RESUMEN
The maternal mortality rate in Indonesia is still high, at 305 per 100,000 live births. Several studies indicated maternal financial burden as one of the dimensions of access that influence a pregnant woman's ability to receive adequate, high-quality medical care. This study aims to identify the association between the use of Indonesia's national health insurance (JKN) and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures in accessing delivery services, using data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey 5. In addition, this study also investigated the relationship of JKN and the potential reduction of catastrophic delivery expenditures (CDEs) for delivery services. The results show that JKN was associated with reduced OOP expenditures for delivery as well as reduced risk of incurring CDE. However, some OOP expenditure for cost of delivery services still exists among mothers who used JKN during delivery, potentially due to factors such as medicine stock availability and inpatient care shortages.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Indonesia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Embarazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The recession that started in the United States in December 2007 has had a significant impact on the Spanish economy through a large increase in the unemployment rate and a long recession which led to tough austerity measures imposed on public finances. Taking advantage of this quasi-natural experiment, we use data from the Spanish Ministry of Health from 1996 to 2015 to provide novel causal evidence on the short-term impact of changes in healthcare provision and regulations on health outcomes. The fact that regional governments have discretionary powers in deciding healthcare budgets and that austerity measures have not been implemented uniformly across Spain helps isolate the impact of these policy changes on health indicators of the Spanish population. Using Ruhm's (Q J Econ 115(2):617-650, 2000) fixed effects model, we find that medical staff and hospital bed reductions account for a significant increase in mortality rates from circulatory diseases and external causes, but not from other causes of death. Similarly, mortality rates do not seem to be robustly affected by the 2012 changes in retirees' pharmaceutical co-payments and access restrictions for illegal immigrants. Our results are robust to changes in model specification and sample selection and are primarily driven by accidental and emergency deaths rather than in-hospital mortality, which suggests a larger role for decreases in accessibility rather than decreases in healthcare quality as impact channels.
Asunto(s)
Recesión Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Política de Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , España , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center offers two alternative payment models for joint replacement: the voluntary Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) model and the mandatory Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. As CMS considers methods for cost reduction, research is needed to understand patient-level outcomes and organizational-level success factors. A retrospective cross-sectional study of hospitals was performed, using regression models to evaluate an aggregate patient satisfaction score, complication rates, and operational differences among BPCI, CJR, and nonparticipating hospitals. Results show that BPCI hospitals received significantly better patient satisfaction scores (88.6) than CJR hospitals (86.0), but complication rates were not significantly different between CJR and BPCI hospitals (2.83 and 2.77, respectively). Factors associated with BPCI participation include academic affiliation, a Northeast region locale, and having a higher CMS efficiency score. Thus, requiring more hospitals to participate in CMS-bundled payment programs as a federal policy may not be the optimal way to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes. Rather, the CJR and BPCI programs should be further studied, and the results generalized for use by nonparticipating hospitals to encourage preparation and participation in CMS value-based initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate relative clinical effectiveness of treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a statistical model of real-world evidence within UK general practitioner practices (GPP), to quantify the opportunities for diabetes care performance improvement. METHOD: From the National Diabetes Audit in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, GPP target glycaemic control (TGC-%HbA1c ≤58 mmol/mol) and higher glycaemic risk (HGR -%HbA1c results >86 mmol/mol) outcomes were linked using multivariate linear regression to prescribing, demographics and practice service indicators. This was carried out both cross-sectionally (XS) (within year) and longitudinally (Lo) (across years) on 35 indicators. Standardised ß coefficients were used to show relative level of impact of each factor. Improvement opportunity was calculated as impact on TGC & HGR numbers. RESULTS: Values from 6525 GPP with 2.7 million T2DM individuals were included. The cross-sectional model accounted for up to 28% TGC variance and 35% HGR variance, and the longitudinal model accounted for up to 9% TGC and 17% HGR variance. Practice service indicators including % achieving routine checks/blood pressure/cholesterol control targets were positively correlated, while demographic indicators including % younger age/social deprivation/white ethnicity were negatively correlated. The ß values for selected molecules are shown as (increased TGC; decreased HGR), canagliflozin (XS 0.07;0.145/Lo 0.04;0.07), metformin (XS 0.12;0.04/Lo -;-), sitagliptin (XS 0.06;0.02/Lo 0.10;0.06), empagliflozin (XS-;0.07/Lo 0.09;0.07), dapagliflozin (XS -;0.04/Lo -;0.4), sulphonylurea (XS -0.18;-0.12/Lo-;-) and insulin (XS-0.14;0.02/ Lo-0.09;-). Moving all GPP prescribing and interventions to the equivalent of the top performing decile of GPP could result in total patients in TGC increasing from 1.90 million to 2.14 million, and total HGR falling from 191 000 to 123 000. CONCLUSIONS: GPP using more legacy therapies such as sulphonylurea/insulin demonstrate poorer outcomes, while those applying holistic patient management/use of newer molecules demonstrate improved glycaemic outcomes. If all GPP moved service levels/prescribing to those of the top decile, both TGC/HGR could be substantially improved.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Monitoreo de Drogas/economía , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Medicina General/organización & administración , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Auditoría Médica , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Análisis de Regresión , Medicina Estatal/economía , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
In response to widespread concerns regarding Veterans' access to VA care, Congress enacted the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which required VA to establish the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). Since the inception of VCP, more than two million Veterans have received care from community providers, representing approximately 25% of Veterans enrolled in VA care. However, expanded access to non-VA care has created challenges in care coordination between VA and community health systems. In March 2018, the VA Health Services Research & Development Service hosted a VA State of the Art conference (SOTA) focused on care coordination. The SOTA convened VA researchers, program directors, clinicians, and policy makers to identify knowledge gaps regarding care coordination within the VA and between VA and community systems of care. This article provides a summary and synthesis of relevant literature and provides recommendations generated from the SOTA about how to evaluate cross-system care coordination. Care coordination is typically evaluated using health outcomes including hospital readmissions and death; however, in cross-system evaluations of care coordination, measures such as access, cost, Veteran/patient and provider satisfaction (including with cross-system communication), comparable quality metrics, context (urban vs. rural), and patient complexity (medical and mental health conditions) need to be included to fully evaluate care coordination effectiveness. Future research should examine the role of multiple individuals coordinating VA and non-VA care, and how these coordinators work together to optimize coordination.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Salud de los Veteranos/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Many countries with a high tuberculosis (TB) burden are adopting social health insurance (SHI) schemes. However, the national TB programs (NTPs) of these countries are only just starting to grapple with the effects of SHI on their operations. Here, we review the rationale for analyzing TB programs in light of the changes brought by SHI. We consider the influence of certain purchasing decisions on TB care and prevention, and the opportunities that SHI may present for NTPs to broaden private sector engagement, extract TB data across the health sector, and facilitate quality improvement efforts. We also explore which functions are likely to be performed by SHI systems, which require special attention with the advent of SHI, and the metrics that indicate how much of TB care seeking and treatment can be reached and influenced by SHI. SHI presents certain risks for TB programs, but also opportunities to adapt to a more modern health system and to bring quality TB care and treatment to more people.
Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Tuberculosis/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud , Financiación Gubernamental , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Sector Privado , Sector PúblicoRESUMEN
The prevalence of diabetes has increased dramatically over the past three decades, and currently, China has the largest number of diabetics worldwide; this number continues to grow and puts ongoing strains on the medical resources. In this review, we reviewed the diabetes research conducted in China from 1995 to 2015 with the aim of providing new insights regarding the current status and future perspectives for researchers, diabetes health providers, and respective policy-makers. Remarkable progress has been made in diabetes research in China during the past two decades in terms of both the quantity and publication influence. The progress, however, struggles to adequately manage diabetes in China. Here we addressed opportunities to strengthen researches, including new drug development, high quality studies on health economics, and healthcare quality improvement studies. As the expected wave of diabetic complications is upcoming and overwhelming, we therefore recommend that immediate improvements are required to implement the researches regarding their prevention and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Medicina Tradicional China/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , China/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Humanos , Medicina Tradicional China/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Tradicional China/tendencias , Salud Pública/economía , Salud Pública/métodos , Publicaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicaciones/tendencias , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normasRESUMEN
The population that undergoes pediatric surgical procedures in high-resource settings such as Canada primarily comprises healthy patients who undergo low-risk, elective surgeries and fewer higher-risk patients who require more complex surgeries. Given this variability, there is a relatively low incidence of traditionally measured "critical" outcomes within any single pediatric surgical system or even pediatric surgical subspecialty, rendering the currently available quality measurement tools inadequate to provide sensitive measures of quality. In an era when scalable solutions are required to improve health outcomes across entire populations, there is an urgent need for more holistic measures of a child's well-being to benchmark and measure changes in quality of care. This article discusses opportunities for enhanced performance measurement in pediatric surgery using a value-based framework to identify and measure patient and family outcomes of importance over the full care cycle, from initial presentation through surgery and recovery to sustainability of health. In suggesting new avenues for performance measurement, we highlight how these measures can be used to develop, evaluate and refine surgical system innovations such as bundled care pathways and perioperative care homes.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/organización & administración , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/economía , Pediatría , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/economía , Adolescente , Canadá , Niño , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de SaludAsunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Acceso a Internet , Salud Sexual/legislación & jurisprudencia , Confidencialidad , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Sexual/economíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The cost of providing cancer care in low-income countries remains largely unknown, which creates a significant barrier to effective planning and resource allocation. This study examines the cost of providing comprehensive cancer care at the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE) in Rwanda. METHODS: A retrospective costing analysis was conducted from the provider perspective by using secondary data from the administrative systems of the BCCOE. We identified the start-up funds necessary to begin initial implementation and determined the fiscal year 2013-2014 operating cost of the cancer program, including capital expenditures and fixed and variable costs. RESULTS: A total of $556,105 US dollars was assessed as necessary start-up funding to implement the program. The annual operating cost of the cancer program was found to be $957,203 US dollars. Radiotherapy, labor, and chemotherapy were the most significant cost drivers. Radiotherapy services, which require sending patients out of country because there are no radiation units in Rwanda, comprised 25% of program costs, labor accounted for 21%, and chemotherapy, supportive medications, and consumables accounted for 15%. Overhead, training, computed tomography scans, surgeries, blood products, pathology, and social services accounted for less than 10% of the total. CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to examine operating costs for implementing a cancer center in a low-income country. Having a strong commitment to cancer care, adapting clinical protocols to the local setting, shifting tasks, and creating collaborative partnerships make it possible for BCCOE to provide quality cancer care at a fraction of the cost seen in middle- and high-income countries, which has saved many lives and improved survival. Not all therapies, though, were available because of limited financial resources.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , RwandaRESUMEN
Described as "universal prepayment," the national health insurance (or single-payer) model of universal health coverage is increasingly promoted by international actors as a means of raising revenue for health care and improving social risk protection in low- and middle-income countries. Likewise, in the United States, the recent failed efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act have renewed debate about where to go next with health reform and arguably opened the door for a single-payer, Medicare-for-All plan, an alternative once considered politically infeasible. Policy debates about single-payer or national health insurance in the United States and abroad have relied heavily on Canada's system as an ideal-typical single-payer system but have not systematically examined health system performance indicators across different universal coverage models. Using available cross-national data, we categorize countries with universal coverage into those best exemplifying national health insurance (single-payer), national health service, and social health insurance models and compare them to the United States in terms of cost, access, and quality. Through this comparison, we find that many critiques of single-payer are based on misconceptions or are factually incorrect, but also that single-payer is not the only option for achieving universal coverage in the United States and internationally.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Sistema de Pago Simple/organización & administración , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Sistema de Pago Simple/economía , Estados Unidos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guideline-recommended therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) encourages evidence-based treatment; however, there is a knowledge gap regarding the influence of guideline-recommended initiation of therapy on outcomes and cost. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if lack of guideline-recommended initiation of first-line systemic therapy was associated with worse patient outcomes and increased costs for patients with mNSCLC. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 1,344 Medicare patients with mNSCLC were identified from Humana data. Performance status (PS) was imputed using procedure, diagnosis, and durable medical equipment codes pre-index. Guideline-recommended initiation of therapy was defined as ≥1 cycle of National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended first-line therapy based on age and PS or targeted therapies regardless of age and PS. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy. A Cox model assessed factors associated with 6-month mortality. End-of-life quality of care indicators included hospital admission and oncology infusions 30 days preceding death and were evaluated using logistic regression models. A generalized linear model assessed the relationship between guideline-recommended initiation of therapy and total health care costs in the 6 months post-index controlling for clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics. Logistic models for inpatient stays and emergency department visits were also evaluated. RESULTS: Guideline-recommended therapy initiation was observed in 75.5% of patients. Patients not initiating guideline-recommended therapy were older, with a mean (SD) age of 72.5 (6.7) versus 71.2 (6.2) years (P = 0.001), and more frequently identified as having a low-income subsidy (30.0% vs. 16.4%; P < 0.001). Among the 24.6% of patients who died ≤ 6 months post-index, a greater percentage had not initiated guideline-recommended therapy (28.8% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.040). In adjusted models, PS (not initiation of guideline-recommended therapy) was predictive of mortality (patients with poor PS had an 84% higher probability of death [P = 0.014]). Among decedents, 64.2% were hospitalized, and 33.9% had an oncology-related infusion within 30 days of death, with no differences by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy. These end-of-life quality indicators were not associated with guideline-recommended initiation of therapy in adjusted models. Overall, 47.5% of patients who initiated guideline-recommended therapy were hospitalized compared with 55.0% of patients who did not (P = 0.026). Patients initiating guideline-recommended therapy had higher post-index total and oncology-related health care costs and fewer hospitalizations. In models, these differences in costs and hospitalizations were not associated with initiation of guideline-recommended therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients initiated guideline-recommended therapy, with no differences in mortality and quality of care at the end of life by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy, though adherence beyond treatment initiation was not assessed. Unadjusted hospitalization rates were lower and costs were higher for patients who initiated guideline-recommended therapy. These differences were no longer observed after risk adjustment, suggesting that they may have been influenced by patient characteristics, disease progression, and subsequent treatment decisions. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Genentech. Khoury, Michael, Parikh, and Bunce are employed by Genentech. Casebeer, Drzayich Antol, DeClue, Hopson, Li, and Stemkowski are employed by Comprehensive Health Insights, Humana, which was contracted by Genentech to conduct this study. Sehman is employed by Humana. Based on this research, 2 posters were presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2017 on October 16-19, 2017, in Dallas, Texas. Another poster was also presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Annual European Congress on October 29-November 2, 2016, in Vienna, Austria.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
This study's objective is to provide an alternative explanation for the low enrolment in health insurance in Ghana by analysing differences in perceptions between the insured and uninsured of the non-technical quality of healthcare. It further explores the association between insurance status and perception of healthcare quality to ascertain whether insurance status matters in the perception of healthcare quality. Data from a survey of 1,903 households living in the catchment area of 64 health centres were used for the analysis. Two sample independent t-tests were employed to compare the average perceptions of the insured and uninsured on seven indicators of non-technical quality of healthcare. A generalised ordered logit regression, controlling for socio-economic characteristics and clustering at the health facility level, tested the association between insurance status and perceived quality of healthcare. The perceptions of the insured were found to be significantly more negative than the uninsured and those of the previously insured were significantly more negative than the never insured. Being insured was associated with a significantly lower perception of healthcare quality. Thus, once people are insured, they tend to perceive the quality of healthcare they receive as poor compared to those without insurance. This study demonstrated that health insurance status matters in the perceptions of healthcare quality. The findings also imply that perceptions of healthcare quality may be shaped by individual experiences at the health facilities, where the insured and uninsured may be treated differently. Health insurance then becomes less attractive due to the poor perception of the healthcare quality provided to individuals with insurance, resulting in low demand for health insurance in Ghana. Policy makers in Ghana should consider redesigning, reorganizing, and reengineering the National Healthcare Insurance Scheme to ensure the provision of better quality healthcare for both the insured and uninsured.
Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Ghana , Política de Salud/economía , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Percepción , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 , Neoplasias , Percepción , Médicos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/normas , Gastos en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Gastos en Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Oncología Médica/economía , Oncología Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicare/economía , Medicare/normas , Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015/economía , Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Médicos/economía , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite the universal acknowledgment that triage is necessary to prioritize emergency care, there is no review that provides an overview of triage tools evaluated and utilized in resource-poor settings, such as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We seek to quantify and evaluate studies evaluating triage tools in LMICs. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2000 and 2015 to identify studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of triage tools for adult emergency care in LMICs. Studies were then evaluated for the overall quality of evidence using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included in the review, evaluating six triage tools. Three of the 18 studies were in low-income countries and none were in rural hospitals. Two of the six tools had evaluations of reliability. Each tool positively predicted clinical outcomes, although the variety in resource environments limited ability to compare the predictive nature of any one tool. The South African Triage Scale had the highest quality of evidence. In comparison with high-income countries, the review showed fewer studies evaluating reliability and presented a higher number of studies with small sample sizes that decreased the overall quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: The quality of evidence supporting any single triage tool's validity and reliability in LMICs is moderate at best. Research on triage tool applicability in low-resource environments must be targeted to the actual clinical environment where the tool will be utilized, and must include low-income countries and rural, primary care settings.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , TriajeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of provider competition under global budgeting on the use of cesarean delivery in Taiwan. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: (1) Quarterly inpatient claims data of all clinics and hospitals with birth-related expenses from 2000 to 2008; (2) file of health facilities' basic characteristics; and (3) regional quarterly point values (price conversion index) for clinics and hospitals, respectively, from the fourth quarter in 1999 to the third quarter in 2008, from the Statistics of the National Health Insurance Administration. STUDY DESIGN: Panel data of quarterly facility-level cesarean delivery rates with provider characteristics, birth volumes, and regional point values are analyzed with the fractional response model to examine the effect of external price changes on provider behavior in birth delivery services. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The decline in de facto prices of health services as a result of noncooperative competition under global budgeting is associated with an increase in cesarean delivery rates, with a high degree of response heterogeneity across different types of provider facilities. CONCLUSIONS: While global budgeting is an effective cost containment tool, intensified financial pressures may lead to unintended consequences of compromised quality due to a shift in provider practice in pursuit of financial rewards.
Asunto(s)
Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Costos/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Cesárea/economía , Control de Costos/métodos , Competencia Económica/economía , Femenino , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Taiwán , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of hospital affiliation, centralization, and managed care plan ownership on inpatient cost and quality. DATA SOURCES: Inpatient discharges from 3,957 community hospitals in 44 states and American Hospital Association Annual Survey data from 2010 to 2012. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal regression analysis using hierarchical modeling of discharges clustered within hospitals. DATA COLLECTION: Detailed discharge data including costs, length of stay, and patient characteristics from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases were merged with hospital survey data from the American Hospital Association. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Hospitals affiliated with health systems had a higher cost per discharge and better quality of care compared with independent hospitals. Centralized systems in particular had the highest cost per discharge and longest stays. Independent hospitals with managed care plans had a higher cost per discharge and better quality of care compared with other independent hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing prevalence of health systems and hospital managed care ownership may lead to higher quality but are unlikely to reduce hospital discharge costs. Encouraging participation in innovative payment and delivery reform models, such as accountable care organizations, may be more powerful options.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales Comunitarios/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propiedad , Alta del Paciente/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
US policymakers place high priority on tying Medicare payments to the value of care delivered. A critical part of this effort is the Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program (HVBP), which rewards or penalizes hospitals based on their quality and episode-based costs of care and incentivizes integration between hospitals and post-acute care providers. Within HVBP, each patient affects hospital performance on a variety of quality and spending measures, and performance translates directly to changes in program points and ultimately dollars. In short, hospital revenue from a patient consists not only of the DRG payment, but also of that patient's marginal future reimbursement. We estimate the magnitude of the marginal future reimbursement for individual patients across each type of quality and performance measure. We describe how those incentives differ across hospitals, including integrated and safety-net hospitals. We find evidence that hospitals improved their performance over time in the areas where they have the highest marginal incentives to improve care, and that integrated hospitals responded more than non-integrated hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Medicare/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Medicare/organización & administración , Michigan/epidemiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Reembolso de Incentivo/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo/organización & administración , Estados Unidos , Compra Basada en Calidad/economía , Compra Basada en Calidad/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of patients with multiresistant bacteria (MRB) in rehabilitation facilities is increasing. The increasing costs of hygienic isolation measures reduce resources available for core rehabilitation services. In addition to the existing lack of care, patients with MRB are at further risk of being given lower priority for admission to rehabilitation facilities. Therefore, the Hygiene Commission of the German Society for Neurorehabilitation (DGNR) attempted to quantify the overall risk for deterioration of rehabilitation care due to the financial burden of MRB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To analyze the added costs associated with the rehabilitation of patients with MBR, the DGNR Hygiene Commission identified criteria for a cost assessment. Direct (consumables, personnel and miscellaneous costs) and indirect costs of loss of opportunity were evaluated in seven neurorehabilitation centers in different states across Germany. RESULTS: On average, hygienic isolation measures amounted to direct costs of 144 per day (47 consumables, 92 personnel, 5 for other costs such as extra transportation expenditure) and indirect costs of 274 , totaling 418 per patient with MRB per day. Given that approximately 10% of patients had MRB, the added costs of hygienic isolation measures equaled about one tenth of the overall budget of a rehabilitation center and can be expected to rise with the increasing numbers of patients with MRB. CONCLUSIONS: Admission of patients carrying MRB to neurorehabilitation centers triggers added costs that critically diminish the overall capacity for centers to provide their core rehabilitation services.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación Neurológica/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Portador Sano/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfección/economía , Alemania , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Aislamiento de Pacientes/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & controlRESUMEN
In recent years, accountable care organizations (ACOs) have become more prevalent in the United States. This study describes the origins, implementation, and early results of Minnesota's Medicaid ACO payment model, the Integrated Health Partnership (IHP) demonstration project. We describe the structure of the program and present preliminary evaluation results to document the state's important work and to provide lessons for other states interested in implementing Medicaid ACOs. The IHP program has expanded in size over time, the state has reported significant savings, and evidence exists of capacity building among participating providers. We identify factors that may have contributed to the program's early success, but more work is needed to investigate the specific drivers of quality improvement and savings within Minnesota's ACO program and to compare the design and effects of the IHP with other Medicaid and Medicare ACO programs. We conclude with comments about the future of the state's Medicaid ACO program and situate Minnesota's findings within the context of the broader ACO movement.