Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Physiother Res Int ; 23(2): e1700, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29266633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nonpharmacological therapies for tension-type headache (TTH) and cervicogenic cephalalgia are often a treatment choice, despite the weak to moderate evidence. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an acupuncture/stretching protocol versus acupuncture/stretching plus physiotherapy techniques, in patients with TTH cephalalgia. METHODS: A single-blind, prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial was designed considering the pragmatic situation of administering such protocols and treating the 44 headache patients participating in this study. The patients were randomly assigned in 2 treatment groups (control group, n = 20, acupuncture/stretching; experimental group, n = 24, acupuncture/stretching plus physiotherapy) and completed 10 treatment sessions within 4 weeks with measurements taking place before treatment, after the fifth treatment and after the 10th treatment. The mechanical pressure pain threshold (PPT) was considered as the main outcome measure, using a mechanical algometer to measure 7 bilateral somatic points. Acupuncture in both groups included 17-20 acupuncture points, whereas stretching was initially taught and subsequently self-administered (self-stretches), following a standardized set of movements of the cervical spine. Physiotherapy consisted of microwave diathermy and myofascial release with hands-on techniques. RESULTS/FINDINGS: An improvement was noted in both groups/treatments regarding the main outcome measure PPT, all the way from the first to fifth and the 10th treatment, at all measuring sites and at all measurements in both groups (p < .001). When comparing the 2 groups, differences were noted after the 10th treatment (p < .05). DISCUSSION: In conclusion, patients with TTH headache were benefited from acupuncture and stretching but further PPT improvements were evidenced when physiotherapy hands-on techniques were added. In clinical terms, the combination of physiotherapy in the form of myofascial release and microwave diathermy with acupuncture and stretching in order to improve the analgesic effect (PPT) is strongly recommended.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Diatermia/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Masaje/métodos , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/rehabilitación , Umbral del Dolor , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 98(2): 211-219.e2, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623523

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a protocol involving soft tissue techniques and/or neural mobilization techniques in the management of patients with frequent episodic tension-type headache (FETTH) and those with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled before and after trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation area of the local hospital and a private physiotherapy center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=97; 78 women, 19 men) diagnosed with FETTH or CTTH were randomly assigned to groups A, B, C, or D. INTERVENTIONS: (A) Placebo superficial massage; (B) soft tissue techniques; (C) neural mobilization techniques; (D) a combination of soft tissue and neural mobilization techniques. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The pressure pain threshold (PPT) in the temporal muscles (points 1 and 2) and supraorbital region (point 3), the frequency and maximal intensity of pain crisis, and the score in the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) were evaluated. All variables were assessed before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and 15 and 30 days after the intervention. RESULTS: Groups B, C, and D had an increase in PPT and a reduction in frequency, maximal intensity, and HIT-6 values in all time points after the intervention as compared with baseline and group A (P<.001 for all cases). Group D had the highest PPT values and the lowest frequency and HIT-6 values after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The application of soft tissue and neural mobilization techniques to patients with FETTH or CTTH induces significant changes in PPT, the characteristics of pain crisis, and its effect on activities of daily living as compared with the application of these techniques as isolated interventions.


Asunto(s)
Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tratamiento de Tejidos Blandos/métodos , Adulto Joven
3.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 52(5): 606-617, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26989818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Manipulative techniques have shown promising results for relief of tension-type headache (TTH), however prior studies either lacked a control group, or suffered from poor methodological quality. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of spinal manipulation combined with massage versus massage alone on range of motion of the cervical spine, headache frequency, intensity and disability in patients with TTH. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University clinic. POPULATION: We enrolled 105 subjects with TTH. METHODS: Participants were divided into two groups: 1) manipulation and massage; 2) massage only (control). Four treatment sessions were applied over four weeks. The Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and range of upper cervical and cervical motion were evaluated at baseline, immediately after the intervention and at a follow-up, 8 weeks after completing the intervention. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated a large (ƒ=1.22) improvement on their HDI scores. Those that received manipulation reported a medium-sized reduction (ƒ=0.33) in headache frequency across all data points (P<0.05) compared to the control group. Both groups showed a large within-subject effect for upper cervical extension (ƒ=0.62), a medium-sized effect for cervical extension (ƒ=0.39), and large effects for upper cervical (ƒ=1.00) and cervical (ƒ=0.27) flexion. The addition of manipulation resulted in larger gains of upper cervical flexion range of motion, and this difference remained stable at the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the benefit of treating TTH with either massage or massage combined with a manipulative technique. However, the addition of manipulative technique was more effective for increasing range of motion of the upper cervical spine and for reducing the impact of headache. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Although massage provided relief of headache in TTH sufferers, when combined with cervical manipulation, there was a stronger effect on range of upper cervical spine motion.


Asunto(s)
Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Masaje/métodos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Terapia Combinada , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 52(4): 447-56, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26928164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy for the relief of tension-type headache (TTH). However most studies have addressed the impact of therapy on the frequency and intensity of pain. No studies have evaluated the potentially significant effect on the patient's quality of life. AIM: To assess the quality of life of patients suffering from TTH treated for 4 weeks with different manual therapy techniques. DESIGN: Factorial, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Specialized center for the treatment of headache. POPULATION: Seventy-six (62 women) patients aged between 18 and 65 years (age: 39.9±10.9) with either episodic or chronic TTH. METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups: suboccipital inhibitory pressure; suboccipital spinal manipulation; a combination of the two treatments; control. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-12 questionnaire (considering both the overall score and the different dimensions) at the beginning and end of treatment, and after a one month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, the suboccipital inhibition treatment group showed a significant improvement in their overall quality of life at the one month follow-up and also showed specific improvement in the dimensions related to moderate physical activities, and in their emotional role. All the treatment groups, but not the control group, showed improvements in their physical role, bodily pain, and social functioning at the one month follow-up. Post treatment and at the one month follow-up, the combined treatment group showed improved vitality and the two treatment groups that involved manipulation showed improved mental health. CONCLUSIONS: All three treatments were effective at changing different dimensions of quality of life, but the combined treatment showed the most change. The results support the effectiveness of treatments applied to the suboccipital region for patients with TTH. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Manual therapy techniques applied to the suboccipital region, for as little as four weeks, offered a positive improvement in some aspects of quality of life of patient's suffering with TTH.


Asunto(s)
Osteopatía/métodos , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/psicología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 52(4): 457-65, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26745361

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pericranial muscle tenderness shows a remarkable prevalence not only in tension-type headache, but also in migraine, both episodic and chronic. Neck pain is a common disorder and leads to a high rate of work disability; its prevalence increases for headache. AIM: This study aimed at examining the effects of a relaxation exercise programme on pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness in a working community with headache and neck pain. DESIGN: This was a controlled, non-randomized trial. SETTING: The study was carried out in a working community, on the employees of the City of Turin's central and peripheral registry and tax offices. POPULATION: A total of 384 workers were enrolled and divided into two groups: a study group (group 1; 192 subjects) and a control group (group 2; 192 subjects). METHODS: A programme, with relaxation/posture exercises and a visual feedback, was carried out for Group 1 for 6 months and, afterwards, also for group 2 for the same follow-up period throughout. Data on head/neck pain were collected. Standard palpation of pericranial and cervical muscles was done, scoring each patient for Pericranial Muscle Tenderness (PTS) (0-3), Cervical Muscle Tenderness (CTS) (0-3) and a Cumulative Muscle Tenderness (CUM) (0-6). RESULTS: After 6 months from baseline, a significant difference was observed between the groups: i.e. group 1 had an average change from baseline of -0.19 for PTS, -0.2 for CTS and -0.36 for the CUM score - in association with a reduction in headache, neck and shoulder pain. The difference between the groups in PTS, CTS and CUM scores was no longer detectable at the end of the study, after also group 2 performed the programme. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a workplace relaxation exercise intervention significantly decreased pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness in the working community, in association with head-neck pain benefit. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: This relaxation exercise programme was remarkably cost-effective, yielding a relevant benefit on pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness in a working community, at a relatively low cost.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea/rehabilitación , Mialgia/rehabilitación , Dolor de Cuello/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Intervalos de Confianza , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mialgia/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lugar de Trabajo
6.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med ; 50(6): 641-7, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common type of primary headache however there is no clear evidence as to which specific treatment is most effective or whether combined treatment is more effective than individual treatments. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of manual therapy techniques, applied to the suboccipital region, on aspects of disability in a sample of patients with tension-type headache. DESIGN: Randomized Controlled Trial. SETTING: Specialized centre for headache treatment. POPULATION: Seventy-six (62 women) patients (age: 39.9 ± 10.9 years) with episodic chronic TTH. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups: 1) suboccipital soft tissue inhibition; 2) occiput-atlas-axis manipulation; 3) combined treatment of both techniques; 4) control. Four sessions were applied over 4 weeks and disability was assessed before and after treatment using the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Headache frequency, severity and the functional and emotional subscales of the questionnaire were assessed. Photophobia, phonophobia and pericranial tenderness were also monitored. RESULTS: Headache frequency was significantly reduced with the manipulative and combined treatment (P<0.05), and the severity and functional subscale of the HDI changed in all three treatment groups (P<0.05). Manipulation treatment also reduced the score on the emotional subscale of the HDI (P<0.05). The combined intervention showed a greater effect at reducing the overall HDI score compared to the group that received suboccipital soft tissue inhibition and to the control group (both P<0.05). In addition, photophobia, phonophobia and pericranial tenderness only improved in the group receiving combined therapy (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: When given individually, suboccipital soft tissue inhibition and occiput-atlas-axis manipulation resulted in changes in different parameters related to the disability caused by TTH. However, when the two treatments were combined, effectiveness was noted for all aspects of disability and other symptoms including photophobia, phonophobia and pericranial tenderness. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Although individual manual therapy treatments showed a positive change in headache features, measures of photophobia, photophobia and pericranial tenderness only improved in the group that received the combined treatment suggesting that combined treatment is the most appropriate for symptomatic relief of TTH.


Asunto(s)
Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperacusia/etiología , Hiperacusia/rehabilitación , Masculino , Fotofobia/etiología , Fotofobia/rehabilitación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/complicaciones
7.
Rev Neurol ; 57(10): 433-43, 2013 Nov 16.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24203665

RESUMEN

AIM. To analyse the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise on migraines and tension-type headaches (TTH). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Electronic databases were used to search the literature for relevant articles. Eligibility criteria were: controlled randomised clinical trials (RCT), conducted on patients with migraine or TTH, in which the therapeutic intervention was based on therapeutic exercise, and the papers had been published in English and Spanish. Two independent reviewers performed the analysis of the methodological quality using the Delphi scale. RESULTS. Ten RCT were selected, seven of which offered good methodological quality. According to all the studies analysed, the intensity and frequency of pain diminished in comparison to the situation prior to establishing therapeutic exercise, and in five studies the effect was higher than in the control group. The qualitative analysis showed strong evidence of the absence of adverse events following the application of therapeutic exercise. Furthermore, strong evidence was also found of the effect of physiotherapeutic treatment, including therapeutic exercise, in lowering the intensity, frequency and duration of pain in patients with TTH. Limited evidence was also found of the effectiveness of aerobic exercise in patients with migraine, although it was not better than the effects derived from other forms of treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Results show that therapeutic exercise is a safe treatment that provides beneficial effects on migraines or TTH. Further RCT are required in the future with appropriate methodological designs to confirm these results.


TITLE: Ejercicio terapeutico como tratamiento de las migrañas y cefaleas tensionales: revision sistematica de ensayos clinicos aleatorizados.Objetivo. Analizar la efectividad que tiene el ejercicio terapeutico sobre las migrañas y las cefaleas de tipo tensional (CTT). Materiales y metodos. La busqueda de articulos se realizo utilizando bases de datos electronicas. Los criterios de inclusion fueron: estudios clinicos aleatorizados (ECA) controlados, realizados en pacientes con migrañas o CTT, donde la intervencion terapeutica se basara en ejercicio terapeutico y publicados en ingles y español. Dos revisores independientes realizaron el analisis de la calidad metodologica utilizando la escala Delphi. Resultados. Se seleccionaron 10 ECA, de los cuales siete presentaron una calidad metodologica buena. Segun todos los estudios analizados, el ejercicio terapeutico disminuyo la intensidad y frecuencia del dolor comparado con la situacion previa, y en cinco estudios el efecto fue mayor que en la comparativa con el grupo control. El analisis cualitativo muestra evidencia fuerte acerca de la ausencia de eventos adversos tras la aplicacion de ejercicio terapeutico. Ademas, se encontro evidencia fuerte acerca del efecto del tratamiento de fisioterapia, incluyendo el ejercicio terapeutico, para disminuir la intensidad, la frecuencia y la duracion del dolor en pacientes con CTT. Se observo evidencia limitada acerca de la efectividad del ejercicio aerobico sobre los pacientes con migraña sin ser superior el efecto al de otros tratamientos. Conclusiones. Los resultados muestran que el ejercicio terapeutico es un tratamiento seguro, que presenta efectos beneficiosos sobre las migrañas o las CTT. Es necesario que futuros ECA con diseños metodologicos adecuados confirmen estos resultados.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ejercicio con Movimientos , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/terapia , Terapia por Acupuntura , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Fructosa/análogos & derivados , Fructosa/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Trastornos Migrañosos/rehabilitación , Músculos del Cuello/fisiopatología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia por Relajación , Proyectos de Investigación , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/prevención & control , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Topiramato , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 36(7): 403-11, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23845200

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine feasibility of a clinical trial to measure the effects of manual therapy on sternocleidomastoid active trigger points (TrPs) in patients with cervicogenic headache (CeH). METHODS: Twenty patients, 7 males and 13 females (mean ± SD age, 39 ± 13 years), with a clinical diagnosis of CeH and active TrPs in the sternocleidomastoid muscle were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group received TrP therapy (manual pressure applied to taut bands and passive stretching), and the other group received simulated TrP therapy (after TrP localization no additional pressure was added, and inclusion of longitudinal stroking but no additional stretching). The primary outcome was headache intensity (numeric pain scale) based on the headaches experienced in the preceding week. Secondary outcomes included neck pain intensity, cervical range of motion (CROM), pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the upper cervical spine joints and deep cervical flexors motor performance. Outcomes were captured at baseline and 1 week after the treatment. RESULTS: Patients receiving TrP therapy showed greater reduction in headache and neck pain intensity than those receiving the simulation (P < .001). Patients receiving the TrP therapy experienced greater improvements in motor performance of the deep cervical flexors, active CROM, and PPT (all, P < .001) than those receiving the simulation. Between-groups effect sizes were large (all, standardized mean difference, >0.84). CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that a trial of this nature is feasible. The preliminary findings show that manual therapy targeted to active TrPs in the sternocleidomastoid muscle may be effective for reducing headache and neck pain intensity and increasing motor performance of the deep cervical flexors, PPT, and active CROM in individuals with CeH showing active TrPs in this muscle. Studies including greater sample sizes and examining long-term effects are needed.


Asunto(s)
Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas/métodos , Dolor de Cuello/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor , Cefalea Postraumática/rehabilitación , Puntos Disparadores/fisiopatología , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Intervalos de Confianza , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Masaje/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ejercicios de Estiramiento Muscular/métodos , Músculos del Cuello/fisiopatología , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Proyectos Piloto , Cefalea Postraumática/diagnóstico , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/fisiopatología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
BMC Neurol ; 12: 82, 2012 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22920541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine the differences of precipitating and relieving factors between migraine and tension type headache. METHODS: This is a cross sectional study. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 250 migraine patients and 250 patients diagnosed as tension type headache from the specialized headache clinic in Dept. of Neurology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Data were collected through a predesigned questionnaire containing information on age, sex, social status and a predetermined list of precipitating and relieving factors. RESULTS: In this study, the female patients predominated (67%). Most of the patients were within 21-30 years age group (58.6%). About 58% of them belonged to middle class families. The common precipitating factors like stress, anxiety, activity, journey, reading, cold and warm were well distributed among both the migraine and tension type headache (TTH) patients. But significant difference was demonstrated for fatigue (p < 0.05), sleep deprivation (p < 0.05), sunlight (p < 0.01) and food (p < 0.05), which were common among migraineurs. In consideration of relieving factors of pain, different maneuvers were commonly tried by migraineurs and significant difference were observed for both analgesic drug and massage (p < 0.05), which relieved migraine headache. But maneuvers like sleep, rest and posture were used by both groups. CONCLUSION: The most frequent precipitating factors for headache appear to be identical for both migraine and TTH patients. Even though some factors like fatigue, sleep deprivation, sunlight and food significantly precipitate migraine and drug, massage are effective maneuver for relieving pain among migrianeurs.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga/epidemiología , Masaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/rehabilitación , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Fatiga/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
10.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 30(4): 333-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22672949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger points' management by Positional Release Therapy (PRT) and routine medical therapy in treatment of Tension Type Headache. BACKGROUND: Tension Type Headache is the most frequent headache with the basis of myofascial and trigger point disorders. PRT is an indirect technique that treats trigger points. METHOD: 30 Patients with active trigger points in cervical muscles entered to the study. They were randomly assigned to PRT or medical therapy group. Headache frequency, intensity and duration and tablet count were recorded by use of a daily headache diary. Sensitivity of trigger points was assessed by numeric pain intensity and by use of a digital force gauge (FG 5020). RESULTS: Both groups showed significant reduction in headache frequency and duration and tablet count after treatment phase. However, the reduction of study variables was persisted only in PRT group after follow up phase. There was no significant reduction in headache intensity, neither in PRT and nor in medication group. Sensitivity of trigger points was significantly reduced. In comparison of the two study groups, there was no significant difference in headache frequency, intensity, duration and tablet count (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both procedures were equally effective according to the study. Thus, PRT can be a treatment choice for patients with T.T.H.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Puntos Disparadores/fisiología , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Man Ther ; 17(5): 456-8, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22561484

RESUMEN

Tension Type Headache (T.T.H) is the most prevalent headache. Myofascial abnormalities & trigger points are important in this type of headache which can be managed by Positional Release Therapy (PRT). This is a report of a 47 years old female patient with Tension Type Headache treated by Positional Release Therapy for her trigger points. She had a constant dull headache, which continued all the day for 9 months. A physiotherapist evaluated the patient and found active trigger points in her cervical muscles. Then, she received Positional Release Therapy for her trigger points. After 3 treatment sessions, the patient's headache stopped completely. During the 8 months following the treatment she was without pain, and did not use any medication. Positional Release Therapy was effective in treating Tension Type Headache. This suggests that PRT could be an alternative treatment to medication in patients with T.T.H if the effectiveness of that can be confirmed by further studies.


Asunto(s)
Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Puntos Disparadores/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Eur. J. Ost. Clin. Rel. Res ; 7(1): 10-21, ene.-abr. 2012. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-103593

RESUMEN

Introducción: La cefalea tensional tiene una elevada prevalencia, con repercusión en el ámbito laboral y social de los sujetos que la padecen. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de varias intervenciones con terapia osteopática en pacientes con cefalea tensional. Material y Métodos: Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio a doble ciego, aleatorio, con 76 pacientes (81,6% mujeres) diagnosticados de cefalea tensional (edad media 39,9±10,9 años), distribuidos en cuatro grupos de estudio, integrados por 19 pacientes cada uno de ellos (tres grupos experimentales y un grupo de control). Los tratamientos aplicados a los grupos experimentales incluyen terapia osteopática con: 1) técnica de inhibición de suboccipitales (IS); 2) técnica manipulativa de occipucio-atlas-axis (OAA); 3) la combinación de ambas (IS+OAA). Se aplicaron 4 sesiones, (1 por semana), y seguimiento a los 30 días. Se evaluó antes, después del tratamiento y en el seguimiento, la movilidad cervical, el impacto producido por el dolor y la frecuencia e intensidad del dolor. Resultados: El grupo IS mejoró significativamente en el impacto del dolor (p=0,02). Los grupos OAA y IS+OAA, mejoraron en impacto e intensidad del dolor (p<0,001 a p=0,05), y en flexión y extensión suboccipital (p<0,001 a p=0,04). El grupo OAA mejoró también en las rotaciones cervicales (p=0,008 a p=0,007). El grupo IS+OAA obtuvo resultados significativos en la frecuencia e intensidad del dolor (p<0,001 a p=0,05). Conclusiones: Los tres tratamientos aplicados son eficaces en el impacto del dolor y en la intensidad del dolor. El tratamiento OAA es el más eficaz en la ganancia de la movilidad cervical, seguido del tratamiento IS. El tratamiento combinado IS+OAA, resulta más eficaz en la reducción de la frecuencia e intensidad del dolor (AU)


Introduction: The tension-type headache is extremely common, and has repercussions in both the work environment and the social life of the people who suffer from them. Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency of two manual therapy treatments in patients with tension-type headaches. Material and Methods: A random, double-blind trial was undertaken, with seventy-six (n=76) patients (81.6% women) diagnosed with tension-type headache (39.9 ± 10.9 years), distributed in four groups (n=19 each one), three experimental groups and one control group (without intervention). Interventions in experimental groups included osteopathic manual therapy with: 1) Suboccipital soft tissue Inhibition Technique (SIT); 2) Occiput-Atlas-Axis global manipulation (OAA); 3) The combination of both (SIT+OAA). Treatments were applied during four sessions (one per week), with follow-up at 30 days. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment and during follow-up, by monitoring cervical mobility, the impact of pain and the frequency and intensity of the headache. Results: The SIT group significantly improved the impact of the pain (p=0.02). The OAA group and the SIT+OAA group, improved the headache impact and intensity (p<0.001 to p=0.05), and suboccipital flexion and extension (p<0.001 to p=0.04). The OAA group also improved cervical rotations (p=0.008 to p=0.007). The SIT+OAA group obtained significant results in the frequency and intensity of the pain (p<0.001 to p=0.05). Conclusions: The three treatments applied were effective in the impact of headache and in pain intensity. The OAA treatment is the most effective in increasing cervical mobility, followed by the SIT treatment. The combined treatment SIT +OAA was the most effective in reducing the frequency and the intensity of the pain caused by tension-type headache(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/terapia , Osteopatía/métodos , Osteopatía/tendencias , Cefalea/epidemiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Osteopatía , Articulación Atlantooccipital/fisiopatología , Análisis de Varianza , Calidad de Vida
13.
Headache ; 52(5): 785-91, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22188357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although both pharmacological and behavioral interventions may relieve tension-type headache, data are lacking regarding treatment preference, long-term patient compliance, and feasibility of behavioral intervention in a standard neurological outpatient clinic setting. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient choice, long-term compliance, and clinical outcome in a neurological clinic setting where patients are given the choice of the approach they wish to pursue. DESIGN: Patients presenting to the headache clinic with a diagnosis of tension-type headache that justified prophylactic therapy (frequent episodic tension-type headache or chronic tension-type headache) were given the choice of amitriptyline (AMT) treatment or hypnotic relaxation (HR), and were treated accordingly. Patients were given the option to cross-over to the other treatment group at each visit. HR was performed during standard length neurology clinic appointments by a neurologist trained to perform hypnosis (Y.E.). Follow-up interviews were performed between 6 and 12 months following treatment initiation to evaluate patient compliance, changes in headache frequency or severity, and quality-of-life parameters. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled, 92 agreed to receive prophylactic therapy of some kind. Fifty-three (57.6%) patients chose HR of which 36 (67.9%) actually initiated this treatment, while 39 (42.4%) chose pharmacological therapy with AMT of which 25 (64.1%) patients actually initiated therapy. Patients with greater analgesic use were more likely to opt for AMT (P= .0002). Eleven of the patients initially choosing AMT and 2 of the patients initially choosing HR crossed over to the other group. Seventy-four percent of the patients in the HR group and 58% of patients in the AMT group had a 50% reduction in the frequency of headaches (P= .16). Long-term adherence to treatment with HR exceeded that of AMT. At the end of the study period, 26 of 47 patients who tried HR compared with 10 of 27 who tried AMT continued receiving their initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HR treatment was a more popular choice among patients. Patients choosing HR reported greater symptom relief than those choosing AMT and were found to have greater treatment compliance. Patients receiving HR were less likely to change treatments. HR practiced by a neurologist is feasible in a standard neurological outpatient clinic setting; HR training should be considered for neurologists involved in headache treatment.


Asunto(s)
Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Conducta de Elección , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/psicología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 32(7): 527-35, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19748404

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of head-neck massage on heart rate variability (HRV), mood states, and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in patients with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). METHODS: Eleven patients (8 females), between 20 and 68 years old, with CTTH participated in this crossover study. Patients received either the experimental treatment (massage protocol) or a placebo intervention (detuned ultrasound). Holter electrocardiogram recordings (standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval, square root of mean squared differences of successive NN intervals, index HRV, low-frequency component, and high-frequency component), PPT over both temporalis muscles, and Profile of Mood States questionnaire (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor, fatigue, confusion) were obtained preintervention, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours postintervention. Self-reported head pain was also collected preintervention and 24 hours postintervention. Separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were performed with each dependent variable. The hypothesis of interest was group x time interaction. RESULTS: The ANCOVA showed a significant group x time interaction for index HRV (F = 4.5, P = .04), but not for standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (F = 1.1, P = .3), square root of mean squared differences of successive NN intervals (F = 0.9, P = .3), low-frequency component (F = 0.03, P = .8), or high-frequency component (F = 0.4, P = .5) domains. Pairwise comparisons found that after the manual therapy intervention, patients showed an increase in the index HRV (P = .01) domain, whereas no changes were found after the placebo intervention (P = .7). The ANCOVA also found a significant group x time interaction for tension-anxiety (F = 5.3, P = .03) and anger-hostility (F = 4.6, P = .04) subscales. Pairwise comparisons found that after the manual therapy intervention, patients showed a decrease in tension-anxiety (P = .002) and anger-hostility (P = .04) subscales, whereas no changes were found after the placebo intervention (P > .5 both subscales). No significant changes were found in PPT levels (right F = 0.3, P = .6, left F = 0.4, P = .5). A significant group x time interaction for pain (F = 4.8, P = .04) was identified. No influence of sex was found (F = 1.5, P = .3). Pairwise comparisons showed that head pain (numerical pain rating scale) decreased 24 hours after manual therapy (P < .05) but not after the placebo intervention (P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a single session of manual therapy program produces an immediate increase of index HRV and a decrease in tension, anger status, and perceived pain in patients with CTTH.


Asunto(s)
Afecto/fisiología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Masaje/métodos , Umbral del Dolor/fisiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Adulto , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Cruzados , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Probabilidad , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Pain ; 112(3): 381-388, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15561394

RESUMEN

The study design is a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The objectives of the present study are to assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation in patients with tension-type headache (TTH). No systematic review exists concerning the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation primarily focussing on TTH. Literature was searched using a computerised search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Only RCTs including physiotherapy and/or (spinal) manipulation used in the treatment of TTH in adults were selected. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs using the Delphi-list. A study was considered of high quality if it satisfied at least six points on the methodological quality list. Twelve publications met the inclusion criteria, including three dual or overlapping publications resulting in eight studies included. These studies showed a large variety of interventions, such as chiropractic spinal manipulation, connective tissue manipulation or physiotherapy. Only two studies were considered to be of high quality, but showed inconsistent results. Because of clinical heterogeneity and poor methodological quality in many studies, it appeared to be not possible to draw valid conclusions. Therefore, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to either support or refute the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation in patients with TTH.


Asunto(s)
Especialidad de Fisioterapia/métodos , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/rehabilitación , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas , Femenino , Humanos , MEDLINE/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA