Observation on Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with cefoxitin sodium after cesarean section.

This paper aims to observe the effect of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection combined with cefoxitin sodium after cesarean section. Clinical data of 126 puerperae were retrospectively analyzed. They randomized into control group and treatment group, and there were 63 cases in each group. Patients in control group were given Cefoxitin Sodium treatment. And patients in treatment group were given Shenqi Fuzheng Injection on the basis of control group. After 7 days of treatment, the clinical curative effect of the two groups was observed and compared. The body temperature of the patients in treatment group was significantly decreased when compared with control group on the 2nd and 3rd day after operation (P<0.05); the first exhaust time and defecation time of patients in treatment group were significantly shortened when compared with control group (P<0.05); the postoperative hemoglobin and red blood cell count in both groups were all significantly increased when compared with before treatment (P<0.05), and the treatment group were evidently higher than control group (P<0.05); the postoperative neutrophilic granulocyte percentage, white blood cell count and lymphocytes percentage in both groups were all significantly lowered when compared with before treatment (P<0.05), and the neutrophilic granulocyte percentage, white blood cell count and lymphocytes percentage in treatment group were significantly lowered when compared with control group (P<0.05). Shenqi Fuzheng injection combined with cefoxitin sodium after cesarean section can effectively reduce the postoperative maternal body temperature and promote the recovery of maternal gastrointestinal function, which is conducive to the repair of uterus, further correct anemia after cesarean section and prevent postpartum infection. Its clinical curative effect is ideal, with certain clinical application value.

Antibiotic treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease: a retrospective analysis of 65 patients.

RATIONALE: The optimal therapeutic regimen and duration of treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease is not well established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a standardized combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of M. abscessus lung disease. METHODS: Sixty-five patients (11 males, 55 females, median age 55 yr) with M. abscessus lung disease were treated with clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and doxycycline, together with an initial regimen of amikacin and cefoxitin for the first 4 weeks of hospitalization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Treatment response rates were 83% for symptoms and 74% for high-resolution computed tomography. Sputum conversion and maintenance of negative sputum cultures for more than 12 months was achieved in 38 (58%) patients. These rates were significantly lower in patients whose isolates were resistant to clarithromycin (17%, 2/12) compared with those whose isolates were susceptible or intermediate to clarithromycin (64%, 21/33; P = 0.007). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia associated with cefoxitin developed in 33 (51%) and 4 (6%) patients, respectively. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity occurred in 10 (15%) patients. Because of these adverse reactions, cefoxitin was discontinued in 39 (60%) patients after treatment for a median of 22 days. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized combination antibiotic therapy was moderately effective in treating M. abscessus lung disease. However, frequent adverse reactions and the potential for long-duration hospitalization are important problems that remain to be solved.

[Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole vs. cefoxitin/doxycycline: comparison of two therapy schedules for treatment of acute pelvic infection]. / Ciprofloxacin/Metronidazol vs. Cefoxitin/Doxycyclin: Vergleich zweier Therapieschemata zur Behandlung der akuten pelvinen Infektion.

The efficacy and safety of two antibiotic regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) was compared in a prospective and randomised study. 57 patients received either 0.2 gms ciprofloxacin intravenously b.i.d. in combination with 0.5 g metronidazole intravenously t.i.d. (n = 26), or alternatively 2 g cefoxitin intravenously t.i.d. in combination with doxycycline 0.1 g b.i.d. (n = 31). After commencing therapy intravenously, medication with ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and doxycycline was continued orally after two or three days. In the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole group, PID was found to be severe in 7, moderate in 12 and mild in 7 patients. The numbers in the cefoxitin/doxycycline group were 8, 20 and 3 respectively. The clinical result after treatment with ciprofloxacin/metronidazole was resolution of all symptoms in 24 patients and improvement in 2 others. In the cefoxitin/doxycycline treated group, resolution was found in 27 patients, improvement in 2 others. Failure occurred in 2 patients. 53 different microorganisms as the suspected cause of PID were isolated in the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole group and 56 in the cefoxitin/doxycycline group. According to our clinical and bacteriological criteria, treatment for PID was successful in 97% of the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole group and in 87% of the cefoxitin/doxycycline group. Adverse reactions were found in 4 patients in the ciprofloxacin/metronidazole treated group. Therapy had to be terminated in 3 of these patients. In the cefoxitin/doxycycline group 2 patients had adverse reactions, and therapy had to be terminated in one of these patients. According to our results, both antibiotic regimens can be recommended for the treatment of PID.

Therapeutic interchange of ampicillin-sulbactam for cefoxitin.

A therapeutic interchange program based on microbial patterns within an institution is described. A change in anaerobic susceptibility patterns, increased prevalence of enterococcal infections, and cost factors provided the rationale for the therapeutic interchange of ampicillin-sulbactam for cefoxitin. Ampicillin-sulbactam was recommended for prophylaxis in intraabdominal or gynecological surgery as well as for treatment for gynecological infections. Cefoxitin was restricted to penicillin-allergic patients and women who were pregnant or breast-feeding. The transition from cefoxitin to ampicillin-sulbactam proceeded smoothly as a result of preliminary education of pharmacists and physicians. Pharmacists participated in continuing-education programs and received concise guidelines for the interchange and follow-up instructions; physicians learned of the program from the drug newsletter published by the pharmacy department. Three months after the program began, only one physician was resistant to the interchange. After the program began, 11 antimicrobials, including cefoxitin, were used less frequently and ampicillin-sulbactam use increased. No adverse clinical consequences from the interchange were detected. A therapeutic interchange program based on institution-specific microbial patterns and educational efforts by the pharmacy department produced a change in physician prescribing.

Sulbactam/ampicillin in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

Acute pelvic inflammatory disease is associated with significant adverse reproductive sequelae. To prevent these serious sequelae, treatment regimens must cover the major etiologic agents which are Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and mixed anaerobic-aerobic bacteria. This report concerns the prospective evaluation of the efficacy of the combination of sulbactam with ampicillin in patients hospitalized with acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Clinical cure was noted in 33 (94%) of 35 patients and post-treatment cultures demonstrated eradication of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis in all cases.

Comparative efficacy and safety of mezlocillin, cefoxitin, and clindamycin plus gentamicin in postpartum endometritis.

The efficacy of mezlocillin versus cefoxitin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin was evaluated in 152 patients with postpartum endometritis. There were no statistically significant differences in rate of cure among the three groups (87% with mezlocillin, 82% with cefoxitin, and 92% with clindamycin-gentamicin). There were no severe adverse reactions observed in any of the three treatment regimens. Mezlocillin is as safe and effective as cefoxitin and clindamycin-gentamicin for treatment of postpartum endometritis.

Amdinocillin plus cefoxitin versus cefoxitin alone in therapy of mixed soft tissue infections (including diabetic foot infections).

In a randomized comparative trial, 45 patients were treated with amdinocillin plus cefoxitin or cefoxitin alone for bacterial soft tissue infections. Most patients were diabetic and had polymicrobial foot infections. The combination of amdinocillin plus cefoxitin was active in vitro against 71 percent of the isolates obtained before therapy as compared with 65 percent for cefoxitin alone. The combination demonstrated synergy for 29 percent of the isolates tested. A satisfactory clinical response occurred in 90 percent and 71 percent of patients treated with the combination regimen and cefoxitin, respectively, (p greater than 0.1). An increase in serum creatinine thought to be due to interstitial nephritis occurred in one patient treated with the combination regimen. The combination of amdinocillin and cefoxitin was effective in mixed soft tissue infections including diabetic foot infections.

Cefoxitin therapy in aerobic, anaerobic, and mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections.

Cefoxitin, a new beta-lactamase-resistant cephamycin, was evaluated in 66 patients for clinical and bacteriological efficacy, serum levels, tolerance, and toxicity. Seventeen patients had soft tissue infections, 14 had pleuropulmonary infections, 14 had intraabdominal infections, 13 had pelvic infections, and 8 had urinary tract infections. Among the 66 patients, 62 were cured and 4 could not be evaluated. Twelve patients had hospital-acquired infections, 31 had underlying disease, and 45 required a surgical procedure. Isolates included 116 aerobic and 72 anaerobic bacteria. Cefoxitin was more active than cephalothin against facultative and obligate anaerobic gram-negative organisms isolated from these patients. Mean peak cefoxitin levels in sera were 52 micrograms/ml after a 2-g infusion and 30 micrograms/ml after a 1-g infusion. Phlebitis occurred in two patients, eosinophilia in one, rash in two, vasculitis in one, and transient rises in SGOT and SGPT in two. Cefoxitin appears to be a safe and effective drug for the treatment of many aerobic, anaerobic, and mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections.

The efficacy and tolerance of cefoxitin in the treatment of paediatric infections.

Eleven paediatric patients ranging in age from 7 weeks to 7 years were treated with intravenous cefoxitin for a variety of moderate or severe infections. All identifiable pathogens were sensitive to cefoxitin and the clinical outcome for every patient was regarded as a cure. Cefoxitin was well tolerated by all patients, the institution of therapy being associated in many cases with a rapid improvement in clinical condition.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of parental cefoxitin in infants and children.

Thirty-two infants and children ranging in age from 3 to 151 months (mean, 26 months) were treated with parenteral cefoxitin (150 mg/kg per day). Ten patients with isolates of Haemophilus influenzae (six with cellulitis, two with arthritis, and two with mastoiditis), four with Staphylococcus aureus (one with lymphadenitis, one with septicemia, and two with abscess), and three patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae (one each with cellulitis, abscess, and arthritis), were clinically and bacteriologically cured by therapy. Two additional patients with septic arthritis and facial cellulitis developed meningitis with H. influenzae type b and S. pneumoniae, respectively. Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations were 20 mug/ml for one strain of S. aureus and one of H. influenzae type b. The mean peak serum levels were 81.9 and 68.5 mug/ml 15 min after intravenous or intramuscular doses, respectively. The mean elimination half-lives were 42.4 and 40.1 min after intravenous or intramuscular doses, respectively. The mean volumes of distribution were 5,540 and 4,760 ml after intravenous and intramuscular doses, respectively. Mean plasma clearance was 242 and 257 ml/min per m(2) after intravenous and intramuscular doses, respectively. Therapy was discontinued in one patient because of neutropenia, which resolved after cefoxitin was stopped. Eosinophilia and transiently elevated liver function tests occurred in eight and six patients, respectively. These data indicate that cefoxitin may be an effective treatment for infections due to susceptible bacteria in the dosage tested, but its use may be limited because of the occurrence of meningitis during therapy in some patients.

Effects on renal function of treatment with cefoxitin alone or in combination with furosemide.

The glomerular filtration rate measured by 51Chrome-EDTA and serum half life of cefoxitin were followed in patients with preexisting moderate renal impairment. The patients were treated with cefoxitin for two to three weeks because of chronic serious infections. The dose used in patients with an initial clearance of more than 40 mg/ml was 1 g three times daily giving a mean peak concentration of 100 microgram/ml. Seven patients were treated with cefoxitin alone and twelve with cefoxitin and furosemide (80 mg daily orally). The glomerular filtration rate did not change significantly during treatment time. There were no signs of accumulation of cefoxitin as serum half life of the drug remained unchanged both in patients treated with and without furosemide concurrently.

Cefoxitin: clinical evaluation in thirty-eight patients.

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy, patient tolerance, and toxicity of cefoxitin, a beta-lactamase-resistant cephamycin, were evaluated in 38 patients; 13 had soft tissue infection, 12 had pneumonia, 3 had urinary tract infection, 2 had peritonitis, and 4 had miscellaneous infections. In five patients, infection was clinically evident, though not bacteriologically proven. The latter patients were evaluated with regard to tolerance and toxicity only. Among the 34 infections in 33 patients, 71% were considered clinically cured; 86% of those patients who could be recultured were bacteriologically cured. Phlebitis was noted in 32% of the total group, and eosinophilia was observed in 16%. Unexplained deterioration in renal function occurred in two patients. Mean peak cefoxitin levels in serum were 72 mug/ml 30 min after a 2-g infusion and 32 mug/ml 30 min after a 1-g infusion. Cefoxitin was more active against facultatively and obligately anaerobic gram-negative organisms isolated from these patients than was cephalothin.