Experiences and perceptions of people who use heroin: public health lessons from Hermosillo, Mexico.

Heroin consumption in Mexico is low compared with its use in the United States; however, this practice is more common in the northern region of Mexico than in the rest of the country, being documented only in cities that are located exactly at the Mexico-U.S. border. The Mexican legal framework is focused on rehabilitation, but its effects on the lives of users are unknown. The objective of this research was to analyze how the regulatory Mexican framework is conceptualized and practiced in the daily life of a group of heroin users from a northern city, where consumption has recently spread and has not been documented. We collected the official registered data from users and conducted a qualitative study in Hermosillo, Sonora. A research on the legal framework was conducted, as well as on the city's context. Data on heroin users can be found at HIV health center, as there is no other source of such records. The Mexican legal framework aims at rehabilitation and at avoiding criminalization; however, the daily life of users drives them towards crime circuits: people commit crimes to stay in prison, where they can control the addiction and get heroin, in case of abstinence. The Mexican State has no empirical information to improve its programs and laws related to the use of heroin. The daily practices of users become not only epidemiological but social risks to the community and to the users themselves. Also, the lack of access due to stigmatization, criminalization and violence, increases the inequities, creating a cycle that reproduces poverty and suffering as part of a social structure. Therefore, changes are needed in the justice system.

Experiences and perceptions of people who use heroin: public health lessons from Hermosillo, Mexico / Experiencias y percepciones de personas que usan heroína: lecciones de salud pública desde Hermosillo, México / As experiências e percepções de usuários de heroína: lições de saúde pública de Hermosillo, México

Abstract: Heroin consumption in Mexico is low compared with its use in the United States; however, this practice is more common in the northern region of Mexico than in the rest of the country, being documented only in cities that are located exactly at the Mexico-U.S. border. The Mexican legal framework is focused on rehabilitation, but its effects on the lives of users are unknown. The objective of this research was to analyze how the regulatory Mexican framework is conceptualized and practiced in the daily life of a group of heroin users from a northern city, where consumption has recently spread and has not been documented. We collected the official registered data from users and conducted a qualitative study in Hermosillo, Sonora. A research on the legal framework was conducted, as well as on the city's context. Data on heroin users can be found at HIV health center, as there is no other source of such records. The Mexican legal framework aims at rehabilitation and at avoiding criminalization; however, the daily life of users drives them towards crime circuits: people commit crimes to stay in prison, where they can control the addiction and get heroin, in case of abstinence. The Mexican State has no empirical information to improve its programs and laws related to the use of heroin. The daily practices of users become not only epidemiological but social risks to the community and to the users themselves. Also, the lack of access due to stigmatization, criminalization and violence, increases the inequities, creating a cycle that reproduces poverty and suffering as part of a social structure. Therefore, changes are needed in the justice system.

Resumen: El consumo de heroína en México es bajo si se compara con su consumo en EE.UU.; no obstante, esta práctica es más común en la zona norte de México que en el resto del país, estando documentada solamente en ciudades que están localizadas exactamente en la frontera entre México y EE.UU. El marco legal mexicano está centrado en la rehabilitación, sin embargo sus efectos en las vidas de los consumidores son desconocidos. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar cómo se conceptualiza el marco regulatorio mexicano, y cómo se hace realidad en la vida diaria de un grupo de personas usuarias de heroína, procedentes de una ciudad del norte, donde recientemente el consumo se ha extendido y no se ha documentado. Nosotros recogimos datos oficiales registrados de consumidores y realizamos un estudio cualitativo en Hermosillo, Sonora. Se realizó una investigación sobre el marco legal, así como del contexto de la ciudad. Los datos sobre los consumidores de heroína sólo se pueden encontrar en centros de salud especializados en VIH, pues que no existe otra fuente para tales registros. El marco legal mexicano pretende la rehabilitación y evitar la criminalización; sin embargo, la vida diaria de los consumidores les conduce hacia los circuitos del crimen: la gente comete delitos para estar en prisión, donde pueden controlar la adicción y conseguir heroína, en caso de abstinencia. El estado mexicano no cuenta con información empírica para mejorar los programas y leyes relacionadas con el consumo de heroína. Las prácticas diarias de los consumidores se han convertido no sólo en riesgos epidemiológicas, sino tambiém en riesgos sociales para la comunidad y los propios consumidores. Asimismo, la falta de acceso debido a la estigmatización, la criminalización y la violencia, incrementa las inequidades, creando un círculo vicioso que reproduce la pobreza y el sufrimiento, como parte de la estructura social. Por ello, es necesario que se produzcan cambios en el sistema judicial.

Resumo: O consumo da heroína é baixo no México, comparado ao uso nos Estados Unidos, porém essa prática é mais comum na região Norte do México em comparação com o resto do país, sendo documentada apenas nas cidades localizadas justamente na fronteira com os Estados Unidos. A legislação mexicana visa principalmente a reabilitação, mas seus efeitos sobre a vida dos usuários não são conhecidos. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar a maneira pela qual o arcabouço regulatório mexicano é conceituado e praticado na vida diária de um grupo de usuários de heroína de um município no Norte do México, onde o consumo tem sido disseminado recentemente, mas sem ter sido documentado até então. Foram coletados os dados oficiais sobre usuários, seguido por um estudo qualitativo em Hermosillo, no Estado de Sonora. Foram estudados a legislação pertinente e o contexto local em Hermosillo. Os dados sobre os usuários de heroína foram encontrados nos centros de atendimento a pessoas com HIV, uma vez que não existe outra fonte desses registros. A legislação mexicana visa a reabilitação dos usuários, evitando sua criminalização, mas sua vida cotidiana os empurra para os circuitos do crime. Assim, os indivíduos cometem crimes para permanecer na prisão, onde conseguem controlar a dependência e obter a droga em casos de síndrome de abstinência. O governo mexicano não dispõe de dados empíricos para melhorar os programas e leis relacionados ao uso da heroína. As práticas diárias dos usuários se transformam em riscos, não apenas epidemiológicos como também sociais, tanto para a comunidade quanto para os próprios usuários. Além disso, a falta de acesso a serviços, em função da combinação de estigmatização, criminalização e violência, aumenta as desigualdades, criando um ciclo que reproduz e o sofrimento enquanto parte de uma estrutura social. Portanto, são necessárias mudanças urgentes no sistema de justiça.

The political and scientific challenges in evaluating compulsory drug treatment centers in Southeast Asia.

BACKGROUND: In Vietnam, like many countries in Southeast Asia, the commonly used approach of center-based compulsory drug treatment (CCT) has been criticized on human rights ground. Meanwhile, community-based voluntary methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been implemented for nearly a decade with promising results. Reform-minded leaders have been seeking empirical evidence of the costs and effectiveness associated with these two main treatment modalities. Conducting evaluations of these treatments, especially where randomization is not ethical, presents challenges. The aim of this paper is to discuss political challenges and methodological issues when conducting cost-effectiveness studies within the context of a non-democratic Southeast Asian country. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the political and scientific challenges that were experienced in the study design, sample size determination, government approval and ethics approvals, participant recruitment, data collection, and determination of sources, and quantification of cost and effectiveness data was undertaken. As a consequence of the non-randomized design, analysis of patient characteristics for both treatment types was undertaken to identify the magnitude of baseline group differences. Concordance between self-reported heroin use and urine drug testing was undertaken to determine the reliability of self-report data in a politically challenging environment. RESULTS: We demonstrate that conducting research around compulsory treatment in a non-democratic society is feasible, yet it is politically challenging and requires navigation between science and politics. We also demonstrate that engagement with the government decision makers in the research conception, implementation, and dissemination of the results increases the likelihood of research evidence being considered for change in a contentious drug policy area. CONCLUSIONS: Local empirical evidence on the comparative cost-effectiveness of CCT and MMT in a Southeast Asian setting is critical to consideration of more holistic, humane, and effective drug-dependence treatment approaches, but the garnering of such evidence is very challenging.

Utilization, measurement, and funding of recovery supports and services.

An environmental survey was conducted regarding substance abuse recovery supports and services (RSS) delivered across California, where these services are offered, and by whom. Inquiries were made regarding RSS measurement efforts, funding mechanisms, and technical assistance needs. A survey was disseminated to all 57 administrators of county alcohol and other drug or behavioral departments. Results indicate that 62% (23 of 37) of responding counties offer RSS. Overall, certified addiction counselors (CACs) were the staff most utilized to provide RSS, followed by peers, clinicians, and volunteers. Among recovery-community organizations (RCOs), peers, volunteers, and CACs were the most utilized staff. Sober living homes were the most prevalent type of RCO, followed by recovery centers, faith-based/recovery ministries, and recovery schools. Forty-five percent of counties reported funding RSS; 37.8% collect data. RSS may provide valuable support services for individuals recovering from alcohol/drug use; however, the field must further define RSS and develop measurement strategies to justify RSS funding.

The medicalization of addiction treatment professionals.

In a previous article, the authors described the changes initiated by recent health care legislation, and how those changes might affect the practice of medicine and the delivery of addiction services. This article reviews the same changes with respect to how they have the potential to change the practice activities of addiction physicians, addiction therapists, addiction counselors and addiction nurses, as well as the activities of administrators and service delivery financial personnel. Developments in delivery systems and the impact of those developments on professionals who work in addiction treatment are considered; current problems, potential solutions, and opportunities for clinicians under health reform are addressed. The goals envisioned for health system reform and the potential for realization of those goals via changes in addiction service delivery design and clinical practice are discussed.

[Fragments of the history of healthcare for users of alcohol and other drugs in Brazil: from Justice to Public Health]. / Fragmentos da história da atenção à saúde para usuários de álcool e outras drogas no Brasil: da Justiça à Saúde Pública.

The purpose of this article is to identify, factors that could be associated to the establishment of the country's health policy for users of alcohol and other drugs in 2003. It makes particular use of semi-structured interviews, as well as a study of the literature and documents. The article shows that the Brazilian State's approach to alcohol and drugs emerged in the early 20th century with the creation of a legal and institutional apparatus designed to control the sale and use of drugs, justified by the need to assure public security and public health. This apparatus permitted the development of healthcare practices for drug users based on the penalties it proposed. The article concludes that even though the rationales behind legal and public health measures do not always coincide, some of the practices that emerged in the legal sphere did help provide the conditions needed for the creation of a health policy for alcohol and drug users in Brazil in 2003.

Drug treatment courts and the disease paradigm.

A defining feature of the drug treatment court movement is the judicial adoption of the disease model for explaining drug using behavior; an interpretive paradigm that historically has not played a defining role in the adjudication of drug offenders. In drug treatment courts, however, the disease model finds a very central place in the adjudicative process, and profoundly shapes the way judges view and treat defendants. This article examines the application of the disease model to drug and non-drug-related crimes in the context of drug treatment courts, and considers the significance of these developments as it concerns the meaning of criminal justice.

Magistrates' Early Referral into Treatment (MERIT): preliminary findings of a 12-month court diversion trial for drug offenders.

The purpose of this paper is to present a description and preliminary findings of a 12-month trial of a Local Court diversion programme, called MERIT for Magistrates' Early Referral into Treatment. The aim of MERIT is to divert eligible drug offenders to treatment and rehabilitation services. A total of 172 offenders were assessed and 131 entered the programme. The sources of referral were court (58%), police (17%) and self (10%). Main problem drugs were heroin (57%), cannabis (21%) and amphetamines (11%). The majority (85%) had previous convictions and 50% had been in jail. At the end of the trial period one-third (33%) completed the programme and one-third (33%) remained in treatment. Main treatment interventions were case management and out-patient counselling, detoxification, residential rehabilitation and methadone maintenance. Police records showed that of the original 43 (33%) graduates only six had come to police notice, mainly for relatively minor offences. Early acceptance and preliminary results has led to an expansion of the MERIT programme across New South Wales. With the rapid expansion of drug courts and diversion programmes across Australia, descriptive studies are useful to provide beneficial data to assist policy makers and service providers to develop programmes.

Treatment as harm reduction, defunding as harm maximization: the case of methadone maintenance.

Despite numerous research studies demonstrating the efficacy of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in general and the value of retention in particular, the increasing defunding of this modality has compromised its potential. From 1990 to 1995 the lead author conducted a longitudinal research project to determine the impact of the cost of treatment on 233 San Francisco Bay Area study participants seeking, enrolled in, or defunded from MMT. This paper reports on selected findings from that study. Using variables of drug use, crime, gender and HIV risk, qualitative and quantitative results comparing those seeking treatment with those enrolled in treatment indicated that MMT functioned as a harm-reduction tool. When clients were defunded, however, drug use, crime and HIV risk increased and harm was maximized.