Dermatomyositis: a comprehensive review of clinical manifestations, serological features, and therapeutic approaches.

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disorder, which belongs to a group of rare autoimmune dermatoses characterized by different skin features and variable muscle involvement. We recognize four main variants of DM: classic DM, clinically amyopathic DM, paraneoplastic DM, and juvenile DM. Clinically, patients show several skin features, but heliotrope rash, and violaceous papules located at the interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joints (Gottron's papules) are the most frequently observed. Together with skin features, patients show muscle involvement, most commonly with symmetrical weakness of the proximal muscles. DM belongs to the facultative paraneoplastic dermatoses and a wide range of solid or hematologic malignancies can be detected in DM patients. Serologically, a wide range of autoantibodies can be detected in patients with DM. Indeed, distinct serotypes can be related to specific phenotypes with specific clinical features, carrying a different risk for systemic involvement and for malignancies. Systemic corticosteroids are still considered the first-line approach, but several steroid-sparing agents, such as methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, have been reported as effective in treating DM. Furthermore, new class of drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, purified immunoglobulins or Janus kinase inhibitors are becoming more relevant in the clinical practice or are currently under investigation. In this work, we aim to offer a clinical overview of the diagnostic workout, the characteristics of DM variants, the role of autoantibodies in DM, and the management of this life-threatening systemic disorder.

Clasificación y manejo actual en dermatomiositis juvenil / Classification and current management in juvenile dermatomyositis

La Dermatomiositis Juvenil representa el 75-80% de las miopatías inflamatorias juveniles. Si bien, tiene baja incidencia y prevalencia, presenta importante morbilidad dada por sus manifestaciones cutáneas, musculares, pulmonares, gastrointestinales, cardiacas, entre otras. Corresponde a un desorden poligénico con múltiples factores gatillantes, que determina el desarrollo de una vasculopatía que lleva a atrofia muscular, inflamación y activación de vías del IFN-1. Actualmente su diagnóstico se basa en las guias EULAR/ACR (2017). En los últimos años, se han descubiertos distintos subtipos de la enfermedad, basados en el perfil de autoanticuerpos específicos de miositis, lo que ha permitido establecer pronóstico y estrategias terapéuticas personalizadas. El manejo farmacológico continúa basándose principalmente en el uso de corticoesteroides y DMARDs, así como también terapia biológica; en los últimos años, los inhibidores JAK han mostrado resultados promisorios, convirtiéndose en la más nueva alternativa terapéutica para el control de la enfermedad.

Juvenile Dermatomyositis represents 75-80% of juvenile inflammatory myopathies. Although it has a low incidence and prevalence, it presents significant morbidity due to its cutaneous, muscular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal and cardiac manifestations, among others. It corresponds to a polygenic disorder with multiple triggering factors, which determines the development of a vasculopathy that leads to muscle atrophy, inflammation and activation of IFN-1 pathways. Currently its diagnosis is based on the EULAR/ACR guidelines (2017). In recent years, different subtypes of the disease have been discovered, based on the profile of myositis-specific autoantibodies, which has made it possible to establish prognosis and personalized therapeutic strategies. Pharmacological management continues to be based mainly on the use of corticosteroids and DMARDs, as well as biological therapy; In recent years, JAK inhibitors have shown promising results, becoming the newest therapeutic alternative for disease control.

Agastache honey has superior antifungal activity in comparison with important commercial honeys.

There is an urgent need for new effective antifungal agents suitable for the treatment of superficial skin infections, since acquired resistance of fungi to currently available agents is increasing. The antifungal activity of mono-floral Agastache honey and commercially available honeys were tested against dermatophytes (T. mentagrophytes and T. rubrum) and C. albicans (ATCC 10231 and a clinical isolate) by agar well diffusion and micro-dilution (AWD and MD). In AWD and MD assays, Agastache honey was effective at 40% concentration against dermatophytes (zone diameter, 19.5-20 mm) and C. albicans with the same MIC and MFC values indicating fungicidal activity. Tea tree honey was effective at 80% concentration (zone diameter, 14 mm) against dermatophytes and at 40% concentration against T. mentagrophytes and C. albicans. Manuka was effective at 80% concentration only against T. mentagrophytes (zone diameter, 12 mm) and at 40% against T. rubrum and C. albicans with fungistatic activity. Similar to the AWD results, Jelly bush, Super Manuka, and Jarrah showed no activity against dermatophytes but showed some activity against C. albicans. Headspace volatiles of six honeys were isolated by SPME and identified by GC-MS. The characteristic chemical markers for each honey were as follows: Agastache- Phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) and Estragole; Manuka and Tea-tree- Acetanisole and Methyl 3,5-dimethoxybenzoate; Jelly bush- Linalool and Nonanal; Super Manuka- Methyl 3,5-dimethoxybenzoate and Nonanal; Jarrah- Isophorone and Nonanoic acid. Overall, analysis of the bioactive compound content and antifungal activity of Agastache honey indicated possible use as an antifungal agent for management of superficial fungal infections.

Biologic therapies for refractory juvenile dermatomyositis: five years of experience of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance in North America.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) has improved remarkably since the 1960's with the use of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy. Yet there remain a minority of children who have refractory disease. Since 2003 the sporadic use of biologics (genetically-engineered proteins that usually are derived from human genes) for inflammatory myositis has been reported. In 2011-2016 we investigated our collective experience of biologics in JDM through the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA). METHODS: The JDM biologic study group developed a survey on the CARRA member experience using biologics for Juvenile DM utilizing Delphi consensus methods in 2011-2012. The survey was completed online by the CARRA members interested in JDM in 2012. A second survey was similarly developed that provided more opportunity to describe their experiences with biologics in JDM in detail and was completed by CARRA members in Feb 2013. During three CARRA meetings in 2013-2015, nominal group techniques were used for achieving consensus on the current choices of biologic drugs. A final survey was performed at the 2016 CARRA meeting. RESULTS: One hundred and five of a potential 231 pediatric rheumatologists (42%) responded to the first survey in 2012. Thirty-five of 90 had never used a biologic for Juvenile DM at that time. Fifty-five of 91 (denominators vary) had used biologics for JDM in their practice with 32%, 5%, and 4% using rituximab, etanercept, and infliximab, respectively, and 17% having used more than one of the three drugs. Ten percent used a biologic as monotherapy, 19% a biologic in combination with methotrexate (mtx), 52% a biologic in combination with mtx and corticosteroids, 42% a combination of a biologic, mtx, corticosteroids (steroids), and an immunosuppressive drug, and 43% a combination of a biologic, IVIG and mtx. The results of the second survey supported these findings in considerably more detail with multiple combinations of drugs used with biologics and supported the use of rituximab, abatacept, anti-TNFα drugs, and tocilizumab in that order. One hundred percent recommended that CARRA continue studying biologics for JDM. The CARRA meeting survey in 2016 again supported the study and use of these four biologic drug groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our CARRA JDM biologic work group developed and performed three surveys demonstrating that pediatric rheumatologists in North America have been using multiple biologics for refractory JDM in numerous scenarios from 2011 to 2016. These survey results and our consensus meetings determined our choice of four biologic therapies (rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab and anti-TNFα drugs) to consider for refractory JDM treatment when indicated and to evaluate for comparative effectiveness and safety in the future. Significance and Innovations This is the first report that provides a substantial clinical experience of a large group of pediatric rheumatologists with biologics for refractory JDM over five years. This experience with biologic therapies for refractory JDM may aid pediatric rheumatologists in the current treatment of these children and form a basis for further clinical research into the comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics for refractory JDM.

Zoonotic necrotizing myositis caused by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in a farmer.

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus is a beta-hemolytic group C streptococcus mainly causing infections in domesticated animals. Here we describe the first case of zoonotic necrotizing myositis caused by this bacterium. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 73-year-old, previously healthy farmer with two asymptomatic Shetland ponies in his stable. After close contact with the ponies while feeding them, he rapidly developed erythema of his left thigh and sepsis with multiple organ failure. The clinical course was severe and complicated, requiring repetitive surgical excision of necrotic muscle, treatment with vasopressors, mechanical ventilation and continuous venovenous hemofiltration, along with adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The patient was discharged from hospital at day 30, without obvious sequelae. The streptococcal isolate was identified as Streptococcus equi by MALDI-ToF MS, and was later assigned subspecies identification as S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Multilocus sequence typing identified the strain as a novel sequence type (ST 364), closely related to types previously identified in horses and cattle. A focused proteomic analysis revealed that the ST 364 expressed putative virulence factors similar to that of Streptococcus pyogenes, including homologues of the M protein, streptodornases, interleukin 8-protease and proteins involved in the biosynthesis of streptolysin S. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the zoonotic potential of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus and the importance of early clinical recognition, rapid and radical surgical therapy, appropriate antibiotics and adequate supportive measures when necrotizing soft tissue infection is suspected. The expression of Streptococcus pyogenes-like putative virulence determinants in ST 364 might partially explain the fulminant clinical picture.

[Dermatomyositis-update]. / Dermatomyositis - update.

Dermatomyositis is a rare idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that affects adults and children, mostly female. Hallmarks of the disease are myositis with necrosis, regeneration and perifascicular atrophy accompanied by a typical skin rash with heliotrope erythema, Gottron's sign, Gottron's papules and nail fold changes with splinter hemorrhage. Typical skin symptoms may appear 6 months up to 2 years before muscle involvement (amyopathic dermatomyositis). New myositis-specific antibodies may allow clinicoserologic correlations within a heterogeneous clinical spectrum. Autoantibody profiles, subtype of myositis, overlap with other collagen vascular disorders and/or malignancy (paraneoplastic dermatomyositis) as well as age of the patients all have a considerable impact on course and prognosis. Infections, drugs and tumors may trigger activation of T and B cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, overproduction of type I interferons and complement-mediated endothelial cell damage resulting in vasculopathy. UV radiation may also trigger dermatomyositis. Oral corticosteroids (1.5-2.0 mg/kg body weight/day) are the mainstay of treatment until improvement of muscle symptoms and/or normalization of muscle enzymes with subsequent slow tapering. Corticosteroids may be given as monotherapy or combined with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents' i.e. azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins. Prognosis has improved considerably since use of high-dose corticosteroids, from 50 to 90% response rate. New therapies with biologicals (anti-CD20-, anti-TNFalpha-, anti-interferon antibodies) and Janus kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated.

[Dermatomyositis in a family of Working Kelpies].

Eight members of a family of Working Kelpies were presented with signs compatible with dermatomyositis. Alopecia, crusts, ulcerations of the skin, depigmentation of nasal planum and lips, onychodystrophy and atrophy of the masticatory muscles were present with varying degree. Histopathology of the skin, but not from muscles was performed in three dogs and confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Different immunomodulating drugs (steroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, pentoxifylline, doxycyline/niacinamid, omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin E) were used with variable success. Dermatomyositis is an immune-mediated disease and a genetic predisposition is known in humans and certain canine breeds, mainly Shetland Sheepdogs and Collies, but also for the Beauceron. The responsible genes have not been identified so far. It is assumed that the Working Kelpie derives from the Collie which could explain a hereditary predisposition in the Kelpie.

Dermatomyositis and polymyositis: from immunopathology to immunotherapy (immunobiologics).

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), which include dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), are chronic systemic diseases associated with high morbidity and functional disability. Current treatment is based on the use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs, but a considerable number of patients is refractory to traditional therapy. That has led to the attempted use of biologics based on the physiopathogenesis of IIM. From the immunopathological viewpoint, PM and DM differ: the former is more related to cellular immunity, while the latter, to humoral immunity. In both, however, elevated concentrations of proinflammatory interleukins (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) and increased expression of molecules related to costimulation of T lymphocytes have been described; thus, the use of biologics in those conditions seems reasonable. Considering the biologics available, open-label studies are scarce, comprising mainly case reports and series. TNF blockers have yielded conflicting results, with no evidence of good response to treatment. The anti-CD20 therapy has the most promising results. Data on T lymphocyte costimulation blockade and anti-IL-6 therapy are extremely scarce, preventing any consideration. Thus, the use of biologics in IIM still remains an unconquered frontier. Biologics may have an important role in the management of IIM refractory to conventional therapy, but further prospective studies based on objective parameters of response to treatment are needed. So far, anti-CD20 therapy seems to be the most promising treatment for refractory IIM.

Dermatomiosite e polimiosite: da imunopatologia à imunoterapia (imunobiológicos) / Dermatomyositis and polymyositis: from immunopathology to immunotherapy (immunobiologics)

As miopatias inflamatórias idiopáticas (MII), das quais fazem parte a dermatomiosite (DM) e a polimiosite (PM), são doenças sistêmicas crônicas associadas a alta morbidade e incapacidade funcional. O tratamento atual baseia-se na corticoterapia e no uso de imunossupressores, porém uma parcela considerável dos pacientes é refratária à terapia tradicional. Isso tem levado à tentativa de uso de imunobiológicos nesses pacientes, tendo por fundamento a fisiopatogênese das MII. Do ponto de vista imunopatológico, há diferenças entre PM e DM: a primeira está mais relacionada à imunidade celular, enquanto na segunda o papel humoral parece mais importante. Em ambas, porém, são descritas concentrações elevadas de interleucinas pró-inflamatórias (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) e aumento da expressão de moléculas relacionadas à coestimulação dos linfócitos T - nessas condições, parece racional o uso da terapia biológica. Considerando os imunobiológicos disponíveis, são escassos os dados de trabalhos abertos na literatura, compostos principalmente por séries e relatos de casos. Os bloqueadores do TNF apresentam resultados conflitantes sem evidência de boa resposta ao tratamento. A terapia anti-CD20 possui os resultados mais promissores. É extremamente escassa a informação sobre o bloqueio da coestimulação do linfócito T e a terapia anti- IL-6, que impede qualquer consideração. Dessa maneira, o uso de imunobiológicos em MII ainda permanece como fronteira a ser explorada. A terapia biológica pode ter papel relevante no tratamento das MII refratárias à terapia convencional; no entanto, novos estudos prospectivos com base em parâmetros objetivos de resposta ao tratamento são necessários. Até o momento, a terapia anti-CD20 parece ser a mais promissora no tratamento das MII refratárias.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), which include dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM), are chronic systemic diseases associated with high morbidity and functional disability. Current treatment is based on the use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs, but a considerable number of patients is refractory to traditional therapy. That has led to the attempted use of biologics based on the physiopathogenesis of IIM. From the immunopathological viewpoint, PM and DM differ: the former is more related to cellular immunity, while the latter, to humoral immunity. In both, however, elevated concentrations of proinflammatory interleukins (TNF, IL-1, IL-6) and increased expression of molecules related to costimulation of T lymphocytes have been described; thus, the use of biologics in those conditions seems reasonable. Considering the biologics available, open-label studies are scarce, comprising mainly case reports and series. TNF blockers have yielded conflicting results, with no evidence of good response to treatment. The anti-CD20 therapy has the most promising results. Data on T lymphocyte costimulation blockade and anti-IL-6 therapy are extremely scarce, preventing any consideration. Thus, the use of biologics in IIM still remains an unconquered frontier. Biologics may have an important role in the management of IIM refractory to conventional therapy, but further prospective studies based on objective parameters of response to treatment are needed. So far, anti-CD20 therapy seems to be the most promising treatment for refractory IIM.

[Polymyositis/dermatomyositis--clinical picture and treatment]. / Polimiozitis/dermatomiozitis--klinicka slika i terapija.

The clinical presentation ofmyositis ranges from a painless muscle weakness to significant myalgia with muscle weakness and constitutional symptoms. Along with muscle and skin affection and constitutional symptoms, the disease can affect lungs, joints, heart and gastrointestinal system. It is important to note that the clinical presentation ofmyositis syndrome may overlap with symptoms of other connective tissue disease in overlap syndromes (SLE, SSCL, RA, SSjö). Common manifestations of the disease are weakness and muscle fatigue, which is the result of skeletal muscles inflammation (usually the proximal group of muscles, bilaterally and symmetrical). Severe forms of the disease with affection of the throat and respiratory muscles can vitally endan- ger patients. Among constitutional (general) symptoms, fever, malaise and weight loss are usually expressed. Skin affection in dermatomyositis can be localized or generalized like vesiculobullous erythroderma. Pathognomonic cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis are Gottron's papules and heliotrope erythema. Lungs are most commonly affected organs (with exception of muscles and skin) in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. The affection of lung can sometimes result in fatal outcome (interstitial lung disease, secondary pulmonary hypertension). Cardiac affection is usually subclinical, but can also be expressed as heart failure, acute coronary syndrome or conduction disturbances. Infrequent manifestations of the disease are gastroesophageal reflux, malabsorption, gastrointestinal mucosal ulceration, soft tissue calcification, Raynaud's syndrome, arthralgia/arthritis and some other less common clinical manifestations of the disease. Treatment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis includes immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy and supportive, symptomatic treatment. The basis for myositis treatment are glucocorticoids, which are applied orally in a daily dosage regimen of 0.75 to 1 mg/kg/day, and in severe forms of the disease in the i.v. pulse doses of 1 g/day. Immunosuppressants/immunomodulators are added in the therapy along with glucocorticoids for better control of the disease and to reduce the required dose of glucocorticoids (side effects of longterm high doses glucocorticoide use). The most commonly used immunosuppressive drug is methotrexate at a dose of up to 25 mg/week. Hydroxychloroquine has a good effect on the cutaneous manifestations of the disease. Among other immunosuppressants which are used in the treatment of myositis are azathioprine, cyclosporine (in patients with pulmonary affection), mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. Intravenous immunoglobulins applied parenterally in a dose of 2 g/kg divided into multiple doses showed an excellent clinical effect in patients with affection of the esophagus and throat muscles, in patients with pulmonary affection and in patients with resistant disease. The experience with the biologics is limited to a small number of patients. Physiotherapy is a necessary form of treatment for the recovery of muscle strength in the remission phase of the disease. A prompt treatment of infections and heart failure is sometimes life-saving in patients with myositis. Symptomatic treatment of pain with analgesics and NSAIDs reduces pain, speeds up recovery and improves the quality of life in patients with myositis.

[New therapeutic approaches for polymyositis and dermatomyositis]. / A polymyositis és dermatomyositis modern kezelési lehetoségei.

Inflammatory myopathies are chronic, immune-mediated diseases characterized with progressive proximal muscle weakness. They encompass a variety of syndromes with protean manifestations. The aims of therapy are to increase muscle strength, prevent the development of contractures, and to manage the systemic manifestations of the disease. This is a complex treatment which requires routine and wide knowledge. The most important task is to recognize the disease and guide the patient to immunologic center. Although the first line of therapy continues to include corticosteroids, there are a multitude of agents available for treating patients with myositis. There are several different immunosuppressive agents which may be applied alone or in combination with each other, as well as an increasing number of novel and exciting biologic agents targeting molecules participating in the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathy. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation in the remission period may significantly improve the functional outcome of patients with these disorders.

Dermatomiositis de comienzo precoz: a propósito de un caso / Early-onset juvenile dermatomyositis

Introducción. La dermatomiositis es una vasculopatía sistémica, de origen autoinmune, que afecta sobre todo a músculo y piel. Su incidencia es de 0,2/100.000. El síntoma más frecuente es la debilidad de la musculatura proximal y la aparición del exantema típico de esta enfermedad. El diagnóstico se basa en el cumplimiento de los criterios de Bohan y Peter (1975). El tratamiento de primera línea son los corticoides. El pronóstico en las formas agudas y tratadas suele ser favorable en el 80% de los casos, con remisión de la sintomatología a los 2 años. Puede haber recidivas. Caso clínico. Presentamos un paciente varón de 2 años y medio de edad con pérdida de fuerza muscular progresiva y dolor en el área Dermatomiositis juvenil d’inici precoç Alicia Mainou-Pintó 1, Carlos Mainou-Cid 1, Fernando Plaza-Martín 1, Joan Ros-Viladons 2, Jordi Antón-López 2 1 Unitat de Pediatria. EAP Sarrià/Vallvidrera/Les Planes. Barcelona. 2 Unitat de Reumatologia Pediàtrica. Servei de Pediatria. Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Universitat de Barcelona. Esplugues de Llobregat (Barcelona) proximal de las extremidades inferiores, de 3 semanas de evolución. En los últimos 15 días le aparece una erupción en cara y manos. Como pruebas complementarias destacan: analítica sanguínea con elevación de ALT, AST, LDH, CPK y aldolasa, electromiograma mostrando un patrón miopático, resonancia nuclear magnética de cintura escapular con edema muscular, y biopsia muscular normal. Tras el tratamiento con prednisona, cloroquina, omeprazol y suplementos de calcio y vitamina D su evolución es favorable, y recupera paulatinamente todas las habilidades musculares perdidas. Comentarios. Se presenta un caso clínico que, aunque es típico en cuanto a la forma de presentación y la sintomatología, no lo es tanto por la edad de su comienzo. La dermatomiositis suele ser una enfermedad de diagnóstico hospitalario, aunque, conociendo bien las peculiaridades de su sintomatología, su sospecha y confirmación puede llegar del pediatra de atención primaria, como en el caso publicado(AU)

Introduction. Dermatomyositis is a systemic vasculopathy of autoimmune origin that affects especially muscle and skin. Its incidence is 0.2/100,000. The most frequent symptom is a progressive proximal muscle weakness and a typical skin rash. The diagnosis is based on the Bohan and Peter criteria (1975). The first line of treatment is with steroids. The prognosis of the acute and treated forms is favourable in 80% of patients with remission in 2 years, although there is risk of recurrence. Clinical observation. A 2.5 year-old boy presented with a 3-week history of progressive loss of muscle strength and pain in the proximal the lower limbs. Two weeks prior to presentation, a rash developed on his hands and face. Diagnostic work-up showed elevated ALT, AST, LDH, CPK and aldolase, abnormal electromyography with myopathic pattern, magnetic resonance of scapular area with muscle edema, and normal muscle biopsy. He was treated with prednisone, chloroquine, omeprazole, calcium supplements and vitamin D, with good evolution and progressive recovery of muscular strength. Commentary. Although this case presented with typical symptoms, of dermatomyositis, the young age of the patient is unusual. Dermatomyositis is usually diagnosed in the hospital setting; however, as highlighted by this case, awareness of the disease and its clinical presentation may facilitate its diagnosis and treatment by the primary care pediatrician(AU)

Dermatomiosite juvenil: revisão e atualização em patogênese e tratamento / Juvenile dermatomyositis: review and update of the pathogenesis and treatment

A dermatomiosite juvenil (DMJ) é uma doença autoimune caracterizada por vasculopatia sistêmica. Manifestações principais da DMJ incluem fraqueza muscular proximal simétrica, elevação de enzimas musculares séricas e lesões cutâneas, dentre as quais o heliotropo e as pápulas de Gottron são patognomônicas. Reconhecimento precoce e instituição rápida de terapia adequada permitem melhorar o prognóstico da doença e evitar o aparecimento de calcinose. Embora a base do tratamento seja o glicocorticoide, os imunossupressores mais frequentemente associados são metotrexato, ciclosporina, azatioprina e ciclofosfamida, dependendo da gravidade da DMJ. Atualmente investiga-se a utilidade dos imunobiológicos nos casos refratários, mas os resultados são controversos ou pouco expressivos. Pretende-se neste artigo fazer uma revisão sobre DMJ, com ênfase em recentes atualizações na sua patogênese e tratamento.

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by systemic vasculopathy. Its main manifestations include symmetrical proximal muscle weakness, elevated serum muscle enzymes and cutaneous lesions, among which the heliotrope and Gottron's papules are pathognomonic. Early recognition and prompt therapy allow better prognosis and prevent the development of calcinosis. Although the treatment is based on glucocorticoids, the more commonly associated immunosuppressors include methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide, depending on the severity of disease. The use of immunobiologicals for refractory cases remains under investigation, but the results are controversial or inexpressive. In this review, we highlight recent updates on the pathogenesis and treatment of JDM.

Etanercept. Otras indicaciones / Etanercept. Other indications

La utilización de los tratamientos biológicos en el campo de la Dermatología ha sido reciente y se ha centrado prioritariamente en el tratamiento de la psoriasis. Etanercept ha demostrado su eficacia y seguridad en este campo, si bien es cierto que, por su mecanismo de acción y por su perfil de seguridad, se ha utilizado en numerosas patologías diferentes a la psoriasis con resultados variables. Presentamos un caso de acrodermatitis de Hallopeau tratada con etanercept con buenos resultados. Dadas las características de cronicidad, progresividad y en general mala respuesta a los tratamientos convencionales, el empleo de etanercept supone una ayuda en las posibilidades terapéuticas de la acrodermatitis de Hallopeau. Se revisan además otras posibles indicaciones de etanercept en procesos diferentes a la psoriasis (AU)

The use of biological treatments in the field of Dermatology has been recent and priority focus has been given to the treatment of psoriasis. Etanercept has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in this field although it is true that it has been used in many different diseases other than psoriasis with variable results due to its action mechanism and safety profile. We present a case of Hallopeau’s Acrodermatitis treated with etanercept with good results. Given the characteristics of chronicity, progressiveness and, in general, poor response to conventional treatments, the use of etanercept is of help in the therapeutic possibilities of Hallopeau’s Acrodermatitis. In addition, other possible indications of etanercept in conditions other than Psoriasis are reviewed (AU)

Presente y futuro de la terapia biológica en Dermatología / Present and future of biologic therapy in dermatology

No disponible

No disponible

Mind-body hypnotic imagery in the treatment of auto-immune disorders.

For many years Western Medicine has considered the immune system to be separate and independent from the central nervous system. However, significant scientific advances and research discoveries that occurred during the past 50 years have presented additional facts that the immune system does interact with the central nervous system with mutual influence. This article provides a systematic review of the literature on the connection between the brain and the immune system and its clinical implications. It then provides a rational foundation for the role of using hypnosis and imagery to therapeutically influence the immune system. Five case examples are provided with illustrated instructions for clinicians on how hypnosis and imagery may be utilized in the treatment of patients with auto-immune disorders. Suggestions for future research in this field are included.

The effects of meditation and visual imagery on an immune system disorder: dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between a patient's "spontaneous recovery" from dermatomyositis and her practice of transcendental meditation and visual imagery without confounding effects of conventional therapies. DESIGN: Study of time-varying relationships between (1) measures of arm strength and skin condition (rash and pain) and (2) mind-body interventions-controlling for psychologic stress-in a patient with dermatomyositis, using regression analysis to determine half-lives of treatments and stress. SETTING: Institutional referral center. INTERVENTION: Transcendental meditation and visual imagery (no drugs). OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily measurements of arm strength and skin condition over 294 days. Events producing psychologic stress were also rated using a numerical scale. RESULTS: The patient recovered, which is a low-probability event without conventional therapy. Regression analysis of time dependence between measures of arm strength, rash, and pain and application of mind-body treatments revealed statistically significant relationships for both meditation (p values 0.02 to 0.001) and visual imagery (p values 0.02 to 0.002). Stress had a significant negative impact on skin symptoms but not arm strength. Beneficial effects of meditation had half-lives of 48-59 days for skin condition and no detectable decay for arm strength. Benefits of visual imagery were more transient (half-lives 4-18 days). The effects of stress had half-lives of only 1-3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between mind-body therapies and the patient's recovery from dermatomyositis, possibly mediated by influences on the humoral immune system. A key factor in the recovery was the slower decay rate of meditation and visual imagery compared to stress. As dermatomyositis is a humorally mediated immune microvasculopathy, the benefits of meditation and imagery in our patient comport with a growing body of evidence showing that these techniques influence immune system function.