Rehabilitation for unilateral deafness - Narrative review comparing a novel bone conduction solution with existing options.

Patients with single sided deafness (SSD) struggle with sound localization and speech in noise. Existing treatment options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), passive transcutaneous BCHDs, active BCHDs, and cochlear implants. Implanted devices provide benefits in speech in noise compared to CROS devices. Percutaneous BCHDs transmit sound efficiently but have aesthetic drawbacks and skin complications. Scalp attenuation impacts passive transcutaneous BCHD performance. Active BCHDs overcome these issues and provide benefits for speech in noise. Cochlear implantation is the only existing option that restores binaural input but introduces electrical rather than acoustic stimuli to the deaf ear. Active BCHDs have been designed to maintain efficient sound transmission and avoid chronic skin irritation and cosmetic concerns that may occur with percutaneous BCHDs. Cochlear implantation may be a superior option for recently deafened SSD patients, though this requires further study. The duration of deafness, patient age and comorbidities, and a shared decision-making model among patients, surgeons, and audiologists should be considered in device selection. The aim of this manuscript is to review available devices, discuss surgical considerations for implantable devices, review available published results for speech in noise and sound quality with each device, and provide an overview to guide shared decision making for patients and providers. This review consolidates available literature and reviews experience with a newer active transcutaneous active BCHD available for use in the SSD population.

Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.

This study aimed to characterize binaural hearing abilities with bone conduction stimulation in simulated conductive hearing loss. Bone conduction hearing devices (BCDs) are a common method of rehabilitating conductive hearing loss. However, little is known about the access these devices provide to binaural cues. To study the ability of BCDs to restore access to binaural cues in conductive loss, normal hearing listeners were plugged unilaterally and bilaterally and localization ability was assessed using a non-surgical BCD attached to the mastoid/s via an adhesive (MED-EL, Corp). The results demonstrate that 1) application of the BCD in simulated unilateral conductive hearing loss does not restore access to binaural cues, evidenced by poor localization abilities. 2) bilateral application of BCDs in simulated bilateral conductive hearing loss provides access to binaural cues, 2) unilateral application of BCDs in simulated bilateral conductive hearing loss disrupts these cues and impairs localization performance, The transcutaneous stimulation of the adhesive BCD resulted in decreased access to sound compared to the normal open ear, resulting in asymmetries in aided versus non-aided hearing thresholds. Symmetrical hearing results in improved localization abilities, while asymmetric hearing disrupts sound localization abilities.

Electrode impedance changes over time in MED El cochlear implant children recipients: Relation to stimulation levels and behavioral measures.

Objective: Electrode impedance measures resistance encountered by electric current passing through wires, electrodes and biological tissue. This study was designed mainly to evaluate changes in electrode impedance values and psycho-electric parameters changes (i.e. threshold levels, comfortable levels, and dynamic range) in cochlear implant patients over time. Methods: It was a prospective study encompassing 20 patients implanted by MED-EL device programd using behavioral programs. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values were examined at 0, 1, 3 and 6 months after the first fitting session. Results: Electrode impedance values were reduced from the time of activation to the 6 months visit. Most comfortable levels increased and dynamic range widened until the 6 months visit. There was an inverse correlation between impedance values and most comfortable level as well as dynamic range, over time. Conclusion: Frequent monitoring of electrode impedance (for device and electrodes problems) and electric stimulation levels (for better performance, mapping and habituation) during the first 6 months of implant use is recommended.

Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.

Cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing combine acoustic and electric hearing in one ear, this is called electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). In EAS users, masking can be shown for electric probes in the presence of acoustic maskers and vice versa. Masking effects in acoustic hearing are generally attributed to nonlinearities of the basilar membrane and hair cell adaptation effects. However, similar masking patterns are observed more centrally in electric hearing. Consequently, there is no consensus so far on the level of interaction between the two modalities. Animal studies have shown that electric-acoustic interaction effects can result in reduced physiological responses in the cochlear nerve and the inferior colliculus. In CI users with residual hearing, it has recently become feasible to record intracochlear potentials with a high spatial resolution via the implanted electrode array. An investigation of the electrophysiological effects during combined electric-acoustic stimulation in humans might be used to assess peripheral mechanisms of masking. Seventeen MED-EL Flex electrode users with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in both a behavioral and a physiological electric-acoustic masking experiment. Psychoacoustic methods were used to measure the changes in behavioral thresholds due to the presence of a masker of the opposing modality. Subjects were stimulated electrically with unmodulated pulse trains using a research interface and acoustically with pure tones delivered via headphones. Auditory response telemetry was used to obtain objective electrophysiological changes of electrically evoked compound action potential and electrocochleography for electric, acoustic and combined electric-acoustic presentation in the same subjects. Behavioral thresholds of probe tones, either electric or acoustic, were significantly elevated in the presence of acoustic or electric maskers, respectively. 15 subjects showed significant electric threshold elevation with acoustic masking that did not depend on the electric-acoustic frequency difference (EAFD), a measure for the proximity of stimulation sites in the cochlea. Electric masking showed significant threshold elevation in eleven subjects, which depended significantly on EAFD. In the electrophysiological masking experiment, reduced responses to electric and acoustic stimulation with additional stimulation of the opposing modality were observed. Results showed a similar asymmetry as the psychoacoustic masking experiment. Response reduction was smaller than threshold elevation, especially for electric masking. Some subjects showed reduced responses to acoustic stimulation with electric masking, especially for small EAFD. The reduction of electrically evoked responses was significant in some subjects. No correlation was observed between psychoacoustic and electrophysiological masking results. From present study, it can be concluded that both electric and acoustic stimulation mask each other when presented simultaneously. Electrophysiological measurements indicate that masking effects are already to some extent present in the periphery.

Long-term subjective loneliness in adults after hearing loss treatment.

Objective: While hearing loss is associated with loneliness, the long term impact of hearing loss interventions remains unknown. We investigated levels of loneliness in adults at baseline, 6-months, 1-year and 5-years after receiving a hearing aid (HA) or cochlear implant (CI). Design: In this 5-year follow-up to the Studying Multiple Outcomes after Aural Rehabilitative Treatment study, participants completed the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale at baseline, 6-months, 1-year, and 5-year time points. Generalized estimating equations modeled the population average UCLA score over time. Study Sample: Analytic cohort of 115 participants (74% of original 156) 50 years or older who received a HA or CI at baseline and completed at least one follow up visit. Results: Loneliness scores were not different at 5 years versus baseline for HA users. CI users showed significantly reduced loneliness at 6-months and 1-year from baseline and with no significant difference at 5 years. Conclusion: Over 5 years, we observed no increase in loneliness from baseline in a cohort of adults receiving HAs and CIs. Short-term reduction in loneliness in CI users was demonstrated. Future randomized trials are needed to definitively assess the impact of treated versus untreated hearing loss on loneliness.

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.

Recent technological advances have led to a rapid increase in alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids. The aim was to systematically review the existing evidence to assess the effectiveness of alternative listening devices in adults with mild and moderate hearing loss. A systematic search strategy of the scientific literature was employed, reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Eleven studies met eligibility for inclusion: two studies evaluated personal sound amplification products, and nine studies assessed remote microphone systems (frequency modulation, Bluetooth, wireless). The evidence in this review suggests that alternative listening devices improve behavioural measures of speech intelligibility relative to unaided and/or aided conditions. Evidence for whether alternative listening devices improve self-reported outcomes is inconsistent. The evidence was judged to be of poor to good quality and subject to bias due to limitations in study design. Our overall recommendation is that high-quality evidence (i.e. randomised controlled trials) is required to demonstrate the effectiveness of alternative listening devices. Such evidence is not currently available and is necessary to guide healthcare commissioners and policymakers when considering new service delivery models for adults with hearing loss. Review registration: Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), CRD42015029582.

Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.

Aversiveness of loud sounds is a frequent complaint by hearing aid users, especially when fitted bilaterally. This study investigates whether loudness summation can be held responsible for this finding. Two aspects of loudness summation should be taken into account: spectral loudness summation for broadband signals and binaural loudness summation for signals that are presented binaurally. In this study, the effect of different symmetrical hearing losses was studied. Measurements were obtained with the widely used technique of Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling. For large bandwidths, spectral loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners was found to be greater than that for normal-hearing listeners, both for monaurally and binaurally presented signals. For binaural loudness summation, the effect of hearing loss was not significant. In all cases, individual differences were substantial.

The use of self-report measures to examine changes in perception in response to fittings using different signal processing parameters.

Clinicians have long used self-report methods to assess hearing aid benefit. However, there are fewer data as to whether self-report instruments can be used to compare differences between signal processing settings. This study examined how self-perceived performance varied as a function of modifications in signal processing using two self-report measures. Data were collected as part of a double-blind randomised crossover clinical trial. Participants were fit with two fittings: mild processing (slow time constants, disabled frequency lowering) and strong processing (fast time constants, frequency lowering enabled). The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing (SSQ) questionnaire and the Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) questionnaire were collected at multiple time points. Older adults with sensorineural hearing loss who had not used hearing aids within the previous year participated (49 older adults were consented; 40 were included in the final data analyses). Findings show that listeners report a difference in perceived performance when hearing aid features are modified. Both self-report measures were able to capture this change in perceived performance. Self-report measures provide a tool for capturing changes in perceived performance when hearing aid processing features are modified and may enhance provision of an evidence-based hearing aid fitting.

Evaluation of a multi-channel algorithm for reducing transient sounds.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate and select appropriate parameters for a multi-channel transient reduction (MCTR) algorithm for detecting and attenuating transient sounds in speech. DESIGN: In each trial, the same sentence was played twice. A transient sound was presented in both sentences, but its level varied across the two depending on whether or not it had been processed by the MCTR and on the "strength" of the processing. The participant indicated their preference for which one was better and by how much in terms of the balance between the annoyance produced by the transient and the audibility of the transient (they were told that the transient should still be audible). STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty English-speaking participants were tested, 10 with normal hearing and 10 with mild-to-moderate hearing-impairment. Frequency-dependent linear amplification was provided for the latter. RESULTS: The results for both participant groups indicated that sounds processed using the MCTR were preferred over the unprocessed sounds. For the hearing-impaired participants, the medium and strong settings of the MCTR were preferred over the weak setting. CONCLUSIONS: The medium and strong settings of the MCTR reduced the annoyance produced by the transients while maintaining their audibility.

Development of a multimedia educational programme for first-time hearing aid users: a participatory design.

OBJECTIVE: To develop content for a series of interactive video tutorials (or reusable learning objects, RLOs) for first-time adult hearing aid users, to enhance knowledge of hearing aids and communication. DESIGN: RLO content was based on an electronically-delivered Delphi review, workshops, and iterative peer-review and feedback using a mixed-methods participatory approach. STUDY SAMPLE: An expert panel of 33 hearing healthcare professionals, and workshops involving 32 hearing aid users and 11 audiologists. This ensured that social, emotional and practical experiences of the end-user alongside clinical validity were captured. RESULTS: Content for evidence-based, self-contained RLOs based on pedagogical principles was developed for delivery via DVD for television, PC or internet. Content was developed based on Delphi review statements about essential information that reached consensus (≥90%), visual representations of relevant concepts relating to hearing aids and communication, and iterative peer-review and feedback of content. CONCLUSIONS: This participatory approach recognises and involves key stakeholders in the design process to create content for a user-friendly multimedia educational intervention, to supplement the clinical management of first-time hearing aid users. We propose participatory methodologies are used in the development of content for e-learning interventions in hearing-related research and clinical practice.

Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.

Recent studies have shown that activating the noise reduction scheme in hearing aids results in a smaller peak pupil dilation (PPD), indicating reduced listening effort, at 50% and 95% correct sentence recognition with a 4-talker masker. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the noise reduction scheme (on or off) on PPD and sentence recognition across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) from +16 dB to -12 dB and two masker types (4-talker and stationary noise). Relatively low PPDs were observed at very low (-12 dB) and very high (+16 dB to +8 dB) SNRs presumably due to 'giving up' and 'easy listening', respectively. The maximum PPD was observed with SNRs at approximately 50% correct sentence recognition. Sentence recognition with both masker types was significantly improved by the noise reduction scheme, which corresponds to the shift in performance from SNR function at approximately 5 dB toward a lower SNR. This intelligibility effect was accompanied by a corresponding effect on the PPD, shifting the peak by approximately 4 dB toward a lower SNR. In addition, with the 4-talker masker, when the noise reduction scheme was active, the PPD was smaller overall than that when the scheme was inactive. We conclude that with the 4-talker masker, noise reduction scheme processing provides a listening effort benefit in addition to any effect associated with improved intelligibility. Thus, the effect of the noise reduction scheme on listening effort incorporates more than can be explained by intelligibility alone, emphasizing the potential importance of measuring listening effort in addition to traditional speech reception measures.

Using the device-oriented subjective outcome (DOSO) scale to measure outcomes of different hearing aids.

OBJECTIVE: The device-oriented subjective outcome (DOSO) is a device-oriented questionnaire, intended to minimise the influence of personality on self-reported measures. The aim of this study was to provide normative data with 2015-era hearing aid technologies. DESIGN: This retrospective study evaluated data from records of three clinical trials. The DOSO was administered for the participants' own devices as a part of the intake and after using research devices in the field. STUDY SAMPLE: The DOSO data were collected from 132 experienced bilateral hearing aid wearers who participated in the clinical trials. RESULTS: The DOSO data collected with the participants' own devices were compared to the interim normative data collected between 2004 and 2005. The DOSO subscale scores from the participants' own devices were significantly higher than those from the interim norms, except Listening Effort subscale. To demonstrate the utility of the new norms, a separate set of DOSO data collected from the same participants after using research hearing aids were contrasted to the new normative data. After accounting for possible placebo effects, the DOSO data with research devices revealed additional self-reported benefit of technological advancements. CONCLUSIONS: Norms for the DOSO are recommended for evaluating hearing aids with more recent technologies.

Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.

Hearing can be elicited in response to bone as well as soft-tissue stimulation. However, the underlying mechanism of soft-tissue stimulation is under debate. It has been hypothesized that if skull vibrations were the underlying mechanism of hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation, then skull vibrations would be associated with hearing thresholds. However, if skull vibrations were not associated with hearing thresholds, an alternative mechanism is involved. In the present study, both skull vibrations and hearing thresholds were assessed in the same participants in response to bone (mastoid) and soft-tissue (neck) stimulation. The experimental group included five hearing-impaired adults in whom a bone-anchored hearing aid was implanted due to conductive or mixed hearing loss. Because the implant is exposed above the skin and has become an integral part of the temporal bone, vibration of the implant represented skull vibrations. To ensure that middle-ear pathologies of the experimental group did not affect overall results, hearing thresholds were also obtained in 10 participants with normal hearing in response to stimulation at the same sites. We found that the magnitude of the bone vibrations initiated by the stimulation at the two sites (neck and mastoid) detected by the laser Doppler vibrometer on the bone-anchored implant were linearly related to stimulus intensity. It was therefore possible to extrapolate the vibration magnitudes at low-intensity stimulation, where poor signal-to-noise ratio limited actual recordings. It was found that the vibration magnitude differences (between soft-tissue and bone stimulation) were not different than the hearing threshold differences at the tested frequencies. Results of the present study suggest that bone vibration magnitude differences can adequately explain hearing threshold differences and are likely to be responsible for the hearing sensation. Thus, the present results support the idea that bone and soft-tissue conduction could share the same underlying mechanism, namely the induction of bone vibrations. Studies with the present methodology should be continued in future work in order to obtain further insight into the underlying mechanism of activation of the hearing system.

Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.

OBJECTIVE: Binaural cues such as interaural level differences (ILDs) are used to organise auditory perception and to segregate sound sources in complex acoustical environments. In bilaterally fitted hearing aids, dynamic-range compression operating independently at each ear potentially alters these ILDs, thus distorting binaural perception and sound source segregation. DESIGN: A binaurally-linked model-based fast-acting dynamic compression algorithm designed to approximate the normal-hearing basilar membrane (BM) input-output function in hearing-impaired listeners is suggested. A multi-center evaluation in comparison with an alternative binaural and two bilateral fittings was performed to assess the effect of binaural synchronisation on (a) speech intelligibility and (b) perceived quality in realistic conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: 30 and 12 hearing impaired (HI) listeners were aided individually with the algorithms for both experimental parts, respectively. RESULTS: A small preference towards the proposed model-based algorithm in the direct quality comparison was found. However, no benefit of binaural-synchronisation regarding speech intelligibility was found, suggesting a dominant role of the better ear in all experimental conditions. CONCLUSION: The suggested binaural synchronisation of compression algorithms showed a limited effect on the tested outcome measures, however, linking could be situationally beneficial to preserve a natural binaural perception of the acoustical environment.

Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CI) and hearing aids (HA) have a gain control that allows the bimodal user to change the loudness. Due to differences in dynamic range between CI and HA, an equal change of the gains of the two devices results in different changes in loudness. The objective was to relate and individualise the step sizes of the loudness controls to obtain a similar perceptual effect in the two ears. DESIGN: We used loudness models parametrised for individual users to find a relation between the controls of the CI and the HA such that each step resulted in an equal change in loudness. We conducted loudness balancing experiments to validate the results. STUDY SAMPLE: Eleven bimodal users of whom six were tested in a prior study. RESULTS: The difference between the optimal gain from the loudness balancing procedure and actual gain was 3.3 dB when the new relation was applied. In contrast, the difference was 8 dB if equal step sized were applied at both sides. CONCLUSION: We can relate the controls such that each step results in a similar loudness difference.

An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.

OBJECTIVE: An important and often still unresolved problem of hearing devices such as assistive listening devices and hearing aids is limited user acceptance - a primary reason is poor conservation quality of the acoustic environment. Approaching a possible solution to this problem, an earpiece prototype is presented and evaluated. The prototype is individually and automatically calibrated in situ to provide acoustical transparency, i.e., achieving an audio perception alike to the open ear. DESIGN: A comprehensive evaluation was performed, comprising technical measurements on an advanced dummy head and listening tests, in which listeners directly compared sound perception through the prototype and a simulated open ear canal reference. STUDY SAMPLE: Ten normal hearing subjects, including five expert listeners, participated in the listening test. RESULTS: The technical evaluation verified good achievement of acoustical transparency. The psychoacoustic results showed that a reliable distinction between the two conditions presented was not possible for relevant communication sounds. CONCLUSION: The prototype can be described as an initial realisation of an acoustically transparent hearing system, i.e. a device that does not disturb the perception of external sounds. In further developments, the device can be considered as the basis for systems integrating high sound quality, hearing support and other desired modifications.

Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.

OBJECTIVES: Model-based hearing aid development considers the assessment of speech recognition using a master hearing aid (MHA). It is known that aided speech recognition in noise is related to cognitive factors such as working memory capacity (WMC). This relationship might be mediated by hearing aid experience (HAE). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of WMC and speech recognition with a MHA for listeners with different HAE. DESIGN: Using the MHA, unaided and aided 80% speech recognition thresholds in noise were determined. Individual WMC capacity was assed using the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT) and the Reading Span Test (RST). STUDY SAMPLE: Forty-nine hearing aid users with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss divided into three groups differing in HAE. RESULTS: Whereas unaided speech recognition did not show a significant relationship with WMC, a significant correlation could be observed between WMC and aided speech recognition. However, this only applied to listeners with HAE of up to approximately three years, and a consistent weakening of the correlation could be observed with more experience. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition scores obtained in acute experiments with an MHA are less influenced by individual cognitive capacity when experienced HA users are taken into account.

Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.

OBJECTIVE: Single-channel noise reduction (SCNR) and dynamic range compression (DRC) are important elements in hearing aids. Only relatively few studies have addressed interaction effects and typically used real hearing aids with limited knowledge about the integrated algorithms. Here the potential benefit of different combinations and integration of SCNR and DRC was systematically assessed. DESIGN: Ten different systems combining SCNR and DRC were implemented, including five serial arrangements, a parallel and two multiplicative approaches. In an instrumental evaluation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement and spectral contrast enhancement (SCE) were assessed. Quality ratings at 0 and +6 dB SNR, and speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise were measured using stationary and babble noise. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirteen young normal-hearing (NH) listeners and 12 hearing-impaired (HI) listeners participated. RESULTS: In line with an increased segmental SNR and spectral contrast compared to a serial concatenation, the parallel approach significantly reduced the perceived noise annoyance for both subject groups. The proposed multiplicative approaches could partly counteract increased speech distortions introduced by DRC and achieved the best overall quality for the HI listeners. CONCLUSIONS: For high SNRs well above the individual SRT, the specific combination of SCNR and DRC is perceptually relevant and the integrative approaches were preferred.