Prescribing Performance Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Using a Composite Medication Indicator: ANZACS-QI 24.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines previously recommended use of dual antiplatelet therapy, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) and beta blockers (five classes of drugs) in patients without contraindications or intolerance after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent guidelines have taken a more nuanced view regarding the use of ACEI/ARB and beta blockers. Our aim was to develop a composite post-discharge medication indicator, based on available evidence, to support quality improvement. METHODS: 4,112 consecutive post-ACS patients who underwent coronary angiography and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment in 2015-16 were recorded in the All New Zealand ACS Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) registry. Patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting were excluded. Three composite indicator algorithms that took into account known contraindications/intolerances were compared across NZ District Health Boards (DHBs): RESULTS: Overall and individual DHB performance was highest (74%, DHB range 52-84%) when reported using the NHFA/CSANZ indicator, and slightly lower (69%, DHB range 48-78%) on the ANZACS-QI indicator. Performance was lowest using the older five-drug-class indicator (65%, DHB range 48-77%). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a composite post-discharge medication indicator appropriate for use in identifying gaps in evidence-based management across NZ, which is now being reported regularly to DHBs.

[Preparation for and care after medical rehabilitation using the example of psychosomatic rehabilitation]. / Vorbereitung und Nachbereitung der medizinischen Rehabilitation am Beispiel der psychosomatischen Rehabilitation.

For successful reintegration into working life after inpatient medical and psychosomatic rehabilitation, it is necessary that treatment efforts prior to inpatient rehabilitation treatment, during the medical care itself, and after rehabilitation are distributed appropriately. Ideally, in addition to adequate psychotherapeutic treatment by established therapists/doctors, preparation for the upcoming rehabilitation should concentrate on helping patients lose their fear and also to shed light upon the objectives of a psychosomatic rehabilitation with special emphasis on vocational rehabilitation. Shortly after psychosomatic rehabilitation, aftercare supports, in particular, the transfer of the rehabilitation results and reintegration into working life. However, only a fraction of the patients are reached by this aftercare offer. For rehabilitation, patients with special job problems, migrants, or long-term unemployed persons, case management is proposed, should aftercare not be sufficient.

[Epidemiology and perspectives in traumatology of the elderly]. / Epidemiologie und Perspektiven der Alterstraumatologie.

Corresponding to the demographic development, fractures of the humerus, wrist, or hip will occur noticeably more often during the next four decades. The number of patients with hip fractures will increase to 170% of present-day numbers, and in the age group >80 years to 250%. Trauma surgical departments should train their staff as well as adapt their workflows and ambient conditions to this demanding clientele to be prepared for these changes. For the elderly, a fracture may lead to need for permanent home care, which is why postoperative transfer to ambulatory care is especially important. The expected cost progression in traumatology of the elderly may be moderated by the conjunction of inpatient and ambulatory care, the utilization of synergies among the different service types, and by implementation of prophylaxis for osteoporosis and falls.

Models of care for survivors of childhood cancer.

With improvements in therapy for childhood cancer, the expectation that most childhood cancer patients will survive and enter adulthood is a reality. There is clear evidence that survivors are at risk for adverse health-related long-term sequelae associated with their cancer and its treatment, requiring appropriate health care resources. What is less clear is how this health care should optimally be delivered. We review the functional and operational needs for long-term follow-up for childhood cancer survivors and present alternatives for models of care. Programs for childhood cancer survivors should provide mechanisms for monitoring and management of late effects, as well as support and advocacy for addressing psychosocial issues, health education, and assistance with financial concerns. Access to research is an important component as clinical care and research are integrally related. A multidisciplinary model that provides continuity of care throughout the disease course is optimal, providing transitions from acute anti-neoplastic therapy to follow-up and primary care, as well as from pediatric care to adult-oriented care. There is no single best model of care for all childhood cancer survivors. In evaluating different models, considerations include available resources as well as the particular cancer population being served. Not all survivors require the same level of services and the service level requirement for individual patients may change with time. As outcome research progresses for childhood cancer survivors, methodological issues of optimal health care delivery for this population deserve to be the subject of such research.