Surgical management of giant skin tumor - A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) are of two main types: basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In rare occasions, some of the malignant skin lesions show histopathological characteristics of both BCC and SCC and are known as basosquamous carcinomas (BSC). In some cases of large tumors, extensive reconstructive surgery might be needed to correct the skin defect after the primary excision. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of a 76-year-old Bulgarian male patient who presented with a neglected giant cutaneous tumor with more than a 15-year history of a growing mass in the right deltoid area. On physical exam an enormous exophytic ulcerated and crusted skin lesion measuring around 11×11cm was found. Wide local excision of the lesion with 10-mm resection margins and partial resection of the underlying deltoid muscle were performed due to signs of infiltration. A full-thickness total skin graft from the left inguinal area was harvested to cover the skin defect. Final histopathological examination showed metatypical carcinoma with mixed characteristics of SCC and BCC - BSC, with infiltration of the fatty tissue, deltoid muscle and clear margins of resection, staged as T4R0. Two and a half years after surgery there are no signs of upper arm motor dysfunction and no evidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis on a follow-up PET/CT. DISCUSSION: Following current National Comprehensive Cancer Network's guidelines for primary treatment of BCC, surgical candidates should undergo standard excision with wider surgical margins, postoperative margin assessment and second intention healing, linear repair, or skin graft. Therapeutic strategy for non-operable cases includes administration of radiotherapy or system therapy in the face of Hedgehog pathway inhibitors and programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor. They can provide an alternative solution to unresectable or difficult-to-treat locally advanced cases of BSC. CONCLUSION: Similarly to BCC and SCC, the first-line treatment option for BCS is surgical excision, but surgical margins should be wider than those for low-risk BCC due to the infiltrative growth pattern of this tumor. Favorable esthetic outcome requires precise planning of the reconstructive technique.

Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy as a therapeutic alternative in multiple basal cell carcinoma induced by radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Non-melanoma skin cancer within previously irradiated areas presents a common challenge, requiring innovative therapies. Complex scenarios, like XRT-induced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or Gorlin's syndrome, often involve multiple synchronous tumor lesions where photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers a viable therapeutic alternative. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a 49-year-old male with a history of XRT for brain tumors. The patient was undergoing treatment for recurrent basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) in the right temporal irradiated area, unresponsive to conventional treatments. In the latest evaluation, the patient presented a nodular tumor and several peripheral superficial foci. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was administered using methyl aminolevulinate 160 mg/g in cream (Metvix®) in two sessions spaced 7 days apart before surgery. The photosensitizer was applied 3 h before initiating PDT, and red light exposure was performed with the Aktilite© lamp (wavelength 630 nm, 100 mm distance, voltage 100 to 240 V, frequency 50 Hz, power 180 W) for 7 min. CONCLUSIóN: PDT with methyl aminolevulinate demonstrated efficacy as a neoadjuvant treatment in a case of multiple XRT-induced BCCs before surgery. PDT emerges as a valuable therapeutic alternative for multiple BCCs, particularly in non-responsive cases.

[Current Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma]. / Aktuelles Management des Basalzellkarzinoms.

For the management of basal cell carcinoma, the primary performance of a risk stratification, which is decisive for the further diagnostic and therapeutic steps, is becoming increasingly important.Various non-invasive methods are available to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis is recommended in unclear cases. In poorly displaced lesions, preoperative cross-sectional imaging of the tumor area should be performed to exclude osseous infiltration.The gold standard in treatment remains surgery, which should be performed by means of micrographically controlled surgery if possible. In addition, there are other therapeutic methods such as radiotherapy or a number of topical therapy options (photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy or application of 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod), which can be used in certain cases. Also for advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma, effective drugs are available in the form of the hedgehog inhibitors, for which there is now several years of application experience with regard to efficacy and handling of adverse events. With the PD-1 inhibitor cemiplimab, a further therapeutic option for non-operable or metastatic tumors has been available since June 2021.The most important preventive measure is consistent textile or chemical UV protection in already affected individuals. In addition, nicotinamide and celecoxib can be used orally for prevention. For follow-up, the current S2k guideline recommends regular self-monitoring and standardized medical check-ups.

Implementing structured pathology reporting protocol for non-melanocytic skin cancers: practical considerations.

Non-melanocytic skin cancers (NMSCs) account for five times the incidence of all other cancers combined and cost US $6 billion annually. These are the most frequent specimens encountered in community pathology practice in many Western countries. Lack of standardised structured pathology reporting protocols (SPRPs) can result in omission of critical information or miscommunication leading to suboptimal patient management. The lack of standardised data has significant downstream public health implications, including insufficient data for reliable development of prognostic tools and health-economy planning. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia has developed an NMSC SPRP. A multidisciplinary expert committee including pathologists, surgeons, dermatologists, and radiation and medical oncologists from high volume cancer centres was convened. A systematic literature review was performed to identify evidence for including elements as mandatory standards or best practice guidelines. The SPRP and accompanying commentary of evidence, definitions and criteria was peer reviewed by external stakeholders. Finally, the protocol was revised following feedback and trialled in multiple centres prior to implementation. Some parameters utilised clinically for determining management and prognosis including tumour depth, lymphovascular invasion or distance to the margins lack high level evidence in NMSC. Dermatologists, surgeons, and radiation oncologists welcomed the SPRP. Pathologists indicated that the variety of NMSC specimens ranging from curettes to radical resections as well as significant differences in the biological behaviour of different tumours covered by the NMSC umbrella made use of a single protocol difficult. The feedback included that using a SPRP for low risk NMSC was neither clinically justified nor compensated adequately by the Australian Medicare Reimbursement Schedule. Following stakeholder feedback, the SPRP implementation was restricted to excision specimens of head and neck NMSC; and low-risk NMSC, such as superficial basal cell carcinoma, were excluded. Implementing NMSC SPRP fulfils an unmet clinical need. Unlike other cancers, NMSCs generate a range of specimen types and are reported in a wide range of pathology practices. Limiting use of SPRP to NMSC at higher risk of progression and providing formatted templates for easy incorporation into laboratory information systems were essential to successful deployment. In the future, further consideration should be given to implementing the SPRP to include all relevant specimens, including non-head and neck and low-risk NMSC specimens.

Exploring knowledge gaps in the understanding of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment.

In 2022, National Comprehensive Cancer Network updated the phrase of "complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA)" to "peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA)," which was meant to create more consistency across all treatment modalities and provide clarity to the meaning of total margin evaluation. The aim of this project was to investigate the interpretation of PDEMA across pertinent specialties and to identify any existing knowledge gaps in hopes of improving clinical performance of institutional practice. An electronic survey was administered to medical professionals within the divisions of dermatology and otolaryngology retrieving demographic data and assessing respondents' knowledge on tissue processing techniques and PDEMA. Of the four knowledge-based assessment questions administered, dermatology respondents answered three questions with > 80% accuracy and one question with < 65% accuracy. Otolaryngology respondents answered one question with > 80% accuracy and three with < 65% accuracy. Both groups answered the knowledge-based question evaluating the concept of "what must be true for Mohs or PDEMA to have value" with under 65% accuracy. When comparing dermatology and otolaryngology respondents, only one question which evaluated the proper methods to "achieve processing of the epidermal edge and the base of the tumor along a single plane in the lab" significantly differed between groups, with a percentage correct of 96% for dermatologists compared to 54% for otolaryngologists (p < 0.001). Results were found to be similar when resident physicians were removed from analysis. The overall percent correct for knowledge-based questions was shifted higher for dermatologists compared to otolaryngologists (p = 0.014). This trend was also redemonstrated when analyzing the data excluding residents (p = 0.053).

Complete Margin Assessment Versus Sectional Assessment in Surgically Excised High-Risk Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) are the most diagnosed cancers worldwide and are commonly excised via complete margin assessment (CMA) or excision with sectional assessment (SA). National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines encourage CMA for KC with high-risk features. OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare recurrence outcomes for CMA vs SA in high-risk KC based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for articles reporting recurrences of high-risk KC undergoing excision using CMA or SA. High-risk KCs were defined as recurrent, having perineural invasion (PNI), or basal cell carcinomas (BCC) with aggressive histology. Chi-squared tests and risk ratios evaluated differences between CMA and SA groups, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Pooled percentages of locoregional recurrences were significantly lower with CMA vs SA for all KCs (3.9% [95% CI: 2.9-4.9] vs 13.5% [7.7, 19.2, p = .001]), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with PNI (9.8% [5.4-14.1] vs 32.0% [25.0-39.0], p < .001), and recurrent BCC (4.4% [2.9-5.9] vs 11.9% [8.0-15.8], p < .001). CONCLUSION: For high-risk KCs, recurrence risk was over 3-times greater with SA compared with CMA. Expanded access to CMA for high-risk KC is likely to reduce recurrence risk and improve clinical outcomes.

Concordance in judgment of clinical borders of basal cell carcinomas in Japanese patients: A preliminary study of JCOG2005 (J-BASE-MARGIN).

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common type of skin cancer, and surgical excision with clear margins is the standard of care. Surgical margins are determined based on risk factors (high or low risk) for recurrence according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Japanese basal cell carcinoma guidelines. The clarity of the clinical tumor border (well-defined or poorly defined) is considered a risk factor, and significant discrepancies in the judgment of clinical tumor borders among dermato-oncologists may occur. Therefore, we analyzed the dermato-oncologists' concordance in judging the clinical tumor border of basal cell carcinoma. Forty-seven dermato-oncologists (experts: 37; young trainees: 10) participated in this study. The datasets of clinical and dermoscopic photographs of 79 Japanese cases of head and neck basal cell carcinoma were used to determine the concordance in the judgment of clinical tumor border. The probability of the border that was selected more often was used to calculate the rater agreement rate for each dataset. Correct judgment was defined as a more frequently selected border, and the concordance rate of clarity of clinical tumor border for each dermato-oncologist was calculated based on the definition of the correct judgment. A median concordance rate of 85% or higher for all dermato-oncologists was predefined as an acceptable rate for clinical use. Of the 79 datasets, rater agreement rates were 80-100%, 60-79%, and 51-59% for 55, 19, and five datasets, respectively. The median concordance rate for all dermato-oncologists was 86% (interquartile range: 82-89%). There was no significant difference in the concordance rate between the experts and the trainees (median, 87% vs. 85.5%; p = 0.58). The concordance rates of dermato-oncologists for all datasets were relatively high and acceptable for clinical use.

Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma/Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate: Overview and Update on Rare Prostate Cancer Subtypes.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma/basaloid cell carcinoma of the prostate (ACC/BCC) is a very rare variant of prostate cancer with uncertain behavior. Few cases are reported in the literature. Data on treatment options are scarce. The aim of our work was to retrospectively review the published reports. Thirty-three case reports or case series were analyzed (106 patients in total). Pathological features, management, and follow-up information were evaluated. Despite the relatively low level of evidence given the unavoidable lack of prospective trials for such a rare prostate tumor, the following considerations were made: prostate ACC/BCC is an aggressive tumor often presenting with locally advanced disease and incidental diagnosis occurs during transurethral resection of the prostate for urinary obstructive symptoms. Prostate-specific antigen was not a reliable marker for diagnosis nor follow-up. Adequate staging with Computed Tomography (CT) scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) should be performed before treatment and during follow-up, while there is no evidence for the use of Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Radical surgery with negative margins and possibly adjuvant radiotherapy appear to be the treatments of choice. The response to androgen deprivation therapy was poor. Currently, there is no evidence of the use of truly effective systemic therapies.

Topical hedgehog inhibitors for basal cell carcinoma: how far away are we?

INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) consists of conventional excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. However, surgical excision is not feasible in specific cases, particularly in patients with several BCCs such as those with Gorlin syndrome or individuals receiving immunosuppression after solid-organ transplantation. Additionally, the geriatric population may not be appropriate candidates for surgery. Thus, alternative therapies are needed for these populations. AREAS COVERED: Hedgehog (Hh) inhibitors are approved and effective but are currently available only in oral formulations. These agents such as vismodegib and sonidegib are associated with short-lived responses as well as significant adverse effects including myalgias, dysgeusia, and alopecia. Patidegib and itraconazole are two topical Hh inhibitors agents emerging as alternatives to oral Hh inhibiton for difficult-to-treat BCCs. These agents exhibit limited systemic absorption, leading to improved tolerability; however, an optimal formulation is needed to maximize efficacy and is currently being investigated. EXPERT OPINION: Ongoing and recent clinical studies on topical Hedgehog inhibitors show great promise for the development of an agent with a high therapeutic index and limited adverse effects. If patidegib continues to show clinical efficacy in randomized controlled trials, it may become a universal therapy for all subtypes of difficult-to-treat BCC.

Association Between Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Use and Keratinocyte Carcinoma Risk Among Adults With Atopic Dermatitis.

Importance: Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), primarily used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), carry a black box label warning users about the potential for increased skin cancer risk. The risk associated with keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), the most common cancer, defined as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), remains poorly defined because findings from large-scale postmarketing surveillance studies have not been reported. Objectives: To examine KC risk overall and by subtype (BCC and SCC) among adults with AD exposed to TCIs compared with those exposed to topical corticosteroids (primary comparator group) and those unexposed to TCIs or topical corticosteroids (alternative comparator group) as well as alterations in risk with TCI dose, frequency, and duration of exposure. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large, integrated health care delivery system, of adults 40 years or older (n = 93 746) with a physician-rendered diagnosis of AD or dermatitis. Patients who were diagnosed from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2013, were included, with follow-up through December 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from June 1, 2016, to October 1, 2018. Exposures: Time-varying pharmacy-dispensed TCI exposure (n = 7033) over the study period was compared with topical corticosteroids (n = 73 674) and no TCI or topical corticosteroid exposure (n = 46 141). Main Outcomes and Measures: Electronic pathologic testing-validated incident KCs (n = 7744). Results: Among a cohort of 93 746 members, the mean (SD) age was 58.5 (12.7) years, and 55 023 patients (58.7%) were women. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression revealed no association between TCI exposure and KC risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13) compared with topical corticosteroid exposure. Similarly, there were no significant differences in BCC risk (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14, TCI vs topical corticosteroids) or SCC risk (aHR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.82-1.08, TCI vs topical corticosteroids). Changing the comparator group to unexposed individuals yielded similar findings (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.19, TCI vs unexposed for basal cell carcinoma). There were no associations between TCI dose, frequency, and duration of use and BCC, SCC, or overall KC risk. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this postmarketing surveillance study of adult health plan members with AD revealed no apparent association between TCI exposure and overall KC, BCC, or SCC risk. Secondary analyses examining dose, frequency, and duration of TCI exposure revealed no associations. These findings suggest that use of TCIs may be safe with respect to KC risk among adults with AD.

Topical Fluorouracil Therapy for Residual Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

When treating invasive basal cell carcinoma (BCC) with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), including infiltrative and nodular subtypes, the goal is complete surgical removal of the tumor. In some cases, after several stages of MMS, residual foci of superficial BCC are noted with no dermal invasive components apparent. Some patients and surgeons have opted for halting surgery and treating residual superficial BCC with adjuvant topical fluorouracil. In this retrospective study, this treatment method is shown to be effective with a recurrence rate of BCC of 3.7% over a mean follow up of 28 months. This treatment method reduces the number of stages of MMS as the surgery is stopped was invasive BCC is removed. This can be beneficial when considering the morbidity of prolonged surgical procedures in frail, elderly patients experiencing surgical fatigue, the cost of additional stages, and the cost of advanced repairs due to enlarging defect size. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.4811.

In Search of a Phosphorus Dendrimer-Based Carrier of Rose Bengal: Tyramine Linker Limits Fluorescent and Phototoxic Properties of a Photosensitizer.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a skin cancer treatment alternative to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This method exploits three elements: a phototoxic compound (photosensitizer), light source and oxygen. Upon irradiation by light of a specific wavelength, the photosensitizer generates reactive oxygen species triggering the cascade of reactions leading to cell death. The positive therapeutic effect of PDT may be limited due to low solubility, low tumor specificity and inefficient cellular uptake of photosensitizers. A promising approach to overcome these obstacles involves the use of nanocarrier systems. The aim of this initial study was to determine the potential of the application of phosphorus dendrimers as carriers of a photosensitizer-rose bengal (RB). The primary goal involved the synthesis and in vitro studies of covalent drug-dendrimer conjugates. Our approach allowed us to obtain RB-dendrimer conjugates with the use of tyramine as an aromatic linker between the carrier and the drug. The compounds were characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 31P NMR, size and zeta potential measurements and spectrofluorimetric analysis. The dialysis to check the drug release from the conjugate, flow cytometry to specify intracellular uptake, and singlet oxygen generation assay were also applied. Finally, we used MTT assay to determine the biological activity of the tested compounds. The results of our experiments indicate that the conjugation of RB to phosphorus dendrimers via the tyramine linker decreases photodynamic activity of RB.

Adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Criteria of Complete Circumferential Peripheral and Deep Margin Assessment in Treatment of High-Risk Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has established guidelines for the treatment of keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs). Complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment (CCPDMA) is recommended for "high-risk" tumors that cannot be closed primarily. If flap or grafts are needed and CCPDMA was not used, it is recommended that reconstruction be delayed until achieving clear margins. OBJECTIVE: To measure provider utilization rates of the NCCN guidelines for high-risk KCs and assess barriers that are limiting adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A ten-item questionnaire was distributed to NCCN nonmelanoma skin cancer panel members and physicians participating in KC treatment at academic institutions. RESULTS: Response rate was 49% (57/116). Responses were categorized by practice area: Mohs surgery, pathology, and other specialties: General Dermatology, Otolaryngology, Plastic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Mohs surgeons were most likely to use CCPDMA for tumors meeting NCCN criteria with 14/15 using this technique in a majority of their cases, versus 2/6 pathologists and 10/16 specialists from other fields. Reasons cited for not using CCPDMA included deference to pathologists to determine the appropriate method for margin assessment and logistical difficulty. CONCLUSION: Further efforts are needed to increase adherence to NCCN's guidelines regarding CCPDMA in KCs.

Close and positive margins in non-melanoma skin malignancies of the head and neck. What to do in patients over 75 years of age? A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) of the head and neck is increasing among older adults where it is credited to have a poorer prognosis also because the radicality of the surgery is often missed for a too conservative approach. An assessment of the amount of tumor regrowth and its prognostic consequences, in patients with surgical margins close or involved and older than 75 years, seems thus worth to be pursued in order to provide the best therapeutic strategy. METHODS: 91 cases of basal cell carcinomas (BBC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), in patients older than 75 years of age, were followed from a minimum of one year to up to ten years. 15 patients had close margins at histology while 30 patients turned out to have positive margins. The other 46 patients had clear histologic margins and were considered as a control group. Several parameters were also considered like the site of occurrence, morphology, grading, size, thickness, type of margin involved (lateral, deep or both) and the status of the neck, for the SCC. A cut-off follow-up of two years (less than two years and more than two years) was adopted. RESULTS: Among the BCCs there was one recurrence in the clear margin subgroup (1/23-4.3%) and two in the positive margin subgroup (2/20-10%). For the SCCs there was only one recurrence in the group of positive margins (1/10-10%). Hence the observed rate of recurrence was much lower than reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' opinion the low tendency to recur that NMSC shows in people older than 75 years might validate, at least in this age group, an "economic" surgical approach and a watchful attitude. Larger numbers are needed to assess and possibly validate this strategy, especially for the SCCs.

Approaches to Perineural, Lymphovascular, and Single-Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND: Mohs micrographic surgeons should be adept in identifying and managing perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and single-cell spread (SCS), features denoting high-risk behavior of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the literature and guidelines regarding the diagnosis of PNI, LVI, and SCS in BCC, cSCC, and MAC and examine the role of advanced diagnostic studies, adjuvant therapy, and reconstructive techniques of these high-risk tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search including the following terms: PNI, LVI, SCS, BCC, cSCC, keratinocyte carcinoma, MAC, sentinel lymph node biopsy, radiation, chemotherapy, and staging. Relevant studies, case reports, and review articles were included, as well as National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. RESULTS: Pancytokeratin immunohistochemistry may aid in the diagnosis of high-risk features of BCC and cSCC. Reconstruction of the Mohs defect should be carefully considered to allow for thorough inspection. Radiation therapy should be considered as an adjuvant treatment option for high-risk cSCC and BCC. Close surveillance for recurrence is warranted. CONCLUSION: The Mohs surgeon should be competent in identification of high-risk tumors and to understand how best to manage, further treat, and follow these tumors.

Optimal cosmetic outcomes for basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of nonablative laser management.

Although Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), laser management has been an emerging treatment option that continues to be studied. Nonablative laser therapy is a noninvasive alternative. This study used a combined pulsed dye laser (PDL) and fractional laser approach to treat basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) in conjunction with noninvasive imaging such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to enhance efficacy rates.

Current Basal and Squamous Cell Skin Cancer Management.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Characterize basal and squamous cell carcinomas as low or high risk based on size, location, histology, and clinical features. 2. Understand appropriate surgical margins in low- and high-risk lesions, and other management options, including Mohs micrographic surgery, electrodissection and curettage, topical agents, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and radiation therapy. 3. Discuss adjuvant therapies for locally advanced and metastatic disease, including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies such as hedgehog pathway inhibitors. 4. Educate patients on preventive measures such as skin examinations, sun protection, oral retinoids, and oral nicotinamide (vitamin B3). 5. Devise a reconstructive plan once clear oncologic margins are obtained. SUMMARY: With the growing incidence of basal and squamous cell carcinoma, there is an increasing demand for appropriate oncologic management and aesthetic reconstruction. The goal of this CME article is to provide a foundation of knowledge to accurately diagnose, stage, and treat nonmelanoma skin cancers. In addition, it provides the practicing plastic surgeon alternate tools for managing these skin lesions, including topical agents, destructive therapies, and radiation therapy. Lastly, reconstructive plans for selected soft-tissue defects are discussed.

CO2 laser and photodynamic therapy: Study of efficacy in periocular BCC.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the most common type of skin cancer in the world, usually arises in sun-exposed areas of the skin. The therapeutic approach to periocular BCC has changed in the last few years. Currently the treatment, considering the delicate localization of the disease, must not only ensure complete recovery from the neoplastic disease, but must also satisfy functional and aesthetic criteria. In this study we tried to evaluate the efficacy of CO2 laser and photodynamic therapy in periocular BCC.

Risk of basal cell carcinoma in a randomized clinical trial of aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin may reduce the risk of several types of cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if folic acid is associated with risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). METHODS: BCC incidence was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of aspirin (81 mg daily or 325 mg daily for ~3 years) and/or folic acid (1 mg daily for ~6 years) for the prevention of colorectal adenomas among 1121 participants with a previous adenoma. BCC was confirmed by blinded review of pathology reports. RESULTS: One hundred and four of 958 non-Hispanic white participants were diagnosed with BCC over a median follow-up of 13·5 years. Cumulative incidence of BCC was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7-17] for placebo, 16% (95% CI 11-21) for 81 mg aspirin daily and 15% (95% CI 10-20) for 325 mg aspirin daily [hazard ratio (HR) for any aspirin 1·45 (95% CI 0·93-2·26); HR for 81 mg daily 1·57 (95% CI 0·96-2·56); HR for 325 mg daily 1·33 (95% CI 0·80-2·20)]. BCC risk was higher with aspirin use in those without previous skin cancer but lower with aspirin use in those with previous skin cancer (Pinteraction = 0·02 for 81 mg aspirin daily; Pinteraction = 0·03 for 325 mg aspirin daily). Folic acid supplementation was unrelated to BCC incidence (HR 0·85; 95% CI 0·57-1·27). CONCLUSIONS: Neither aspirin nor folic acid treatment had a statistically significant effect on risk of BCC. Subgroup analysis suggested that chemopreventive effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be specific to those at high risk for BCC.

Carcinoma basocelular. Un reto actual para el dermatólogo / Basal cell carcinoma. An actual challenge for the dermatologist

RESUMEN El carcinoma basocelular es un tumor maligno de origen epitelial, su crecimiento es lento y rara vez metastiza. Este puede producir destrucción local y comprometer extensas áreas de tejido, cartílago y hueso. Existen variantes clínicas e histológicas y constituye el cáncer más frecuente en humanos y su incidencia está en aumento. Se realizó una revisión para exponer los aspectos esenciales sobre factores predisponentes, formas clínicas y diagnóstico, así como las opciones terapéuticas en esta entidad. Se desarrolló una búsqueda en la Biblioteca Virtual de Infomed y Google. Fueron revisados veinticinco trabajos científicos sin limitación de año y país, de los cuales quince pertenecen a los últimos 5 años. El carcinoma basocelular se considera de origen multifactorial, el carcinógeno más importante es la luz ultravioleta. La forma clínica más frecuente es la variedad nodular y la distribución es en cara y cuello. La elección del tratamiento dependerá del tamaño de la lesión, la localización, la edad y estado general del paciente. A pesar de tener baja malignidad y mortalidad, puede ocasionar destrucción y deformidad y repercutir en la vida de los pacientes. El dominio de los factores de riesgo, los elementos para el diagnóstico precoz y las opciones terapéuticas son indispensable para elegir la conducta adecuada frente a la enfermedad y promover cambios en el estilo de vida, que favorezcan la prevención y disminuyan la morbilidad por esta causa (AU).

ABSTRACT Basal cell Carcinoma (BCC) is an epidermal malignant tumor, it has a slow growth and seldom metastases. It can produce local destruction and compromise big tissue areas, cartilage and bone. There are clinical and histological presentations. It is one of the most common cancer in humans and its incidence is increasing. This project's goal is to expose the essential aspects about the predisposal factors, clinic presentations and diagnoses as well as this disorder's therapeutic options.This study was made from different bibliographical revisions. The research was developed on Infomed Database and Google. Twenty five Scientific studies were researched without country and/or timeline limit, from whom fifteen belongs to the last 5 years. BCC is considered to have a multifactorial origin, whose most important carcinogen is the ultraviolet light. The most frequent clinical presentation is the nodular and the most common distribution is face and neck. The treatment choice depends on the tumor size, its distribution and the patient's age and current state. Although it is a low malignancy and low-death rate neoplasia, it can cause tissue destruction and affect patient's social life. The management of the risk factors, the elements for the early diagnosis and the therapeutic options are indispensable to choose the adequate behavior for the disorder and promote life style changes that favor the prevention and lower the morbidity rate (AU).