Antibiotic therapy for nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli infections: future perspectives.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Serious infections caused by nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) pose a significant challenge for clinicians due to the limited treatment options available, which are frequently associated with issues of toxicity and unfavourable pharmacokinetic profiles. The aim of this review is to provide a brief overview of the existing data concerning the ongoing development of antiinfective agents targeting NF-GNB. RECENT FINDINGS: Several agents exhibiting efficacy against NF-GNB are under clinical investigation. Durlobactam-sulbactam and cefepime-taniborbactam emerge as promising therapeutic avenues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii . Cefepime-zidebactam may serve as a suitable treatment option for urinary tract infections caused by a wide range of NF-GNB. Cefepime-enmetazobactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity against various NF-GNB strains; however, its role as an anti- Pseudomonal agent is inadequately substantiated by available data. Xeruborbactam is a wide ß-lactamase inhibitor that can be associated with a range of agents, enhancing in-vitro activity of these against many NF-GNB, including those resistant to newer, broader spectrum options. Lastly, murepavadin appears to be a potential pathogen-specific solution for severe Pseudomonas infections; however, additional investigation is necessary to establish the safety profile of this compound. SUMMARY: Each of the novel molecules reviewed possesses an interesting range of in-vitro activity against NF-GNB. In addition, some of them have already been proved effective in vivo, underscoring their potential as future treatment options.

Compassionate use of a novel ß-lactam enhancer-based investigational antibiotic cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) for the treatment of extensively-drug-resistant NDM-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient: a case report.

Infections in critically-ill patients caused by extensively-drug-resistant (XDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa are challenging to manage due to paucity of effective treatment options. Cefepime/zidebactam, which is currently in global Phase 3 clinical development (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04979806, registered on July 28, 2021) is a novel mechanism of action based ß-lactam/ ß-lactam-enhancer combination with a promising activity against a broad-range of Gram-negative pathogens including XDR P. aeruginosa. We present a case report of an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient infected with XDR P. aeruginosa and successfully treated with cefepime/zidebactam under compassionate use. The 50 year old female patient with past-history of bariatric surgery and recent elective abdominoplasty and liposuction developed secondary pneumonia and failed a prolonged course of polymyxins. The organism repeatedly isolated from the patient was a New-Delhi metallo ß-lactamase-producing XDR P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. As polymyxins failed to rescue the patient, cefepime/zidebactam was administered under compassionate grounds leading to discharge of patient in stable condition. The present case highlights the prevailing precarious scenario of antimicrobial resistance and the need for novel antibiotics to tackle infections caused by XDR phenotype pathogens.

Cefepime vs carbapenems for treating third-generation cephalosporin-resistant AmpC ß-lactamase-hyperproducing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: a multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: AmpC ß-lactamase-hyperproducing Enterobacterales (ABLHE) bloodstream infections (BSI) are emerging and leading to therapeutic challenges worldwide. Prescriptions of carbapenems may lead to the emergence of resistance. This study aimed to compare cefepime with carbapenems for the treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant ABLHE BSI. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with ABLHE BSI from two tertiary hospitals in France, between July 2017 and July 2022. Non-AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales were excluded. Cefepime was prescribed only in case of minimal inhibitory concentration ≤1 mg/l. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality from the date of index blood culture. Secondary outcomes were infection recurrence and treatment toxicity. An inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 164 BSI, which included 77 in the cefepime group and 87 in the carbapenem group. In the weighted cohort, the 30-day mortality rates were similar between the cefepime group (23.3%) and the carbapenem group (19.6%) with a relative risk of 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-2.33 P = 0.614). No significant difference in recurrence or toxicity was found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study adds evidence in favor of the use of cefepime for treating third-generation cephalosporin-resistant ABLHE BSI in case of minimal inhibitory concentration ≤ 1 mg/l, which could spare carbapenems.

Model for Evaluating Antimicrobial Therapy To Prevent Life-Threatening Bacterial Infections following Exposure to a Medically Significant Radiation Dose.

More evidence is needed to support recommendations for medical management of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and associated infections resulting from a radiological/nuclear event. While current guidelines recommend the administration of antibiotics to chemotherapy patients with febrile neutropenia, the clinical benefit is unclear for acute radiation injury patients. A well-characterized nonhuman primate (NHP) model of hematopoietic ARS was developed that incorporates supportive care postirradiation. This model evaluated the efficacy of myeloid growth factors within 24 to 48 h after total body irradiation (TBI). However, in this model, NHPs continued to develop life-threatening bacterial infections, even when granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was administered in combination with antibiotic monotherapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of combination antibiotic therapies administered to NHPs following 7.4-Gy TBI to understand the occurrence of bacterial infection in NHPs with hematopoietic ARS. We compared enrofloxacin-linezolid, enrofloxacin-cefepime, and enrofloxacin-ertapenem to enrofloxacin monotherapy. The primary endpoint was 60-day postirradiation mortality, with secondary endpoints of overall survival time, incidence of bacterial infection, and bacteriologic culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We observed that enrofloxacin-ertapenem significantly increased survival compared to enrofloxacin monotherapy. Bacteria isolated from nonsurviving macaques with systemic bacterial infections exhibited uniform resistance to enrofloxacin and variable resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, gentamicin, and azithromycin. Multidrug antibiotic resistance was observed in Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli. We conclude that antibiotic combination therapies appear to be more effective than monotherapy alone but acknowledge that more work is needed to identify an optimal antimicrobial therapy.

Clinical impact of cefepime breakpoint in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia.

The application of cefepime breakpoint for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteraemia has not been explored. Adult cases of monomicrobial bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by cefepime-susceptible [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L] K. pneumoniae isolates with carbapenem resistance between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients treated with cefepime were compared with those treated by other active agents using a propensity score-matched analysis to assess therapeutic effectiveness. The primary endpoint was 30-day crude mortality. A total of 114 patients experienced cefepime-susceptible CRKP bacteraemia and 40 (35.1%) died during hospitalisation. A total of 33 patients (28.9%) received cefepime therapy. Fifteen patients (13.2%) had BSI due to carbapenemase-producing isolates, and 86.7% (13/15) of carbapenemase-producing isolates were classified as cefepime susceptible dose-dependent (SDD). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, 30-day mortality was independently associated with the presence of a critical illness [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 12.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.88-42.83; P < 0.001], pneumonia (aOR = 5.97, 95% CI 1.65-21.76; P = 0.007) and rapidly fatal underlying disease (aOR = 6.43, 95% CI 1.30-31.09; P = 0.02). In contrast, cefepime-based therapy (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.003-0.38; P = 0.006) and combination therapy (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.36; P = 0.001) were protective against a fatal outcome. Based on current breakpoints for Enterobacterales, cefepime therapy was not associated with an unfavourable outcome for CRKP BSI with MIC-based dosing strategies. However, the susceptibility result of SDD to cefepime should alert clinicians for possible therapeutic failure.

Efficacy of human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposures of cefepime, zidebactam and the combination (WCK 5222) against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neutropenic murine pneumonia model.

OBJECTIVES: WCK 5222 combines cefepime with zidebactam, a ß-lactam enhancer that binds PBP2 and inhibits class A and C ß-lactamases. The efficacy of human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposures of WCK 5222 against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa was investigated in a neutropenic murine pneumonia model. METHODS: Nineteen MDR isolates of P. aeruginosa (cefepime MICs ≥64 mg/L) were studied. MICs of zidebactam and WCK 5222 ranged from 4 to 512 mg/L and from 4 to 32 mg/L, respectively. Dosing regimens of cefepime and zidebactam alone and in combination that achieved epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures in mice approximating human ELF exposures after doses of 2 g of cefepime/1 g of zidebactam every 8 h (1 h infusion) were utilized; controls were vehicle-dosed. Lungs were intranasally inoculated with 107-108 cfu/mL bacterial suspensions. Mice were dosed subcutaneously 2 h after inoculation for 24 h, then lungs were harvested. RESULTS: In vitro MIC was predictive of in vivo response to WCK 5222 treatment. Mean±SD changes in bacterial density at 24 h compared with 0 h controls (6.72±0.50 log10 cfu/lungs) for 13 isolates with WCK 5222 MICs ≤16 mg/L were 1.17±1.00, -0.99±1.45 and -2.21±0.79 log10 cfu/lungs for cefepime, zidebactam and WCK 5222, respectively. Against these isolates, zidebactam yielded >1 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 8/13, while activity was enhanced with WCK 5222, producing >2 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 10/13 and >1 log10 cfu/lungs reductions in 12/13. Among isolates with WCK 5222 MICs of 32 mg/L, five out of six showed a bacteriostatic response. CONCLUSIONS: Human-simulated bronchopulmonary exposure of WCK 5222 is effective against MDR P. aeruginosa at MIC ≤16 mg/L in a murine pneumonia model. These data support the clinical development of WCK 5222 for pseudomonal lung infections.

Evolving Antibiotic Resistance of Aeromonas Species in Finger Replantation.

Background: Infections with Aeromonas spp. are a recognized complication of leech therapy for circulatory complications in replanted digits. Ciprofloxacin is commonly used empirically for Aeromonas coverage in such cases. Evolving resistance patterns of Aeromonas should be considered in designing an antibiotic strategy. Methods: Three consecutive patients with complicated replantations had site cultures yielding Aeromonas isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin. These cultures were analyzed to identify effective antibiotic agents. Results: Each Aeromonas isolate, and each additional site organism, was sensitive to cefepime. Conclusion: Our routine antibiotic coverage for leech application has been changed to cefepime. Aeromonas sensitivities and resistances should be monitored to adapt to future changes in appropriate antibiotics.

Risk factors and survival of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a KPC endemic setting: a case-control and cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Many gaps in the burden of resistant pathogens exist in endemic areas of low- and middle-income economies, especially those endemic for carbapenem resistance. The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors for carbapenem-resistance, to estimate the association between carbapenem-resistance and all-cause 30-day mortality and to examine whether mortality is mediated by inappropriate therapy. METHODS: A case-control and a cohort study were conducted in one tertiary-care hospital in Medellín, Colombia from 2014 to 2015. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of isolates was performed. In the case-control study, cases were defined as patients infected with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) and controls as patients infected with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CSKP). A risk factor analysis was conducted using logistic regression models. In the cohort study, the exposed group was defined as patients infected with CRKP and the non-exposed group as patients infected with CSKP. A survival analysis using an accelerated failure time model with a lognormal distribution was performed to estimate the association between carbapenem resistance and all-cause 30-day-mortality and to examine whether mortality is mediated by inappropriate therapy. RESULTS: A total of 338 patients were enrolled; 49 were infected with CRKP and 289 with CSKP. Among CRKP isolates CG258 (n = 29), ST25 (n = 5) and ST307 (n = 4) were detected. Of importance, every day of meropenem (OR 1.18, 95%CI 1.10-1.28) and cefepime (OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.03-1.49) use increase the risk of carbapenem resistance. Additional risk factors were previous use of ciprofloxacin (OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.00-5.35) and urinary catheter (OR 2.60, 95%CI 1.25-5.37). Furthermore, a significant lower survival time was estimated for patients infected with CRKP compared to CSKP (Relative Times 0.44, 95%CI 0.24-0.82). The strength of association was reduced when appropriate therapy was included in the model (RT = 0.81 95%CI 0.48-1.37). CONCLUSION: Short antibiotic courses had the potential to reduce the selection and transmission of CRKP. A high burden in mortality occurred in patients infected with CRKP in a KPC endemic setting and CRKP leads to increased mortality via inappropriate antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, dissemination of recognized hypervirulent clones could add to the list of challenges for antibiotic resistance control.

In Vivo Efficacy of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model.

We describe the in vivo efficacy of human-simulated WCK 5222 (cefepime-zidebactam) exposure against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (meropenem MICs 8 to >256 µg/ml) in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. WCK 5222 MICs ranged from 4 to 32 µg/ml. Substantial in vivo WCK 5222 activity was observed against all isolates, further enhancing the efficacy of zidebactam alone in 11/16 isolates (WCK 5222 mean reduction, -1.62 ± 0.58 log10 CFU/thigh), and a lack of activity was observed with cefepime monotherapy.

Adequacy of empiric gram-negative coverage for septic patients at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative organisms (GNOs) have increasing resistance rates to levofloxacin at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS), where levofloxacin is the most common agent added to provide double coverage of gram-negative infections. The goal of this study was to determine the adequacy of empiric gram-negative coverage for septic patients at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted to VCUHS, from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, with a diagnosis of sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock and documented infection, was performed to determine the adequacy of various empiric antibiotic combinations. RESULTS: Of 219 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 56% of patients received monotherapy and 21% of patients received combination therapy (2 antibiotics) covering GNOs. GNOs (84%) were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. When used in combination with cefepime and meropenem, levofloxacin did not increase coverage. However, levofloxacin provided an 8% increase in coverage and gentamicin provided an additional 13% increase in coverage, respectively, when used in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: Among septic patients at VCUHS, gentamicin provided increased gram-negative coverage when compared with levofloxacin. Although susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam alone was relatively low, the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and gentamicin provided nearly equivalent coverage to meropenem and gentamicin.

Bloodstream infections in hospitalized adults with dengue fever: Clinical characteristics and recommended empirical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dengue is an important mosquito-borne tropical viral disease and dual infection, though rare, has been regarded as a risk factor for severe disease and mortality. However, few studies focused on bloodstream infections (BSIs) and empirical antibiotic therapy rarely addressed. METHODS: Dengue patients with concurrent or subsequent BSIs between July 1 and December 31, 2015 were included. Clinical information, laboratory data, and drug susceptibility data were collected. RESULTS: Totally 80 patients, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 32.5%, were included and categorized into three groups. 32 patients in Group I (BSI onset within 48 h after admission), 32 in Group II (between 48 h and one week), and 16 in Group III (more than one week). Patients in Group I were older (mean age: 75.6 vs. 72.6 or 69.6 years; P = 0.01) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (3.1 vs. 1.8 or 1.9; P = 0.02) than those in Group II or III. Streptococcus species (28.9%, 11/38) and Escherichia coli (23.7%, 9/38) were major pathogens in Group I. Enterobacteriaceae (38.2%, 13/34) isolates predominated in Group II. Fatal patients more often received inappropriate empirical antibiotic than the survivors (61.5% vs. 35.2%; P = 0.03). According to susceptibility data, pathogens in Group I and II shared similar susceptibility profiles, and levofloxacin, cefepime, or piperacillin/tazobactam, can be empirically prescribed for those hospitalized within one week. CONCLUSIONS: BSI pathogens vary among dengue patients. For adults with dengue and suspected BSI hospitalized within one week, empirical antimicrobial agents are recommended.

Assessing antimicrobial stewardship initiatives: Clinical evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with bloodstream infections secondary to AmpC-producing organisms.

Management of micro-organisms harbouring AmpC ß-lactamases remains challenging. Carbapenems are often considered first-line agents. Due to growing concern regarding carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, integrating non-carbapenem treatment strategies is being explored for these pathogens. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with bacteraemia secondary to AmpC-producing organisms treated with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP). A retrospective study of adult patients receiving cefepime or TZP for the treatment of AmpC -producing organisms with positive cefoxitin screen (i.e. Citrobacter, Enterobacter or Serratia spp. along with cefoxitin resistance) isolated from blood cultures was conducted. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at end of therapy (EOT). Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication, frequency of susceptibility changes following treatment, and 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality. Clinical cure at EOT was 87.1%, with 93.2% of patients achieving microbiological eradication. The 7- and 30-day mortality rates were 3.8% and 10.6%, respectively. Organism susceptibility was exceptionally high, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≤2 µg/mL in 90% of patients treated with cefepime (n = 108). Selection for resistance to third-generation cephalosporins or primary antimicrobial therapy was infrequent at 6.1% (8/132). In conclusion, use of cefepime or TZP for management of AmpC bloodstream infections was associated with clinical and microbiological cure with infrequent selection for resistance.

Activity of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected from Respiratory Tract Specimens of Hospitalized Patients in the United States during 2013 to 2015.

The activities of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparator agents against organisms deemed to be the cause of pneumonia among patients hospitalized in the United States during 2013 to 2015 were evaluated. Organisms included 1,576 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2,362 Enterobacteriaceae isolates susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution methods. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited 96.3%, 84.8%, 83.5%, 80.0%, and 78.6%, respectively, of the P. aeruginosa isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 77.5 to 85.1% of isolates nonsusceptible to antipseudomonal ß-lactams and 86.6% and 71.0% of the 372 (23.6% overall) multidrug- and 155 (9.8%) extensively drug-resistant isolates tested. The activity of this combination was greater than those of other ß-lactams evaluated against P. aeruginosa groups across all U.S. census divisions. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was active against 90.6% of the Enterobacteriaceae, being less active than only meropenem (95.6% susceptible) among the ß-lactams evaluated. Against 145 Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates carrying extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-encoding genes without carbapenemases, ceftolozane-tazobactam inhibited 82.8% of these isolates and was more active than cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam (15.2% and 74.3% susceptible, respectively). ESBL genes included in this analysis were mainly blaCTX-M-15-like (89 isolates) and blaCTX-M-14-like (22) genes but also blaSHV (31) and blaTEM (3). Ceftolozane-tazobactam also displayed activity (84.6% susceptible) against 13 isolates harboring acquired AmpC genes. All ß-lactams displayed limited activity against blaKPC-carrying isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam tested against P. aeruginosa isolates from isolates that were the probable cause of pneumonia and displayed in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae, including isolates resistant to cephalosporins and carrying ESBL genes.