Use total portosystemic shunt to rescue an emergency PNF with intractable hypotension: A case report.

RATIONALE: Living donor allogeneic liver transplantation is a surgical treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease, wherein a healthy liver is implanted in the patient, facilitating the recovery of the liver function in patients with end-stage liver disease. However, primary nonfunction (PNF) may occur as a result of this procedure. PATIENT CONCERNS: A case of an 65-year-old Asian male with a medical history of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is described. Intractable hypotension occurred after open hepatic portal anastomosis, and large doses of vasoactive substances did not improve the condition. DIAGNOSIS: PNF was diagnosed during surgery and it caused intractable hypotension. INTERVENTIONS: we promptly used the total portosystemic shunt to achieve a successful rescue. OUTCOMES: The strengthening of perioperative management and active treatment allowed second liver transplantation and anhepatic phase of up to 10 hours, following which the patient was rescued. LESSONS: The lesson we have learned is that total portosystemic shunt composited with careful anesthesia management can rescue the event of PNF with intractable hypotension in liver transplantation surgery. At the same time, we give attention to blood pressure, electrocardiogram, albumin, calcium, potassium, acidosis, coagulopathy, anti-infection, and protection of vital organs is essential for successful retransplant outcomes.

Update in the Treatment of the Complications of Cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis consists of 2 main stages: compensated and decompensated, the latter defined by the development/presence of ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy. The survival rate is entirely different, depending on the stage. Treatment with nonselective ß-blockers prevents decompensation in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension, changing the previous paradigm based on the presence of varices. In patients with acute variceal hemorrhage at high risk of failure with standard treatment (defined as those with a Child-Pugh score of 10-13 or those with a Child-Pugh score of 8-9 with active bleeding at endoscopy), a pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves the mortality rate and has become the standard of care in many centers. In patients with bleeding from gastrofundal varices, retrograde transvenous obliteration (in those with a gastrorenal shunt) and/or variceal cyanoacrylate injection have emerged as alternatives to TIPS. In patients with ascites, emerging evidence suggests that TIPS might be used earlier, before strict criteria for refractory ascites are met. Long-term albumin use is under assessment for improving the prognosis of patients with uncomplicated ascites and confirmatory studies are ongoing. Hepatorenal syndrome is the least common cause of acute kidney injury in cirrhosis, and first-line treatment is the combination of terlipressin and albumin. Hepatic encephalopathy has a profound impact on the quality of life of patients with cirrhosis. Lactulose and rifaximin are first- and second-line treatments for hepatic encephalopathy, respectively. Newer therapies such as L-ornithine L-aspartate and albumin require further assessment.

Portosystemic shunt is an effective treatment for complications of portal hypertension in hepatic myeloid metaplasia and improves nutritional status.

In patients affected by myelofibrosis with hepatic myeloid metaplasia (HMM), portal hypertension (PHT) complications may develop. In this case series, we analysed the efficacy and safety of transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of PHT-related complications and its effects on the nutritional status. Six patients were evaluated and the average follow-up period after TIPS was 33 (IQR 5) months. None of the patients developed hepatic failure, nor any recurrence of variceal bleeding was recorded. No additional paracentesis or endoscopic prophylactic treatment for PHT-related complications were required. In all subjects, the average dose of diuretics was almost halved three months after TIPS. Three patients died during the follow-up, but none for liver-related causes. All patients showed an improvement in the global nutritional status. In conclusion, TIPS represent an effective and safe treatment option for patients affected by complications of PHT secondary to HMM and drives to an improvement of the nutritional status.

Timing and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with pyrrolizidine alkaloid-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

There is no specific treatment for pyrrolizidine alkaloid-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (PA-HSOS). It is not clear when transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) should be implemented in PA-HSOS patients. This study aimed to evaluate the timing of TIPS using total bilirubin (TBIL) as a measure, and to investigate efficacy of TIPS. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 PA-HSOS patients, among whom 4 patients had received TIPS (TIPS group), and the remaining patients were assigned to the internal medicine group. In the TIPS group, the TBIL level before TIPS was 84.4 ± 45.2 µmol/L (> 3 mg/dL), and TBIL levels were increased to different degrees after TIPS. With the extension of time, serum TBIL levels gradually decreased, and no liver failure occurred. With regards to the short-term outcomes, 3 patients recovered, 1 developed chronic illness and 0 died in the TIPS group. Moreover, 0 patients recovered, 5 developed chronic illness and 1 died in the internal medicine group. The rank sum test of group design revealed significant differences in clinical outcomes (P = 0.02). It was suggested that when the internal medicine effect of PA-HSOS patients is poor, TIPS should be considered, which is no trestricted to the limit of 3 mg/dL TBIL. It was also found TIPS effectively promote the recovery of liver function and reduce the occurrence of chronicity.

Anticoagulation and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for the Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation as the mainstay of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) treatment in cirrhosis. However, because of the heterogeneity of PVT, anticoagulation alone does not always achieve satisfactory results. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate an individualized management algorithm using a wait-and-see strategy (i.e., no treatment), anticoagulation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to treat PVT in cirrhosis. METHODS: Between February 2014 and June 2018, 396 consecutive patients with cirrhosis with nonmalignant PVT were prospectively included in a tertiary care center, of which 48 patients (12.1%) were untreated, 63 patients (15.9%) underwent anticoagulation, 88 patients (22.2%) underwent TIPS, and 197 patients (49.8%) received TIPS plus post-TIPS anticoagulation. The decision of treatment option mainly depends on the stage of liver disease (symptomatic portal hypertension or not) and degree and extension of thrombus. RESULTS: During a median 31.7 months of follow-up period, 312 patients (81.3%) achieved partial (n = 25) or complete (n = 287) recanalization, with 9 (3.1%) having rethrombosis, 64 patients (16.2%) developed major bleeding (anticoagulation-related bleeding in 7 [1.8%]), 88 patients (22.2%) developed overt hepatic encephalopathy, and 100 patients (25.3%) died. In multivariate competing risk regression models, TIPS and anticoagulation were associated with a higher probability of recanalization. Long-term anticoagulation using enoxaparin or rivaroxaban rather than warfarin was associated with a decreased risk of rethrombosis and an improved survival, without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, the presence of complete superior mesenteric vein thrombosis was associated with a lower recanalization rate, increased risk of major bleeding, and poor prognosis. DISCUSSION: In patients with cirrhosis with PVT, the individualized treatment algorithm achieves a high-probability recanalization, with low rates of portal hypertensive complications and adverse events.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome associated with consumption of Gynura segetum.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) associated with consumption of Gynura segetum (GS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 9 consecutive patients with GS-related HSOS who were refractory to supportive treatment and underwent TIPS at our institution between January 2014 and September 2019. The patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy, including TIPS complications and changes in portosystemic pressure gradient (PPG), ascites, total bilirubin, liver size and portal vein diameter. RESULTS: TIPS procedures were performed successfully in the 9 patients, and no technically-related complications due to the TIPS procedure were recorded. The PPG was improved by TIPS in all patients (mean PPG before TIPS, 30.4 ± 5.2 vs. 13.0 ± 4.1 mm Hg post-TIPS, P = 0.008). One patient who was lost to follow-up, whereas the remaining 8 patients survived with a median follow-up period of 12 months (range 5-39 months). Although the total bilirubin was significantly increased 5-7 days after TIPS compared with that before the procedure (3.57 ± 1.58 vs. 4.82 ± 2.06 mg/dl, P = 0.017), it returned to baseline levels at 1-month follow-up (3.53 ± 2.72 vs. 4.82 ± 2.06 mg/dl, P = 0.401). The patients experienced complete resolution or noticeable reduction of ascites (P < 0.001), significant reduction of liver size (16.7 ± 2.2 vs. 13.7 ± 1.7 cm, P = 0.018), and significant enlargement of the portal trunk (10.7 ± 2.5 vs. 13.4 ± 2.4 mm, P = 0.017) after TIPS compared to the pre-TIPS state. CONCLUSION: TIPS may offer a potentially useful treatment for the GS-related HSOS.

Motor Cortex Mapping in Patients With Hepatic Myelopathy After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: As a special movement disorder, hepatic myelopathy (HM) is characterized by spastic paraperesis and may be secondary to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The prediction and diagnosis of HM is difficult due to largely unknown neuropathological underpinnings and a lack of specific biomarkers. We aimed to delve into the alterations in motor system of HM patients' brain and their potential clinical implication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with HM and 23 without HM after TIPS and 24 demographically matched healthy controls were enrolled. High-spatial-resolution structural imaging and functional data at rest were acquired. Motor areas were included as seed regions for functional connectivity analysis. Then, we performed brain volume analysis. RESULTS: We found decreased right supplementary motor area (SMA)-seeded functional connectivity with bilateral insula, thalamus and midbrain, left cerebellum and middle temporal gyrus, and right middle cingulate gyrus in HM compared to non-HM patients (p < 0.001). The right insula revealed decreased volume (p < 0.001), and white matter volume reduced in the right corona radiata beneath the right SMA (p < 0.001) in HM relative to non-HM patients. Furthermore, the strength of right SMA-seeded connectivity with insula was positively correlated with folic acid level in HM patients (r = 0.60, p = 0.03), showing an accuracy of 0.87 to distinguish HM from non-HM. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the HM-specific dysconnectivity with an anatomical basis, and its correlation with laboratory findings and diagnostic value. Detecting these abnormalities might help to predict and diagnose post-TIPS HM.

Safety and efficacy of angiographic occlusion of duodenal varices as an alternative to TIPS: review of 32 cases.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/RATIONALE OF STUDY: Analyze safety and efficacy of angiographic-occlusion-with-sclerotherapy/embolotherapy-without-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt (TIPS) for duodenal varices. Although TIPS is considered the best intermediate-to-long term therapy after failed endoscopic therapy for bleeding varices, the options are not well-defined when TIPS is relatively contraindicated, with scant data on alternative therapies due to relative rarity of duodenal varices. Prior cases were identified by computerized literature search, supplemented by one illustrative case. Favorable clinical outcome after angiography defined as no rebleeding during follow-up, without major procedural complications. RESULTS: Thirty-two cases of duodenal varices treated by angiographic-occlusion-with-sclerotherapy/embolotherapy- without-TIPS were analyzed. Patients averaged 59.5 ± 12.2 years old (female = 59%). Patients presented with melena-16, hematemesis & melena-5, large varices-5, growing varices-2, ruptured varices-1, and other- 3. Twenty-nine patients had cirrhosis; etiologies included: alcoholism-11, hepatitis C-11, primary biliary cirrhosis- 3, hepatitis B-2, Budd-Chiari-1, and idiopathic-1. Three patients did not have cirrhosis, including hepatic metastases from rectal cancer-1, Wilson's disease-1, and chronic liver dysfunction-1. Thirty-one patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy before therapeutic angiography, including fifteen undergoing endoscopic variceal therapy. Therapeutic angiographic techniques included balloon-occluded retrograde-transvenous-obliteration (BRTO) with sclerotherapy and/or embolization-21, DBOE (double-balloon-occluded-embolotherapy)-5, and other-6. Twenty-eight patients (87.5%; 95%-confidence interval: 69-100%) had favorable clinical outcomes after therapeutic angiography. Three patients were therapeutic failures: rebleeding at 0, 5, or 10 days after therapy. One major complication (Enterobacter sepsis) and one minor complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that angiographic-occlusion-with sclerotherapy/ embolotherapy-without-TIPS is relatively effective (~90% hemostasis-rate), and relatively safe (3% major-complication-rate). This therapy may be a useful treatment option for duodenal varices when endoscopic therapy fails and TIPS is relatively contraindicated.

Repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is safe for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the safety and long-term outcomes of repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in cirrhotic patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: Data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, who had previous TIPS implantation and received TACE between January 2010 and December 2012, were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was liver function, which was represented by model for end-stage liver disease score, Child-Pugh-Turcotte score, serum total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase. Changes in liver function before and after the initial TACE procedure and hepatobiliary severe adverse events (SAEs) were compared. Liver function following the initial TACE session was compared with that obtained in later TACE sessions. The secondary outcome measures were tumor response to multiple TACE sessions and survival. RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent at least two TACE sessions, while nine patients underwent at least three sessions during the follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference between the liver function tests performed before and one-month after the TACE procedure. Grade 3 or 4 SAEs occurred in six (31.6 %) patients within one month. The one, two-, and three-year survival rates were 88%, 53%, and 32%, respectively. Tumor response of multiple TACE sessions was the only predictive risk factor of mortality (OR=4.40; P = 0.030; 95% CI, 1.15-16.85). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that repeated TACE is safe in selected patients with TIPS.

[Brief history of interventional radiology].

In 1923, angiography was first successively used for the human body. In 1953, a Swedish doctor Sven-Ivar Seldinger pioneered the Seldinger technique, which laid down the foundation of interventional radiology. In 1963, Charles Dotter first proposed the idea of interventional radiology. In 1964, Charles Dotter opened a new era of percutaneous angioplasty through accidental operation, marking the formation of interventional radiology. On this basis, the techniques of balloon catheter dilation and metal stent implantation was developed. Endovascular stent was proposed in 1969. In 1973, the percutaneous angioplasty has been a breakthrough with the emergence of soft double-lumen balloon catheter. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty is applied in 1977. Since the 1990s, balloon angioplasty relegated to secondary status with the emergence of metal stent. Currently, endovascular stent have entered a new stage with the emergence of temporary stent and stent grafts and biological stent. Transcatheter arterial embolization had been one of the most important basic techniques for interventional radiology since 1965, it had also been a corresponding development with the improvement of embolic agents and catheter technology for the treatment of diseases now. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt is a comprehensive interventional radiology technology since 1967, in which the biliary system can be reached through a jugular vein, and the improvement appeared with balloon expandable stent in 1986.Since 1972, non-vascular interventional techniques was another important branch of interventional radiology. Currently, it is applied in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases of the internal organs like the pancreas, liver, kidney, spinal cord, Fallopian tubes, esophagus and other organs. In 1973, Chinese radiologist first conducted the angiography test. Interventional radiology was introduced into China in the 1980s, it was readily developed through the sponsoring of training class (1981) and academic conferences (1986). Along with the return of the overseas scholars, the gap in the interventional diagnosis and treatment technology between China and the world has been narrowing since the 1990s.

Folic acid handling by the human gut: implications for food fortification and supplementation.

BACKGROUND: Current thinking, which is based mainly on rodent studies, is that physiologic doses of folic acid (pterylmonoglutamic acid), such as dietary vitamin folates, are biotransformed in the intestinal mucosa and transferred to the portal vein as the natural circulating plasma folate, 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (5-MTHF) before entering the liver and the wider systemic blood supply. OBJECTIVE: We tested the assumption that, in humans, folic acid is biotransformed (reduced and methylated) to 5-MTHF in the intestinal mucosa. DESIGN: We conducted a crossover study in which we sampled portal and peripheral veins for labeled folate concentrations after oral ingestion with physiologic doses of stable-isotope-labeled folic acid or the reduced folate 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid (5-FormylTHF) in 6 subjects with a transjugular intrahepatic porto systemic shunt (TIPSS) in situ. The TIPSS allowed blood samples to be taken from the portal vein. RESULTS: Fifteen minutes after a dose of folic acid, 80 ± 12% of labeled folate in the hepatic portal vein was unmodified folic acid. In contrast, after a dose of labeled 5-FormylTHF, only 4 ± 18% of labeled folate in the portal vein was unmodified 5-FormylTHF, and the rest had been converted to 5-MTHF after 15 min (postdose). CONCLUSIONS: The human gut appears to have a very efficient capacity to convert reduced dietary folates to 5-MTHF but limited ability to reduce folic acid. Therefore, large amounts of unmodified folic acid in the portal vein are probably attributable to an extremely limited mucosal cell dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) capacity that is necessary to produce tetrahydrofolic acid before sequential methylation to 5-MTHF. This process would suggest that humans are reliant on the liver for folic acid reduction even though it has a low and highly variable DHFR activity. Therefore, chronic liver exposure to folic acid in humans may induce saturation, which would possibly explain reports of systemic circulation of unmetabolized folic acid.

Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

BACKGROUND: The decreased portal blood flow and the potential decrease in arterial nutrient hepatic blood flow after creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) makes the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) challenging. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after TIPS in patients with HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2009, 20 patients underwent selective (segmental or subsegmental) TACE for HCC after TIPS. Among 20 patients, seven patients had undergone one to three sessions of TACE for HCC before TIPS creation. TACE was performed using a mixture of iodized oil and cisplatin, and absorbable gelatin sponge particles. Tumor response, complications, and patient survival were evaluated after TACE. RESULTS: After TACE, 14 of the 20 (70%) patients showed a tumor response, with only one (5%) experiencing a TACE-related major complication, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. None of the patients who underwent TACE after TIPS died within 30 days. During the follow-up period (range 2.2-107 months; mean 32.6 months), 18 patients died and two remained alive. The median survival period after TACE was 23 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor stage was the only independent prognostic factor for patient survival (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Selective TACE may be safe and effective for the palliative treatment of HCC in patients with TIPS. Late tumor stage ( ≥III) was poor prognostic factor for determining the patient survival period after post-TIPS TACE.

Management of refractory ascites.

Ascites that does not respond or recurs after high-dose diuresis and sodium restriction should be considered refractory ascites. As cirrhosis advances, the escaping fluid overwhelms the lymphatic return. Decrease in renal plasma flow leads to increased sodium reabsorption at the proximal tubule leading to decreased responsiveness to loop diuretics and mineralocorticoid antagonists, which work distally. These complex hemodynamic alterations lead to refractory ascites. In refractory ascites, high-dose diuresis (400 mg of spironolactone and 160 mg of furosemide) and sodium restriction (<90 mmol/d) result in inadequate weight loss and sub optimal sodium excretion (<78 mmol/d). Further use of diuretics is limited by complications such as encephalopathy, azotemia, renal insufficiency, hyponatremia, and hyperkalemia. Therapy for refractory ascites is limited. The available therapies are repeated large volume paracentesis (LVP), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, peritoneovenous shunts, investigational medical therapies, and liver transplantation. LVP with concomitant volume expanders is the initial treatment of choice. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic seems to be superior to LVP in reducing the need for repeated paracentesis and improves the quality of life. Several treatments that act at different steps in the pathogenesis of ascites are investigational, and some show promising results. Splanchnic and peripheral vasoconstrictors (Octreotide, Midodrine, and Terlipressin) increase effective arterial volume and decrease activation of the renin-angiotensin system with resultant increase in renal sodium excretion. Clonidine when given with spironolactone has been shown to cause rapid mobilization of ascites by significantly decreasing the sympathetic activity and renin-aldosterone levels. Natural aquaretics and synthetic V2 receptor antagonists (satavaptan) are being evaluated for mobilization of ascites by increasing the excretion of solute-free water. Liver transplantation remains the only definitive therapy for refractory ascites. Because refractory ascites is a poor prognostic sign, liver transplantation should be considered and incorporated early in the treatment plan.

[Pleural effusions and ascites--surgical and palliative aspects]. / Pleuraerguss und Aszites--chirurgische und palliative Aspekte.

BACKGROUND: Pleural effusions and ascites are associated with distressing symptoms like dyspnoea, intestinal obstruction, vomiting, nausea and pain. In patients with underlying malignancy, the prognosis is limited to few months. After unsuccessful medical treatment, surgical and experimental palliative treatment is indicated. METHODS: This review includes a systematic analysis of surgical, experimental and palliative options. RESULTS: In patients with pleural effusions, thoracocentesis, permanent percutaneous drainage, thoracoperitoneal shunts as well as pleurodesis by tubes or thoracoscopy are available, which will be used depending on the re-expansion of the lung. In patients with ascites, paracentesis is able to control acute symptoms. For long-lasting treatment, portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are favourable for patients with liver cirrhosis. Peritoneovenous shunts can be implanted by laparotomy, but are correlated with high rates of complications and occlusions. In patients with malignancy, pleural effusions and ascites may also be controlled by complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic chemoperfusion. This aggressive surgical concept is limited to single carefully selected patients. In malignant ascites, intraperitoneal immunotherapy by catumaxomab is a novel and highly effective option, which controls ascites by targeted destruction of peritoneal cancer cells. CONCLUSION: Various options for treatment of pleural effusions and ascites are available. Careful evaluation of the individual patient is necessary to improve quality of life and survival.

Pharmacotherapy for hepatic encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a challenging clinical complication of liver dysfunction with a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric abnormalities that range from mild disturbances in cognitive function and consciousness to coma and death. The pathogenesis of HE in cirrhosis is complex and multifactorial, but a key role is thought to be played by circulating gut-derived toxins of the nitrogenous compounds, most notably ammonia. Therapeutic treatment options for HE are currently limited and have appreciable risks and benefits associated with their use. Management of HE primarily involves avoidance of precipitating factors, limitation of dietary protein intake, and administration of various ammonia-lowering therapies such as non-absorbable disaccharides and select antimicrobial agents. Non-absorbable disaccharides, such as lactulose, have traditionally been regarded as first-line pharmacotherapy for patients with HE. However, multiple adverse events have been associated with their use. In addition, recent literature has questioned the true efficacy of the disaccharides for this indication. Neomycin, metronidazole and vancomycin may be used as alternative treatments for patients intolerant or unresponsive to non-absorbable disaccharides. Antimicrobials reduce bacterial production of ammonia and other bacteria-derived toxins through suppression of intestinal flora. Neomycin has been reported to be as effective as lactulose, and similar efficacy has been reported with vancomycin and metronidazole for the management of HE. However, the adverse effects frequently associated with these antimicrobials limit their use as first-line pharmacological agents. Neomycin is the most commonly used antimicrobial for HE and, although poorly absorbed, systemic exposure to the drug in sufficient amounts causes hearing loss and renal toxicity. Long-term neomycin therapy requires annual auditory testing and continuous monitoring of renal function. Long-term use of metronidazole has been associated with neurotoxicity in patients with cirrhosis, including dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy. Vancomycin may be a safer option for HE in patients with chronic liver disease; however, limited experience, possible bacterial overgrowth and risk for enteric bacteria resistance preclude the routine use of vancomycin for HE. Rifaximin is a novel antimicrobial agent with a wide spectrum of activity that has shown promise as an alternative antimicrobial treatment option for HE. Several clinical trials have compared rifaximin to the disaccharides, lactulose and lactitol, and the antimicrobial neomycin. Rifaximin appears to be at least as effective as conventional drug therapy and has been associated with fewer adverse effects due to its limited systemic absorption. The available clinical data appear to support a favourable benefit-risk ratio for rifaximin, which has shown efficacy with an improved tolerability profile. Future studies are needed in order to truly characterize its cost effectiveness in today's healthcare environment. Other less frequently utilized alternative treatment options include administration of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists, branched-chain amino acids, ornithine aspartate, zinc supplementation, sodium benzoate, dopamine receptor agonists, acarbose and probiotics. Presently, there is relatively limited clinical data supporting their routine use in HE.

Recent advances in the management of hepato-renal syndrome (HRS).

Hepato-renal syndrome (HRS) is a functional renal failure complicating end-stage liver disease. HRS is characterized by marked arterial vasodilation (mainly of the splanchnic bed) and severe renal vasoconstriction. HRS is classified into 2 types: type I HRS shows a rapid and progressive decline in renal function with a very poor prognosis (median survival of about 2 weeks); HRS type 2 has a more stable renal failure, with a median survival of about 6 months. The management of HRS is still a big challenge. The definitive therapy for HRS is liver transplantation (LT); however, the survival rate of HRS patients is poor, and important organ shortage exists. Various approaches have been used for HRS treatment including vasoconstrictor therapy. Recent evidence has shown that vasoconstrictor agents are effective and serve as a bridge to LT; the rationale for vasoconstrictors is to counteract the splanchnic arterial vasodilation and increase the effective arterial blood volume. Thus, renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rates improve. Terlipressin, a V1 vasopressin agonist, has been used frequently. A recent meta-analysis of clinical trials showed that the pooled rate of patients who reversed HRS after terlipressin therapy was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.42; 0.61; P = 0.0001, /2 = 24.6%). The pooled Odds Ratio (OR) for mortality rate in HRS patients who were not responders to terlipressin versus responders was 5.746 (95% CI, 1.5; 21.9; P = 0.0005). Prospective, controlled clinical trials are in progress to address the impact of vasoconstrictor use on survival in HRS patients. Alternative therapies such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) have given encouraging results but experience is extremely limited.

Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS). METHODS: Between January 1999 and September 2004, 6 patients with HCC and TIPS were treated with either TACE (n = 3) or TACE in combination with PEI (n = 3). One patient had a known advanced, untreated HCC prior to TIPS. In the remaining 5 patients HCC was diagnosed 14, 17, 51, 69, and 76 months respectively after elective TIPS. TACE was performed using a mixture of 30-60 mg of epirubicin and 10 ml of lipiodol following superselective catheterization of tumor-feeding vessels. PEI was performed under CT guidance. METHODS: The mean follow-up time after treatment of HCC was 26.2 months (range 7-46 months). During follow-up, all patients were free of rebleeding. Two patients died 7 and 38 months after one session of TACE and PEI (77 months after TIPS) and three sessions of TACE (91 months after TIPS), respectively. The cause of death was liver failure (Child-Pugh class C) and peritonitis, respectively. A third patient underwent liver transplantation 24 months after TIPS and several sessions of TACE. In the remaining 3 patients, the HCC is well controlled 13, 30, and 46 months after repetitive percutaneous treatment without signs of hepatic deterioration or metastasis. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter arterial superselective chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection seems to be beneficial even in HCC patients treated with TIPS, provided that the liver function is adequate.

A patient with portal hypertension and blindness after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

We report on a case of recurrent variceal bleeding from gastric varices, which was treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and Histoacryl injection into the gastric varices. Furthermore, the patient had a small patent foramen ovale without a right-to-left shunt. After the intervention, the patient developed acute neurological disorders as a result of a cerebral paradoxical embolism. In the following, we describe the potential risk of histoacryl in paradoxical embolization when used for the injection of variceal collaterals during TIPS placement in patients with portal hypertension. The present case report shows a very rare but important complication after TIPS implantation. To avoid this complication it is recommended to perform echocardiography before all TIPS placements.