Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breast Dis ; 41(1): 1-3, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34219707

RESUMEN

During the first hit of SARS-COVID pandemic, an important reorganization of Healthcare Services has been done, and new protocols and pathways to protect frail patients like oncological patients were designed. The second hit of pandemic had stressed these new pathways and suggests to health-workers some improvements for safer management of patents.We reported our experience in organizing the clinical pathway of neoadjuvant therapy candidate patients based on the execution of sentinel lympho-node biopsy and the placement of implantable venous access port in the same access to operating room before neoadjuvant chemotherapy suggesting a possible organizational model. In the period October-December 2020 we have included in this new type of path twelve patients and we have not registered any cases of COVID among the patients included. We think this new path, adopted amid the second hit, will be useful for all Breast Units that are facing the challenge of guaranteeing the highest standards of care in a historical moment where the health emergency occupies the efforts of health workers and the economic resources of health systems.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Vías Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/normas
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(9): 1437-1441, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800661

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of port and catheter tip cultures on the clinical management of port-related infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients whose ports were removed for infection between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified. The study sample included 68 ports removed for suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and 27 ports removed for local infection. Port surface, catheter tip, and blood culture results were recorded. Antimicrobial therapy before and after port removal was recorded. The impact of culture results on port infection management was determined. RESULTS: Of the 68 ports removed from patients with CRBSI, 78% received empiric antibiotics. Of these patients, blood cultures led to a change in therapy in 77%. Catheter tip cultures were positive in 32% whereas port surface cultures were positive in 53% of patients. Culture results did not influence antimicrobial therapy in any patient with CRBSI. Of 27 port removals performed for local infection, catheter tip cultures were positive in 41% whereas port surface cultures were positive in 59% of patients. Port surface cultures led to a change in therapy in 33% of local infections. Port surface cultures were significantly more likely to impact management if removal was performed for local infection than for CRBSI (33% vs. 0%, respectively; P < .001). Port surface cultures were inclusive of all positive catheter tip cultures. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with suspected CRBSI, blood cultures alone are sufficient to guide therapy. Port cultures may be justified in the setting of local infection. Catheter tip cultures are unnecessary if port surface cultures are performed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Palliat Support Care ; 18(1): 113-117, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31439075

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The case of a non-oncological patient at the end of his life, admitted to a Palliative Care Unit (PCU), is presented. After a failed attempt to place a central venous catheter (CVC) and another placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), the patient exhibited high anxiety regarding a midline catheter (MC) and refused its placement, even though this was necessary for the administration of intravenous drugs to control dyspnea and other complex symptoms that he presented. METHOD: An intervention through clinical hypnosis for successful MC placement and symptom control is described. RESULT: Through clinical hypnosis and interdisciplinary teamwork, it was possible to place a MC, necessary for symptomatic control of a complex patient. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULT: This case exemplifies hypnosis as a simple procedure that is easy to apply, accepted by the patient, and effective in the implementation of invasive procedures and symptom control in PCUs.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Hipnosis/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Curr Nutr Rep ; 7(4): 324-328, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30264353

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) pose a significant risk to patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Recurrent loss of catheters can lead to scarring and eventual loss of central access, a potentially fatal situation for patients dependent on HPN. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, the standard of care to treat these infections required catheter removal. More recently, several studies have indicated that many CRBSI can be treated without removal of the catheter. Successful treatment without removal can be achieved by intentionally following a catheter salvage protocol. We define this as a previously defined protocol to accurately diagnose CRBSI, identify the organism(s) involved, and effectively treat not only the blood stream infection, but also sterilize the catheter. For patients on HPN with CRBSI, consider attempting line salvage if the patient is not suffering from severe sepsis, other infection related complications, or certain specific infections. Success rates vary depending on the organism causing the infection and the risks; benefits and chance of success should be considered when deciding to attempt line salvage.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Contaminación de Equipos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Esterilización , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/instrumentación , Selección de Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Kurume Med J ; 65(1): 17-21, 2018 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30158359

RESUMEN

Cerebral air embolism following central venous catheter (CVC) removal is extremely rare. We report a case of cerebral air embolism with loss of consciousness after removal of CVC caused by pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM). Computed tomography revealed air bubbles in the internal carotid arteries along the sulci in the cerebral hemispheres, as well as a PAVM. The cerebral air embolism was treated with hyperbaric oxygen and intravenous thrombolytic therapy, and transcatheter embolization of the PAVM was performed. When inserting/removing CVC in a patient with a small PAVM, treatment of the PAVM, irrespective of its size, could prevent the type of complication that occurred in our present case.


Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/complicaciones , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Embolia Aérea/etiología , Embolia Intracraneal/etiología , Arteria Pulmonar/anomalías , Venas Pulmonares/anomalías , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/terapia , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Embolia Aérea/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Aérea/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolización Terapéutica , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Embolia Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Intracraneal/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Trombolítica
6.
Nutrients ; 10(9)2018 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149607

RESUMEN

Patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) are dependent on central venous access for long-term sustenance, and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. As such, there is much interest in finding new methods for preventing CRBSIs in patients on HPN. As it is thought that these infections are preceded by microbial colonization of the catheter, one approach is to use antimicrobial catheter lock solutions. Although antibiotic catheter lock solutions have been present for decades, their use has been mostly limited to the treatment of CRBSIs due to concern for promoting microbial resistance. Recently, however, with the advent of non-antibiotic antimicrobial catheter lock solutions, this approach is gaining popularity as a promising method to decrease rates of CRBSI in HPN patients.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/instrumentación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Factores Protectores , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Vasc Access ; 19(4): 382-386, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent reviews support that hypnosis has great potential for reducing pain and anxiety during mini-invasive surgery. Here, we assessed the feasibility of hypnotic induction session as adjunct therapy in conscious sedation for venous access device implantation. Primary outcomes were safety and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Thirty consecutive women with breast cancer were proposed adjunct of hypnosis before implantation under conscious sedation (midazolam: 0.5 mg ± bolus of Ketamin: 5 mg on demand) indicated for chemotherapy. Self-hypnosis was programmed and guided by one of two trained anesthesiologists. Implantation was performed by one of two experimented surgeons. It consisted of blind subclavian implantation of Braun ST 305 devices using a percutaneous technique adapted from Selinger's procedure. Clinical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. A comprehensive custom-made questionnaire recorded patient satisfaction. RESULTS: In all, 30/30 patients consented to the procedure. The median age was 54 years (range: 35-77 years). The primary procedure was successful in 29/30. One case was converted into internal jugular vein access after a first attempt. Median length time of the implantation procedure in the operative room was 20 min (range: 10-60 min). Median length time in the recovery room preceding home discharge was 65 min (range: 15-185 min). None of the patients suffered complications. The satisfaction rate was ≥90%, 27/30 patients would get hypnosis in case of reimplantation if necessary and 27/30 would recommend this procedure to others. CONCLUSION: Hypnosis under conscious sedation appears feasible and safe for port implantation under conscious sedation in cancer patients. Further studies would determine the exact value of hypnosis effectiveness.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Sedación Consciente , Hipnosis , Vena Subclavia , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Satisfacción del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Vasc Access ; 19(6): 521-527, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29552930

RESUMEN

For arrhythmia treatment or sudden cardiac death prevention in hemodialysis patients, there is a frequent need for placement of a cardiac implantable electronic device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device). Leads from a cardiac implantable electronic device can cause central vein stenosis and carry the risk of tricuspid regurgitation or contribute to infective endocarditis. In patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring vascular access and cardiac implantable electronic device, the best strategy is to create an arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral upper limb for a cardiac implantable electronic device and avoidance of central vein catheter. Fortunately, cardiac electrotherapy is moving toward miniaturization and less transvenous wires. Whenever feasible, one should avoid transvenous leads and choose alternative options such as subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, epicardial leads, and leadless pacemaker. Based on recent reports on the leadless pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator effectiveness, in patients with rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (high risk of renal failure) or glomerular filtration rate <20 mL/min/1.73 m2, this option should be considered by the implanting cardiologist for future access protection.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Marcapaso Artificial , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/mortalidad , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/mortalidad , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Vasc Access ; 18(Suppl. 1): 34-38, 2017 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28297055

RESUMEN

The prevention of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) in hemodialysis (HD) patients remains a challenge because of high morbidity and mortality associated to CRBSI. Alternative locking solutions (ALS) containing an antithrombotic substance with additional antimicrobial or antibiofilm properties (citrate, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA], 70% ethanol, thrombolytics) with or without the addition of molecules with specific antimicrobial activity (antibiotics, taurolidine, paraben-methylene-blue) has been proposed with the aim to prevent or eradicate intraluminal biofilm colonization and subsequent CRBSI. In this review, we examine the available evidence concerning their efficacy and potential side effects, in order to determine whether ALS should be implemented widely or only in selected cases.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Diálisis Renal , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Biopelículas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Vasc Access ; 17(6): 453-464, 2016 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27516141

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate lock solution for central venous access devices is still to be defined. GAVeCeLT - the Italian group for venous access devices - has developed a consensus on the evidence-based criteria for the choice and the clinical use of the most appropriate lock solution for central venous catheters (excluding dialysis catheters). METHOD: After the constitution of a panel of experts, a systematic collection and review of the literature has been performed, focusing on clinical studies dealing with lock solutions used for prevention of occlusion (heparin, citrate, urokinase, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator [r-TPA], normal saline) or for prevention of infection (citrate, ethanol, taurolidine, ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], vancomycin, linezolid and other antibiotics), in both adults and in pediatric patients. Studies on central lines used for dialysis or pheresis, on peripheral venous lines and on arterial lines were excluded from this analysis. Studies on lock solutions used for treatment of obstruction or infection were not considered. The consensus has been carried out according to the Delphi method. RESULTS: The panel has concluded that: (a) there is no evidence supporting the heparin lock; (b) the prevention of occlusion is based on the proper flushing and locking technique with normal saline; (c) the most appropriate lock solution for infection prevention should include citrate and/or taurolidine, which have both anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity, with negligible undesired effects if compared to antibiotics; (d) the patient populations most likely to benefit from citrate/taurolidine lock are yet to be defined. CONCLUSIONS: The actual value of heparinization for non-dialysis catheters should be reconsidered. Also, the use of lock with substances with anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity (such as citrate or taurolidine) should be taken into consideration in selected populations of patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Irrigación Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Injury ; 47(10): 2110-2116, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27381327

RESUMEN

Holistic ultrasound is a total body examination using an ultrasound device aiming to achieve immediate patient care and decision making. In the setting of trauma, it is one of the most fundamental components of care of the injured patients. Ground-breaking imaging software allows physicians to examine various organs thoroughly, recognize imaging signs early, and potentially foresee the onset or the possible outcome of certain types of injuries. Holistic ultrasound can be performed on a routine basis at the bedside of the patients, at admission and during the perioperative period. Trauma care physicians should be aware of the diagnostic and guidance benefits of ultrasound and should receive appropriate training for the optimal management of their patients. In this paper, the findings of holistic ultrasound in trauma patients are presented, with emphasis on the lungs, heart, cerebral circulation, abdomen, and airway. Additionally, the benefits of ultrasound imaging in interventional anaesthesia techniques such as ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and central vein catheterization are described.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cuidados Críticos , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Bloqueo Nervioso/instrumentación , Nervios Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
12.
Korean J Intern Med ; 31(3): 543-51, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27074671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fragmented care in nephrology can cause treatment delays. Nephrologists are qualified to perform vascular access-related procedures because they understand the pathophysiology of renal disease and perform physical examination for vascular access. We compared treatment delays associated with tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) placement between interventional radiologists and nephrologists. METHODS: We collected data by radiologists from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and by nephrologists from since July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. We compared the duration from the hemodialysis decision to TDC placement (D-P duration) and hemodialysis initiation (D-H duration), catheter success and the complication rate, and the frequency and the usage time of non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NDCs) before TDC placement. RESULTS: The study analyzed 483 placed TDCs: 280 TDCs placed by radiologists and 203 by nephrologists. The D-P durations were 319 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 180 to 1,057) in the radiologist group and 140 minutes (IQR, 0 to 792) in the nephrologist group. Additionally, the D-H durations were 415 minutes (IQR,260 to 1,091) and 275 minutes (IQR, 123 to 598), respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.00). The TDC success rate (95.3% vs. 94.5%, respectively; p = 0.32) and complication rate (16.2% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.11) did not differ between the groups. The frequency (24.5 vs. 26%, respectively; p = 0.72) and the usage time of NDC (8,451 vs. 8,416 minutes, respectively; p = 0.91) before TDC placement were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Trained interventional nephrologists could perform TDC placement safely, minimizing treatment delays.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrólogos , Radiología Intervencionista , Diálisis Renal , Especialización , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 40(5): 699-704, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25224728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a serious complication in the provision of home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Antibiotic salvage of central venous catheters (CVCs) in CRBSI is recommended; however, this is based on limited reports. We assessed the efficacy of antibiotic salvage of CRBSIs in HPN patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All confirmed CRBSIs occurring in patients receiving HPN in a national intestinal failure unit (IFU), between 1993 and 2011, were analyzed. A standardized protocol involving antibiotic and urokinase CVC locks and systemic antibiotics was used. RESULTS: In total, 588 patients were identified with a total of 2134 HPN years, and 297 CRBSIs occurred in 137 patients (65 single and 72 multiple CRBSIs). The overall rate of CRBSI in all patients was 0.38 per 1000 catheter days. Most (87.9%) infections were attributable to a single microorganism. In total, 72.5% (180/248) of CRBSIs were salvaged when attempted (coagulase-negative staphylococcus, 79.8% [103/129], Staphylococcus aureus, 56.7% [17/30]; polymicrobial infections, 67.7% [21/30]; and miscellaneous, 66.1% [39/59]). CVC salvage was not attempted in 49 episodes because of life-threatening sepsis (n = 18), fungal infection (n = 7), catheter problems (n = 20), and CVC tunnel infection (n = 4). Overall, the CVC was removed in 33.7% (100/297) of cases. There were 5 deaths in patients admitted to the IFU for management of the CRBSI (2 severe sepsis at presentation, 3 metastatic infection). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported series of catheter salvage in CRBSIs and demonstrates successful catheter salvage in most cases when using a standardized protocol.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
J Pediatr Surg ; 50(10): 1707-10, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26100692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical success and complications of image-guided central venous port (CVP) placement with subclavian vein (SCV) access in pediatric oncology population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two children (52 boys, 40 girls; mean age, 8.5 years) underwent CVP implantation under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. SCV access was firstly attempted under ultrasonographic guidance and CVP implantation was performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Technical success, peri-procedural (<24h) complication, and post-procedural (>24h) complication were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 102 CVPs were implanted in 92 children with a mean catheter time of 364 days (total, 38,224 days; range, 14-1911 days). In three small children, conversion of SCV access to internal jugular vein access yielded a primary technical success rate of 97.1% and overall technical success rate of 100%. Three minor peri-procedural complications were observed (2.9%) and seven post-procedural infectious complications occurred (infection rate, 6.7%; 0.18/1000 catheter days). No pneumothorax, catheter malposition, venous thrombosis, or mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: Image-guided CVP placement with SCV access in a pediatric population was performed with high technical success and low complication rate without general anesthesia. This procedure can be taken into account as a choice of procedure when internal jugular venous access is not possible.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Vena Subclavia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adolescente , Anestesia Local , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Niño , Preescolar , Sedación Consciente , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
J Vasc Access ; 16(5): 431-3, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26109543

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Central venous catheters are often required in oncologic patients for long-term safe administration of chemotherapeutic agents, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition. Rupture of these devices and intracardiac migration is a rare complication. METHODS: We report one spontaneous rupture and embolization of a totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) in an asymptomatic patient. RESULTS: A 50-year-old woman received a TIVAD silicone catheter 8 FR for adjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 years of port time in situ, during a follow-up control, a catheter malfunction was found and radiologic investigations showed a rupture and migration of the catheter to the right ventricle. The attempt to remove the fragment under fluoroscopic control using the femoral route was unsuccessful. We did not try a surgical approach because of the complete absence of symptomatology and hemodynamic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The catheter rupture and intracardiac embolization is a rare complication associated with totally implantable or tunneled central venous catheters. When such an event happens, the patient should be managed by expert hemodynamists or interventional radiologists making an effort to remove the fragment without surgical measures. When the intravascular percutaneous route fails, the possibility to leave the fragmented catheter in heart chambers should be evaluated, being surgery questionable in asymptomatic patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Remoción de Dispositivos , Embolia/terapia , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/terapia , Venas Yugulares , Administración Intravenosa , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Embolia/diagnóstico , Embolia/etiología , Diseño de Equipo , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebografía/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Vasc Access ; 14(4): 379-82, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23817948

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of taurolidine (TauroLockTM) line locks on the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). METHODS: In our unit, any patient with ≥2 CRBSIs in six months is considered for TauroLockTM (2% taurolidine and 4% citrate) line locks. All such patients from May 2007 until January 2012 were identified, along with associated CRBSI rates. CRBSI was defined by differential time to positivity for positive blood cultures. CRBSIs were grouped into pre-taurolidine use and post-taurolidine commencement for each patient and the infection rate per 1000 catheter days calculated. Results were analyzed using Wilcoxon two-sided test. RESULTS: A total of nine patients were included (two men and seven women) with a median age of 51 (range 43-82) years. Infection rates after commencing taurolidine decreased markedly in all patients studied. The median CRBSI rate prior to taurolidine use was 6.39 per 1000 catheter days. This decreased to a median CRBSI rate of 0 per 1000 catheter days after commencing taurolidine. CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine is no substitute for careful aseptic technique. However, it is clearly effective at preventing CRBSIs and should be used in patients with recurrent infections to reduce morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Taurina/análogos & derivados , Tiadiazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/efectos adversos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Taurina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 17(7): 603-6, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22715902

RESUMEN

AIM: Internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization is often required to gain access for haemodialysis. Use of ultrasound guidance has reduced the complication rates of this procedure. We hypothesized that nephrologists may perform IJV cannulation with a high technical success and low immediate complication rates under real-time ultrasound guidance. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 323 patients (186 male, 137 female) who underwent IJV cannulation with real-time ultrasound guidance. The number of needle punctures, technical success, the time between injection of local anaesthetic and entry into the IJV, and immediate complications were recorded. Patients with a history of multiple catheter insertions, previous difficulties during catheterization, poor compliance, obesity, impaired consciousness, skeletal deformity, disorder of haemostasis were regarded as high-risk group. RESULTS: Cannulation of IJV was achieved in all patients. Of the 323 catheters, 125 (38.7%) were placed in high-risk patients. Average number of puncture was 1.26 (range, 1-4). IJV was entered on the first attempt in 261 (80.8%) patients. Only ten complications (10/323, 3.2%) developed; five (2.5%) in the normal-risk group, and five (4.0%) in the high-risk group. Cannulation of IJV took a longer time in the high-risk group than in the normal-risk group. The number of needle punctures, percent of successful cannulation on the first attempt, and the frequency of complications were similar between the high- and normal-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cannulation of IJV under real-time ultrasound guidance is very safe with high technical success rates. Nephrologists can use this technique with ease and with minimal complications in normal- and high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Nefrología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Anestesia Local , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Turquía
18.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 46(5): 410-3, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22617053

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present an alternative technique for management of a type II endoleak associated with aneurysm sac enlargement. TECHNIQUE: We report the use of a transseptal needle-sheath system for a transcatheter transcaval embolization (TTE) in a 3-staged treatment of a persistent type II endoleak after abdominal EVAR. Inferior vena cava is cannulated through a femoral venous access, and aneurysmal sac access is gained with a puncture through the walls of the 2 vessels at the site where the vein is adjacent to the aneurysm. The whole system (sheath-dilator-needle) is then advanced across the vascular walls into the aortic sac. Thus, embolization with glue is performed. CONCLUSION: The TTE using a transseptal needle-sheath system demonstrated to be feasible and effective to treat a persistent type II endoleak after failure of 2 attempts of transarterial embolization of the feeding vessels.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Embolización Terapéutica , Endofuga/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Falla de Prótesis , Vena Cava Inferior , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Enbucrilato/administración & dosificación , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Aceite Yodado/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Agujas , Punciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen
19.
Int J Artif Organs ; 35(7): 520-4, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562373

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In patients with end stage renal disease when there is inability for the creation of a direct arterio-venous fistula or by using a graft, the insertion of a permanent hemodialysis catheter in a central vein ensures the conduction of hemodialysis. We present a technique of placing a permanent catheter in the inferior vena cava through the great saphenous vein without the use of a guide wire. PATIENTS-METHODS: Over the study period, 12 hemodialyzed patients, with a mean age of 73 years, were referred for placement of a dialysis catheter through the great saphenous veins. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia, ECG monitoring, and fluoroscopic control. The insertion of the tunneled hemodialysis catheters was accomplished with ease, through surgical exposure of the great saphenous vein, without the need for a guidewire. RESULTS: The hemodialysis catheter's function was assessed intraoperatively. No intraoperative or immediate post operative complications were noted while during the study period 3 thromboses and an infection were detected (0,95 per 1000 catheter days). The primary catheter patency rates were 92%, 84%, 54% at 30, 90 and 180 days respectively, varying from 28 to 845 days (mean±SD = 294 ± 243,3). CONCLUSION: The introduction of dialysis catheters in the inferior vena cava through the great saphenous vein is technically simple with rare complications and with higher patency rates compared to the traditional femoral approach.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres de Permanencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Vena Safena , Vena Cava Inferior , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Grecia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Vena Safena/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vena Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Enferm. nefrol ; 15(1): 28-38, ene.-mar. 2012. tab, ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-99655

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los Catéteres Venosos Centrales Permanentes Tunelizados para hemodiálisis presentan con frecuencia una complicación denominada efecto ventana o ventosa, en el que la rama arterial se colapsa en las maniobras de aspiración sin ofrecer resistencia al impeler, determinando la inversión de líneas para poder realizar el tratamiento. El estudio se centra en la relación entre la posición anatómica de las puntas del catéter mediante radiografía de tórax y la recirculación medida con Dilución Ultrasónica, el Porcentaje de Reducción de Urea y el Kt/V, determinados tanto con líneas en posición normal e invertida y a flujos de bomba de 250 y 300 ml/min. Material y método: Estudio Cuasiexperimental. Intrasujeto de 18 meses de duración a n=28 catéteres implantados en 25 pacientes en Hemodiálisis. Resultados: • Recirculación: • Líneas normales a 250 y 300 ml/min: 0,85 ± 2,41% y 1,23 ± 3,14%. • Líneas invertidas a 250 y 300 ml/min; 22,41 ± 12,12% y 24,93 ± 12,09%. • Porcentaje de Reducción de Urea: • Líneas normales a 250 y 300 ml/min; 66,49 ± 8,62% y 70,55 ± 5,30%. • Líneas invertidas a 250 y 300 ml/min; 61,05 ± 8,34% y 62,34 ± 8,68%. • Kt/V: • Líneas normales a 250 y 300 ml/min: 1,31 ± 0,30 y 1,46 ± 0,23%. • Líneas invertidas a 250 y 300 ml/min: 1,10 ± 0,21% y 1,19 ± 0,30%. Discusión: Los Porcentajes de Reducción de Urea y Kt/V con líneas invertidas a ambos flujos estudiados, manifiestan dosis de diálisis adecuadas asumiendo recirculaciones entorno al 20% (AU)


Introduction: Permanent tunnelled central venous catheters for haemodialysis frequently present a complication called the section effect, where the arterial branch collapses in the aspiration manoeuvres without offering resistance when pressed, making it necessary to invert the lines in order to carry out the treatment. The study focuses on the relationship between the anatomical position of the catheter tips using a chest X-ray and recirculation measured by Ultrasound Dilution, the Urea Reduction Ratio and Kt/V, determined both with lines in normal and inverted position and at pump flow rates of 250 and 300 ml/min. Material and method: Quasi-experimental intrasubject study with a duration of 18 months on n=28 catheters implanted in 25 patients undergoing Haemodialysis. Results • Recirculation: • Normal lines at 250 and 300 ml/min: 0.85 ± 2.41% and 1.23 ± 3.14%. • Inverted lines at 250 and 300 ml/min; 22.41 ± 12.12% and 24.93 ± 12.09%. • Urea Reduction Ratio: • Normal lines at 250 and 300 ml/min; 66.49 ± 8.62% and 70.55 ± 5.30%. • Inverted lines at 250 and 300 ml/min; 61.05 ± 8.34% and 62.34 ± 8.68%. • Kt/V: • Normal lines at 250 and 300 ml/min: 1.31 ± 0.30 and 1.46 ± 0.23%. • Inverted lines at 250 and 300 ml/min: 1.10 ± 0.21% and 1.19 ± 0.30%. Discussion: The Urea Reduction Ratios and Kt/V with inverted lines at both flow rates studied show suitable dialysis doses assuming recirculation of around 20% (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Radiografía Torácica , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/tendencias , Unidades de Hemodiálisis en Hospital , Recolección de Datos/tendencias , Recolección de Datos , Intervalos de Confianza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA