Evaluation of active breathing control-moderate deep inspiration breath-hold in definitive non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Active Breathing Control-moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (ABC-mDIBH) on tumor motion and critical organ doses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiotherapy. 23 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were included in the study. All patients were scanned at free breathing and ABC-mDIBH for radiation treatment planning. 3 separate treatment plans were generated for each patient including one plan with ABC-mDIBH and uniform margins, one plan with free breathing and uniform margins, and one plan with free breathing and 3-dimensional non-uniform margins determined by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and XVI Motion View (X-ray Volume Imaging, Elekta, UK). Critical organ dose-volumes and physical lung parameters were comparatively evaluated on 3 separate dose-volume histograms of each patient acquired from planning software. Individual tumor motion of each patient with and without ABC-mDIBH was documented and compared. Use of ABC-mDIBH resulted in statistically significant improvement in physical lung parameters of V20 (lung volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy) and mean lung dose (MLD) which are predictors of radiation pneumonitis (p<0.001). Reduction in spinal cord dose and tumor motion with ABC-mDIBH was also statistically significant (p<0.001). ABC-mDIBH increases normal lung tissue sparing in definitive NSCLC radiotherapy by improving physical lung parameters along with spinal cord dose reduction through exact tumor immobilization. The incorporation of ABC-mDIBH into NSCLC radiotherapy may have implications for potential margin reduction and dose escalation to improve treatment outcomes.

Assessment of objective responses using volumetric evaluation in advanced thymic malignancies and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of tumor response by standard response criteria is challenging in thymic malignancies, especially when the pleura is involved, as it often is in stage IV disease. In this study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of volumetric response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (volumetrics) for evaluating response in patients with thymic malignancies treated on a phase II study of belinostat. METHODS: We evaluated the tumor responses of 25 patients with thymic cancer using computed tomography-based RECIST, World Health Organization (WHO), modified RECIST, and volumetrics. As a control, we assessed 37 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with RECIST and volumetrics. RESULTS: Agreement analyses in 23 patients with thymic cancer at the time of RECIST-determined progressive disease (PD) compared volumetrics with RECIST, modified RECIST, and WHO criteria. Use of volumetrics was associated with 22% discordance compared with RECIST, 15% versus modified RECIST, and 22% versus WHO criteria. Volumetrics revealed PD 72 days earlier than RECIST (p = 0.016). In another cohort of 35 patients with NSCLC, there was 9% discordance between volumetrics and RECIST at the time of PD. Volumetrics demonstrated PD 32 days earlier than RECIST in NSCLC (p = 0.0078). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that volumetrics might improve detection of PD. Prospective evaluation of this technique in a larger series of patients with thymic malignancies will be required.