Busulfan with 400 centigray of total body irradiation and higher dose fludarabine: An alternative regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative for children with difficult-to-treat leukemia. The conditioning regimen utilized is known to influence outcomes. We report outcomes of the conditioning regimen used at the Alberta Children's Hospital, consisting of busulfan (with pharmacokinetic target of 3750 µmol*min/L/day ±10%) for 4 days, higher dose (250 mg/m2 ) fludarabine and 400 centigray (cGy) of total body irradiation. PROCEDURE: This retrospective study involved children receiving transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It compared children who fell within the target range for busulfan with those who were either not measured or were measured and fell outside this range. All other treatment factors were identical. RESULTS: Twenty-nine children (17 within target) were evaluated. All subjects engrafted neutrophils with a median [interquartile range] time of 14 days [8-30 days]. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was 44.8% [95% confidence interval, CI: 35.6%-54.0%], while chronic graft-versus-host disease was noted in 16.0% [95% CI: 8.7%-23.3%]. At 2 years, the overall survival was 78.1% [95% CI: 70.8%-86.4%] and event-free survival was 74.7% [95% CI: 66.4%-83.0%]. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.3% [95% CI: 5.1%-17.5%]. There were no statistically significant differences in between the group that received targeted busulfan compared with the untargeted group. CONCLUSION: Our conditioning regiment for children with ALL resulted in outcomes comparable to standard treatment with acceptable toxicities and significant reduction in radiation dose. Targeting busulfan dose in this cohort did not result in improved outcomes.

Busulfan, fludarabine, and melphalan are effective conditioning for pediatric and young adult patients with myeloid malignancies underdoing matched sibling or alternative donor transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a curative option for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. PROCEDURE: We present our 10-year experience (October 2012 to October 2021) of consecutive allo-HCT in patients with myeloid malignancies treated on the pediatric HCT service and conditioned with myeloablative targeted dose-busulfan (BU), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL). Twenty-three children, adolescents, and young adult patients (CAYA) (median age 15.4 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 17), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 4), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 2) underwent allo-HCT post-BU-FLU-MEL. Four patients had treatment-related AML/MDS. Donor/stem cell source was matched sibling donor (MSD) PBSC (n = 7), matched unrelated donor (MUD) PBSC (n = 2), umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 3), or haploidentical-BMT (n = 11). Risk stratification was low (n = 2), intermediate (n = 15), high (n = 3), and very high risk (n = 1). The two patients with CML had failed tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, the relapse rate is only 4.5% with an overall survival (OS) 100%, progression-free survival (PFS) 95.5%, and graft-versus-host-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) 67.8%. The donor source and the acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen significantly impacted grade II-IV aGvHD 66.7% versus 19.2% (p = .039) and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGvHD) 66.7% versus 0% (p = .002) in the patients receiving MSD or MUD PBSC compared to haplo-BMT, respectively, resulting in improved GRFS in haplo-BMT, 83.3% compared to 40% matched donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that BU-FLU-MEL is efficacious conditioning for disease control in young patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing MSD or alternative donor allo-HCT, but in the setting of PBSC grafts with cyclosporine A-methotrexate (CSA-MTX) GvHD prophylaxis, it results in an unacceptably high incidence of GvHD.

Iron Chelation With Deferasirox Increases Busulfan AUC During Conditioning Chemotherapy Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The negative effects of iron overload caused by repetitive blood transfusions and iron release during cytotoxic chemotherapy might be ameliorated by early treatment with an iron chelator. However, in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), chelation therapy is often postponed until the late post-transplantation period because of potential drug interactions. Therefore we systematically investigated the influence of iron chelation with deferasirox on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in adult patients in the context of routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) before HSCT. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study in 25 adult patients with planned allogeneic HSCT after myeloablative, busulfan-based, TDM-guided conditioning chemotherapy. Busulfan was administered intravenously over 3 hours with an initial dose of 3.2 mg/kg once daily (based on adjusted ideal body weight [AIBW] in overweight patients). Four consecutive dosages were planned to achieve a cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of 80 mg · h/L. Patients received deferasirox for transfusional iron overload as per approval from the start of conditioning until day 3 after transplantation. Model-based calculation of the busulfan AUC was carried out by means of Bayesian prediction based on a population pharmacokinetic model after the first or second dose of busulfan, and dose adjustments were performed accordingly. Calculated median cumulative AUC before dose adjustment was 93.7 mg · h/L (65.1-151.4 mg · h/L), which was considerably above the target AUC of 80 mg · h/L ± 10%. Median dose adjustment was -17.1% (-50.0% to 18.2%), and patients ultimately received busulfan with a median cumulative dose of 10.60 mg/kg (6.38 - 15.62) mg/kg. A busulfan dose reduction was necessary in 19 patients (76%) whereas a dose increase was only needed in 1 patient. After dose adjustment the median AUC was 79.7 mg/L · h (62.5 - 84.2 mg/L · h). Median busulfan clearance was 0.134 L/h/kg (0.084 - 0.203 L/h/kg), which is significantly lower than the average clearance of 0.2 L/h/kg reported in the literature, whereas volume of distribution was not altered. We were able to demonstrate, that TDM is the key point to facilitate a safe co-administration of both medications, because the intake of deferasirox leads to a considerable increase in the busulfan AUC of about 35% to 40%. The reason for the increase in busulfan AUC is a reduction in busulfan clearance by about one third; therefore a lower initial dose of busulfan followed by TDM could be considered in patients with comedication with deferasirox.

Optimizing conditioning regimen with low-dose irradiation or busulfan enables the outcome of transplantation from a 6-7/8 HLA-matched donor comparable to that from an 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor in severe aplastic anemia patients under 40 years.

With the dramatic improvements in outcomes following alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), interest in the use of alternative donors in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is increasing. We conducted a multicenter prospective study to explore the efficiency and safety of upfront HSCT from a 6-8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) or 6-7/8 HLA-matched related donor (MRD) in acquired SAA patients under 40 years. Between August 2014 and July 2017, 115 patients were enrolled, including 48 (41.7%) patients receiving grafts from an 8/8 MUD, 25 (21.7%) from a 6-7/8 MRD, and 42 (36.5%) from a 6-7/8 MUD. The incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the 6-7/8 MUD group than in the 8/8 MUD group (42.9% vs. 12.8%, P=0.001). The corresponding incidence in the 6-7/8 MRD group was comparable to that in the 8/8 MUD group (21.7% vs. 12.8%, P=0.332). There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD (24.3%, 13.6%, and 17.9%, P=0.676), graft failure (2.4%, 8.0%, and 6.3%, P=0.551), overall survival (85.7%, 96.0%, and 87.5%, P=0.424), and failure-free survival (83.3%, 88.0%, and 83.3%, P=0.885) among the three groups (6-7/8 MUD, 6-7/8 MRD, and 8/8 MUD). In multivariate analysis, conditioning regimen without low-dose irradiation or busulfan was associated with an inferior failure-free survival (HR=2.973, P=0.042). In conclusion, after an intensified conditioning regimen with additional low-dose irradiation or busulfan, the outcome of HSCT from a 6-7/8 MRD or 6-7/8 MUD is comparable to that from an 8/8 MUD.

131 I-Meta-iodobenzylguanidine followed by busulfan and melphalan and autologous stem cell rescue in high-risk neuroblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the progress in current treatments, the event-free survival of high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) patients does not exceed 40%-50%, and the prognosis of refractory or relapsed patients is poor, still representing a challenge for pediatric oncologist. Therapeutic Iodine-131 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (Th-131 I-MIBG) is a recognized safe and potentially effective treatment for NB. MATERIALS: This retrospective study reports the outcomes of 28 MIBG-avid NB patients with advanced disease either refractory or relapsed, which was undertaken from 1996 to 2014. Th-131 I-MIBG was administered shortly before (median: 17 days) high-dose chemotherapy with busulfan and melphalan (HD-BuMel) and autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) at the Gaslini Institute in Genoa, with the aim of analyzing the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this approach. RESULTS: Engraftment occurred in all patients after a median of 14 (11-29) and 30 days (13-80) from ASCR for neutrophils and platelets, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were observed. The main high-grade (3-4) toxicity observed was oral and gastrointestinal mucositis in 78.6% and 7.1% of patients, respectively, whereas high-grade hepatic toxicity was observed in 10.7%. Two patients developed veno-occlusive-disease (7.1%), completely responsive to defibrotide. Hypothyroidism was the main late complication that occurred in nine patients (31.1%). After Th-131 MIBG and HD-BuMel, 19 patients (67.8%) showed an improvement in disease status. Over a median follow-up of 15.9 years, the three-year and five-year overall survival (OS) probabilities were 53% (CI 0.33-0.69) and 41% (CI 0.22-0.59), and the three-year and five-year rates of cumulative risk of progression/relapse were 64% (CI 0.47-0.81) and 73% (CI 0.55-0.88), respectively. MYCN amplification emerged as the only risk factor significantly associated with OS (HR, 3.58;P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Th-131 I-MIBG administered shortly before HD-BuMel is a safe and effective regimen for patients with advanced MIBG-avid NB. These patients should be managed in centers with proven expertise.

Comparable outcomes among unmanipulated haploidentical, matched unrelated, and matched sibling donors in BU-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for intermediate and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission: a single-center study.

There are a limited number of studies comparing outcomes of busulfan (BU)-based myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using unmanipulated haploidentical donors (HIDs), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and HLA-matched sibling related donors (MSDs) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission (CR) status. With this background, we compared outcomes among 377 cases of CR following consecutive HID-HSCT for AML (CR) to 86 MUD and 92 MSD-HSCT cases. All patients received BU-based myeloablative conditioning and an unmanipulated graft within the same period. The median patient age was 23 years (range 1.1 to 65 years), and 230 patients (41.4%) were under age18. Among the 555 patients, 432 (77.8%) were of intermediate cytogenetic risk and 123 (22.2%) were of adverse risk. A total of 113 patients (20.5%) had FLT3-ITD+ AML, 425 patients (76.6%) were in first complete remission (CR1) post-transplant, and 130 (23.4%) patients were in second CR (CR2). GVHD prophylaxis included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine-A (CSA) with short-term methotrexate (MTX) for HID, and MUD-HSCT. MMF is not used for MSD-HSCT. The median survival follow-up time was 42 months (range 18-91 months). The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts was 73.8% ± 4.8%, 66.4% ± 8.5%, 74.5% ± 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.637). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 74.9% ± 2.4%, 81.8% ± 4.3%, and 77.5% ± 4.5% among the HID, MUD, and MSD cohorts, respectively (P = 0.322). There were no difference among the relapse rate among the HID, MUD, and MSD donor cohorts (14.3% ± 4.0% vs 20.3% ± 6.4% vs 14.5% ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.851) or the non-relapse mortality (NRM) (12.3% ± 3.5% vs 9.5% ± 3.2% vs 14.0% ± 1.8%, respectively; P = 0.441). Multivariate analyses showed that MRD-positive pre-HSCT was the only risk factor associated with a lower OS and LFS and higher risk of relapse among all 555 patients. Compared with the use of a MUD or MSD, an HID for HSCT had similar outcomes among AML patients with CR states who underwent an allo-HSCT with BU-based myeloablative conditioning. MFC-MRD-positive pre-HSCT was an independent negative factor impact on outcomes for AML patients in CR. We conclude that for AML patients who do not have a MSD or if an urgent transplant is required, HSCT from an HID is a valid option.

Comparison of Myeloablative (CyTBI, BuCy) versus Reduced-Intensity (FluBu2TBI400) Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Pretransplant Low WT1 Expression.

Relapse is a major concern with reduced-intensity conditioning. We analyzed 257 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and fulfilled the following criteria: intermediate- or poor-risk disease by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (2017, version 3), in first complete remission (CR1) at SCT, received either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; busulfan plus cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; FluBu2TBI400) peripheral blood SCT from 8/8 matched sibling or unrelated donor, and having bone marrow Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression results before transplant. We and other groups serially published a predictive value for pretransplant WT1 expression in patients with AML to identify patients at higher risk of relapse. Among the total 257 patients, 191 (74.3%) and 66 (25.7%) patients received MAC and RIC transplants, respectively. WT1 ≥250 copies/104ABL was defined as WT1high. WT1high before SCT was found to be an independent prognostic factor for inferior overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). There were 201 patients with WT1 low expression based upon pretransplant analysis. There was no significant difference in OS, DFS, CIR, and nonrelapse mortality between MAC and RIC patients. To conclude, post-transplant survival or relapse was not different by conditioning intensity in AML CR1 patients whose WT1 level was below 250 copies per 104ABL at transplantation.

Addition of melphalan to fludarabine/busulfan (FLU/BU4/MEL) provides survival benefit for patients with myeloid malignancy following allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation/peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation.

A conditioning regimen with fludarabine and myeloablative dose of busulfan (FLU/BU4) has been commonly used in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, there are two major problems with this regimen: insufficient anti-leukemic effect, especially in advanced cases, and slow time to complete donor-type chimerism, especially T-cell chimerism. To overcome these issues, we designed a combination regimen with FLU (150 mg/m2), intravenous BU (12.8 mg/kg), and melphalan (100 mg/m2) (FLU/BU4/MEL) and conducted retrospective analyses of treatment outcomes at our institute. Forty-two patients with myeloid malignancies received allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation or peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (allo-BMT/PBSCT) with FLU/BU4/MEL regimen. The median age of patients was 46.5 years (20-63 years). Thirteen patients (31%) did not achieve complete hematological remission at transplantation. All patients examined achieved complete whole and T-cell chimerism within 1 month after allo-HCT. The 4-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 66.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 49.4-78.3%] and 59.5% (95% CI 43.2-72.6%) in all patients, and 49.4% (95% CI 19.7-73.6%) and 38.5% (95% CI 14.1-62.8%) in patients who were not in remission. In conclusion, FLU/BU4/MEL showed curative potential, even in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies, accompanied by achievement of rapid complete chimerism after allo-BMT/PBSCT.

Influences of FLU/BU and FLU/MEL on incidence and severity of oral mucositis among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.

In the present study, we compared the incidence and severity of oral mucositis among patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after fludarabine-based regimens with busulfan 12.8 mg/kg (FB12.8), with busulfan less than or equal to 9.6 mg/kg (FB9.6), and with melphalan 140 mg/m2 (FM). The incidence of oral mucositis after FB12.8 was the highest among these 3 groups. After FM, all of the patients had developed oral mucositis by day 7. The mean disease duration of oral mucositis after FB12.8 was 13.5 days, whereas the mean disease duration after FM was 24.9 days, and was significantly prolonged as compared to that after FB12.8 (p=0.0009). The incidence of severe oral mucositis (grade 3) after FM was significantly higher than that after FB12.8 (p=0.03). As stated above, although the incidence of oral mucositis after FB12.8 was higher than that after FM, oral mucositis after FB12.8 showed improvement relatively quickly without deterioration. In contrast, the higher incidence of severe oral mucositis and the delay in resolution of mucositis after FM were remarkable.

Mortality outcomes after busulfan-containing conditioning treatment and haemopoietic cell transplantation in patients with Gilbert's syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Gilbert's syndrome is a common inherited disorder of bilirubin metabolism, characterised by mild, unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia. However, the effect of Gilbert's syndrome on the disposition of some drugs can lead to unexpected toxicity. We tested the hypothesis that patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning and haemopoietic cell transplantation would have different mortality outcomes depending on whether or not they had laboratory evidence of Gilbert's syndrome. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used clinical and laboratory data of patients who had haemopoietic cell transplantation from Jan 1, 1991, to Dec 31, 2011. Patients were included if they had received high-dose conditioning regimens of cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation (CY/TBI), busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BU/CY), busulfan plus melphalan plus thioTEPA (BUMELTT), or melphalan before transplant. Patients were excluded if their original consent forms to report transplant outcomes were not signed, if consent was withdrawn, or if they were a prisoner. Patients with Gilbert's syndrome were defined as having laboratory values before the start of conditioning therapy for unconjugated serum bilirubin concentrations of at least 17·1 µmol/L (≥1 mg/dL), normal conjugated serum bilirubin, and no evidence of hepatitis, cholestasis, or haemolysis. We assessed the association of Gilbert's syndrome with overall mortality and non-relapse mortality using adjusted Cox regression models at day 200 after transplantation. FINDINGS: Our study cohort was 3379 patients-1855 (55%) allograft and 1524 (45%) autograft recipients. 211 (6%) patients had Gilbert's syndrome and 3168 (94%) did not have this condition. Most patients were adults (median age 45·8 years [IQR 33·2-55·5]) with haematological malignancies. For overall mortality 664 (20%) patients had died by day 200 after transplant (47 [22%] of 211 who had Gilbert's syndrome vs 617 [19%] of 3168 who did not have Gilbert's syndrome), and for non-relapse mortality 499 (92%) patients had died before relapse was recorded (38 [18%] who had Gilbert's syndrome vs 461 [15%] who did not have Gilbert's syndrome). The effect of Gilbert's syndrome on the risk of overall mortality and non-relapse mortality by transplant day 200 varied between the conditioning regimens and donor groups. In patients conditioned with a myeloablative regimen that contained busulfan (n=1131), those with Gilbert's syndrome (n=60) were at a significantly increased risk of death and non-relapse mortality by day 200 compared with those without Gilbert's syndrome (n=1071; hazard ratio [HR] 2·30, 95% CI 1·47-3·61, p=0·00030; and 2·77, 1·71-4·49, p<0·0001). In patients who received CY/TBI or melphalan conditioning regimens, those with Gilbert's syndrome had similar outcomes to those without Gilbert's syndrome (overall mortality at day 200 HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·60-1·34, p=0·60; non-relapse mortality at day 200: 0·90, 0·56-1·45, p=0·65). Analyses of causes of death and busulfan disposition provided no mechanistic explanation for the differences in mortality. INTERPRETATION: Overall mortality and non-relapse mortality at day 200 after transplant were significantly worse in patients with Gilbert's syndrome who received busulfan-containing myeloablative conditioning regimens, compared with non-Gilbert's syndrome patients. Patients with Gilbert's syndrome should receive busulfan-containing myeloablative conditioning regimens with caution. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous busulfan combined with therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosing improves outcomes after allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The best method to estimate busulfan exposure and optimum exposure in children or young adults remains unclear. We therefore assessed three approaches to estimate intravenous busulfan exposure (expressed as cumulative area under the curve [AUC]) and associated busulfan AUC with clinical outcomes in children or young adults undergoing allogeneic HCT. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients from 15 centres in the Netherlands, USA, Canada, Switzerland, UK, Italy, Germany, and Australia who received a busulfan-based conditioning regimen between March 18, 2001, and Feb 12, 2015, were included. Cumulative AUC was calculated by numerical integration using non-linear mixed effect modelling (AUCNONMEM), non-compartmental analysis (AUC from 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞] and to the next dose [AUC0-τ]), and by individual centres using various approaches (AUCcentre). The main outcome of interest was event-free survival. Other outcomes of interest were graft failure or relapse, or both; transplantation-related mortality; acute toxicity (veno-occlusive disease or acute graft versus-host disease [GvHD]); chronic GvHD; overall survival; and chronic-GvHD-free event-free survival. We used propensity-score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, Weibull models, and Fine-Gray competing risk regressions for statistical analyses. FINDINGS: 790 patients were enrolled, 674 of whom were included: 274 (41%) with malignant and 400 (59%) with non-malignant disease. Median age was 4·5 years (IQR 1·4-10·7). The median busulfan AUCNONMEM was 74·4 mg × h/L (95% CI 31·1-104·6), which correlated with the standardised method AUC0-∞ (r2=0·74), but the latter correlated poorly with AUCcentre (r2=0·35). Estimated 2-year event-free survival was 69·7% (95% CI 66·2-73·0). Event-free survival at 2 years was 77·0% (95% CI 72·1-82·9) in the 257 patients with an optimum intravenous busulfan AUC of 78-101 mg × h/L compared with 66·1% (60·9-71·4) in the 235 patients at the low historical target of 58-86 mg × h/L and 49·5% (29·2-66·0) in the 44 patients with a high (>101 mg × h/L) busulfan AUC (p=0·011). Compared with the low AUC group, graft failure or relapse occurred less frequently in the optimum AUC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57, 95% CI 0·39-0·84; p=0·0041). Acute toxicity (HR 1·69, 1·12-2·57; p=0·013) and transplantation-related mortality (2·99, 1·82-4·92; p<0·0001) were significantly higher in the high AUC group (>101 mg × h/L) than in the low AUC group (<78 mg × h/L), independent of indication; no difference was noted between AUC groups for chronic GvHD (<78 mg × h/L vs ≥78 mg × h/L, HR 1·30, 95% CI 0·73-2·33; p=0·37). INTERPRETATION: Improved clinical outcomes are likely to be achieved by targeting the busulfan AUC to 78-101 mg × h/L using a new validated pharmacokinetic model for all indications. FUNDING: Research Allocation Program and the UCSF Helen Friller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Mt Zion Health Fund of the University of California, San Francisco.

Where to Turn for Second-Line Cytoreduction After Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera?

UNLABELLED: The goals of therapy in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are to improve disease-related symptoms, prevent the incidence or recurrence of thrombosis, and possibly delay or prevent the transformation into myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytoreductive therapies have been used in older patients and those with a history of thrombosis to achieve these goals. Hydroxyurea (HU) remains the first-line cytoreductive choice; however, up to one in four patients treated with HU over time will develop resistance or intolerance to HU. More importantly, patients who fail HU have a 5.6-fold increase in mortality and a 6.8-fold increase risk of transformation to myelofibrosis or AML; therefore, alternative therapies are needed for these patients. Interferon-α has been used in PV and has shown significant activity in achieving hematologic responses and decreasing JAK2 V617F mutation allele burden. JAK inhibition has also been investigated and recently garnered regulatory approval for this indication. In this review, we will discuss the current treatment options that are available for patients after HU and the novel therapies that are currently under investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The outcomes of PV patients who fail or who are intolerant of hydroxyurea are poor. Although pegylated interferon can be considered in younger patients, currently, ruxolitinib is the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved agent in this setting, representing a viable option, leading to hematocrit control and a reduction in spleen size and constitutional symptoms. Although a small number of patients will achieve a molecular response with continuous treatment, the implications of such response on the clinical outcomes are still unknown. Patients whose disease is not adequately controlled with ruxolitinib, or who lose their response, can be treated with low-dose busulfan or pipobroman; however, they should be encouraged to participate in trials with novel therapies.

Unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of non-malignant genetic diseases: An alemtuzumab based regimen is associated with cure of clinical disease; earlier clearance of alemtuzumab may be associated with graft rejection.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with matched unrelated donors (MUD), offers potentially curative therapy for patients with non-malignant genetic diseases. In this pilot study conducted from 2006 to 2014, we report the outcomes of 15 patients with non-malignant genetic diseases who received a myeloablative regimen with a reduced cyclophosphamide dose, adjunctive serotherapy and MUD HSCT [intravenous alemtuzumab (52 mg/m(2) ), busulfan (16 mg/kg), fludarabine (140mg/m(2) ), and cyclophosphamide (105 mg/kg)]. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. Median (range) time to neutrophil engraftment (>500 cells/µL) and platelet engraftment (>20,000/mm(3) ) were 15 (12-28) and 25 (17-30) days, respectively. At a median follow-up of 2 (0.2-5.4) years, the overall survival (OS) was 93.3% (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 73.3% (95% CI: 0.44-0.89). Among this small sample, earlier alemtuzumab clearance was significantly associated with graft rejection (P = 0.047), earlier PHA response (P = 0.009) and a trend toward earlier recovery of recent thymic emigrants (RTE) (P = 0.06). This regimen was associated with durable donor engraftment and relatively low rates of regimen related toxicity (RRT); future alemtuzumab pharmacokinetic studies may improve outcomes, by allowing targeted alemtuzumab clearance to reduce graft rejection and promote more rapid immune reconstitution.

A Bortezomib-Based Regimen Offers Promising Survival and Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Myeloablative HLA-Mismatched and Unrelated Donor Transplantation: A Phase II Trial.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients lacking HLA-matched related donors have increased graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Bortezomib added to reduced-intensity conditioning can offer benefit in T cell-replete HLA-mismatched HSCT and may also benefit myeloablative conditioning (MAC) transplants. We conducted a phase II trial of short-course bortezomib plus standard tacrolimus/methotrexate after busulfan/fludarabine MAC in 34 patients with predominantly myeloid malignancies. Fourteen (41%) received 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) and 20 (59%) received 7/8 HLA-mismatched related/unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Median age was 49 years (range, 21 to 60), and median follow-up was 25 months (range, 11 to 36). The regimen was well tolerated. No dose modifications were required. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 14 (range, 10 to 33) and 17 (range, 10 to 54) days, respectively. Median 30-day donor chimerism was 99% (range, 90 to 100), and 100-day grades II to IV and III to IV acute GVHD incidence was 32% and 12% respectively. One-year chronic GVHD incidence was 50%. Two-year cumulative incidence of both NRM and relapse was 16%. Two-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 70% and 71%, respectively. Outcomes were comparable to an 8/8 MUD MAC cohort (n = 45). Immune reconstitution was robust. Bortezomib-based MAC HSCT is well tolerated, with HLA-mismatched outcomes comparable with 8/8 MUD MAC HSCT, and is suitable for randomized evaluation. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01323920.).

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for mucopolysaccharidosis patients is safe and effective: results after implementation of international guidelines.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only treatment able to prevent progressive neurodegenerative disease in a selected group of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) disorders. However, its use was historically limited by the high risk of graft failure and transplantation-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, since 2005 new international HCT guidelines for MPS disorders were proposed. The survival and graft outcomes of MPS patients receiving HCT according to these guidelines in 2 European centers of expertise were evaluated. Two consecutive conditioning regimens were used, busulfan/cyclophosphamide or fludarabine/busulfan-based, both with exposure-targeted i.v. busulfan. A noncarrier matched sibling donor (MSD), matched unrelated cord blood (UCB), or matched unrelated donor (MUD) were considered to be preferred donors. If not available, a mismatched UCB donor was used. Participants were 62 MPS patients (56 MPS type I-Hurler, 2 MPS type II, 2 MPS type III, and 2 MPS type VI) receiving HCT at median age 13.5 months (range, 3 to 44). Forty-one patients received a UCB donor, 17 MSD, and 4 MUD. High overall survival (95.2%) and event-free survival (90.3%) were achieved with only low toxicity: 13.3% acute graft-versus-host disease aGVHD) grades II to IV and 14.8% chronic GVHD (1.9% extensive). A mismatched donor predicted for lower event-free survival (P = .04). A higher age at HCT was a predictor for both aGVHD (P = .001) and chronic GVHD (P = .01). The use of a mismatched donor was a predictor for aGVHD (P = .01). Higher rates of full-donor chimerism were achieved in successfully transplanted UCB recipients compared with MSD/MUD (P = .002). If complying with the international HCT guidelines, HCT in MPS patients results in high safety and efficacy. This allows extension of HCT to more attenuated MPS types. Because a younger age at HCT is associated with reduction of HCT-related toxicity, newborn screening may further increase safety.

Intravenous BU plus Mel: an effective, chemotherapy-only transplant conditioning regimen in patients with ALL.

We investigated the administration of i.v. BU combined with melphalan (Mel) in patients with ALL undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Forty-seven patients with a median age of 33 years (range 20-61) received a matched sibling (n=27) or matched unrelated donor transplant (n=20) for ALL in first CR (n=26), second CR (n=13), or with more advanced disease (n=8). BU was infused daily for 4 days, either at a fixed dose of 130 mg/m² (5 patients) or using pharmacokinetic (PK) dose adjustment (42 patients), to target an average daily area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 5000 µmol/min, determined by a test dose of i.v. BU at 32 mg/m². This was followed by a rest day, then two daily doses of Mel at 70 mg/m². Stem cells were infused on the following day. The 2-year OS, PFS and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were 35% (95% confidence interval (CI), 23-51%), 31% (95% CI, 21-48%) and 37% (95% CI, 23-50%), respectively. Acute NRM at 100 days was favorable at 12% (95% CI, 5-24%); however, the 2-year NRM was significantly higher for patients older than 40 years, 58% vs 20%, mainly due to GVHD.

Busulfan, fludarabine, and alemtuzumab as a reduced toxicity regimen for children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases improves engraftment and graft-versus-host disease without delaying immune reconstitution.

For children receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs), the toxicity of the conditioning regimen and graft failure remain challenges. We previously reported that targeted i.v. busulfan, fludarabine, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) decreased toxicity but had a graft failure rate of 21%. To improve the engraftment rate, we replaced ATG with alemtuzumab, a monoclonal Ab targeting CD52. Thirty-five children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases were enrolled in this phase II prospective study. Twelve children had HLA-matched related donors (MRDs), 16 had 10 of 10, and 7 had 9 of 10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs). Thirty-one of 34 evaluable patients (91%) achieved a durable engraftment. All 3 patients who rejected had a nonmalignant disease and received a MUD transplantation (2 mismatched at 1 antigen). Three patients died of a transplantation-related complication (9% ± 5.2%). Seven patients had disease relapse or progression, 2 of whom died. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 15-85 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was 61% ± 9.0% and the overall survival (OS) was 78% ± 7.5%. The median time to neutrophil recovery, B cell, and T cell reconstitution were 16 days, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. At 1 year, the median donor chimerism in whole blood, CD3, CD14/15, and CD19 subsets were 97%, 87%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Six patients (17% ± 6.6%) developed acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), only 2 of which were >grade II. Two patients (8% ± 5.4%) progressed to chronic GVHD (cGVHD). These results suggest that replacement of rATG with alemtuzumab may improve engraftment as well as decrease cGVHD rates without resulting in delays in immune reconstitution.

CD34+ immunoselection of autologous grafts for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Graft contamination has been blamed for causing relapse in children with high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PROCEDURE: We report the long-term results of hematopoietic reconstitution, post-transplant complications, and clinical outcome of 44 children with HRNB treated with busulfan/melphalan high-dose chemotherapy followed by transplantation of purged CD34+ immunoselected autologous peripheral HSCT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) of grafts was evaluated by anti-GD2 immunofluorescence or tyrosine hydroxylase reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Contaminating neuroblasts were found in 19/38 grafts (50%) before CD34+ positive selection, and none after (technique sensitivity of one cell in 10(5)). A median of 6.5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range 0.8-23.7) were transplanted with only 2% of TRM. Neutrophils and platelet recovery occurred within a median of 12 days (range 9-47) and 44 days (range 12-259), respectively, without any secondary graft failure. Twenty-three percents of patients experienced a sepsis (10/44) and 14% a pyelonephritis (6/44). Recurrence of varicella zoster virus occurred in 21% of patients (9/44). Negative RT-PCR MRD within the leukapheresis product and cis-retinoic acid therapy were significantly and independently associated to a better survival (P < 0.05). Overall and event-free survivals at 5 years post-transplant were at 59.3% and 48.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Besides high rates of manageable infections due to late immune recovery, transplantation with CD34+ immunoselected grafts in HRNB children was feasible and did not affect long-term hematopoiesis.

A randomised comparison of treosulfan and carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer: a study by the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG).

The management of older and unfit women with advanced ovarian cancer requires post-operative chemotherapy but many of these patients are not suitable for high-dose cisplatin-based regimes. Carboplatin has been an easier alternative and can be given in the ambulatory setting. Historical data suggests that oral alkylating agents to be just effective with similar efficacy. In this study we have compared platinum-based carboplatin to the alkylating agent treosulfan in a population unfit to receive high-dose cisplatin. The trial randomised patients to either intravenous carboplatin or treosulfan as single agent. The trial was stopped prematurely after the interim analysis showed improved survival and response rates in the carboplatin arm. We conclude that carboplatin is a safe and effective drug in a population that is unfit for high-dose cisplatin. Treosulfan showed limited activity but may be considered along with other oral drugs in limited circumstances. With the exception of myelosuppression, toxicity was mild in both arms. Carboplatin remains the gold standard in this older and less fit group of patients.