RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of different substance combinations administered through mesotherapy in dogs with hip osteoarthritis. ANIMALS: 104 dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 4 groups (dogs treated with a combination of lidocaine, piroxicam, and thiocolchicoside [MG]; dogs treated with lidocaine, piroxicam, and Traumeel [TG]; dogs treated with lidocaine, piroxicam, and glucosamine [GG]; and dogs treated with the same combination as in MG combined with a photobiomodulation session [MPG]) were set. For all groups, the same treatment frequency was followed. Response to treatment was measured with the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (divided into pain interference score and pain severity score), Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD), and Canine Orthopedic Index (divided into function, gait, stiffness, and quality of life) before treatment and 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after treatment. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to investigate the influence of treatment, age, sex, body weight, breed, and Orthopedic Foundation for Animals score. RESULTS: Dogs had a mean age of 7.6 ± 3.1 years and body weight of 28.6 ± 5.5 kg. Hip osteoarthritis was classified as mild (4), moderate (70), or severe (30). Greater improvements were observed in MG and MPG. Kaplan-Meier estimators showed MG and MPG had longer periods with clinically significant results. Treatment was the covariable that contributed more frequently to the outcomes observed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The combination used in MG, particularly combined with photobiomodulation, produced longer-lasting clinically significant results.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros , Mesoterapia , Piroxicam , Animales , Perros , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Piroxicam/uso terapéutico , Piroxicam/administración & dosificación , Piroxicam/análogos & derivados , Mesoterapia/veterinaria , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada/veterinaria , Osteoartritis/veterinaria , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucosamina/uso terapéutico , Glucosamina/administración & dosificación , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/veterinaria , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/veterinariaRESUMEN
Background and Objective. 5-Fluorouracil is one of the most common chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of solid tumors. 5-Fluorouracil-associated cardiotoxicity is the second cause of cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapeutic drugs after anthracyclines. Colchicine is a strong anti-inflammatory drug used to prevent and treat acute gout and treat familial Mediterranean fever. And also, its protective effects on cardiovascular disease have been reported in various studies. The current study is aimed at appraising the effect of colchicine on 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Methods. Twenty male Wistar rats were divided into four groups as follows: control, 5-fluorouracil, colchicine (5 mg/kg), and 5-fluorouracil+5 mg/kg colchicine. Cardiotoxicity was induced with an intraperitoneal injection of a single dose of 5-fluorouracil (100 mg/kg). The control group received normal saline, and the treatment groups received colchicine with an intraperitoneal injection for 14 days. Findings. 5-Fluorouracil resulted in significant cardiotoxicity represented by an increase in cardiac enzymes, malondialdehyde levels, cyclooxygenase-2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression, cardiac enzymes, and histopathological degenerations. 5-Fluorouracil treatment also decreased body weight, total antioxidant capacity and catalase values, blood cells, and hemoglobin levels. In addition, 5-fluorouracil disrupted electrocardiographic parameters, including increased elevation in the ST segment and increased QRS duration. Treatment with colchicine reduced oxidative stress, cardiac enzymes, histopathological degenerations, and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cardiac tissue, improved electrocardiographic disorders, and enhanced the number of blood cells and total antioxidant capacity levels. Moreover, body weight loss was hampered after treatment with colchicine. Our results demonstrated that treatment with colchicine significantly improved cardiotoxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil in rats.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicum/química , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fitoquímicos/administración & dosificación , Fitoterapia/métodos , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cardiotoxicidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/enzimología , Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Miocardio/enzimología , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismoRESUMEN
Previous in vitro and in vivo experiments had demonstrated dose-dependent anti-cancer effects of clinical plasma colchicine concentrations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. This phase IIa trial was to evaluate the potential efficiency and safety of our novel colchicine dosage schedule for the palliative treatment of advanced HCC. The dosage schedule started from oral intake of 1 mg colchicine three times per day for 4 days and discontinuation in the following 3 days (one cycle). The treatment cycle was repeated and the dosage was adjusted ranging from 3 to 1.5 mg/day according to the condition of the participant. The control group was originated from chart review of 86 HCC patients treated by sorafenib for more than 2 months. Fifteen participants signed the inform consent. Two participants were excluded due to screening failure in one and less than four treatment cycles in another. For severe adverse events, the colchicine group demonstrated higher incidence of biliary tract obstruction (p = 0.0184) than the sorafenib group. Comparison grade 1 or 2 adverse events between two groups, the colchicine group had higher incidence of diarrhea (p = 0) and the sorafenib group had higher incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (p = 0.0045). There was no significant difference in mortality, median survival, and overall survival between two groups (all p > 0.2). In conclusion, our novel colchicine dosage schedule is clinically feasible and has the potential to be applied in the palliative treatment of advanced HCC especially based on the cost-effectiveness consideration.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Colestasis , Diarrea/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Colchicine is a well-known drug, which has been used for years to treat a wide range of rheumatic and inflammatory disorders. It helps break the cycle of inflammation through diverse mechanisms including reducing Intereukin-6, Interleukin-8, Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha besides controlling oxidative stress pathways which all are important and pathologic components in the clinical course and outcome of patients infected with COVID-19. This study aims to assess the anti-inflammatory effects of colchicine in non-severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio), double blind study with parallel group design. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients with positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 infection (RT -PCR) and lung Computed tomography scan involvement compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia. The patients are not severely hypoxic, do not need intubation or invasive oxygenation. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: known hypersensitivity to colchicine; known hepatic failure; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<30 ml/min/1.73m2 (by the CKD-EPI Creatinine Equation for Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) which estimates GFR based on serum creatinine. ; kidney transplant recipients, using Digoxin, QTc >450 msec. Participants will be recruited from inpatients at Labbafinejad Meidcal Center , Tehran, Iran. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Eligible enrolled patients will be randomized into two groups. Group A will receive the antiretroviral Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) while group B will receive Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) + Colchicine 1.5 mg loading then 0.5 mg twice daily orally. All patients in both groups will receive the same amounts of essential minerals, vitamins as antioxidants, and antibiotics. Patients of both groups will be treated under optimal treatment based on the CDC and WHO guidelines and national consensus proposed in Iran including the same dosages of Lopinavir/Ritonavir, antibiotics, trace elements and antioxidants while only in group-B patients Colchicine will be added on top of this protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary: Time for clinical improvement and lung CT score changes 14 days after treatment. Secondary: 14 days after treatment - C-Reactive Protein test x Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio , Interleukin-6, malondialdehyde (MDA) levels reduction - Percentage of patients who require supplemental Oxygen - Mean hospital stay length RANDOMISATION: Patients will be allocated to each group (ratio 1:1) by using an online randomization tool: http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/index.cfm BLINDING (MASKING): This will be a double-blind study in which participants and those assessing the final outcomes will be blinded to group assignment. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Regarding the pandemic crisis and our center capacity to hospitalize confirmed COVID-19 patients, a total of 80 patients was found to be logical to be randomized into two groups of 40- patients. TRIAL STATUS: Recruitment is ongoing. Recruitment began on 20/03/2020 and the date by which the recruitment is anticipated to be completed is 30/05/2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04360980, registered 24/04/2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Lopinavir/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ritonavir/administración & dosificación , COVID-19 , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a pandemic. Since then, thousands of people have suffered and died, making the need for a treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) more crucial than ever. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors carried out a search in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) for COVID-19 to provide information on the most promising treatments against SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Possible COVID-19 agents with promising efficacy and favorable safety profile were identified. The results support the combination of copper, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), colchicine and nitric oxide (NO) with candidate antiviral agents, remdesivir or EIDD-2801, as a treatment for patients positive for SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: The authors propose to study the effects of the combination of copper, NAC, colchicine, NO and currently used experimental antiviral agents, remdesivir or EIDD-2801, as a potential treatment scheme for SARS-COV-2.
Asunto(s)
Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Cobre/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribonucleósidos/uso terapéutico , Acetilcisteína/administración & dosificación , Acetilcisteína/farmacología , Adenosina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/farmacología , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Alanina/administración & dosificación , Alanina/farmacología , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/farmacología , Autofagia/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/fisiología , COVID-19 , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/farmacología , Cobre/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Citidina/análogos & derivados , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Hidroxilaminas , Inflamación , Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Óxido Nítrico/farmacología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Profármacos/administración & dosificación , Profármacos/uso terapéutico , Ribonucleósidos/administración & dosificación , Ribonucleósidos/farmacología , SARS-CoV-2 , Internalización del Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Replicación Viral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The relationship between gout medication use and cataract development is controversial. Moreover, limited clinical studies have evaluated this relationship. AIM: To assess the effects of colchicine, allopurinol and benzbromarone on the risk of cataract in patients with gout. DESIGN: Population-based nested case-control study. METHODS: We enrolled 7900 patients who had received a new diagnosis of cataract >3 years after gout diagnosis into the study group and 33 475 patients who did not receive a diagnosis of cataract into the control group by matching for age, sex and the year of gout diagnosis at a ratio of 1:1. We used World Health Organization's defined daily dose (DDD) as a measure to assess the dosage of colchicine, allopurinol and benzbromarone exposure. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of cataract. RESULTS: The risk of cataract significantly increased in patients who received colchicine at a cumulative DDD of ≥66.5 (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01-1.36, P = 0.041). In the age-stratified analysis, patients with gout aged >60 years had a higher risk of cataract (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.06-1.53, P = 0.011) than did patients aged <60 years. Allopurinol and benzbromarone had no association with cataract. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based nested case-control study, we observed that colchicine use increased the risk of cataract in patients with gout, especially in those aged >60 years who received colchicine at a cumulative DDD of >66.5.
Asunto(s)
Catarata/inducido químicamente , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Supresores de la Gota/efectos adversos , Gota/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alopurinol/uso terapéutico , Benzbromarona/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catarata/epidemiología , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gota/complicaciones , Supresores de la Gota/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever, a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine as a potential drug for preventing attacks of familial Mediterranean fever. For those people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as rilonacept, anakinra, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide and interferon-alpha might be beneficial. This is an updated version of the review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with familial Mediterranean fever. SEARCH METHODS: We used detailed search strategies to search the following databases: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM); China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI); Wan Fang; and VIP. In addition, we also searched the clinical trials registries including ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, as well as references listed in relevant reports.Date of last search: 21 August 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of people diagnosed with familial Mediterranean fever, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide, interferon-alpha, ImmunoGuard™ (a herbal dietary supplement) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data to present the risk ratio or mean difference with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed overall evidence quality according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with a total of 249 participants (aged three to 53 years); five were of cross-over and four of parallel design. Six studies used oral colchicine, one used oral ImmunoGuard™ and the remaining two used rilonacept or anakinra as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to eight months.The three studies of ImmunoGuard™, rilonacept and anakinra were generally well-designed, except for an unclear risk of detection bias in one of these. However, some inadequacy existed in the four older studies on colchicine, which had an unclear risk of selection bias, detection bias and reporting bias, and also a high risk of attrition bias and other potential bias. Neither of the two studies comparing a single to a divided dose of colchicine were adequately blinded, furthermore one study had an unclear risk of selection bias and reporting bias, a high risk of attrition bias and other potential bias.We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis, any adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack, but data were not available for all outcomes across all comparisons.One study (15 participants) reported a significant reduction in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months with 0.6 mg colchicine three times daily (14% versus 100%), risk ratio 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.95) (low-quality evidence). A further study (22 participants) of 0.5 mg colchicine twice daily showed no significant reduction in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months (low-quality evidence). A study of rilonacept in individuals who were colchicine-resistant or intolerant (14 participants) also showed no reduction at three months (moderate-quality evidence). Likewise, a study of anakinra given to colchicine-resistant people (25 participants) showed no reduction in the number of participants experiencing an attack at four months (moderate-quality evidence).Three studies reported no significant differences in duration of attacks: one comparing colchicine to placebo (15 participants) (very low-quality evidence); one comparing single-dose colchicine to divided-dose colchicine (90 participants) (moderate-quality evidence); and one comparing rilonacept to placebo (14 participants) (low-quality evidence). Three studies reported no significant differences in the number of days between attacks: two comparing colchicine to placebo (24 participants in total) (very low-quality evidence); and one comparing rilonacept to placebo (14 participants) (low-quality evidence).No study reported on the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis.One study of colchicine reported loose stools and frequent bowel movements (very low-quality evidence) and a second reported diarrhoea (very low-quality evidence). The rilonacept study reported no significant differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertension, headache, respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions and herpes, compared to placebo (low-quality evidence). The ImmunoGuard study observed no side effects (moderate-quality evidence). The anakinra study reported no significant differences between intervention and placebo, including injection site reaction, headache, presyncope, dyspnea and itching (moderate-quality evidence). When comparing single and divided doses of colchicine, one study reported no difference in adverse events (including anorexia, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, vomiting and elevated liver enzymes) between groups (moderate-quality evidence) and the second study reported no adverse effects were detected.The rilonacept study reported no significant reduction in acute phase response indicators after three months (low-quality evidence). In the ImmunoGuard™ study, these indicators were not reduced after one month of treatment (moderate-quality evidence). The anakinra study, reported that C-reactive protein was significantly reduced after four months (moderate-quality evidence). One of the single dose versus divided dose colchicine studies reported no significant reduction in acute phase response indicators after eight months (low-quality evidence), while the second study reported no significant reduction in serum amyloid A concentration after six months (moderate-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited RCTs assessing interventions for people with familial Mediterranean fever. Based on the evidence, three times daily colchicine appears to reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, colchicine single dose and divided dose might not be different for children with familial Mediterranean fever and anakinra might reduce C-reactive protein in colchicine-resistant participants; however, only a few RCTs contributed data for analysis. Further RCTs examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever can be drawn.
Asunto(s)
Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Fiebre Mediterránea Familiar/tratamiento farmacológico , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/administración & dosificación , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of mesotherapy in dogs compared with a positive control group. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental, randomized, blinded study. ANIMALS: Fifteen working police dogs with chronic back pain. METHODS: Animals were divided randomly into control (CG; n = 5) and treatment groups (TG; n = 10). A combination of 140 mg lidocaine, 15 mg dexamethasone and 20 mg thiocolchicoside was administered to group TG along with a 70-day course of a placebo, administered as if it was carprofen. Carprofen was administered to Group CG for 70 days, at a dose adjusted to their weight. On day 0, an intradermal injection of Ringer's lactate was also administered. Both groups were rested for 3 days and resumed normal activity over a 5-day period. Response to treatment, measured by the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) and the Hudson Visual Analogue Scale (HVAS), was evaluated before treatment (T0), after 15 days (T1) and 1 (T2), 2 (T3), 3 (T4), 4 (T5) and 5 (T6) months. Results were compared using a Mann-Whitney test or a paired samples t test. RESULTS: When comparing CBPI results, no differences were found between groups TG and CG at T0 through T3 and in T6 and T7. Differences were observed in CBPI sections after the discontinuation of carprofen: at T4 [p = 0.02 for Pain Interference Score (PIS) and p = 0.03 for Pain Severity Score (PSS)] and T5 (p = 0.16 for PIS and p = 0.03 for PSS), with group TG having overall better results. Individual treatment results were considered successful in one dog of group CG (20%), whereas in group TG, success was higher (ranging from 78% at T1 to 22% at T7). No significant differences were registered with the HVAS. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Mesotherapy may be a promising treatment option for canine musculoskeletal-related pain. Further studies are required.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/terapia , Mesoterapia/veterinaria , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Carbazoles/administración & dosificación , Carbazoles/uso terapéutico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Perros , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Mesoterapia/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/veterinaria , PoliciaRESUMEN
Colchicine overdose is uncommon but potentially life threatening. Due to its serious adverse systemic effects, overdose must be recognized and treated. We report a case of an 18-year-old female who ingested 18 mg (~0.4 mg/kg) of colchicine in a suicide attempt. The patient's clinical manifestations included abdominal cramps, vomiting, pancytopenia, hypocholesterolemia, and rhabdomyolysis. Two unique manifestations of toxicity in this patient were profound and persistent, severe hypertriglyceridemia and electrolyte imbalance, mainly hypophosphatemia, with no other evident cause except the colchicine intoxication. Following intensive supportive treatment, including ventilator support, N-acetylcysteine, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, electrolyte repletion, and zinc supplementation, the patient made a complete recovery. Colchicine intoxication is a severe, life-threatening situation that should be followed closely in intensive care units. Severe changes in body functions can rapidly develop, as previously described in the literature. To our knowledge, this extremely elevated triglyceride level has never been reported without the administration of propofol, and requires further evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Colchicina/envenenamiento , Hipertrigliceridemia/inducido químicamente , Intento de Suicidio , Adolescente , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
In professional road cyclists, the majority of overuse injuries affect the lower limbs and are mostly represented by contractures or muscle shortening, characterized by an increase of tone and stiffness and a variation of elasticity. Treatment and prevention of these specific conditions may include physical, supplementary, and pharmacologic support. The aim of this real-life study was to determine: first, the alterations of tone, stiffness, elasticity, and soreness of rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) in top class cyclists engaged in 3 multistage races, and second, whether any variable in the management of the athletes may affect the prevention and/or reduction of such alterations.Twenty-three professional cyclists competing in 3 international, cycling stage races were assessed. Athletes could receive, upon the approval of the medical staff, physical, dietary, and/or pharmacological management which could include treatments with topical over-the-counter myorelaxants to prevent and/or reduce muscle contractures. MyotonPro was used to daily measure tone, stiffness, and elasticity in RF and BF in relaxed and contracted state after every stage. In parallel, BF and RF soreness was also assessed with a Likert scale.All athletes received the same general massage management; none of them received dietary supplements; some of the athletes were treated with a topical myorelaxant thiocolchicoside (TCC 0.25%) foam 3 times daily. TCC was identified as the only variable able to affect these muscle parameters in the cyclists. Tone, stiffness (regardless of the state), and soreness significantly increased over time either in BF or RF in all athletes. In the group of athletes that used TCC (nâ=â11; TCC+) the increase in tone, stiffness, and soreness was significantly lower than in the group not receiving TCC (nâ=â12; No-TCC). Elasticity varied coherently with tone and stiffness.A very intense and protracted sport activity increases muscular tone, stiffness, and soreness over time. Topical TCC foam significantly attenuates these alterations and might represent an efficient strategy both to prevent and manage contractures and their consequences in professional cyclists as well in athletes from other disciplines involving similar workloads.
Asunto(s)
Ciclismo/lesiones , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/prevención & control , Músculos Isquiosurales/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Músculo Cuádriceps/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Atletas , Ciclismo/fisiología , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/fisiopatología , Elasticidad , Músculos Isquiosurales/lesiones , Músculos Isquiosurales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masaje , Tono Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Mialgia/etiología , Mialgia/fisiopatología , Mialgia/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Músculo Cuádriceps/lesiones , Músculo Cuádriceps/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The traditional gout medication colchicine has been reported to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery in a few clinical trials. Severe adverse events have not yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess possible direct electrophysiological effects in an experimental whole-heart model. Ten rabbit hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Thereafter, colchicine was administered in two concentrations (1 and 3 µM). Eight endo- and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a 12-lead ECG showed a stable QT interval and action potential duration during colchicine infusion. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in dispersion of repolarization. However, colchicine induced a dose-dependent significant decrease of effective refractory period (ERP; 1 µM: -19 ms, 3 µM: -22 ms; p < 0.05). In the present study, acute infusion of colchicine in isolated rabbit hearts resulted in a reduction of ERP in the presence of a stable myocardial repolarization. This led to a significantly elevated inducibility of ventricular fibrillation. In 4 of 10 hearts, incessant ventricular fibrillation occurred. These results suggest a pro-arrhythmic or toxic effect of colchicine and underline that further clinical studies on potential adverse effects should be conducted before the drug can be recommended for routine use after atrial fibrillation ablation.
Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción/efectos de los fármacos , Colchicina/toxicidad , Supresores de la Gota/toxicidad , Fibrilación Ventricular/inducido químicamente , Animales , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/farmacología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Electrocardiografía , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Supresores de la Gota/administración & dosificación , Supresores de la Gota/farmacología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , ConejosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD), a common neurodegenerative disorder, recognized to be a major cause of dementia. The aim of the present study was to investigate the neuroprotective mechanisms of clove oil in intracerebroventricular (icv)-colchicine induced cognitive dysfunction in rats. METHODS: Single bilateral icv-colchicine (15µg/5µl) was administered, followed by drug treatment with clove oil (0.05ml/kg and 0.1ml/kg, ip), minocycline (25 and 50mg/kg, ip) and their combinations for a period of 21 days. Various neurobehavioral parameters followed by biochemical, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) level and mitochondrial respiratory enzyme complexes (I-IV) were assessed. RESULTS: Colchicine icv administration significantly impaired cognitive performance in Morris water maze (MWM) causes oxidative stress, raised AChE level, caused neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction as compared to sham treatment. Treatment with clove oil (0.05ml/kg and 0.1ml/kg) and minocycline (25 and 50mg/kg) alone significantly improved cognitive performance as evidenced by reduced transfer latency and increased time spent in target quadrant (TSTQ) in MWM task, reduced AChE activity, oxidative damage (reduced lipid peroxidation levels, nitrite level and restored glutathione levels) and restored mitochondrial respiratory enzyme complex (I-IV) activities as compared to icv-colchicine treatment. Further, combinations of clove oil (0.1ml/kg) with minocycline (50mg/kg) significantly modulate the neuroprotective effect of clove oil as compared to their effect alone. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights that the major neuroprotective effect of clove oil due to its mitochondrial restoring and anti-oxidant properties along with a microglial inhibitory mechanism.
Asunto(s)
Aceite de Clavo/farmacología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/prevención & control , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Acetilcolinesterasa/metabolismo , Animales , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Complejo IV de Transporte de Electrones/metabolismo , Infusiones Intraventriculares , Masculino , Minociclina/farmacología , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/enzimología , NADH Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Ratas , Succinato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Sales de Tetrazolio/metabolismo , Tiazoles/metabolismoRESUMEN
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Dicliptera chinensis is a traditional herbal medicine used anciently in China for hepatopathy treatment, especially in south areas. Our several studies have demonstrated that dicliptera chinensis polysaccharides (DCP), which has a markedly protective effects on chemistry-induced models of acute liver injury in rats. In this study, we further investigated the potentially hepatoprotective effect of dicliptera chinensis polysaccharides (DCP) on hepatic fibrosis (HF) rats induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The 96 rats were randomly divided into six groups (n=16, per group), the normal control group intragastrically administrated normal saline, model control group intraperitoneally injected with 0.5% DMN solution at 1.6mL per kg (three times a week); colchicine intragastrically administrated group (0.2mgkg(-)(1)d(-1))+DMN-treated rats; DCP intragastrically administrated groups (100mgkg(-)(1)d(-)(1), 200mgkg(-1)d(-1), 300mgkg(-1)d(-1))+DMN-treated rats. At the end of 8 weeks, all rats were sacrificed. RESULTS: Pathological examination showed that high and medium doses of DCP presented remarkable effect in ameliorating hepatic fibrosis, alleviate the inflammation, necrosis and reduced collagen deposits. DCP effectively improved the liver function, as revealed in being lowered sero-enzyme levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) while increased albumin (ALB), and being reduced sero-concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the HF rats. Additionally, the contents of hyaluronic acid (HA), collagen type â £ (â £-C), type III precollagen (PCIII) and laminin (LN) in the hepatic tissue of HF rats were markedly decreased, whereas the expressions of transforming growth factor-ß l (TGF-ß l), collagen type I (Col- I), metal protease-1 (TIMP-1), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) expression in the hepatic tissue were notably down-regulated. CONCLUSION: DCP exerts effectively antagonistic activity on DMN-caused hepatotoxicity in HF rats, which the anti-fibrotic mechanisms are associated with regulating functionally serous enzymes, improving metabolic function and inhibiting inflammatory reaction in liver tissue.
Asunto(s)
Acanthaceae/química , Dimetilnitrosamina/toxicidad , Cirrosis Hepática/inducido químicamente , Cirrosis Hepática/prevención & control , Polisacáridos/uso terapéutico , Sustancias Protectoras/farmacología , Animales , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/patología , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Colágeno/metabolismo , Citocinas/metabolismo , Hígado/enzimología , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Necrosis , Polisacáridos/química , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-DawleyRESUMEN
Thiocolchicoside (TCC) is an effective therapeutic agent against the orthopaedic, traumatic and rheumatologic disorders but it suffer from the drawback of poor bioavailability due to extensive first pass metabolism and low permeability via the oral route. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of nanoemulsion (NE) for bioavailability enhancement of TCC through the transdermal route. The NEs were developed using Linseed: sefsol in 1:1 ratio as the oil phase, span 80, Transcutol P and distilled water as surfactant, co-surfactant and aqueous phase. Furthermore, selected formulations were subjected to physical stability and consequently evaluated for in vitro permeation using porcine skin. The optimized formulation had small average globule diameter of 117 nm with polydispersity index of 0.285. The globules were spherical in shape as observed by transmission electron microscopy. The in vitro skin permeation profile of optimized NE was compared with aqueous solution of TCC. Significant increase in permeability parameters were observed in NEs formulation (p < 0.05) as compared to aqueous solution of TCC. The steady-state flux (Jss) and permeability coefficient (Kp) for optimized NE formulation (C1) were found to be 30.63 ± 4.18 µg/cm(2)/h and 15.21 × 10(-3) ± 2.81cm(2)/h, respectively. The results of enhanced permeation through transdermal route suggest that water-in-oil NEs which are compatible with the lipophilic sebum environment of the hair follicle facilitate the transport of TCC, and such transport might be predominantly transfollicular in nature. Overall, these results suggested that water-in-oil NEs are good carriers for transdermal delivery of TCC.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Portadores de Fármacos , Aceite de Linaza/química , Nanopartículas , Polímeros/química , Glicoles de Propileno/química , Absorción Cutánea , Piel/metabolismo , Administración Cutánea , Animales , Antiinflamatorios/química , Antiinflamatorios/metabolismo , Rastreo Diferencial de Calorimetría , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/química , Colchicina/metabolismo , Composición de Medicamentos , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Emulsiones , Glicoles de Etileno/química , Hexosas/química , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Técnicas In Vitro , Cinética , Microscopía Confocal , Microscopía Electrónica de Transmisión , Nanotecnología , Permeabilidad , Solubilidad , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier , Propiedades de Superficie , Tensoactivos/química , Porcinos , Tecnología Farmacéutica/métodos , Viscosidad , Agua/químicaRESUMEN
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication of cardiac surgery that occurs in up to 60% of patients. POAF is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke and other arrhythmias that can impact on early and long term clinical outcomes and health economics. Many factors such as disease-induced cardiac remodelling, operative trauma, changes in atrial pressure and chemical stimulation and reflex sympathetic/parasympathetic activation have been implicated in the development of POAF. There is mounting evidence to support a major role for inflammation and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of POAF. Both are consequences of using cardiopulmonary bypass and reperfusion following ischaemic cardioplegic arrest. Subsequently, several anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs have been tested in an attempt to reduce the incidence of POAF. However, prevention remains suboptimal and thus far none of the tested drugs has provided sufficient efficacy to be widely introduced in clinical practice. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the onset and persistence of POAF is needed to develop more effective prediction and interventions.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Inflamación/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Ácido Ascórbico/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/fisiopatología , Vitamina E/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Resveratrol has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, while sodium alginate is a common pharmaceutic adjuvant with antioxidative and immunomodulatory properties. We performed an animal study to investigate the effect of sodium alginate addition to resveratrol on acute gouty arthritis. METHODS: Twenty-four SPF Wistar mice were randomized to four groups receiving the combination of sodium alginate and resveratrol, resveratrol alone, colchicine, and placebo, respectively. Acute gouty arthritis was induced by injection of 0.05 ml monosodium urate (MSU) solution (25g/mL) into ankle joint cavity. IL-1ß, CCR5, and CXCL10 levels in both serum and synovial fluid were measured using ELISA. NLRP3 expression in the synovial tissues was measured using western plot. RESULTS: The combination of sodium alginate and resveratrol significantly reduced synovial levels of IL-1ß, CCR5, and CXCL10 when compared with colchicines, and all P values were less than 0.0001. The combination of sodium alginate and resveratrol was also superior to resveratrol in terms of both serum levels and synovial levels of IL-1ß, CCR5, and CXCL10. In addition, resveratrol, with or without sodium alginate, could reduce NLRP3 expression obviously in the synovial tissues. CONCLUSION: The combination of sodium alginate and resveratrol has better effect over colchicines in treating MSU-induced acute gouty arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Alginatos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Artritis Gotosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Estilbenos/administración & dosificación , Alginatos/farmacología , Animales , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Artritis Gotosa/sangre , Artritis Gotosa/etiología , Quimiocina CXCL10/metabolismo , Colchicina/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ácido Glucurónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Glucurónico/farmacología , Ácidos Hexurónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Hexurónicos/farmacología , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Ratones , Receptores CCR5/metabolismo , Resveratrol , Estilbenos/farmacología , Ácido ÚricoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever, a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine as a potential drug for preventing attacks of familial Mediterranean fever. For those people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as rilonacept, anakinra, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide and interferon-alpha might be beneficial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with familial Mediterranean fever. SEARCH METHODS: We used detailed search strategies to search the following databases: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI); Wan Fang; and VIP. In addition, we also searched the clinical trials registries including ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, as well as references listed in relevant reports.Date of last search: 21 May 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled studies of people with diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide, interferon-alpha, ImmunoGuard™ (a herbal dietary supplement) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data to present the risk ratio or mean difference with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed overall evidence quality according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included four randomized placebo-controlled studies with a total of 75 participants (aged three to 53 years); three were of cross-over and one of parallel design. Two studies used the active intervention of oral colchicine (0.6 mg three times daily or 0.5 mg twice daily), one study used oral ImmunoGuard™ and the fourth used rilonacept as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to three months.The two most recent studies were generally well-designed, except for an unclear risk of detection bias in one of these. However, some inadequacy existed in the other two older studies, where each had an unclear risk of selection bias, a high risk of attrition bias, an unclear risk of reporting bias and a high risk of other potential bias (baseline characteristics such as mutation status and disease severity were not described); one of these studies additionally had an unclear risk of detection bias.We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, any adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack, but data were not available for all outcomes across all comparisons.Based on one study (15 participants), there was a significant reduction in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months when colchicine was administered at a dose of 0.6 mg three times daily (14% versus 100%), risk ratio 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.95); however, the GRADE evidence quality was low. Based on two further studies, there was no significant reduction in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months when colchicine was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg twice daily (22 participants) in people with familial Mediterranean fever, or at three months when rilonacept was used in individuals who were colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant (14 participants). In the ImmunoGuard™ study (24 participants) acute phase response indicators (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein) were not reduced after one month treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited randomized controlled studies assessing interventions for people with familial Mediterranean fever. Based on the evidence, colchicine appears to reduce the number of people experiencing attacks; however, only a few low-quality randomized controlled studies contributed data for analysis. Further randomized controlled studies examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever can be drawn.
Asunto(s)
Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Fiebre Mediterránea Familiar/tratamiento farmacológico , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to compare the efficacy of ozone therapy and drug treatment in patients with painful temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder (TMD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients with TMD were enrolled; 33 were treated with bio-oxidative therapy and 30 with a ketoprofen tablet thiocolchicoside capsule 2 × 1 for 7 days. Maximum voluntary interincisal mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters using a scale and recorded during the pre- and posttreatment periods. The patients evaluated their subjective pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the independent t test. RESULTS: The mean MMO of the group that received ozone therapy during the pretreatment period was 46.51 ± 8.2 mm, and it immediately increased to 48.78 ± 7.5 mm after 1 week of ozone therapy, which was statistically significant (p = 0.04). For those who received medication, the mean MMO during the pretreatment period was 46.30 mm, and at the end of 1 week it was 46.9 mm. In the ozone group, 29% of patients showed a gradual decrease in their VAS pain scores compared to pretreatment values (6.3 ± 2.1 to 3.0 ± 2.2). In the medication group, 24% of patients showed a significant decrease in VAS pain scores during the follow-up period (6.9 ± 1.4 to 5.0 ± 1.5). CONCLUSION: This study showed that bio-oxidative therapy was a more effective treatment than medication therapy for relieving TMJ pain.
Asunto(s)
Ozono/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/terapia , Adulto , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Cetoprofeno/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Chuanhu anti-gout mixture has been used for many years in the treatment of gout in Chinese Traditional Medicine, and current methods for treatments for acute gouty arthritis have been either less effective or have had serious side effects. METHODS: In this 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority study, outpatient individuals with newly diagnosed acute gouty arthritis were randomly assigned to receive Chuanhu anti-gout mixture or colchicine. Both the study investigators and the participants were masked to the treatment assignments. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of acute gouty arthritis, and the secondary outcomes were changes in white blood cells (WHC) and C-reactive protein (CRP). This trial is registered at ISRCTN.org as trial ISRCTN65219941. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were randomly assigned to receive either the Chuanhu anti-gout mixture or Colchicine. The overall recurrence rates in the Chuanhu anti-gout mixture group (CH group) and the Colchicine group (Col group) were 12.50% vs 14.77% (difference -2.22%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -10.78%~6.23%), meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion of 15%, as did the data for WHC and CRP. The incidence of adverse events (mainly diarrhea) was less in the Col group than in the CH group (2.27% vs 28.41%, 95% CI 0.01~0.26). In addition, changes in blood uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and creatinine in the CH group were significantly larger compared to those in the Col group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Chuanhu anti-gout mixture was non-inferior to colchicine for the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. The study suggested that the Chuanhu anti-gout mixture can be considered an alternative choice for the treatment of acute gouty arthritis because of its lower incidence of adverse events and its protection of kidney and renal function.