Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 164
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Public Health ; 10: 894330, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910911

RESUMEN

Background: Enrollment in sub-national social health insurance schemes (SSHIS) can be challenging in developing countries like Nigeria, particularly among people in the informal sector. This could be due to a lack of knowledge on its mode of operation and benefits, distrust in government, inimical religious and traditional beliefs, as well as constraining economic factors. A complementary and innovative financing strategy such as the philanthropist adoption model (ADM) could be beneficial in improving SSHIS coverage and financial resources among persons in the informal sector. The study provides new evidence on how ADM influenced health insurance coverage and resources within SSHIS among informal settings in Nigeria. It also highlights contextual factors influencing the implementation of ADM. Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods case-study approach undertaken in Anambra State, Southeast Nigeria. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (n = 14), document review (n = 12), and quantitative (enrollment data) methods. The respondents were purposively selected based on their involvement with the implementation of the SSHIS. Data analysis for qualitative data was done using the manual thematic framework approach while descriptive analysis was performed for the quantitative data. Results: The implementation of ADM was a valuable and effective strategy for improving knowledge, coverage, and resource mobilization (annual premium pool) within the SSHIS in the informal sector. The main enablers of the implementation of ADM include strong political will and commitment, wider stakeholders' consultation and collaboration, numerous public-spirited philanthropists, and legal institutionalization of health insurance. Other enablers include organizational factors like good teamwork among Anambra State Health Insurance Agency (ASHIA) staff, enabling work environment (incentives, supervision, office space), and experienced marketers in the agency. However, ADM had several barriers that affected its implementation-acceptability issues due to distrust for government and the health system, health systems barriers including substandard health facilities and equipment, and inimical cultural and religious beliefs about health insurance. Conclusion: The study demonstrates a case for the implementation of innovative ADM as a strategy for enhancing SSHIS financial sustainability and coverage of persons in the informal sector. Hence, the strategy should be adopted in settings where philanthropy abounds for increasing access to quality healthcare delivery to poor beneficiaries toward achieving universal health coverage in developing countries.


Asunto(s)
Sector Informal , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Nigeria , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud
2.
Surgery ; 171(1): 140-146, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize the association between differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patient insurance status and appropriateness of therapy (AOT) regarding extent of thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for DTC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for AOT, as defined by the American Thyroid Association guidelines, and hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) were calculated. A difference-in-differences (DD) analysis examined the association of Medicaid expansion with outcomes for low-income patients aged <65. RESULTS: A total of 224,500 patients were included. Medicaid and uninsured patients were at increased risk of undergoing inappropriate therapy, including inappropriate lobectomy (Medicaid 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.54; uninsured 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60), and under-treatment with RAI (Medicaid 1.20, 95% CI: 1.14-1.26; uninsured 1.44, 95% CI: 1.33-1.55). Inappropriate lobectomy (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.7-2.3, P < .001) and under-treatment with RAI (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 2.2-2.5, P < .001) were independently associated with decreased survival, while appropriate surgical resection (HR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.3-0.3, P < .001) was associated with improved odds of survival; the model controlled for all relevant clinico-pathologic variables. No difference in AOT was observed in Medicaid expansion versus non-expansion states with respect to surgery or adjuvant RAI therapy. CONCLUSION: Medicaid and uninsured patients are at significantly increased odds of receiving inappropriate treatment for DTC; both groups are at a survival disadvantage compared with Medicare and those privately insured.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Tiroidectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/economía , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/mortalidad , Tiroidectomía/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Urol ; 205(1): 115-121, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658588

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Optimal treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer remains unclear. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines recommend active surveillance, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Recent trials demonstrated no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer compared to prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The use of active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer is less clear. In this study we characterize U.S. national trends for demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with active surveillance for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 176,122 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate risk prostate cancer and association with the use of active surveillance were characterized. The analysis was performed in April 2020. RESULTS: In total, 176,122 men were identified with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these men 57.3% underwent prostatectomy, 36.4% underwent radiotherapy and 3.2% underwent active surveillance. Active surveillance nearly tripled from 1.6% in 2010 to 4.6% in 2016 (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis use of active surveillance was associated with older age, diagnosis in recent years, lower Gleason score and tumor stage, type of insurance, treatment at an academic center and proximity to facility, and attaining higher education (p <0.05). Race and comorbidities were not associated with active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight increasing active surveillance use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer demonstrating clinical and socioeconomic disparities. Prospective data and improved risk stratification are needed to guide optimal treatment for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Espera Vigilante/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calicreínas/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía/economía , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioterapia/economía , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Espera Vigilante/economía
4.
J Altern Complement Med ; 26(10): 966-969, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640831

RESUMEN

Introduction: Complementary health care professionals deliver a substantial component of clinical services in the United States, but insurance coverage for many such services may be inadequate. The objective of this project was to follow up on an earlier single-year study with an evaluation of trends in reimbursement for complementary health care services over a 7-year period. Methods: The authors employed a retrospective serial cross-sectional design to analyze health insurance claims for services provided by licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, and naturopaths in New Hampshire (NH) from 2011 to 2017. They restricted the analyses to claims in nonemergent outpatient settings for Current Procedural Terminology code 99213, which is one of the most commonly used clinical procedure codes across all specialties. They evaluated by year the likelihood of reimbursement, as compared with primary care physicians as the gold standard. A generalized estimating equation model was used to account for within-person correlations among the separate claim reimbursement indicators for individuals used in the analysis, using an exchangeable working covariance structure among claims for the same individual. Reimbursement was defined as payment >0 dollars. Results: The total number of clinical services claimed was 26,725 for acupuncture, 8317 for naturopathic medicine, 2,539,144 for chiropractic, and 1,860,271 for primary care. Initially, likelihood of reimbursement for naturopathic physicians was higher relative to primary care physicians, but was lower from 2014 onward. Odds of reimbursement for both acupuncture and chiropractic claims remained lower throughout the study period. In 2017, as compared with primary care the likelihood of reimbursement was 77% lower for acupuncturists, 72% lower for chiropractors, and 64% lower for naturopaths. Conclusion: The likelihood of reimbursement for complementary health care services is significantly lower than that for primary care physicians in NH. Lack of insurance coverage may result in reduced patient access to such services.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Honorarios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 65: 100-106, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current reimbursement policy surrounding telemedicine has been cited as a barrier for the adaptation of this care model. The objective of this study is to analyze the reimbursement figures for outpatient telemedicine consultation in vascular surgery. METHODS: Patients first underwent synchronous telemedicine visits after receiving point-of-care ultrasound at one of 3 satellite locations of Henry Ford Health System in Michigan. Visit types included new, return, and postoperative patients. Reimbursement information related to payor, adjustment, denial, paid and outstanding balances were recorded for each telemedicine visit. Then, using an enterprise data warehouse, a retrospective analysis was performed for the aforementioned telemedicine visits. The data were analyzed to determine the outcome of total billed charges, number of denied claims, reimbursement per payor, reimbursement per patient, and out-of-pocket costs to the patients. RESULTS: Among 184 virtual clinical encounters, the payors included Aetna US Healthcare, Blue Advantage, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cofinity Plan, Health Alliance Plan, HAP Medicare Advantage, Humana Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, Medicare, Molina Medicaid HMO, United Healthcare, Blue Care Network, Aetna Better Health of Michigan, Priority Health, and self-pay. Among the 15 payors, reimbursement ranged from 0% to 67% of the total charges billed. Among the 184 virtual visits, a grand total of $22,145 was collected or an average of $120.35 per virtual encounter. The breakdown of charges billed was 40% adjusted, 41% paid by insurance, 10% paid by patient, and 13% denied. There were 27 total denials (15%). Denial of payment included telehealth and nontelehealth reasons, citing noncovered charges, payment included for other prior services, new patient quality not met, and not covered by payor. The average out-of-pocket cost to patients was $12.59 per visit. CONCLUSIONS: These reimbursement data validate the economic potential within this new platform of healthcare delivery. As our experience with the business model grows, we expect to see an increase in reimbursement from private payors and acceptance from patients. Within a tertiary care system, telemedicine for chronic vascular disease has proven to be a viable means to reach a broader population base, and without significant cost to the patients.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Precios de Hospital , Costos de Hospital , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Consulta Remota/economía , Ultrasonografía/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Michigan , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Pain Med ; 20(10): 2060-2068, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329938

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In response to the national opioid crisis, governmental and medical organizations have called for broader insurance coverage of acupuncture to improve access to nonpharmacologic pain therapies, especially in cancer populations, where undertreatment of pain is prevalent. We evaluated whether cancer patients would be willing to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients with pain at one academic center and 11 community hospitals. METHODS: We used logistic regression models to examine factors associated with willingness to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. RESULTS: Among 634 cancer patients, 304 (47.9%) reported willingness to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. In univariate analyses, patients were more likely to report willingness if they had severe pain (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-2.45) but were less likely if they were nonwhite (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.90) or had only received high school education or less (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.32-0.65). After adjusting for attitudes and beliefs in multivariable analyses, willingness was no longer significantly associated with education (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.50-1.21) and was more negatively associated with nonwhite race (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.29-0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in two cancer patients was willing to use insurance-covered acupuncture for pain. Willingness was influenced by patients' attitudes and beliefs, which are potentially modifiable through counseling and education. Further research on racial disparities is needed to close the gap in utilization as acupuncture is integrated into insurance plans in response to the opioid crisis.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Acupuntura , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/economía , Adulto , Dolor en Cáncer/economía , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Value Health ; 22(7): 762-767, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31277821

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between cancer history and cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN) as well as cost-coping strategies, by health insurance coverage. METHODS: We used the 2013 to 2016 National Health Interview Survey to identify adults aged 18 to 64 years with (n = 3599) and without (n = 56 909) a cancer history. Cost-related changes in medication use included (1) CRN, measured as skipping, taking less, or delaying medication because of cost, and (2) cost-coping strategies, measured as requesting lower cost medication or using alternative therapies to save money. Separate multivariable logistic regressions were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of CRN and cost-coping strategies associated with cancer history, stratified by insurance. RESULTS: Cancer survivors were more likely than adults without a cancer history to report CRN (AOR 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.43) and cost-coping strategies (AOR 1.10; 95% CI 0.99-1.19). Among the privately insured, the difference in CRN by cancer history was the greatest among those enrolled in high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) without health savings accounts (HSAs) (AOR 1.78; 95% CI 1.30-2.44). Among adults with HDHP and HSA, cancer survivors were less likely to report cost-coping strategies (AOR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42-0.90). Regardless of cancer history, CRN and cost-coping strategies were the highest for those uninsured, enrolled in HDHP without HSA, and without prescription drug coverage under their health plan (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors are prone to CRN and more likely to use cost-coping strategies. Expanding options for health insurance coverage, use of HSAs for those with HDHP, and enhanced prescription drug coverage may effectively address CRN.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Gastos en Salud , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Ahorro de Costo , Deducibles y Coseguros/economía , Sustitución de Medicamentos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Ahorros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(9): 1910-1912, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31243710

RESUMEN

Despite improved knowledge about the benefits and harms of treatments for chronic back pain in the past several decades, there is a large and consequential mismatch between treatments found safe and effective and those routinely covered by health insurance. As a result, care for back pain has, if anything, deteriorated in recent decades-expenses are higher, harms are greater, and use of ineffective treatments is more common. Deficiencies in health care delivery processes and payment models are centrally involved in the failure to improve care for back pain. A key step for accelerating progress is changing insurance coverage policies to facilitate use of the safest and most helpful approaches while discouraging riskier and less effective treatments. Relatively simple changes in reimbursement policies may minimize harm and improve quality of life for many patients with chronic back and similar pain syndromes. Such changes might also reduce health care expenditures because the costs of treatments currently covered by insurance and their associated harms may well outweigh the costs of the relatively safe and effective treatments recommended by current guidelines but poorly covered by insurance. There is no justification for continuing the status quo-patients and clinicians deserve better.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Terapia por Acupuntura/economía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Atención Plena/economía , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía
9.
Healthc Policy ; 15(2): 72-84, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077846

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Of the several barriers associated with uptake and adherence to hearing services, cost is the most commonly identified barrier in Canada. This study evaluated health insurance plans for hearing care coverage within Alberta, Canada, and subsequent out-of-pocket expenses that would result if an individual chose to pursue treatment. METHODS: An investigation of eight companies that provide supplementary health coverage in Alberta was conducted. Categories of health service coverage included hearing, vision, speech-language pathology (S-LP), physical therapy related (PT-R; including massage therapy and chiropractic therapy) and alternative medicine related (AM-R; including osteopathy, acupuncture and naturopathy). All coverage amounts were corrected to a four-year term for comparison purposes. RESULTS: For a four-year term, the coverage amounts for hearing services were CAD 300-750; for vision services were CAD 0-900; for S-LP services were CAD 0-2,400; for PT-R services were CAD 1,400-10,200; and for AM-R services were CAD 0-10,200 per four-year term. The expected out-of-pocket expense for vision ranged from CAD 0 to CAD 2,766, whereas for hearing, it ranged from CAD 250 to CAD 11,700. CONCLUSION: A considerable range and discrepancy were reported between hearing care and most paramedical services. In addition, the coverage amounts for hearing care were inconsistent with treatment costs, resulting in considerable out-of-pocket expenses for most consumers. The potential implications of such cost-related barriers on public health are an important consideration as our understanding of the impact of untreated hearing impairment continues to increase.


Asunto(s)
Anteojos/economía , Anteojos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Audífonos/economía , Audífonos/provisión & distribución , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Alberta , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
10.
Rural Remote Health ; 18(4): 4804, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30578728

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to review the change of supplied amount of oral pit and fissure sealing (PFS) in urban and rural areas of South Korea after including PFS into the list of treatments covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI), and to check whether there is a difference in supplied amount in areas where the dental treatment accessibility is different based on the data of the Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES). METHODS: The KNHANES data year used for 'before coverage' was 2007, and that of 'after coverage' was 2012. Data analysis was done using STATA software. RESULTS: Areas were classified as urban or rural. Reduction of out-of-pocket expenses, according to the NHI coverage PFS experience of children aged 6-14 years, increased from 28.7% before coverage to 34.9% after coverage. PFS experience of children aged 6-14 years in the urban area was increased from 29.2% before coverage to 35.6% after coverage. The increase in rural areas was from 27.2% before coverage to 31.5% after coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Although PFS supplying was increased after inclusion in NHI coverage, it is still insufficient to reduce the decayed, missing, filled teeth index effectively. To reduce inequality, supply of PFS in rural area by community oral health program should be strengthened. And also, waiving out-of-pocket money for PFS in NHI should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Salud Bucal/economía , Selladores de Fosas y Fisuras/economía , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Salud Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Selladores de Fosas y Fisuras/uso terapéutico , República de Corea
11.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 53(4): 342-348, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30119787

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our prior study revealed significantly lower use of eye care providers in Newfoundland and Labrador (NFLD). This study reports factors associated with this low use and related vision health outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 14 925 Caucasian respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey - Healthy Aging 2008/2009 aged ≥65 years. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using self-reported survey data. RESULTS: NFLD, along with 3 other provinces, does not insure seniors for routine eye examinations. Among seniors without self-reported glaucoma, cataracts, and diabetes, the use of eye care providers in NFLD (36.3%) is the lowest compared with provinces with (50.7%, p < 0.05) and without (42.2%, p > 0.05) government-insured eye examinations. Among seniors with known eye disease insured for eye care in all provinces, eye care utilisation in NFLD (63.1%) is still the lowest across all provinces (69.4%-71.3%, p > 0.05). Compared with the national average, NFLD seniors have significantly higher proportions of low income (61.7% vs 47.4%), no postsecondary education (53.6% vs 42.2%), and rural residency (40.6% vs 18.9%). These factors are all associated with low levels of eye care utilisation. Compared with insured provinces, NFLD has a significantly lower prevalence of self-reported cataracts (16.7% vs 23.1) and glaucoma (3.8% vs 7.0%), and a slightly higher prevalence of presenting visual impairment (4.0% vs 3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of government insurance, low socioeconomic status, and living in nonurbanised areas all contribute to the underutilisation of eye care providers in NFLD. This underutilisation appears to be associated with reduced detection of eye diseases.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Oftalmología/organización & administración , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos de la Visión/terapia , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Terranova y Labrador , Trastornos de la Visión/economía
12.
Am J Manag Care ; 24(8 Spec No.): SP273-SP278, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30020739

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The use of medical foods (MFs) specifically for non-inborn errors of metabolism (non-IEM) is rising. Concomitantly, evidence for the safety and efficacy of these non-IEM MFs is lacking. We examined the current use and costs of non-IEM MFs and determined whether the scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness and medical utility is adequate to warrant public reimbursement. STUDY DESIGN: We employed a qualitative literature review analysis. METHODS: PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for all years using relevant keywords, including names of non-IEM MFs identified in the California Workers' Compensation System (CAWCS) claims dataset from 2011 to 2013. The quality of extracted data was scored with the Delfini Evidence Tool Kit. RESULTS: Only 2 (3.2%) of 62 studies were conducted with scientific rigor. These 2 studies were for dietary management of Alzheimer disease, which does not have a distinctive nutritional requirement necessitating an MF. Seventy-one percent of the studies of MFs used by patients in the CAWCS were considered to have uncertain validity. CONCLUSIONS: Most reviewed non-IEM MFs lack evidence to support their safety and efficacy. These non-IEM MFs do not abide by FDA draft guidance, as they do not address a distinct nutritional requirement for a disease and yet often have a National Drug Code or "Rx only" label. Consequently, these products do not meet the statutory definition of an MF. We recommend that CAWCS and other payers not provide insurance coverage for non-IEM MFs until more scientific evidence supports their safety, efficacy, and use for nutritional need of a disease.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Suplementos Dietéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Síndrome Metabólico/dietoterapia , Valor Nutritivo , Catequina , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/diagnóstico , Investigación Cualitativa
13.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 14(5): 881-884, 2018 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29735000

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Value, like beauty, exists in the eye of the beholder. This article places the value of clinical sleep medicine services in historical context and presents a vision for the value-based sleep of the future. First, the history of value and payment in sleep medicine is reviewed from the early days of the field, to innovative disruption, to the widespread adoption of home sleep apnea testing. Next, the importance of economic perspective is discussed, with emphasis on cost containment and cost-shifting between payers, employers, providers, and patients. Specific recommendations are made for sleep medicine providers and the field at large to maximize the perceived value of sleep. Finally, alternate payment models and value-based care are presented, with an eye toward the future for clinical service providers as well as integrated health delivery networks.


Asunto(s)
Medicina del Sueño/economía , Control de Costos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Medicina del Sueño/métodos
14.
Orv Hetil ; 159(17): 682-687, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29681174

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The aim of our study was to analyse the public price of the montelukast sodium therapy in Hungary. METHOD: Data derived from the nationwide pharmaceutical database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration. We observed the turnover and price of the medicaments containing the active substance montelukast sodium from 2007 to 2015. Accordingly, our indicators were: consumer price, DCT (daily cost of therapy), co-payment, quasi co-payment, DOT (days of treatment). RESULTS: Due to the increasing DOT, the total amount of the public price paid by the patients increased until 2011, reaching the amount of 1 million USD; then, due to the generic competition and the blind bid methods, it decreased to 490 000 USD. The total amount of the public price of the brand-name Singulair moved to the generics during 3 years (2011-2014). The DCT of the originator Singulair 10 mg tablets decreased from 1.1 USD to 0.34 USD; the DCT of the generic product Montelukast TEVA decreased from 0.67 USD to 0.16 USD in the period under review. CONCLUSION: Due to the generic competition, the patients' access to drugs containing montelukast sodium increased significantly: the DOT increased, the co-payment decreased. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(17): 682-687.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/economía , Antiasmáticos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Sustitución de Medicamentos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Quinolinas/economía , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Ciclopropanos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Económica , Humanos , Hungría , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Servicios Farmacéuticos/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfuros
15.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0190911, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338032

RESUMEN

This study's objective is to provide an alternative explanation for the low enrolment in health insurance in Ghana by analysing differences in perceptions between the insured and uninsured of the non-technical quality of healthcare. It further explores the association between insurance status and perception of healthcare quality to ascertain whether insurance status matters in the perception of healthcare quality. Data from a survey of 1,903 households living in the catchment area of 64 health centres were used for the analysis. Two sample independent t-tests were employed to compare the average perceptions of the insured and uninsured on seven indicators of non-technical quality of healthcare. A generalised ordered logit regression, controlling for socio-economic characteristics and clustering at the health facility level, tested the association between insurance status and perceived quality of healthcare. The perceptions of the insured were found to be significantly more negative than the uninsured and those of the previously insured were significantly more negative than the never insured. Being insured was associated with a significantly lower perception of healthcare quality. Thus, once people are insured, they tend to perceive the quality of healthcare they receive as poor compared to those without insurance. This study demonstrated that health insurance status matters in the perceptions of healthcare quality. The findings also imply that perceptions of healthcare quality may be shaped by individual experiences at the health facilities, where the insured and uninsured may be treated differently. Health insurance then becomes less attractive due to the poor perception of the healthcare quality provided to individuals with insurance, resulting in low demand for health insurance in Ghana. Policy makers in Ghana should consider redesigning, reorganizing, and reengineering the National Healthcare Insurance Scheme to ensure the provision of better quality healthcare for both the insured and uninsured.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Ghana , Política de Salud/economía , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Percepción , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
16.
Int J Health Econ Manag ; 17(4): 453-471, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560648

RESUMEN

The empirical evidence about the effect of smoking on health care cost coverage is not consistent with the expectations based on the notion of adverse selection. This evidence is mostly based on correlational studies which cannot isolate the adverse selection effect from the moral hazard effect. Exploiting data from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe, this study uses an instrumental variable strategy to identify the causal effect of daily smoking on perceived health care cost coverage of those at age 50 or above in 12 European countries. Daily smoking is instrumented by a variable indicating whether or not there is any other daily smoker in the household. A self-assessment of health care cost coverage is used as the outcome measure. Among those who live with a partner (72% of the sample), the result is not statistically significant which means we find no effect of smoking on perceived health care cost coverage. However, among those who live without a partner, the results show that daily smokers have lower self-assessed perceived health care cost coverage. This finding replicates the same counter-intuitive relationship between smoking and health insurance presented in previous studies, but in a language of causality. In addition to this, we contribute to previous studies by a cross-country comparison which brings in different institutional arrangements, and by using the self-assessed perceived health care cost coverage which is broader than health insurance coverage.


Asunto(s)
Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Fumar/economía , Fumar/psicología , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Comparación Transcultural , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos
17.
Klin Padiatr ; 229(3): 168-174, 2017 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28464188

RESUMEN

Background Due to their rarity studies in (ultra-) rare diseases are difficult. Only for a minority of these diseases causal therapies are available. Development and production of enzyme replacement therapies (ERT) for example are challenging and expensive. The number of patients is low, costs per patient are high. We will focus on the challenges of providing long-term ERT to patients with lysosomal storage diseases (LSD) in an out- and inpatient setting based on a literature search in Pubmed and own experience. Many ERTs for LSDs have a positive cost-benefit ratio. Possible side-effects are severe allergic reactions. ERT is covered by the insurance companies when prescribed by a physician, however they are liable to recourse by the insurance company as the expenses for drugs of the prescribing physician will be above average. In most cases the recourse can be averted if diagnoses of individual patients are disclosed. Intravenous infusion of ERT is not well-regulated in Germany/Austria. Infusion on a ward is safe however often not covered by the insurance companies as patients do not stay overnight. Another option is infusion in a day-care setting, however the lump sum paid for infusion does not cover costs for ERT. On an individual basis, reimbursement for medication (ERT) has to be negotiated with the insurance companies before infusion takes place. Home infusions are feasible, however careful evaluations of the infusion-team and the risk for side-effects have to be performed on an individual basis, legal issues have to be considered. In- and outpatient ERT of patients with LSDs is challenging but feasible after individual evaluation of patient and infusion team.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/terapia , Niño , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo Enzimático/economía , Alemania , Terapia de Infusión a Domicilio/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/diagnóstico , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/economía , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/enzimología , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Factores de Riesgo
19.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 109(5)2017 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376233

RESUMEN

In 1998, the passage of the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act required insurance health plans nationwide covering breast cancer treatments to also reimburse for subsequent breast reconstructive surgery and prostheses. In response to low utilization of breast reconstructive services, particularly among racial minorities, plastic surgery interest groups successfully advocated for the passage of the Breast Cancer Patient Education Act, which provides a timely opportunity to reconsider patient accessibility to other equally important quality of life issues for cancer survivors. Currently, the potential threat of infertility as a consequence of cancer therapy does not meet preexisting definitions of infertility, making preemptive fertility preservation elective. Ultimately, cost remains the largest barrier to the pursuit of fertility preservation. In this Commentary, we estimate the potential additive cost of providing fertility preservation coverage for approximately 19 000 eligible women of reproductive age diagnosed with breast cancer based on previously published prevalence and cost data. We determine an upper limit of yearly cost of $126.6 million US dollars assuming 100% participation. Legislation providing mandatory insurance coverage of breast reconstruction surgeries in all 50 states following cancer treatment represents a powerful policy commitment to address existing health disparities in reproductive health services and ensures comprehensive cancer survivorship care. Extending coverage for fertility preservation in the setting of fertility-threatening treatment offers a consistent stance for insurance coverage of iatrogenic sequelae of cancer therapy at a fraction of the cost of breast reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Preservación de la Fertilidad/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estados Unidos
20.
J Pediatr ; 182: 349-355.e1, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989408

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate premium and out-of-pocket costs for child dental care services under various dental coverage options offered within the federally facilitated marketplace. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated premium and out-of-pocket costs for child dental care services for 12 patient profiles, which vary by dental care use and spending. We did this for 1039 medical plans that include child dental coverage, 2703 medical plans that do not include child dental coverage, and 583 stand-alone dental plans for the 2015 plan year. Our analysis is based on plan data from the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight and Data.HealthCare.Gov. RESULTS: On average, expected total financial outlays for child dental care services were lower when dental coverage was embedded within a medical plan compared with the alternative of a stand-alone dental plan. The difference, however, in average expected out-of-pocket spending varied significantly for our 12 patient profiles. Older children who are very high users of dental care, for example, have lower expected out-of-pocket costs under a stand-alone dental plan. For the vast majority of other age groups and dental care use profiles, the reverse holds. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that embedding dental coverage within medical plans, on average, results in lower total financial outlays for child beneficiaries. Although our results are specific to the federally facilitated marketplace, they hold lessons for both state-based marketplaces and the general private health insurance and dental benefits market, as well.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Seguro Odontológico/economía , Niño , Atención Odontológica Integral/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro Odontológico/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economía , Muestreo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA