Hyperthermic chest wall re-irradiation in recurrent breast cancer: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively investigate the role of re-irradiation (re-RT) combined with hyperthermia (HT) in a contemporary cohort of patients affected by recurrent breast cancer (RBC). METHODS: Within the prospective registry HT03, patients with resected RBC and previous irradiation were included. Re-RT was applied to the recurrence region with doses of 50-50.4 Gy, with a boost up to 60-60.4 Gy to the microscopically or macroscopically positive resection margins (R1/R2) region. Concurrent HT was performed at 40-42 ℃. Primary endpoint was LC. Acute and late toxicity, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were also evaluated. RESULTS: 20 patients and 21 RBC were analyzed. Median re-RT dose was 50.4 Gy and a median of 11 HT fractions were applied. Re-RT+HT was well tolerated, with three patients who experienced a grade (G) 3 acute skin toxicity and no cases of ≥G3 late toxicity. With a median follow up of 24.7 months, two local relapses occurred. Ten patients experienced regional and/or distant disease progression. Five patients died, four of them from breast cancer. PFS was favorable in patients treated with re-RT+HT for the first recurrence with doses of 60 Gy. A trend towards better CSS was found in patients with negative or close margins and after doses of 60 Gy. CONCLUSION: Full-dose re-RT+HT for RBC is well tolerated, provides good LC, and seems to be more effective when applied at the time of the first relapse and after doses of 60 Gy. The registry will be continued for validation in a larger cohort and with longer follow-up.

Exclusive alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer: 20 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is crucial because local relapses may be highly symptomatic and are commonly associated with distant metastasis. With a median follow-up of 20 years, we report here the long-term results of a monocentric clinical trial combining primary chemotherapy (CT) with a schedule of anthracycline-based CT and an alternating split-course of radiotherapy (RT*CT) without mastectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 1983 to December 1989, 124 women with nonmetastatic IBC (T4d M0) were treated with three cycles of primary AVCMF chemotherapy (anthracycline, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) and then an alternating RT*CT schedule followed by three cycles of FAC. Hormonal therapy was systematically administered: ovarian irradiation (12 Gy in four fractions) or tamoxifen 20 mg daily. RESULTS: Local control was achieved in 82% of patients. The 10- and 20-year local relapse rates were 26% and 33%, respectively, but only 10% of locally controlled cases were not associated with concurrent distant metastasis. The 10- and 20-year overall survival rates were 39% and 19%, respectively. Severe fibrosis occurred in 54% of patients, grade 3 brachial plexus neuropathy in 4%, grade 2 pneumonitis in 9%. Grade 1, 2 and 3 cardiac toxicity was observed in 3.8%, 3.8% and 1.2% of cases respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This combined regimen allowed good long-term local control without surgery. Survival rates were similar to those obtained with conventional regimens (primary chemotherapy, total mastectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy). Since IBC continues to be an entity with a dismal prognosis, this approach, safely combining preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy and systemic treatments, should be reassessed when suitable targeted agents are available.

Concomitant intensive chemoradiotherapy induction in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer: long-term follow-up.

The aim of this study was to evaluate with a long follow-up the efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and to evaluate the breast conservation rate. Between 1990 and 2000, 66 non-metastatic patients with IBC were treated with chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation. The induction chemotherapy consisted of epirubicine, cyclophosphamide and vindesine, in association with split-course bi-fractionated irradiation to a total dose of 65 Gy with concomitant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Maintenance chemotherapy consisted of high-dose methotrexate and six cycles of epirubicine, cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil. Hormonal treatment was given if indicated. Mastectomy was not systemic. Among 65 evaluable patients, 57 (87.6%) achieved a complete clinical response and had a breast conservation. Only six loco regional relapses were noted in six patients with a delay of 20 months and with concomitant metastatic dissemination in four cases. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 28 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 63 months and median follow-up was 55.5 months. Induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation is feasible in patients with IBC, permitting a breast conservation with a high rate of local control with an OS comparable to that of the best recent series.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in patients with documented node-positive breast cancer at presentation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for incorporating lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. Previous studies of sentinel node biopsy performed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have largely reported on patients whose prechemotherapy, pathologic axillary nodal status was unknown. We report findings using a novel comprehensive approach to axillary management of node-positive-patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We evaluated 54 consecutive breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal metastases at the time of diagnosis that underwent lymphatic mapping with nodal biopsy as well as concomitant axillary lymph node dissection after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All cases were treated at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2001 and 2005. RESULTS: The sentinel node identification rate after delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 98%. Thirty-six patients (66%) had residual axillary metastases (including eight patients that had undergone resection of metastatic sentinel nodes at the time of diagnosis), and in 12 cases (31%) the residual metastatic disease was limited to the sentinel lymph node. The final, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy sentinel node was falsely negative in three cases (8.6%). The negative final sentinel node accurately identified patients with no residual axillary disease in 17 cases (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed after the delivery of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with documented nodal disease at presentation accurately identified cases that may have been downstaged to node-negative status and can spare this subset of patients (32%) from experiencing the morbidity of an axillary dissection.

Neoadjuvant interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This is the first study investigating neoadjuvant interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. The goal was to evaluate the type of surgical treatment, histopathologic response, side effects, local control, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 53 patients, who could not be treated with breast-conserving surgery due to initial tumor size (36/53) or due to an unfavorable breast-tumor ratio (17/53), were analyzed retrospectively. All but one were in an intermediate/high-risk group (St. Gallen criteria). The patients received a neoadjuvant protocol consisting of systemic chemotherapy combined with fractionated HDR brachytherapy (2 x 5 Gy/day, total dose 30 Gy). In cases, where breast-conserving surgery was performed, patients received additional external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT, 1.8 Gy/day, total dose 50.4 Gy). In patients, who underwent mastectomy but showed an initial tumor size of T3/T4 and/or more than three infiltrated lymph nodes, EBRT was also performed. RESULTS: In 30/53 patients (56.6%) breast-conserving surgery could be performed. The overall histopathologic response rate was 96.2% with a complete remission in 28.3% of patients. 49/53 patients were evaluable for follow-up. After a median of 58 months (45-72 months), one patient showed a mild fibrosis of the breast tissue, three patients had mild to moderate lymphatic edema of the arm. 6/49 (12.2%) patients died of distant metastases, 4/49 (8.2%) were alive with disease, and 39/49 (79.6%) were free from disease. Local recurrence was observed in only one case (2%) 40 months after primary therapy. After mastectomy, this patient is currently free from disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of interstitial HDR brachytherapy and chemotherapy is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment in patients with breast cancer. Compared to EBRT, treatment time is short. Postoperative EBRT of the whole breast -- if necessary -- is still possible after neoadjuvant brachytherapy. Even though the number of patients does not permit definite conclusions, the results are promising regarding survival and the very low rate of local recurrences.

Improved disease-free survival with epirubicin-based chemoendocrine adjuvant therapy compared with tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive, estrogen-receptor-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results of French Adjuvant Study Group 02 and 07 trials.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between epirubicin-based chemoendocrine therapy and tamoxifen alone in one to three node-positive (N1-3), estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed, retrospectively, 457 patients randomized in FASG 02 and 07 trials who received: tamoxifen alone (30 mg/day, 3 years); or FEC50 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, six cycles every 21 days) plus tamoxifen started concurrently. Radiotherapy was delivered after the third cycle in FASG 02 trial, and after the sixth in FASG 07 trial. RESULTS: The 9-year DFS rates were 72% with tamoxifen and 84% with FEC50-tamoxifen (P = 0.008). The multivariate analysis showed that pathological tumor size >2 cm was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002), and treatment effects remained significantly in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.0008). The 9-year overall survival rates were 78% and 86%, respectively (P = 0.11). In the multivariate model, there was a trend in favor of chemoendocrine therapy (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The addition of FEC50 adjuvant chemotherapy to tamoxifen significantly improves long-term DFS in N1-3, ER+ and postmenopausal women. Chemoendocrine therapy seems to be more effective than tamoxifen in terms of long-term survival.

t(8;16) AML developed subsequent to breast cancer therapy.

We report a breast cancer patient who developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) one year following her adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil. Cytogenetic examination of bone marrow samples resulted in t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3), which is a chromosome rearrangement observed in de novo and treatment related AML M4/M5 with a poor prognosis.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer: an early response predicts good prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two LABC patients were treated with neoadjuvant iFAC chemotherapy including infusional 5-FU (1000 mg/m2, continuous intravenous infusion, days 1-3), adriamycin (40 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, intravenous bolus, day 1) every 3 weeks until maximum tumor response. Patients subsequently received surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy as appropriate. RESULTS: Downstaging occurred in 71 of the 82 patients (86.6%). Seventy-two patients (67 patients with downstaging and five patients without downstaging) were resectable (resectability rate, 87.8%). The clinical response rate was 84.2%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 17.1% and a pathological CR rate of 7.8%. During 891 cycles of chemotherapy, the most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was leukopenia (36.0%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The median follow-up period was 51 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 66 months, and a 5 year OS rate of 50.9% for all patients. The 5 year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the 64 patients who underwent surgery were 55.8% and 44.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with iFAC had a comparable response rate and DFS to the conventional bolus FAC regimen, with an acceptable toxicity in LABC using the AJCC 2002 staging system. An early response to neoadjuvant iFAC was a favorable prognostic factor.

Chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation in inflammatory breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and irradiation in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Between January 1990 and December 1998, forty-eight non-metastatic patients with clinical or occult IBC were treated with chemotherapy and irradiation. The induction chemotherapy consisted of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and vindesin, in association with split-course bi-fractionated irradiation to a total dose of 65 Gy with concomitant cisplatin and fluorouracil. Maintenance chemotherapy consisted of high-dose methotrexate and 6 cycles of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil Hormonal treatment was given routinely but mastectomies were not routinely performed. A high rate of locoregional control was obtained in 47 evaluable patients of whom 93.6 % achieved a complete clinical response. Three patients had locoregional relapses, always with concomitant metastatic dissemination. In 47 patients, 21 developed metastatic dissemination with a median delay of 23 months. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 45 months. Median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached after a median follow-up of 44.5 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 53 % and the 3-year OS rate was 71 %. Toxicity was mainly hematological. During the induction therapy, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 54 % of patients, grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 23 % and grade 3 or 4 anemia in 8 %. The administration of induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation is feasible in patients with IBC. The hematological toxicity of this treatment approach is significant but nevertheless, the treatment achieves a high degree of locoregional control and improved survivaL

[Conservative therapy of I and II stage breast cancer--successful alternative to modified radical mastectomy]. / Konservativnoe lechenie raka molochnoi zhelezy I i II stadii--uspeshnaia al'ternativa modifitsirovannoi radikal'noi mastéktomii.

A clinical trial was conducted at the Center's Clinic to compare breast conserving treatment (quandrantectomy + radiation) (BCT) with modified radical mastectomy (M). It included 190 patients with stage I-II carcinoma up to 30 mm (BCT with "negative margin"--122; M--68). All the patients had undergone full axillary dissection. Mean total dose of 48.8 Gy was delivered to the whole breast by means of an external beam. No boost to tumor bed was given. Forty-one percent of tumors in the mastectomy group were of medial or central localization. The locoregional recurrence rates were significantly different (BCT--4.09 vs. M--20.5%; p < 0.001). However, the differences between distant metastasis occurrence and 5-year survival were not (BCT--4.91 and 95.6%; M--11.76 and 91.8%; p > 0.5, respectively). Nor were they significant for the localization/5-year survival relationship: lateral breast tumor--92%, medial--100% and central--89% (p > 0.6).

The presence of proliferative breast disease with atypia does not significantly influence outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the benign background breast-tissue change of atypical hyperplasia (AH) on outcome in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and sixty women with Stage I--II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation from 1982-1994 had pathologic assessment of their background adjacent benign breast tissue. The median follow-up was 5.6 years (range 0.1-15). The median age was 55 years (range 24-88). Of these, 23% had positive axillary nodes; 25% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or CAF) with (9%) or without (17%) tamoxifen. Of the total, 24% received adjuvant tamoxifen alone. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 131 patients with atypical hyperplasia (ductal, 99 patients; lobular, 20 pts; and type not specified, 12 pts), and 329 patients with no proliferative changes or proliferative changes without atypia. RESULT: A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for method of detection, primary tumor size, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), pathologic nodal status, region(s) treated with radiation, and type of adjuvant therapy. Patients with atypical hyperplasia (AH) had smaller primary tumors (T1 80% vs. 70%) more often detected solely by mammography (51% vs. 36%) with negative axillary nodes (87% vs. 73%) and radiation treatment to the breast only (93% vs. 78%). LCIS was observed in 9% of the patients with AH and 3% of those without AH. Patients with AH more often received tamoxifen alone (32% vs. 21%), rather than chemotherapy (15% vs. 29%). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for race, age, menopausal status, family history, histology, histologic subtype DCIS when present, the presence or absence of an extensive intraductal component, final margin status, estrogen or progesterone receptor status, use of re-excision, or total radiation dose to the primary. The 5- and 10-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates were 2% and 12% for patients with AH and 4% and 8% for those without AH (p=0.44). Younger women or those with a positive family history of breast cancer with AH did not have an increased rate of breast failure when compared to similar patients without AH. There were no significant differences in the 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of distant metastases (AH 5- and 10-year 7% and 7%, no AH 5- and 10-year 8% and 16%,p=0.31), regional node recurrence (AH 1% and 1%, no AH 1% and 1%,p=0.71), contralateral breast cancer (AH 3% and 3%, no AH 3% and 8%,p=0.71), overall survival (AH 95% and 86%, no AH 95% and 89%, p=0.79), or cause-specific survival (AH 98% and 95%, no AH 96% and 91%,p=0.27). Subset analysis for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastases, overall, and cause-specific survival for T1 vs. T2 tumors and path node-negative vs. path node-positive patients revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: AH was not associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer in this study of patients with invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Therefore, the presence of proliferative changes with atypia in background benign breast tissue should not be a contraindication to breast-conservation therapy.

Conservative treatment feasibility with induction chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm.

BACKGROUND: The traditional surgical treatment for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm is mastectomy. To avoid mutilating surgery, the authors administered primary chemotherapy to 158 patients with operable nonmetastatic large breast carcinoma with a TNM classification of T2 greater than 3 cm and T3 with a lymph node status of N0-N1. Conservative treatment was proposed for patients responding to the chemotherapy and whose tumor was reduced to 3 cm or less. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and treatment results of this strategy. METHODS: The mean patient age was 50.4 years. Eighty-two patients had T2 carcinomas greater than 3 cm, and 76 had T3 carcinoma. Fifty-four tumors were classified as lymph node status N0, and 104 as N1. Mean tumor size was 5.6 cm. Patients were treated with three courses of the NVCF regimen (mitoxantrone, vindesin, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil) or the EVCF regimen, in which mitoxantrone was replaced by epirubicin every 4 weeks, and then administered with a radiosurgical combination. RESULTS: The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was 60.8% with 20.2% complete tumor regression. Twenty-one percent of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy toxic effects, which were all acceptable and reversible. Breast-conserving treatment was feasible in 48.7% of patients (77 of 158). Forty-five patients (28.5%) were treated with a radiosurgical combination (tumorectomy plus radiation therapy), whereas 32 (20.2%) were treated with radiotherapy alone (external irradiation and brachytherapy). Other patients were treated with mastectomy. Age, tumor stage, histology, hormonal status, and hormonal receptor rate had no influence on the frequency of the observed regressions. Isolated recurrences occurred in 11 patients, 6 who were treated conservatively and 5 who were treated with mastectomy. Metastatic relapses were observed in 38 patients (14.6% in the chemotherapy responders and 38.7% in the nonresponders) (P < 0.02). Five-year actuarial survival was 73.2% and was significantly higher for responders to the induction treatment. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that primary chemotherapy and radiosurgical breast-conserving treatment is feasible and is an alternative to mastectomy for patients with large operable breast carcinoma who are responders to the induction treatment. The long term benefit of this strategy must be evaluated in well designed controlled trials.