Facilitating Virtual Visitation in Critical Care Units During a Pandemic.

Presence of support persons enhances patient and family satisfaction. The introduction of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted hospital operations and has reduced visitation. A virtual visitation program was implemented in critical care units to replicate visitation by video chat to ease stress on patients and family members to improve communication.

[Breakthroughs in global critical care medicine 2019].

OBJECTIVE: The following trends emerged in international critical care practice in 2019: increasing analysis to phenotypes of sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), increasing evidences of early initiating of vasopressors and antibiotics for septic shock, also including the early furosemide stress test for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). In addition, there are many significantly important trials with positive results: high dose vitamin C for septic shock, weaning strategy with pressure support ventilation (PSV) mode, tranexamic acid for patients with acute traumatic brain injury, and new monoclonal antibody for Ebola virus disease. And there are also negatives trials as following: individual mechanical ventilation, maximal recruitment open lung ventilation or early neuromuscular blockade for moderate-to-severe ARDS, N95 respirators preventing influenza, flexible family visit program against delirium or early sedation with dexmedetomidine to mechanically ventilated patients, intensive care unit (ICU) diary or nurse-led preventive psychological intervention against posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with mechanical ventilation, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhsTM) in patients with sepsis-associated coagulopathy, and so on. Further investigations should be focus on the phenotype analysis, by which individualized management fitting for specific pathophysiologic and immune characters for each patient could be clarified.

Management of prolonged epileptic seizures and status epilepticus in palliative care patients.

Prolonged seizures and status epilepticus (SE) are relevant problems in palliative care. Timely recognition and effective early treatment with first- and second-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may prevent unnecessary hospitalizations. Seizures should be recognized and addressed like any other symptom that causes discomfort or reduces quality of life. Use of alternative AED administration routes (buccal, intranasal, or subcutaneous) may offer possibilities for effective and individualized AED therapy, even during the last days of life. In hospice or home care, however, also intravenous treatment is possible via vascular access devices for long-term use. Aggressive unlimited intensive care unit (ICU) treatment of refractory SE in palliative patients is mostly not indicated. At worst, intensive care can be futile and possibly harmful: death in the ICU is often preceded by long and aggressive treatments. Metastatic cancer, old age, high severity of acute illness, overall frailty, poor functional status before hospital admission, and the presence of severe comorbidities all increase the probability of poor outcome of intensive care. When several of these factors are present, consideration of withholding intensive care may be in the patient's best interests. Anticipated outcomes influence patients' preferences. A majority of patients with a limited life expectancy because of an incurable disease would not want aggressive treatment, if the anticipated outcome was survival but with severe functional impairment. Doctors' perceptions about their patients' wishes are often incorrect, and therefore, advance care planning including seizure management should be done early in the course of the disease. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures".

Changing paradigms in metabolic support and nutrition therapy during critical illness.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the most recent advances in acute metabolic care and critical care nutrition. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has demonstrated unknown consequences of high protein and amino acid administration in the early phase of ICU stay associated with dysregulated glucagon release leading to hepatic amino acid breakdown and suggested adverse effects on autophagy and long-term outcome. Progress has been made to measure body composition in the ICU. Refeeding hypophosphatemia and refeeding syndrome are common during critical illness, phosphate monitoring is essential after the start of nutrition therapy, and caloric restriction is recommendable in these patients.In recent studies, enteral nutrition is no longer superior to parenteral nutrition and signals of harm using the enteral route in shock have been suggested. However, during extracorporeal life support, enteral nutrition seems well tolerated. Intermittent or bolus enteral feeding seems an exciting concept concerning its potential anabolic effects. Studies on vitamin C, thiamine, and corticosteroid combinations suggest potential to improve outcome. SUMMARY: These new findings will probably change the practice of metabolic and nutrition therapy in critical illness and challenge paradigms advocated for long.

Nutrition in the ICU: new trends versus old-fashioned standard enteral feeding?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The narrative review aims to summarize the relevant studies from the last 2 years and provide contextual information to understand findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent ICU studies have provided insight in the pathophysiology and time course of catabolism, anabolic resistance, and metabolic and endocrine derangements interacting with the provision of calories and proteins.Early provision of high protein intake and caloric overfeeding may confer harm. Refeeding syndrome warrants caloric restriction and to identify patients at risk phosphate monitoring is mandatory.Infectious complications of parenteral nutrition are associated with overfeeding. In recent studies enteral nutrition is no longer superior over parenteral nutrition.Previously reported benefits of glutamine, selenium, and fish oil seem to have vanished in recent studies; however, studies on vitamin C, thiamine, and corticosteroid combinations show promising results. SUMMARY: Studies from the last 2 years will have marked impact on future nutritional support strategies and practice guidelines for critical care nutrition as they challenge several old-fashioned concepts.

Estrategias para la mejora del cuidado del paciente oncológico: Resultados del proyecto SHARE (Sesiones interHospitalarias de Análisis y Revisión en Enfermería) / Strategies for improving care of oncologic patients: SHARE Project results

El tratamiento oncológico supone una gran carga para el paciente y su entorno familiar que requiere una individualización por parte del personal sanitario. Las enfermeras son las responsables de la coordinación de los cuidados y las profesionales más cercanas al paciente y a su familia; sin embargo, en España no existen aún protocolos de actuación unificados para la atención a los pacientes oncológicos. La Sociedad Española de Enfermería Oncológica desarrolló entre el año 2012 y el 2014 el proyecto SHARE con el objetivo de establecer estrategias que mejoren la calidad de vida y los cuidados enfermeros en el paciente oncológico y su familia. Este proyecto se llevó a cabo en 3 fases. Primero, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica para identificar las estrategias, intervenciones y herramientas que mejoren el cuidado del paciente oncológico. En una segunda fase se consensuaron estas intervenciones y en una tercera fase otro grupo de expertos en cuidados oncológicos las categorizó, determinando las más prioritarias y factibles para su implementación. Se identificaron 3 acciones estratégicas: disponer de un profesional de Enfermería de referencia para el seguimiento de manera presencial o telefónica, diseñar programas de educación terapéutica con protocolos específicos y garantizar la formación específica de los profesionales. Estas acciones están orientadas a mejorar la atención sanitaria y la calidad de vida de los pacientes oncológicos y sus familias a través del desarrollo de roles enfermeros avanzados, con un mayor grado de autonomía. Esto sitúa a las enfermeras como gestoras y coordinadoras del cuidado integral del paciente oncológico

Cancer treatment is a major burden for the patient and its family that requires an individualized management by healthcare professionals. Nurses are in charge of coordinating care and are the closest healthcare professionals to patient and family; however, in Spain, there are not standard protocols yet for the management of oncology patients. The Spanish Oncology Nursing Society developed between 2012 and 2014 the SHARE project, with the aim of establishing strategies to improve quality of life and nursing care in oncology patients. It was developed in 3 phases. First, a literature search and review was performed to identify nursing strategies, interventions and tools to improve cancer patients’ care. At the second stage, these interventions were agreed within a group of oncology nursing experts; and at the third phase, a different group of experts in oncology care categorized the interventions to identify the ones with highest priority and most feasible to be implemented. As a result, 3 strategic actions were identified to improve nursing care during cancer treatment: To provide a named nurse to carry out the follow up process by attending to the clinic or telephonic consultation, develop therapeutic education with adapted protocols for each tumor type and treatment and ensure specific training for nurses on the management of the cancer patients. Strategic actions proposed in this paper aim to improve cancer patients’ healthcare and quality of life through the development of advanced nursing roles based on a higher level of autonomy, situating nurses as care coordinators to assure an holistic care in oncology patients

Models of Care Delivery for Families of Critically Ill Children: An Integrative Review of International Literature.

UNLABELLED: Critical illness in children is a life changing event for the child, their parents, caregivers and wider family. There is a need to design and evaluate models of care that aim to implement family-centred care to support more positive outcomes for critically ill children and their families. Due to a gap in knowledge on the impact of such models, the present review was conducted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles written in English that focused on children hospitalised for an acute, unexpected, sudden critical illness, such as that requiring an intensive care admission; and addressed the implementation of a model of care in a paediatric acute care hospital setting. SAMPLE: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The models of care implemented were associated with positive changes such as reduced parental anxiety and improved communication between parents/caregivers and health professionals. However, no model provided intervention throughout each phase of care to (or post) hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Models of care applying family-centred care principles targeting critically ill children and their families can create positive changes in care delivery for the family. However a model which provides continuity across the span of care is required. IMPLICATIONS: There is need to describe how best to design, implement and sustain models of care for critically ill children and their families. The success of any intervention implementation will be dependent on the comprehensiveness of the strategy for implementation, the relevance to the context and setting, and engagement with key stakeholders.

Therapeutic Use of Music and Television in Neurocritical Care: A Practice Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Although health care providers often play music via radio, or play television, to calm and soothe patients, limited research is available to guide practice. METHOD: This study used a 17-item practice survey that was distributed electronically to neurocritical care society members in July 2014. Responses were collated and analyzed using SAS (Version 9.3). RESULTS: There were 118 completed responses, including from 71 attending physicians, 9 resident or fellow physicians, 30 nurses, and 8 affiliate professional members. The majority of respondents sometimes or always play music (65%) and agree that music is therapeutic (70%). However, there was no clear practice pattern regarding when or why music or TV should be used as an intervention in the neurocritical care unit. CONCLUSION: The use of music and TV is a common intervention in the neurocritical care unit but lacks a strong scientific foundation and is associated with a high practice variance.

¿Estamos los intensivistas dejando de creer en los beneficios de la nutrición? / Are intensivists losing faith in the benefits of nutrition?

No disponible

Setting the vision: applied patient-reported outcomes and smart, connected digital healthcare systems to improve patient-centered outcomes prediction in critical illness.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prediction models in critical illness are generally limited to short-term mortality and uncommonly include patient-centered outcomes. Current outcome prediction tools are also insensitive to individual context or evolution in healthcare practice, potentially limiting their value over time. Improved prognostication of patient-centered outcomes in critical illness could enhance decision-making quality in the ICU. RECENT FINDINGS: Patient-reported outcomes have emerged as precise methodological measures of patient-centered variables and have been successfully employed using diverse platforms and technologies, enhancing the value of research in critical illness survivorship and in direct patient care. The learning health system is an emerging ideal characterized by integration of multiple data sources into a smart and interconnected health information technology infrastructure with the goal of rapidly optimizing patient care. We propose a vision of a smart, interconnected learning health system with integrated electronic patient-reported outcomes to optimize patient-centered care, including critical care outcome prediction. SUMMARY: A learning health system infrastructure integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes may aid in the management of critical illness-associated conditions and yield tools to improve prognostication of patient-centered outcomes in critical illness.

[Significance of selenium in the pathogenesis and therapy of cardiovascular diseases and those requiring intensive care]. / A szelén szerepe a cardiovascularis és intenzív kezelést igénylo betegségek létrejöttében és kezelésében.

Selenium deficiency results in profound changes in cellular defence mechanisms against oxidative stress, which plays an important role in the development of cardiovascular disease and the associated risk factors. Increased formation and decreased elimination of reactive oxygen radicals contribute to the complicated mechanisms of sepsis and related disorders. Use of selenium in prevention and treatment of the above mentioned conditions is not a new idea, but controversial data were published in relation to both fields recently. The aim of the present review is to summarize the most important results related to this area.

Parenteral nutrition in the intensive care unit.

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are unable to nourish themselves orally. In addition, critical illness increases nutrient requirements as well as alters metabolism. Typically, ICU patients rapidly become malnourished unless they are provided with involuntary feeding either through a tube inserted into the GI tract, called enteral nutrition (EN), or directly into the bloodstream, called parenteral nutrition (PN). Between the 1960s and the 1980s, PN was the modality of choice and the premise was that if some is good, more is better, which led to overfeeding regimens called hyperalimentation. Later, the dangers of overfeeding, hyperglycemia, fatty liver, and increased sepsis associated with PN became recognized. In contrast, EN was not associated with these risks and it gradually became the modality of choice in the ICU. However, ICU patients in whom the gastrointestinal tract was nonfunctional (i.e., gut failure) required PN to avoid malnutrition. In addition, EN was shown, on average, to not meet nutrient requirements, and underfeeding was recognized to increase complications because of malnutrition. Hence, the balanced perspective has been reached of using EN when possible but avoiding underfeeding by supplementing with PN when required. This new role for PN is currently being debated and studied. In addition, the relative merits and needs for protein, carbohydrates, lipids, and micronutrients are areas of study.

Thyroid axis function and dysfunction in critical illness.

Acutely ill patients typically present with low circulating T3 and increased reverse T3. When illness is severe and prolonged, also pulsatile TSH secretion and circulating T4 levels are low. This constellation of changes within the thyroid axis is referred to as the low T3 syndrome or non-thyroidal illness syndrome (NTI), and comprises both peripheral and central alterations in the thyroid axis. Acute alterations are dominated by changes in thyroid hormone binding, in thyroid hormone uptake by the cell and in the activity of the type-1 and type-3 deiodinase enzymes. Prolonged critical illness is associated with a neuroendocrine dysfunction characterized by suppressed hypothalamic thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) expression, resulting in reduced stimulation of the thyrotropes whereby thyroidal hormone release is impaired. During prolonged critical illness, several tissue responses could be interpreted as compensatory to low thyroid hormone availability, such as increased expression of monocarboxylate transporters, upregulation of type 2 deiodinase activity and increased sensitivity at the receptor level. Whether the low T3 syndrome should be treated and which compound should be used remains to be further studied.

Comparing clinician ratings of the quality of palliative care in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: There are numerous challenges to successfully integrating palliative care in the intensive care unit. Our primary goal was to describe and compare the quality of palliative care delivered in an intensive care unit as rated by physicians and nurses working in that intensive care unit. DESIGN: Multisite study using self-report questionnaires. SETTING: Thirteen hospitals throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 188 physicians working in critical care (attending physicians, critical care fellows, resident physicians) and 289 critical care nurses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinicians provided overall ratings of the care delivered by either nurses or physicians in their intensive care unit for each of seven domains of intensive care unit palliative care using a 0-10 scale (0 indicating the worst possible and 10 indicating the best possible care). Analyses included descriptive statistics to characterize measurement characteristics of the ten items, paired Wilcoxon tests comparing item ratings for the domain of symptom management with all other item ratings, and regression analyses assessing differences in ratings within and between clinical disciplines. We used p < .001 to denote statistical significance to address multiple comparisons. The ten items demonstrated good content validity with few missing responses or ceiling or floor effects. Items receiving the lowest ratings assessed spiritual support for families, emotional support for intensive care unit clinicians, and palliative-care education for intensive care unit clinicians. All but two items were rated significantly lower than the item assessing symptom management (p < .001). Nurses rated nursing care significantly higher (p < .001) than physicians rated physician care in five domains. In addition, although nurses and physicians gave comparable ratings to palliative care delivered by nurses, nurses' and physicians' ratings of physician care were significantly different with nurse ratings of this care lower than physician ratings on all but one domain. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the content validity of the ten overall rating items and supports the need for improvement in several aspects of palliative care, including spiritual support for families, emotional support for clinicians, and clinician education about palliative care in the intensive care unit. Furthermore, our findings provide some preliminary support for surveying intensive care unit clinicians as one way to assess the quality of palliative care in the intensive care unit.