100 mL budesonide enema and placebo foam (n = 268) for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index < or = 4) at the final/withdrawal visit (per protocol). RESULTS: A total of 541 patients were randomized--533 were evaluable for intention-to-treat analysis and 449 for per protocol analysis. Clinical remission rates (per protocol) were 60% for budesonide foam and 66% for budesonide enema (P = 0.02362 for non-inferiority of foam vs. enema within a predefined non-inferiority margin of 15%). Both formulations were safe and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Because of better tolerability and easier application most patients preferred foam (84%). CONCLUSION: Budesonide foam is as effective as budesonide enema in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis. Both budesonide formulations are safe, and most patients prefer foam.

The effects of long term use of inhaled corticosteroids on linear growth, adrenal function and bone mineral density in children.

In this study we aimed to investigate the long term effects of inhaled steroids on linear growth, adrenal function and bone mineral density. Thirty children with moderate asthma were randomly divided into two groups. Fifteen children (8 boys, 7 girls mean age; 10.6 +/- 2.1) were treated with budesonide (group 1), and 15 (9 boys, 6 girls, mean age; 9.6 +/- 2.4). with fluticasone propionate (group 2). Control group included 30 children. Anthropometric assessment, symptom and medication scores, pulmonary functions, bone mineral density, serum and urine cortisol levels and ACTH stimulation test were evaluated at the beginning of the study and after one year period. Symptom and medication scores, pulmonary functions improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.05). The mean annual growth was similar in group 1 and 2 and control group. Bone mineral density was comparable with control group at the beginning of the study and after one year. Mean serum cortisol level diminished at the end of the therapy but no significant differences were found between the initial and end values in respect to urine cortisol levels and cortisol/creatinine ratio. Of three groups ACTH stimulation test revealed that there were no significant difference between study and control groups. In conclusion, although we did not observed any side effects of inhaled corticosteroids we suggest that children treated with inhaled corticosteroids for a long time should be followed closely with respect to side effects.

Controlled, open, randomized multicenter trial comparing the effects of treatment on quality of life, safety and efficacy of budesonide foam and betamethasone enemas in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is evidence of a higher quality of life with foams as compared with enemas. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of treatment with budesonide foam or betamethasone enema on the quality of life and the clinical outcome in patients with distal ulcerative colitis. METHODOLOGY: In an open multicenter trial, patients with active distal ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive 2 mg/50 mL budesonide foam or 5 mg/100 mL betamethasone enema. Primary outcome variable was the change in the mean Life Quality Index. Therapeutic efficacy was determined by clinical activity, endoscopical and histological indices. RESULTS: 38 patients were included in the study. The decrease of the mean Life Quality Index was more pronounced in the budesonide group. No significant difference in the efficacy of treatment was observed for both groups. Betamethasone suppressed the plasma cortisol level in the majority of the patients (87%) compared to only 22% of the patients receiving budesonide. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life is not significantly different in patients during treatment with budesonide foam or betamethasone enema for active distal ulcerative colitis. However, while having comparable clinical efficacy budesonide foam has less effect on the plasma cortisol level thus potentially minimizing steroid side effects.

Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentration as an indicator of adrenocortical suppression during inhaled steroid therapy in adult asthmatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Supraphysiological doses of exogenous glucocorticosteroids cause adrenocortical suppression. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) is the most abundant adrenal androgen and estrogen precursor. We studied to what extent inhaled glucocorticosteroid therapy for asthma decreases serum DHEA-S concentrations. DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured serum DHEA-S and cortisol concentrations in 101 adult patients with newly detected mild asthma before and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids. The patients were randomized to receive budesonide 200 microg/day (low dose group, n=50) or 800 microg/day (high dose group, n=51) in two parallel groups double-blindly. RESULTS: In the low dose group, serum DHEA-S concentrations decreased from the baseline by a mean of 8 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 3-13 %, P<0.01) after 2 weeks of therapy, and by 2 % (95 % CI, 9 % decrease to 5 % increase, NS) after 12 weeks. In the high dose group, the respective decreases were 16 % (95 % CI, 10-21 %, P<0.001) and 18 % (95 % CI, 12-24 %, P<0.001). The difference between the treatment groups was significant at both 2 and 12 weeks. During the 12 week treatment period the baseline concentrations of serum cortisol did not decrease in the low dose group, while in the high dose group the decrease was significant at 12 weeks (P<0.01), but not at 2 weeks. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved equally well in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled budesonide decreased serum DHEA-S concentrations, which may indicate adrenocortical suppression. Reduced adrenal production of androgen and estrogen precursors may increase the risk of osteoporosis especially in postmenopausal women.

Tolerability of a high dose of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in patients with asthma.

This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover, placebo-controlled study assessed the acute tolerability of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca) administered as a high dose. Fourteen patients with asthma receiving budesonide/formoterol maintenance treatment (two inhalations of 160/4.5 microg twice daily) inhaled 10 additional doses of budesonide/formoterol 1600/45 microg (total daily dose including morning dose of maintenance treatment 1920/54 microg) or formoterol 45 microg (Oxis Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca; total daily dose including morning dose of maintenance treatment 54 microg formoterol) or placebo in addition to the morning dose of maintenance treatment on 3 separate study days. Serum potassium, pulse rate, blood pressure and ECG were assessed at regular intervals over a 12-h period following dosing. Blood glucose and plasma lactate were assessed over 3 h following dosing. Changes in serum potassium, pulse rate, blood pressure, QTc, blood glucose and plasma lactate occurring with budesonide/formoterol, though statistically significantly different from placebo (P<0.05), were considered clinically unimportant. No clinically relevant differences were identified between active treatments. In conclusion, budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler is well tolerated at high doses such as might be used by patients using budesonide/formoterol for relief of symptoms of asthma.

Combined budesonide and antibiotic therapy for active Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although antibiotics are frequently used to treat Crohn's disease, this practice is not supported by strong evidence from randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind multicenter study of patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, right colon, or both. Patients were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, both 500 mg twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks. All patients received oral budesonide 9 mg once daily. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients in remission at week 8. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients who were randomized, 130 were evaluated for efficacy; 66 received placebo, and 64 received antibiotics. At week 8, 21 patients (33%) assigned to antibiotics were in remission as compared with 25 patients (38%) in the placebo group (P = 0.55; absolute difference, -5%; 95% confidence interval, -21% to 11%). An interaction (P = 0.025) between treatment allocation and disease location on treatment response was identified. Among patients with disease of the colon, 9 of 17 (53%) were in remission after treatment with antibiotics, compared with 4 of 16 (25%) of those who received placebo (P = 0.10). Discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events occurred in 13 of 66 (20%) patients treated with antibiotics, compared with 0 of 68 in the group who received placebo (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, the addition of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to budesonide is an ineffective intervention, but this antibiotic combination may improve outcome when there is involvement of the colon.