Context-sensitive holistic care of women with one previous Caesarean section.

This article's emphasis is on the holistic care of women who are assessed as suitable for and amenable to vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) in the South African state health sector context. It is beyond its scope to deal with the minutiae of VBAC conduct, operative conduct of repeat Caesarean section (CS), or management of uterine rupture. It is also beyond the scope of the article to reflect on practices, which are accepted in other healthcare contexts. The intention is not to promote VBAC over elective repeat CS, but rather to assist healthcare workers with providing high-quality holistic care. The goal is that women with previous CS are given access to the mode of delivery, which is safest for them and their fetus, while minimising adverse psychological effects of previous and future negative birth experiences.

Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Views of Women From Countries With High VBAC Rates.

Despite the consequences for women's health, a repeat cesarean section (CS) birth after a previous CS is common in Western countries. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) is recommended for most women, yet VBAC rates are decreasing and vary across maternity organizations and countries. We investigated women's views on factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC in countries where VBAC rates are high. We interviewed 22 women who had experienced VBAC in Finland, the Netherlands, and Sweden. We used content analysis, which revealed five categories: receiving information from supportive clinicians, receiving professional support from a calm and confident midwife/obstetrician during childbirth, knowing the advantages of VBAC, letting go of the previous childbirth in preparation for the new birth, and viewing VBAC as the first alternative for all involved when no complications are present. These findings reflect not only women's needs but also sociocultural factors influencing their views on VBAC.

Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The number of caesarean sections (CS) is increasing globally, and repeat CS after a previous CS is a significant contributor to the overall CS rate. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) can be seen as a real and viable option for most women with previous CS. To achieve success, however, women need the support of their clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinician-centred interventions designed to increase the rate of VBAC. METHODS: The bibliographic databases of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL were searched for randomised controlled trials, including cluster randomised trials that evaluated the effectiveness of any intervention targeted directly at clinicians aimed at increasing VBAC rates. Included studies were appraised independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted independently by three reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool, 'Effective Public Health Practice Project'. The primary outcome measure was VBAC rates. RESULTS: 238 citations were screened, 255 were excluded by title and abstract. 11 full-text papers were reviewed; eight were excluded, resulting in three included papers. One study evaluated the effectiveness of antepartum x-ray pelvimetry (XRP) in 306 women with one previous CS. One study evaluated the effects of external peer review on CS birth in 45 hospitals, and the third evaluated opinion leader education and audit and feedback in 16 hospitals. The use of external peer review, audit and feedback had no significant effect on VBAC rates. An educational strategy delivered by an opinion leader significantly increased VBAC rates. The use of XRP significantly increased CS rates. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicates that few studies have evaluated the effects of clinician-centred interventions on VBAC rates, and interventions are of varying types which limited the ability to meta-analyse data. A further limitation is that the included studies were performed during the late 1980s-1990s. An opinion leader educational strategy confers benefit for increasing VBAC rates. This strategy should be further studied in different maternity care settings and with professionals other than physicians only.

The impact of kangaroo care and music on maternal state anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of kangaroo care (KC) has not been adequately studied in mothers. This present study was undertaken to determine if music during KC has a greater effect than KC alone, on maternal state anxiety (MSA) in the early postpartum period. DESIGN AND SETTING: In a randomized controlled trial, 90 Iranian women who were scheduled for a repeat Cesarean-section, were randomized into three groups: KC, music during KC, and a control group. Mothers' pain scores were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). If the VAS score was ≤3, then MSA was measured by using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Scale (Spielberg). Interventions were 30 min KC for mother-infant dyads, or playing music for the mothers during KC. Six hours later, in cases where the VAS was ≤3, the MSA was re-measured using Spielberg's scale for all mothers. RESULTS: Six hours post intervention, there was no significant difference in the overall mean scores of MSA between the groups, but the severity of MSA in the two experimental groups was less than in the control group (P=0.02), although not between the two experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide evidence that KC has an effect on the severity of MSA in mothers who were delivered by C-section, however, music during KC had no more effect than KC alone. More research is needed to document the effectiveness of selected or familiar music during KC on state anxiety in early postpartum.

Roundtable discussion: "no one can condemn you to a C-section!".

The stories in this Roundtable Discussion are related by two women whose babies were born recently in Canadian hospitals. Each woman had undergone a cesarean delivery for her first child, and whereas Sophia delivered her second baby by vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC), Marie was unable to find a practitioner or hospital that would allow her to have a VBAC for her second birth. The women describe how they feel about their choices and experiences. Their two accounts and the issues that they raise are discussed in commentaries by a family physician, midwife, doula, and obstetrician.

Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of health professionals on the factors influencing repeat caesarean section. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with professionals who care for women in pregnancy and labour. SETTING: Acute hospital trust with two maternity units and community midwifery service, Leicestershire, UK. SAMPLE: Twenty-five midwives and doctors. METHODS: Interviews with professionals were undertaken using a prompt guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on the constant comparative method, assisted by QSR N5 software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of factors influencing professional decision making about repeat caesarean section. RESULTS: Decision making in relation to repeat caesarean is a complex process involving several parties. Professionals identify the relevance of evidence for decision making for repeat caesarean. However, professionals feel that following strict protocols is of limited value because of the perceived substandard quality of evidence in this area, other external pressures and the contingent, unique and often unanticipated features of each case. Professionals also perceive that the organisation of care plays an important role in rates of repeat caesarean. CONCLUSIONS: Decision making for repeat caesarean is a social practice where standardised protocols may have limited value. Attention needs to be given to the multiple parties involved in the decision-making process. Reflective practice, opinion leadership and role modelling may offer ways forward but will require evaluation.