Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) ; 18(2): 300-310, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28453041

RESUMEN

Objectives To estimate the cost-effectiveness of administering calcium (1200 mg per day) starting in week 14 of pregnancy to all pregnant women compared to not supplying it to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia. Methods A decision tree was built in TreeAge® with outcome measured in life years gained (LYG) associated with the reduction in maternal deaths. Costs were included from the perspective of the health system in Colombia and expressed in Colombian pesos in 2014 (COP). The discount rate was 0 %. We performed sensitivity univariate and probabilistic analyses for costs and effectiveness. Results Compared to no intervention, calcium supplement is a dominant alternative. If the incidence of preeclampsia is lower than 51.7 per 1 000 pregnant women or the cost per tablet of calcium of 600 mg is greater than COP $507.85, calcium supplement is no longer a cost-effective alternative in Colombia for a threshold of COP $ 45 026 379 (3 times the Colombian per capita GDP of 2013 per LYG). Conclusions Supplying calcium to all pregnant women from week 14 of gestation is a dominant alternative compared to no intervention, which saves 200 LYG, while it decreases costs to the order of COP$5 933 million per 100.000 pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Carbonato de Calcio/economía , Calcio de la Dieta/economía , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Preeclampsia/mortalidad , Preeclampsia/prevención & control , Carbonato de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Colombia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Mortalidad Materna , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo
2.
Nephron Clin Pract ; 124(1-2): 1-9, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24022619

RESUMEN

Bone disease and ectopic calcification are the two main consequences of hyperphosphataemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Observational studies have demonstrated that hyperphosphataemia in CKD is associated with increased mortality. Furthermore, the use of phosphate binders in dialysis patients is associated with significantly lower mortality. The UK Renal Registry data show significant underachievement of phosphate targets in dialysis patients. It is believed to be due to wide variation in how management interventions are used. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has developed a guideline on the management of hyperphosphataemia in CKD. This is based on the evidence currently available using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This review outlines the recommendations including research recommendations and discusses methodology, rationale and challenges faced in developing this guideline and the health economic model used to assess the cost-effectiveness of different phosphate binders.


Asunto(s)
Quelantes/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Quelación/normas , Dietoterapia/normas , Hiperfosfatemia/terapia , Nefrología/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Acetatos/economía , Acetatos/normas , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Carbonato de Calcio/economía , Carbonato de Calcio/normas , Carbonato de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Calcio/economía , Compuestos de Calcio/normas , Compuestos de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Quelantes/economía , Quelantes/normas , Terapia por Quelación/economía , Dietoterapia/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Hiperfosfatemia/economía , Hiperfosfatemia/etiología , Nefrología/economía , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/normas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/economía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Am Coll Nutr ; 20(3): 239-46, 2001 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11444420

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness of calcium supplementation depends not only on the cost of the product but on the efficiency of its absorption. Published cost-benefit analyses assume equal bioavailability for all calcium sources. Some published studies have suggested that there are differences in both the bioavailability and cost of the major calcium supplements. DESIGN: Randomized four period, three-way cross-over comparing single doses of off-the-shelf commercial calcium supplements containing either calcium carbonate or calcium citrate compared with a no-load blank and with encapsulated calcium carbonate devoid of other ingredients; subjects rendered fully vitamin D-replete with 10 microg/day 25(OH)D by mouth, starting one week prior to the first test. SUBJECTS: 24 postmenopausal women METHODS: Pharmacokinetic analysis of the increment in serum total and ionized calcium and the decrement in serum iPTH induced by an oral calcium load, based upon multiple blood samples over a 24-hour period; measurement of the rise in urine calcium excretion. Data analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. Cost calculations based on average retail prices of marketed products used in this study from April through October, 2000. RESULTS: All three calcium sources (marketed calcium carbonate, encapsulated calcium carbonate and marketed calcium citrate) produced identical 24-hour time courses for the increment in total serum calcium. Thus, these were equally absorbed and had equivalent bioavailability. Urine calcium rose slightly more with the citrate than with the carbonate preparations. but the difference was not significant. Serum iPTH showed the expected depression accompanying the rise in serum calcium, and there were no significant differences between products. CONCLUSION: Given the equivalent bioavailability of the two marketed products, the cost benefit analysis favors the less expensive carbonate product.


Asunto(s)
Calcio de la Dieta/economía , Calcio de la Dieta/farmacocinética , Calcio/análisis , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Carbonato de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Carbonato de Calcio/economía , Carbonato de Calcio/farmacocinética , Citrato de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Citrato de Calcio/economía , Citrato de Calcio/farmacocinética , Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Absorción Intestinal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/prevención & control , Posmenopausia
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 31(2): 257-62, 1998 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9469496

RESUMEN

The objective of the study was to evaluate the phosphate-binding efficacy, side effects, and cost of therapy of calcium ketoglutarate granulate as compared with calcium carbonate tablets in patients on chronic hemodialysis. The study design used was a randomized, crossover open trial, and the main outcome measurements were plasma ionized calcium levels, plasma phosphate levels, plasma intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, requirements for supplemental aluminum-aminoacetate therapy, patient tolerance, and cost of therapy. Nineteen patients on chronic hemodialysis were treated with a dialysate calcium concentration of 1.25 mmol/L and a fixed alfacalcidol dose for at least 2 months. All had previously tolerated therapy with calcium carbonate. Of the 19 patients included, 10 completed both treatment arms. After 12 weeks of therapy, the mean (+/-SEM) plasma ionized calcium level was significantly lower in the ketoglutarate arm compared with the calcium carbonate arm (4.8+/-0.1 mg/dL v 5.2+/-0.1 mg/dL; P = 0.004), whereas the mean plasma phosphate (4.5+/-0.3 mg/dL v 5.1+/-0.1 mg/dL) and PTH levels (266+/-125 pg/mL v 301+/-148 pg/mL) did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms. Supplemental aluminum-aminoacetate was not required during calcium ketoglutarate treatment, while two patients needed this supplement when treated with calcium carbonate. Five of 17 (29%) patients were withdrawn from calcium ketoglutarate therapy within 1 to 2 weeks due to intolerance (anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, general uneasiness), whereas the remaining 12 patients did not experience any side effects at all. The five patients with calcium ketoglutarate intolerance all had pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms; four of them had received treatment with cimetidine or omeprazol before inclusion into the study. Calculations based on median doses after 12 weeks showed that the cost of the therapy in Denmark was 10 times higher for calcium ketoglutarate compared with calcium carbonate (US$6.00/d v US$0.65/d). Calcium ketoglutarate may be an effective and safe alternative to treatment with aluminum-containing phosphate binders in patients on hemodialysis who are intolerant of calcium carbonate or acetate because of hypercalcemia. However, care must be exercised when dealing with patients with pre-existing gastrointestinal discomfort. Due to the high cost of the therapy, calcium ketoglutarate should be used only for selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Carbonato de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Cetoglutáricos/administración & dosificación , Fosfatos/sangre , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calcio/sangre , Carbonato de Calcio/efectos adversos , Carbonato de Calcio/economía , Estudios Cruzados , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Ácidos Cetoglutáricos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Cetoglutáricos/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA