Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sex Transm Dis ; 47(2): 111-113, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688726

RESUMEN

Targeted antibiotics could delay emergence of resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The DNA gyrase subunit A assay predicts susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. A model found that adding a $50 gyrase subunit A test for asymptomatic patients screened for N. gonorrhoeae resulted in cost neutrality. When ciprofloxacin susceptibility was high, a $114 test resulted in savings.


Asunto(s)
Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/economía , Girasa de ADN/análisis , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Gonorrea/economía , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estados Unidos
2.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 34(5): 739-45, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22821621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resistance of microorganisms to existing antimicrobial agents threatens the effective utilization of available resources in sub-Saharan Africa. Cost-effective utilization of antibacterial agents is essential in effective health care delivery in Nigeria. OBJECTIVES: To determine the most cost effective antibacterial agent in the treatment of S. aureus infections in Lagos metropolis. SETTING: The study was carried out in a teaching hospital, a specialist hospital, a referral center and two private hospitals. METHODS: Cost effectiveness analysis of ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime and gentamicin identified to be most effective agent against 463 clinical isolates of S. aureus obtained from the five hospitals was carried out on the basis of societal, health care and third party perspectives using 'decision table" as an analytical model. Criteria considered in the model included degree of efficacy of the agents, adherence tendencies and tolerability. Both direct (cost of drugs, diagnosis/monitoring, personnel and transportation) and indirect (loss of productivity) costs were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These include economic outcome as total therapy cost, clinical outcomes as extent of antibacterial effectiveness obtained from degree of antibacterial efficacy, a proxy measurement of cure rates, and adherence tendency. Humanistic outcome was also measured as tolerability prorated from literature reported degree of adverse drug reactions events, risk of infection and pains from drug administration. RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin tablet is a dominant option and much more cost-effective than either cefuroxime or gentamicin in the treatment of S. aureus in Lagos. Regardless of the perspective of analysis, ciprofloxacin has the least cost effectiveness ratio of NGN4214.66 ($28.09), NGN2392.63 ($16.00) and NGN2048.66 ($13.65) from societal, health care and third party payer perspectives, respectively. Sensitivity analysis by increasing the effectiveness index of gentamicin injection-the least cost effective option to the value for the most cost effective option did not change the results. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin should be used as first-line-treatment of S aureus in Lagos as it will lead to significant cost savings in the treatment of S. aureus infections.


Asunto(s)
Cefuroxima/economía , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Gentamicinas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(9): 3763-9, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20585135

RESUMEN

The objectives of the present study were to determine the effects of multiple targeted interventions on the level of use of quinolones and the observed rates of resistance to quinolones in Escherichia coli isolates from hospitalized patients. A bundle consisting of four interventions to improve the use of quinolones was implemented. The outcome was measured from the monthly levels of use of intravenous (i.v.) and oral quinolones and the susceptibility patterns for E. coli isolates from hospitalized patients. Statistical analyses were performed using segmented regression analysis and segmented Poisson regression models. Before the bundle was implemented, the annual use of quinolones was 2.7 defined daily doses (DDDs)/100 patient days. After the interventions, in 2007, this was reduced to 1.7 DDDs/100 patient days. The first intervention, a switch from i.v. to oral medication, was associated with a stepwise reduction in i.v. quinolone use of 71 prescribed daily doses (PDDs) per month (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47 to 95 PDDs/month, P < 0.001). Intervention 2, introduction of a new antibiotic guideline and education program, was associated with a stepwise reduction in the overall use of quinolones (reduction, 107 PDDs/month [95% CI = 58 to 156 PDDs/month). Before the interventions the quinolone resistance rate was increasing, on average, by 4.6% (95% CI = 2.6 to 6.1%) per year. This increase leveled off, which was associated with intervention 2 and intervention 4, active monitoring of prescriptions and feedback. Trends in resistance to other antimicrobial agents did not change. This study showed that the hospital-wide use of quinolones can be significantly reduced by an active policy consisting of multiple interventions. There was also a stepwise reduction in the rate of quinolone resistance associated with the bundle of interventions.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/economía , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Estudios Prospectivos , Quinolonas/administración & dosificación , Quinolonas/economía
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 65(6): 1286-91, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20363806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of generic versions of drugs has often resulted in an increase in the consumption of the agents involved. In December 2001, generic ciprofloxacin was marketed in Denmark. Our objective was to evaluate, in a community setting, the effect of price on consumption of ciprofloxacin and on ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli urine isolates. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective ecological study collecting monthly national data on the number of marketed versions and primary healthcare (PHC) sales of ciprofloxacin during January 1995-December 2005. Data were compared with a median price per defined daily dose (DDD) of ciprofloxacin during September 1999-December 2005. Yearly PHC consumption data from seven Danish counties were compared with the antimicrobial resistance profiles of PHC E. coli urine isolates. RESULTS: During 2002, the number of marketed versions increased from 3 to 10, and the median price per DDD decreased by 53%. From 2002 to 2005, the total consumption of oral ciprofloxacin in PHC increased significantly from 0.13 DDD/1000 inhabitant-days to 0.33 DDD/1000 inhabitant-days. During the same period, the frequency of ciprofloxacin resistance increased by 200%. A statistically significant correlation was found between the consumption of ciprofloxacin and the ciprofloxacin resistance rate in E. coli urine isolates, independent of the introduction of generic ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: After the introduction of generic ciprofloxacin, a significant increase in the total consumption of oral ciprofloxacin in PHC was observed in Denmark. The increase in consumption was significantly correlated with ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli obtained from urine isolates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Orina/microbiología , Antibacterianos/economía , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Dinamarca , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Chemother ; 21(2): 188-92, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19423472

RESUMEN

The aim of cystic fibrosis (CF) care is to improve both the life expectancy and quality of life of patients. However, rising costs and limited resources of health services must be taken into account. There are many different antibiotic strategies for therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in CF patients. In this 5-year retrospective study we found that the cost of treatment of initial infection is considerably lower than the cost of treating chronic P. aeruginosa infections. The percentage distribution of costs of antibiotic treatment in relationship to the administration route was considerably different between outpatients and inpatients. We observed an increase in antibiotic costs with the age of the patient and the decrease in FEV(1)values. The implementation of early eradication treatment, in addition to decreasing the prevalence of patients chronically infected by P. aeruginosa, might also bring about a notable decrease in costs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Quística/economía , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/economía , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/economía , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Clavulánicos/economía , Ácidos Clavulánicos/uso terapéutico , Colistina/economía , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Humanos , Meropenem , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/etiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tienamicinas/economía , Tienamicinas/uso terapéutico , Ticarcilina/economía , Ticarcilina/uso terapéutico , Tobramicina/economía , Tobramicina/uso terapéutico
6.
Eur J Intern Med ; 19(8): 619-24, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19046729

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia is well established. The best regimen is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of a once daily high dose of ceftriaxone plus ciprofloxacin versus thrice daily ceftazidime plus amikacin in neutropenic febrile patients. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with febrile neutropenia were included in a prospective, controlled, randomized, non-blind, comparative study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups (63 to the ceftriaxone/ciprofloxacin group and 32 to the ceftazidime/amikacin group) and evaluated as successes or failures according to defined criteria. Daily assessments were made of all patients and all adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The overall incidence of documented infections was 45.9%: 24/47 (51.1%) in the ceftriaxone/ciprofloxacin group and 10/27 (37%) in the ceftazidime/amikacin group. There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the groups (p=0.011) at the end of therapy. The ceftriaxone/ciprofloxacin group had an overall incidence of resolution and improvement of 95.7% in comparison to 75% in the ceftazidime/amikacin group. Thirty-nine organisms were isolated, 26 (66.67%) gram-negative and 13 (33.33%) gram-positive. There was a low incidence of adverse events in both groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of a single, high dose of ceftriaxone plus ciprofloxacin daily was more effective than the standard combination of thrice daily ceftazidime plus amikacin with no significant adverse events in either group.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ceftriaxona/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Amicacina/efectos adversos , Amicacina/economía , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Ceftazidima/efectos adversos , Ceftazidima/economía , Ceftriaxona/efectos adversos , Ceftriaxona/economía , Ciprofloxacina/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Grecia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Rev Invest Clin ; 59(3): 197-205, 2007.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17910412

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Rhinosinusitis is one of the more common diseases encountered in outpatient visits to health care. The objective of this study was to determine the most cost-effective antibiotic treatment for patients with acute (RSA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (RSC) that is available at the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis of RSA and RSC treatment from an institutional perspective. Effectiveness outcome was defined as the percentage of cure. A decision tree with a Bayesian approach included the following therapeutic alternatives: ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol (TMP/SMX), amoxicilin/clavulanic acid (AAC) and clindamicin. RESULTS: Treatment for RSA with AAC showed a mean cost per cured patient of $ 878 pesos. The remaining antibiotics had a higher cost per unit of success, and therefore the results showed that AAC was the best alternative considering this criterion. The therapy that showed a larger percentage of cured patients in RSC was clindamicin; however, the therapeutic alternative with the lowest cost per successful unit was the one based on ciprofloxacin, which dominates gatifloxacin and AAC. CONCLUSIONS: The most cost-effective alternative in the antibiotic treatment of patients with RSA was ACC while for RSC it was ciprofloxacin; sensitivity analysis showed the strength of the base study results.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/administración & dosificación , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Enfermedad Crónica , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Costos de los Medicamentos , Fluoroquinolonas/administración & dosificación , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Gatifloxacina , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/administración & dosificación , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico
8.
Presse Med ; 36(9 Pt 1): 1159-66, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17449219

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous-to-oral switch therapy is strongly recommended in the medical literature. The aim of this study was to assess how we can improve fluoroquinolone switch therapy. METHODS: In this comparative prospective study, we analyzed 243 intravenous ciprofloxacin treatments and assessed the impact of promoting a switch to oral step-down therapy. RESULTS: This study found that switches from intravenous to oral therapy increased, mainly in medical wards, and led to significant savings in direct costs. DISCUSSION: Promoting switch therapy has improved clinical practices in antibiotic use and led to lower direct and probably indirect drug-related costs. CONCLUSION: Our findings will help define the role of switch therapy in improving clinical practices in inpatient antibiotic use.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Administración Oral , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ahorro de Costo , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 6: 72, 2006 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16606473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment regimen and duration of the therapy is still controversial in spinal brucellosis. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, adverse drug reactions, complications and cost of ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin versus doxycycline plus streptomycin in the treatment of spinal brucellosis. METHODS: The patients diagnosed as spinal brucellosis between January 2002 to December 2004 were enrolled into the study. Patients were enrolled into the two antimicrobial therapy groups (doxycycline plus streptomycin vs. ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin) consecutively. For the cost analysis of the two regimens, only the cost of antibiotic therapy was analysed for each patient. RESULTS: During the study period, 31 patients with spinal brucellosis were enrolled into the two antimicrobial therapy groups. Fifteen patients were included in doxycycline plus streptomycin group and 16 patients were included in ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin group. Forty-two levels of spinal column were involved in 31 patients. The most common affected site was lumbar spine (n = 32, 76%) and involvement level was not different in two groups. Despite the disadvantages (older age, more prevalent operation and abscess formation before the therapy) of the patients in the ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin group, the duration of the therapy (median 12 weeks in both groups) and clinical response were not different from the doxycycline plus streptomycin. The cost of ciprofloxacin plus rifampicin therapy was 1.2 fold higher than the cost of doxycycline plus streptomycin therapy. CONCLUSION: Classical regimen (doxycycline plus streptomycin), with the appropriate duration (at least 12 weeks), is still the first line antibiotics and alternative therapies should be considered when adverse drug reactions were observed.


Asunto(s)
Brucelosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Estreptomicina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Doxiciclina/administración & dosificación , Doxiciclina/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Rifampin/administración & dosificación , Rifampin/economía , Columna Vertebral/microbiología , Columna Vertebral/patología , Espondilitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Espondilitis/microbiología , Espondilitis/patología , Estreptomicina/administración & dosificación , Estreptomicina/economía
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 11(8): 1265-73, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16102317

RESUMEN

The increasing prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae has required replacing inexpensive oral ciprofloxacin treatment with more expensive injectable ceftriaxone. Further, monitoring antimicrobial resistance requires culture testing, but nonculture gonorrhea tests are rapidly replacing culture. Since the strategies were similar in effectiveness (> 99%), we evaluated, from the healthcare system perspective, cost-minimizing strategies for both diagnosis (culture followed by antimicrobial susceptibility tests versus nonculture-based tests) and treatment (ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone) of gonorrhea in women. Our results indicate that switching from ciprofloxacin to ceftriaxone is cost-minimizing (i.e., optimal) when the prevalence of gonorrhea is > 3% and prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance is > 5%. Similarly, culture-based testing and susceptibility surveillance are optimal when the prevalence of gonorrhea is < 13%; nonculture-based testing is optimal (cost-minimizing) when gonorrhea prevalence is > or = 13%.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Ceftriaxona/economía , Ceftriaxona/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Gonorrea/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Método de Montecarlo
12.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 5: 48, 2005 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15987523

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite cost containment efforts, parenteral (IV) ciprofloxacin appears to be overutilized at Vancouver General Hospital. In November 2003, the Pharmacist-managed intravenous to oral (IV-PO) Dosage Form Conversion Service was implemented, enabling autonomous pharmacist-initiated dosage form conversion for ciprofloxacin. This study evaluates characteristics of ciprofloxacin use prior to and following implementation of this conversion service. METHODS: This was a single-centre, two-phase (pre/post), unblinded study. Phase I occurred between November 12, 2002 and November 11, 2003 (365 days), and Phase II between November 12, 2003 and March 11, 2004 (120 days). All patients receiving ciprofloxacin IV during these periods were reviewed. The primary endpoint was IV:PO ciprofloxacin use ratio. Secondary endpoints were total number of ciprofloxacin doses, proportion of inappropriate IV ciprofloxacin doses, cost of therapy between phases, and estimated cost avoidance with the intervention. RESULTS: Two hundred ciprofloxacin IV treatment courses were evaluated (100 per phase). The IV:PO ciprofloxacin use ratio was 3.03 (Phase I) vs. 3.48 (Phase II). Total number of doses and ratio of IV to total doses across phases were similar (p = 0.2830). IV-PO ciprofloxacin conversion occurred in 27/100 (27%) of IV courses in Phase I and 23/100 (23%) in Phase II. Proportion of inappropriate ciprofloxacin IV doses decreased between Phases I and II (244/521 (47%) vs. 201/554 (36%) (p = 0.0005), respectively). Furthermore, the proportion of pharmacist-preventable inappropriate ciprofloxacin IV doses was reduced between Phases I and II (114/244 (47%) vs. 65/201 (32%) (p = 0.0026). Proportional cost avoidance associated with total inappropriate IV use was 7,172 Can dollars/16,517 Can dollars (43%) (in Canadian dollars) in Phase I vs. 6,012 Can dollars/17,919 Can dollars (34%) in Phase II (p = 0.001). Similarly, proportional cost avoidance associated with pharmacist-preventable inappropriate IV doses was reduced from 3,367 Can dollars/16,517 Can dollars (20%) in Phase I to 1,975 Can dollars/17,919 Can dollars (11%) in Phase II (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: While overall utilization of ciprofloxacin remained unchanged and the proportion of IV to total doses was stable during the study period, the proportion of inappropriate IV doses and its associated costs appear to have declined subsequent to implementation of a Pharmacist-managed IV-PO Dosage Form Conversion Service. Such a program may be a beneficial adjunct in facilitating appropriate and cost-effective usage of ciprofloxacin.


Asunto(s)
Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colombia Británica , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Desarrollo de Programa , Equivalencia Terapéutica
13.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 55(4): 550-7, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15728141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of a combined intervention strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing at University Hospital Groningen. For the intervention, the antimicrobial treatment guidelines were updated and disseminated in paperback and electronic format. The credibility of the guidelines was improved by consultation with users. In a second phase, academic detailing (AD) was used to improve specific areas of low compliance with the guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prescribing data were prospectively collected for 2869 patients receiving 7471 prescriptions for an antimicrobial for an infection covered by the guidelines between July 2001 and September 2003. After collection of baseline data, the guidelines were actively disseminated in February 2002. Next, after a 5 month interval, a second intervention, i.e. an AD approach, addressed suboptimal prescribing of ciprofloxacin and co-amoxiclav. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyse the interrupted time-series data. RESULTS: At baseline, compliance with the drug choice guidelines was 67%. The first intervention showed a significant change in the level of compliance of +15.5% (95% CI: 8%; 23%). AD did not lead to statistically significant additional changes in already high levels +12.5% (95% CI:-3%; 28%) of compliance. Post-intervention compliance was stable at 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Updating the guidelines in close collaboration with the specialists involved followed by active dissemination proved to be an efficient way to improve compliance with guideline recommendations. An 86% compliance level was achieved in this study without compulsory measures. A ceiling effect may have limited the added value of AD.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales Universitarios , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/economía , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/economía , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Países Bajos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Clin Ther ; 26(10): 1564-77, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15598473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Numerous combination and single-agent antimicrobial regimens are available for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Selection of empiric agents must be directed at providing reliable activity against endotoxin-generating Escherichia coli, other gram-negative facultative bacteria, and anaerobes such as Bacteroides fragilis. Safety profiles, pharmacokinetic profiles, and cost-effectiveness must also be considered. Use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections has recently been advocated. METHODS: We review 2 prospective, comparative clinical trials conducted between 1992 and 2002 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV ciprofloxacin in patients with intra-abdominal infections. Separate pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted for each study are also reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 4 ciprofloxacin studies (2 clinical, 2 pharmacoeconomic) comprise the database. The combination of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was at least as effective as imipenem/cilastatin and clinically more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam therapy, based on clinical success end points. In 1 trial, treatment success for the clinically valid population was reported for 84% (93/111) of patients treated with IV ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, 86% (91/106) of those treated with IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, and 81% of those treated with IV imipenem/cilastatin (91/113). The IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole regimen had a statistically significant lower mean infection-related cost than the IV only ciprofloxacin/metronidazole plus imipenem groups (difference of approximately 1100 US dollars; P = 0.029). In the second clinical trial, clinical resolution rates were statistically different for patients receiving IV/oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (74%) versus IV piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (63%; P = 0.047). Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole was more cost-effective compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (2200 US dollars-3600 US dollars lower cost-effective ratios per patient) regardless of whether the patient had a diagnosis of appendicitis or whether a switch to an oral drug was permissible. CONCLUSIONS: In the studies reviewed herein, the combination of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was an effective and safe regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. This regimen has potential advantages over exclusively IV regimens, including the option of sequential IV/oral therapy, patient convenience, cost savings, and reduced hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Abdominal/microbiología , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hospitalización , Humanos , Peritonitis/microbiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo
15.
Clin Ther ; 26(7): 1168-78, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15336482

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness hreshold of a ciprofloxacin 0.3% and dexamethasone 0.1% (CD) otic suspension relative to olfloxacin otic solution (OFX) for the treatment of acute otitis media in pediatric patients with tympanostomy tubes (AOMT). METHODS: This study used a decision-analytic model to simulate the costs and consequences of the ototopical treatment of AOMT. The AOMT model consisted of 3 tiers of antimicrobial therapy. Each successive tier represented the repeat treatment of clinical failures from the preceding tier. Patients were modeled for treatment until cured or until third-tier therapy was complete, at which time patients were considered cured. First-tier therapy modeled a comparison of CD and OFX using efficacy rates taken from a randomized clinical trial with a population of 599 patients. Second-tier therapy modeled the use of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid using an efficacy rate taken from the medical literature. Third-tier therapy was modeled as being pathogen specific and could follow 1 of 3 possible clinical pathways: (1) PO fluconazole, (2) IM ceftriaxone, or (3) IV antibiotics administered in a hospital setting. Third-tier therapeutic pathway probabilities were based on the microbiologic spectrum of the treatment failures from the clinical trial. Cost information (in year-2003 US dollars) was taken from accepted cost reference sources and presented from the perspective of a third-party payer. The economic outcome of interest was the cost-effectiveness threshold of CD relative to OFX. RESULTS: Given the model parameters, CD had a cost-effectiveness threshold value of 4.5 times the wholesale acquisition cost of OFX. Based on actual cost, first-tier CD therapy was more cost-effective than OFX up to a threshold price of US 152.64 dollars. CONCLUSION: In this decision-analytic model, CD was more cost-effective than OFX for AOMT therapy in pediatric patients up to a threshold price of 4.5 times the price of OFX.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapéutico , Ventilación del Oído Medio/economía , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Otitis Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antibacterianos/economía , Canadá , Niño , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Dexametasona/economía , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Humanos , Ofloxacino/economía , Otitis Media/economía , Otitis Media/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
17.
Eur Urol ; 42(2): 163-6, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12160588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotics are the mainstay for the treatment of men with bacterial prostatitis. Despite numerous treatment strategies involving various types, dosages and duration of antibiotics, no uniform standard has been widely adapted. Moreover, the economic burden of these therapies has been heretofore poorly described. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of various antibiotic treatment regimens for chronic bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: After reviewing the literature, we constructed a model that compared 90 days of double strength trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 14, 28 and 60 days of ciprofloxacin 500 mg. Parameters examined included initial cure rates, relapse rates, total cure rates, pharmaceutical costs, and total cost of treatment. Using a spreadsheet Markov model, we applied cure rates and relapse rates to a hypothetical cohort of 100 men with culture positive chronic bacterial prostatitis. We then calculated cost of medications and total healthcare costs for the various drug regimens. RESULTS: Twice daily ciprofloxacin @ 500 mg for 28 days proved to be the most cost effective treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Yet, after sensitivity analysis, only twice daily ciprofloxacin @ 500 mg for 60 days demonstrated consistent benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole but at a substantially increased cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our model implies that ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 28 days appears to be the most cost effective treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis. Given the limitations of this type of modeling, long term, prospective, comparative trials will provide the most definitive method of evaluating optimal therapy for chronic bacterial prostatitis.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Económicos , Prostatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/economía , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov
18.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 49(5): 875-8, 2002 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12003988

RESUMEN

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess the effectiveness of azithromycin versus a standard regimen with doxycycline/ciprofloxacin in the treatment of sexually transmitted infections in a resource-poor environment. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis was cured in 23/24 (95.8%) of women in the azithromycin arm versus 19/21 (90.5%) in the doxycycline arm (P = 0.6), resulting in three treatment failures. Gonorrhoea was cured in 55/56 (98.2%) women, with one treatment failure in a patient with concomitant C. trachomatis infection. These results indicate that a single oral dose of azithromycin may prove to be a more effective and convenient treatment for sexually transmitted infections in women in a resource-poor environment


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/economía , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Azitromicina/economía , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Doxiciclina/efectos adversos , Doxiciclina/economía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Recursos en Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual/economía , Enfermedades Bacterianas de Transmisión Sexual/microbiología , Sudáfrica , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 58(18): 1740-5, 2001 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11571817

RESUMEN

The abilities of therapeutic interchange (TI) and standard educational tools (SET) to change prescribing habits were compared. We evaluated the replacement of ciprofloxacin with levofloxacin in a four-hospital health system during a 14-month study period. Two hospitals used TI and two SET. The demographics, sites of infection, and severity of illness were analyzed for 554 patients treated at SET hospitals and 1323 patients treated at TI hospitals during a total of 2040 hospitalizations over a 14-month period. In TI hospitals, 97% of patients received levofloxacin, whereas 43% received levofloxacin in SET hospitals (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different for the two groups, although more patients in the SET hospitals received combination antimicrobial therapy. Differences in savings per patient were significant between TI hospitals ($60) and SET hospitals ($37) (p < 0.001). The total annualized savings for all four hospitals was $156,444. TI was more effective than SET in facilitating changes in prescribing patterns in a health care system and resulted in significant cost savings to hospitals and payers.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/economía , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Control de Costos , Ahorro de Costo , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Virginia
20.
Pharmacotherapy ; 21(7 Pt 2): 83S-88S, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11446523

RESUMEN

Economic pressures on the delivery of health care have necessitated a focus on reducing costs and resource utilization while maintaining or improving the quality of care. A growing consensus holds that switching from intravenous to oral therapy is a cost-effective and clinically sound approach for a significantly large group of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Drug utilization studies within the INOVA Health System revealed that levofloxacin is a cost-effective alternative to ciprofloxacin in infectious disease and that use of risk prediction criteria can reduce inappropriate hospitalizations for CAP, thereby reducing costs. In addition, the INOVA experience demonstrates that the strategy used to implement new antibiotic regimens such as switch-therapy regimens is an important factor in cost reduction: a therapeutic interchange mandate is more successful than standard educational techniques in changing treatment patterns.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , APACHE , Administración Oral , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/economía , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ofloxacino/economía , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/economía , Virginia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA