Influência do tratamento do substrato com plasma não térmico na resistência de união em cimentação adesiva / Influence of the substrate treatment with non-thermal plasma on bond strength of adhesive cementation

Objetivo: avaliar a influência do tratamento de superfície com plasma não térmico de argônio (PLA) na resistência de união de cimentos resinosos ao esmalte, à dentina e à cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio. Observar, no esmalte e na dentina, através de espectroscopia de infravermelho por transformada de Fourier (FTIR) os compostos inorgânicos e da cromatografia gasosa a alteração dos compostos orgânicos voláteis nas condições experimentais propostas. Material e Método: Foram avaliados 3 cimentos resinosos: Variolink Esthetic LC e N (Ivoclar Vivadent), e Panavia V5 (Kuraray). Foram utilizados 240 dentes bovinos, dos quais 150 tiveram a superfície do esmalte exposta e 90 a de dentina. Foram obtidas 150 lâminas de cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio (12 x 14 x 0,5 mm). Os grupos foram divididos de acordo com o tratamento de superfície e o substrato. Os tratamentos para as superfícies de esmalte e dentina foram: EA (esmalte/ácido fosfórico); DA (dentina/ácido fosfórico); EPS (esmalte/PLA 30 s); EPM (esmalte/PLA 1 min); DPS (dentina/PLA 30 s); EAPS (esmalte/ácido fosfórico/PLA 30 s) e EAPM (esmalte/ácido fosfórico/PLA 1 min); e, DAPS (dentina/ácido fosfórico/PLA 30 s). Os tratamentos para as superfícies da cerâmica foram: CA (cerâmica/ácido fluorídrico), CPS (cerâmica/PLA 30 s); CPM (cerâmica/PLA 1 min); CAPS (cerâmica/ácido fluorídrico/PLA 30 s) e CAPM (cerâmica/ácido fluorídrico/PLA 1 min). Posterior aos tratamentos, cilindros dos cimentos resinosos (0,8 mm/1,5 mm) foram confeccionados sobre as superfícies dos substratos. Após 48 h, os espécimes foram submetidos ao ensaio mecânico de microcisalhamento (10 Kgf/1 mm/min) até a fratura. A área fraturada foi analisada em estereomicroscópio. As superfícies tratadas e a interface adesiva foram analisadas por Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV). Através do FTIR foram observados os espectros de amostras tratadas de esmalte e dentina. Os dados da resistência de união foram submetidos à análise estatística ANOVA e teste de Tukey (5%). Resultados: Para o esmalte os tratamentos de superfície não apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante entre si; para a dentina o grupo DPS apresentou os maiores valores de resistência de união; e, para a cerâmica o tratamento CA apresentou os maiores valores de resistência de união. Para esmalte e dentina, o FTIR, mostrou alterações do conteúdo da água, carbonato e fosfato e a cromatografia gasosa das substâncias orgânicas voláteis. Conclusão: O tratamento de superfície com PLA não influencia a resistência de união de cimentos resinosos ao esmalte, aumenta à dentina e diminui ao dissilicato de lítio. As análises observacionais no FTIR sugerem que o plasma não altera compostos do esmalte e da dentina(AU)

Objective: to evaluate the influence of surface treatment with non - thermal argon plasma (PLA) on bond strength of resin cements to enamel, dentin and lithium disilicate glass ceramic; and, to observe, through Fourier Transform Modified Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), the inorganic compounds and through gas chromatography, the alteration of the volatile organic compounds, on the enamel and dentin, under the experimental conditions. Material and Method: Three resin cements: Variolink Esthetic LC and N (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Panavia V5 (Kuraray) were evaluated. Twenty hundred and forty bovine teeth were used, among which 150 specimens with enamel surface exposure and 90 with dentine exposure. One hundred and fifty lithium disilicate glass ceramic slices (12 x 14 x 0.5 mm) were obtained. The groups were divided according to the substrate and surface treatment. The treatments for enamel and dentin surfaces were: EA (enamel / phosphoric acid); DA (dentin / phosphoric acid); EPS (enamel / PLA 30 s); EPM (enamel / PLA 1 min); DPS (dentin / PLA 30 s); EAPS (enamel / phosphoric acid / PLA 30 s) and EAPM (enamel / phosphoric acid / PLA 1 min); and, DAPS (dentin / phosphoric acid / PLA 30 s). The treatments for the ceramic surfaces were: CA (ceramic / hydrofluoric acid), CPS (ceramic / PLA 30 s); CPM (ceramic / PLA 1 min); CAPS (ceramic / hydrofluoric acid / PLA 30s) and CAPM (ceramic / hydrofluoric acid / PLA 1 min). After the treatments, resin cement cylinders (0.8 mm / 1.5 mm) were built on the substrate's surfaces. After 48 h storage bond strength tests (µSBS) were performed in a universal testing machine (10 Kgf / 1 mm / min) until failure to fracture, and failure mode was analyzed under a stereomicroscope. The treated surfaces and the adhesive interface were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The FTIR was used to observe the spectra of enamel and dentin treated samples. Bond strength data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (5%). Results: for the enamel there was not a statistically significant difference among surface treatments; for the dentin, the DPS group presented the highest bond strength; and for the ceramic the AC treatment presented the highest values of bond strength. For the enamel and the dentin samples, the FTIR observations showed changes in water, carbonate and phosphate contents and the gas chromatography in the volatile organic substances. Conclusion: Surface treatment with PLA does not influence the bond strength of resin cements to the enamel, increases the bonding to dentin and decreases to the lithium disilicate. Observational analysis on FTIR suggest that non-thermal plasma does not alter enamel and dentin compounds(AU)

In-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

Dentinal hypersensitivity is a common dental complaint, especially in periodontal patients. It is believed to be mediated by a hydrodynamic mechanism in which various stimuli result in increased fluid flow in dentinal tubules, thereby generating action potentials in associated nerve fibers. Although it is often perceived as mild discomfort by the patient, it can be severe. A variety of interventions has been used, although few have been subjected to rigorous study. This article surveys those in-office treatments that are available, and suggests directions for research so that clinicians may treat patients based on best evidence. Until such evidence is available, it seems prudent to employ therapies that are least likely to cause harm and are reversible.

Effect of capsaicin treatment or inferior alveolar nerve resection on dentine formation and calcitonin gene-related peptide- and substance P-immunoreactive nerve fibres in rat molar pulp.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether decreased sensory innervation induced by capsaicin treatment or axotomy of the inferior alveolar nerve has an effect upon dentine formation in the rat first molar. Dentine formation was visualized by intravital injection of Procion brilliant Red H8BS and denervation was verified immunohistochemically for the neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P. The observation times were 6 weeks for the capsaicin-treated group and 11 days for the axotomized group. Capsaicin injections caused a consistent reduction in numbers of CGRP- and substance P-immunoreactive fibres in the pulps and a somewhat smaller reduction in the periodontal tissues. Unilateral axotomy of the inferior alveolar nerve induced an almost complete loss of immunoreactive fibres in the pulp and in the mesial gingiva of the first molar. Dentine formation at the mesial pulp horn and at the central pulp floor was significantly reduced in both groups compared to controls. The results suggest that sensory neuropeptides such as CGRP and substance P may play a part in dentine formation.