Evaluation of clinical outcomes in an interdisciplinary abdominal pain clinic: A retrospective, exploratory review.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common and well-accepted to be etiologically complex in terms of the contribution of biological, psychological, and social factors to symptom presentations. Nonetheless, despite its documented benefits, interdisciplinary treatment, designed to address all of these factors, for pediatric FGIDs remains rare. The current study hypothesized that the majority of pediatric patients seen in an interdisciplinary abdominal pain clinic (APC) would demonstrate clinical resolution of symptoms during the study period and that specific psychosocial variables would be significantly predictive of GI symptom improvement. AIM: To evaluate outcomes with interdisciplinary treatment in pediatric patients with pain-related FGIDs and identify patient characteristics that predicted clinical outcomes. METHODS: Participants were 392 children, ages 8-18 [M = 13.8; standard deviation (SD) = 2.7], seen between August 1, 2013 and June 15, 2016 in an interdisciplinary APC housed within the Division of Gastroenterology in a medium-sized Midwestern children's hospital. To be eligible, patients had to be 8 years of age or older and have had abdominal pain for ≥ 8 wk at the time of initial evaluation. Medical and psychosocial data collected as part of standard of care were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed in the context of the observational study. Logistic regression was used to model odds of reporting vs never reporting improvement, as well as to differentiate rapid from slower improvers. RESULTS: Nearly 70% of patients followed during the study period achieved resolution on at least one of the employed outcome indices. Among those who achieved resolution during follow up, 43% to 49% did so by the first follow up (i.e., within roughly 2 mo after initial evaluation and initiation of interdisciplinary treatment). Patient age, sleep, ease of relaxation, and depression all significantly predicted the likelihood of resolution. More specifically, the odds of clinical resolution were 14% to 16% lower per additional year of patient age (P < 0.001 to P = 0.016). The odds of resolution were 28% to 42% lower per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase on a pediatric sleep measure (P = 0.006 to P < 0.040). Additionally, odds of clinical resolution were 58% lower per 1-SD increase on parent-reported measure of depression (P = 0.006), and doubled in cases where parents agreed that their children found it easy to relax (P = 0.045). Furthermore, sleep predicted the rapidity of clinical resolution; that is, the odds of achieving resolution by the first follow up visit were 47% to 60% lower per 1-SD increase on the pediatric sleep measure (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Outcomes for youth with FGIDs may be significantly improved by paying specific attention to sleep, ensuring adequate skills for relaxation, and screening of and referral for treatment of comorbid depression.

The Management of Complex Pain in Children Referred to a Pain Clinic at a Tertiary Children's Hospital in Australia.

Synopsis One of the key aspects of good health care for children and young people is the prevention and management of pain. The experience of persistent pain in children and adolescents not only has a major impact on physical, emotional, social, and developmental well-being, but also impacts the broader world, which includes family, school, and social networks. The multidisciplinary pediatric pain clinic adopts a holistic approach to care through a biopsychosocial model. One outcome of an initial pediatric pain clinic review is the creation of a pain management plan that addresses the pharmacological, physical, psychological, and other domains of care. Pediatric pain clinics are improving access by embracing technology through tele-health and internet-based treatment options. Outcome measurement will guide the development of models of care in the future. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(10):806-813. Epub 12 Sep 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7355.

[Territorial resources and access to care in the case of chronic pain]. / Ressources territoriales et accès aux soins en cas de douleur chronique.

To respond to the complexity of the management of patients with chronic pain, an adapted and structured biopsychosocial approach is necessary. Created and managed by committed caregivers, regulated and financed by decision-making bodies, chronic pain assessment and treatment centres form part of the patient care pathway.

Effectiveness of a community based nurse-pharmacist managed pain clinic: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is predominantly managed in primary care, although often ineffectively. There is growing evidence to support the potential role of nurses and pharmacists in the effective management of chronic pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a pain clinic jointly managed by a nurse and pharmacist. DESIGN: A mixed-methods design consisting of qualitative interviews embedded within a quasi-experimental study. SETTINGS: A community-based nurse-pharmacist led pain clinic in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: Adult chronic pain (non-malignant) patients referred to the pain clinic. METHODS: Pain intensity was the primary outcome. Questionnaires (the Brief Pain Inventory, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the SF-36 and the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire) were administered at the baseline, on discharge and at 3-month post-discharge (Brief Pain Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale only). Patient satisfaction was explored using face-to-face, semi-structured qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with a mean age of 46.5 years (SD±14.4) took part in the quasi-experimental study. Thirty-six and nine patients completed the discharge and 3-month follow-up questionnaires respectively. Compared to baseline, statistically significant reductions were noted for two of the outcome measures: pain intensity (P=0.02), and interference of pain with physical functioning (P=0.02) on discharge from the service. Nineteen patients participated in qualitative interviews. The patients were, in general, satisfied with the quality of service. Four contributing factors to patient satisfaction were identified: ample consultation time, in-depth specialised knowledge, listening and understanding to patients' needs, and a holistic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse and pharmacist managed community-based pain clinics can effectively deliver quality pain management services as they offer an interdisciplinary holistic approach to pain management. Such services have the potential not only to reduce the burden on secondary care but also decrease long waiting times for referral to secondary care. Further research is required to support the development of evidence based referral guidelines to such services.

National survey of pain clinics in Croatia: Organization and services.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze organization and therapeutic procedures administered in tertiary outpatient pain clinics in Croatia. METHODS: Data about organization of pain clinics, its personnel, equipment, continuing medical education, therapeutic procedures, research activities and relations with pharmaceutical industry were collected using questionnaires. RESULTS: Twenty-two Croatian pain clinics were included in the study. Most of the pain clinics employ exclusively anesthesiologists and nurses. The most frequently prescribed therapeutic procedures in pain clinics were pharmacotherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture and trigger point injections. Almost all pain clinics provide educational material for patients. Most of the pain clinics have regular interactions with pharmaceutical companies. Prescribing decisions were based mostly on information from scientific meetings, research articles and consultations with colleagues. Information sources which are considered to be the gold standard--the systematic reviews of The Cochrane Collaboration--were used less frequently (n=12; 57%) than advertising materials from pharmaceutical companies (n=16; 76%). Few physicians and other pain clinics staff had scientific degrees or academic titles or were involved in a research project. CONCLUSION: The national study about pain clinics in Croatia pointed out that there is room for improvement of their organization and services. Pain clinics should employ health-care professionals with diverse backgrounds. They should offer treatments backed by the highest-level of scientific evidence. Since pain is a major public health issue, pain clinic staff should engage more in research to contribute to the growing field of pain research, to enhance capacities for pain research in Croatia, to incorporate scientific evidence into their daily decision-making and to enable evidence-based practice.

First steps toward understanding the variability in acute pain service provision and the quality of pain relief in everyday practice across the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Pain management for patients in hospital is a major problem. There is significant variation in care provision. Evidence is needed about the ways in which acute pain services are organized in order to understand whether these are linked to important differences in patient outcomes. The National Inpatient Pain Study group is a voluntary collaborative venture of inpatient pain specialists in the United Kingdom who are working toward establishing a national prospective database of service provision and activity. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this article are (1) to describe current pain service provision and activity (2) to define and monitor the quality and side effects of the primary analgesic techniques, such as central neuraxial block or systemic analgesia, and identify variations in practice. METHODS: Phase 1: Surveys were conducted in two phases during 2010-2011. Information about the organization of services was collected from 121 centers via a live Website. Phase 2: The pilot clinical dataset was collected from 13 hospitals in 2011. RESULTS: Results indicated that staffing varied widely from one to nine nurses per hospital site. Twelve percent of hospitals did not routinely collect data. The main workload was orthopedic and general surgery based on data from 13 hospitals and 29,080 patients in 2011. Thirty-seven percent of patients reported a pain score of moderate to severe pain on the first assessment by the specialist pain team, and 21% reported severe pain. Nausea and vomiting was the most frequent adverse event reported. Sixty-nine major adverse events were logged, of which 64 documented respiratory depression (N = 29,080, 0.22%). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective longitudinal data has the potential to improve our understanding of variation in process and outcome measures and establish future research priorities.

Ozonoterapia en medicina del dolor. Revisión / No disponible

Cada vez se emplea mas el ozono medico en el tratamiento del dolor. Tanto es asi que recientemente el Ministerio de Sanidad espanol ha incluido la ozonoterapia en la cartera de servicios de las unidades de dolor. La efectividad, seguridad y buena tolerabilidad del ozono, tanto infiltrado como administrado por via sistemica, justifican la extension de su uso en los ultimos anos. Debido al escaso conocimiento que en general hay acerca del tema, pretendemos, con esta revision, poner al dia los conocimientos actuales en torno a la ozonoterapia en medicina del dolor (AU)

Increasingly more medical ozone is used in the treatment of pain. So much so that recently the Spanish Ministry of Health has included ozone therapy in the portfolio of pain units. The effectiveness, safety and good tolerability of ozone, infiltrated as well as administered systemically, justify the extent of its use in recent years. Because little is known in general on this subject, the aim of this revision is to update current knowledge about ozone therapy in pain medicine (AU)

Consenso experto sobre el uso clínico de los tratamientos por vía tópica en el manejo del dolor neuropático periférico / No disponible

Objetivo: Proponer a partir del consenso de un panel de expertos de ambito estatal que integre la experiencia clinica y la evidencia disponible mas actual, recomendaciones sobre el uso clinico de los tratamientos por via topica para el manejo del dolor neuropatico periferico (DNP). Métodos: Se proponen, a partir de una revision bibliografica sobre las distintas opciones terapeuticas topicas en DNP, una serie de criterios profesionales y recomendaciones clinicas para la mejora del uso de dichos agentes topicos. Se empleo el metodo Delphi modificado en dos rondas para contrastar las opiniones de un panel nacional de 52 reconocidos expertos, seleccionados mediante una estrategia en “bola de nieve” de entre el colectivo de anestesiologos de unidades del dolor (94 %) y otros especialistas (neurologos y traumatologos). Se evaluaron 61 recomendaciones clinicas agrupadas en 6 areas tematicas: a) DNP: tratamiento topico versus sistemico (11 items); b) dolor neuropatico postquirurgico, postraumatico y munones dolorosos (12 items); c) neuralgia posherpetica, intercostal y del trigemino (9 items); d) DNP por atrapamiento (8 items); e) sindrome de dolor regional complejo (11 items); y f) neuropatia diabetica (ND) y otras polineuropatias (por VIH, alcohol, toxicidad, etc.) (10 items). Se empleo una escala ordinal de tipo Likert de 9 puntos (desacuerdo/ acuerdo) para evaluar cada recomendacion. Tras la primera ronda de encuesta, se facilito al panel informacion del resultado (resultados estadisticos y opiniones libres de los panelistas) y se solicito la reconsideracion del voto sobre los items no consensuados. Resultados: Tras la primera ronda del panel se logró consenso en 37 de las 61 cuestiones planteadas. Al final de la segunda ronda el acuerdo ascendió hasta 46 ítems (75 %). En general, se aprecia consenso entre los expertos sobre la conveniencia de introducir los tratamientos tópicos en primera línea de tratamiento del DNP y sobre su mejor aceptación por los pacientes frente a los sistémicos. Asimismo, fue criterio compartido que la combinación de estos fármacos tópicos con los tratamientos sistémicos es una opción a considerar en el manejo de varios tipos de DNP. También se alcanzó un alto grado de acuerdo en aceptar, desde un punto de vista fisiopatológico, la indicación del tratamiento con parche de capsaicina al 8 % para varios tipos de DNP. Conclusión: Los expertos en el manejo clínico del DNP muestran un elevado nivel de acuerdo profesional con diversas recomendaciones terapéuticas analizadas en el estudio. La difusión de tales recomendaciones puede ayudar a la mejora del manejo rutinario de fármacos tópicos para el dolor neuropático en nuestro sistema sanitario (AU)

Objective: To propose consensus from a panel of state level that integrates clinical experience and the most current evidence, recommendations on the clinical use of topical treatments for the management of peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP). Methods: We propose, based on a literature review on topical therapeutic options in PNP, a series of professional standards and clinical recommendations for improving the use of these topical agents. We used the modified Delphi method in two rounds to contrast the views of a national panel of 52 renowned experts, selected by a “snowball” strategy among the group of anesthesiologists pain units (94 %) and other specialists (neurologist and trauma). We evaluated 61 clinical recommendations grouped into 6 areas: a) PNP systemic versus topical treatment (11 items); b) postsurgical neuropathic pain, post-traumatic and painful stumps (12 items); c) post-herpetic neuralgia, intercostal and trigeminal (9 items); d) PNP entrapment (8 items); e) CRPS (11 items); and f) diabetic neuropathy (DN) and other polyneuropathy (HIV, alcohol, toxicity, etc.) (10 items). We used a Likert- type ordinal scale of 9 points (disagree/agree) to evaluate each recommendation. After the first round of the survey, information was provided requested to reconsider the vote on itemsnot agree. Results: After the first round the panel consensus was achieved in 37 of the 61 issues raised. At the end of the second round of the agreement amounted to 46 (75 %). In general, there was consensus among experts on whether to introduce topical treatment in first line treatment of PNP and its greater acceptance by patients compared with systemic. He was also a shared view consider in the management of various types of PNP. Also reached a high level of agreement to accept, from a physiological point of view, the indication for treatment with capsaicin patch 8 % for various types of PNP. Conclusions: Experts in the clinical management of PNP show a high level of professional agreement with various therapeutic recommendations for study. The dissemination of such recommendations can help improving the routine management of topical drugs for neuropathic pain in our health system (AU)

[Integrated headache care network. Kiel Migraine and Headache Center and German National Headache Treatment Network]. / Sektorenübergreifende schmerzmedizinische Versorgung. Schmerzklinik Kiel und bundesweites Kopfschmerzbehandlungsnetz.

Migraine and other headaches affect 54 million people in Germany. They rank among the ten most severely disabling complaints and the three most expensive neurological disorders. Nevertheless, they are not adequately recognized in the healthcare system with sketchy diagnoses and inadequate treatment. This inadequate care is not primarily due to a lack of medical and scientific knowledge on the development and treatment of headaches but is predominantly due to organizational deficits in the healthcare system and in the implementation of current knowledge. To overcome the organizational barriers the national headache treatment network was initiated in Germany. For the first time it allows national cross-sectoral and multidisciplinary links between inpatient and outpatient care. A hand in hand treatment programme, better education, better information exchange between all partners and combined efforts using clearly defined treatment pathways and goals are the basis for state of the art and efficient treatment results. The treatment network is geared towards the specialized treatment of severely affected patients with chronic headache disorders. A national network of outpatient and inpatient pain therapists in both practices and hospitals works hand in hand to optimally alleviate pain in a comprehensive cross-sectoral and multidisciplinary manner. For therapy refractive disorders, a high-intensive supraregional fully inpatient treatment can be arranged. This concept offers for the first time a nationwide coordinated treatment without limitation by specialization and bureaucratic remuneration sectors.

[Intersectoral pain treatment. The Algesiologikum group]. / Sektorübergreifende schmerzmedizinische Versorgung. Der Algesiologikum-Verbund.

Cross-sectoral clinical pathways for chronic pain patients in standard and routine care are a major challenge for the German healthcare system. The Algesiologikum group has developed such clinical pathways including an essential infrastructure. Cooperation partners of the Algesiologikum group are two outpatient medical care units, one neurosurgery practice and four hospitals. In the outpatient sector as well as in the inpatient sector the Algesiologikum group provides a multidisciplinary team caring for chronic pain patients. The range of treatment in the hospitals includes multimodal, invasive and surgical pain therapy. The present report illustrates possibilities and frontiers of the Algesiologikum concept based on all patients treated since 2009.

Clinical outcome of a headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program and adherence to treatment recommendations in a tertiary headache center: an observational study.

This study investigated the outcome of a 5-day headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program (MTP) and the adherence to treatment recommendations in 295 prospectively recruited consecutive headache patients [210 migraine, 17 tension-type headache (TTH), 68 combination headache, including 56 medication-overuse headache (MOH)]. Headache frequency decreased from 13.4 (±8.8) to 8.8 (±8.0) days per month after 12-18 months. Forty-three percent of the participants fulfilled the primary outcome (reduction of headache frequency of ≥50%), which was less likely in patients with combination of migraine and TTH compared to migraine (OR = 3.136, p = 0.002) or TTH (OR = 1.029, n.s.). Increasing number of headache days per month (OR = 1.092, p ≤ 0.0001) and adherence to lifestyle modifications (OR = 1.269, p = 0.004) predicted primary outcome. 51 of 56 MOH patients were treated successfully. Thirty-five percent of the patients were adherent to pharmacological prophylaxis, 61% to relaxation therapy, and 72% to aerobic endurance sports. MTP is effective in headache treatment. Adherence to therapy was associated with better outcome.

System plasticity and integrated care: informed consumers guide clinical reorientation and system reorganization.

SETTING: Two Australian public hospital multidisciplinary pain centers (MPCs) situated on opposite sides of the country. OBJECTIVE: Restructuring our services to become patient-centred and patient-driven by enabling entry to our MPCs through an education portal, inclusive of both knowledge and self-management skills, and to then be free to select particular treatment options on the basis of evidence of known efficacy (risk/benefit). DESIGN: Group-based education to inform our patients of the current state of uncertainty that exists in Pain Medicine, both in regard to diagnostic and therapeutic practices. Using an interprofessional team approach, we aimed to present practical and evidence-based advice on techniques of pain self-management and existing traditional medical options. RESULTS: Early, resource efficient, group intervention provides many patients with sufficient information to make informed decisions and enables them to partner us in engaging a whole person approach to their care. We have implemented routine comprehensive audits of clinical services to better inform the planning and provision of health care across health services. CONCLUSIONS: System plasticity is as important to the process of integrated health care as it is to our understanding of the complexity of the lived experience of pain. Better-informed consumers partnered with responsive health professionals drive the proposed paradigm shift in service delivery. The changes better align the needs of consumers with the ability of health care providers to meet them, thus achieving the twin goals of patient empowerment and system efficiency.

[Assessment of the efficiency of the clinical management of neuropathic pain in specialist clinics compared to general clinics in neurology health care units in Spain]. / Evaluación de la eficiencia del manejo clínico del dolor neuropático en consultas especializadas frente a consultas generales en unidades asistenciales de neurología en España.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the cost-consequences of chronic neuropathic pain (NeP) outpatients care comparing management in general clinics (GC) versus specialised pain clinics (SPC) in neurology settings in Spain. METHODS: A 6-month retrospective, cross-sectional, comparative observational study including NeP subjects was designed. Sociodemographics and clinical characteristics of subjects along with pain-related healthcare and non healthcare resources utilization were recorded. Lost-work-days equivalent missed as a consequence of pain were also collected to compute indirect costs. Costs to society were calculated in euros for the year 2008. Severity and interference of pain were used for the main effectiveness evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (53% in SPC), 56.8% women, and 59.3+/-14.7 years were included. Patients were allocated according to usual administrative procedures in each participant centre, consecutively and independently of the diagnosis and clinical status of patients. Yearly indirect costs were euro1,299+/-2,804 in SPC compared to euro1,483+/-3,452 in GC (p=0.660), while annual direct costs were, euro2,911+/-3,335 and euro3,563+/-4,797, respectively (p=0.239), with total costs of euro4,210+/-4,654 and euro5,060+/-6,250, respectively (p=0.249). Mean pain severity at the time of evaluation was 3.8+/-2.3 in subjects in SPC vs. 5.2+/-2 in GC (p<0.001), while the average interference of pain on daily activities were 3.3+/-2 and 4.7+/-2.5, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In neurology settings in Spain, the outpatient clinical management of chronic NeP in SPC was a dominant alternative compared with GC healthcare, since it has shown better patients healthcare outcomes with less severity and interference of pain on daily activities, while maintaining a similar level of costs. These results could help health decision makers when planning the use of health care resources.

Setting up an acupuncture knee clinic under Practice Based Commissioning.

This paper outlines the setting up of a new service in primary care offering acupuncture to patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee. The high volume clinic is funded under the Practice Based Commissioning initiative and is the first of its type in the UK. It appears to offer a model for similar services elsewhere.

Multidisciplinary treatment for headache in the Canadian healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary treatment programs are seen as an effective way to treat patients with chronic illness. The purpose of this study was to describe a multidisciplinary headache program which was developed in the Canadian public healthcare setting, and to report on patient perceptions of the program and patient treatment outcomes. METHODS: The Calgary Headache Assessment and Management Program (CHAMP) was developed with initial funding from Alberta Health, and continued with function from the Calgary Health Region. Patient perceptions of the program were obtained with questionnaires. Outcome measures for a cohort of patients who completed the Self-Management Workshop were obtained using standard headache related disability measures. RESULTS: Patient perceptions of the education session, the Lifestyle Assessment, and the Self-Management Workshop were very positive. Headache Disability Inventory scores fell from 56.2 to 46.3 from baseline to three months post Self-Management Workshop (p < .001). Corresponding scores for the HIT-6 were 63.6 and 58.2 (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary headache treatment programs can be developed in the Canadian public healthcare system. The program described here was well accepted by many patients and perceived to be useful by them. Headache related disability as measured by standard measures was significantly reduced after participation in the program.

[Pain clinics within Austrian hospitals, for patients with pathologies of the locomotor system. Analysis of care and comparison with Germany]. / Schmerztherapeutische Einrichtungen für Erkrankungen des Bewegungssystems an österreichischen Krankenanstalten. Versorgungsanalyse und Vergleich mit Deutschland.

This paper gives a comparative overview of the current clinical care of patients experiencing pain in the musculoskeletal system in Austria and in Germany. The questionnaire used in this study was modified from one used in a survey carried out in Germany in 2002. In our version we asked specifically about pain in the musculoskeletal system. In all 228 health care facilities were reviewed, 56.6% of which offer at least one option for pain therapy. In Austria, the majority of patients with pain in the musculoskeletal system are treated by specialists in the departments of anaesthesiology, internal medicine, and orthopaedics. In 17.4% of the clinics in Austria there are plans to extend the pain therapy they offer, but in over half of the hospitals that responded facilities for pain therapy are considered to be vulnerable. The study highlights a significant higher percentage of in-patient pain therapy services in Austria, while in Germany, in contrast, there are more outpatient options for pain therapy. The quality of pain therapy could by further improved by more intense cooperation between the inpatient and outpatient sectors and by the establishment of interdisciplinary and multimodal solutions.