Coupling Data Mining and Laboratory Experiments to Discover Drug Interactions Causing QT Prolongation.

BACKGROUND: QT interval-prolonging drug-drug interactions (QT-DDIs) may increase the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia. Despite guidelines for testing from regulatory agencies, these interactions are usually discovered after drugs are marketed and may go undiscovered for years. OBJECTIVES: Using a combination of adverse event reports, electronic health records (EHR), and laboratory experiments, the goal of this study was to develop a data-driven pipeline for discovering QT-DDIs. METHODS: 1.8 million adverse event reports were mined for signals indicating a QT-DDI. Using 1.6 million electrocardiogram results from 380,000 patients in our institutional EHR, these putative interactions were either refuted or corroborated. In the laboratory, we used patch-clamp electrophysiology to measure the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) channel block (the primary mechanism by which drugs prolong the QT interval) to evaluate our top candidate. RESULTS: Both direct and indirect signals in the adverse event reports provided evidence that the combination of ceftriaxone (a cephalosporin antibiotic) and lansoprazole (a proton-pump inhibitor) will prolong the QT interval. In the EHR, we found that patients taking both ceftriaxone and lansoprazole had significantly longer QTc intervals (up to 12 ms in white men) and were 1.4 times more likely to have a QTc interval above 500 ms. In the laboratory, we found that, in combination and at clinically relevant concentrations, these drugs blocked the hERG channel. As a negative control, we evaluated the combination of lansoprazole and cefuroxime (another cephalosporin), which lacked evidence of an interaction in the adverse event reports. We found no significant effect of this pair in either the EHR or in the electrophysiology experiments. Class effect analyses suggested this interaction was specific to lansoprazole combined with ceftriaxone but not with other cephalosporins. CONCLUSIONS: Coupling data mining and laboratory experiments is an efficient method for identifying QT-DDIs. Combination therapy of ceftriaxone and lansoprazole is associated with increased risk of acquired long QT syndrome.

Use of cefuroxime for women with community-onset acute pyelonephritis caused by cefuroxime-susceptible or -resistant Escherichia coli.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efforts to decrease the use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins are required to prevent the selection and transmission of multi-drug resistant pathogens, such as extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical efficacy of intravenous cefuroxime as an empirical antibiotic for the treatment of hospitalized women with acute pyelonephritis (APN) caused by Escherichia coli. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and microbiologic database of 328 hospitalized women with community-onset APN. RESULTS: Of 328 women with APN, 22 patients had cefuroxime-resistant E. coli APN, and 306 patients had cefuroxime-susceptible E. coli APN. The early clinical success rates were significantly higher (p = 0.001) in the cefuroxime-susceptible group (90.8%, 278/306) than in the cefuroxime-resistant group (68.2%, 15/22) at 72 hours. The clinical cure rates at 4 to 14 days after completing antimicrobial therapy were not significantly different in the cefuroxime-resistant or -susceptible groups, with 88.2% (15/17) and 97.8% (223/228; p = 0.078), respectively. The microbiological cure rates were not significantly different and were 90.9% (10/11) and 93.4% (128/137), respectively (p = 0.550). The median duration of hospitalization in the cefuroxime-resistant and -susceptible groups was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8 to 13) and 10 days (IQR, 8 to 14), respectively (p =0.319). CONCLUSIONS: Cefuroxime, a second-generation cephalosporin, can be used for the initial empirical therapy of community-onset APN if tailored according to uropathogen identification and susceptibility results, especially in areas where the prevalence rate of ESBL-producing uropathogens is low.

Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment is one of the major pharmacologic treatments for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the choice of antibiotic depends on the local resistance pattern. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was done in patients with AECOPD to compare the efficacy of levofloxacin with that of cefuroxime axetil. METHODS: Patients with AECOPD and without radiographic evidence of pneumonia were enrolled and randomized to either levofloxacin 500 mg daily or cefuroxime 250 mg twice daily in the mildmoderate exacerbation group, or 500 mg twice daily in the severe exacerbation group, for seven days. Clinical efficacy and microbiologic response were evaluated 5-7 days after the last dose. RESULTS: Treatment was clinically successful in 90.4% of patients in the levofloxacin group, and in 90.6% of patients in the cefuroxime group (95% confidence interval -9.40 to 10.91), within a noninferiority margin of 10%. The microbiologic response appeared to be higher in the levofloxacin group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The safety profile was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin is not inferior to cefuroxime with regard to clinical efficacy in treating AECOPD.

Comparison of two oral regimens for the outpatient treatment of low-risk cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and fever: ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime axetil versus ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate.

The objective of this investigation was to assess retrospectively the safety and the efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime axetil compared to the combination of oral ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate, as initial outpatient treatment, in low-risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. We analysed retrospectively 120 episodes of febrile neutropenia, treated on an outpatient basis at 2 different oncology units; 63 episodes were treated with the oral regimen of ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate and 57 were treated with the combination of oral ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime. 20 treatment failures were recorded-2 of them among patients receiving ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate and 18 in the ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime group. Univariate analysis showed that the administration of ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime was associated with a worse outcome compared to the regimen ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (OR 11, CI 2.42-49.9, p =0.002). In the multivariate model, after adjusting for the absolute number of neutrophils and the duration of neutropenia, the effect of the antibiotic regimen on the outcome disappeared, and no significant differences between the 2 regimens were noted, although the regimen of ciprofloxacin plus cefuroxime was associated with a trend to a worse outcome (OR 4.74, CI 0.72-31.1, p =0.10). In conclusion, the 2 regimens appeared equally safe and effective but prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Severe anaphylactic reaction after intracameral antibiotic administration during cataract surgery.

We report a severe anaphylactic reaction that occurred about 5 minutes after 1.0 mg of cefuroxime was injected into the anterior chamber after routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. The patient was known to be allergic to penicillin. Immediate action was taken, and the patient recovered well. The presence of staff trained in resuscitation was essential in this case and raises questions about the trend to perform routine topical anesthesia cataract surgery without an anesthesiologist in the operating room.

Antimicrobial-induced endotoxaemia in patients with sepsis in the field of acute pyelonephritis.

BACKGROUND: In vitro results have shown that antimicrobial agents may induce the Gram-negative bacteria to release endotoxins (LPS), which in turn, could trigger the secretion of cytokines from monocytes. AIMS: To compare the effect of cefuroxime, netilmicin or ciprofloxacin on serum levels of LPS and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha). METHODS: Seventy-four patients with acute pyelonephritis caused by Gram-negative bacteria and signs of sepsis were randomly assigned to receive one of three intravenous regimens of cefuroxime, netilmicin or ciprofloxacin. Blood samples were collected before therapy and at specified time intervals for 96 hours after the initiation of treatment for the determination of serum levels of LPS and of TNFalpha. RESULTS: Patients treated with cefuroxime presented an early peak of LPS and of TNFalpha in serum two hours after the initiation of treatment compared to the other study groups. After that time interval, concentrations of LPS and TNFalpha were similar in all the study groups. Fever accompanied by endotoxaemia was still detected for 48 hours after the start of therapy in 36, 37.5 and 36% of patients treated with cefuroxime, netilmicin and ciprofloxacin respectively. The corresponding figures for these agents at 72 hours were 28, 12.5 and 24%, respective and 12, 4.2 and 4% at 96 hours (P value not significant). CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of an early peak in the serum levels of LPS and TNFalpha in patients treated with cefuroxime, no significant difference could be detected amongst the study groups as far as their effect on serum levels of LPS and TNFalpha were concerned. This suggests that these three antimicrobial agents may be administered safely at the early stages of sepsis.

Suitability of cefotiam and cefuroxime axetil for the perioperative short-term prophylaxis in tonsillectomy patients.

The efficacy of the perioperative short-term prophylaxis with cefotiam (CAS 66309-69-1) and cefuroxime axetil (CAS 64544-07-6) was analysed by the assessment of the pharmacological kinetics in the serum and the tonsil tissue in 50 patients with recurrent tonsillitis. Twenty-four patients received 1 g cefotiam by the intravenous route 30 min to 4 h before the tonsillectomy, and 26 patients received 250 mg cefuroxime axetil orally 1 to 6 h before the tonsillectomy. Bactericidal serum levels were reached for cefotiam up to 4 h after intravenous application and for cefuroxime axetil up to 3 h after oral application. In the tissue of the tonsil there were proved levels which were definitely above the MIC 90 (MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration) known for the clinically relevant germs for cefotiam after 30 min up to 2 h, for cefuroxime axetil after only 2 h. Considering the distribution areas, the capacity of the protein binding and the microbiological measuring methods, one can expect an efficient antibiotic coverage after an intravenous one-shot bolus injection of 1 g cefotiam from 30 min to 4 h and after oral application of 250 mg cefuroxime axetil on an empty stomach from 1 to 6 h. Because of the short duration of a tonsillectomy and the serum and tonsil tissue kinetics cefotiam and cefuroxime axetil are suitable for the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis of high-risk patients.

Successful shortening from seven to four days of parenteral beta-lactam treatment for common childhood infections: a prospective and randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether 4-day parenteral beta-lactam therapy is as effective as 7-day therapy for children hospitalized for parenteral antimicrobials. METHODS: A series of patients aged 3 months to 15 years who fulfilled strict criteria for bacterial pneumonia, other respiratory infections, sepsis-like infections, and other acute infections were prospectively randomized to receive parenteral penicillin or cefuroxime randomly for 4 or 7 days. Besides blood and throat cultures, the etiology was searched by serology for 23 different agents. RESULTS: Of 154 children analyzed, a probable etiology was established in 96. Of those, a bacterial infection, with or without concomitant viral infection, was disclosed in 80% and 94% in the 4-day and 7-day treatment groups, respectively; pneumococcus being the commonest agent. There was one possible treatment failure in the 4-day group, but with a questionable relation to the short course. Three patients in the 4-day and two in the 7-day group underwent treatment changes, or were rehospitalized within 30 days. All children recovered entirely. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening parenteral beta-lactam treatment to 4 days in infections for which most parenteral antimicrobials are instituted, is not only safe, but reduces costs, is ecologically sound, and minimizes the risks of nosocomial infections and other adverse effects of treatment.

Comparison of moxifloxacin and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.

The aim of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin with those of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis. Five hundred forty-two adult patients with symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis received a 10-day oral regimen of either moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or cefuroxime axetil (250 mg twice daily). Acute signs and symptoms at presentation had lasted >7 days but <4 weeks. Clinical response at the end of therapy (7 to 14 days after treatment) was the primary efficacy variable. Four hundred fifty-seven of the patients (223 moxifloxacin, 234 cefuroxime axetil) were included in the clinical efficacy analysis. Moxifloxacin was found to be similar in effectiveness to cefuroxime axetil at the end-of-therapy visit (90% vs. 89%, respectively; 95% confidence interval, -5.1% to 6.2%). Clinical relapse at the follow-up visit was reported for only 8 patients (3 moxifloxacin, 5 cefuroxime axetil). No clinically significant differences were observed with respect to the number of patients experiencing a successful clinical response based on demographic or infection characteristics. Five of the 542 enrolled patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 537 patients in the intent-to-treat population, drug-related adverse events were reported in 37% of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 26% of cefuroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.006). Adverse-event profiles were comparable in the 2 treatment groups, with the exception of nausea, which was reported by 11% of moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4% of cef uroxime axetil-treated patients (P = 0.003). In this study, moxifloxacin was as effective as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of community-acquired acute sinusitis.

Randomized, double-blind study of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.

In a prospective, multicenter, double-blind study, the interval to clinical relapse in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis from whom a pretherapy pathogen was isolated was compared following treatment with ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil. Clinical and microbiological responses at the end of therapy were secondary efficacy variables. Outpatients randomly received either ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice a day for 14 days). Three hundred seven patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were enrolled, of whom 208 had an exacerbation due to a bacterial pathogen. Clinical resolution at the end of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil therapy for patients for whom efficacy could be evaluated was 93% and 90%, respectively. Bacteriologic eradication rates were statistically higher for ciprofloxacin recipients (96% [89 of 93]) than for cefuroxime axetil recipients (82% [80 of 97]) (P < .01). The median infection-free interval was 146 days for ciprofloxacin recipients vs. 178 days for cefuroxime axetil recipients (P = .37). In conclusion, ciprofloxacin was associated with an infection-free interval and clinical response that were similar to those associated with cefuroxime axetil, but the bacteriologic eradication rate associated with ciprofloxacin was statistically significantly higher than that associated with cefuroxime axetil.

Multicenter comparative trial of ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in a primary care setting. Rhinosinusitis Investigation Group.

In a primary care setting, the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) 500 mg b.i.d. were compared with those of cefuroxime axetil (CA) 250 mg b.i.d., each given for 10 days, in a nationwide, open, prospective, randomized trial of 1414 adults with acute sinusitis. Patients were enrolled if they had clinically documented acute sinusitis (ie, rhinosinusitis) (<4 weeks' duration), based on the 1997 American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery criteria of either two major or one major and two minor symptoms. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response (resolution or failure) at the posttherapy assessment on study days 14 through 26. The most common presenting major signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis were facial congestion, nasal drainage/purulence, facial pain/pressure, and nasal obstruction/blockage. The minor symptom, headache, was more common and severe than was nasal obstruction/blockage. A total of 1219 patients were clinically evaluable. Clinical resolution was observed in 559 of 613 (91.2%) CIP-treated patients and 546 of 606 (90. 1%) CA-treated patients. The two regimens were statistically equivalent (95% confidence interval, -2.16% to 4.71%). There were 80 drug-related adverse events reported in the CIP-treated patients and 81 drug-related adverse events reported in the CA-treated patients. The main adverse events were nausea (n = 18) and diarrhea (n = 7) in patients treated with CIP and diarrhea (n = 14), nausea (n = 12), headache (n = 7), and vaginitis (n = 7) in those treated with CA. CIP 500 mg b.i.d. was found to be statistically equivalent to CA 250 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis.

[Effect of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on hemodynamic stability during surgery: detection of complex interaction in a simulated clinical randomized animal study]. / Einfluss der perioperativen Antibiotikaprophylaxe auf die hämodynamische Stabilität während der Operation: Nachweis einer komplexen Interaktion in einer die Klinik modellierenden, randomisierten Tierstudie.

In a clinic modelling randomised trial (CMRT) in three groups of 10 land-race pietren pigs each it could be shown that the influence of prophylactic antibiotic administration on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and histamine release is only evident, if by stepwise addition of complicating factors the overall complexity of the experimental setting is increased. Different antibiotic regimen for prophylaxis significantly affected the incidence of cardiovascular instabilities only after relevant blood loss, restoration of circulation and subsequent submaximal induction of anaphylactoid reactions by the histamine liberator Polymyxin B. In conclusion, preclinical testing of therapeutic agents in complex clinic modelling randomised trials should be mandatory to avoid the possible hazards of misconducted clinical trials.

Ofloxacin monotherapy for the primary treatment of microbial keratitis: a double-masked, randomized, controlled trial with conventional dual therapy. The Ofloxacin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Ofloxacin is a potent broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic commercially available as a topical ophthalmic preparation. The authors compared ofloxacin (0.3%) as a single therapy with their conventional dual therapy of specially prepared, fortified gentamicin (1.5%) and cefuroxime (5.0%) drops for the treatment of suspected microbial keratitis. METHODS: The authors enrolled 122 patients with a clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis in a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-masked study to compare the two therapies. The ofloxacin drops were decanted into identical-looking bottles to the conventional treatment and dispensed with a second bottle containing saline only. The initial and subsequent assessments noted any risk factors, the size and location of the ulcer, and any evidence of corneal and conjunctival toxicity. All ulcers were scraped for microbiologic culture, and isolated organisms were tested for sensitivity to the trial antibiotics. For statistical analysis, a "cure" was defined as complete healing of the ulcer (no epithelial defect). A ratio of the two outcome proportions and its confidence limits was used to compare the two treatment groups. Multiple regression analysis using Poisson models was used to adjust for confounding factors that may have modified the outcome ratios. RESULTS: There was no difference in the treatment success between the two treatments, with 67.9% of the conventional treatment group and 62.1% of the ofloxacin group being cured within 14 days (ratio, 1.09; [95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.43]; P = 0.59). However, there was significantly more toxicity encountered with the conventional treatment group (50.8% vs. 10.2%; ratio, 5.00 [95% confidence interval, 2.25-11.11]; P < 0.0001). Poisson regression with adjustment for confounders did not materially change the ratio proportions for either treatment success or toxicity. There was at least a 90% chance to detect a 30% difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that the treatment outcomes with ofloxacin monotherapy compared favorably with their conventional therapy and were associated with less toxicity.

A comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

515 patients with intra-abdominal infection participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial in order to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of imipenem/cilastatin with cefuroxime/metronidazole. 258 patients (mean age 56 years) received imipenem/cilastatin 1.5-2.0 g/day, and 257 patients (mean age 54 years) received cefuroxime 3.0-4.5 g/day plus metronidazole 1.0-1.5 g/day for at least 3 days. 130/161 evaluable patients (80.8%) receiving imipenem/cilastatin and 124/145 evaluable patients (85.5%) receiving cefuroxime/metronidazole were clinically cured. The microbiological response was favorable in 86.9% in the imipenem/cilastatin group and in 90.8% in the cefuroxime/metronidazole group. The two treatment groups were similar with respect to median time to defervescence which was 4 days. The median duration of treatment was 6 days and the median time to discharge from hospital was 9 days in both groups. Drug-related adverse reactions were observed in 14 patients receiving iminpenem/cilastatin and in 8 patients receiving cefuroxime/metronidazole. 19 patients in the imipenen/cilastatin group and 12 patients in the cefuroxime/metronidazole group died. No correlation was found between the deaths and the study drugs. The present study shows that intra-abdominal infections can be treated successfully with imipenem/cilastatin as well as with cefuroxime/metronidazole.

Ciprofloxacin versus a tobramycin/cefuroxime combination in the treatment of serious systemic infections: a prospective, randomized and controlled study of efficacy and safety.

Sequential intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin (CF) was compared with a combination of tobramycin and cefuroxime (T/C) in the treatment of serious systemic infections. Altogether 310 patients were randomized, 160 receiving CF and 150 T/C, the 2 groups being reasonably well balanced. 29 patients without infection were excluded from the analysis. Complete clinical resolution was obtained in 75% (107/143) patients receiving CF and in 78% (107/138) receiving T/C; the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of bacterial eradication in septicaemia was 72% (95% confidence interval (95% c.i.): 58-86%) for patients treated with CF and 87% (95% c.i.: 77-96%) when T/C was given, while the eradication rates in urinary tract infection were 72% (95% c.i.: 54-90%) and 45% (95% c.i.: 23-67%) for CF and T/C, respectively. Significant differences in bacteriological response for other diagnoses were not detected. Also for lower respiratory tract infections (LTRI) the clinical and bacteriological responses were quite similar, although relatively more failures occurred in CF treated patients with LRTI caused by pneumococci. The frequencies of adverse reactions were comparable, but the reactions were less serious following CF treatment. Our results indicate that CF may be used for empirical treatment of serious infections. However, if pneumococcal etiology is likely, alternative antibiotics should be used, and if necessary, coverage against anaerobic bacteria should be added.

[Mezlocillin versus cefuroxime in urinary tract infections. A multicenter clinical study]. / Mezlocillin versus Cefuroxim bei Harnwegsinfektionen. Klinische multizentrische Vergleichsstudie.

In a multicenter randomised clinical comparative study 96 urological patients with established urinary tract infection were treated in 50% with 2 g mezlocillin three times and in 50% with 1.5 g cefuroxime three times. Both antibiotics were shown to be antibacterially active substances with a high bacterial elimination rate. Three days after cessation of treatment the urine was sterile in 79 cases. Follow-up investigations 1-2 weeks later showed that the number of recurrences and reinfections was higher in the cefuroxime group than in the mezlocillin group. This difference is statistically significant so that mezlocillin can be considered the more effective antibiotic. Clinical and urine cytological results correlated with bacteriological results. Side effects were observed rarely, and toxic effects not at all.

Comparison of cefuroxime and penicillin in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea.

In a randomized double-blind trial, 216 men and 142 women infected with uncomplicated gonorrhea were treated with either 1.5 g of cefuroxime or 4.8 x 10(6) U of aqueous procaine penicillin G intramuscularly and 1.0 g of probenecid. The cure rates in the treatment groups were 96 and 95%, respectively. Intramuscularly administered cefuroxime was better tolerated than was procaine penicillin. Comparative antibiotic susceptibility studies revealed that cefuroxime and penicillin were about equally active and that both were more active than cefamandole or cefoxitin. Because cefuroxime is not degraded by the action of beta-lactamase enzymes, it has promise as an alternative to spectinomycin in the treatment of penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.