Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Value Health ; 24(10): 1402-1406, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34593162

RESUMEN

This study aims to estimate the theoretical excess expenditure that would be incurred by the Irish state-payer, should drugs be reimbursed at their original asking ("list") price rather than at a price at which the drug is considered cost-effective. In Ireland, all new drugs are evaluated by the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics. For this study, drugs that were submitted by pharmaceutical companies from 2012 to 2017 and considered not cost-effective at list price were reviewed. A total of 43 such drugs met our inclusion criteria, and their pharmacoeconomic evaluations were further assessed. The price at which the drug could be considered cost-effective (cost-effective price) at the upper cost-effectiveness threshold used in Ireland (€ 45 000/quality adjusted life-year) was estimated for 18 drugs with an available cost-effectiveness model. Then, for each drug, the list price and cost-effective price (both per unit) were both individually applied to 1 year of national real-world drug utilization data. This allowed the estimation of the expected expenditures under the assumptions of list price paid and cost-effective price paid. The resulting theoretical excess expenditure, the expenditure at list price minus the expenditure at the cost-effective price, was estimated to be €108.2 million. This estimate is theoretical because of the confidentiality of actual drug prices. The estimation is calculated using the list price and likely overestimates the actual excess expenditure, which would reduce to zero if cost-effective prices are agreed. Nevertheless, this estimate illustrates the importance of a process to assess the value of new drugs so that potential excess drug expenditure is identified.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Humanos , Irlanda , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Healthc (Amst) ; 8(4): 100447, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33129181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medicare used the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Model to mandate that hospitals in certain health care markets accept bundled payments for lower extremity joint replacement surgery. CJR has reduced spending with stable quality as intended among Medicare fee-for-service patients, but benefits could "spill over" to individuals insured through private health plans. Definitive evidence of spillovers remains lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes among privately insured individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: We used 2013-2017 Health Care Cost Institute claims for 418,016 privately insured individuals undergoing joint replacement in 75 CJR and 121 Non-CJR markets. Multivariable generalized linear models with hospital and market random effects and time fixed effects were used to analyze the association between CJR participation and changes in outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total episode spending, discharge to institutional post-acute care, and quality (e.g., surgical complications, readmissions). RESULTS: Patients in CJR and Non-CJR markets did not differ in total episode spending (difference of -$157, 95% CI -$1043 to $728, p = 0.73) or discharge to institutional post-acute care (difference of -1.1%, 95% CI -3.2%-1.0%, p = 0.31). Similarly, patients in the two groups did not differ in quality or other utilization outcomes. Findings were generally similar in stratified and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lack of evidence of cost or utilization spillovers from CJR to privately insured individuals. There may be limits in the ability of certain value-based payment reforms to drive broad changes in care delivery and patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Medicare/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/instrumentación , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos
3.
Fam Syst Health ; 38(3): 278-286, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32955284

RESUMEN

Introduction: Integrating behavioral health providers into pediatric primary care to provide behavioral health (BH) services is both effective and efficient; however, the impact of pediatric integrated services on the operational and financial outcomes of primary care provider (PCP) visits has not been thoroughly investigated. The present study examined whether length of practice integration predicts the relationship between BH content addressed in a PCP visit, visit length, and revenue generation. Method: A total of 1,209 pediatric encounters with 25 PCPs across 7 primary care offices in a predominantly rural health system were abstracted for the presence or absence of BH content, visit length, duration of integration, and revenue. χ2 analyses and the generalized linear model framework were used to address the study objectives. Results: Integration was associated with more PCP visits with a BH topic discussed at 6-11 months of integration but not at 14-24 months. Visits with a BH topic were longer than medical-only visits and shorter when a practice was integrated for 6-11 months but not at 14-24 months of integration. Public insurance and integration were associated with lower revenue generation per minute. Visit content was not associated with PCP revenue. Discussion: Results suggest a relationship between integration and the operational and financial outcomes of PCP visits. This study shows that initial efficiencies or improvements (e.g., time, cost, content) associated with integrating BH may be lost over time. Future studies should evaluate sustainability in relation to program impact. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicología Infantil/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Psicología Infantil/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
5.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(9): e011672, 2019 05 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31018741

RESUMEN

Background The attitudes of Department of Veterans Affairs ( VA ) cardiovascular clinicians toward the VA 's quality-of-care processes, clinical outcomes measures, and healthcare value are not well understood. Methods and Results Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with cardiovascular healthcare providers (n=31) at VA hospitals that were previously identified as high or low performers in terms of healthcare value. The interviews focused on VA providers' experiences with measures of processes, outcomes, and value (ie, costs relative to outcomes) of cardiovascular care. Most providers were aware of process-of-care measurements, received regular feedback generated from those data, and used that feedback to change their practices. Fewer respondents reported clinical outcomes measures influencing their practice, and virtually no participants used value data to inform their practice, although several described administrative barriers limiting high-cost care. Providers also expressed general enthusiasm for the VA 's quality measurement/improvement efforts, with relatively few criticisms about the workload or opportunity costs inherent in clinical performance data collection. There were no material differences in the responses of employees of low-performing versus high-performing VA medical centers. Conclusions Regardless of their medical center's healthcare value performance, most VA cardiovascular providers used feedback from process-of-care data to inform their practice. However, clinical outcomes data were used more rarely, and value-of-care data were almost never used. The limited use of outcomes data to inform healthcare practice raises concern that healthcare outcomes may have insufficient influence, whereas the lack of value data influencing cardiovascular care practices may perpetuate inefficiencies in resource use.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud para Veteranos/economía , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Estados Unidos , Servicios de Salud para Veteranos/normas
6.
Fam Syst Health ; 37(1): 74-83, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920263

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Under the current payment environment, the challenges to implementing and sustaining integrated behavioral health care are substantial. One key barrier for clinicians, administrators, researchers, and patients/families is a lack of clarity about who pays for integrated health care in the United States, and a lack of consensus about whether bending the health care cost curve is a fundamental goal of integrated care, and for whom. Clinicians caring for patients and families in integrated care settings would benefit from honing their "payment reform literacy skills" in order to advocate for integrated care. METHOD: This paper offers a primer on the current state of health care spending in the United States, an overview of public and private payers, and the challenges each faces in paying for integrated care. DISCUSSION: Future journal articles in the FSH Policy and Management Department will describe key payment policy and management opportunities for integrated care payment reform. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/métodos , Alfabetización en Salud , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/tendencias , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
7.
Chirurg ; 88(3): 219-225, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27995298

RESUMEN

Social interactions are hardly possible without trust. Medical and in particular surgical actions can change the lives of people directly and indirectly existentially. Thus, the relationship between doctor and patient is a special form of social interaction, and will be hard to find anywhere else. The nature of the doctor-patient relationship also determines the success of a treatment. The core and the importance of trust, as a central part of this relationship, will be reconstructed in the present paper. The increasing possibilities of information acquisition in modern societies, and the ever-present need for transparency, impact more and more on the doctor-patient relationship. At first glance, concepts of trust seem to be of secondary importance. The current developments regarding the remuneration of services in the medical system likewise bear the risk to increasingly determine the importance of trust in the doctor-patient relationship. However, it is necessary to delineate reliability from trust. Due to the conditions which are constitutive for the operational disciplines, a climate of trust, even in a modern information society, is more necessary than ever.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Cirujanos/economía , Cirujanos/psicología , Confianza/psicología , Competencia Clínica/economía , Competencia Clínica/normas , Comparación Transcultural , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso/normas
9.
Gastroenterology ; 150(4): 1009-18, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26907603
10.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 4(3): 228-34, 2013 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799712

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Comorbid psychiatric illness has been identified as a major driver of health care costs. The colocation of psychiatrists in primary care practices has been proposed as a model to improve mental health and medical care as well as a model to reduce health care costs. METHODS: Financial models were developed to determine the sustainability of colocation. RESULTS: We found that the population studied had substantial psychiatric and medical burdens, and multiple practice logistical issues were identified. CONCLUSION: The providers found the experience highly rewarding and colocation was financially sustainable under certain conditions. The colocation model was effective in identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Medicaid/economía , Enfermos Mentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Psiquiatría/economía , Comorbilidad , Control de Costos/métodos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/legislación & jurisprudencia , Medicaid/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud de las Minorías/economía , Salud de las Minorías/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Áreas de Pobreza , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/economía , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/organización & administración , Recursos Humanos
12.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) ; 61: 461-5, 2007 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17679835

RESUMEN

The current drama of antibiotic resistance has revived interest in phage therapy. In response to this challenge, a phage therapy center was established at our Institute in 2005 which accepts patients from Poland and abroad with antibiotic-resistant infections. We now present data showing that efficient phage therapy of staphylococcal infections is no longer a treatment of last resort (when all antibiotics fail), but allows for significant savings in the costs of healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Antibacterianos/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/virología , Fagos de Staphylococcus/genética , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tipificación de Bacteriófagos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de los Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Faringitis/economía , Faringitis/terapia , Polonia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Fagos de Staphylococcus/clasificación , Fagos de Staphylococcus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Epilepsia ; 48(5): 990-1001, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17319922

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission on Healthcare Policy in consultation with the World Health Organization (WHO) examined the applicability and usefulness of various measures for monitoring epilepsy healthcare services and systems across countries. The goal is to provide planners and policymakers with tools to analyze the impact of healthcare services and systems and evaluate efforts to improve performance. METHODS: Commission members conducted a systematic literature review and consulted with experts to assess the nature, strengths, and limitations of the treatment gap and resource availability measures that are currently used to assess the adequacy of epilepsy care. We also conducted a pilot study to determine the feasibility and applicability of using new measures to assess epilepsy care developed by the WHO including Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), responsiveness, and financial fairness. RESULTS: The existing measures that are frequently used to assess the adequacy of epilepsy care focus on structural or process factors whose relationship to outcomes are indirect and may vary across regions. The WHO measures are conceptually superior because of their breadth and connection to articulated and agreed upon outcomes for health systems. However, the WHO measures require data that are not readily available in developing countries and most developed countries as well. CONCLUSION: The epilepsy field should consider adopting the WHO measures in country assessments of epilepsy burden and healthcare performance whenever data permit. Efforts should be made to develop the data elements to estimate the measures.


Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Epilepsia/terapia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Proyectos Piloto , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Organización Mundial de la Salud
14.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; (35): 80-7, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16287891

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Economic analyses are increasingly important in medical research. Accuracy often requires that they include large, diverse populations, which requires data from multiple sources. The difficulty is in making the data comparable across different settings. This article focuses on how to create comparable measures of health care resource use and cost using data from seven health plans and delivery systems participating in the Cancer Research Network's HMOs Investigating Tobacco study. METHODS: We used a data inventory to identify variation in data capture across sites and used data dictionaries to develop algorithms for assigning standardized cost to the three major components of health care use: outpatient, inpatient, and pharmacy. RESULTS: The plans included in this study varied from fully integrated, closed-panel models to plans and delivery systems that include network or independent physician association components. Information derived from the data inventory and data dictionary instruments demonstrated a substantial variation in both the content and capture of data across all sites and across all components of usage. The methods we employed for cost allocation varied by usage component and were based on our ability to leverage the data points available to best reflect actual resource use. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of this article is the method of ascertaining, cataloging, and addressing the within- and between-plan differences in health care resource use. Second, the decisions we made to address the differences between health plans provide other researchers a starting point when creating a cost algorithm for multisite retrospective research.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
20.
Med Interface ; 8(5): 77-9, 83, 85, 1995 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10142788

RESUMEN

The author predicts that most providers will realize that the benefits of integrated health care delivery, which include lower overhead costs, increased marketshare, and secure income, are well worth the change toward market principles. He outlines some of the strategic and financial factors that should be considered when setting up an integrated health care delivery system.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Integración de Sistemas , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud/normas , Técnicas de Planificación , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA